DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF UC Alumni Magazine VERSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF UC Alumni Magazine VERSION University College Alumni Magazine SPRING 2020 Portraiture IN THE AGE HONOURING SUPREME COURT OF INSTAGRAM JUSTICE ROSALIE ABELLA Robert Giard’s photographs of LGBTQ HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE OLYMPICS writers capture what’s essential INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVES IN EDUCATION Please save the date for the 2020 University College Alumni of Influence Awards Dinner and Gala Wednesday, November 18, 2020 The Carlu Reception 6:00 p.m. Dinner 7:00 p.m. Invitation and announcement of recipients to follow For more information or to submit a nomination for next year, please visit uc.utoronto.ca/nominations or call (416) 978-2968 Contributors Sharon Aschaiek Scott Rayter Kirk Sibbald Sharon Aschaiek is a communicator Scott Rayter is an assistant Kirk Sibbald works in and journalist who writes for and professor, teaching stream, in communications and lives in about the higher education sector in the English department, and Saskatoon with his wife and two Canada and beyond. She trained at former associate director of the daughters. He has a degree in York University, Humber College, Mark S. Bonham Centre for journalism from the University of and Ryerson University, and has Sexual Diversity Studies at UC. Western Ontario and, in his spare volunteered extensively for local He curated the exhibition Robert time, enjoys playing and watching a professional communications Giard: Towards the Particular at wide variety of sports. He also enjoys associations. Outside of work, she is a the Art Museum at the University travelling and hopes to make it back peace-and-love hippie with a dream of Toronto, and co-edited Queerly to Toronto in the near future to take of doing a meditation retreat at Zen Canadian: An Introductory Reader in some Blue Jays games. His fearless master Thich Nhat Hanh’s Plum in Sexuality Studies. prediction: the World Series returns Village Monastery in southern France. to Toronto in 2022! She is also known as a “corny mom,” according to her 13-year-old son. 4 UC ALUMNI MAGAZINE Features University College Alumni Magazine EDITOR Yvonne Palkowski (BA 2004 UC) SPECIAL THANKS Naomi Handley Emily Kakouris Lori MacIntyre Maheesha Ramessar Emily Sands 14 Markus Stock ART DIRECTION + DESIGN Amber Moon 10 PRINTING Andora Graphics COVER IMAGE Robert Giard, Five Members of “Other Countries,” March 1987, gelatin silver print, 40.6 x 50.8 cm. Gift of Jonathan Silin, 2012. University College Collection. Copyright Estate of Robert Giard. CORRESPONDENCE AND UNDELIVERABLE COPIES TO: University College Advancement Office 15 King’s College Circle Toronto ON, Canada M5S 3H7 University College Alumni Magazine 18 is published twice a year by the University College Advancement Office and is circulated to 27,000 alumni and friends of University 10 Tracking Human Rights College, University of Toronto. in Sport To update your address or Olympian and scholar unsubscribe, send an email to Bruce Kidd has his eye on this [email protected] summer’s Games in Tokyo 24 with your name and address, or call (416) 978-2139 or toll-free 14 Supreme Court Justice 1 (800) 463-6048. Rosalie Abella Judge, scholar, public servant, PUBLICATIONS MAIL AGREEMENT humanitarian 40041311 Departments 18 Towards the Particular In the age of Instagram, Robert Giard’s portraits of LGBTQ writers capture what’s essential 06 Principal’s Message 24 Integrating Indigenous 08 Calendar Perspectives into Higher 28 Class Notes Education 32 Nota Bene How community engagement leads to richer learning 38 In Memoriam SPRING 2020 5 Principal Markus Stock delivers his installation address. Photograph by Sean Story. The following is an WE OFTEN END BY GIVING THANKS to people around us, but I would like to begin by thanking Rory Sinclair, our piper, for edited version of the the impressive introductory performance. The tune took me back address given by to a time in my life that was both formative and without which I wouldn’t be here in Canada now: my year abroad at the University of Professor Markus Stock on Edinburgh in Scotland. the occasion of his installation To this day, I remember the moment almost 30 years ago, when I stepped out of Waverley Station, looked at the stunning Castle Hill, and as University College’s 17th heard a bagpipe play, as I would often in the year ahead. For sure, this was cliché-laden and tourist-geared folklore, but who cares? I certainly principal on February 5, 2020. didn’t care. I was happy, and thought: this city, mine, for a year! 6 UC ALUMNI MAGAZINE PRINCIPAL’S MESSAGE My university experience there was rewarding. I alumni, students, staff, and faculty—engaged. We found friends for life in the International House, will be mindful of our carbon footprint. And we will in a drama group, and in my dorm. I also found continue to build bridges within the institution, with joy in helping others improve their German. Most our brother and sister Colleges, the Departments, the importantly, I was able to see this as the biggest Faculty of Arts and Science, and beyond. adventure of my life at this point. University College’s values of inclusivity, equity, and At the time, it was also exhilarating to me that I was diversity also require care and wakefulness. I will rely able to master my year abroad in a foreign language on everyone in the UC community, such a strong and and in a foreign culture. I stepped out of Waverley connected community, to defend these values with Station alone, and 10 months later left Edinburgh me against all sorts of dangers arising around them in with a network of friends and much clearer ideas this societal and cultural moment. about my academic aspirations. It was a life-wide learning experience, not just an academic one. And of University College is a special place, and its iconicity course, my joy also came from the fact that I felt I had extends to: its physical appearance as a National mastered this all on my own. Historic Site of Canada; its location at the centre of campus, as an oasis within a metropolitan area; and In hindsight, though, I realize that this extremely enriching experience had been carefully curated by its values, the College being an icon of diversity and the sending and receiving institutions, by institutional inclusion in keeping with the city and the country of priorities on international experience and intercultural which it has been such a vital and important part. fluency, and by a thoughtful way to care for This iconicity in all of its aspects—in the bricks of the international students in the classroom and beyond. buildings, in UC’s locational interconnectedness, and This enabled me, but in beautifully subtle ways that in its values—requires constant care. It needs to be I took for granted. I now realize that student success earned anew day-in and day-out. I know that it is this requires immense institutional thoughtfulness to responsibility that comes with the principal’s gown, couple a culture of academic excellence with a culture and I am willing to take it on collaboratively, relying of caring, just as the recent Task Force on Student on all of you who are old and new hands at forming Mental Health put it. and transforming this iconicity. Thank you. And this, let me add, is not only a matter of care for I would also like to thank my family, Marje, Mathilda, students struggling with mental health problems; and Anton, who have given their okay to share me with I care deeply about this issue and Colleges have a this job for the next four and a half years, and who have decisive role to play. It is also a matter of subtle care kept me happy and joyful in my life beyond academia. for the happiness and well-being of all our students. Let’s care! But let me close not on bricks and buildings, but on what lies underneath. As John Borrows (who As someone studying medieval cultures, I am well delivered the Priestley Lectures at UC a few years aware of the vestimentary symbolism of the robing ago) reminds us in his recent book, Law’s Indigenous ceremony that just happened. I am honoured, Ethics, Taddle Creek, which once ran right through burdened, and exhilarated, now that this old-new campus, is now sadly buried underground. It was a gown is on my shoulders. Ceremony has placed gathering place and remains a source of significance helping hands and encouraging words around me. for Indigenous peoples historically and to the present Thank you all for these, I am very grateful. day. There is iconicity, uncomfortable iconicity, in this Students, professorial colleagues, alumni, staff: you locational fact as well. have sent your representatives to help me into this role. I understand and will do all I can to live up to We need to remember that this is the land on which your gesture of immense trust and great expectation. we operate, face the truths around that, and do all The UC community has been amazingly welcoming we can to continue to include Indigenous teachings, and supportive! It is such a joy to work with this learners, and scholars in our midst. After all, as community, to collaboratively make strategic decisions Borrows says, “the river still cleanses this area” to foster cultures of care intertwined with cultures of and “its ancient powers continue[.] to flow despite academic excellence in the College and beyond. attempts to submerge its force.” Now that the UC revitalization is almost complete, With this, I am at the end of my speech. For me, this we will work to put our beautiful, new spaces to moment is like stepping out of Waverley Station on best use for curated, and not-so-curated, student that afternoon many years ago.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CCCC Attended Supreme Court of Canada Hearing on the Aga Case
    Table of Contents • CCCC attended Supreme Court of Canada hearing on the Aga case CCCC attended Supreme Court of Canada hearing on the Aga case Analysis of current issues involving law, religion, and society, led by Barry W. Bussey, Director of Legal Affairs. By Barry W. Bussey CCCC (09.12.2020) - https://bit.ly/3nlGTQl - CCCC’s Director of Legal Affairs, Barry W. Bussey, represented the CCCC at the Supreme Court of Canada’s virtual hearing today (Dec 9) in the case of Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral, et al. v. Teshome Aga, (39094). CCCC was granted the opportunity to intervene in the case, and to file a brief, but was not given time for oral argument. Brief fact summary Several members of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church St. Mary Cathedral were on a committee that investigated a movement within the congregation. The committee reported to Archbishop Dimetros that the movement was heretical. The committee recommended action, including purging of heretics. When Archbishop Dimetros did not follow their recommendations, the committee members were robust in their opposition – to the point that they were warned of church discipline. Finally, they were suspended from membership. In response, they then sued in court. The church in return asked for summary judgment to dismiss the lawsuit. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice agreed with the church and dismissed the disgruntled members’ lawsuit, noting that the courts have no jurisdiction to hear such cases. However, the members appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal stated that courts could hear the case because there was a contract between the members and the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Carissima Mathen*
    C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. the Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust by Max Beer
    Curr Psychol DOI 10.1007/s12144-007-9017-3 The Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust Max Beer # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract In 1993 Hitler and the Nazi party came to power in Germany. At the same time, in Canada in general and in Montreal in particular, anti-Semitism was becoming more widespread. The Canadian Jewish Congress, as a result of the growing tension in Europe and the increase in anti-Semitism at home, was reborn in 1934 and became the authoritative voice of Canadian Jewry. During World War II the Nazis embarked on a campaign that resulted in the systematic extermination of millions of Jews. This article focuses on the Montreal Jewish community, its leadership, and their response to the fate of European Jewry. The study pays particular attention to the Canadian Jewish Congress which influenced the outlook of the community and its subsequent actions. As the war progressed, loyalty to Canada and support for the war effort became the overriding issues for the community and the leadership and concern for their European brethren faded into the background. Keywords Anti-Semitism . Holocaust . Montreal . Quebec . Canada . Bronfman . Uptowners . Downtowners . Congress . Caiserman The 1930s, with the devastating worldwide economic depression and the emergence of Nazism in Germany, set the stage for a war that would result in tens of millions of deaths and the mass extermination of Europe’s Jews. The decade marked a complete stoppage of Jewish immigration to Canada, an increase in anti-Semitism on the North American continent, and the revival of the Canadian Jewish Congress as the voice for the Canadian Jewish community.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Selling Nazi T-Shirts – Copy
    )''/ <J *,' >F EFIK?N<JK KF;8P% Salute to Israel on its 60th Anniversary. C<8J< 8GI C<8J< =FI N<CC <HL@GG<; 8K ! G<I DFEK? *%0 *+/ LG KF +/ DFJ% *0#0'' ;FNE G8PD<EK/#//* 8;ALJK<;8DFLEK*''' Efik_n\jk C\olj n\cZfd\j D`Z_X\c >fc[Y\i^ kf k_\ k\Xd )''/<J*,'*%,C).)_gM-<e^`e\-$jg\\[Jlg\i<c\Zkife`$ 0', +0+$(''' ZXccp :fekifcc\[ KiXejd`jj`fe M\_`Zc\JkXY`c`kp :fekifc KiXZk`fe :fekXZk1 D`Z_X\c >fc[Y\i^ :\cc1 +(- -(.$+)+* nnn%efik_n\jkc\olj%Zfd :fekifc / X`iYX^j Gfn\i X[aljkXYc\ _\Xk\[ c\Xk_\i ]ifek j\Xkj >\e\iXc JXc\j DXeX^\i <dX`c1 d^fc[Y\i^7efik_n\jkc\olj%Zfd DJIG _Xj Y\\e i\[lZ\[ Yp *''' Xe[ `j efn *0#0'' ]fi X e\n C\olj )''/ <J *,'% (#./' ]i\`^_k&G;@# kXo\j# c`Z\ej\# i\^`jkiXk`fe Xe[ `ejliXeZ\ Xi\ \okiX% !C\Xj\ Xe[ ÔeXeZ\ f]]\ij gifm`[\[ k_ifl^_ C\olj =`eXeZ`Xc J\im`Z\j# fe Xggifm\[ Zi\[`k% C\Xj\ \oXdgc\ YXj\[ fe X +/ dfek_ k\id Xk *%0 8GI% Dfek_cp gXpd\ek `j *+/ n`k_ ))/' Hl\\e Jki\\k <Xjk# 9iXdgkfe# FE /#//* [fne gXpd\ek fi \hl`mXc\ek kiX[\ `e# (#./' ]i\`^_k&G;@# ' j\Zli`kp [\gfj`k Xe[ Ôijk dfek_cp gXpd\ek [l\ Xk c\Xj\ `eZ\gk`fe% KXo\j# c`Z\ej\# i\^`jkiXk`fe Xe[ `ejliXeZ\ Xi\ \okiX% -'#''' b`cfd\ki\ XccfnXeZ\2 Z_Xi^\ f] '%)'&bd ]fi \oZ\jj b`cfd\ki\j% Jfd\ Zfe[`k`fej&i\jki`Zk`fej Xggcp%j\ j\\ pfli C\olj [\Xc\i ]fi Zfdgc\k\ [\kX`cj% May 8, 2008 / Iyyar 3, 5768 Publication Mail Agreement #40011766 STEELES MEMORIAL CHAPEL Your Community Chapel since 1927 Congratulations to the S tate of Israel 905-881-6003 Circulation 62,530 Largest Jewish Weekly in Canada www.steeles.org TRIBUNE CALL GETS ‘HITLER’ T-SHIRTS OFF WEB By Wendy B.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arran
    ■ Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present Click here to download Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 1: 1797 to 1941 For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name gender year and place of birth, and year of death where applicable year called to the bar in Ontario (and/or, until 1889, the year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. name of diverse community or heritage biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography (note: living lawyers provided or edited and approved their own biographies including the names of their community or heritage) suggestions for further reading, and photo where available. The biographies are ordered chronologically, by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. To reach a particular period, click on the following links: 1941-1950, 1951-1960, 1961-1970, 1971-1980, 1981-1990, 1991-2000, 2001-. To download the biographies of lawyers called to the bar before 1941, please click Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present For more information on the project, including the set of biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality I
    Gender EqualityI.,. ,!Sa*=fl q J$ * ."" &,j & ;"<$$p "" !:A"- %* BY MICHELLE FALARDEAU-RAMSAY, Q.C, Pour montrer I'Pvolution des droits a I'PgalitP, lkuteure the future." In the early years of Confederation, women utilise, h commencer par les '5fameuses"du cas Personne en faced severe discrimination under the law and were sys- 1929, la tradition chez les Canadiennes, de se seruir du tematically excluded from the judicial system. Certain systi.me judiciaire incluant les tribunaux administratifj. criminal laws, such as infanticide, applied only to women, and different punishments for crimes were meted out When I graduated from law school in the late '50s, I was depending on the sex of the offender. Family law, under one of only six women in a class of 200. I was asked at the both civil law in Quebec and common law in other parts time, on more than one occasion, whether I was studying. - of Canada, treated women entirely as dependents. For law because I wanted to marry a lawyer, a question that example, a husband's permission was necessary for a wife would be inconceivable today. The first time I appeared in to engage in business, or even to administer or sell prop- court on behalf of a client, I was asked by a colleague erty which she had owned before marriage. whether I would cry if I lost the case. And I remember one Nor could women have any influence over the laws that occasion in the Montreal courthouse when three male affected them. Women could not vote or hold public colleagues stood guard while I used the men's washroom, office, and it was not until 1897 that the first woman- because it had not occurred to anyone to put aladies' room Clara Brett Martin-was admitted to the Bar of a Cana- in the area reserved for lawyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Precedent Unbound? Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada
    The Peter A. Allard School of Law Allard Research Commons Faculty Publications Allard Faculty Publications 2007 Precedent Unbound? Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada Debra Parkes Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/fac_pubs Part of the Courts Commons Citation Details Debra Parkes, "Precedent Unbound? Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada" ([forthcoming in 2007]) 32:1 Man LJ 135. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Allard Faculty Publications at Allard Research Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Allard Research Commons. Page 1 TITLE: Precedent Unbound? Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada AUTHOR: Debra Parkes SOURCE: Manitoba Law Journal CITED: (2007) 32 Man. L.J. 135 - 162 1 Stare decisis is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase stare decisis et non quieta movere, and may be translated as "to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled matters."1 In Gulliver's Travels, the English satirist Johnathan Swift had Gulliver say: It is a maxim among these lawyers, that whatever hath been done before, may le- gally be done again: and therefore they take special care to record all the deci- sions formerly made against common justice and the general reason of mankind. These under the name of precedents, they produce as authorities, to justify the most iniquitous opinions; and the judges never fail of decreeing accordingly.2 While the notion that Canadian appellate judges slavishly adhere to outdated precedent in a manner contrary to "common justice and the general re ason of mankind" does not accurately describe the current reality, there remains a lively and important debate about the functions, values and limits of "abiding by things decided" in common law systems.3 In this vein, Justices Steel and Freedman in the recent R.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’
    Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 4, n. 4 (2014) – Law in the Age of Media Logic ISSN: 2079-5971 Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’ ∗ DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN Schneiderman, D., 2014. Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 4 (4), 685-708. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2511239 Abstract Most of the recent appointees to the Supreme Court of Canada have participated in a new Canadian judicial nomination process initiated by the current Conservative government. As originally formulated in early policy platforms, the process was intended to mimic features of US Senate judicial confirmation hearings and so would highlight the distinction (popular in US political discourse) between ‘applying’ and ‘making’ law. This led to widespread fears that any new public process would politicize judicial appointments and functions at the Supreme Court. The process turned out to be much more tepid than anticipated and so raises questions about what Canadians may have learned as a consequence of this new nomination process. This paper undertakes a qualitative analysis of reporting of four nomination processes from a select number of Canadian newspapers. The main object is to determine the degree to which readers might have been alerted to the distinction between law and politics or, put another way, between judicial activism and restraint. It turns out that this framing was not dominant in the coverage and that, instead, distinctive Canadian political preoccupations, like language politics, got channeled through this new political opportunity structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, April 27 Tuesday, April 28
    The Berkeley Institute for Jewish Law and Israel Studies and the Center for Jewish Studies, UC Berkeley present Monday, April 27 at The Magnes Collection of Jewish Art and Life 5:30 PM Reception 6:15 - 7:00 PM Film Screening – Nuremberg: Its Lesson for Today 7:00 - 8:00 PM Q & A with SANDRA SCHULBERG, filmmaker and producer, RICHARD BUXBAUM, Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law, SAIRA MOHAMED, Asst. Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tuesday, April 28 at the Bancroft Hotel 8:30 AM Breakfast 9:00 AM Welcome KENNETH BaMBERGER, Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law; Director, Institute for Jewish Law and Israel Studies; and John Efron, Koret Professor of history, UC Berkeley 9:15AM -10:45 AM Panel I – Nuremberg as Legal and Historical Precedent MODERATOR ANDREA SINN, the DAAD-Professor for German history, UC Berkeley SPEAKERS MICHAEL MARRUS, Senior fellow of Massey College and the Chancellor rose and ray Wolfe Professor Emeritus of holocaust Studies, University of Toronto Nuremberg’s Forgotten Origins: International Humanitarian Law MICHAEL BaZYLER, Professor of Law, fowler School of Law, Chapman University, 1939 Society Law Scholar in holocaust and human rights Studies The Nuremberg Trials and the Birth of Modern International Law 10:45 AM Coffee Break 11:00 AM – 1:00 pM Panel II – Where Were the Jews at Nuremberg?: Rethinking the Roles of Victims and Perpetrators in Trials of the Holocaust MODERATOR John Efron,
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective on the Abella Commission and Employment Equity
    25 Years After: A Retrospective on the Abella Commission and Employment Equity Stuck in the Mud: Why Canada Can't Deal With Systemic Discrimination Against Women Shelagh Day Carleton University May 2009 The thesis of this talk is that whether we achieve equality for women turns on whether governments agree that they have a positive role to play as a redistributor of opportunities and resources. During the last 50 years we have witnessed first a solid acknowledgement of the significance of government’s role in creating equality in Canadian society through laws and programs, and then a repudiation of that role, a turn towards an Americanized view that government is always bad, and government intervention in so-called private sphere of the market and the family to correct discrimination is, by definition, abusive. There are many articulations of this latter position, but a recent one is Thomas Flanagan’s op ed piece in the last week’s Globe and Mail. Flanagan says that the very existence of human rights commissions is an abuse. They enforce anti-discrimination laws, not real rights like freedom of speech and worship and ownership of property. And the market should be allowed to take care of discrimination without government interference. Discrimination undermines competition, since it reduces the available pool of talent, and although competitive markets may not immediately abolish discriminatory practices, they tend to erode them over time by making discrimination unprofitable. For the proposition that the market will – over time – take care of discrimination on its own, Mr. Flanagan offers no evidence. Nor does he offer any explanation for why, if markets are self-correcting, this late in human history, discrimination has not yet disappeared.
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Community
    VOLUME 3, #2 FEBRUARY 2016 In Our Community FROM CHAIR STEVEN SHAFIR dmonton’s Local Partner Cabinet The LPC, in con- E(LPC) of the Centre for Israel and junction with Jewish Jewish Affairs is the Advocacy Committee communities across of the Jewish Federation of Edmonton. the country, has The committee has not met frequently been bringing the over the past year, but has taken on issue of genetic dis- some very important tasks on behalf of crimination to the the Jewish community. The LPC was governments of each very busy this year in welcoming both of the provinces as the new Federal and Provincial govern- well as the Federal ments. We met, on behalf of both CIJA Government. It is and the Jewish Federation of Edmonton, our hope that we can Community Relations Chair Steve Shafir with politicians. with various government representatives move forward togeth- and introduced them to the community. er with Alberta’s government to intro- tion forward. We helped co-ordinate a wine and cheese duce legislation prohibiting insurance In addition to everything set out above, with the new Provincial Government in companies from discriminating against the LPC has been active in responding to co-ordination with the Calgary Jewish individuals on the basis of their genetics. anti-Israel sentiment in local media. We Federation, CIJA National and CJPAC. It To this extent, the committee has met have been very lucky over the past year was well attended by both government with members of various ministries and in that there has been very little activity and opposition MLAs.
    [Show full text]