DOCSLIB.ORG

TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM and RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM and RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Hon. Hedy Fry, Chair FEBRUARY 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission. Also available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Hon. Hedy Fry Chair FEBRUARY 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION NOTICE TO READER Reports from committee presented to the House of Commons Presenting a report to the House is the way a committee makes public its findings and recommendations on a particular topic. Substantive reports on a subject-matter study usually contain a synopsis of the testimony heard, the recommendations made by the committee, as well as the reasons for those recommendations. STANDING COMMITTEE ON CANADIAN HERITAGE CHAIR Hon. Hedy Fry VICE-CHAIRS Hon. Peter Van Loan Pierre Nantel MEMBERS Pierre Breton Jim Eglinski Sean Casey* Stéphane Lauzon* Julie Dabrusin Martin Shields Anju Dhillon Dan Vandal Julie Dzerowicz Arif Virani* * Non-voting member, pursuant to Standing Order 104(5). iii OTHER MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO PARTICIPATED William Amos Bernard Généreux Seamus O’Regan David Anderson Garnett Genius Scott Reid Frank Baylis Cheryl Hardcastle Jean R. Rioux Rachel Blaney Majid Jowhari Ruby Sahota Celina Caesar- Robert Kitchen Darrell Samson Chavannes Hon. Michael D. Chong Jenny Kwan Ramesh Sangha Roger Cuzner Linda Lapointe Scott Simms Pam Damoff Michael Levitt David Sweet Francis Drouin Larry Maguire Mark Warawa Peter Fragiskatos Bryan May Kevin Waugh Colin Fraser Elizabeth May Nick Whalen CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Andrew Bartholomew Chaplin Michael MacPherson LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Gabrielle de Billy Brown Erin Virgint iv THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CANADIAN HERITAGE has the honour to present its TENTH REPORT Pursuant to its mandate under Standing Order 108(2), the Committee has studied Systemic Racism and Religious Discrimination and has agreed to report the following: v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 1 PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .................................................................................. 7 1.1 THE COMMITTEE’S STUDY ................................................................................................... 7 1.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ............................................................ 8 1.2.2 Canadian Human Rights Act ....................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Canadian Multiculturalism Act .................................................................................. 9 1.2.4 Criminal Code ................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.5 United Nations Documents ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.5.1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights .............................................. 10 1.2.5.2 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ............................................................................................ 11 1.3 EXISTING INITIATIVES ....................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................ 14 1.3.1.1 Multiculturalism Program ......................................................................... 14 1.3.1.2 Canadian Race Relations Foundation ................................................... 15 1.3.1.3 Court Challenges Program ........................................................................ 15 1.3.1.4 Office of Human Rights, Freedoms and Inclusion ............................ 16 1.3.2 Provincial ....................................................................................................................... 16 1.4 KEY TERMS .............................................................................................................................. 19 1.4.1 Systemic racism ........................................................................................................... 19 1.4.2 Religious Discrimination.......................................................................................... 21 1.4.3 Islamophobia ................................................................................................................ 22 1.4.4 Intersectionality .......................................................................................................... 24 PART 2: RACE AND RELIGION ISSUES IN CANADA................................................................ 25 2.1 PRESENTATION OF THE CURRENT DATA .................................................................. 25 vii 2.1.1 Police-reported hate crimes ................................................................................... 26 2.1.2 Self-reported hate crimes ........................................................................................ 29 2.2 CHALLENGES WITH COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS ................................................. 30 2.2.1 Underreporting ............................................................................................................ 30 2.2.2 Lack of uniformity ...................................................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Improving reporting .................................................................................................. 32 2.3 RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................ 34 2.4.1 Hate speech, freedom of speech and freedom of conscience ..................... 36 2.4.2 Discrimination related to employment .............................................................. 38 2.4.3 Social discrimination ................................................................................................. 39 2.5 LEGAL CONCERNS RAISED BY WITNESSES................................................................ 41 2.5.1 Criminal Code review ................................................................................................ 41 2.5.2 Facilitate investigation and prosecution of hate crimes.............................. 43 2.5.3 Legislation related to Indigenous Peoples ........................................................ 44 PART 3: MOVING FORWARD........................................................................................................... 46 3.1 NATIONAL ACTION PLAN—A WHOLE OF GOVERNMENT APPROACH .......... 46 3.1.1 Development of a National Strategy ................................................................... 47 3.1.2 Race Equity Lens ......................................................................................................... 49 3.1.3 Benchmarks and Accountability ........................................................................... 52 3.1.4 Intersectionality .......................................................................................................... 53 3.1.5 Cross-jurisdictional cooperation .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Debates of the House of Commons
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) Volume 150 No. 008 Friday, October 2, 2020 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 467 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 2, 2020 The House met at 10 a.m. dence that the judge in their case will enforce sexual assault laws fairly and accurately, as Parliament intended. Prayer [English] It has never been more critical that all of us who serve the public GOVERNMENT ORDERS are equipped with the right tools and understanding to ensure that everyone is treated with the respect and dignity that they deserve, ● (1005) no matter what their background or their experiences. This would [English] enhance the confidence of survivors of sexual assault and the Cana‐ dian public, more broadly, in our justice system. There is no room JUDGES ACT in our courts for harmful myths or stereotypes. Hon. David Lametti (Minister of Justice, Lib.) moved that Bill C-3, An Act to amend the Judges Act and the Criminal Code, be read the second time and referred to a committee. I know that our government's determination to tackle this prob‐ lem is shared by parliamentarians from across Canada and of all He said: Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to stand in support of Bill political persuasions. The bill before us today will help ensure that C-3, an act to amend the Judges Act and the Criminal Code, which those appointed to a superior court would undertake to participate is identical to former Bill C-5.
    [Show full text]
  • April 28, 2020 Honourable Catherine Mckenna Minister of Infrastructure
    April 28, 2020 Honourable Catherine McKenna Minister of Infrastructure and Communities [email protected] Dear Minister McKenna, We write as twenty (20) business organizations representing a broad cross-section of Manitoba’s economy collectively employing tens of thousands of women and men. Those industries include engineering & consulting, heavy civil and 2 vertical construction, commercial and residential development, manufacturing & exporting, retail, agriculture, commercial trucking and skilled trades. Our appeal to the federal government is that it assist in our provincial economic recovery by accelerating the approvals of and flexibility in the allocation from federal programs. Such measures would enable funding of key Manitoba projects that would immediately procure jobs, build legacy assets and be key instruments in help kick-staring Manitoba’s economy. The above is necessary to help correct the lack of confidence in the economy by all its sectors, the alarm, anxiety and fear of what lies ahead around the corner, and indeed where that corner is. That has led to private-sector projects being deferred or outright canceled. Those decision have resulted in lost jobs, supply and equipment sales, all of which reduces the collective ROI to GDP. Addressing consumer and investor confidence is critical to our recovery. In that regard, we understand the Province of Manitoba has communicated its commitment to flow its capital programs, harnessing investment in infrastructure to help Manitoba’s economy recover. We are told Manitoba has more than $6B in project submissions for the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) with many being shovel ready. We urge the federal government to make the most of the current market conditions - competitive bid prices and extraordinarily low interest rates - to meet the formidable economic challenge in front of us.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 8 Most Generous Ridings Giving $$$ to Anti-Choice Groups
    Top 8 Most Generous Ridings Giving What happened $$$ to Anti-Choice Groups with the Canada Summer Jobs Human Rights Wall of Shame program? Individual Members of Parliament can direct Canada In April 2017, the Abortion Summer Jobs funding to Rights Coalition of Canada groups in their ridings. Some reported that many anti- ridings scored consistently choice groups had been getting federal government high for anti-choice grants. funding to hire summer How generous are these students under the Canada ridings to anti-choice groups? Summer Jobs (CSJ) program – about $1.7 Too generous! million since 2010! The top eight alone has given (Here’s the list with $760,000 to them from 2010 amounts and years: to 2017. We dug up the data https://goo.gl/4C1ZsC) below. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Employment Minister Patty Hajdu Riding MP Anti-choice Groups Amount quickly announced that Moncton-Riverview- ● Robert Goguen, ● Pregnancy & Wellness $285.6K Liberal ridings would no Dieppe CPC, to 2015 Centre of Moncton longer award CSJ funding ● Ginette Petitpas- ● Birthright to anti-choice groups, and Taylor, LPC, current that the government would Calgary Centre ● Joan Crockatt, CPC, ● Calgary Pregnancy Care $84.7 K look at ways to to 2015 Centre permanently change the ● Kent Hehr, LPC, program to prevent any current MP from allocating public Calgary Northeast ● Devinder Shory, ● Canadian Centre for Bio- $81.5 K CPC, to 2015 Ethical Reform funds to anti-choice groups. Guelph ● Frank Valeriote, ● Alliance for Life $67.9 K LPC, to 2015 ● Beginnings Family
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2020 Edition of the Erin Mills Quarterly
    2020 SPRING THE ERIN MILLS QUARTERLY IQRA KHALID, MP MISSISSAUGA — ERIN MILLS 2020 Spring Edition LETTER FROM IQRA INSIDE Dear friends, Letter from Iqra 1 I hope your 2020 is off to a fantastic start! On my end it has been a busy time as we tackle important Are you eligible for grants? 1 issues in Ottawa. Updates from 2 Over the past months I’ve had thousands of conversations with the residents of our riding about the Mississauga-Erin Mills issues that most affect life here in Mississauga-Erin Mills. I value your input, both on what our government has done well and what we can improve on, because it helps inform the decisions made in parliament. Tax Season 2020 3 Working together over the last four years, we have brought over $400 million to our riding to support Updates from Ottawa 4 local businesses and organizations, created more opportunities for youth to succeed, and improved the quality of life for our seniors. These accomplishments are shared between all of us in the riding, and I Events with you #WithMyMP 4 look forward to the great work still to come. This year is a lot like starting a new chapter in the story of our lives and our country, and that means looking ahead at the goals we want to set for ourselves and for Canada in the coming decade. Moving forward, we are setting ambitious goals to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, laying the foundations CONTACT for Pharmacare to save you $3 billion on prescriptions, implementing new tax cuts and incentives to help YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT make life more affordable, and maintaining our commitment to human rights and women’s equality in Canada and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 2020 Table of Contents
    October 9, 2020 Table of Contents Research No consensus on broad COVID-19 study during rst HESA meeting of current session INTERVIEW: Health minister Hajdu currently ‘not open to delaying’ drug pricing changes Upcoming Events Webinar: “Using Data to Make Public Health Decisions” Press Releases Intergovernmental Aairs Jack.org Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario Canadian Institutes of Health Research Indigenous Services Canada Statistics Canada The Royal Society of Canada October 9, 2020 RESEARCH No consensus on broad COVID-19 study during rst HESA meeting of current session RESEARCH EXCLUSIVE | OCTOBER 9, 2020 After two and a half hours of continuous debate on the merits of a broad COVID-19 study proposed by Conservative health critic Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill, Alta.), the health committee’s rst meeting was adjourned with no decisions made. Rempel Garner proposed the health committee (HESA) undertake a study to look at 17 different elements, including rapid, at-home testing; vaccine development; long-term care protocols within federal jurisdiction; the Public Health Agency of Canada ’s Global Public Health Intelligence Network; contact tracing protocol; and Canada’s level of preparedness for future pandemics. The motion also proposed that various ministers, including those for health, procurement and public safety, be required to appear before the committee separately for three hours each in order to answer questions about the government’s response to COVID-19. Rempel Garner’s motion was introduced after opposition members of the committee voted to adjourn the debate on a motion presented by Liberal MP and committee member Tony Van Bynen (Newmarket-Aurora, Ont.), who was calling for a study on the mental health impacts of COVID-19 on Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Internship Programme 2020-21 Annual Report
    Parliamentary Internship Programme 2020-21 Annual Report Annual General Meeting Canadian Political Science Association June 11, 2021 Dr. Paul Thomas Director Web: pip-psp.org Twitter: @PIP_PSP Instagram: @pip-psp Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ParlInternship/ PIP Annual Report 2021 Director’s Message I am delighted to present the Parliamentary Internship Programme’s (PIP) 2020-21 Annual Report to the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA). The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reshaped the experience of the 2020-21 internship cohort relative to previous years. Such changes began with a mostly-virtual orientation in September, and continued with remote work in their MP placements, virtual study tours, and Brown-Bag lunches over Zoom. Yet while limiting some aspects of the PIP experience, the pandemic provided opportunities as well. The interns took full advantage of the virtual format to meet with academics, politicians, and other public figures who were inaccessible to previous cohorts relying on in-person meetings. They also learned new skills for online engagement that will serve them well in the hybrid work environment that is emerging as COVID-19 recedes. One thing the pandemic could not change was the steadfast support of the PIP’s various partners. We are greatly indebted to our sponsors who chose to prioritize their contributions to PIPs despite the many pressures they faced. In addition to their usual responsibilities for the Programme, both the PIP’s House of Commons Liasion, Scott Lemoine, and the Programme Assistant, Melissa Carrier, also worked tirelessly to ensure that the interns were kept up to date on the changing COVID guidance within the parliamentary preccinct, and to ensure that they had access to the resources they needed for remote work.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of the Standing Committee on Finance
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION Standing Committee on Finance EVIDENCE NUMBER 034 Thursday, April 15, 2021 Chair: The Honourable Wayne Easter 1 Standing Committee on Finance Thursday, April 15, 2021 ● (1545) Ms. Julie Dzerowicz: Is this first panel a one-hour session or is it [English] an hour and a half? The Chair (Hon. Wayne Easter (Malpeque, Lib.)): I call the The Chair: It will be about an hour and 10 minutes. We want to meeting to order. start the second panel at five o'clock. Welcome to meeting number 34 of the House of Commons Ms. Julie Dzerowicz: Thank you very much. Standing Committee on Finance. Pursuant to the committee's motion adopted on Friday, February The Chair: That's an hour and 12 minutes. 5, 2021, the committee is meeting to study all aspects of COVID-19 spending and programs. On Generation Squeeze, I understand they were in and they were out, and they were in and they were out. We can ask the clerk to Today's meeting is taking place in the hybrid format, pursuant to give the reasons, if he wants. Was any reason given, Mr. Clerk? the House order of January 25, and therefore members are attend‐ ing in person in the room and remotely using the Zoom application. The Clerk of the Committee (Mr. Alexandre Roger): The email didn't give a specific reason, but the witness did say he would like The proceedings will be made available via the House of Com‐ to wait until the budget came out to have more content for his pre‐ mons website.
    [Show full text]
  • CIC Diversity Colume 6:2 Spring 2008
    VOLUME 6:2 SPRING 2008 Guest Editor The Experiences of Audrey Kobayashi, Second Generation Queen’s University Canadians Support was also provided by the Multiculturalism and Human Rights Program at Canadian Heritage. Spring / printemps 2008 Vol. 6, No. 2 3 INTRODUCTION 69 Perceived Discrimination by Children of A Research and Policy Agenda for Immigrant Parents: Responses and Resiliency Second Generation Canadians N. Arthur, A. Chaves, D. Este, J. Frideres and N. Hrycak Audrey Kobayashi 75 Imagining Canada, Negotiating Belonging: 7 Who Is the Second Generation? Understanding the Experiences of Racism of A Description of their Ethnic Origins Second Generation Canadians of Colour and Visible Minority Composition by Age Meghan Brooks Lorna Jantzen 79 Parents and Teens in Immigrant Families: 13 Divergent Pathways to Mobility and Assimilation Cultural Influences and Material Pressures in the New Second Generation Vappu Tyyskä Min Zhou and Jennifer Lee 84 Visualizing Canada, Identity and Belonging 17 The Second Generation in Europe among Second Generation Youth in Winnipeg Maurice Crul Lori Wilkinson 20 Variations in Socioeconomic Outcomes of Second Generation Young Adults 87 Second Generation Youth in Toronto Are Monica Boyd We All Multicultural? Mehrunnisa Ali 25 The Rise of the Unmeltable Canadians? Ethnic and National Belonging in Canada’s 90 On the Edges of the Mosaic Second Generation Michele Byers and Evangelia Tastsoglou Jack Jedwab 94 Friendship as Respect among Second 35 Bridging the Common Divide: The Importance Generation Youth of Both “Cohesion” and “Inclusion” Yvonne Hébert and Ernie Alama Mark McDonald and Carsten Quell 99 The Experience of the Second Generation of 39 Defining the “Best” Analytical Framework Haitian Origin in Quebec for Immigrant Families in Canada Maryse Potvin Anupriya Sethi 104 Creating a Genuine Islam: Second Generation 42 Who Lives at Home? Ethnic Variations among Muslims Growing Up in Canada Second Generation Young Adults Rubina Ramji Monica Boyd and Stella Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Cancellations Put Artists' Livelihoods at Risk; Arts Organizations in Financial Distress
    Prime Minister Justin Trudeau March 17, 2020 ​ Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland The Honourable Steven Guilbeault The Honourable William Francis Morneau Minister of Canadian Heritage Minister of Finance The Honourable Mona Fortier The Honourable Navdeep Bains Minister of Middle-Class Prosperity Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry Associate Minister of Finance The Honourable Mélanie Joly Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages Re: Mass cancellations put artists’ livelihoods at risk; arts organizations in financial distress Dear Prime Minister Trudeau; Deputy Prime Minister Freeland; and Ministers Guilbeault, Morneau, Fortier, Joly, and Bains, We write as the leadership of Opera.ca, the national association for opera companies and professionals in Canada. In light of recent developments around COVID-19 and the waves of cancellations as a result of bans on mass gatherings, Opera.ca is urgently requesting federal aid on behalf of the Canadian opera sector and its artists -- its most essential and vulnerable people -- while pledging its own emergency support for artists in desperate need. Opera artists are the heart of the opera sector, and their economic survival is in jeopardy. In response to the dire need captured by a recent survey conducted by Opera.ca, the board of directors of Opera.ca today voted for an Opera Artists Emergency Relief Fund to be funded by the association. Further details will be announced shortly. Of the 14 professional opera companies in Canada, almost all have cancelled their current production and some the remainder of the season. This is an unprecedented crisis with long-reaching implications for the entire Canadian opera sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the House of Commons
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) Volume 150 No. 092 Friday, April 30, 2021 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 6457 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, April 30, 2021 The House met at 10 a.m. Bibeau Bittle Blaikie Blair Blanchet Blanchette-Joncas Blaney (North Island—Powell River) Blois Boudrias Boulerice Prayer Bratina Brière Brunelle-Duceppe Cannings Carr Casey Chabot Chagger GOVERNMENT ORDERS Champagne Champoux Charbonneau Chen ● (1000) Cormier Dabrusin [English] Damoff Davies DeBellefeuille Desbiens WAYS AND MEANS Desilets Dhaliwal Dhillon Dong MOTION NO. 9 Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Hon. Chrystia Freeland (Minister of Finance, Lib.) moved Duncan (Etobicoke North) Duvall that a ways and means motion to implement certain provisions of Dzerowicz Easter the budget tabled in Parliament on April 19, 2021 and other mea‐ Ehsassi El-Khoury sures be concurred in. Ellis Erskine-Smith Fergus Fillmore The Deputy Speaker: The question is on the motion. Finnigan Fisher Fonseca Fortier If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes to Fortin Fragiskatos request either a recorded division or that the motion be adopted on Fraser Freeland division, I ask them to rise in their place and indicate it to the Chair. Fry Garneau Garrison Gaudreau The hon. member for Louis-Saint-Laurent. Gazan Gerretsen Gill Gould [Translation] Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hardie Mr. Gérard Deltell: Mr. Speaker, we request a recorded divi‐ Harris Holland sion. Housefather Hughes The Deputy Speaker: Call in the members. Hussen Hutchings Iacono Ien ● (1045) Jaczek Johns Joly Jones [English] Jordan Jowhari (The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the Julian Kelloway Khalid Khera following division:) Koutrakis Kusmierczyk (Division No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Layman's Guide to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
    CJPME’s Vote 2019 Elections Guide « Vote 2019 » Guide électoral de CJPMO A Guide to Canadian Federal Parties’ Positions on the Middle East Guide sur la position des partis fédéraux canadiens à propos du Moyen-Orient Assembled by Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Préparé par Canadiens pour la justice et la paix au Moyen-Orient September, 2019 / septembre 2019 © Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Preface Préface Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Canadiens pour la paix et la justice au Moyen-Orient (CJPME) is pleased to provide the present guide on (CJPMO) est heureuse de vous présenter ce guide Canadian Federal parties’ positions on the Middle électoral portant sur les positions adoptées par les East. While much has happened since the last partis fédéraux canadiens sur le Moyen-Orient. Canadian Federal elections in 2015, CJPME has Beaucoup d’eau a coulé sous les ponts depuis les élections fédérales de 2015, ce qui n’a pas empêché done its best to evaluate and qualify each party’s CJPMO d’établir 13 enjeux clés relativement au response to thirteen core Middle East issues. Moyen-Orient et d’évaluer les positions prônées par chacun des partis vis-à-vis de ceux-ci. CJPME is a grassroots, secular, non-partisan organization working to empower Canadians of all CJPMO est une organisation de terrain non-partisane backgrounds to promote justice, development and et séculière visant à donner aux Canadiens de tous peace in the Middle East. We provide this horizons les moyens de promouvoir la justice, le document so that you – a Canadian citizen or développement et la paix au Moyen-Orient.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Creed Research and Consultation Report
    Human Rights and Creed Research and consultation report ISBN: 978-1-4606-3360-1 (Print) 978-1-4606-3361-8 (HTML) 978-1-4606-3362-5 (PDF) © 2013 Queen’s Printer for Ontario Available in various formats Also available online: www.ohrc.on.ca Disponible en français Human rights and creed research and consultation report Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1. Setting the context................................................................................................... 1 2. The purpose of this report........................................................................................ 2 3. Criteria for assessing and developing human rights policy ...................................... 2 II. Executive summary................................................................................................... 3 III. Background and context ......................................................................................... 7 Key questions .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Current social and demographic trends ................................................................... 7 1.1 Diversity of creed beliefs and practices.............................................................. 7 1.2 Individual belief and practice............................................................................ 10 1.3 Policy and program trends ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]