Chapter 13 Stream and Riparian Ecology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 13 Stream and Riparian Ecology Chapter 3 Stream and Riparian Ecology John S. Richardson and R.D. (Dan) Moore INTRODUCTION Water is a valuable resource for humans (direct con- Geomorphology: Fluvial Forms, Processes, and sumption, power, irrigation, industry) and provides Forest Management Effects”). essential habitat for many organisms, including The purpose of this chapter is to provide an highly valued fish species such as salmonids. Aquatic overview of stream and riparian ecology in Brit- habitat is influenced by processes active not only ish Columbia. It describes the ecological structure in the near-stream (riparian) zone (e.g., provision and function of streams and the associated riparian of shade) but also over the entire watershed (e.g., zones, and the interactions between them. Several hillslope hydrologic processes that control the supply topics in this chapter are integrative; therefore, some of water or the generation of landslides). Processes at topics are addressed only briefly but references are both of these scales, and others, can be profoundly provided for more in-depth coverage. For additional influenced by forestry activities, as described in information on stream and riparian ecology, see more detail in Chapter 7 (“The Effects of Forest Giller and Malmqvist (998), Naiman and Bilby (edi- Disturbance on Hydrologic Processes and Watershed tors, 998), Naiman et al. (2005), Allan and Castillo Response”), Chapter 9 (“Forest Management Effects (2007), and Richardson and Danehy (2007). on Hillslope Processes”), and Chapter 0 (“Channel STREAMS Definitions hence, the term stream is used to mean all running waters. Stream channels include the active chan- The word stream”“ is a generic term used to de- nel (or open channel), as well as relict channels that scribe watercourses of all sizes that have channels of may be disconnected from the active channel or running water and which show evidence of fluvial are connected only at high flow. The active chan- processes, even if it is only the erosion of organic nel is characterized by open water interacting with materials during peak runoff events. The term its bed materials (mineral substrate, wood). Below “river” is generally used to describe a large stream and adjacent to the active channel is the hyporheic (e.g., Richardson and Milner 2005). No specific scale zone—a zone of saturated sediments where infiltra- distinguishes a river from a stream, creek, or brook; tion of stream water via the streambed and banks 44 has a strong influence on water quality. It is typically stream in the central interior of British Columbia. the interface between stream water and groundwater The use of various terms to define streams can and, as such, is often characterized as an ecotone cause confusion. For example, “headwaters” is spanning the boundaries of the surface and subsur- sometimes used to refer to the sources of any stream, face environments. The riparian zone is the terrestri- regardless of its size (Gomi et al. 2002; Moore and al area adjacent to the stream. It is influenced by the Richardson 2003). In this chapter, headwater streams water in the stream and (or) has an influence on the are defined as having no perennially flowing tribu- aquatic system (see below). A more comprehensive taries (Gomi et al. 2002; Moore and Richardson discussion of the classification of streams, channel 2003; Richardson and Danehy 2007). This narrow types, and morphology, and the processes that shape definition distinguishes headwaters from networks stream environments is provided in Chapter 0 of streams (Gomi et al. 2002), placing the focus (“Channel Geomorphology: Fluvial Forms, Process- instead on the different processes governing head- es, and Forest Management Effects”). waters versus non-headwaters and on the differ- The duration of surface flow throughout the year ent management strategies available for these two in a given stream will vary from year to year, de- channel types (see Gomi et al. 2002; Richardson and pending on weather patterns. It will also vary among Danehy 2007). streams, and along streams, with smaller streams more likely to have lower flow duration than bigger Influence of Channel Type on Habitat streams. In perennial streams, flow over the stream- bed is usually maintained throughout the year, Channel components such as pools, riffles, steps, although the entire active channel does not have to cascades, and plane beds provide important habitat be inundated (Feminella 996). In general, peren- for many organisms (Chapter 0, “Channel Geo- nial streams are considered distinct from intermit- morphology: Fluvial Forms, Processes, and Forest tent and ephemeral streams along a continuum of Management Effects”). Variations in the hydraulic flow duration (Feminella 996; Halwas et al. 2005). characteristics of different reaches and channel Intermittent and ephemeral channels differ in the sub-units create distinctive habitat characteristics duration of surface flow. Intermittent channels carry that influence the spatial distributions of aquatic water through an extended portion of the year and organisms (Hawkins et al. 993). For example, riffles, may support populations of some benthic inverte- a common channel feature, are characterized by brates with adaptations to this environment. Ephem- relatively high flow velocities. This channel feature is eral channels show evidence of fluvial processes but favoured habitat for a diversity of aquatic organisms have flows only during and shortly after precipitation that filter fine particles of organic matter or prey events (Halwas et al. 2005). from the water column and that require sufficient During extended periods of low flow, the water flow to bring these materials to them. Larval black- table may drop below the streambed because of a flies and net-spinning caddisflies, for example, can combination of reduced runoff generation from filter large masses of particles from passing water upslope areas and transpiration by riparian vegeta- (Wallace and Merritt 980), removing this load of tion. Under these conditions, sections of streams organic material from water supplies and thus pro- dry up wherever stream discharge is insufficient to viding an important ecosystem service. Fish often maintain continuous surface flow and to satisfy wa- require particular channel features during different ter losses through the streambed and banks. Stream life cycle stages. Adult salmonids (Pacific salmon, drying may occur frequently in the upper portions trout, char) generally use riffles for spawning redds, of the channel network, which can interrupt con- whereas juvenile salmonids usually inhabit pools. nectivity (Hunter et al. 2005). For example, Story et Within these pools, young salmon take advantage of al. (2003) found that dewatering of an intermediate cover behind boulders or logs, finding refuge from segment of stream channel effectively decoupled a the full hydraulic force of the channel flow but still lower reach from the warming effects of harvesting having ready access to prey carried along in the cur- and road construction on an upper reach of a small rent (i.e., “drift”). 442 HYPORHEIC ZONES Hydrology important for salmon redds, where the through-flow of surface water maintains high dissolved oxygen. Hyporheic exchange flow refers to the transfer of This topic is covered in more detail in Chapter 4 stream water through the streambed and banks (“Salmonids and the Hydrologic and Geomorphic (recharge), the down-valley transport of this water Features of Their Spawning Streams in British Co- within the saturated zone surrounding the stream lumbia”). channel, and the subsequent discharge from the sub- Hyporheic exchange flow is controlled primarily surface back into the channel (Figure 3.). Hyporhe- by the morphology of the valley floor and stream ic exchange flow occurs in response to variations in channel (Harvey and Bencala 993; Wroblicky et al. hydraulic potential along the streambed and banks 998; Kasahara and Wondzell 2003; Gooseff et al. and takes place at a range of spatial and temporal 2006; Wondzell 2006). In steep headwater streams, scales. For example, at a small scale, water pressure hyporheic exchange flow can be controlled by is often higher on the upstream side of bedforms boulder or log steps in the longitudinal profile of the than on the downstream side; the resulting hydrau- stream (Kasahara and Wondzell 2003; Anderson et lic gradient induces infiltration of stream water on al. 2005). The volume of sediment stored above these the upstream side of the bedform and discharge on steps largely determines the extent of the hyporheic the downstream side. This type of exchange flow is zone. Downwelling stream water seeps into the FIGURE 3. A stream reach showing many of the elements and processes that link streams and riparian areas (E. Leinberger, University of British Columbia). 443 streambed upstream of the steps and returns to the zone. Because of the contributions of channel and stream channel below the steps, where it upwells hillslope water, hyporheic zones are biogeochemi- through the streambed (Harvey and Bencala 993; cally distinct from groundwater. For example, the Moore et al. 2005b; Scordo and Moore 2009). hyporheic zone tends to have enhanced dissolved In streams with riffle-pool morphology, channel oxygen, particularly near the recharge zones where water tends to flow into the streambed and banks at oxygenated channel water infiltrates the stream- the riffle heads and discharge back into the stream bed and banks (Ward et al. 998). The contrasts in the downstream pools (Harvey and Bencala in biogeochemistry between groundwater and the 993; Kasahara and Wondzell 2003; Anderson et hyporheic zone are particularly important in rela- al. 2005). In larger, unconstrained streams with tion to nitrogen processing. Information on nitro- relatively wide and flat floodplains, exchange flows gen cycling in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is occur through mid-channel bars. Stream water flows provided in Chapter 2 (“Water Quality and Forest into the bars through the streambed and bank on Management”). the upstream side, and returns to the stream chan- The hyporheic zone is often thermally interme- nel on the downstream side (Vervier and Naiman diate between surface water and groundwater.
Recommended publications
  • Ecological Issues in Floodplains and Riparian Corridors
    Final White Paper Research Project T1803 Task 29 Riparian Corridor ECOLOGICAL ISSUES IN FLOODPLAINS AND RIPARIAN CORRIDORS by Susan M. Bolton Jeff Shellberg Associate Professor and Director Research Assistant Center for Streamside Studies University of Washington, Bx 352100 Seattle, Washington 98195 Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 University District Building 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Patricia Lynch Environmental Affairs Prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration July 2001 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 524.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Ecological Issues in Floodplains and Riparian Corridors July 2001 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Susan M. Bolton and Jeff Shellberg 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. University District Building; 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Agreement T1803, Task 29 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Research Office Washington State Department of Transportation Final white paper Transportation Building, MS 47370 Olympia, Washington 98504-7370 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE James Toohey, Project Manager, 360-705-0885 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. ABSTRACT This white paper examines and synthesizes the literature pertaining to the current state of knowledge on the physical and biological effects of alluvial river channelization, channel confinement, and various channel and floodplain modifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for Riparian Buffers
    Website: Aberdeen Plant Materials Center http://plant-materials.nrcs.usda.gov Plants for Riparian Buffers P.O. Box 296, Aberdeen, ID 83210 Phone:(208) 397-4133 Fax:(208) 397-3104 What is a Riparian Buffer? Many farmers, ranchers and land managers have a growing concern over water quality issues. Riparian buffers are one of the most important practices that you can use to help control non- point pollution and improve water quality. Riparian buffers are the grasses, grass-like, forbs, shrubs, trees or other vegetation growing along streams. These plants control erosion and help filter and keep water clean. Cropland fields shouldn’t be planted right up to a stream’s edge where the soil is generally more fragile and subject to erosion. A healthy riparian buffer between cropland and a river system Shrubs, trees and other vegetation protect the stream from pollutants and runoff. They absorb excess nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus from farm and livestock operations. Plants protect the stream banks from erosion by providing a protective barrier against the water. The trunks, branches, stems and leaves intercept the water currents that can weaken and wash away bank material. In addition to protecting water and soil, riparian buffers provide important habitat for aquatic and upland wildlife and also fish habitat. The information contained in this brochure will help you select the best shrubs and trees for installing riparian buffers on your farm or ranch. The plants listed are all highly recommended for use in the Intermountain West and Rocky Mountain States. Included are tips for planning riparian buffers and areas, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center Service area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Ecoregions of the United States
    (iii) ~ Agrl~:::~~;~":,c ullur. Description of the ~:::;. Ecoregions of the ==-'Number 1391 United States •• .~ • /..';;\:?;;.. \ United State. (;lAn) Department of Description of the .~ Agriculture Forest Ecoregions of the Service October United States 1980 Compiled by Robert G. Bailey Formerly Regional geographer, Intermountain Region; currently geographer, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and originally published as an unnumbered publication by the Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah In April 1979, the Agency leaders of the Bureau of Land Manage­ ment, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Geological Survey, and Soil Conservation Service endorsed the concept of a national classification system developed by the Resources Evaluation Tech­ niques Program at the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, to be used for renewable resources evaluation. The classifica­ tion system consists of four components (vegetation, soil, landform, and water), a proposed procedure for integrating the components into ecological response units, and a programmed procedure for integrating the ecological response units into ecosystem associations. The classification system described here is the result of literature synthesis and limited field testing and evaluation. It presents one procedure for defining, describing, and displaying ecosystems with respect to geographical distribution. The system and others are undergoing rigorous evaluation to determine the most appropriate procedure for defining and describing ecosystem associations. Bailey, Robert G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, 77 pp. This publication briefly describes and illustrates the Nation's ecosystem regions as shown in the 1976 map, "Ecoregions of the United States." A copy of this map, described in the Introduction, can be found between the last page and the back cover of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood Canal Riparian Landscapes: Early Historical Condition and Ecological Changes
    Hood Canal riparian landscapes: early historical condition and ecological changes Ted Labbe, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Ashley Adams, Independent Consultant Bob Conrad, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe Natural Resources Department 31912 Little Boston Road NE Kingston, WA 98346 June 12, 2006 Executive Summary Though limited in spatial extent, riparian forests are among the most dynamic and diverse environments in the Pacific Northwest. At the interface between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, riparian environments host an array of critical plant and animal species, enrich the region’s aesthetic landscape, and support an array of crucial ecological services like nutrient processing/transformation, water quality protection, and flood hazard reduction. Our knowledge of riparian forest ecology has expanded rapidly over the last 30 years. However, there is little information on historical changes to riparian forests and this knowledge gap hinders effective ecosystem management. In this study, we combined archival land survey records and contemporary field surveys to reconstruct historical riparian forest conditions and chart ecosystem change in Hood Canal, Washington. Historical General Land Office (GLO) surveys (c. 1870) for Hood Canal and adjacent areas were integrated with a 1910 timber cruise survey for the 60 km2 Dewatto watershed in a GIS. Field surveys at 80 riparian sites were used to validate our approach and to chart historical vegetation composition change. Comparisons among historical land surveys and with a contemporary vegetation inventory revealed potential bias in historical survey records. To account for these biases we limited our analyses and capitalized on the complementary nature of the historical surveys, using the GLO records for forest composition and the 1910 timber cruise for forest age and spatial structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Systems
    Riparian Systems January 2007 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Leaflet Number 45 Introduction Riparian areas are transitional zones between terres- trial and aquatic systems exhibiting characteristics of both systems. They perform vital ecological functions linking terrestrial and aquatic systems within water- sheds. These functions include protecting aquatic eco- systems by removing sediments from surface runoff, decreasing flooding, maintaining appropriate water conditions for aquatic life, and providing organic ma- terial vital for productivity and structure of aquatic ecosystems. They also provide excellent wildlife hab- itat, offering not only a water source, but food and shelter, as well. NRCS Soils in riparian areas differ from soils in upland areas because they are formed from sediments with differ- ent textures and subjected to fluctuating water levels and degrees of wetness. These sediments are rich in nutrients and organic matter which allow the soils to retain large amounts of moisture, affecting the growth and diversity of the plant communities. Riparian areas typically are vegetated with lush growths of grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees that are tolerant of periodic flooding. In some regions (Great Plains), however, trees may not be part of the his- toric riparian community. Areas with saline soils or U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service heavy, nearly-anaerobic soils (wet meadow environ- ments and high elevations) also are dominated by her- baceous vegetation. In intermittent waterways, the ri- parian area may be confined to the stream channel. Threats to riparian areas have come from many sourc- es. Riparian forests and bottomlands are fertile and valued farmland and rangeland, as well as prime wa- ter-front property desired by developers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services in Temperate Rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA ⇑ Patric Brandt A,B, , David J
    Biological Conservation 169 (2014) 362–371 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Multifunctionality and biodiversity: Ecosystem services in temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA ⇑ Patric Brandt a,b, , David J. Abson c, Dominick A. DellaSala d, Robert Feller b, Henrik von Wehrden b,c a Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate - Atmospheric Environmental Research, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany b Leuphana University Lüneburg, Centre for Methods & Institute of Ecology, Faculty of Sustainability, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany c Leuphana University Lüneburg, FuturES Research Center, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany d Geos Institute, 84-4th St., Ashland, OR 97520, USA article info abstract Article history: Forests produce a myriad of ecosystem related benefits known as ecosystem services. Maximizing the Received 1 August 2013 provision of single goods may lead to the overexploitation of ecosystems that negatively affects biodiver- Received in revised form 30 October 2013 sity and causes ecosystem degradation. We analyzed the temperate rainforest region of the Pacific North- Accepted 2 December 2013 west, which offers a multitude of ecosystem services and harbors unique biodiversity, to investigate Available online xxxx linkages and trade-offs between ecosystem services and biodiversity. We mapped nine actual and poten- tial ecosystem services, grouped into provision, supporting, regulating and cultural ecosystem service Keywords: categories, as well as species richness of four taxonomic groups (mammals, birds, trees, and amphibians). Biodiversity conservation We analyzed linkages and tradeoffs between ecosystem services, their overall diversity, and species rich- Ecosystem management Ecosystem service diversity ness as well as different levels of taxon diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Canopy: a Guide to the Rainforests Of
    NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Under the Canopy A guide to the rainforests of NSW 1 Contents What are rainforests? ........................................................................... 3 How did Australian rainforests originate? .................................... 4 What determines where rainforests occur? ................................ 5 The types of rainforest in New South Wales .............................. 6 Special features of rainforest plants .............................................. 8 The animals living in our rainforests ............................................. 10 Regeneration under the canopy .................................................... 12 The status of rainforest conservation in NSW ......................... 13 How can we all help preserve the rainforest? .......................... 14 World Heritage ...................................................................................... 15 Where does rainforest occur in New South Wales?.............. 16 1 Richmond – Tweed .................................................................... 18 2 Washpool & Gibraltar ................................................................ 20 3 Dorrigo – New England ............................................................22 4 Sea Acres ....................................................................................... 24 5 Barrington and Gloucester Tops .......................................... 26 6 Minnamurra ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Temperate Rainforest Exploration Package
    COASTAL TEMPERATE RAINFOREST Explore B.C.’s rainforest with fun activities such as artwork, storytelling & poetry! Illustrations by Illustrations by Amira Maddison Amira Maddison HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE BUILD YOUR OWN ADVENTURE This booklet will help you discover the story of the coastal temperate rainforests in British Columbia. The content is designed primarily for students in Grades 3-5. Use this booklet as a guide to explore forests in your area and prompt questions about their history and current use. Colour in the pictures as you go along. Printing: If you don’t have access to a printer, simply follow along on a device and complete the activities on blank paper or in your own nature journal. Take the time to acknowledge that the land you live on has been stewarded by Indigenous peoples for millennia before the arrival of Europeans and other immigrants. Indigenous peoples around the world continue to steward the land and waters, benefiting all lifeforms. If you don’t know the names of the Indigenous Nations who have traditionally called the area you live home, take the time to read about them online. Learn about territories, language and treaties in your area at native-land.ca/ Fill in the blank to write the names of the Indigenous peoples who have traditionally called the area you live home: TAKE ONLY MEMORIES LEAVE ONLY FOOTPRINTS Leave no trace. What does the three-word slogan really mean? Simply put, it is the best practice to follow to enjoy and respect our natural spaces. It means a lot more than just packing out your garbage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Scale, Multi- Proxy Assessment of the Resilience of Cool Temperate Rainforest to Fire in Victoria’S Central Highlands
    18 Fire on the mountain: A multi-scale, multi- proxy assessment of the resilience of cool temperate rainforest to fire in Victoria’s Central Highlands Patrick J. Baker School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria [email protected] Rohan Simkin Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Nina Pappas Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Alex McLeod Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Merna McKenzie Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Introduction A common feature of many Australian landscapes is the interdigitation of eucalypt- dominated sclerophyll forest with rainforest. In most instances, the eucalypt forests dominate the landscape, with rainforest restricted to relatively small fragments and strips that are often (but not always) associated with topographic features such as riparian zones or southeastern- facing slopes. However, these patterns reflect the current state of a dynamic system. Over several terra australis 34 376 Patrick J. Baker et al. hundreds of thousands of years, the relative dominance of the rainforests and eucalypt forests has waxed and waned across these landscapes in near synchrony (Kershaw et al. 2002; Sniderman et al. 2009). During periods of relatively warm, dry conditions, the eucalypt- dominated vegetation has expanded and the rainforest contracted across the landscape. When the climate has been relatively cool and moist, the rainforests have expanded and the eucalypt forest contracted. This is, in part, thought to be a direct consequence of the ambient environmental conditions and their impact on regeneration success. However, the indirect influence of climate, in particular as a driver of fire regimes, may be as important, if not more important, in defining the structure, composition and relative abundance of rainforest and eucalypt taxa at the landscape scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Succession Begins with a Total Lack of Organisms and Bare Mineral Surfaces Or Water
    Environmental Science A Study of Interrelationships Twelfth Edition Enger & Smith Chapter 6 Kinds of Ecosystems and Communities Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Kinds of Ecosystems and Communities Outline . Succession . Biomes Are Determined by Climate . Major Aquatic Ecosystems Succession . Succession is a series of regular, predictable changes in community structure over time. Activities of organisms change their surroundings and make the environment suitable for other kinds of organisms. A climax community is a relatively stable, long- lasting community that is the result of succession. The kind of climax community that develops is primarily determined by climate. Succession . Primary succession begins with a total lack of organisms and bare mineral surfaces or water. Secondary succession begins with the disturbance of an existing ecosystem. • It is much more commonly observed, and generally proceeds more rapidly than primary succession. Primary Succession . Terrestrial primary succession • A pioneer community is a collection of organisms able to colonize bare rock (e.g., lichens). – Lichens help break down rock and accumulate debris, helping to form a thin soil layer. – The soil layer begins to support small forms of life. Primary Succession Pioneer organisms Primary Succession . Lichen community replaced by annual plants. Annuals replaced by perennial community. Perennial community replaced by shrubs. Shrubs replaced by shade-intolerant trees. Shade-intolerant trees replaced by shade-tolerant trees. Stable, complex, climax community eventually reached. • Each step in the process is known as a successional (seral) stage, and the sequence of stages is called a sere. Primary Succession Primary succession on land Primary Succession . Climax communities show certain characteristics when compared with successional communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Model of Riparian Forest Restoration for Natural Flood Management Simon J
    Water and Environment Journal. Print ISSN 1747-6585 A conceptual model of riparian forest restoration for natural flood management Simon J. Dixon1 , David A. Sear2 & Keith H. Nislow3 1Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; 2Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; and 3USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, UMASS, Amherst, Massachusetts. Keywords Abstract ecohydrology, forest, large wood, natural flood management, restoration There is an increasing emphasis on using natural processes, including riparian forest restoration, to enhance the ecological, hydrological and geomorphological Correspondence functioning of watercourses. However, we have insufficient knowledge on how Simon J. Dixon, School of Geography, Earth the supply and retention of in-channel wood from riparian forest stands changes and Environmental Sciences, Birmingham with age, with inferences typically based on data from terrestrial forests. This Institute of Forest Research, University of presents a challenge in estimating the efficacy and functional lifespan of restora- Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Email: tion projects. In this paper, we use a riparian forest growth model to show there [email protected] is a lag of up to 40–50 years between the start of forest growth and trees doi:10.1111/wej.12425 delivering wood to the channel that is large enough to resist fluvial transport, anchor logjams and so increase channel complexity and hydraulic
    [Show full text]