DOCSLIB.ORG

Life on Parade. the Contrast of Appearance and Reality in Ford

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive - Università di Pisa UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PISA Dipartimento di Filologia, Letteratura e Linguistica Corso di laurea specialistica in Letterature e Filologie Europee TESI DI LAUREA Life on parade. The Contrast of Appearance and Reality in Ford Madox Ford's Parade's End Relatore: Dott. Fausto Ciompi Candidato Jessica Tini ANNO ACCADEMICO 2013-14 Index Ford Madox Ford: An Introduction ............................................................................. 3 Part 1. The Text: a Stylistic and Thematic Analysis .................................................. 35 1. Structure and Style of the Tetralogy .................................................................. 35 2. The Contrast Between Appearance and Reality ................................................ 45 3. Marriage, Sexuality and the Role of Women .................................................... 64 4. War, Patriotism and Pacifism: The Final Holocaust .......................................... 83 5. Faith, Hope and the Failure of Religion ............................................................ 90 6. England, Toryism and the Relevance of Pastoral .............................................. 97 Part 2. Tom Stoppard’s Parade’s End ..................................................................... 102 Bibliography ............................................................................................................ 112 2 Ford Madox Ford: An Introduction The first biography of Ford was published in 1948 under the title The Last Pre- Raphaelite; the author, Douglas Goldring, had known Ford personally. Both Stella Bowen and Violet Hunt wrote about the man they had a relationship with, in Drawn From Life (1984) and The Flurried Years (1926) respectively. 1965 was the year in which Frank MacShane published Life and Works of Ford Madox Ford, and in 1971 Arthur Mizener published The Saddest Story: A Biography of Ford Madox Ford. 1980 was the year of Thomas G. Moser’s The Life and Fiction of Ford Madox Ford, and in 1991 Alan Judd appeared as the author of a biography (simply titled Ford Madox Ford), which is the main source of my brief overview. In 2012, Max Saunders published Ford’s latest biography, a book in two volumes entitled Ford Madox Ford: A Dual Life, which takes into account recently discovered papers.1 More biographical studies will be listed at the end of the dissertation. Ford Hermann Hueffer was born on the 17th December 1873 in Merton, Surrey. His father was a German intellectual, with a Roman Catholic background. He was also a francophile, a trait he passed on to his son. The latter was named Ford because of his maternal grandfather, Ford Madox Brown, the famous Pre-Raphaelite painter (who was born in France, and was himself a francophile). His mother, Catherine, had been an artist and was a very intelligent and cultivated woman. The Brown family was related with the Rossettis, because William Rossetti, brother to Christina and Dante Gabriel, had married Catherine’s sister Lucy, and as a young boy Ford was educated and often spent time with his Rossetti cousins.2 1 AA VV, “Ford Madox Ford”, in Concise Dictionary of British Literary Biography: Contemporary Writers, edited by Matthew Joseph Bruccoli, Gale Research, vol. 5, Late Victorian and Edwardian Characters, p. 109, and A. Judd, Ford Madox Ford, London, HarperCollins, 1991, p. 451. 2 Judd, op. cit., p. 13. 3 His father was an atheist, but Ford developed an interest in Roman Catholicism, and was baptized in Paris in 1892. Nonetheless, he was ambiguously religious: he was always critical towards matters of faith and, apparently, went to church only when he was in France and Germany. He married an Anglican woman, and late in his life lived with a Jew; on his deathbed, he refused to see a priest and to receive the last rites.3 When he was young, he was very close to his maternal grandfather, and he and his brother Oliver went to live with him after their father’s untimely death. Ford Madox Brown taught him to «[b]eggar yourself rather than refuse assistance to any one whose genius you think shows promise of being greater than your own». 4 Generosity, self- effacement and sacrifice were to be mingled in him with great editorial skills, that made of him one of the greatest editors and talent scouts of his time.5 Ford began writing at a very young age, and was a very prolific author, so it is not surprising that the quality of his books is uneven.6 His first works included three fairy stories (The Brown Owl, The Feather and The Queen Who Flew, followed in 1906 by the collection Christina’s Fairy Book), a novel, The Shifting of the Fire (a book about the destructiveness of passion, a theme originally derived from Rossetti and the Pre- Raphaelites but that was to recur in all his work), and a collection of poems, The Questions at the Well, published under pseudonym; all these were published between 1891 and 1894.7 His main literary achievement of this period is a volume of descriptive history, The Cinque Ports. Published in 1900, it betrays the author’s early interest in analysing the English country and his people, an attitude that would have his greatest fulfilment in the 3 Ibidem, pp. 12-9 and p. 441. 4 F. M. Hueffer, Ancient Lights and Certain New Reflections: Being the Memories of a Young Man, London, Chapman and Hall, 1911, p. 198. 5 Ibidem, p. 30, and Concise DLBL, cit., pp. 112-3. 6 K. Young, Ford Madox Ford, London/New York/Toronto, Longmans, Green & Co., 1956, p. 7. 7 Judd, op. cit., pp. 33, 36-7 and 18. 4 trilogy England and the English (1905-7). It is a historical description of the five English towns that formed the ancient Confederation of the Cinque Ports, but it had also literary ambitions. Another important work of Ford’s early period, attesting his love for his recently-deceased grandfather, is Ford Madox Brown’s biography.8 In 1894, at the age of twenty, Ford married the seventeen-year-old Elsie Martindale, and they went to live in the Sussex countryside, where they made the acquaintance of, among others, Stephen Crane, H. G. Wells, Arthur Marwood and – most notably – Joseph Conrad.9 Ford met Conrad in September 1898, and the two men influenced, supported and wrote to each other until Conrad died, in 1924 (he was 41 when they met, while Ford was only 24). They collaborated on three books, The Inheritors (1901), Romance (1903) and The Nature of a Crime (published in 1924, but written between 1906 and 1909). It was in particular Ford who helped Conrad in many ways, economically and morally, promoting his work and helping him with the English language; but it was Conrad’s influence that allowed Ford to emancipate from the Pre-Raphaelite style and develop a more modern writing. Their collaboration did not perhaps produce great literature, but their discussions and experimentation on literary techniques were to provide the basis for the development of Modernist literature.10 From the very beginning of his career, Ford was concerned with the matters of the novel and its way of portraying reality.11 Having grown up in non-conformist family that 8 Ibidem, pp. 48, 91, 18. 9 Ibidem, pp. 44-128. 10 Ibidem, pp. 62-8 and 80-7, Concise DLBL, op. cit., p. 114, G. Smith, Ford Madox Ford, New York/London, Columbia University Press, 1972, pp. 11-5, Young, op. cit., pp. 12-3, V. Fortunati, Ford Madox Ford. Teoria e tecnica narrativa, Bologna, Patron, 1975, pp. 26-7. It was Conrad who asked Ford for his help, as it is recalled by the latter in Thus to Revisit: «It is, say, twenty-two years and six months since, about Michaelmas, 1897, I received from Mr. Conrad a letter in which, amazingly, he asked me to collaborate with him», Hueffer, Thus to Revisit. Some Reminiscences, New York, E. P. Dutton and Company, 1921, pp. 26-7. 11 Smith, op. cit., p. 4. 5 gave him a continental education, he was critical towards the contemporary London literary establishment; later, through the collaboration with Conrad, he committed to creating a modern novel that would be as true as possible to reality. He saw English novels as antiquated, excessively didactic and moralizing, and English novelists as more concerned in defending obsolete and anachronistic moral values than in creating a believable and realistic portrait of life.12 He exposed his views on the matter in his private correspondence as well as in various essays and (auto)biographical accounts, namely Ancient Lights and Certain New Reflections (1911, re-published the same year under the title of Memories and Impressions), The Critical Attitude (1911, a collection of articles published in the literary review he directed in 1908-9, The English Review), the critical biography Henry James (1914), Thus to Revisit (1921), Joseph Conrad. A Personal Remembrance (1924), The English Novel (1929), Return to Yesterday (1931), It Was the Nightingale (1933), Provence (1935), Portraits from Life (1937) and The March of Literature (1938). Ford exposed the ideas that were adopted and elaborated during the collaboration with Conrad mainly in Joseph Conrad: A Personal Remembrance, a reminiscence in the form of a novel and a literary essay,13 written in a very short time after the death of his friend, and in the article “Techniques”, published in 1939 in the American Southern Review. It contains a detailed account of their achievements and discussions, and therefore we will presently give a brief analysis of it, although its publication is chronologically distant from the actual period of their collaboration. 12 F. MacShane, “Introduction” to Critical Writings of Ford Madox Ford, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1964, pp. x-xi. 13 In the author’s own words, Joseph Conrad «is a novel, not a monograph; a portrait, not a narration: for what it shall prove to be worth, a work of art, not a compilation», Ford, “Preface” to Joseph Conrad.
Recommended publications
  • FORD MADOX FORD and the YOUNG LOVELL Paul Skinner

    FORD MADOX FORD and the YOUNG LOVELL Paul Skinner

    ‘PRETTY BIG AND SERIOUS’: FORD MADOX FORD AND THE YOUNG LOVELL Paul Skinner Introduction There is a peculiar fascination about the work that borders – chrono- logically and sometimes thematically – on an acknowledged master- piece. The Marsden Case, Ford’s 1923 novel, touches on many of the themes of Some Do Not . and preceded it by less than a year, while, just before The Good Soldier, there was – exactly one hundred years ago – The Young Lovell.1 From his hotel in St. Rémy-de-Provence in March 1913, Ford wrote to his agent, James Pinker: ‘Let me whisper into your secretive ear that the novel I am now writing is going to be one of the great historical novels of the world; no doubt you will let that fact be reflected in the contract that I understand you to be making for me’.2 And, again to Pinker, two weeks later: The title of the book is, for the time being, ‘The Young Lovell’, a Romance of the Borders. The date is towards the end of the XVth Century, running up to the beginnings of the Reformation, though it isn’t in that sense concerned with religion. The action takes place in Northumberland and the story contains any number of things concerning ‘The Percy out of Northum- berland’, the Bishops Palatine of Durham, the besieging of castles, border raids, and so on with what is called ‘a strong element of the supernatural’ and a vigorous love interest. This is rather putting the matter in terms of advertisement, but the book will be, when it is done, a pretty big and serious historical work, rather like ‘The Fifth Queen’, but, in a sense, more romantic.
  • FORD MADOX FORD's ROLE in the ROMANTICIZING of the BRITISH NOVEL a C C E P T E D of T^E Re<3Uirements

    FORD MADOX FORD's ROLE in the ROMANTICIZING of the BRITISH NOVEL a C C E P T E D of T^E Re<3Uirements

    FORD MADOX FORD’S ROLE IN THE ROMANTICIZING OF THE BRITISH NOVEL by James Beresford Scott B.A., University of British Columbia, 1972 M.A., University of Toronto, 1974 A Dissertation Submitted In Partial Fulfillment ACCEPTED of T^e Re<3uirements For The Degree Of FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES doctor of PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English a - k k i We**accept this dissertation as conforming TWT1 / / ".... to the recruired standard Dr. C .DDoyle.l^upSr visor fDeoartment of English) Dr/ j/LouisV^ebarKtffiQiiEhr’ffSmber (English) Dr. D . S. jfhatcher, Department Member iEnglish) Dr. J. Mohey^ Outside^ Mem^er (History) Dr. pA.F. Arend, Outside Member (German) Dr. I.B. Nadel, External Examiner (English, UBC) ® JAMES BERESFORD SCOTT, 1992 University Of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. I . i Supervisor: Dr. Charles D. Doyle ABSTRACT Although it is now widely accepted that the Modern British novel is grounded in Romantic literary practice and ontological principles, Ford Madox Ford is often not regarded as a significant practitioner of (and proselytizer for) the new prose aesthetic that came into being near the start of the twentieth century. This dissertation argues that Ford very consciously strove to break away from the precepts that had informed the traditional novel, aiming instead for a non- didactic, autotelic art form that in many ways is akin to the anti-neoclassical art of the British High Romantic poets. Ford felt that the purpose of literature is to bring a reader into a keener apprehension of all that lies latent in the individual sell?— a capacity that he felt had atrophied in a rational, rule-abiding, industrialized culture.
  • PDF-Export Per Menü Datei / Als PDF Freigeben

    PDF-Export Per Menü Datei / Als PDF Freigeben

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Boyer, Robert Working Paper How and Why Capitalisms Differ MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 05/4 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Boyer, Robert (2005) : How and Why Capitalisms Differ, MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 05/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19918 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR GESELLSCHAFTSFORSCHUNG MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/4 How and Why Capitalisms Differ PDF-Export per Menü Datei / Als PDF freigeben..
  • Competence, Knowledge, and the Labour Market. the Role of Complementarities

    Competence, Knowledge, and the Labour Market. the Role of Complementarities

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gatti, Donatella Working Paper Competence, knowledge, and the labour market: the role of complementarities WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS I 00-302 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Gatti, Donatella (2000) : Competence, knowledge, and the labour market: the role of complementarities, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS I 00-302, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44107 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu discussion paper FS I 00 - 302 Competence, Knowledge, and the Labour Market The role of complementarities Donatella Gatti February 2000 ISSN Nr.
  • INTRODUCTION Rob Hawkes

    INTRODUCTION Rob Hawkes

    INTRODUCTION Rob Hawkes Some Do Not . (1924), No More Parades (1925), A Man Could Stand Up – (1926), and Last Post (1928), known collectively as Parade’s End, have long been recognised – alongside The Good Soldier (1915) – as Ford Madox Ford’s finest achievements as a novelist. Indeed, many regard the tetralogy not just as Ford’s best, but as one of the very best works of the twentieth century. Writing in the New Statesman in 2010, for example, John N. Gray described Parade’s End as ‘possibly the greatest 20th-century novel in Eng- lish’.1 Very often, furthermore, those who have celebrated Parade’s End have been distinguished writers in their own right: W. H. Auden observed that: ‘There are not many English novels which deserve to be called great: Parade’s End is one of them’; Anthony Burgess called Ford’s masterpiece ‘the finest novel about the First World War’; and Malcolm Bradbury described it as ‘a central Modernist novel of the 1920s, in which it is exemplary’.2 The risk of emphasising remarks like these, however, is that they foster a sense of Ford as a ‘writer’s writer’ who fails to engage a wider audience. The suspicion, in other words, may be that despite the ringing endorsements of well-known luminaries – or perhaps even because of them – the appeal of the text in question might be purely esoteric, alienating readers lacking the literary pedigree of an Auden, a Bradbury, or a Burgess. For some, highlighting the novel’s modernism, as Bradbury does, might also mark the text out as part of an inaccessible, elitist, and deliberately alienating project, hostile towards mass audiences (in line with the view most forcefully expressed by John Carey in The Intellectuals and the Masses).3 Burgess focuses on the other major lens though which Parade’s End has frequently been viewed: the First World War.
  • An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism

    An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism

    An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism Peter A. Hall and David Soskice _______________________________________________________________________ Political economists have long been interested in institutional variation across countries. Some regard the institutional differences among nations as deviations from ‘best practice’ that can be expected to decline as countries catch up to the technological and organizational leader. Others see them as the distillation of more durable historical choices for a particular kind of economy and society, since economic institutions are closely linked to the levels of social protection, distribution of income, and collective goods that reflect a nation’s conception of social solidarity. From either perspective, comparative political economy requires conceptual frameworks for identifying and understanding the most important variations in institutions across nations. On such frameworks hang the answers to a range of important questions. Some of these are policy-related. What kinds of macroeconomic, industrial or social policies will improve the performance of the economy? What should governments be expected to do in the face of economic challenges and what defines a state’s capabilities? Others are firm- related. Are there systematic differences in the structure and strategy of companies located in different countries and, if so, what conditions them? How are cross-national differences in the character of innovation to be explained? Institutional differences also affect economic performance. Do some forms of economic organization provide lower rates of inflation and unemployment or higher rates of growth? What are the economic trade-offs to developing one type of political economy rather than another? Finally, there are second-order questions about institutional change and stability of special importance today.
  • PO/IE 318 – GERMANY in the GLOBAL ECONOMY IES Abroad Berlin DESCRIPTION: This Course Introduces Students to the German Economi

    PO/IE 318 – GERMANY in the GLOBAL ECONOMY IES Abroad Berlin DESCRIPTION: This Course Introduces Students to the German Economi

    PO/IE 318 – GERMANY IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY IES Abroad Berlin DESCRIPTION: This course introduces students to the German economic and political model with a special focus on Germany’s role in the European and global economy. The first part of the course will focus on Germany’s history, economy and politics, while the second part puts more emphasis on contemporary issues and the role of Germany within the European Union (EU). The course will also look into global economic governance, particularly the global trade regime, from the perspective of Germany and the EU. At the end of this course, students will be prepared to assess the specifics of the German economy embedded in Europe and the world: How did Germany become the third largest export economy in the world? What is the role of government for its economic success? How have the Deutschmark and, later, the Euro and the broader process of European integration affected the German economy? How have politics and the ideology of the government affected German economy throughout its history? What is the impact of German trade surpluses on its European and global partners? These are just few of the questions that the class will aim to answer. The interdisciplinary approach of this course, combining political science, economics, history, and international political economy will give students a broad picture of salient topics that determine the German economic model. CREDITS: 3 CONTACT HOURS: 45 LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION: English PREREQUISITES: None ADDITIONAL COST: None METHOD OF PRESENTATION: There are no preconditions for enrolling in this course. The lecturer seeks to spark intellectual curiosity and interest in understanding social phenomena by applying an interdisciplinary approach.
  • Curriculum Vitae David Soskice

    Curriculum Vitae David Soskice

    Curriculum Vitae David Soskice 309 Perkins Lib Durham, NC 27708 (email) Education PhD Oxford University 1969 M.A. 1968 Studies Nuffield College, Oxford 1967 Studies Trinity College, Oxford 1964 B.A. (PPE) PPE 1964 Studies Winchester College 1961 Areas of Research Western Europe, Political Economy, and Labor Markets Professional Experience / Employment History London School of Economics Centennial Professor, , 2004−2007 Department of Political Science, Yale University Visiting Professor, , Spring Semester 2004 Berlin (WZB) Research Professor, Wissenschaftszentrum fur Sozialforschung, 2004−2007 (Until retirement, 2007) Duke University Research Professor, Department of Political Science, 2001−2008 each Spring semester European Union Scholar, , March 1999 University of Wisconsin at Madison Marshall−Monnet Lecturer, , September 1999 Australian National University Adjunct Research Professor, Research School of the Social Studies, 1998−2009 University of Trento Guest Professor, Department of Social Sciences, November 1995 to work with Professors Esping−Andersen and Regini University College, University of Oxford Emeritus Fellow in Economics, , 1993 University of Oxford Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Economics and Statistics, 1990−1992 Wissenschaftszentrum fur Sozialforschung, Berlin (WZB) Director, Research Area: Employment and Economic Change, 1990−2001 University College, Oxford; and CUF Lecturer, University of Oxford Fellow (from 1979, the Mynor Fellow) and Tutor in Economics, , 1967−1990 (from 1979, the Mynors Fellow) and Tutor in
  • Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems THOMAS R

    Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems THOMAS R

    American Political Science Review Vol. 101, No. 3 August 2007 DOI: 10.1017/S0003055407070384 Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems THOMAS R. CUSACK Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin TORBEN IVERSEN Harvard University DAVID SOSKICE Duke University and University of Oxford he standard explanation for the choice of electoral institutions, building on Rokkan’s seminal work, is that proportional representation (PR) was adopted by a divided right to defend its class T interests against a rising left. But new evidence shows that PR strengthens the left and redistribution, and we argue the standard view is wrong historically, analytically, and empirically. We offer a radically different explanation. Integrating two opposed interpretations of PR—–minimum winning coalitions versus consensus—–we propose that the right adopted PR when their support for consensual regulatory frameworks, especially those of labor markets and skill formation where co-specific investments were important, outweighed their opposition to the redistributive consequences; this occurred in countries with previously densely organized local economies. In countries with adversarial industrial relations, and weak coordination of business and unions, keeping majoritarian institutions helped contain the left. This explains the close association between current varieties of capitalism and electoral institutions, and why they persist over time. hy do advanced democratic countries have ments (Iversen and Soskice 2006), higher government different electoral systems? The uniformly spending (Bawn and Rosenbluth 2006; Persson and Waccepted view among comparativists is that Tabellini 2004), less inequality (Crepaz 1998; Rogowski the social cleavages that existed at the start of the and MacRae 2004), and more redistribution (Austen- twentieth century shaped the institutional choices of Smith 2000; Iversen and Soskice 2006).
  • A Journey Into Ford Madox Ford's Parade's

    A Journey Into Ford Madox Ford's Parade's

    Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Culturali Comparati Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Lingue e Letterature Americane e Postcoloniali European Joint Master’s Degree in English and American Studies A Journey into Ford Madox Ford’s Parade’s End Supervisor Ch. Prof. Flavio Gregori Assistant supervisor Ch. Prof. Václav Paris The City College of New York Graduand Anna Chiari Matriculation Number 840186 Academic Year 2015 / 2016 1 Table of contents: 1. INTRODUCTION: ______________________________________________________ 3 2. PARADE’S END: _______________________________________________________ 7 3. MODE OF NARRATION: _______________________________________________ 13 4. THE CHRONOTOPE: __________________________________________________ 36 5. TIME OF NARRATION: ________________________________________________ 43 6. THE POLYPHONY AND THE DIALOGISM: __________________________________ 60 7. CONCLUSIONS: ______________________________________________________ 82 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY: ______________________________________________________ 85 2 1. INTRODUCTION: According to Virginia Woolf, the early part of the twentieth century was a period of breaking, falling, crashing and destruction, as she observed: “On or about December 1910 human character changed''. Indeed, between 1900 and 1940 there were many revolutionary developments in science and art. In 1900, Sigmund Freud published his The Interpretation of Dreams, based on the concept of unconscious processes and childhood psychological experiences. In addition, in 1905, Albert Einstein presented his theory of relativity stating that time and space are not absolute and distinct entities but are relative to motion. In 1910, José Ortega y Gasset, a Spanish philosopher, introduced the idea of perspectivism, according to which there are as many spaces and realities as there are points of view. Moreover, three major philosophical developments of that period, Bergsonism, William James’ pragmatism and Martin Heidegger’s phenomenology, focused on how human consciousness experiences the world.
  • Advanced Capitalist Democracies by Torben Iversen and David Soskice CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

    Advanced Capitalist Democracies by Torben Iversen and David Soskice CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

    Advanced Capitalist Democracies CHAPTER 1: By Torben Iversen and David Soskice INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction Much of the literature on advanced capitalist democracies over the past two decades has painted a critical and pessimistic picture of advanced capitalism, and – closely linked – of the future of democracy in advanced societies. In this view, the advanced capitalist democratic state has weakened over time because of globalization and the diffusion of neoliberal ideas. With advanced business seen as major driver and exponent, this has led to liberalization, privatization, deregulation, and intensified global competition. In Esping-Andersen’s striking metaphor, it is markets against politics. This explains, inter alia, why there has been a rise in inequality (labor is weakened) and why this rise has not been countered by increased redistribution. If governments attempted such redistribution, the argument goes, it would cause footloose capital to flee. In Piketty’s hugely influential account, the power of capital to accumulate wealth is governed by fundamental economic laws which democratically elected governments cannot effectively counter. Democratic politics is reduced to symbolic politics; the real driver of economic outcomes is capitalism. In this book we argue that the opposite is true. Over time the advanced capitalist democratic state has paradoxically become strengthened through globalization, and we explain why at length in this book. The spread of neoliberal ideas, we argue, reflects the demand of decisive voters from the middle and upper middle classes to fuel economic growth, wealth, and opportunity in the emerging knowledge economy. The “laws” of capitalism driving wealth accumulation are in fact politically manufactured.
  • Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: an Empirical Analysis

    Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: an Empirical Analysis

    B.J.Pol.S. 39, 449–482 Copyright r 2009 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0007123409000672 Printed in the United Kingdom First published online 1 May 2009 Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis PETER A. HALL AND DANIEL W. GINGERICH* This article provides a statistical analysis of core contentions of the ‘varieties of capitalism’ perspective on comparative capitalism. The authors construct indices to assess whether patterns of co-ordination in the OECD economies conform to the predictions of the theory and compare the correspondence of institu- tions across subspheres of the political economy. They test whether institutional complementarities occur across these subspheres by estimating the impact of complementarities in labour relations and corporate governance on growth rates. To assess the durability of varieties of capitalism, they report on the extent of institutional change in the 1980s and 1990s. Powerful interaction effects across institutions in the subspheres of the political economy must be considered if assessments of the economic impact of institutional reform in any one sphere are to be accurate. The field of comparative political economy has been interested for many years in understanding how differences in the organization of national political economies con- dition aggregate economic performance. Behind such inquiries lies the intuition that more than one economic model can deliver economic success. But what are the central features that distinguish the operation of one political economy from another, and how should countries be categorized along these dimensions of difference? For the developed economies, the answers usually given to these questions in each era have corresponded to the principal challenges confronting those economies.