Haplosyllis Review 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Haplosyllis Review 2009 A taxonomic revision of the genus Haplosyllis Langerhans, 1887 Haplosyllis violaceo-flava (Grube, 1878)........................................................................................................................ 35 Haplosyllis spongicola brevicirra (Rioja, 1941) ............................................................................................................. 35 (Polychaeta: Syllidae: Syllinae) Nomina dubia .................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Haplosyllis maderensis Czerniavsky, 1881 ...................................................................................................................... 35 Haplosyllis oligochaeta massiliensis Czerniavsky, 1881 ................................................................................................. 36 Haplosyllis oligochaeta pontica Czerniavsky, 1881 ......................................................................................................... 36 Haplosyllis palpata Verrill, 1900 ...................................................................................................................................... 36 1, 2 1 PATRICIA LATTIG & DANIEL MARTIN Taxa that do not belong to Haplosyllis............................................................................................................................... 36 Alcyonosyllis bisetosa (Hartmann-Schröder, 1960) new comb. ....................................................................................... 36 Alcyonosyllis gorgoniacola (Sun & Yang, 2004) new comb. .......................................................................................... 36 1Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Carrer d’accés a la Cala Sant Francesc 14, 17300 Blanes Alcyonosyllis xeniaecola (Hartmann-Schröder, 1993) ...................................................................................................... 37 (Girona), Catalunya, Spain 2Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM). 2Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Trypanosyllis depressa (Augener, 1913) .......................................................................................................................... 37 Facultad de Ciencias, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Trypanosyllis dollfusi (Fauvel, 1933) new comb. ............................................................................................................. 37 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ 37 References ....................................................................................................................................................... 38 Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Material and methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 The genus Haplosyllis Langerhans, 1887 is revised based on available types and newly collected specimens. 19 Systematics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 species are considered as valid, five as incertae sedis and four are referred to nomina dubia. Trypanoseta Genus Haplosyllis Langerhans, 1879 .................................................................................................................................. 7 (Imajima, 1966) is synonymised with Haplosyllis, as the presence of trepan is considered a non-robust Key to the Haplosyllis species ............................................................................................................................................ 8 taxonomic feature, affecting H. ohma new comb. (Imajima & Hartman, 1964) and H. granulosa new comb. Haplosyllis agelas Uebelacker, 1982 .................................................................................................................................. 9 (Lattig, San Martín & Martín, 2007). Haplosyllis streptocephala (Grube, 1857) is a new combination and two Haplosyllis anthogorgicola Utinomi, 1956 ....................................................................................................................... 10 species are considered to belong to Alcyonosyllis Glasby & Watson, 2001: A. bisetosa new comb. (Hartmann- Haplosyllis basticola Sardá, Ávila & Paul, 2002 .............................................................................................................. 11 Schröder, 1960) and A. gorgoniacola new comb. (Sun & Yang, 2004). All valid species are described and Haplosyllis carmenbritoae Lattig, San Martín & Martin, 2007 ........................................................................................ 13 figured except those described during the last decade, which only includes diagnoses and chaetae illustrations. A Haplosyllis cephalata Verrill, 1900 ................................................................................................................................... 13 dichotomous key to all valid species of Haplosyllis is provided. Haplosyllis chamaeleon (Laubier, 1960)............................................................................................................................ 15 Haplosyllis crassicirrata Aguado, San Martín & Nishi, 2006 .......................................................................................... 16 Haplosyllis cratericola Buzhinskaja, 1990......................................................................................................................... 17 Key words: Haplosyllis, Syllidae, taxonomy, revision, identification key Haplosyllis djiboutiensis Gravier, 1900 ............................................................................................................................ 18 Haplosyllis granulosa (Lattig, Martin & San Martín, 2007) new comb. ......................................................................... 20 Haplosyllis gula Treadwell, 1924 ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Haplosyllis loboi Paola, San Martín & Martin, 2006 ........................................................................................................ 23 Haplosyllis ohma (Imajima & Hartman, 1964) new comb. .............................................................................................. 23 Haplosyllis spongicola (Grube, 1855) ............................................................................................................................... 25 Haplosyllis spongiphila (Verrill, 1885) ............................................................................................................................. 27 Haplosyllis streptocephala (Grube, 1857) new comb. ...................................................................................................... 29 Haplosyllis trifalcata (Day, 1960) ...................................................................................................................................... 30 Haplosyllis uncinigera (Grube, 1878) ................................................................................................................................ 32 Haplosyllis villogorgicola Martin, Núñez, Riera & Gil, 2002 ........................................................................................... 34 Haplosyllis Incertae sedis .................................................................................................................................................. 34 Haplosyllis aurantiaca (Eisig, 1881) .................................................................................................................................. 34 Haplosyllis hamata (Claparède, 1868) .............................................................................................................................. 35 Haplosyllis oligochaeta (Bobretzky, 1870) ........................................................................................................................ 35 1 2 Introduction chaetal morphology. Among them, H. basticola Sardá, Ávila & Paul, 2002; H. villogorgicola Martin, Núñez, Riera & Gil, 2002; H. loboi Paola, San Martín, & Martin, 2006; H. The genus Haplosyllis Langerhans, 1887 (Polychaeta, Syllidae, Syllinae) has an unresolved carmenbritoae Lattig, San Martín & Martin, 2007 and H. granulosa (Lattig, San Martín & taxonomy; it is characterized by the articulated cirri, palps fused only at bases and the simple Martin, 2007). bidentate chaetae. The genus is relatively small, includes 19 species, 5 incertae sedis and 4 The assignation of species to Haplosyllis has been traditionally based on the presence nomina dubia (present study). Together with Alcyonosyllis Glasby & Watson, 2001, of simple bifid chaetae (being always similar in appearance), and the cirri length (described as Haplosyllides Augener, 1924 Parahaplosyllis
Recommended publications
  • Annelida, Phyllodocida)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 488: 1–29Guide (2015) and keys for the identification of Syllidae( Annelida, Phyllodocida)... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.488.9061 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Guide and keys for the identification of Syllidae (Annelida, Phyllodocida) from the British Isles (reported and expected species) Guillermo San Martín1, Tim M. Worsfold2 1 Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Laboratorio de Biología Marina e Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain 2 APEM Limited, Diamond Centre, Unit 7, Works Road, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire SG6 1LW, UK Corresponding author: Guillermo San Martín ([email protected]) Academic editor: Chris Glasby | Received 3 December 2014 | Accepted 1 February 2015 | Published 19 March 2015 http://zoobank.org/E9FCFEEA-7C9C-44BF-AB4A-CEBECCBC2C17 Citation: San Martín G, Worsfold TM (2015) Guide and keys for the identification of Syllidae (Annelida, Phyllodocida) from the British Isles (reported and expected species). ZooKeys 488: 1–29. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.488.9061 Abstract In November 2012, a workshop was carried out on the taxonomy and systematics of the family Syllidae (Annelida: Phyllodocida) at the Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, Tynemouth, UK for the National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control (NMBAQC) Scheme. Illustrated keys for subfamilies, genera and species found in British and Irish waters were provided for participants from the major national agencies and consultancies involved in benthic sample processing. After the workshop, we prepared updates to these keys, to include some additional species provided by participants, and some species reported from nearby areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Branchipolynoe
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Branchipolynoe (Polynoidae, Phyllodocida, Aciculata, Annelida), with Descriptions of Five New Species from Methane Seeps and Hydrothermal Vents Johanna Lindgren, Avery Hatch, Stéphane Hourdez, Charlotte Seid, Greg Rouse To cite this version: Johanna Lindgren, Avery Hatch, Stéphane Hourdez, Charlotte Seid, Greg Rouse. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Branchipolynoe (Polynoidae, Phyllodocida, Aciculata, Annelida), with Descriptions of Five New Species from Methane Seeps and Hydrothermal Vents. Diversity, MDPI, 2019, 11 (9), pp.153. 10.3390/d11090153. hal-02313505 HAL Id: hal-02313505 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02313505 Submitted on 11 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. diversity Article Phylogeny and Biogeography of Branchipolynoe (Polynoidae, Phyllodocida, Aciculata, Annelida), with Descriptions of Five New Species from Methane Seeps and Hydrothermal Vents Johanna Lindgren 1, Avery S. Hatch 1, Stephané Hourdez 2, Charlotte A. Seid 1 and Greg W. Rouse 1,* 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Loandalia (Polychaeta: Pilargidae)
    Zootaxa 1119: 59–68 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1119 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) New species of Loandalia (Polychaeta: Pilargidae) from Queensland, Australia SHONA MARKS1 & SCOTT HOCKNULL2 1 S. A. Marks. CSIRO Marine Research, PO Box 120, Cleveland QLD 4163. [email protected]. 2 S. A. Hocknull. Queensland Museum, 122 Gerler Rd Hendra QLD 4711. [email protected] Abstract Two new species of Loandalia are described from Queensland, Australia. Loandalia fredrayorum sp. nov. is described from Moreton Bay, south eastern Queensland and is distinguished from all other species of Loandalia by the presence of singular palpostyles; uniramous parapodia at chaetiger 1; an emergent notopodial spine at chaetiger 9; neurochaetae numbering 20–24; ventral cirri begin on chaetiger 7 and the pygidium with two lateral papillae-like anal cirri. Loandalia gladstonensis sp. nov. is described from Gladstone Harbour, central eastern Queensland and is distinguished from all other species of Loandalia by the presence of bifid palpostyles; chaetiger 1 uniramous with remaining chaetigers biramous; an emergent notopodial spine from chaetiger 7–8; ventral cirri present from chaetiger 5 and neurochaetae numbering 5–6. Key words: Loandalia fredrayorum sp. nov., Loandalia gladstonensis sp.nov., Pilargidae, Queensland, Australia, new species, systematics. Introduction Saint-Joseph (1899) established the Pilargidae for the new species Pilargis verrucosa Saint-Joseph. Prior to this, pilargids had been placed in several different families including the Syllidae, Hesionidae and Polynoidae (Licher & Westheide 1994). Recent cladistic analyses of the Phyllodocida firmly recognise Pilargidae as a distinct clade (Glasby 1993; Pleijel & Dahlgren 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Neanthes Limnicola Class: Polychaeta, Errantia
    Phylum: Annelida Neanthes limnicola Class: Polychaeta, Errantia Order: Phyllodocida, Nereidiformia A mussel worm Family: Nereididae, Nereidinae Taxonomy: Depending on the author, Ne- wider than long, with a longitudinal depression anthes is currently considered a separate or (Fig. 2b). subspecies to the genus Nereis (Hilbig Trunk: Very thick segments that are 1997). Nereis sensu stricto differs from the wider than they are long, gently tapers to pos- genus Neanthes because the latter genus terior (Fig. 1). includes species with spinigerous notosetae Posterior: Pygidium bears two, styli- only. Furthermore, N. limnicola has most form ventrolateral anal cirri that are as long as recently been included in the genus (or sub- last seven segments (Fig. 1) (Hartman 1938). genus) Hediste due to the neuropodial setal Parapodia: The first two setigers are unira- morphology (Sato 1999; Bakken and Wilson mous. All other parapodia are biramous 2005; Tusuji and Sato 2012). However, re- (Nereididae, Blake and Ruff 2007) where both production is markedly different in N. limni- notopodia and neuropodia have acicular lobes cola than other Hediste species (Sato 1999). and each lobe bears 1–3 additional, medial Thus, synonyms of Neanthes limnicola in- and triangular lobes (above and below), called clude Nereis limnicola (which was synony- ligules (Blake and Ruff 2007) (Figs. 1, 5). The mized with Neanthes lighti in 1959 (Smith)), notopodial ligule is always smaller than the Nereis (Neanthes) limnicola, Nereis neuropodial one. The parapodial lobes are (Hediste) limnicola and Hediste limnicola. conical and not leaf-like or globular as in the The predominating name in current local in- family Phyllodocidae. (A parapodium should tertidal guides (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistema Arrecifal
    PROGRAMA DE MANEJO México l Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano es uno de los parques nacionales con características marinas más reconocidas en México por su ubicación, estructura, resiliencia y biodiversidad, está integrado por las islas de Enmedio, Santiaguillo, Verde, Sacricios y Salmedina; al menos 45 arrecifes coralinos, de los que algunos presentan lagunas arrecifales con pastos marinos, así como playas y bajos. Se ubican en la porción interna de la plataforma continental en el Golfo de México y se elevan desde profundidades cercanas a los 40 metros. El Programa de Manejo es el instrumento rector de planeación y regulación que establece las actividades, acciones y lineamientos básicos para el manejo y administración del área en el corto, mediano y largo plazo. En este sentido, establece las acciones que permiten asegurar el equilibrio y la continuidad de los procesos ecológicos, salvaguardar la diversidad genética de las especies, el aprovechamiento racional de los recursos y proporcionar un campo propicio para la investigación cientíca y el estudio del ecosistema, permitiendo integrar la conservación de la riqueza natural con el bienestar social y el Parque Nacional desarrollo económico. Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano El Programa de Manejo del Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano tiene la importante misión de proteger la diversidad del Área Natural Protegida, mantener el acervo Sistema Arrecifal genético natural y fomentar el desarrollo sustentable de los recursos renovables presentes, permitiendo el disfrute de los servicios ambientales y de esparcimiento que presta a los usuarios. Es por ello que en su proceso de elaboración se realizaron reuniones de discusión y consenso con los involucrados en el manejo y uso del área considerando las Veracruzano necesidades de todos los sectores implicados, con base en los lineamientos legales establecidos y la argumentación técnica de soporte.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alitta Virens (M
    Alitta virens (M. Sars, 1835) Nomenclature Phylum Annelida Class Polychaeta Order Phyllodocida Family Nereididae Synonyms: Nereis virens Sars, 1835 Neanthes virens (M. Sars, 1835) Nereis (Neanthes) varia Treadwell, 1941 Superseded combinations: Nereis (Alitta) virens M Sars, 1835 Synonyms Nereis (Neanthes) virens Sars, 1835 Distribution Type Locality Manger, western Norway (Bakken and Wilson 2005) Geographic Distribution Boreal areas of northern hemisphere (Bakken and Wilson 2005) Habitat Intertidal, sand and rock (Blake and Ruff 2007) Description From Hartman 1968 (unless otherwise noted) Size/Color: Large; length 500-900 mm, width to 45 mm for up to 200 segments (Hartman 1968). Generally cream to tan in alcohol, although larger specimens may be green in color. Prostomium pigmented except for white line down the center (personal observation). Body: Robust; widest anteriorly and tapering posteriorly. Prostomium: Small, triangular, with 4 eyes of moderate size on posterior half. Antennae short, palps large and thick. Eversible proboscis with sparse paragnaths present on all areas except occasionally absent from Area I (see “Diagnostic Characteristics” section below for definition of areas). Areas VII and VIII with 2-3 irregular rows. 4 pairs of tentacular cirri, the longest extending to at least chaetiger 6. Parapodia: First 2 pairs uniramous, reduced; subsequent pairs larger, foliaceous, with conspicuous dorsal cirri. Chaetae: Notochetae all spinigers; neuropodia with spinigers and heterogomph falcigers. Pygidium: 2 long, slender anal cirri. WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1 of 5 2/26/2018 Diagnostic Characteristics Photo, Diagnostic Illustration Characteristics Photo, Illustrations Credit Marine Sediment Monitoring Team 2 pairs of moderately-sized eyes Prostomium and anterior body region (dorsal view); specimen from 2015 PSEMP Urban Bays Station 160 (Bainbridge Basin, WA) Bakken and Wilson 2005, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Polychaete Worms Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera
    THE POLYCHAETE WORMS DEFINITIONS AND KEYS TO THE ORDERS, FAMILIES AND GENERA THE POLYCHAETE WORMS Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera By Kristian Fauchald NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY In Conjunction With THE ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Science Series 28 February 3, 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHARACTERS USED TO DEFINE HIGHER TAXA 2 CLASSIFICATION OF POLYCHAETES 7 ORDERS OF POLYCHAETES 9 KEY TO FAMILIES 9 ORDER ORBINIIDA 14 ORDER CTENODRILIDA 19 ORDER PSAMMODRILIDA 20 ORDER COSSURIDA 21 ORDER SPIONIDA 21 ORDER CAPITELLIDA 31 ORDER OPHELIIDA 41 ORDER PHYLLODOCIDA 45 ORDER AMPHINOMIDA 100 ORDER SPINTHERIDA 103 ORDER EUNICIDA 104 ORDER STERNASPIDA 114 ORDER OWENIIDA 114 ORDER FLABELLIGERIDA 115 ORDER FAUVELIOPSIDA 117 ORDER TEREBELLIDA 118 ORDER SABELLIDA 135 FIVE "ARCHIANNELIDAN" FAMILIES 152 GLOSSARY 156 LITERATURE CITED 161 INDEX 180 Preface THE STUDY of polychaetes used to be a leisurely I apologize to my fellow polychaete workers for occupation, practised calmly and slowly, and introducing a complex superstructure in a group which the presence of these worms hardly ever pene- so far has been remarkably innocent of such frills. A trated the consciousness of any but the small group great number of very sound partial schemes have been of invertebrate zoologists and phylogenetlcists inter- suggested from time to time. These have been only ested in annulated creatures. This is hardly the case partially considered. The discussion is complex enough any longer. without the inclusion of speculations as to how each Studies of marine benthos have demonstrated that author would have completed his or her scheme, pro- these animals may be wholly dominant both in num- vided that he or she had had the evidence and inclina- bers of species and in numbers of specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Odontosyllis (Annelida, Syllidae): a Recent and Rapid Radiation of Marine Bioluminescent Worms
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/241570; this version posted January 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Molecular phylogeny of Odontosyllis (Annelida, Syllidae): A recent and rapid radiation of marine bioluminescent worms. AIDA VERDES1,2,3,4, PATRICIA ALVAREZ-CAMPOS5, ARNE NYGREN6, GUILLERMO SAN MARTIN3, GREG ROUSE7, DIMITRI D. DEHEYN7, DAVID F. GRUBER2,4,8, MANDE HOLFORD1,2,4 1 Department of Chemistry, Hunter College Belfer Research Center, The City University of New York. 2 The Graduate Center, Program in Biology, Chemistry and Biochemistry, The City University of New York. 3 Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. 4 Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History. 5 Stem Cells, Development and Evolution, Institute Jacques Monod. 6 Department of Systematics and Biodiversity, University of Gothenburg. 7 Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego. 8 Department of Natural Sciences, Weissman School of Arts and Sciences, Baruch College, The City University of New York Abstract Marine worms of the genus Odontosyllis (Syllidae, Annelida) are well known for their spectacular bioluminescent courtship rituals. During the reproductive period, the benthic marine worms leave the ocean floor and swim to the surface to spawn, using bioluminescent light for mate attraction. The behavioral aspects of the courtship ritual have been extensively investigated, but little is known about the origin and evolution of light production in Odontosyllis, which might in fact be a key factor shaping the natural history of the group, as bioluminescent courtship might promote speciation.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Cryptic Species of Neanthes (Annelida: Phyllodocida: Nereididae)
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2015 RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY Supplement No. 31: 75–95 Date of publication: 10 July 2015 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A039A3A6-C05B-4F36-8D7F-D295FA236C6B A new cryptic species of Neanthes (Annelida: Phyllodocida: Nereididae) from Singapore confused with Neanthes glandicincta Southern, 1921 and Ceratonereis (Composetia) burmensis (Monro, 1937) Yen-Ling Lee1* & Christopher J. Glasby2 Abstract. A new cryptic species of Neanthes (Nereididae), N. wilsonchani, new species, is described from intertidal mudflats of eastern Singapore. The new species was confused with both Ceratonereis (Composetia) burmensis (Monro, 1937) and Neanthes glandicincta Southern, 1921, which were found to be conspecific with the latter name having priority. Neanthes glandicincta is newly recorded from Singapore, its reproductive forms (epitokes) are redescribed, and Singapore specimens are compared with topotype material from India. The new species can be distinguished from N. glandicincta by slight body colour differences and by having fewer pharyngeal paragnaths in Areas II (4–8 vs 7–21), III (11–28 vs 30–63) and IV (1–9 vs 7–20), and in the total number of paragnaths for all Areas (16–41 vs 70–113). No significant differences were found in the morphology of the epitokes between the two species. The two species have largely non-overlapping distributions in Singapore; the new species is restricted to Pleistocene coastal alluvium in eastern Singapore, while N. glandicinta occurs in western Singapore as well as in Malaysia and westward to India. Key words. polychaete, new species, taxonomy, ragworm INTRODUCTION Both species are atypical members of their respective nominative genera: N.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Nereididae Marine Sediment Monitoring
    Family Nereididae Marine Sediment Monitoring Puget Sound Polychaetes: Nereididae Family Nereididae Family-level characters (from Hilbig, 1994) Prostomium piriform (pear-shaped) or rounded, bearing 2 antennae, two biarticulate palps, and 2 pairs of eyes. Eversible pharynx with 2 sections, the proximal oral ring and the distal maxillary ring which possesses 2 fang-shaped, often serrated terminal jaws; both the oral and maxillary rings may bear groups of papillae or hardened paragnaths of various sizes, numbers, and distribution patterns. Peristomium without parapodia, with 4 pairs of tentacular cirri. Parapodia uniramous in the first 2 setigers and biramous thereafter; parapodia possess several ligules (strap-like lobes) and both a dorsal cirrus and ventral cirrus. Shape, size, location of ligules is distinctive. They are more developed posteriorly, so often need to see ones from median to posterior setigers. Setae generally compound in both noto- and neuropodia; some genera have simple falcigers (blunt-tipped setae)(e.g., Hediste and Platynereis); completely lacking simple capillary setae. Genus and species-level characters The kind and the distribution of the setae distinguish the genera and species. The number and distribution of paragnaths on the pharynx. Unique terminology for this family Setae (see Hilbig, 1994, page 294, for pictures of setae) o Homogomph – two prongs of even length where the two articles of the compound setae connect. o Heterogomph – two prongs of uneven length where the two articles of the compound setae connect. o Spinigers - long articles in the compound setae. o Falcigers – short articles in the compound setae. o So, there can be homogomph falcigers and homogomph spinigers, and heterogomph falcigers and heterogomph spinigers.
    [Show full text]
  • Title the SYLLIDAE (POLYCHAETOUS ANNELIDS
    THE SYLLIDAE (POLYCHAETOUS ANNELIDS) FROM Title JAPAN (VI) -DISTRIBUTION AND LITERATURE- Author(s) Imajima, Minoru PUBLICATIONS OF THE SETO MARINE BIOLOGICAL Citation LABORATORY (1967), 14(5): 351-368 Issue Date 1967-01-25 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/175453 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University THE SYLLIDAE (POLYCHAETOUS ANNELIDS) FROM JAPAN (VI)* DISTRIBUTION AND LITERATURE MINORU IMAJIMA National Science Museum, Japan With 4 MaPs and 4 Tables Distribution of Syllidae in the Uraga Strait at the entrance to Tokyo Bay Tokyo Bay is situated on the Pacific coast of the central part of the Japanese main island, Honshu. The bay is embraced by two peninsulas, the Miura Peninsula on the west, and the Boso Peninsula on the east. It is connected with the open ocean at the mouth of Sagami Bay by a narrow strip of water, the Uraga Strait. A submerged gorge, known as the Tokyo Submarine Canyon, cuts the shelf deeply in the strait. However the canyon does not reach the main basin of Tokyo Bay and terminates rather abruptly midway in the strait, where it becomes narrower and shallower (330-100 m). The water in the Uraga Strait is much influenced by the coastal water of Tokyo Bay (HoRIKOSHI, 1962). Surveys were made by Dr. M. HORIKOSHI, of the Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo to provide information on the benthonic communities of Tokyo Bay. 127 stations were taken in this area. The bottom samples obtained by dredg­ ing were washed in a sieve of 1 rom standard mesh and then classified into several animal groups.
    [Show full text]