Langat Virus Infection Affects Hippocampal Neuron Morphology and Function in Mice Without Disease Signs Angela D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Langat Virus Infection Affects Hippocampal Neuron Morphology and Function in Mice Without Disease Signs Angela D Cornelius et al. Journal of Neuroinflammation (2020) 17:278 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01951-w RESEARCH Open Access Langat virus infection affects hippocampal neuron morphology and function in mice without disease signs Angela D. A. Cornelius1,2†, Shirin Hosseini3,4†, Sarah Schreier5†, David Fritzsch5†, Loreen Weichert1,5, Kristin Michaelsen-Preusse3, Markus Fendt6,7 and Andrea Kröger1,5,7,8* Abstract Background: Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is an important human pathogen that can cause the serious illness tick-borne encephalitis (TBE). Patients with clinical symptoms can suffer from severe meningoencephalitis with sequelae that include cognitive disorders and paralysis. While less than 30% of patients with clinical symptoms develop meningoencephalitis, the number of seropositive individuals in some regions indicates a much higher prevalence of TBEV infections, either with no or subclinical symptoms. The functional relevance of these subclinical TBEV infections and their influence on brain functions, such as learning and memory, has not been investigated so far. Methods: To compare the effect of low and high viral replication in the brain, wildtype and Irf-7−/− mice were infected with Langat virus (LGTV), which belongs to the TBEV-serogroup. The viral burden was analyzed in the olfactory bulb and the hippocampus. Open field, elevated plus maze, and Morris water maze experiments were performed to determine the impact on anxiety-like behavior, learning, and memory formation. Spine density of hippocampal neurons and activation of microglia and astrocytes were analyzed. Results: In contrast to susceptible Irf-7−/− mice, wildtype mice showed no disease signs upon LGTV infection. Detection of viral RNA in the olfactory bulb revealed CNS infections in wildtype and Irf-7−/− mice. Very low levels of viral replication were detectable in the hippocampus of wildtype mice. Although wildtype mice develop no disease signs, they showed reduced anxiety-like behavior and impaired memory formation, whereas Irf-7−/− mice were not affected. This impairment was associated with a significant decrease in spine density of neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region of wildtype mice. Microglia activation and astrogliosis were detected in the hippocampus. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate that subclinical infections by viruses from the TBEV-serogroup affected anxiety-like behavior. Virus replication in the olfactory bulb induced far-reaching effects on hippocampal neuron morphology and impaired hippocampus-dependent learning and memory formation. Keywords: Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Langat virus, Type I interferon, Inapparent infection, Hippocampus, Learning and memory * Correspondence: [email protected] †Angela D. A. Cornelius, Shirin Hosseini, Sarah Schreier and David Fritzsch contributed equally to this work. 1Innate Immunity and Infection, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany 5Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Cornelius et al. Journal of Neuroinflammation (2020) 17:278 Page 2 of 17 Background formation, receives input from the entorhinal cortex, Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a member of the which relays through the dentate gyrus (DG) and the genus Flavivirus in the family of Flaviviridae. Flavi- Cornu Ammonis regions CA1 and CA3. Inflammatory cy- viruses comprise many human pathogens, including tokines can negatively affect long-term potentiation (LTP) Dengue virus (DENV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), [14, 15], neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and memory West Nile virus (WNV), Yellow fever virus (YFV), and formation [16–19]. It was shown that acute viral or bac- Zika virus (ZIKV) [1]. terial infections of the CNS or the periphery could lead to TBEV is transmitted to humans primarily by infected changes in the neuronal complexity and functional deficits ticks but can also be transmitted by dairy products from in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory [20, 21]. unpasteurized milk produced from infected livestock [2, Whereas severe TBEV infection has long-term in- 3]. Infection with TBEV causes tick-borne encephalitis fluence on behavioral function [6], the question (TBE) which affects the central nervous system (CNS). arises, whether also inapparent infections of the CNS TBE is a typically biphasic disease. In the first phase of alter neural circuits and lead to learning and behav- viremia, the dominant symptoms are fever, fatigue, general ioral deficits. The aim of this study was to malaise, headache, and pain followed by a second phase characterize the impact of low-pathogenic flavivirus with a clinical spectrum that ranges from mild meningitis infection, caused by LGTV in wildtype mice, on be- to severe encephalitis with or without myelitis and spinal havior and spatial memory. We compared findings −/− paralysis. More than 30% of patients with clinical symp- with Irf-7 mice, which showed high viral replica- toms caused by a TBEV infection develop prolonged se- tion in the brain and weight loss but recovered from quelae that include neuropsychiatric symptoms, severe an infection. We found that inapparent infections headaches, and a general decrease in quality of life [4, 5]. lead to alterations in hippocampal structure and The total number of cases worldwide has been estimated function and are associated with impairments in to be up to 13,000 per year, and as such, the infection con- spatial learning in infected mice. Our findings indi- stitutes the most important tick-borne viral disease. Sero- cate that non-recognized infections with neurotropic conversion without prominent morbidity is common. In viruses can cause neurological changes. two-thirds of infected humans, the infection is inapparent and without any disease signs [5–7]. Thus, possible cogni- tive impairments and impact on the behavior of patients Material and methods with unrecognized infections are unknown. Mice To prevent TBEV infection, the Langat virus (LGTV), Allanimalexperimentswereperformedincompli- a member of the TBEV serogroup, was used as a vaccine ance with the relevant animal welfare law (EU-Dir- against TBEV. In humans, LGTV is a low pathogenic fla- ective 2010/63/EU). The mice were housed and vivirus, and it shares 82–88% amino acid homology with handled in accordance with good animal practice as TBEV. Vaccination with LGTV resulted in a neuro- defined by FELASA. All animal experiments were ap- logical disease, with an incidence of approximately 1:18, provedbytheLowerSaxonyStateOfficeofCon- 500 and caused permanent neurologic sequelae among sumer Protection and Food Safety under permit the vaccinated. In adult mice, LGTV generally has a low number AZ 33.9-42502-04-15/1950 or by the Land- pathogenicity when inoculated subcutaneously or intra- esverwaltungsamt Sachsen-Anhalt AZ 42502-2-1344, cerebrally but is still associated with low-level viral repli- University Magdeburg. Wildtype C57BL/6 J (WT) −/− cation in the brain [8]. and Irf-7 mice were bred under SPF conditions at The innate immune system is essential for the control the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in of TBEV and LGTV infection. The type I interferon Braunschweig or at the Otto-von-Guericke University (IFN) system plays a pivotal role in the antiviral response Magdeburg, Germany. To exclude gender effects, all against TBEV infections. The loss of type I IFN re- experiments were performed with male and female sponses leads to higher viral replication and death of in- mice. Six- to 10-week-old mice were infected intra- fected mice [8]. Interferon regulatory factor-7 (IRF-7) is peritoneally (i.p.) with 104 focus-forming units (FFU) −/− a master regulator of type I IFN production, and Irf-7 LGTV in 100 μl PBS or mock injected with 100 μl mice are highly susceptible to various viruses [9]. PBS. Mice that lost 20% or more of their body Activation of the innate immune system induces pro- weight or showed pain were sacrificed. For analysis, duction of cytokines including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL- all mice were killed by transcardial perfusion with 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IFNs in the 30 ml PBS during anesthesia (100 μl/10 g body weight brain where they can have deleterious effects on cognitive ketamine (150 mg)/xylazine (9 mg)). For histological and emotional behavior
Recommended publications
  • Innate Immunity Evasion by Dengue Virus
    Viruses2012, 4, 397-413; doi:10.3390/v4030397 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Innate Immunity Evasion by Dengue Virus Juliet Morrison, Sebastian Aguirre and Ana Fernandez-Sesma * Department of Microbiology and the Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute (GHEPI), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (S.A.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-212-241-5182; Fax: +1-212-534-1684. Received: 30 January 2012; in revised version: 14 February 2012 / Accepted: 7 March 2012 / Published: 15 March 2012 Abstract: For viruses to productively infect their hosts, they must evade or inhibit important elements of the innate immune system, namely the type I interferon (IFN) response, which negatively influences the subsequent development of antigen-specific adaptive immunity against those viruses. Dengue virus (DENV) can inhibit both type I IFN production and signaling in susceptible human cells, including dendritic cells (DCs). The NS2B3 protease complex of DENV functions as an antagonist of type I IFN production, and its proteolytic activity is necessary for this function. DENV also encodes proteins that antagonize type I IFN signaling, including NS2A, NS4A, NS4B and NS5 by targeting different components of this signaling pathway, such as STATs. Importantly, the ability of the NS5 protein to bind and degrade STAT2 contributes to the limited host tropism of DENV to humans and non-human primates. In this review, we will evaluate the contribution of innate immunity evasion by DENV to the pathogenesis and host tropism of this virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Chikungunya Clinical Features and Complications
    Chikungunya Clinical features and complications Prof Fabrice SIMON, MD, PhD Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine LAVERAN Military Teaching Hospital - Marseille - France 1 Conflict of interest • Collaboration with Valneva on a vaccine candidate Chikungunya, two diseases in one • Arthropod-borne virus - Transmitted by Aedes spp. mosquitoes • Alphavirus - 3 lineages - Strong arthrotropism • Biphasic disease - Fever & arthralgia at acute stage - Chronic rheumatic and general disorders Long-term burden in public heath The natural history of chikungunya disease: three stages Acute D1 to D14 60-80% spt High viremia to D5-D7 Intense inflammation Simon F et al. French guidelines on chikungunya, Med Mal Infect 2015 4 Acute stage: frequently symptomatic • > 70% of symptomatic cases in Comoros archipelago, Reunion and India, 2005-2006 • 82% asymptomatic in Philippines, 2014 • 58.3% asymptomatic children in Managua, Nicaragua; 2014 • 15,7% of asymptomatic blood donors in French West Indies Josseran L et coll. Emerg Infect Dis 2006:12:1994-5 Kumar et al., 2011, Sergon et al. 2007, Sissoko et al., 2008 Yoon et al 2015, ; Kuan et al. 2016 Leparc-Goffart, personal comunication 5 Acute stage: common features • Fever (90-96%) : high, 2-4 days • Multiple arthralgia +/- arthritides (95-100%) : the CHIK signature Brutal disability in daily life • +/- other non severe manifestations • Spontaneous mild to complete improvement after 10-12 days, or not… Borgherini G et coll. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:1401-7 Hochedez et al. Eurosurveillance 2007, 12: 1 Simon F et coll. Medicine 2007;86: 123-37 Josseran L et coll. Emerg Infect Dis 2006:12:1994-5 6 Multiple joint involvement • Bilateral, symmetrical, distal > 10 joints • Synovitis + periarticular edema + tendonitis +/- joint effusion • Less frequent in the elderly patients Coll.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2010/142017 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 16 December 2010 (16.12.2010) WO 2010/142017 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 48/00 (2006.01) A61P 37/04 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61P 31/00 (2006.01) A61K 38/21 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) Number: International Application DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/CA20 10/000844 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 8 June 2010 (08.06.2010) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (25) Filing Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (26) Publication Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/185,261 9 June 2009 (09.06.2009) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): DE- ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, FYRUS, INC .
    [Show full text]
  • Rousettus Aegyptiacus Amy J
    Schuh et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:128 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1390-z SHORT REPORT Open Access No evidence for the involvement of the argasid tick Ornithodoros faini in the enzootic maintenance of marburgvirus within Egyptian rousette bats Rousettus aegyptiacus Amy J. Schuh1, Brian R. Amman1, Dmitry A. Apanaskevich2, Tara K. Sealy1, Stuart T. Nichol1 and Jonathan S. Towner1* Abstract Background: The cave-dwelling Egyptian rousette bat (ERB; Rousettus aegyptiacus) was recently identified as a natural reservoir host of marburgviruses. However, the mechanisms of transmission for the enzootic maintenance of marburgviruses within ERBs are unclear. Previous ecological investigations of large ERB colonies inhabiting Python Cave and Kitaka Mine, Uganda revealed that argasid ticks (Ornithodoros faini) are hematophagous ectoparasites of ERBs. Yet, their potential role as transmission vectors for marburgvirus has not been sufficiently assessed. Findings: In the present study, 3,125 O. faini were collected during April 2013 from the rock crevices of Python Cave, Uganda. None of the ticks tested positive for marburgvirus-specific RNA by Q-RT-PCR. The probability of failure to detect marburgvirus at a conservative prevalence of 0.1 % was 0.05. Conclusions: The absence of marburgvirus RNA in O. faini suggests they do not play a significant role in the transmission and enzootic maintenance of marburgvirus within their natural reservoir host. Keywords: Filovirus, Marburgvirus, Marburg virus, Tick, Argasid, Ornithodoros, Egyptian rousette bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus, Transmission, Maintenance Findings IgG antibodies [3, 4] and the isolation of infectious mar- Introduction burgvirus [1–3, 5] from ERBs inhabiting caves associated The genus Marburgvirus (Filoviridae), includes a single with recent human outbreaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Clinical, Laboratory and Immune Characteristics of the Monophasic and Biphasic Course of Tick-Borne Encephalitis
    microorganisms Article Comparison of Clinical, Laboratory and Immune Characteristics of the Monophasic and Biphasic Course of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Petra Bogoviˇc 1,2,*, Stanka Lotriˇc-Furlan 1,2, Tatjana Avšiˇc-Županc 3 , Miša Korva 3, Andrej Kastrin 4 , Lara Lusa 4,5, Klemen Strle 6 and Franc Strle 1 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (S.L.-F.); [email protected] (F.S.) 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (T.A.-Ž.); [email protected] (M.K.) 4 Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (L.L.) 5 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia 6 Laboratory of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Division of Infectious Diseases, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 120 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +386-1-522-2110; Fax: +386-1-522-2456 Citation: Bogoviˇc,P.; Lotriˇc-Furlan, Abstract: The biphasic course of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is well described, but information on S.; Avšiˇc-Županc,T.; Korva, the monophasic course is limited. We assessed and compared the clinical presentation, laboratory M.; Kastrin, A.; Lusa, L.; Strle, K.; findings, and immune responses in 705 adult TBE patients: 283 with monophasic and 422 with Strle, F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Characterization and the Generation of a Reverse Genetics System for Kyasanur Forest Disease Virus by Bradley
    The Molecular Characterization and the Generation of a Reverse Genetics System for Kyasanur Forest Disease Virus by Bradley William Michael Cook A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science Department of Microbiology University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Copyright © 2010 by Bradley William Michael Cook 1 List of Abbreviations: AHFV - Alkhurma Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Amp – ampicillin APOIV - Apoi Virus ATP – adenosine tri-phosphate BAC – bacterial artificial chromosome BHK – Baby Hamster Kidney BSA – bovine serum albumin C1 – C-terminus fragment 1 C2 – C-terminus fragment 2 C - Capsid protein cDNA – comlementary Deoxyribonucleic acid CL – Containment Level CO2 – carbon dioxide cHP - capsid hairpin CNS - Central Nervous System CPE – cytopathic effect CS - complementary sequences DENV1-4 - Dengue Virus DIC - Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) DNA – Deoxyribonucleic acid DTV - Deer Tick Virus 2 E - Envelope protein EDTA - ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EM - Electron Microscopy EMCV – Encephalomyocarditis Virus ER - endoplasmic reticulum FBS – fetal bovine serum FP - fusion peptide GGEV - Greek Goat Encephalitis Virus GGYV - Gadgets Gully Virus GMP - Guanosine mono-phosphate GTP - Guanosine tri-phosphate HBV- Hepatitis B Virus HDV – Hepatitis Delta Virus HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus IFN – interferon IRES – internal ribosome entry sequence JEV - Japanese Encephalitis Virus KADV - Kadam Virus kDa -
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Groups: Viruses (C) 1988, American Biological Safety Association
    Rev.: 1.0 Risk Groups: Viruses (c) 1988, American Biological Safety Association BL RG RG RG RG RG LCDC-96 Belgium-97 ID Name Viral group Comments BMBL-93 CDC NIH rDNA-97 EU-96 Australia-95 HP AP (Canada) Annex VIII Flaviviridae/ Flavivirus (Grp 2 Absettarov, TBE 4 4 4 implied 3 3 4 + B Arbovirus) Acute haemorrhagic taxonomy 2, Enterovirus 3 conjunctivitis virus Picornaviridae 2 + different 70 (AHC) Adenovirus 4 Adenoviridae 2 2 (incl animal) 2 2 + (human,all types) 5 Aino X-Arboviruses 6 Akabane X-Arboviruses 7 Alastrim Poxviridae Restricted 4 4, Foot-and- 8 Aphthovirus Picornaviridae 2 mouth disease + viruses 9 Araguari X-Arboviruses (feces of children 10 Astroviridae Astroviridae 2 2 + + and lambs) Avian leukosis virus 11 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 3 (wild strain) + (ALV) 3, (Rous 12 Avian sarcoma virus Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 sarcoma virus, + RSV wild strain) 13 Baculovirus Viral vector/Animal virus 1 + Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 14 Barmah Forest 2 A Arbovirus) 15 Batama X-Arboviruses 16 Batken X-Arboviruses Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 17 Bebaru virus 2 2 2 2 + A Arbovirus) 18 Bhanja X-Arboviruses 19 Bimbo X-Arboviruses Blood-borne hepatitis 20 viruses not yet Unclassified viruses 2 implied 2 implied 3 (**)D 3 + identified 21 Bluetongue X-Arboviruses 22 Bobaya X-Arboviruses 23 Bobia X-Arboviruses Bovine 24 immunodeficiency Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 3 (wild strain) + virus (BIV) 3, Bovine Bovine leukemia 25 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 lymphosarcoma + virus (BLV) virus wild strain Bovine papilloma Papovavirus/
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Table of Contents Welcome Note of the German Research Platform for Zoonoses ........................................................ 2 Welcome Note of the Federal Government ...................................................................................... 3 Program Zoonoses 2019 - International Symposium on Zoonoses Research ...................................... 5 General information ...................................................................................................................... 14 Floor Plan .................................................................................................................................... 18 About the German Research Platform for Zoonoses ........................................................................ 19 Oral Presentations ........................................................................................................................ 20 Plenary Session I: Keynotes .......................................................................................................... 21 Session 1: Innate and Adaptive Immune Response......................................................................... 24 Session 2: Public Health ................................................................................................................ 31 Session 3: New and Re-Emerging Zoonotic Diseases ...................................................................... 38 Session 4: Diagnostics and NGS ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Virus Screening in DNA Samples
    Figure S1. Research of endogeneous viral element (EVE) by virus screening in DNA samples: comparison of Cp values results obtained when detecting the viruses in DNA samples (Light gray) versus Cp values results obtained in the corresponding RNA samples (Dark gray). *: significative difference with p-value < 0.05 (T-test). The S segment of the LTV were found in only one DNA sample and in the corresponding RNA sample. KTV has been detected in one DNA sample but not in the corresponding RNA sample. Figure S2. Luciferase activity (in LU/mL) distribution of measures after LIPS performed in tick/cattle interface for the screening of antibodies specific to Lihan tick virus (LTV), Karukera tick virus (KTV) and Wuhan tick virus 2 (WhTV2). Positivity threshold is indicated for each antigen construct with a dashed line. Table S1. List of tick-borne viruses targeted by the microfluidic PCR system (Gondard et al., 2018) Family Genus Species Asfarviridae Asfivirus African swine fever virus (ASFV) Orthomyxoviridae Thogotovirus Thogoto virus (THOV) Dhori virus (DHOV) Reoviridae Orbivirus Kemerovo virus (KEMV) Coltivirus Colorado tick fever virus (CTFV) Eyach virus (EYAV) Bunyaviridae Nairovirus Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHF) Dugbe virus (DUGV) Nairobi sheep disease virus (NSDV) Phlebovirus Uukuniemi virus (UUKV) Orthobunyavirus Schmallenberg (SBV) Flaviviridae Flavivirus Tick-borne encephalitis virus European subtype (TBE) Tick-borne encephalitis virus Far-Eastern subtype (TBE) Tick-borne encephalitis virus Siberian subtype (TBE) Louping ill virus (LIV) Langat virus (LGTV) Deer tick virus (DTV) Powassan virus (POWV) West Nile virus (WN) Meaban virus (MEAV) Omsk Hemorrhagic fever virus (OHFV) Kyasanur forest disease virus (KFDV).
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of Important Viral Diseases in Africa in Light of the ‘One Health’ Concept
    pathogens Article Systematic Review of Important Viral Diseases in Africa in Light of the ‘One Health’ Concept Ravendra P. Chauhan 1 , Zelalem G. Dessie 2,3 , Ayman Noreddin 4,5 and Mohamed E. El Zowalaty 4,6,7,* 1 School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa; [email protected] 2 School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa; [email protected] 3 Department of Statistics, College of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar 6000, Ethiopia 4 Infectious Diseases and Anti-Infective Therapy Research Group, Sharjah Medical Research Institute and College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, UAE; [email protected] 5 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92868, USA 6 Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, SE 75185 Uppsala, Sweden 7 Division of Virology, Department of Infectious Diseases and St. Jude Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS), St Jude Children Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 February 2020; Accepted: 7 April 2020; Published: 20 April 2020 Abstract: Emerging and re-emerging viral diseases are of great public health concern. The recent emergence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in December 2019 in China, which causes COVID-19 disease in humans, and its current spread to several countries, leading to the first pandemic in history to be caused by a coronavirus, highlights the significance of zoonotic viral diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Pathogenic Virus Induced Immunity Against TBEV Protects Mice from Disease But
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.426200; this version posted January 11, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Low-pathogenic virus induced immunity against TBEV protects mice from disease but 2 not from virus entry into the CNS 3 Monique Petry1, Martin Palus2,3, Eva Leitzen4, Johanna Gracia Mitterreiter5, Bei Huang4, 4 Andrea Kröger6,7,8, Georges M.G.M Verjans9, Wolfgang Baumgärtner4, Guus F. 5 Rimmelzwaan1, Daniel Růžek2,3, Albert Osterhaus1, Chittappen Kandiyil Prajeeth1* 6 Author affiliations 7 1 Research Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 8 Foundation, Bünteweg 17, Hannover 30559, Germany. 9 2 Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, CZ-62100, Brno, Czech Republic 10 3 Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of Czech Academy of Science, Branisovska 31, CZ-37005, 11 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic 12 4 Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 17, 13 Hannover 30559, Germany 14 5 Department of Virology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany 15 6 Innate Immunity and Infection, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124, Braunschweig, 16 Germany 17 7 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger 18 Strasse 44, D-39120, Magdeburg, Germany 19 8 Center of Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany 20 9 Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015GE Rotterdam, The 21 Netherlands 22 23 * Correspondence to 24 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) Virus Presents to the UK Human Population
    Human Animal Infections and Risk Surveillance (HAIRS) group Qualitative assessment of the risk that tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus presents to the UK human population Updated March 2021 1 Qualitative assessment of the risk that TBE virus presents to the UK human population Contents About the Human Animal Infections and Risk Surveillance group ............................................... 3 Version control ............................................................................................................................. 4 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 5 Step One: Assessment of the probability of infection in the UK human population ...................... 6 Outcome of probability assessment........................................................................................ 12 Step two: Assessment of the impact on human health .............................................................. 13 Outcome of impact assessment ............................................................................................. 15 References ................................................................................................................................. 16 Annex A: Assessment of the probability of infection in the UK population algorithm ................. 19 Accessible
    [Show full text]