Kristiina Korhonen FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT in a CHANGING

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kristiina Korhonen FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT in a CHANGING K ristiina K ORHONEN : FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN A CHANGING POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT A CHANGING POLITICAL : FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN Kristiina Korhonen FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN A CHANGING POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT FINNISH INVESTMENT DECISIONS IN SOUTH KOREA A-265 ISSN 1237-556X HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS ISBN 951-791-973-5 2005 ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OECONOMICAE HELSINGIENSIS A-265 Kristiina Korhonen FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN A CHANGING POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT FINNISH INVESTMENT DECISIONS IN SOUTH KOREA HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OECONOMICAE HELSINGIENSIS A-265 © Kristiina Korhonen and Helsinki School of Economics ISSN 1237-556X ISBN 951-791-973-5 ISBN 951-791-974-3 (e-version) Helsinki School of Economics - HSE Print 2005 Acknowledgements The initial impetus for this study was given years ago by Professor Park Sam-Ock at the Seoul National University. Therefore, with great honour, it has been a pleasure to have him as official examiner and opponent of this study. Accordingly, it has been a great privilege to have the leading Finnish scholar in foreign direct investment, Professor Jorma Larimo from the University of Vaasa as the official examiner of my study. The study was conducted at the Helsinki School of Economics (HSE), including the Department of Marketing, the Center for Doctoral Studies and the Center for Markets in Transition (CEMAT). I am also thankful for an opportunity to conduct parts of my study at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) in Copenhagen in 2004. I would like to express my deep appreciation to several individuals for their support. I started my studies under the guidance of Professor Emeritus Kai-Veikko Vuoristo, who is certainly one of the key persons behind my interest in Asia. Especially, I want to thank him for writing dozens of successful references throughout the years. His successor, Professor Jarmo Eronen read carefully several versions of my study and gave many constructive comments that helped me to progress in my study. Professor Emeritus Niilo Home made a significant contribution in supervising my study in terms of thesis structure and logic. Dr. Pekka Killström shared his insight into the strategy-performance model and made numerous valuable suggestions for the improvement of my study. Professor Emeritus Reijo Luostarinen discussed with me on the general setting of the study and the methodologies. I am also thankful to Professor Riitta Kosonen, who has offered me an opportunity to continue with the post doctoral studies at the CEMAT. My sincere thanks for the inspiring discussions go to Dr. Erja Kettunen-Matilainen. I have also received help and suggestions from Dr. Jorma Pietala, Dr. Sonn Jung-Won, M.Sc. Laura Erkkilä, M.Sc. Virva Haltsonen, Manager Lee Byung-min, System Architect Antti Lehtinen, M.Sc. Jarkko Lehtinen, M.Sc. Mervi Lipponen, M.Sc. Réa Maxwell, and LL.M. Mikko Saarikivi. I am grateful to all respondents and interviewees involved in this study. Their interest and patience in answering my questions has been invaluable. The personnel of the Korean Embassy and the Korea Trade Center in Helsinki has always been willing to help me. Furthermore, I am indebted to all of those Korean professors, research fellows, civil servants, diplomats and other individuals, who deepened my understanding of Korea and Koreans during seven years in Korea, in and out, in the 1990s. For the financial support, I want to express my gratitude to the Foundation for Economic Education, the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, the Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation, the HSE, the Research Foundation of the HSE, Marcus Wallenbergin liiketaloudellinen tutkimussäätiö, and the NIAS. This is probably the right place to thank also my mother Eira Korhonen for financial aid as well as childcare. My father Rauno Korhonen, who found himself in Korea long before me in the 1950s, could not see this study completed. This study would not have been possible without the support and persuasion of Dr. Pekka Killström. I want to thank him on the intellectual companionship we have shared. My daughter Choi Yoon-Hee has sacrificed evenings, weekends and holidays for omma’s research. I hope that I did not place too heavy demands on the ten year old girl and that my love tempered her longing. Helsinki, November 2005 Kristiina Korhonen Abstract This dissertation contributes to an understanding of foreign direct investment (FDI) in a changing political environment. The theoretical framework of the study is positioned to the geography of enterprise approach, but it has been contributed with theories from the fields of strategic management, international business, and political economy. The empirical focus is on the Finnish investment decisions in South Korea (hereafter Korea). The research problem of the study asks how a transnational corporation (TNC) perceives and reacts to the change in the host country’s political environment. Investment literature has basically studied the spatial aspects of FDI separately from the growth and performance of the firms, while the present study aims to combine them. The present study argues firstly that the relevant factors having an impact on the investment decisions and the performance of the TNCs can be recognised with the help of Lahti’s strategy-performance model. The model is modified by incorporating the general macro-environment of the firm explicitly to the model. Based on literature, it is believed that firms interpret the location conditions of the host country into a special set of location factors, which are crucial from their strategy perspective. With the help of the modified strategy-performance model, the firm’s relative optimal location can be explained by linking the location of the firm to the purposes of the firm: the firm invests where it can operate successfully. Secondly, the present study argues that the political environment of the firm in the host country may have a special role among the other parts of the firm’s environment (natural, economic, demographic, cultural, and technological). The argument is based on the supremacy of the host government to use its political power in order to intervene in FDI. On the other hand, the literature has emphasised the TNCs abilities to bargain with the host government. The present study states that TNC may not need to bargain alone but may lobby help from its home government. Therefore, this study adds a concept of authority services to the list of TNC’s bargaining techniques. The modified strategy-performance model was empirically applied to the case of Finnish investment in Korea during 1984-2002 when Korea’s political environment and investment policy in particular underwent profound change. The turning point is year 1998 when the Korean government drastically liberalised its investment policy in the aftermath of the Asian crisis. Therefore, the present study compares Finnish investment during the restrictive period in 1984-1997 with the liberal period in 1998-2002. The data includes national and regional level statistical data from both Finnish and Korean sources, as well as firm level data from Finnish investors collected using a questionnaire. Both types of data are supplemented and cross-checked by interviews. The empirical results suggest that the change in the political environment in Korea in 1998 had a clear impact on Finnish investment in Korea. However, the change cannot be totally separated from the other simultaneous changes, among which, the role of technological environment of the firm in Korea has been the most influential. The empirical results indicate that repeat investments had been engaged regardless of the investment policy liberalisation, but the acquisitions had not taken place without the change in Korea’s investment policy. In a changing political environment, the authority services provided by the Finnish government were crucial to Finnish investors. 1 The empirical results suggest that the the modified strategy-performance model can be successfully used to analyse the impact of change in the firm’s external environment. However, any further evidence on the particular role of the political environment among the other parts of the firm’s general macro-environment was not found. Each firm emphasised different variables of the external environment, which reflects the fact that firms perceive the same host country differently according to their strategies. Therefore, each firm also reacts to the political change differently. This justifies the use of concepts of location conditions and location factors. The results indicate that firms scan their political environment continuously in order to anticipate and respond to possible changes. Therefore, respondents did not regard the political environment of the firm as important, although it had an impact on their investment decision-making. Key words: foreign direct investment, political environment, strategy-performance model, location conditions, location factors, South Korea, Finnish investment 2 Table of contents Abstract............................................................................................................................. 1 Table of contents .............................................................................................................. 3 List of figures ................................................................................................................... 5 List of tables ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Opposition Landslide in Mayoral Elections Shifts Political Landscape
    Opposition landslide in mayoral elections shifts political landscape 12 April 2021 Mayoral candidates from the conservative opposition People Power Party, Oh Se- hoon in Seoul and Park Hyung-joon in Busan, swept to victory on 7 April in a major upset for the ruling Democratic Party and its President, Moon Jae-in. The results show how Moon’s popularity has waned since he secured a 180-seat majority in the National Assembly elections last April. Moon’s reform agenda – to reduce the power of prosecutors and cool the property market – has encountered fierce opposition and, in the case of the property measures, backfired. The People Power Party’s twin victories highlight the level of public fatigue at the extreme confrontation between the Prosecutor's Office and the Minister of Justice, as well as disillusionment with ballooning house prices and rents, despite reforms that were supposed to provide relief to first-time buyers and tenants. Public anger against Moon’s Democratic Party was also exacerbated by land speculation by employees of the Korea Land & Housing Corporation, a public institution, based on their access to insider information about the development of a new town, an issue that was uncovered just before the election. Efforts to improve inter-Korean relations, a key focus of the Moon administration, have also fallen into stalemate, further contributing to falls in the ruling party’s popularity. While the People’s Power Party fought fiercely against Moon’s reforms, it has been criticised for failing to provide realistic policy alternatives. The party is also tainted by historic ties, not only to big business and the military, but also to the impeachment of former President Park Geun-hye by the Constitutional Court in 2017 – a first in Korean history.
    [Show full text]
  • Roh Moo-Hyun President of the Republic of Korea President Roh Moo-Hyun Is Interviewed by CNN in New York
    Towards Age of Peace and Prosperity Roh Moo-hyun President of the Republic of Korea President Roh Moo-hyun is interviewed by CNN in New York. (September 15, 2005) Towards Age of Peace and Prosperity Roh Moo-hyun President of the Republic of Korea CONTENTS 03 Personal History 04 Dynamic Korea: A Nation on the Move 12 Participatory Government 18 A Biographical Sketch 28 Remarks by President Roh Moo-hyun At a Cheong Wa Dae press conference, President Roh clarifies the Government’s position on North Korea’s nuclear test while explaining the outcome of the Korea-Japan summit meeting. (October 9, 2006) Personal History DATE OF BIRTH CAREER August 6, 1946 2003. 2 1991 PLACE OF BIRTH Sworn in as President of the Republic of Spokesman for the United Democratic Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea Korea Party FAMILY 2002.12 1988 Married to Kwon Yang-suk with Elected as the 16th President of the Member, National Assembly Special one son and one daughter Republic of Korea Committee to Investigate Political Corruption during the Fifth Republic 2001 Advisor and Senior Member, 1988 EDUCATION Central Committee of the Millennium Elected to the 13th National Assembly in 1966 Democratic Party Busan’s Eastern District Graduated from Busan Commercial High School 2000. 8 ~ 2001. 3 1987 Minister of Maritime Affairs and Chairman and Director, Busan Fisheries Headquarters of the Citizens Movement for a Democratic Constitution (also PUBLICATIONS 1998 served as one of the leaders of the June 2002 Elected to the 15th National Assembly in Democratization Struggles of
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Pdf in English
    No. 02 Friday-Sunday, November 20-22, 2020 OPINION & PERSPECTIVE 9 America wants to heal divisions CARTOON from JoongAng Ilbo Jung Hyo-sik The incoming U.S. presidential ad- ministration of Joe Biden will in- clude China hardliners, but there will also be voices for cooperation, and Korea should encourage the United States to avoid stoking a new Cold War, said Jeffrey D. Sachs, a world-renowned economics profes- sor. In an interview with the Joon- gAng Ilbo on Thursday, Sachs, a Columbia University professor, said fostering cooperation, instead of a Cold War-style competition, with China is crucial to addressing the challenges of the Covid-19 pan- demic, economic recovery, climate change, nuclear disarmament and Conflict peaceful use of digital technologies. In the interview, which focused on the outcome of the 2020 U.S. PARK YONG-SEOK presidential election and expecta- Despite the increasing mudslinging between Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae and Prosecutor General Yoon Seok- tions for the Biden administration, youl, President Moon Jae-in has been silent since her appointment as justice minister in January. These days, Sachs warned against the idea of a the president has turned away from their conflict entirely. new Cold War with China, a con- cept associated with the presidency of Donald Trump. “It is important not to pursue a OTHER VIEWS crusade against China,” he said. “That would be wrongheaded and dangerous for the entire world.” Gadeok Island Airport project should return to starting point Biden has been a strong backer of U.S.-China cooperation in the As the new Gimhae Airport verification committee a minimum of seven trillion to 10 trillion won ($9 past, who supported China joining under the Office of the Prime Minister decided on billion), is an abuse of the majority party’s legislative the World Trade Organization, but JANG JIN-YOUNG Tuesday to nullify the Gimhae Airport expansion power.
    [Show full text]
  • Busan Republic of Korea
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Education Education Management and Infrastructure Division Programme on Institutional Management of Higher Education (IMHE) Supporting the contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development Peer Review Report: Busan Republic of Korea Chris Duke, Henry Etzkowitz, Fumi Kitagawa and Byung-Shik Rhee The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the OECD or its Member countries. 1 This Peer Review Report is based on the review visit to the Busan Metropolitan City in December 2005, the regional Self-Evaluation Report, and other background material. As a result, the report reflects the situation up to that period. The preparation and completion of this report would not have been possible without the support of very many people and organisations. OECD/IMHE and the Peer Review Team for the Busan Metropolitan City wish to acknowledge the substantial contribution of the region, particularly through its Coordinator, the authors of the Self-Evaluation Report, and its Regional Steering Group. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE...................................................................................................................................... 5 NOTES ON CURRENCIES.......................................................................................................... 6 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS...................................................................................... 7 LISTS OF TABLES AND BOXES..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asiamaior2020-Korea.Pdf
    CENTRO STUDI PER I POPOLI EXTRA-EUROPEI “CESARE BONACOSSA” - UNIVERSITÀ DI PAVIA ASIA MAIOR The Journal of the Italian think tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989 Vol. XXXI / 2020 Asia in 2020: Coping with COVID-19 and other crises Edited by Michelguglielmo Torri Nicola Mocci Filippo Boni viella Asia Maior. The Journal of the Italian Think Tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989. Copyright © 2021 - Viella s.r.l. & Associazione Asia Maior ISBN 978-88-3313-827-5 (Paper) ISBN 978-88-3313-828-2 (Online) ISSN 2385-2526 (Paper) ISSN 2612-6680 (Online) Annual journal - Vol. XXXI, 2020 This journal is published jointly by the think tank Asia Maior (Associazione Asia Maior) & the CSPE - Centro Studi per i Popoli extra-europei «Cesare Bonacossa», University of Pavia Asia Maior. The Journal of the Italian Think Tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989 is an open-access journal, whose issues and single articles can be freely downloaded from the think tank webpage: www.asiamaior.org. The reference year is the one on which the analyses of the volume are fo- cused. Each Asia Maior volume is always published in the year following the one indicated on the cover. Paper version Italy € 50.00 Abroad € 65.00 Subscription [email protected] www.viella.it EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-chief (direttore responsabile): Michelguglielmo Torri, University of Turin. Co-editors: Nicola Mocci, University of Florence. Filippo Boni, The Open University. Associate editors: Axel Berkofsky, University of Pavia; Diego Maiorano, National University of Singapore, ISAS - Institute of South Asian Studies; Giulio Pugliese, King’s College London; Emanuela Mangiarotti, University of Pavia; Pierluigi Valsecchi, University of Pavia.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Exchange Busan, Republic
    History of Exchange Busan, Republic of Korea Chicago’s Sister City Since 2007 Chairs: Nam Hung Paik and Susan Hollender 2007 May 7 Focus: Signing Agreement The Official Signing of the Chicago-Busan Sister City Agreement took place at the Chicago Cultural Center on Monday, May 7, 2007. The agreement was signed by The Honorable Richard M. Daley, Mayor of Chicago and The Honorable Hur Nam-sik, Mayor of Busan. October 10 Focus: Culture Hyden Yoo, from Akira Men, represented Busan in the World Fashion Chicago runway show, which featured designers with roots in Chicago’s 27 Sister Cities. December 28 Focus: Culture Busan was represented in ABC-7’s week-long “Christmas Around the World” segment. Dduk Gook (rice-cake soup) and mandarin oranges were presented as a Christmas custom Korea. 2008 May Focus: Education Korean Language students from Northside College Prep High School visited their counterparts in Busan over spring break. June 2-6 Focus: Culture Delmonico Restaurant represented Busan during the Chicago Sister Cities International Festival. July Focus: Education Principals of Chicago’s Northside College Prep and Busan’s Korea Science Academy sign Sister School Agreement. October 10 Focus: Culture Suk Ja and Beth Lambert, Scarlet Designs represented Busan at the World Fashion Chicago runway show. 2009 January 1 Focus: Government Mayor Daley welcomed Mayor Hur, Nam-Sik to Chicago and they shared ideas about strengthening the Sister Cities relationship between Chicago and Busan. In addition, Mayor Daley appointed new Busan committee chair, Nam Hung Paik. February 3 Focus: Government Mayor Richard M. Daley met with The Honorable Dong Guen Seol, Head of the Metropolitan Office of Education in Busan, Korea, at City hall to share ideas about strengthening the educational partnership between Chicago and Busan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diplomatic Conflict Between South Korea and Japan: Has the Candlelight Revolution Become the Curse of Liberal Democracy?
    Revista UNISCI / UNISCI Journal, Nº 52 (January/Enero 2020) THE DIPLOMATIC CONFLICT BETWEEN SOUTH KOREA AND JAPAN: HAS THE CANDLELIGHT REVOLUTION BECOME THE CURSE OF LIBERAL DEMOCRACY? Jaejun Sung 1 Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Abstract This article will analyze why Moon’s administration have caused the current conflict with Japan and how the government has exploited the situation. In particular, this paper will examine the reason why Moon’s administration denies the “Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea” which was signed in 1965 and doggedly insists that Japan is responsible for this conflict. As the conclusion of this paper, we can see the issues occurring in South Korea regarding Japan can be attributable to the ideological basis. Keywords : Candlelight Revolution, Jeogpyecheongsan, relationship between South Korea and Japan. Título en Castellano: El conflicto diplomático entre Corea del Sur y Japón: ¿Se ha convertido la revolución de las velas en la maldición de la democracia liberal? Resumen Este artículo analiza por qué la administración de Moon ha causado el conflicto actual con Japón y cómo el gobierno ha explotado la situación. En particular, este documento examinará la razón por la que la administración Moon niega el "Tratado sobre las relaciones básicas entre Japón y la República de Corea", que se firmó en 1965 e insiste tenazmente en que Japón es responsable de este conflicto. Como conclusión de este artículo, podemos ver que las cuestiones que se plantean en Corea del Sur con respecto a Japón pueden atribuirse a un planteamiento ideológico. Palabras Clave : La revolución de las velas, Jeogpyecheongsan, relaciones entre Corea del Sur y Japón Copyright © UNISCI, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Korea 2020 Human Rights Report
    REPUBLIC OF KOREA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Republic of Korea (South Korea) is a constitutional democracy governed by a president and a unicameral legislature. Observers considered the presidential election in 2017 and the April 15 legislative elections free and fair. Moon Jae-in was elected president in an early election following the impeachment of former president Park Geun-hye. The Korean National Police Agency, under the supervision of the Ministry of the Interior and Safety, is responsible for internal security over land, and the Korea Coast Guard has jurisdiction over the sea. The National Intelligence Service investigates suspected criminal activity related to national security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over security forces, and the government utilized effective mechanisms to investigate and punish abuse of power. Significant human rights issues included: restrictions on freedom of expression, including criminalizing the sending of leaflets and other materials into North Korea, and the existence of criminal libel laws; corruption; and laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults in the military. The government took steps to prosecute officials who committed abuses. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office has responsibility for investigating whether killings by civilian security forces are justified and pursuing prosecution when appropriate. Military police investigate killings by military personnel. b. Disappearance There were no reports of disappearances by or on behalf of government authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • ID Number A1-2006-0103-Eng Title EAI ․ SBS ․ Joongang Daily
    ID Number A1-2006-0103-Eng EAI ․ SBS ․ JoongAng Daily ․ Hankook Research Panel Title Survey on the 2006 Regional Elections : Busan <Note> ※ Response options marked with asterisks (*) were not read to Respondents Panel Survey of Election 2006 Busan 1st Wave (April 26, 2006) Districts 1) Jung-gu 2) Seo-gu 3) Dong-gu 4) Yeongdo-gu 5) Busanjin-gu 6) Dongnae-gu 7) Nam-gu 8) Buk-gu 9) Haeundae-gu 10) Saha-gu 11) Geumjeong-gu 12) Gangseo-gu 13) Yeonje-gu 14) Suyeong-gu 15) Sasang-gu 16) Gijang-gun Sex 1) Male 2) Female Age: Could you please tell me how old you are? Age _________ in years 1 1. If the Busan mayoral election were tomorrow, which of the following candidates would you vote for? 1) Oh Keo-don (Yeollin Uri Party) 2) Hur Nam-Shik (Grand National Party) ⇒ GO TO Q1-1 3) Kim Seok-Joon (Democratic Labor Party) 10) Other candidate ------------------------------------------------------------- 11) Not yet decided 12) Would not vote ⇒ GO TO Q1-2 99) Don’t know/No answer* 1-1. What makes you decide to vote for (R’S ANSWER IN Q1)? 1) Candidate’s political party affiliation ⇒ GO TO Q1-1-1 2) Candidate him/herself ⇒ GO TO Q1-1-2 3) Candidate’s platforms and policies ⇒ GO TO Q2 4) Chance of winning ⇒ GO TO Q2 5) Other ⇒ GO TO Q2 1-1-1. (ONLY FOR R ANSWERED "1" IN Q1-1) What do you like about the party? 1) Ideology or policy orientation 2) Major politicians of the party 3) Efforts for regional development 4) Chance of winning the next presidential election 5) Other 1-1-2.
    [Show full text]