DOCSLIB.ORG

Magnetite Forrnation by the Reduction of Hematite with Iron Under Hydrothermal Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magnetite Forrnation by the Reduction of Hematite with Iron Under Hydrothermal Conditions American Mineralogist, Volume6l pages927-932, 1976 Magnetiteforrnation by thereduction of hematitewith iron underhydrothermal conditions Ar-lN Mnrrnnws Departmentof Geology,Hebrew Uniuersity Jerusalem,Israel Abstract The formation of magnetiteby the reductionof hematitewith iron in the presenceof aqueoussolution at 350-570"C, 1-2 kbar pressure,takes placeby two reactions:(l) the oxidation of iron metal with water, and (2) the reductionof hematitewith hydrogen.The overall oxidation-reductionreaction is acceleratedby increasedtemperature, pressure, and solutionacidity. The oxidation of iron occursby a replacementand armoring mechanism, whereashematite reduction occurs by reductivedissolution of hematiteand direct precipi- tation of magnetitefrom the bulk solution.The initial rapid rate of the hematitereduction may renderunreliable an oxygenisotope geothermometer calibrated using the reaction. Introduction gen with compact stacking are parallel for both havinglittle or no The reductionof hematiteto magnetiteat elevated phases,with iron atomsapparently temperaturesand pressuresin the presenceof water effecton relativeorientations. presentobservations can be representedby the equation: The purposeof this note is to on the mechanismsof magnetiteformation by the 3 FerO, * H, = 2 FesOo+ HrO (l) reductionof hematitewith iron under hydrothermal kbar pressure,and to Magnetitecan alsobe formedat high temperaturesin conditionsat 350'-570oC,l-2 mechanisms the presenceof water by the reduction of hematite indicatepossible consequences of these geothermome- with iron metal.The reactioncan be expressedby the for a magnetite-wateroxygen isotope (Bertenrath The iron- equation: ter calibration et al., 1973). magnetite-wustitetriple point is at 575oC(Huebner, Fe*4FerOr=3FerOn (2) l97l), and the experimentalupper temperature limit was chosen so as to eliminate the possibility of (l Little is knownabout the mechanisms of reactions ) wustiteformation. and (2) under hydrothermalconditions. However, severalstudies have beenmade on the reductionof Experimentalmethods and observations hematiteat or nearone atmospherepressure, using a varietyof reducingconditions: CO / CO H 2,H 2/H*O, The solid reactantswere weighed out accordingto and FelHzO(McKewen, 1960; Kawaski ", et al.,1962; the stoichiometryof equation(2). The solidsused Endomet al., 1964;Heizmann and Baro, 1966;Nabi were:iron (metal)powder (Fisons Ltd.); iron metal and Lu, 1968;Hara et al., 1969).These studies have shavings,approximately 1mm long (BritishChemical shown that magnetiteinitially forms as a surface StandardsNo. 26013)and iron (III) oxide> 99.995 layer on the hematitereactant, and then gradually percent(Koch Light Ltd.). Solutionswere either wa- replacesthe hematite.The kinetics of reaction are ter or dilute hydrochloricacid. Experimentalcharges controlled by diffusion of gasesto and from the consistedof 50-60 mg solid and 800-1000mg solu- hematite-magnetiteinterface, through the coating tion sealedinside 0.006" thick walled gold capsules. magnetitelayer. Topotaxic influences on the mecha- All experimentswere performed inside stainless steel nism of the reductionof singlecrystal hematite have cold-sealbombs, using water as the pressuremedium. also been determined(Heizmann and Baro, 1966; Reactionproducts were examinedby X-ray powder Moineauand Baro, 1967;Baro and Heizmann,1969; diffraction using iron filtered CoKa radiation. This Moineauand Baro, l97l). The epitaxialrelationship method could not satisfactorily detect the small betweenthe two mineralsis suchthat planesof oxy- amountsof iron in products,but visualexamination 927 928 ALAN MATTHEI4/S with a moderate-powerbinocular microscopesuf- Tlsrs l. Experimentalresults ficedfor this purpose.The molar proportionsof mag- netite to hematitewere estimatedfrom the relative Toc t.hrs P.kbSolid Soluti ons Products Yiel d reactant s % intensitiesof the magnetite3ll reflectionsand the hematite 355 166 I Fe shavings 0.01M.HCl Magnetite 104reflections. For this purposea calibra- Hematite Hematite tion curvewas prepared by X-ray diffractionof mix- Iron 355 166 I " " 0.00lM. HC l Magnetite tures containing known amounts of magnetiteand Hematite hematite. Iron Scanning electron microscopy was em- 360 97 I Fe powder 0.01M.HCI Magnetite ployed in determining the nature of the reaction Hematite Hematite Iron mechanisms. 360 5i0 I " " Magnetite Experimentalresults are summarized,in Table l Hemati te '1""0.00lM.HClMagnetite Iron The estimatesof magnetite/hematite proportions are 360 510 Hematite givenas percentmagnetite yield, as deierminedfrom I ron ' the stoichiometryof equation(2). Temperaturesare 365 455 2 " Magnetite Iron (s)* ' quoted +5oC, pressurea200 bars; and the stated 360 0.25 2 " Water Magnetite reaction Hematite timesare from whenthe bombsequilibrated Iron at temperature(run-up timeswere approximately 45 355 455 2 ' Maqnetite (s) 'I Ir6n min.).The followingobservations can be madewith JOU O3U " Magnetite 75 respectto the data presentedin (l) Hematite the table. The I ron reactionof iron powder with hematiteis accelerated 365 1940 I .5 " ltlaonetite 100 by increasingtemperature, pressure and solution 465 t',l6 Fe shavings llater llagnetite 65 acidity. (2) Extensivemagnetite formation (>60Vo) Hematite Hematite Iron occurs in reactionsof short duration (0.25-0.5 460 48 Fe powder 0.0lM.HCl Magnetite 100 hours).Iron metalconstitutes only I I percentof the Hematite 'l00 450 136 0.00lM.HCl Magnetite '100 total iron of the reactants,thus the bulk of the high 4ss 358 0.0001M.HCIMagnetite 460 0.5 Fe powder l,later Magnetite 60 magnetiteyields must come from the reduction of Hematite lilitt* hematite.Additionally, Matthews(1974) has shown 450 48 ,, Magneti te that only slightoxidation of iron metalpowder (< Hemati te Iron 207o)occurs under similarexperimental conditions. 455 358 Magnetite Substantialmagnetite Iron (s) formation must occur during 455 515 Magnetite the run-upperiod. lr0n (s,l In the reactionsin which iron metal shavingsand 555 166 Fe shavings l.later Magnetite hematitewere the solid reactants,the HenEtite Iron shavingscould 545 0.5 Fe powder Water Magneti te be recoveredfrom the experimentalproducts, coated Hematite Hematite with a surfacelayer of magnetite,but otherwiseun- Iron 570 267 l'4agnetite '100100 reacted.The productsremaining after the extraction 540 357 Magnetite 30f, cJ{ Magnetjte 100 of the iron shavingscontained both magnetiteand hematiteat 350oand 465C, but at 555"Conly mag- netite was detectable.Similar observationswere *(s) indjcates that only traces of iron are present in the reaction Droduct. madein severalexperiments in which iron powder was reactedwith hematite;whereas all hematitehad undergoneconversion to magnetite,traces of un- Magnetite crystallizesin the isometricsystem, and reactediron remainedin the product. most commonlyshows octahedral and dodecahedral SEM micrographsillustrating the mechanismsin- form. Thesehabits can be recognizedin someof the volved in the iron-hematite reaction are given in idiomorphiccrystals shown in Figure2. FiguresI and2. Two distinctgenerations of magnet- ite crystals can be observed:(a) irregular, tightly Discussion packed, magnetite crystals, surrounding the iron The experimentalobservations indicate that mag- metalgrains (Fig. I ), (b) well formed,loosely packed, netite formation proceeds non-stoichiometrically. magnetitecrystals, often revealingextremely well de- Reductionof hematiteto magnetiteoccurs more rap- velopedcrystalline habits (Fig. 2). No obviousorien- idly than the oxidation of iron. Completereaction is tatedrelationships exist between the type (b) crystals. achievedin conditionsof enhancedT. P. and solution MAGNETITE FORMATION UNDER HY DROTHERMAL CONDITIONS 929 system.Eugster and Wones(1962) note that the ef- fectsof hydrogendiffusion from a pressuremedium bufferedby bomb walls are only noticeableat tem- peraturesgreater than 700oC.Specifically, Huebner (1971)states that thehematite-magnetitefOr) buffer is stablefor 2-3 daysat 750"C.At the lower temper- aturesof this study,hydrogen diffusion rates must be significantlyslower than at 700oC,particularly so sincereasonably thick-walled gold tubing was used. The non-stoichiometryis evidentat all temperatures in runsof only0.5 hours duration; this clearly cannot be a consequenceof hydrogen diffusion from the pressuremedium. It is reasonableto concludethat hydrogendiffusion through capsulewalls is of sec- ondary influenceon experimentalphenomena. Matthews (1974) found that increasingtemper- ature and solution acidity acceleratedthe oxidation of iron metal.Consequently, the rate of generationof hydrogenby the oxidation reactionwill also be in- creasedby higher temperatureand solution acidity. iron metal grain. Ftc. l. Magnetitecrystals surrounding an (1960) found that the rate of hematite Product from reactionof iron with hematitein water after 0.5 McKewen hoursat 545oC. reductionin hydrogen-watervapor mixturesat I at- mosphereis proportionalto the partial pressureof hydrogen.Thus, the rate-enhancingeffects oftemper- acidity. This independence in the chemical behavior ature and solutionacidity on the iron-hematitereac- of the two solid reactants,together with the SEM tion could have a dual origin. The productionof observations,suggests that two reactionsare occur- magnetitefrom the oxidationof iron is increased,but ring: also,because of the correspondingincrease inl(Hr), Oxidationof iron metalwith water 3 Fe + 4 HrO= Fe'On* 4 Hz (3) Reductionof hematitewith hydrogen 3 FerO, * H, =i 2 FerOr + HrO (l) In oxidation-reductionterms,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Efficient Improvement of Original Magnetite in Iron Ore Reduction
    minerals Article The Efficient Improvement of Original Magnetite in Iron Ore Reduction Reaction in Magnetization Roasting Process and Mechanism Analysis by In Situ and Continuous Image Capture Bing Zhao 1,2, Peng Gao 1,2,*, Zhidong Tang 1,2 and Wuzhi Zhang 1,2 1 School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China; [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (Z.T.); [email protected] (W.Z.) 2 National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of High-Efficient Exploitation Technology for Refractory Iron Ore Resources, Shenyang 110819, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-024-8368-8920 Abstract: Magnetization roasting followed by magnetic separation is considered an effective method for recovering iron minerals. As hematite and magnetite are the main concomitant constituents in iron ores, the separation index after the magnetization roasting will be more optimized than with only hematite. In this research, the mechanism of the original magnetite improving iron ore reduction during the magnetization roasting process was explored using ore fines and lump ore samples. Under optimum roasting conditions, the iron grade increased from 62.17% to 65.22%, and iron recovery increased from 84.02% to 92.02% after separation, when Fe in the original magnetite content increased from 0.31% to 8.09%, although the Fe masses in each sample were equal. For lump ores with magnetite and hematite intergrowth, the method of in situ and continuous image capture Citation: Zhao, B.; Gao, P.; Tang, Z.; for microcrack generation and the evolution of the magnetization roasting process was innovatively Zhang, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Magnetite-Hematite Concentrate from Iron Ore Tailings
    E3S Web of Conferences 247, 01042 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124701042 ICEPP-2021 Recovery of magnetite-hematite concentrate from iron ore tailings Mikhail Khokhulya1,*, Alexander Fomin1, and Svetlana Alekseeva1 1Mining Institute of Kola Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, 184209, Russia Abstract. The research is aimed at study of the probable recovery of iron from the tailings of the Olcon mining company located in the north-western Arctic zone of Russia. Material composition of a sample from a tailings dump was analysed. The authors have developed a separation production technology to recover magnetite-hematite concentrate from the tailings. A processing flowsheet includes magnetic separation, milling and gravity concentration methods. The separation technology provides for production of iron ore concentrate with total iron content of 65.9% and recovers 91.0% of magnetite and 80.5% of hematite from the tailings containing 20.4% of total iron. The proposed technology will increase production of the concentrate at a dressing plant and reduce environmental impact. 1 Introduction The mineral processing plant of the Olcon JSC, located at the Murmansk region, produces magnetite- At present, there is an important problem worldwide in hematite concentrate. The processing technology the disposal of waste generated during the mineral includes several magnetic separation stages to produce production and processing. Tailings dumps occupy huge magnetite concentrate and two jigging stages to produce areas and pollute the environment. However, waste hematite concentrate from a non-magnetic fraction of material contains some valuable components that can be magnetic separation [13]. used in various industries. In the initial period of plant operation (since 1955) In Russia, mining-induced waste occupies more than iron ore tailings were stored in the Southern Bay of 300 thousand hectares of lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Iron Formations
    Banded Iron Formations Cover Slide 1 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures Kalmina gorge banded iron (Gypsy Denise 2013, Creative Commons) BIFs were deposited in shallow marine troughs or basins. Deposits are tens of km long, several km wide and 150 – 600 m thick. Photo is of Kalmina gorge in the Pilbara (Karijini National Park, Hamersley Ranges) 2 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures • Bands of iron rich and iron poor rock Iron rich bands: hematite (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), siderite (FeCO3) or pyrite (FeS2). Iron poor bands: chert (fine‐grained quartz) and low iron oxide levels Rock sample from a BIF (Woudloper 2009, Creative Commons 1.0) Iron rich bands are composed of hematitie (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), siderite (FeCO3) or pyrite (FeS2). The iron poor bands contain chert (fine‐grained quartz) with lesser amounts of iron oxide. 3 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures • Bands of iron rich and iron poor rock • Archaean and Proterozoic in age BIF formation through time (KG Budge 2020, public domain) BIFs were deposited for 2 billion years during the Archaean and Proterozoic. There was another short time of deposition during a Snowball Earth event. 4 Why are BIFs important? • Iron ore exports are Australia’s top earner, worth $61 billion in 2017‐2018 • Iron ore comes from enriched BIF deposits Rio Tinto iron ore shiploader in the Pilbara (C Hargrave, CSIRO Science Image) Australia is consistently the leading iron ore exporter in the world. We have large deposits where the iron‐poor chert bands have been leached away, leaving 40%‐60% iron.
    [Show full text]
  • CARBONATE and MAGNETITE PARAGENESES AS MONITORS of CARBON DIOXIDE and OXYGEN FUGACITY Andrea M
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI 1424.pdf CARBONATE AND MAGNETITE PARAGENESES AS MONITORS OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND OXYGEN FUGACITY Andrea M. Koziol, Department of Geology, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-2364 USA; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction: A geologist or meteoriticist magnetite grains, led Brearley to suggest that a may have before them an assemblage of miner- later reheating event caused the carbonate to als that together record a history of the tem- decompose. The CO2 evolved would produce perature, pressure, and fluid composition that the small voids. The siderite component of the the rock has experienced. Certain key minerals carbonate would preferentially break down, do record water, CO2, and O2 fugacities. forming magnetite [5]. Siderite, FeCO3, is one of those key miner- als. The stable coexistence of siderite with an- Alternatively, an increase in oxygen fugac- other key mineral, such as graphite or magnet- ity would promote magnetite formation by ite (Fe3O4), is only possible under certain re- strictive conditions. If other variables are 3 FeCO3 + 1/2 (O2) = Fe3O4 + 3 CO2. (1) known, the activity or fugacity of CO2 or O2 in the fluid phase once present in the rock can Oxygen fugacity could change as pore fluid often be estimated. This is an oxybarometer: a changes, or as certain mineral reactions pro- way of estimating oxygen fugacity (fO2) from gress. The oxygen may not be present in a gas mineral assemblages. The results can be used to phase, but may be dissolved in a fluid or supplied understand parageneses of iron-rich carbonate by a mineral.
    [Show full text]
  • Porphyry Deposits
    PORPHYRY DEPOSITS W.D. SINCLAIR Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0E8 E-mail: [email protected] Definition Au (±Ag, Cu, Mo) Mo (±W, Sn) Porphyry deposits are large, low- to medium-grade W-Mo (±Bi, Sn) deposits in which primary (hypogene) ore minerals are dom- Sn (±W, Mo, Ag, Bi, Cu, Zn, In) inantly structurally controlled and which are spatially and Sn-Ag (±W, Cu, Zn, Mo, Bi) genetically related to felsic to intermediate porphyritic intru- Ag (±Au, Zn, Pb) sions (Kirkham, 1972). The large size and structural control (e.g., veins, vein sets, stockworks, fractures, 'crackled zones' For deposits with currently subeconomic grades and and breccia pipes) serve to distinguish porphyry deposits tonnages, subtypes are based on probable coproduct and from a variety of deposits that may be peripherally associat- byproduct metals, assuming that the deposits were econom- ed, including skarns, high-temperature mantos, breccia ic. pipes, peripheral mesothermal veins, and epithermal pre- Geographical Distribution cious-metal deposits. Secondary minerals may be developed in supergene-enriched zones in porphyry Cu deposits by weathering of primary sulphides. Such zones typically have Porphyry deposits occur throughout the world in a series significantly higher Cu grades, thereby enhancing the poten- of extensive, relatively narrow, linear metallogenic tial for economic exploitation. provinces (Fig. 1). They are predominantly associated with The following subtypes of porphyry deposits are Mesozoic to Cenozoic orogenic belts in western North and defined according to the metals that are essential to the eco- South America and around the western margin of the Pacific nomics of the deposit (metals that are byproducts or poten- Basin, particularly within the South East Asian Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock and Mineral Identification for Engineers
    Rock and Mineral Identification for Engineers November 1991 r~ u.s. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration acid bottle 8 granite ~~_k_nife _) v / muscovite 8 magnify~in_g . lens~ 0 09<2) Some common rocks, minerals, and identification aids (see text). Rock And Mineral Identification for Engineers TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................ 1 Minerals ...................................................................................... 2 Rocks ........................................................................................... 6 Mineral Identification Procedure ............................................ 8 Rock Identification Procedure ............................................... 22 Engineering Properties of Rock Types ................................. 42 Summary ................................................................................... 49 Appendix: References ............................................................. 50 FIGURES 1. Moh's Hardness Scale ......................................................... 10 2. The Mineral Chert ............................................................... 16 3. The Mineral Quartz ............................................................. 16 4. The Mineral Plagioclase ...................................................... 17 5. The Minerals Orthoclase ..................................................... 17 6. The Mineral Hornblende ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnetite-Series and Ilmenite-Series Granitoids in Chile
    MINING GEOLOGY,30(3),183•`190,1980 The Magnetite-series and Ilmenite-series Granitoids in Chile Shunso ISHIHARA*and Carlos E. ULRIKSEN** Abstract: Paleozoic and Mesozoic-Cenozoic granitoids of the Chilean Andes were studied magnetically in the area between Latitude 22-35•KS. The Paleozoic granitoids are found to be composed of the ilmenite-series and weakly magnetic magnetite-series, whereas all the Mesozoic-Cenozoic ones appear to be the magnetite-series. Lack of significant sulfide deposits in the Paleozoic terrains may have been resulted from the reducing nature of the granitic magmatism. Within the magnetite-series terrains of Mesozoic-Cenozoic age, magnetic susceptibility of the granitoids seems to increase continentward. Granitoids related to porphyry copper deposits in the Andean Cordillera have higher magnetic susceptibility than those occurring in the Coast Range which could be genetically associated with manto-type deposits. The different styles of mineralization may possibly be in consequence of the different oxidation status of the granitic magmatism. areas are shown in Figure 1. Introduction Granitoids in Chile Granitoids in the Chilean Andes are dis- tributed continuously from the Peruvian coast Granitoids of Chile occupy about 30 percent batholiths (18•KS) to the southern tip of South of the total land area and occur as large America (54•KS) for more than 4,000 km. These batholiths to small intrusive plugs which may granitoids range in composition, from quartz have brought the effusive equivalents to the diorite to granite, and show different mode of surface along the Andean orogenic belt. Their occurrence, from catazonal to epizonal. Some exposure is seen in two lanes in the northern of the epizonal granitoids are associated with half (18-38•KS); one along the coast while the well-known prophyry copper and manto-type other in the Andean Cordillera.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetite in the Carbonatites from the Jacupiranga Complex, Brazil
    American Mineralogist, Volume 6E, pages 195-213, 1983 Magnetite in the carbonatitesfrom the JacupirangaComplex, Brazil JosB C. Gespan Instituto de GeosciAncias Universidade de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo, Brazil CEP 05508 eNo PBren J. Wyrue Department of Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 Abstract Electron microprobe analysesof magnetitesfrom five carbonatiteintrusions (Cr, oldest, to C5, loungest) constituting the carbonatite plug in the Jacupirangacomplex confirm' previous results from Jacupirangagiving compositions in the magnesioferrite-magnetite series very close to Fe3Oa.Magnetites from other carbonatitesare similar with somewhat more Ti and less Mg. MgO in Jacupirangamagnetites reaches no more than l0 wt.%. All analyzedgrains are zoned, with Fe3Oaincreasing toward the rim. In magnetitesfrom C2 to C5, Fe2O3 replacement is mainly by Al2O3 and less by TiOz; in C1 magnetites TiO2 replacementis more important. Despite their limited range of compositions, the cores of magnetitesin each of the five intrusions are chemically distinct and distinguishablefrom each other as indicated by projections from within the Cr-free spinel prism, MgFe2Oa- MgzTiOa-MgAI2Oa-Fe3Oa-Fe2TiOa-FeAl2Oa,and a plot of Mn ys. Mg. Magnetites from special locations such as dikes, bandedreaction zonesbetween carbonatite andjacupiran- gite, and in intergrowths with pyrite, are chemically related but distinct from the carbonatite magnetites.The systematicchemical variation and zoning of magnetitesin the five carbonatite intrusions indicate magmaticorigin.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Review and New Data from Wadi Kareim 2
    1 Petrological and Geochemical Characteristics of Egyptian Banded Iron Formations: 2 Review and New Data from Wadi Kareim 3 4 K. I. Khalil1, and A. K. El-Shazly2* 5 6 1 Geology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Alexandria, Moharram Bey, Alexandria, 7 Egypt 8 2 Geology Department, Marshall University, 1 John Marshall Dr., Huntington, WV 25755 9 10 *Corresponding Author (e-mail: [email protected]). 11 12 # of words in text: 8307 13 # of words in references: 2144 14 15 Abbreviated title: Egyptian BIFs 16 17 Abstract 18 19 The banded iron formations in the eastern desert of Egypt are small, deformed, bodies 20 intercalated with metamorphosed Neoproterozoic volcaniclastic rocks. Although the 13 21 banded iron deposits have their own mineralogical, chemical, and textural characteristics, 22 they have many similarities, the most notable of which are the lack of sulfide and paucity of 23 carbonate facies minerals, a higher abundance of magnetite over hematite in the oxide 24 facies, and a well-developed banding/ lamination. Compared to Algoma, Superior, and 25 Rapitan type banded iron ores, the Egyptian deposits have very high Fe/Si ratios, high Al2O3 26 content, and HREE-enriched patterns. The absence of wave-generated structures in most of 27 the Egyptian deposits indicates sub-aqueous precipitation below wave base, whereas their 28 intercalation with poorly sorted volcaniclastic rocks with angular clasts suggests a 29 depositional environment proximal to epiclastic influx. The Egyptian deposits likely formed in 30 small fore-arc and back-arc basins through the precipitation of Fe silicate gels under slightly 31 euxinic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetite and Its Transformation to Hematite in a Soil Derived from Steatite 33
    MAGNETITE AND ITS TRANSFORMATION TO HEMATITE IN A SOIL DERIVED FROM STEATITE 33 MAGNETITE AND ITS TRANSFORMATION TO HEMATITE IN A SOIL DERIVED FROM STEATITE(1) G. P. SANTANA(2), J. D. FABRIS(3), A. T. GOULART(4) & D. P. SANTANA(5) SUMMARY The main objective of this work was to characterize the magnetic minerals and to identify their pedogenic transformation on a steatite-forming soil of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The iron-rich spinel phase was characterized by chemical analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, Mössbauer spectroscopy, with and without an externally applied magnetic field of 6 tesla, and saturation magnetization measurements. Nearly stoichiometric and well-crystallized magnetite was the only magnetic mineral actually detected. The cubic unit cell parameter of the fresh rock magnetite was found to be ao = 0.8407(5) nm. Hematite (hexagonal cell; a = 0.5036(3) nm, c = 1.375(4) nm) was detected in the altered rock and in the sand-soil and silt-soil fractions. Magnetite is assumed to transform into hematite during pedogenesis through progressive oxidation of structural Fe2+ to Fe3+. In partially oxidized magnetites, a relatively small proportion of Fe3+ was interpreted as being uncoupled from the Fe2+-Fe3+ charge transfer system, in octahedral sites of the spinel structure. Compositional formulae of magnetite with different degrees of non-stoichiometry are proposed. Ilmenite was found in minor proportions in the magnetically extracted portions from both rock and soil samples. Index terms: Iron-rich spinel, iron oxide, soapstone, magnetic soil, Mössbauer spectroscopy. (1) This work is part of the thesis of the first author, presented to the Departmento de Química of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil, as a partial requirement to obtain the title of Doctor in Science - Chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits
    Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits Open-File Report 2008–1321 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits By Byron R. Berger, Robert A. Ayuso, Jeffrey C. Wynn, and Robert R. Seal Open-File Report 2008–1321 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Berger, B.R., Ayuso, R.A., Wynn, J.C., and Seal, R.R., 2008, Preliminary model of porphyry copper deposits: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1321, 55 p. iii Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Regional Environment ...................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Petrographic Characterization of Ilmenite and Magnetite in Oxide-Rich Cumulates of the Sokndal Region, Rogaland, Norway
    NGU-BULL 436, 2000 - PAGE 49 Chemical and petrographic characterization of ilmenite and magnetite in oxide-rich cumulates of the Sokndal Region, Rogaland, Norway SUZANNE A. McENROE, PETER ROBINSON & PETER T. PANISH McEnroe, S. A., Robinson, P., & Panish, P. T. 2000: Chemical and petrographic characterization of ilmenite and magnetite in oxide-rich cumulates of the Sokndal Region, Rogaland, Norway. Norges geologiske undersøkelse Bulletin 436, 49-56 Igneous ilmenite and magnetite in some oxide-rich cumulates of the Sokndal region show chemical features and microtextures that reflect the progress of magmatic evolution and subsolidus re-equilibration. These features also relate to the patterns of aeromagnetic anomalies in the region. The most primitive oxides studied occur in the Tellnes ilmenite norite. These are followed by oxides in the Bjerkreim-Sokndal layered intrusion, first in ilmenite norites and finally in magnetite-rich norites. The trend of magmatic oxide crystallization in Bjerkreim-Sokndal, as previously determined by Wilson et al. (1996), was from hematite-rich ilmenite with minor end-member magnetite to hematite- poor ilmenite with titanomagnetite, a trend indicating progressive diminution of Fe2O3. This trend was accompanied by decreasing MgO and Cr2O3, and by gradually increasing V2O3 to the point where magnetite became a primary magmatic precipitate: beyond this V2O3 also decreased. In primitive samples the ilmenite has abundant hematite exsolution lamellae, whereas the magnetite has end-member composition and is free or nearly free of lamellae. Highly evolved samples contain near end-member ilmenite without exsolution, and titanomagnetite with fine exsolution of ulvöspinel subsequently oxidized to ilmenite and/or oxidation-exsolution lamellae of ilmenite.
    [Show full text]