Engineering a Long-Acting, Potent GLP-1 Analog for Microstructure-Based Transdermal Delivery
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Review of Current Real-World Experience with Teriparatide As Treatment of Osteoporosis in Different Patient Groups
Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Review of Current Real-World Experience with Teriparatide as Treatment of Osteoporosis in Different Patient Groups Barbara Hauser 1,2,* , Nerea Alonso 2 and Philip L Riches 1,2 1 Rheumatic Disease Unit, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; [email protected] 2 Rheumatology and Bone Disease Unit, Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Teriparatide has proven effective in reducing both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in clinical trials of post-menopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Widespread adoption of Teriparatide over the last two decades means that there is now substantial experience of its use in routine clinical practice, which is summarized in this paper. Extensive real-world experience of Teriparatide in post-menopausal osteoporosis confirms the fracture and bone density benefits seen in clinical trials, with similar outcomes identified also in male and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Conversely, very limited experience has been reported in pre-menopausal osteoporosis or in the use of Teriparatide in combination with other therapies. Surveillance studies have identified no safety signals relating to the possible association of Teriparatide with osteosarcoma. We also review the evidence for predicting response to Teriparatide in order to inform the debate on where best to use Teriparatide in an increasingly crowded therapeutic landscape. Citation: Hauser, B.; Alonso, N.; Riches, P.L. Review of Current Keywords: Teriparatide; anabolic treatment; osteoporosis; fracture Real-World Experience with Teriparatide as Treatment of Osteoporosis in Different Patient Groups. -
The Activation of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor by Peptide and Non-Peptide Ligands
The Activation of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor by Peptide and Non-Peptide Ligands Clare Louise Wishart Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Science University of Leeds School of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Biological Sciences September 2013 I Intellectual Property and Publication Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Clare Louise Wishart to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2013 The University of Leeds and Clare Louise Wishart. II Acknowledgments Firstly I would like to offer my sincerest thanks and gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Dan Donnelly, who has been nothing but encouraging and engaging from day one. I have thoroughly enjoyed every moment of working alongside him and learning from his guidance and wisdom. My thanks go to my academic assessor Professor Paul Milner whom I have known for several years, and during my time at the University of Leeds he has offered me invaluable advice and inspiration. Additionally I would like to thank my academic project advisor Dr. Michael Harrison for his friendship, help and advice. I would like to thank Dr. Rosalind Mann and Dr. Elsayed Nasr for welcoming me into the lab as a new PhD student and sharing their experimental techniques with me, these techniques have helped me no end in my time as a research student. -
Exploring the Concept of Safety and Tolerability
SECOND ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON CLINICAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS April 25, 2017 Bethesda, MD Co-sponsored by Session 1 Exploring the Concepts of Safety and Tolerability: Incorporating the Patient Voice SECOND ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON CLINICAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS April 25, 2017 Bethesda, MD Co-sponsored by Disclaimer • The views and opinions expressed in the following slides are those of the individual presenters and should not be attributed to their respective organizations/companies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the Critical Path Institute. • These slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenters and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 3 Session Participants Chair • Bindu Kanapuru, MD – Medical Officer, Division of Hematology Products, OHOP, FDA Presenters • James (Randy) Hillard, MD – Professor of Psychiatry, Michigan State University • Crystal Denlinger, MD, FACP – Associate Professor, Department of Hematology/Oncology; Chief, Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; Director, Survivorship Program; Deputy Director, Phase 1 Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center • Katherine Soltys, MD – Acting Director, Bureau of Medical Sciences, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada • Karen E. Arscott, DO, MSc – Associate Professor of Medicine-Patient Advocate and Survivor, Geisinger Commonwealth -
Bugs, Drugs, and Cancer: Can the Microbiome Be a Potential
REVIEWS Drug Discovery Today Volume 24, Number 4 April 2019 Reviews Bugs, drugs, and cancer: can the GENE TO SCREEN microbiome be a potential therapeutic target for cancer management? 1,z 2,z 1 1 Biying Chen , Guangye Du , Jiahui Guo and Yanjie Zhang 1 Department of Oncology, Shanghai 9th People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 280 Mohe Road, Shanghai, 201999, China 2 Department of Pathology, Shanghai 9th People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 280 Mohe Road, Shanghai, 201999, China Outnumbering our own cells over ten times, gut microbes can even be considered an additional organ. Several studies have explored the association between microbiomes and antitumor drug response. It has been reported that the presence of specific bacteria might modulate cancer progression and the efficacy of anticancer therapeutics. Bacteria-targeting intervention can provide crucial guidance for the design of next-generation antitumor drugs. Here, we review previous findings elucidating the impact of gut microbiomes on cancer treatment and the possible underlying mechanisms. In addition, we examine the role of microbiome manipulation in controlling tumor growth. Finally, we discuss concerns regarding the alteration of the microbiome composition, and the potential approaches to surpass existing limitations. Introduction cantly during life [5] (Fig. 1). Gut microbial density increases from The microbiota is defined as all microorganisms that are associated the proximal to the distal GI tract and along the tissue–lumen axis. with a specific host cellular environment [1]. These microorganisms Similarly, diversity further increases in the same pattern [6]. More- are identified using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA)sequencing. -
Novel Therapies in Osteoporosis: PTH-Related Peptide Analogs and Inhibitors of Sclerostin
62 2 Journal of Molecular T D Rachner et al. Novel anabolic osteoporosis 62:2 R145–R154 Endocrinology treatments REVIEW Novel therapies in osteoporosis: PTH-related peptide analogs and inhibitors of sclerostin Tilman D Rachner1,2,3, Lorenz C Hofbauer1,2,3,4, Andy Göbel1,3 and Elena Tsourdi1,2,3 1Department of Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center, Dresden, Germany 2Center for Healthy Aging, Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center, Dresden, Germany 3German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany 4Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to T D Rachner: [email protected] Abstract Bone-forming approaches to treat patients with severe osteoporosis are effective, but Key Words treatment options are limited, and there is an unmet clinical need for additional drugs. f PTH This review discusses two novel and advanced anabolic therapeutic concepts that f PTH-related protein have successfully completed phase 3 trials. Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody f abaloparatide that targets the Wnt inhibitor sclerostin. Two phase 3 trials (FRAME and ARCH) of f sclerostin romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis have been completed. f sclerostin antibody Both trials successfully reached their primary endpoint by reducing vertebral fractures by f romosozumab 75% compared to placebo (FRAME trial) and 48% compared to alendronate (ARCH trial), respectively. Abaloparatide is a PTH-related protein (PTHrP) analog that has displayed bone anabolic activity. In the phase 3 ACTIVE trial, abaloparatide was compared to placebo and teriparatide for 18 months in postmenopausal women who had already experienced an osteoporotic fracture. -
Live Biotherapeutic Products, a Road Map for Safety Assessment
Live Biotherapeutic Products, A Road Map for Safety Assessment Alice Rouanet, Selin Bolca, Audrey Bru, Ingmar Claes, Helene Cvejic, Haymen Girgis, Ashton Harper, Sidonie Lavergne, Sophie Mathys, Marco Pane, et al. To cite this version: Alice Rouanet, Selin Bolca, Audrey Bru, Ingmar Claes, Helene Cvejic, et al.. Live Biotherapeutic Products, A Road Map for Safety Assessment. Frontiers in Medicine, Frontiers media, 2020, 7, 10.3389/fmed.2020.00237. hal-02900344 HAL Id: hal-02900344 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02900344 Submitted on 8 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS published: 19 June 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00237 Live Biotherapeutic Products, A Road Map for Safety Assessment Alice Rouanet 1, Selin Bolca 2†, Audrey Bru 3†, Ingmar Claes 4†, Helene Cvejic 5,6†, Haymen Girgis 7†, Ashton Harper 8†, Sidonie N. Lavergne 9†, Sophie Mathys 10†, Marco Pane 11†, Bruno Pot 12,13†, Colette Shortt 14†, Wynand Alkema 15, Constance Bezulowsky 16, Stephanie Blanquet-Diot 17, Christophe Chassard 18, Sandrine P. Claus 19, Benjamin Hadida 20, Charlotte Hemmingsen 21, Cyrille Jeune 7, Björn Lindman 22, Garikai Midzi 8, Luca Mogna 11, Charlotta Movitz 22, Nail Nasir 23, 24 25 25 26 Edited by: Manfred Oberreither , Jos F. -
NMR Spectroscopy for Protein Higher Order Structure Similarity Assessment in Formulated Drug Products
molecules Article NMR Spectroscopy for Protein Higher Order Structure Similarity Assessment in Formulated Drug Products Deyun Wang 1, You Zhuo 2, Mike Karfunkle 3, Sharadrao M. Patil 2, Cameron J. Smith 4, David A. Keire 5 and Kang Chen 2,* 1 Northeast Medical Products Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Science, Office of Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jamaica, NY 11433, USA; [email protected] 2 Division of Complex Drug Analysis, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (S.M.P.) 3 Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; [email protected] 4 Division of Liquid Based Products I, Office of Lifecycle Drug Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA; [email protected] 5 Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-240-402-5550 Abstract: Peptide and protein drug molecules fold into higher order structures (HOS) in formulation and these folded structures are often critical for drug efficacy and safety. Generic or biosimilar drug Citation: Wang, D.; Zhuo, Y.; products (DPs) need to show similar HOS to the reference product. -
AACE Annual Meeting 2021 Abstracts Editorial Board
June 2021 Volume 27, Number 6S AACE Annual Meeting 2021 Abstracts Editorial board Editor-in-Chief Pauline M. Camacho, MD, FACE Suleiman Mustafa-Kutana, BSC, MB, CHB, MSC Maywood, Illinois, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Vin Tangpricha, MD, PhD, FACE Atlanta, Georgia, United States Andrea Coviello, MD, MSE, MMCi Karel Pacak, MD, PhD, DSc Durham, North Carolina, United States Bethesda, Maryland, United States Associate Editors Natalie E. Cusano, MD, MS Amanda Powell, MD Maria Papaleontiou, MD New York, New York, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States Tobias Else, MD Gregory Randolph, MD Melissa Putman, MD Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Vahab Fatourechi, MD Daniel J. Rubin, MD, MSc Harold Rosen, MD Rochester, Minnesota, United States Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Ruth Freeman, MD Joshua D. Safer, MD Nicholas Tritos, MD, DS, FACP, FACE New York, New York, United States New York, New York, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Rajesh K. Garg, MD Pankaj Shah, MD Boston, Massachusetts, United States Staff Rochester, Minnesota, United States Eliza B. Geer, MD Joseph L. Shaker, MD Paul A. Markowski New York, New York, United States Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States CEO Roma Gianchandani, MD Lance Sloan, MD, MS Elizabeth Lepkowski Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States Lufkin, Texas, United States Chief Learning Officer Martin M. Grajower, MD, FACP, FACE Takara L. Stanley, MD Lori Clawges The Bronx, New York, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Senior Managing Editor Allen S. Ho, MD Devin Steenkamp, MD Corrie Williams Los Angeles, California, United States Boston, Massachusetts, United States Peer Review Manager Michael F. -
2017 Fda Peptide Harvest
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 April 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201804.0126.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 42; doi:10.3390/ph11020042 1 Review 2 2017 FDA PEPTIDE HARVEST 3 Othman Al Musaimi,1,2,# Danah Alshaer, 1,2,# Beatriz G. de la Torre,3,* Fernando Albericio,2,4,5.* 4 1 College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa 5 2 School of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa 6 3 KRISP, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa 7 4 CIBER-BBN, Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, University of 8 Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 9 5 Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 10 * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected]; Tel.: +27-614009144 11 12 13 Abstract: 2017 was an excellent year in terms of new drugs (chemical entities and biologics) 14 approved by the FDA, with a total of forty-six. In turn, one of the highlights was the number of 15 peptides (six) included in this list. Here, the six peptides are analysed in terms of chemical structure, 16 synthetic strategy used for their production, source, biological target, and mode of action. 17 Keywords: pharmaceutical market; drugs; drug discovery; solid-phase peptide synthesis 18 Introduction 19 The financial investment associated with the pharmaceutical industry is one of the largest in the 20 industrial sector—surpassed only by the telecommunications sector. However, the number of new 21 products (drugs) entering the market each year is relatively low. -
Pharmacology Part 2: Introduction to Pharmacokinetics
J of Nuclear Medicine Technology, first published online May 3, 2018 as doi:10.2967/jnmt.117.199638 PHARMACOLOGY PART 2: INTRODUCTION TO PHARMACOKINETICS. Geoffrey M Currie Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia. Regis University, Boston, USA. Correspondence: Geoff Currie Faculty of Science Locked Bag 588 Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga 2678 Australia Telephone: 02 69332822 Facsimile: 02 69332588 Email: [email protected] Foot line: Introduction to Pharmacokinetics 1 Abstract Pharmacology principles provide key understanding that underpins the clinical and research roles of nuclear medicine practitioners. This article is the second in a series of articles that aims to enhance the understanding of pharmacological principles relevant to nuclear medicine. This article will build on the introductory concepts, terminology and principles of pharmacodynamics explored in the first article in the series. Specifically, this article will focus on the basic principles associated with pharmacokinetics. Article 3 will outline pharmacology relevant to pharmaceutical interventions and adjunctive medications employed in general nuclear medicine, the fourth pharmacology relevant to pharmaceutical interventions and adjunctive medications employed in nuclear cardiology, the fifth the pharmacology related to contrast media associated with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the final article will address drugs in the emergency trolley. 2 Introduction As previously outlined (1), pharmacology is the scientific study of the action and effects of drugs on living systems and the interaction of drugs with living systems (1-7). For general purposes, pharmacology is divided into pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics (Figure 1). The principle of pharmacokinetics is captured by philosophy of Paracelsus (medieval alchemist); “only the dose makes a thing not a poison” (1,8,9). -
The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.)
THE EUROPEAN DIRECTORATE FOR THE QUALITY OF MEDICINES & HEALTHCARE (EDQM) European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare • A Council of Europe Directorate, based on the Convention on the Elaboration of a European Pharmacopoeia (PA, 1964) • Mission: to contribute to a basic human right: access to good quality medicines and healthcare • See www.edqm.eu for further information 2 ©2020 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved. Key players for the quality of medicines in Europe National Authorities EU Coordination of scientific DG Health and resources from MS Food Safety Licensing Authorities Inspectorates Control Laboratories Pharmacopoeia Authorities Pharmaceutical legislation National Authorities EU & non-EU European Pharmacopoeia OMCL, Certification, Healthcare…. 3 ©2020 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved. •EDQM Laboratory •Established in 1967 •Located in Strasbourg, France • - Analytical Chemistry Division • - Biological Section 4 ©2020 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved. Role of the EDQM Laboratory European • establish/monitor Ph. Eur. reference substances (CRS) Pharmacopoeia • support elaboration of Ph. Eur. monographs / chapters (Ph. Eur.) • support the biological standardisation programme European • support the annual PTS programme OMCL network WHO • establish/monitor ICRS (Ref. Standards for the Ph. Int.) • establish/monitor ISA (Int’l Standards for Antibiotics) • participate in int’l studies on RS 5 ©2020 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved. European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standards for Biologicals Frank Jung, Ph.D. EDQM Laboratory Department Biological Section 6 ©2020 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved. The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) A compendium of quality standards for substances for pharmaceutical use and medicinal products Legally binding in 39 countries signatories of the Ph. -
Pharmacokinetic Models to Characterize the Absorption Phase and the Influence of a Proton Pump Inhibitor on the Overall Exposure of Dacomitinib
pharmaceutics Article Pharmacokinetic Models to Characterize the Absorption Phase and the Influence of a Proton Pump Inhibitor on the Overall Exposure of Dacomitinib Ana Ruiz-Garcia 1, Weiwei Tan 2, Jerry Li 2, May Haughey 2, Joanna Masters 2, Jennifer Hibma 2 and Swan Lin 2,* 1 Metrum Research Group, San Diego, CA 92121, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Pharmacometrics, Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA; weiwei.tan@pfizer.com (W.T.); jerry.li@pfizer.com (J.L.); may.haughey@pfizer.com (M.H.); joanna.c.masters@pfizer.com (J.M.); jennifer.e.hibma@pfizer.com (J.H.) * Correspondence: swan.lin@pfizer.com; Tel.: +1-(858)-622-7377 Received: 17 March 2020; Accepted: 3 April 2020; Published: 7 April 2020 Abstract: Introduction: Dacomitinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first line in patients with EGFR activating mutations. Dacomitinib is taken orally once daily at 45 mg with or without food, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Oncology patients often can develop gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which may require management with an acid-reducing agent. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as rabeprazole, inhibit sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (H+/K+-ATPase) pumps that stimulate acid secretion in the stomach and have a prolonged pharmacodynamic effect that extends beyond 24 h post-administration. The aim of this work was to characterize the absorption of dacomitinib via modeling with a particular interest in quantifying the impact of rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dacomitinib.