DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2012.12476V2 [Math.DG] 31 Jan 2021 Where Iamncmp,Wihaecle Rprbhroi.Abiha a Biharmonic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2012.12476V2 [Math.DG] 31 Jan 2021 Where Iamncmp,Wihaecle Rprbhroi.Abiha a Biharmonic BIHARMONIC AND BICONSERVATIVE HYPERSURFACES IN SPACE FORMS DOREL FETCU AND CEZAR ONICIUC Abstract. We present some general properties of biharmonic and biconservative submanifolds and then survey recent results on such hypersurfaces in space forms. We also propose an alternative version of a well-known result of Nomizu and Smyth for hypersurfaces, by replacing the CMC hypothesis with the more general condition of biconservativity. 1. Introduction Suggested in 1964 by J. Eells and J. H. Sampson (see [25]) as a generalization of harmonic maps, the biharmonic maps represent nowadays a well-established and dynamic topic in Differential Geometry. A biharmonic map φ : M N between two Riemannian manifolds is a critical point of the bienergy functional→ 1 E : C∞(M, N) R, E (φ)= τ(φ) 2 dv, 2 → 2 2 | | ZM where M is compact and τ(φ) = trace dφ is the tension field of φ. These maps are characterized by the Euler-Lagrange∇ equation, also known as the biharmonic equation, obtained by G. Y. Jiang in 1986 (see [46]): (1.1) τ (φ)= ∆τ(φ) trace RN (dφ, τ(φ))dφ = 0, 2 − − where τ2(φ) is the bitension field of φ. Since any harmonic map is biharmonic, our interest is to study non-harmonic biharmonic maps, which are called proper biharmonic. A biharmonic submanifold of N is a biharmonic isometric immersion φ : M N. Sometimes, throughout this paper, we will identify a submanifold as M rather→ than mentioning the immersion arXiv:2012.12476v2 [math.DG] 31 Jan 2021 φ. In Euclidean spaces, B.-Y. Chen (see [16]) proposed an alternative definition of bi- harmonic submanifolds that coincides with the previous one when the ambient space is Rn. B.-Y. Chen also conjectured that there are no proper biharmonic submani- folds in Rn (see [16]). On the other hand, there are many examples and classification results in spaces of non-negative curvature, especially in the Euclidian sphere Sn. From the theory of biharmonic submanifolds a new interesting subject, the study of biconservative submanifolds, arose and keeps gaining ground in today’s mathemat- ical research as there are many interesting examples of biconservative submanifolds, even when the biharmonic ones fail to exist. We will present details on this rather new notion in the next sections of this survey. In this survey, we only discuss the hypersurfaces in space forms. We omit, for space reasons, other very interesting results on submanifolds in Minkowski spaces, 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 53C42, 53C24, 53C21. Key words and phrases. biharmonic hypersurfaces, biconservative hypersurfaces, parabolic sur- faces, real space forms. 1 2 DORELFETCUANDCEZARONICIUC product spaces, complex space forms, PNMC submanifolds, etc. (see, for example, [18], [30]-[32], [37], [38], [44], [45], [55], [60], [68], [74]-[78], [82]). For the same reason, not even in the case of hypersurfaces in space forms, we will not refer to their stability properties and index. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present definitions and general properties of biharmonic and biconservative submanifolds in Riemannian manifolds. The third section is devoted to biharmonic and biconservative surfaces in three di- mensional space forms, and it is divided accordingly into two subsections. Finally, Section 4, also consisting of two subsections, is concerned with biharmonic and bicon- servative hypersurfaces (with dimension greater than two) in space forms. We give a much simpler proof for Theorem 4.21, of J. H. Chen in [21], on compact proper biharmonic hypersurfaces and we prove a local version of this result, Proposition 4.22. This result can be also seen as a local version of the fact that A 2 = constant implies CMC for compact proper biharmonic hypersurfaces in spheres,| | with addi- tional hypotheses on the curvature. We also prove Theorem 4.30 which, together with Theorem 4.27, provides an alternative version of a result of K. Nomizu and B. Smyth on compact CMC hypersurfaces, by replacing the CMC hypothesis with the biconservative one, which is more general. Throughout this paper a special focus is on the case when the ambient space is a Euclidean sphere. We end by posing two open problems. Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank Bang-Yen Chen, Yu Fu, Matheus Vieira, Alvaro´ P´ampano, Hiba Bibi, and Simona Nistor for carefully reading the preliminary version of our paper and for their comments and suggestions. Conventions. We use the following definitions and sign conventions. Consider a smooth map φ : M N, between two Riemannian manifolds, where M is assumed to be oriented and connected.→ In general, we will not indicate explicitly the metrics on M or N. Then, ∆= trace( φ)2 = trace( φ φ φ ) − ∇ − ∇ ∇ −∇∇ is the rough Laplacian defined on the set of all sections in φ−1(TN), that is on C(φ−1(TN)), and RN is the curvature tensor field of N, given by RN (U, V )W = [ ¯ , ¯ ]W ¯ W. ∇U ∇V − ∇[U,V ] Here, φ denotes the pull-back connection on φ−1(TN), while and ¯ are the Levi-Civita∇ connections on T M and TN, respectively. Henceforth,∇ for the∇ sake of simplicity, we will denote all connections on various fiber bundles by , the difference being clear from the context. The n-dimensional Euclidian sphere∇ of radius r will be denoted by Sn(r) and, when r = 1, by Sn. 2. Definitions and general properties In this section we briefly recall basic and general results on biharmonic and bi- conservative submanifolds with a focus on surfaces and hypersurfaces. 2.1. Biconservative submanifolds. Consider a given map φ : M m (N n, h), → BIHARMONIC AND BICONSERVATIVE SURFACES 3 where the metric h is also fixed, and define a new functional on the set of all Riemannian metrics on M by G : R, (g)= E (φ). F2 G → F2 2 Critical points of this functional are characterized by the vanishing of the stress- energy tensor of the bienergy (see [49]). This tensor, denoted by S2, was introduced in [47] as 1 S (X,Y )= τ(φ) 2 X,Y + dφ, τ(φ) X,Y 2 2| | h i h ∇ ih i dφ(X), τ(φ) dφ(Y ), τ(φ) − h ∇Y i − h ∇X i and it satisfies div S = τ (φ), dφ . 2 −h 2 i ♯ ⊤ ⊤ We note that, for isometric immersions, (div S2) = τ2(φ) , where τ2(φ) is the tangent part of the bitension field. − Definition 2.1. A map φ : M N is called biconservative if div S = 0. → 2 Definition 2.2. A submanifold φ : M N is called biconservative if the isometric immersion φ is biconservative. → Remark 2.3. We have the following direct consequences. (1) Any biharmonic map is also biconservative. (2) If φ : M N is a submersion, not necessarily Riemannian, then φ is a biconservative→ map if and only if it is biharmonic. ⊤ (3) A submanifold M of N is biconservative if and only if τ2(φ) = 0. We have the following general properties of the stress-bienergy tensor of a sub- manifold. Proposition 2.4. For a submanifold φ : M m N n we have: → (i) the stress-bienergy tensor of φ is given by m2 S = H 2I + 2mA , 2 − 2 | | H where AH is the shape operator in the direction of H, the mean curvature vector field; (ii) trace S = m2 H 2 2 m ; 2 | | − 2 (iii) the relation between the divergence of S2 and the divergence of AH is given by m2 div S = grad H 2 + 2m div A ; 2 − 2 | | H (iv) S 2 = m4 H 4 m 2 + 4m2 A 2. | 2| | | 4 − | H | 2.2. Properties of biharmonic submanifolds. Next, we shall present some non- existence and unique-continuation properties of biharmonic maps, derived from a Weitzenb¨ock formula and the fact that these maps are characterized by an elliptic equation. Theorem 2.5 ([46]). Let φ : M N be a smooth map, where M is compact and → RiemN 0. Then φ is biharmonic if and only if it is harmonic. ≤ Given up to compactness, we can state the following proposition. 4 DORELFETCUANDCEZARONICIUC Proposition 2.6 ([69]). Let φ : M N be an isometric immersion such that → τ(φ) = constant and assume that RiemN 0. Then φ is biharmonic if and only if| it is| minimal. ≤ In the case of hypersurfaces the next results hold. Theorem 2.7 ([69]). Let φ : M N be a compact hypersurface and assume that → RicciN 0. Then M is biharmonic if and only if it is minimal. ≤ Proposition 2.8 ([69]). Let φ : M N be a hypersurface such that τ(φ) = → | | constant, where RicciN 0. Then φ is biharmonic if and only if it is minimal. ≤ The proofs of these non-existence results are based on a classical Weitzenb¨ock for- mula 1 ∆ σ 2 = ∆σ, σ σ 2, σ C(φ−1TN), 2 | | h i−|∇ | ∈ where one considers σ = τ(φ) and gets τ(φ) = 0. Then, using the equation ∇ τ(φ) 2 = trace , τ(φ) , | | − h· ∇· i which holds for isometric immersions, one obtains that τ(φ) vanishes. Proposition 2.9 ([69]). Let φ : M N be a smooth map such that τ(φ) = constant and assume that there exists→ a point p M where rank φ(p) | 2.| If ∈ ≥ RiemN < 0, then φ is biharmonic if and only if it is harmonic. Concerning the unique continuation property, we have the following results. Theorem 2.10 ([8],[11]). Let φ : M N be a biharmonic map. If φ is harmonic on an open subset, then it is harmonic→ everywhere. Theorem 2.11 ([8]). Let φ1, φ2 : M N be two biharmonic maps. If they agree on an open subset, then they are identical.→ Theorem 2.12 ([8]).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Differential Integral Equations 29
    Citations From References: 2 From Reviews: 0 MR3513585 45G10 35B38 35J30 35J75 35J91 58J05 Zhu, Meijun [Zhu, Meijun1] (1-OK) Prescribing integral curvature equation. (English summary) Differential Integral Equations 29 (2016), no. 9-10, 889{904. n Given any positive, continuous, and antipodally symmetric function R on S , it is proved bαc−n n in this paper that there exists a positive, antipodally symmetric solution u 2 C (S ) to the following integral equation: Z α−n n+α (1) u(ξ) = R(η)jξ − ηj u(η) n−α dση; n S where α > n. Here, jξ − ηj denotes the chordal distance between ξ and η in Rn+1 and n by antipodally symmetric functions f we mean those f satisfying f(η) = f(−η) on S . Clearly (1) can be thought of as an integral version of the differential equation α/2 −1 n+α (2) (−∆) v = (R ◦ π )v n−α n n n on R obtained via the stereographic projection π: S ! R . However, (1) and (2) are not equivalent in the case α > n [see Y. S. Choi and X. Xu, J. Differential Equations 246 (2009), no. 1, 216{234; MR2467021; I. A. Guerra, J. Differential Equations 253 (2012), no. 11, 3147{3157; MR2968196; Trinh Viet Duoc and Qu^oc-AnhNg^o,\A´ note on radial 2 −q 3 solutions of ∆ u + u = 0 in R with exactly quadratic growth at infinity", preprint, arXiv:1511.09171]. To obtain such an existence result for (1), the author seeks critical points of the energy functional ZZ Z n+α α−n 2n n Jα,R(f) = R(ξ)R(η)f(ξ)f(η)jξ − ηj dσξdση f(η) n+α R(η)dση n n n S ×S S n on S .
    [Show full text]
  • Biwave Maps Into Manifolds Yuan-Jen Chiang University of Mary Washington, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: 10.1155/2009/104274
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Eagle Scholar University of Mary Washington University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Mathematics College of Arts and Sciences 2009 Biwave Maps into Manifolds Yuan-Jen Chiang University of Mary Washington, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: 10.1155/2009/104274 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/mathematics Part of the Applied Mathematics Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Chiang, Yuan-Jen. “Biwave Maps into Manifolds.” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences (2009): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/104274. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 2009, Article ID 104274, 14 pages doi:10.1155/2009/104274 Research Article Biwave Maps into Manifolds Yuan-Jen Chiang Department of Mathematics, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA22401, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Yuan-Jen Chiang, [email protected] Received 8 January 2009; Accepted 30 March 2009 Recommended by Jie Xiao We generalize wave maps to biwave maps. We prove that the composition of a biwave map and a totally geodesic map is a biwave map. We give examples of biwave nonwave maps. We show that if f is a biwave map into a Riemannian manifold under certain circumstance, then f is a wave map.
    [Show full text]
  • F -BIHARMONIC SUBMANIFOLDS of GENERALIZED SPACE FORMS Julien Roth, Abhitosh Upadhyay
    f -BIHARMONIC SUBMANIFOLDS OF GENERALIZED SPACE FORMS Julien Roth, Abhitosh Upadhyay To cite this version: Julien Roth, Abhitosh Upadhyay. f -BIHARMONIC SUBMANIFOLDS OF GENERALIZED SPACE FORMS. Results in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, 2020, 75 (1), pp.article n˚20. hal-01459382v2 HAL Id: hal-01459382 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01459382v2 Submitted on 2 Mar 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. f-BIHARMONIC SUBMANIFOLDS OF GENERALIZED SPACE FORMS JULIEN ROTH AND ABHITOSH UPADHYAY Abstract. We study f-biharmonic submanifolds in both generalized complex and Sasakian space forms. We prove necessary and sufficient conditions for f-biharmonicity in the general case and many particular cases. Some geometric estimates as well as non-existence results are also obtained. 1. Introduction Harmonic maps between two Riemannian manifolds (M m; g) and (N n; h) are critical points of the energy functional Z 1 2 E( ) = jd j dvg; 2 M where is a map from M to N and dvg denotes the volume element of g. The Euler-Lagrange equation associated with E( ) is given by τ( ) = 0, where τ( ) = T racerd is the tension field of , which vanishes precisely for harmonic maps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characterization of Biharmonic Morphisms1
    Differential Geometry and Its Applications 31 Proc. Conf., Opava (Czech Republic), August 27–31, 2001 Silesian University, Opava, 2001, 31–41 The characterization of biharmonic morphisms1 E. Loubeau and Y.-L. Ou Abstract. We present a characterization of biharmonic morphisms, i.e., maps between Riemannian manifolds which preserve (local) biharmonic functions, in a manner similar to the case of harmonic morphisms for harmonic func- tions. Of particular interest are maps which are at the same time harmonic and biharmonic morphisms. Keywords. Biharmonic morphisms, harmonic morphisms, harmonic maps. MS classification. 58E20, 31B30. 1. Harmonic maps Consider two Riemannian manifolds (Mm, g) and (N n, h), and a C2-map φ : (M, g) →− (N, h) between them, then the energy of the map φ is: 1 2 E(φ) = |dφx | vg. 2 M (or over any compact subset K ⊂ M). A map is called harmonic if it is an extremum, in its homotopy class, of the energy functional E (or E(K ) for all compact subsets K ⊂ M). The Euler–Lagrange equation corresponding to this functional is the tension field, a system of semi-linear second-order elliptic partial differential equations: τ(φ) = trace ∇ dφ. 1 This paper is in final form and no version of it will be submitted for publication elsewhere. The second author was supported by NSF of Guangxi 0007015, and by the special Funding for Young Talents of Guangxi (1998-2000). 32 E. Loubeau and Y.-L. Ou In local coordinates, it takes the form: ∂2φα ∂φα ∂φβ ∂φγ α ij M k N α τ (φ) = g − + βγ , ∂xi ∂x j ij ∂xk ∂xi ∂x j M k N α where ij and βγ are the Christoffel symbols of the Levi-Civita connections on (M, g) and (N, h).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Properties of Biconservative Surfaces in $\Mathbb {R}^ 3$ and $\Mathbb {S}^ 3$
    GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF BICONSERVATIVE SURFACES 3 3 IN R AND S SIMONA NISTOR AND CEZAR ONICIUC Abstract. We survey some recent results on biconservative surfaces in 3-di- mensional space forms N 3(c) with a special emphasis on the c = 0 and c = 1 cases. We study the local and global properties of such surfaces, from extrinsic and intrinsic point of view. We obtain all non-CMC complete biconservative 3 3 surfaces in R and S . 1. Introduction The study of submanifolds with constant mean curvature, i.e., CMC submani- folds, and, in particular, that of CMC surfaces in 3-dimensional spaces, represents a very active research topic in Differential Geometry for more than 50 years. There are several ways to generalize these submanifolds. For example, keeping the CMC hypothesis and adding other geometric hypotheses to the submanifold or, by contrast, in the particular case of hypersurfaces in space forms, studying the hypersurfaces which are \highly non-CMC". The biconservative submanifolds seem to be an interesting generalization of CMC submanifolds. Biconservative submanifolds in arbitrary manifolds (and in particu- lar, biconservative surfaces) which are also CMC have some remarkable properties (see, for example [10, 18, 22, 28]). CMC hypersurfaces in space forms are triv- ially biconservative, so more interesting is the study of biconservative hypersurfaces which are non-CMC; recent results in non-CMC biconservative hypersurfaces were obtained in [12, 19, 21, 29, 30]. The biconservative submanifolds are closely related to the biharmonic submani- folds. More precisely, let us consider the bienergy functional defined for all smooth maps between two Riemannian manifolds (M m; g) and (N n; h) and given by Z 1 2 1 E2(') = jτ(')j vg;' 2 C (M; N); 2 M arXiv:1701.07706v3 [math.DG] 14 Apr 2017 where τ(') is the tension field of '.
    [Show full text]
  • Chen's Biharmonic Conjecture and Submanifolds with Parallel Normalized Mean Curvature Vector
    mathematics Article Chen’s Biharmonic Conjecture and Submanifolds with Parallel Normalized Mean Curvature Vector Bang-Yen Chen Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, 619 Red Cedar Road, East Lansing, MI 48824–1027, USA; [email protected] Received: 30 June 2019; Accepted: 1 August 2019; Published: 6 August 2019 Abstract: The well known Chen’s conjecture on biharmonic submanifolds in Euclidean spaces states that every biharmonic submanifold in a Euclidean space is a minimal one. For hypersurfaces, we know from Chen and Jiang that the conjecture is true for biharmonic surfaces in E3. Also, Hasanis and Vlachos proved that biharmonic hypersurfaces in E4; and Dimitric proved that biharmonic hypersurfaces in Em with at most two distinct principal curvatures. Chen and Munteanu showed that the conjecture is true for d(2)-ideal and d(3)-ideal hypersurfaces in Em. Further, Fu proved that the conjecture is true for hypersurfaces with three distinct principal curvatures in Em with arbitrary m. In this article, we provide another solution to the conjecture, namely, we prove that biharmonic surfaces do not exist in any Euclidean space with parallel normalized mean curvature vectors. Keywords: biharmonic submanifold; B.-Y. Chen’s conjecture; d-invariant; submanifolds with parallel normalized mean curvature vector MSC: 53C40; 53D12; 53D40 1. Introduction Let M be a Riemannian submanifold of a Euclidean m-space Em. Denote by D the Laplacian of M. Then, M is called biharmonic if its position vector field x satisfies (cf. [1]) D2x = 0. (1) Clearly, minimal submanifolds of Em are biharmonic. The study of biharmonic submanifolds was initiated around the middle of 1980s in the author’s program of understanding finite type submanifolds in Euclidean spaces, also independently by Jiang in [2] in his study of Euler–Lagrange’s equation of bienergy functional.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Note di Matematica ISSN 1123-2536, e-ISSN 1590-0932 Note Mat. 39 (2019) no. 2, 95{109. doi:10.1285/i15900932v39n2p95 Biharmonic Hermitian vector bundles over compact K¨ahlermanifolds and compact Einstein Riemannian manifolds Hajime Urakawa Division of Mathematics, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3-09, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan [email protected] Received: 1.7.2019; accepted: 18.11.2019. Abstract. We show, for every Hermitian vector bundle π :(E; g) ! (M; h) over a compact K¨ahlerEinstein manifold (M; h), if the projection π is biharmonic, then it is harmonic. On a biharmonic Hermitian vector bundle over a compact Riemannian manifold with positive Ricci curvature, we show a new estimate of the first eigenvalue of the Laplacian. Keywords: biharmonic maps, harmonic maps, K¨ahlerEinstein manifolds, Hermitian vector bundles MSC 2000 classification: primary 53C43; secondary 58E20, 53C07 Introduction Research of harmonic maps, which are critical points of the energy func- tional, is one of the central problems in differential geometry including minimal submanifolds. The Euler-Lagrange equation is given by the vanishing of the tension field. In 1983, Eells and Lemaire ([8]) proposed to study biharmonic maps, which are critical points of the bienergy functional, by definition, half of the integral of square of the norm of tension field τ(') for a smooth map ' of a Riemannian manifold (M; g) into another Riemannian manifold (N; h). After a work by G.Y. Jiang [21], several geometers have studied biharmonic maps (see [4], [12], [13], [20], [24], [26], [38], [39], etc.). Note that a harmonic maps is always biharmonic.
    [Show full text]
  • HARMONIC and BIHARMONIC MAPS at IASI Nowadays, the Theory of Harmonic Maps Between Riemannian Manifolds Is a Very Important Fiel
    ANALELE S¸TIINT¸IFICE ALE UNIVERSITAT¸II˘ \AL.I. CUZA" DIN IAS¸I (S.N.) MATEMATICA,˘ Tomul LVI, 2010, f.1 DOI: 10.2478/v10157-010-0006-8 HARMONIC AND BIHARMONIC MAPS AT IAS¸I BY A. BALMUS¸, D. FETCU and C. ONICIUC* Dedicated to the centennial anniversary since the foundation of the \A. Myller" Mathematical Seminar Abstract. We report on the achievements of the geometers from Ia¸siin the field of harmonic and biharmonic maps. Mathematics Subject Classification 2000: 53C07, 53C40, 53C42, 53C43, 58E20. Key words: harmonic and biharmonic maps, minimal and biharmonic submanifolds. Nowadays, the theory of harmonic maps between Riemannian manifolds is a very important field of Riemannian geometry. The harmonic maps ϕ :(M; g) ! (N; h) are critical points of the energy functional E which is defined on the infinit dimensional manifold of the smooth maps from M to N, Z 1 1 2 E : C (M; N) ! R;E(ϕ) = kdϕk vg: 2 M Here dϕ is the differential of the map ϕ and k·k denotes the Hilbert-Schmidt norm. The Euler-Lagrange equation associated to the energy E is given by the vanishing of the tension field τ(ϕ) = trace rdϕ and it is a second order elliptic equation, as one can see from its local expression @ϕβ @ϕσ −∆ϕα + N Γα gij = 0; βσ @xi @xj where Γ denotes the Christoffel symbols and ∆ is the Laplacian acting on functions. From here raises the deep link established by the harmonic maps *The third author was supported by PCE Grant PN II-2228 (502/2009), Romania 82 A.
    [Show full text]
  • [Math.DG] 28 Oct 2005 Saciia on Fthe of Point Critical a Is Nryin Energy ( Eso Edo Ftema Uvtr Etrfil,Rsetvl.M Respectively
    A SHORT SURVEY ON BIHARMONIC MAPS BETWEEN RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS S. MONTALDO AND C. ONICIUC 1. Introduction Let C∞(M, N) be the space of smooth maps φ : (M,g) (N, h) between two → Riemannian manifolds. A map φ C∞(M, N) is called harmonic if it is a critical point of the energy functional ∈ 1 2 E : C∞(M, N) R, E(φ)= dφ vg, → 2 ZM | | and is characterized by the vanishing of the first tension field τ(φ) = trace dφ. In the same vein, if we denote by Imm(M, N) the space of Riemannian immersions∇ in (N, h), then a Riemannian immersion φ : (M,φ∗h) (N, h) is called minimal if it is a critical point of the volume functional → R 1 V : Imm(M, N) , V (φ)= vφ∗h, → 2 ZM and the corresponding Euler-Lagrange equation is H = 0, where H is the mean curvature vector field. If φ :(M,g) (N, h) is a Riemannian immersion, then it is a critical point of the → energy in C∞(M, N) if and only if it is a minimal immersion [24]. Thus, in order to study minimal immersions one can look at harmonic Riemannian immersions. A natural generalization of harmonic maps and minimal immersions can be given by considering the functionals obtained integrating the square of the norm of the tension field or of the mean curvature vector field, respectively. More precisely: biharmonic maps are the critical points of the bienergy functional • arXiv:math/0510636v1 [math.DG] 28 Oct 2005 1 2 E2 : C∞(M, N) R, E2(φ)= τ(φ) vg ; → 2 ZM | | Willmore immersions are the critical points of the Willmore functional • 2 R 2 W : Imm(M , N) , W (φ)= H + K vφ∗h , → Z 2 | | M where K is the sectional curvature of (N, h) restricted to the image of M 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1712.03870V2 [Math.DG]
    A LIOUVILLE-TYPE THEOREM FOR BIHARMONIC MAPS BETWEEN COMPLETE RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS WITH SMALL ENERGIES VOLKER BRANDING Abstract. We prove a Liouville-type theorem for biharmonic maps from a complete Rie- mannian manifold of dimension n that has a lower bound on its Ricci curvature and positive injectivity radius into a Riemannian manifold whose sectional curvature is bounded from above. Under these geometric assumptions we show that if the Lp-norm of the tension field is bounded and the n-energy of the map is sufficiently small then every biharmonic map must be harmonic, where 2 <p<n. 1. Introduction and Results Harmonic maps belong to the most studied variational problems in differential geometry. They are defined as critical points of the Dirichlet energy 2 E1(φ)= |dφ| dV, (1.1) ZM where φ: M → N is a map between the two Riemannian manifolds (M, h) and (N, g). The critical points of (1.1) are characterized by the vanishing of the so-called tension field, which is given by 0= τ(φ) := trh∇dφ. This is a semilinear, elliptic second order partial differential equation, for which many results on existence and qualitative behavior of its solutions have been obtained. For a recent survey on harmonic maps see [4]. A natural generalization of the harmonic map equation are the so-called biharmonic maps. These arise as critical points of the bienergy [6], which is defined as 2 E2(φ)= |τ(φ)| dV. ZM In contrast to the harmonic map equation, the biharmonic map equation is of fourth order and is characterized by the vanishing of the bitension field N 0= τ2(φ) := −∆τ(φ)+ R (dφ(eα),τ(φ))dφ(eα), (1.2) N where eα is an orthonormal basis of T M and R denotes the curvature tensor of the target manifold N.
    [Show full text]
  • Biharmonic Submanifolds in Space Forms
    Symposium Valenciennes 25 Biharmonic submanifolds in space forms ADINA BALMUS¸, STEFANO MONTALDO AND CEZAR ONICIUC ∗ Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita` di Cagliari [email protected], [email protected] Faculty of Mathematics, “Al.I. Cuza” University of Iasi [email protected] Abstract In this paper we outline some recent results concerning the classification of biharmonic submanifolds in a space form. Keywords : harmonic maps, biharmonic maps, minimal submanifolds, biharmonic submanifolds 1 Introduction In [10], even if they took the main interest in harmonic maps, Eells and Sampson also envisaged some generalizations and defined biharmonic maps ϕ : (M,g) → (N,h) between Riemannian manifolds as critical points of the bienergy functional Z 1 2 E2(ϕ) = |τ(ϕ)| vg, 2 M where τ(ϕ) = trace∇dϕ is the tension field of ϕ that vanishes on harmonic maps. The Euler- Lagrange equation corresponding to E2 is given by the vanishing of the bitension field ϕ N τ2(ϕ) = −J (τ(ϕ)) = −∆τ(ϕ) − trace R (dϕ,τ(ϕ))dϕ, where Jϕ is formally the Jacobi operator of ϕ. The operator Jϕ is linear, thus any harmonic map is biharmonic. We call proper biharmonic the non-harmonic biharmonic maps. Although E2 has been on the mathematical scene since the early ’60 (when some of its an- alytical aspects have been discussed) and regularity of its critical points is nowadays a well- developed field, a systematic study of the geometry of biharmonic maps has started only re- cently. In this paper we shall focus our attention on biharmonic submanifolds, i.e. on submanifolds such that the inclusion map is a biharmonic map.
    [Show full text]
  • Biharmonic Maps on V-Manifolds
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Mathematics College of Arts and Sciences 2001 Biharmonic Maps on V-Manifolds Yuan-Jen Chiang Hongan Sun Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/mathematics Part of the Applied Mathematics Commons, and the Harmonic Analysis and Representation Commons IJMMS 27:8 (2001) 477–484 PII. S0161171201006731 http://ijmms.hindawi.com © Hindawi Publishing Corp. BIHARMONIC MAPS ON V-MANIFOLDS YUAN-JEN CHIANG and HONGAN SUN (Received 16 February 2001) Abstract. We generalize biharmonic maps between Riemannian manifolds into the case of the domain being V-manifolds. We obtain the first and second variations of bihar- monic maps on V-manifolds. Since a biharmonic map from a compact V-manifold into a Riemannian manifold of nonpositive curvature is harmonic, we construct a biharmonic non-harmonic map into a sphere. We also show that under certain condition the biharmonic property of f implies the harmonic property of f . We finally discuss the composition of biharmonic maps on V-manifolds. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 58E20, 35K05. 1. Introduction. Following Eells, Sampson, and Lemaire’s tentative ideas [7, 8, 9], Jiang first discussed biharmonic (or 2-harmonic) maps between Riemannian manifolds in his two articles [10, 11] in China in 1986, which gives the conditions for biharmonic maps. A biharmonic map f : M → N between Riemannian manifolds is the smooth critical point of the bi-energy functional ∗ 2 2 E2(f ) = d+d f ∗1 = τ(f) ∗1, (1.1) M M ∗ = ˆ = ˆ where 1 is the volume form on M, the tension field τ(f) (Ddf)(ei,ei)( (Dei df )(ei)), {ei} is the local frame of a point p in M.
    [Show full text]