Hydrodynamic Modelling of the Port Curtis Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrodynamic Modelling of the Port Curtis Region Technical Report 7 Hydrodynamic Modelling of the Port Curtis Region Project CM2.11 M. Herzfeld, J. Parslow, J. Andrewartha, P. Sakov and I. T. Webster. April 2004 1 Hydrodynamic Modelling of the Port Curtis Region CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management Technical Report 7 M. Herzfeld, J. Parslow, J. Andrewartha, P. Sakov and I. T. Webster. April 2004 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Hydrodynamic Modelling of the Port Curtis Region ISBN 0 9578678 8 3 (print) This report may be copied and distributed for research and educational purposes with proper acknowledgement. Further information should be addressed to: CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management 80 Meiers Rd Indooroopilly Queensland 4068 Tel: 61 7 3362 9399 Fax: 61 7 3362 9372 Disclaimer: This report describes the pilot implementation of the MECO hydrodynamic model to Port Curtis. Although tidal height data have been used to calibrate water levels, the model has not been validated against measurements that could be used to assess its reliability for predicting currents and mixing within the harbour. Accordingly, the Coastal CRC and CSIRO cannot guarantee the accuracy of the model predictions, and does not recommend or endorse their use in applications where accuracy is critical Table of Contents Summary ____________________________________________________ 1 1. Background. ____________________________________________ 2 2. Objectives. ______________________________________________ 3 3. The Hydrodynamic Model. _________________________________ 4 4. Model Domain.___________________________________________ 6 5. Input Data. ______________________________________________ 9 5.1 Wind Forcing. _______________________________________________ 9 5.2 Surface Elevation.___________________________________________ 11 5.3 Temperature and Salinity. ____________________________________ 14 5.4 River Flow._________________________________________________ 15 6. Model Output. __________________________________________ 17 6.2 General Solutions ___________________________________________ 17 6.2 Residual Currents ___________________________________________ 24 6.3 Flushing Characteristics _____________________________________ 27 6.4 Transport Characteristics ____________________________________ 31 6.5 Connectivity _______________________________________________ 38 7. Benefits and Outcomes __________________________________ 44 8. Further Development ____________________________________ 44 9. Conclusions____________________________________________ 46 10. References _____________________________________________ 47 Summary A computer ocean model was developed for the Port Curtis Estuary to examine the oceanographic characteristics of the region. The model highly resolved the region of interest and predicted sea level, currents and distributions of dissolved material in the water in response to the effects of wind, tides, slow sea level changes and density effects. Such a model could be used to predict the movements and mixing of contaminants throughout the harbour, knowledge that could be used to support management. The time period investigated was the first four weeks of 1999. Results from the model show that the currents in the estuary are predominantly due to the effects of the tide, with the change in water level between high and low tide being as large as 4m. These large tides can generate very large currents, with some current speeds reaching up to 2ms-1 in the vicinity of North Channel. The tidal range is not constant but varies over an approximate 14-day period, with the smallest tidal range during this period being approximately half the largest range. The large tides also mix the water vertically so that any dissolved material (e.g. salt, temperature, contaminants) shows little variation from the surface to the bottom. A particle in the estuary undergoes large displacement due to the tidal motion which may be as great as 15km. However, tidal displacements are of a back-and-forth nature, and after a large displacement on one phase of the tide the particle returns to basically its original position on the next. This results in little net displacement of particles over multiple tidal cycles. This displacement is directed up-estuary in the lower estuary and is evident as a series of small eddies in the upper estuary. The net displacement is mainly due to the interaction of the tides with the bottom. In the offshore regions outside the estuary the residual circulation is mainly due to the wind and is directed along-shore towards the north-west. Net flow enters the estuary through Gatcombe Channel and exits through North Channel. The net flow characteristics may vary if the climatic conditions under which the model was run change. The flow regime within Port Curtis estuary allows dissolved material to be dispersed evenly throughout the estuary (i.e. the estuary is well connected), however material has difficulty leaving the estuary into the offshore environment. The e-folding flushing time (i.e. the time for total mass of material to decrease to ~1/3 of its original mass) for the estuary is of the order of 19 days in January 1999. This estimate applies to the estuary as a whole, and smaller sub- regions in the estuary have much shorter flushing times due to the well connected nature of the estuary. The flushing time for Rodds Bay is also much shorter as a result of good offshore exchange, having an e-folding time of 5 days in January 1999. If material is input into Port Curtis estuary as an external source and subsequently dissolves, then appreciable concentrations of the material occur within the estuary and negligible concentrations are found seaward of Facing Island. Material input into Rodds Bay results in far smaller concentrations, with largest concentrations restricted to the areas south of the input location. Release at the dredging spoil site results in distributions of dissolved material in the form of a plume originating from the source and directed north-westwards along the seaward coast of Facing Island. The prevailing wind conditions are likely to influence offshore distributions, hence the distribution is expected to vary during the year. The main output of the project is the development of the hydrodynamic model. With appropriate forcing data this model may be applied to any future, present or past time period. The simulations generated by the model and associated analyses provide a first order picture of the flow and distribution characteristics of the Port Curtis environment which may aid in management decision processes and generally provides enhanced understanding of the oceanography of the region. Once fully implemented, the model has the capacity to predict the outcomes of scenarios which may aid in management strategy evaluation. The model is currently at a pilot stage and requires further calibration and validation in order to achieve full confidence in solutions. The model should also be run under an expanded range of climatic conditions to better characterize variability in the region. 1 1. Background. The Port Curtis region (Figure 1.1) is situated at the transition between the tropics and sub- tropics in Central Queensland on the eastern coast of Australia. Port Curtis is a naturally protected deep water harbour that is the largest port in Queensland and the second largest on the eastern Australian coast in terms of tonnage handled. The surrounding land has become industrialized in the past 30 years and is now home to major industrial activity. Gladstone is the major urban center in Port Curtis with a population of 27,000 and is associated with four major industries; aluminium, cement production, chemical production and electricity generation. All these industries discharge waste material into the harbour or atmosphere (under licence). The bathymetry in the harbour has also been modified by the development of shipping channels, land reclamation and coastline armoring. Dredging of the shipping channel occurs regularly, with the spoils deposited at a location approximately 9km south east from Facing Island. Heavy metal concentrations in the sediments of the estuary (e.g. Cr, As, Ni) are a concern. The residents of the region also use the waters in the Port Curtis area for recreational purposes, including fishing, sailing and access to the nearby southern reaches of the Great Barrier Reef. There exists a collective awareness in the community about managing the region’s aquatic environment in a sustainable manner. Port Curtis is a macro tidal estuary with large barotropic tides having ranges up to 4m. The tide propagates into the estuary through the straits separating Facing Island from the mainland (Gatcombe Channel) and Curtis Island (North Channel) in the south-west, and through the Narrows in the north. Tides undergo a neap-spring cycle with a period of approximately 14 days, with ranges at the spring of ~4m and about 1m during the neap. Maximum currents during the spring phase may be as large as 2ms-1 in North Channel (Witt and Morgan, 1999). Fresh water flows may originate from the Narrows as a result of the nearby Fitzroy River flooding and the Calliope River which discharges into the estuary through Gladstone. The large tides ensure that the water column is vertically well mixed most of the time, and are also responsible for significant resuspension of fine sediment. Combined with very large deposits of silt from the hinterland in times of flood, the estuary maintains a highly turbid character. The region
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Officer
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by GBRMPA eLibrary Sunfish Queensland Inc Freshwater Wetlands and Fish Importance of Freshwater Wetlands to Marine Fisheries Resources in the Great Barrier Reef Vern Veitch Bill Sawynok Report No: SQ200401 Freshwater Wetlands and Fish 1 Freshwater Wetlands and Fish Importance of Freshwater Wetlands to Marine Fisheries Resources in the Great Barrier Reef Vern Veitch1 and Bill Sawynok2 Sunfish Queensland Inc 1 Sunfish Queensland Inc 4 Stagpole Street West End Qld 4810 2 Infofish Services PO Box 9793 Frenchville Qld 4701 Published JANUARY 2005 Cover photographs: Two views of the same Gavial Creek lagoon at Rockhampton showing the extreme natural variability in wetlands depending on the weather. Information in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. Sunfish Queensland Inc has taken all steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make the appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on a particular subject matter. Report No: SQ200401 ISBN 1 876945 42 7 ¤ Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Sunfish Queensland All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Freshwater Wetlands and Fish 2 Table of Contents 1. Acronyms Used in the Report .......................................................................8 2. Definition of Terms Used in the Report.........................................................9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnett Mary WQIP Ecologically Relevant Targets
    Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis 1 Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Prepared by Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone : (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ 2 Information should be cited as: Brodie J., Lewis S. (2014) Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef. TropWATER Report No. 14/32, Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, 41 pp. For further information contact: Catchment to Reef Research Group/Jon Brodie and Steven Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University ATSIP Building Townsville, QLD 4811 [email protected] © James Cook University, 2014. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of TropWATER. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Specific Ecologically Relevant Water Quality Targets for the Great Barrier Reef
    Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Jon Brodie, Mark Baird, Jane Waterhouse, Mathieu Mongin, Jenny Skerratt, Cedric Robillot, Rachael Smith, Reinier Mann and Michael Warne TropWATER Report number 17/38 June 2017 Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Report prepared by Jon Brodie1, Mark Baird2, Jane Waterhouse1, Mathieu Mongin2, Jenny Skerratt2, Cedric Robillot3, Rachael Smith4, Reinier Mann4 and Michael Warne4,5 2017 1James Cook University, 2CSIRO, 3eReefs, 4Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, 5Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom EHP16055 – Update and add to the existing 2013 Scientific Consensus Statement to incorporate the most recent science and to support the 2017 update of the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Input and review of the development of the targets provided by John Bennett, Catherine Collier, Peter Doherty, Miles Furnas, Carol Honchin, Frederieke Kroon, Roger Shaw, Carl Mitchell and Nyssa Henry throughout the project. Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone: (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ Citation: Brodie, J., Baird, M., Waterhouse, J., Mongin, M., Skerratt, J., Robillot, C., Smith, R., Mann, R., Warne, M., 2017. Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier
    [Show full text]
  • Section 18 Reference List
    GLNG PROJECT - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Section 18 Reference List 18 Reference List J:\Jobs\42626220\07 Deliverables\EIS\FINAL for Public Release\18. References\18 References (Section 18) FINAL PUBLIC.doc GLNG Project - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 18.1 EIS Section References 18.1.1 Introduction Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics (ABARE) 2008, Energy in Australia 2008, Canberra. International Energy Agency (IEA) 2008, World Energy Outlook 2008, ISBN 978-92-64-04560-6. 18.1.2 Project Alternatives Australian Pipeline Industry Association (APIA) 2005, Code of Environmental Practice – Onshore Pipelines. Connell Wagner Pty Ltd, 2008, Curtis Access Road, Bridge Planning Report, Curtis Island Common User Infrastructure, The Coordinator General, Reference 36914-001-05. Commonwealth of Australia, 2002, National Ocean Disposal Guidelines for Dredged Material, Canberra. Coordinator-General, 2008, Development Scheme for the Gladstone State Development Area, July 2008. McDaniels and Associates Consultants Ltd, 2006. Outokumpu Technology Australasia Pty Ltd, 2009, viewed 2009, http://www.outotec.com/default_6764.aspx?epslanguage=EN. Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, 2008, Coal Seam Gas Exploration, viewed 2009, http://www.dme.qld.gov.au/mines/production_1.cfm. Queensland Government Department of Mines and Energy (DME), 2008, Queensland Coal Seam Gas, viewed September 2008, http://www.dme.qld.gov.au/zone_files/Petroleum_and_Gas_PDFs/dme_csg_factsheet_jul_08_v_10.pdf. 18.1.3 Project Description Australian Standards (AS) 2885, 1997, Pipelines - Gas and Liquid Petroleum, Standards Australia 1997. Australian Standards (AS) 2885, 2005, Pipelines – Gas and Liquid Petroleum and the Australian Pipeline Industry Association Code of Environmental Practice. Australian Pipeline Industry Association (APIA), 2005, Code of Environmental Practice, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Queensland Regiondepartment of Transport and Main Roads
    Department of Transport and Main Roads Central Queensland central queensland regionDepartment of Transport and Main Roads Corfield ROCKHAMPTON Winton REGIONAL Muttaburra COUNCIL BOULIA WINTON BARCALDINE Marlborough Boulia SHIRE SHIRE REGIONAL Aramac COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL Capella ROCKHAMPTON Longreach Barcaldine EMERALD LONGREACH GLADSTONE REGIONAL Jericho Alpha Duaringa COUNCIL Springsure Woorabinda Bedourie Isisford Stonehenge Blackall Rolleston Banana DIAMANTINA SHIRE Emmet BARCOO COUNCIL BLACKALL - Tambo SHIRE Theodore GLADSTONE TAMBO COUNCIL CENTRAL REGIONAL REGIONAL COUNCIL COUNCIL HIGHLANDS Windorah REGIONAL COUNCIL Taroom Birdsville BANANA SHIRE COUNCIL Legend National road network State strategic road network State regional and other district road ³ National rail network 0 150 Km Other railway Local government boundary \\imapsfile\jobs\jobs\CORPORATE PRODUCTS\Annual Report and RIP Maps\RIP Maps\2013\Region RIP Maps\Central Qld\Central Queensland Region QTRIP_2013.mxd April 2013 Central Queensland Regional contacts Region Office Street address Postal address Telephone Email Central Queensland Rockhampton 31 Knight Street, North Rockhampton Qld 4701 PO Box 5096, Red Hill, Rockhampton Qld 4701 (07) 4931 1500 [email protected] Emerald 83 Esmond Street, Emerald Qld 4720 PO Box 1787, Emerald Qld 4720 (07) 4982 8700 [email protected] Barcaldine 69 Ash Street, Barcaldine Qld 4725 PO Box 3, Barcaldine 4725 (07) 4651 2777 [email protected] Divider image: Culvert extension works on
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report
    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Background Briefing on Environmental Protection and Development
    Background Briefing on Environmental Protection and Development Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area Prepared by the Queensland LNG Industry | May 2013 Contents Purpose 1 Context 2 Key Themes 3 General 3 1. LNG Safety 3 2. Economic Contribution 3 3. Environmental Management 4 4. Environmental Protection and Development 4 5. Gladstone Harbour Historical Context 4 6. Australia’s Exemplary Record on World Heritage 5 7. Fair Treatment of Australia 5 LNG Safety 6 Economic Contribution 8 Environmental Management 9 Environmental Protection and Development 10 Gladstone Harbour Historical Context 11 Australia’s Exemplary Record on World Heritage 12 Fair Treatment of Australia 13 Questions and Answers 15 Contacts BC 142°E 144°E 146°E 148°E 150°E 152°E 154°E S ° 0 1 TORRES STRAIT Ashmore Reef Thursday Island Ja rd in e R iver Jardine River NP River unty lh S u S ° D Cape Grenville ° 2 er 2 1 Riv 1 Olive W enloc k R iv e r Iron Range NP L o ck h a C O R A L S E A r t R i ve r Mungkan Archer Rive Kandju r Great Barrier Reef NP Marine Park KULLA (excludes harbours and islands) (McIlwraith Range) Osprey Reef S er S ° v NPA ° Ri Flinders Group 4 l 4 al 1 Ken d NP 1 r d Rive Holro y Ann r ie R e iver Cape iv R Melville E in dw k ard u r NP R ive r L e iv Cole ma n River R ad he re Lakefield Jack River o Starcke M NP NP NP r Mitchell- e iv COOKTOWN Alice Rivers R a % r C A P E Y O R K u NP a L e Cedar Bay P E N II N S U L A tl it L NP iver r R Palmer Goldfield S me S ° P al RSR ° 6 Daintree 6 1 NP 1 Cape Tribulation Holmes Reef r Mount Windsor ive ll
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Scientific Consensus Statement Chapter 2
    1 Citation: Bartley, R., Waters, D., Turner, R., Kroon, F., Wilkinson, S., Garzon-Garcia, A., Kuhnert, P., Lewis, S., Smith, R., Bainbridge, Z., Olley, J., Brooks, A., Burton, J., Brodie, J., Waterhouse, J., 2017. Scientific Consensus Statement 2017: A synthesis of the science of land-based water quality impacts on the Great Barrier Reef, Chapter 2: Sources of sediment, nutrients, pesticides and other pollutants to the Great Barrier Reef. State of Queensland, 2017. © State of Queensland, 2017 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of this publication. For more information on this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. This document was prepared by a panel of scientists with expertise in Great Barrier Reef water quality. This document does not represent government policy. Scientific Consensus Statement 2017—Chapter 2 Contents Acronyms, units and definitions ...................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oreochromis Mossambicus and Tilapia Mariae Distribution Throughout Qld - As at November 2019 140°E 145°E 150°E 155°E
    Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae distribution throughout Qld - as at November 2019 140°E 145°E 150°E 155°E Gulf Catchments Outline Murray-Darling Basin Outline List of infected catchments in Qld: Oreochromis mossambicus: BAFFLE CREEK BARRON RIVER BLACK RIVER BRISBANE RIVER BRUNSWICK RIVER BURDEKIN RIVER S BURNETT RIVER S ° ° 5 BURRUM RIVER 5 1 1 CALLIOPE RIVER DON RIVER ENDEAVOUR RIVER FITZROY RIVER (QLD) HAUGHTON RIVER HERBERT RIVER Cairns KOLAN RIVER LOGAN-ALBERT RIVERS MAROOCHY RIVER MARY RIVER (QLD) NOOSA RIVER PINE RIVER PIONEER RIVER ROSS RIVER SOUTH COAST Townsville Tilapia mariae: MURRAY RIVER S S ° JOHNSTONE RIVER ° 0 0 2 2 Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae: BARRON RIVER Mackay WALSH RIVER MULGRAVE-RUSSELL RIVER TULLY RIVER Rockhampton Emerald Bundaberg S Tambo S ° ° 5 5 2 2 Roma Chinchilla Dalby Brisbane Toowoomba Warwick Moree S Brewarrina S ° ° 0 Bourke 0 3 Walgett 3 Armidale Broken Hill Dubbo Orange Sydney S S ° ° 5 5 3 Wagga Wagga 3 These datasets are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia Author: Department of License. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ Agriculture & Fisheries While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of these data, all data custodians and/or the Date: 29/10/2019 State of Queensland makes no representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability, ± completeness or suitability for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility and all Co-ord Sys: GCS GDA 1994 liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs to which you might incur as a result Datum: GDA 1994 0 220 440 of the data being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Nutrient Usage in Coastal Queensland River Catchments Adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
    RESEARCH PUBLICATION No. 40 Historical Nutrient Usage in Coastal Queensland River Catchments Adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park J. S. Pulsford March 1993 A REPORT TO THE GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AUTHORITY © Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 1996 ISSN 1037-1508 ISBN 0 642 23011 0 Published July 1996 by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority The opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. National library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Pulsford, j. S. (jim 5.). Historical nutrient usage in coastal Queensland river catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Bibliography. ISBN 0 642 23011 O. 1. Water - Nitrogen content - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef. 2. Water - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef ­ Phosphorus content. 3. Fertilizers - Environmental aspects. I. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia). (Series: Research publication (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia)); no. 40). 333.916409943 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority PO Box 1379 Townsville Qld 4810 Telephone (077) 500 700 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. METHOD OF ALLOCATION OF NUTRIENTS TO BASINS 5 2.1 Queensland Data " 5 2.2 Statistical Divisions 5 2.3 Local Authority Areas 6 2.4 Using Australian Bureau of Statistics Data to Obtain Nutrient Usages 7 2.5 Fertilizer Indust,)' Data 8 2.6 Drainage Basins 9 2.7 Allocation of Nutrients to Basins 10 3. NUTRIENT USAGE IN SOME EASTERN QUEENSLAND BASINS 12 3. I Nitrogen Usage 12 3.2 PhosphoI1ls Usage 17 3.3 1990 Nitrogen and Phosphorus Usage Relative to Basin Areas 24 3.4 1990 Nitrogen and Phosphorus Usage Relative to Basin Run-off.
    [Show full text]
  • Calliope River Basin Water Management Protocol 20161
    Calliope River Basin Water Management Protocol December 2016 This publication has been compiled by Water Policy, Department of Natural Resources and Mines. © State of Queensland, 2016 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Contents Chapter 1 General ........................................................................................................................... 1 1 Short title ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Commencement of the water management protocol .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Network Capability and Performance
    6. Network capability and performance CHAPTER 6 Network capability and performance 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Available generation capacity 6.3 Network control facilities 6.4 Existing network configuration 6.5 Transfer capability 6.6 Grid section performance 6.7 Zone performance 6 Network capability and performance Key highlights yyDuring 2018/19, Powerlink has completed the connection of 11 large‑scale solar and wind farm projects, adding 1,423MW of semi‑scheduled variable renewable energy (VRE) generation capacity to the grid. yyGeneration commitments since the 2018 Transmission Annual Planning Report (TAPR) add 64MW to Queensland’s semi‑scheduled VRE generation capacity taking the total existing and committed VRE generation capacity to 2,457MW. yyThe Central Queensland to Southern Queensland (CQ‑SQ) grid section was highly utilised during 2018/19, reflecting higher generation levels in North Queensland (NQ) as a result of recently commissioned VRE generators. yyCommitted generation is expected to continue to alter power transfers, particularly during daylight hours, increasing the likelihood of congestion across the Gladstone, CQ‑SQ and Queensland/New South Wales (NSW) Interconnector (QNI) grid sections. yyRecord peak transmission delivered demands were recorded in the Far North, South West, Moreton and Gold Coast zones, during 2018/19. yyThe transmission network has performed reliably during 2018/19, with Queensland grid sections largely unconstrained. 6.1 Introduction This chapter on network capability and performance provides: yyan outline
    [Show full text]