Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ATTRACTING, DEVELOPING AND RETAINING EFFECTIVE TEACHERS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND OECD COUNTRY BACKGROUND REPORT Alistair ROSS and Merryn HUTCHINGS Institute for Policy Studies in Education London Metropolitan University MARCH 2003 CBR/UK(2003) NOTE This Country Background Report (CBR) for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been prepared as part of the OECD Activity on Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Country Background Reports are being prepared by all twenty-three countries participating in the project, to be used in the common Analytic Review. A Thematic Country Review will take place in a smaller group of nine countries, not including the UK. This report was prepared for the Department for Education and Skills, England, together with the Department of Education, Northern Ireland; the Scottish Executive Education Department; and the Department of Education and Training, Wales. The document was prepared in response to guidelines the OECD provided to all participating countries. The guidelines encouraged the authors to canvass a breadth of views and priorities on teacher policy issues. The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the national authority, the OECD or its Member countries. The CBR is intended for three main audiences: the Secretariat and other countries participating in the Activity; those interested in teacher policy within the United Kingdom; and those interested in teacher policy at international level. The Department for Education and Skills, England, has acted as the lead National Agency for the UK in commissioning this report and in helping to provide evidence and data on which it has been based. The authors gratefully acknowledge the help that has been given by many colleagues in the Department, together with those in the Scottish Executive Education Department; the Department of Education and Training, Wales; and the Department of Education, Northern Ireland. We are also grateful for the views and information submitted by a wide range of stakeholders in the educational system and included in summary in various places in this report. The stakeholders that contributed are listed in Appendix 1. The report has been prepared by Professor Alistair Ross and Dr Merryn Hutchings, of the Institute for Policy Studies in Education, London Metropolitan University. March 2003 i CBR/UK(2003) TABLE OF CONTENTS paragraph page LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii INTRODUCTION 1 Teacher recruitment and retention in the United Kingdom §1 1 Current educational reforms in the United Kingdom §3 1 Scope of this report §14 3 ONE: THE UNITED KINGDOM NATIONAL CONTEXT 4 1.1 Introduction §16 4 1.2 The administration of education in the UK §17 4 Key policy priorities and developments in education §25 6 England §26 6 Wales §36 8 Northern Ireland §40 9 Scotland §43 9 1.3 Broad population trends §47 10 Minority ethnic group population trends §53 11 1.4 Economic and labour market trends and their implications for schools and teaching §57 12 1.5 Public and private resources available for schooling §62 12 1.6 Public perceptions of schools and teachers §69 14 TWO: THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AND THE TEACHING WORKFORCE 16 2.1 Introduction §75 16 2.2 The main structural features of the school system §76 16 Types of schools §78 16 Sectors and types of state maintained schools §80 17 State maintained schools in England and Wales §83 17 Initiatives in England: Specialist schools, Excellence in Cities and Beacon §87 18 Schools State maintained schools in Scotland §95 19 Grant-aided schools in Northern Ireland §97 19 Private schools §98 20 Governance of schools §103 20 Types of school curriculum and programme §112 21 2.3 Teachers in employment §121 23 Unqualified teachers §127 25 2.4 Personnel other than teachers §130 25 2.5 Organisations involved in the development of policies concerning teachers §137 27 ii CBR/UK(2003) THREE: ATTRACTING ABLE PEOPLE INTO THE TEACHING PROFESSION 30 3.1 Identification of the main policy concerns §147 30 3.2 Data, trends and factors §149 30 Methods used to determine teacher shortages, and areas of shortage §149 30 Inflow of teachers into the maintained sector §164 35 The main pathways by which people can become teachers §165 35 Trends in teacher training numbers §166 36 The extent to which those entering training go on to become teachers §173 37 Reasons why people enter teaching §177 39 Initiatives taken to attract more people into teaching §179 39 Teachers’ salaries in comparison to those of other graduate professions §193 42 Those returning to teaching after a career break §201 43 The recruitment of overseas teachers §203 43 3.3 Future policy developments §209 44 FOUR: EDUCATING, DEVELOPING AND CERTIFYING TEACHERS 46 4.1 Identification of the main policy concerns §214 46 4.2 Data, trends and factors §216 46 Requirements to qualify for employment as a teacher §216 46 England §218 46 Wales §225 47 Scotland §226 47 Northern Ireland §229 48 Initial teacher education §231 48 England §231 48 Wales §252 51 Scotland §254 51 Northern Ireland §258 52 Stakeholder concerns about initial teacher education §260 52 Provision for those changing careers or re-entering teaching after a break §263 52 England and Wales §263 52 Scotland and Northern Ireland §267 53 Induction and early professional development arrangements §268 53 England §269 53 Wales §275 54 Scotland §276 54 Northern Ireland §279 55 Continuing professional development for teachers §283 55 England §288 56 Wales §298 58 Scotland §300 58 Northern Ireland §303 59 4.3 Future policy developments §304 59 FIVE: TEACHER CAREERS: RECRUITMENT, EMPLOYMENT AND SALARY 60 STRUCTURES 5.1 Introduction §307 60 5.2 Data, trends and factors §308 60 Responsibility for employment and deployment of teaching staff §309 60 The recruitment and selection of teachers §312 61 iii CBR/UK(2003) The appointment process §312 61 Requirements for appointment §320 62 Particular arrangements for first appointments §327 63 Supply agencies and the recruitment of supply teachers §332 63 Promotion and career patterns §338 64 England §339 65 Scotland §347 67 Wales §349 68 Northern Ireland §350 68 Salary structures §355 69 England and Wales §356 69 Northern Ireland §361 70 Scotland §362 71 Movement of teachers between posts, schools and different areas §366 72 Terms and conditions of teachers’ employment §371 72 Arrangements for teacher evaluation §382 74 England §382 74 Wales §385 74 Scotland §387 74 Northern Ireland §388 74 Disciplinary procedures §389 75 5.3 Future policy developments §392 75 SIX: RETAINING EFFECTIVE TEACHERS IN SCHOOLS 76 6.1 Identification of the main policy concerns §396 76 6.2 Data, trends and factors §399 76 Teachers leaving the profession for reasons other than retirement §399 76 England §400 77 Scotland §410 80 Wales §411 80 Northern Ireland §412 81 Retirement policies §413 81 Teacher absences §416 81 Leave of absence, sabbaticals and secondments §416 81 Sickness absence §423 82 Pupil behaviour and safety of teachers §430 83 Policies to retain effective teachers §435 84 Tackling workload §438 84 England and Wales §438 84 Scotland §452 87 Northern Ireland §453 87 6.3 Future policy developments §454 87 Bibliography 89 Acts of Parliament, Orders, etc. referred to in the Report 98 Web addresses for some organisations referred to in the Report 98 Abbreviations and Glossary 99 Appendix 1: Stakeholder contributors 103 Appendix 2: Current government-sponsored research projects 104 Appendix 3: Types of school in the UK and their distribution 107 iv CBR/UK(2003) LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 National and local government structures, UK, 2002 5 Figure 1.2 Pupil and teacher numbers in maintained schools in Scotland, actual (1999 – 11 2001) and projected (2002 – 2012) Figure 2.1 Percentage age pyramids, teachers in England, Wales (2002) and Scotland 24 (1998) Figure 2.2 Teachers associations and unions in the UK 29 Figure 3.1 Teacher vacancies in England 1989 – 2002 by school sector 31 Figure 3.2 Pupil and teacher numbers in England, 1985 – 2002, by sector 32 Figure 3.3 Vacancy rates in maintained nursery, primary, secondary and special schools by 33 government office region, England, and in Wales, January 2002 Figure 3.4 Vacancy rates in England for secondary subjects, January 2002 34 Figure 3.5 Inflow to teaching in the maintained sector in England: full-time and part-time, 35 2000-01 Figure 3.6 Age distribution of those completing teacher training in England, 1999 36 Figure 3.7 Full-time and part-time returners to teaching: women and men, 2000 – 01 43 Figure 5:1 Promotion level of teachers in England, 2000, by gender, age and phase 65 Figure 5.2 Promotion level of teachers in Scotland, 2000, by age and phase 68 Figure 5.3 Average salaries by age in England, March 2000 71 Figure 6.1 Outflow from teaching and returners to teaching, 2000-01 77 v CBR/UK(2003) LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Population aged 5-16 inclusive: actual (2001) and projections (2016, 2026), UK 10 Table 1.2 Sectoral employment vacancies, UK, 2001 13 Table 1.3 Distribution of expenditure per pupil in schools, 1999, UK and OECD mean 14 Table 2.1 Changes in the number of teachers in the past decade, by country and sector 23 Table 3.1 Recruitment to initial teacher training courses in England 2002-03 excluding 36 employment –based routes Table 3.2 Numbers entering teacher training in the UK, 1990 – 2001 36 Table 3.3 Proportion of those entering teacher training who (a) qualify and (b) enter 38 teaching, England and Wales (1998
Recommended publications
  • 24178 Cover.Indd
    School Teachers’ Review Body Twenty-First Report – 2012 Chair: Dame Patricia Hodgson, DBE Cm 8487 £29.75 School Teachers’ Review Body TWENTY-FIRST REPORT – 2012 Chair: Dame Patricia Hodgson, DBE Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Education by Command of Her Majesty December 2012 Cm 8487 £29.75 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: Office of Manpower Economics, Victoria House, Southampton Row, London WC1B 4AD http://www.ome.uk.com/enquiry/default.aspx This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk ISBN: 9780101848725 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002523873 11/12 24178 18534 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Consultees Organisations which made representations and provided evidence to the STRB ASCL Association of School and College Leaders ATL Association of Teachers and Lecturers BATOD British Association of Teachers of the Deaf DfE/the Department for Education Department four unions
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Primary School Smedley Lane, Cheetham, Manchester, M8 8SA
    School report Temple Primary School Smedley Lane, Cheetham, Manchester, M8 8SA Inspection dates 9–10 July 2013 Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Outstanding 1 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school. Pupils make good progress from starting Disabled pupils, those who have special points that are well below average. Pupils’ educational needs and those who are achievement is good and is particularly strong supported by the pupil premium make progress in English, because of the successful focus on equal to that of their peers. developing their speaking, reading and Leaders, managers and the governing body writing skills. have a relentless and successful focus on Pupils’ behaviour is excellent. Their very good providing the best possible opportunities for all conduct and manners are maintained both in pupils. lessons and around the school. They are Highly successful leaders and the very effective happy, confident and very keen to learn. governing body continually review the school’s Teaching is good over time and some is performance and ensure that anything that outstanding. Teachers ensure that pupils gain could be better is quickly identified and acted not only good academic skills, but develop upon. Consequently, the quality of teaching is their spiritual, moral, social and cultural improving and pupils’ achievement is rising. understanding equally well. It is not yet an outstanding school because Not all teaching is as good as the best yet.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 7 App 2 Ofsted Inspection of LSCB
    Appendix 2 Peterborough City Council Inspection of services for children in need of help and protection, children looked after and care leavers and Review of the effectiveness of the Local Safeguarding Children 1 Board 1 Ofsted produces this report under its power to combine reports in accordance with section 152 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. This report includes the report of the inspection of local authority functions carried out under section 136 of the Education and Inspection Act 2006 and the report of the review of the Local Safeguarding Children Board carried out under the Local Safeguarding Children Boards (Review) Regulations 2013. 101 Appendix 2 The Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) The Local Safeguarding Children Board is good An LSCB that is good coordinates the activity of statutory partners and monitors the effectiveness of local arrangements. Multi-agency training in the protection and care of children is effective and evaluated regularly for impact. The LSCB provides robust and rigorous evaluation and analysis of local performance that identifies areas for improvement and influences the planning and delivery of high-quality services. Executive summary The LSCB has played a key role in engaging partner agencies in the safeguarding agenda. It has monitored the work of agencies and provided both robust challenge and leadership in some important areas where services provided have not been good enough or have needed further development. It has been effective in coordinating responses to the considerable challenges presented by child sexual exploitation but although the LSCB monitors numbers of children at risk of child sexual exploitation, it has not consistently monitored the usage of risk assessment tools or the quality of assessments completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Earlscliffe (Sussex Summer Schools Ltd)
    Boarding report Earlscliffe (Sussex Summer Schools Ltd) 29 Shorncliffe Road, FOLKESTONE, Kent, CT20 2NB Inspection dates 23/01/2015 Overall effectiveness Good 2 Outcomes for boarders Outstanding 1 Quality of boarding provision and care Good 2 Boarders’ safety Good 2 Leadership and management of boarding Good 2 Summary of key findings The boarding provision is good because ● The boarding provision is an integral feature of the school. It has a positive impact on the quality of boarders’ lives and their opportunities for the future. The boarding provision clearly enhances boarders’ development, educationally, socially and culturally. In particular, the cultural diversity of the school promotes acceptance, tolerance and celebrates individuality. These themes are embedded in the school’s ethos. ● All staff have boarders’ safety at the heart of their practice. This is supported by clear policies and procedures which are understood by staff and consistently applied in practice. ● Boarders have very good relationships with staff, based on mutual respect and trust. Boarding facilities are well organised and run. They provide boarders with a comfortable, safe environment in which to thrive, develop and reach their full potential. ● The staff are very committed to the boarders. They strive to provide them with a high standard of individualised care. The school’s leaders are very involved in its day to day life. They have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development and are committed to driving towards excellence. ● Feedback from boarders and parents is very positive. Boarders feel safe and secure at the school. Parents praised the staff for their commitment to the boarders and the high standard of the communication from the school.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Mentoring in the Teach First Programme
    Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. Cameron, D. (2014) A study of mentoring in the Teach First programme. Ph.D. thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University. Contact: [email protected] A Study of Mentoring in the Teach First Programme by David Cameron Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 Abstract Policy trends in initial teacher training (ITT) in England have increasingly located training in schools, where trainee teachers are supported by practicing teachers designated as ‘mentors’. The nature of the mentoring that trainee teachers experience has been shown to be of critical importance, both to outcomes in the initial training period and also in terms of teachers’ professional identity construction and retention within the profession. School-based mentoring has been typically characterised, however, as of variable or inconsistent quality. Teach First is a teacher training programme with a number of features which set it apart from other routes into teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Health Systems of the United Kingdom: How Do They Compare?
    The four health systems of the United Kingdom: how do they compare? Gwyn Bevan, Marina Karanikolos, Jo Exley, Ellen Nolte, Sheelah Connolly and Nicholas Mays Source report April 2014 About this research This report is the fourth in a series dating back to 1999 which looks at how the publicly financed health care systems in the four countries of the UK have fared before and after devolution. The report was commissioned jointly by The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust. The research team was led by Nicholas Mays at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The research looks at how the four national health systems compare and how they have performed in terms of quality and productivity before and after devolution. The research also examines performance in North East England, which is acknowledged to be the region that is most comparable to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in terms of socioeconomic and other indicators. This report, along with an accompanying summary report, data appendices, digital outputs and a short report on the history of devolution (to be published later in 2014), are available to download free of charge at www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/compare-uk-health www.health.org.uk/compareUKhealth. Acknowledgements We are grateful: to government statisticians in the four countries for guidance on sources of data, highlighting problems of comparability and for checking the data we have used; for comments on the draft report from anonymous referees and from Vernon Bogdanor, Alec Morton and Laura Schang; and for guidance on national clinical audits from Nick Black and on nursing data from Jim Buchan.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for Education Minutes of Proceedings 3
    Northern Ireland Assembly COMMITTEE FOR EDUCATION Minutes of Proceedings WEDNESDAY 3 March 2021 Video Conference Present by Video Conference: Mr Chris Lyttle MLA (Chairperson) Mr Pat Sheehan MLA (Deputy Chairperson) Mr Maurice Bradley MLA Ms Nicola Brogan MLA Mr Robbie Butler MLA Mr William Humphrey MBE MLA Mr Daniel McCrossan MLA Mr Justin McNulty MLA Mr Robin Newton MBE MLA Apologies: None In Attendance: Ms Aoibhinn Treanor (Assembly Clerk) Mr Mark McQuade (Assistant Clerk) Mr Craig Mealey (Clerical Supervisor) Ms Emma Magee (Clerical Officer) The meeting commenced at 9:04 am in public session. 1. Apologies There were no apologies. 2. Chairperson’s Business 2.1 General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (GTCNI) The Chairperson reminded members that the Committee agreed to arrange oral briefings with the Department of Education and the General Teaching Council NI on its role, legal vires and stakeholder concerns at its meeting on Wednesday 24 March 2021. Agreed: The Committee agreed to be briefed informally by the Northern Ireland Teachers Council (NITC) on their concerns about GTCNI on 9 March 2021. 2.2 Tabled items The Committee noted correspondence from the Department in regard to school restart and exams; covid-19 vulnerable children plan benchmarking, vaccination and pandemic learning; the recruitment arrangements for a chairperson, vice- chairperson and panel member of the imminent New Decade New Approach Review of Education, which are unregulated appointments; and notification of the termination of the Transformation programme; for discussion with the Minister on 10 March. 2.3 Recent announcements The Chairperson informed members of the publication of the Department’s Emotional Health and Wellbeing Framework and of the Teachers’ Pay settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Dispositif: Towards a Critical Ontology of Policy and Power
    "Tea~h First" as a Dispositif: Towards a critical ontology of policy and power Patrick L.J. Bailey veL Institute of Education, London PhD Thesis June 2015 . 1 Declaration I, Patrick Bailey, hereby declare that, except where explicit attribution is made, the work presented in this thesis is entirely my own. Word Count 99,854 words Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the proper acknowledgement of the author. 2 Abstract This thesis is a study of power. More specifically, it is a study of some of the myriad forms and operations of power which animate and condition the present, and which can be observed in the governing of education policy. A material post-structural approach to policy sociology is developed and then deployed in exploring the ontology of the education state and the teacher. The thesis puts to work the 'methods' and 'sensibilities' of Foucauldian genealogy and critical ethnography, and in doing so attends to some of the history of power and its insinuations in the governing and administering of education. Drawing on Michel Foucault's methodological and analytical concept of the dispositif, education policy is conceptualised as an historical and contingent formation of material objects, discourses and practices - a policy dispositij. At the same time, dispositifis applied as an analytical device for investigating the 'micro-physics' and 'immanence' of power, or the different ways in which power operates in minute and molecular ways in individual and heterogeneous encounters. Dispositifis also applied as a critical tool for exposing the ways in which the present is conditioned and fabricated within, and by, multiple forces of enablement and constraint.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Education in Northern Ireland
    INTEGRATING EDUCATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND: Celebrating Inclusiveness and Fostering Innovation in our Schools November 2016 The Report of the Independent Review of Integrated Education to Mr Peter Weir MLA, Minister for Education, Northern Ireland by Prof Margaret Topping and Mr Colm M Cavanagh Celebrating Inclusion and Fostering Creativity in our Schools … Northern Ireland is an advanced, modern society. Its people are productive, literate, articulate. But for all its modernity and literacy, Northern Ireland has been divided, by a deep and ancient hatred, into two hostile communities, their enmity burnished by centuries of conflict. They have often inflicted hurt, physical and psychological, on members of the other community, and they have been quick to take offense at real or perceived slights. They have a highly developed sense of grievance. … Each is a minority … Each sees itself as a victim community, constantly under siege, the recipient of a long litany of violent blows from the other …. I wondered how it was possible to have two such completely different views of the same society. George J. Mitchell, Making Peace (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), pp.13 and 27. We are a conservative society that promotes safety over adventure and celebrates academic attainment by the gifted few over the creativity and teamwork of everyone. We [need] leadership centred on hope, aspiration and belief and the opportunity to be inspired by and learn from each other … If we make the change to education, we will rule the world. Steve Orr, Director, Catalyst Inc., in his 2016 Sir Bernard Crossland Lecture, Queen’s University Belfast.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for Education Meeting Minutes of Proceedings 9
    Northern Ireland Assembly COMMITTEE FOR EDUCATION Minutes of Proceedings WEDNESDAY 9 DECEMBER 2020 Video Conference and Room 30, Parliament Buildings, Belfast Present: Mr Chris Lyttle MLA (Chairperson) Ms Karen Mullan MLA (Deputy Chairperson) Ms Nicola Brogan MLA Mr Daniel McCrossan MLA Mr Robin Newton MBE MLA Present by Video Conference: Mr Maurice Bradley MLA Mr Robbie Butler MLA Mr William Humphrey MLA Mr Justin McNulty MLA Apologies: None In Attendance: Mr Peter McCallion (Assembly Clerk) Mr Mark McQuade (Assistant Clerk) Ms Paula Best (Clerical Supervisor) Ms Emma Magee (Clerical Officer) The meeting commenced at 9:35am in open session. 1. Apologies There were no apologies. 2. Chairperson’s Business 2.1 Cancellation of Scottish Highers The Chairperson advised Members that the Scottish Government had announced that owing to disruption to the provision of education in schools, there would be no Advanced or Higher end of year examinations in Scotland in 2021 and that grades would be awarded based on teacher judgements. Members recorded their concerns in respect of the absence of examination clarity in Northern Ireland. Some Members argued that GCSEs and A-levels should be cancelled in 2021 owing to disruption to the delivery of the curriculum caused by the pandemic. 2.2 Trends in International Maths and Science Study (TIMMS) The Chairperson advised Members that he and the Deputy Chairperson had met informally with Department of Education officials on 8 December 2020 in order to review the headline findings for Northern Ireland of the Trends in International Maths and Science Study 2019. The Committee recorded its congratulations to primary schools on the consistently positive results for mathematics at Primary 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Representativeness of the European Social Partner Organisations: Education
    Representativeness of the European social partner organisations: Education Objectives of study Economic background National level of interest representation European level of interest representation Commentary References Annex: List of abbreviations This report is available in electronic format only. Wyattville Road, Loughlinstown, Dublin 18, Ireland. - Tel: (+353 1) 204 31 00 - Fax: 282 42 09 / 282 64 56 e-mail: [email protected] - website: www.eurofound.europa.eu This study sets out to provide the necessary information for establishing and assisting sectoral social dialogue in the education sector. The report has three main parts: a summary of the sector’s economic background; an analysis of the social partner organisations in all EU Member States, with special emphasis on their membership, their role in collective bargaining/employment regulation and public policy, and their national and European affiliations; and an analysis of the relevant European organisations, in particular their membership composition and their capacity to negotiate. The aim of the EIRO series of representativeness studies is to identify the relevant national and supranational social partner organisations in the field of industrial relations in selected sectors. The impetus for these studies arises from the goal of the European Commission to recognise the representative social partner organisations to be consulted under the EC Treaty provisions. Hence, this study is designed to provide the basic information required to establish and evaluate sectoral social dialogue. Objectives of study The aim of this representativeness study is to identify the relevant national and supranational associational actors – that is the trade unions and employer associations – in the field of industrial relations in the education sector, and to show how these actors relate to the sector’s European interest associations of labour and business.
    [Show full text]
  • Teach for All. Investing In
    SESSION SUMMARY: THE CASE FOR SUPPORT One important element to bolster our ​The purpose of this session is to seek fundraising strategy is how we make your feedback to inform the next revision. the case for an investment in Teach We’re particularly interested in your For All. We’re sharing a draft feedback on the following questions: presentation that we’ve recently • Does our story come across clearly? revised based on feedback received. • Is it compelling? We are looking forward to the Board’s • Are there parts of this presentation further feedback. While we wouldn’t that are working well? envision using this presentation within • Is this too long or not detailed enough? meetings, the flow is similar to what we talk through with people, and we • What would you like to see that you would envision using slides such as aren’t seeing here? these as follow up. • How would you suggest improving this? We have also included an optional read that describes the global operations and initiatives we raise money for. 1 Investing in the Rising Generation 2 EVERY CHILD HAS THE POTENTIAL TO SHAPE A BRIGHTER FUTURE But around the world children don’t have the education, support, and opportunity they need to fulfill that potential And when millions of children aren’t learning, the results are devastating — perpetuating poverty, dividing societies, and weakening economies. 3 THERE’S NO SINGLE SOLUTION TO SUCH A COMPLEX PROBLEM To change the status quo for children in marginalized communities we have to address their needs both within and beyond the classroom
    [Show full text]