DOCSLIB.ORG

Magnesite- Deposits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magnesite- Deposits DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOB 355 THE MAGNESITE- DEPOSITS OF CALIFORNIA BY FRANK L. HESS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Page. General remarks........................................................... 7 Introduction............................................................ 7 Composition, properties, and uses........................................ 8 General character................................................. 8 Manufacture and use of carbon dioxide.............................. 8 Calcination of magnesite............................................ 9 ° Magnesia brick, shapes, and crucibles................................ 11 Magnesium carbonates............................................... 13 Oxychloride cement.................................................. 13 Other uses. .............................-. ---....---- - 14 Market for California magnesite........................................... 15 Production............................................................. 16 Imports of magnesite and its products.................................... 16 Description of deposits...................................................... 17 General statement...................................................... 17 The Coast Range occurrences............................................ 21 Mendocino County................................................. 21 Hixon ranch deposits........................................... 21 Sonoma County. ....i........................... 1................... 22 Creon deposit..................................................... 22 Eckert ranch deposits.......................................... 23 George Hall ranch deposit...................................... 24 Pat Cummings claim............................................ 24 Gilliam Creek deposits......................................... 24 Madeira deposit.................................................. 25 Unnamed deposit............................................. 25 Red Slide deposits.............................................. 26 Norton ranch deposits......................................... 28 ^ Napa County........................................................ 28 General remarks................................................ 28 Walters or White Rock deposit................................. " 28 Snowflake and Blanco claims.................................. 29 Priest deposit.................................................. 31 Russell deposit.........................:...................... 31 Matthai deposits. ............................................... 31 Santa Clara County................................................ 31 Deposits near Coyote........................................... 31 Bay Cities Water Company's land............................... 32 Mrs. A. F. Cochrane's land..................................... 33 Red Mountain deposits........................................... 33 Other Santa Clara County deposits................................ 37 Alameda County.................................................. 37 King claim................................................... 37 Banta's camp deposit........................................... 37 Stanislaus Cqunty.........................................'......... 37 San Benito County................................................. 38 4 CONTENTS. Description of deposits Continued. The Coast Rar.ge occurrences Continued. Page. San Luis Obispo County............................................ 38 Santa Barbara County............................................. 38 Riverside County...........'...................................... 38 The Sierra Nevada occurrences,......................................... 39 Kern County......................:................................ 39 Tulare County..................................................... 39 White River deposits........................................... 39 Deer Creek deposits............................................ 39 Porterville deposits............................................ 39 Deposits on South Fork of Tule River.......................... 46 Round Valley deposits.......................................... 48 Deposits near Exeter........................................... 49 Naranjo deposits............................................... 49 Other Tulare County deposits.,......................:.......... 49 Fresno County.................................................... 50 Mariposa and Tuolumne counties................................... 51 Placer County....................^..................'.............. 52 Magnesite deposits in other countries................:...................... 52 North America. ....................................................... 53 Canada............................................................ 53 Quebec........................................................ 53 British Columbia............................................... 53 Mexico........................................................... 54 Lower California.............................................. 54 . South America........................................................ 55 Venezuela........................................................ 55 Europe................................................. ^.............. 55 Austria............................................................ 55 Hungary.............. 1............................................ 56 Germany.......................................................... 56 Greece............................................................ 57 Italy............................................................ 58 Macedonia........................................................ 58 Norway............................................................ 59 Russia.......................................................'..... 60 Africa. ............................................................... 60 Transvaal......................................................... 60 Other African deposits.............................................. 61 Asia................................................................... 61 India................:.........................., ................. 61 Madras........................................................ 61 Mysore......................................................... 61 Ceylon....................................................... 61 Australia............................."................................ 62 Queensland....................................................... 62 New South Wales,................................................ 62 South Australia..................................................... 62 . Tasmania......................................................... 62 Oceania.............................................................. 63 New Caledonia...................................................... 63 Index.................................................................... 65 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Map of California, showing distribution of magnesite deposits........ 7 II. Specimens of magnesite, showing conchoidal fracture .............. 8 III. Weathered surfaces of magnesite................................... 18 IV. A, Small irregular vein of magnesite in serpentine; B, Magnesite weathered under several inches of clay ........................... 20 V. A, Outcrop of magnesite on Hixon ranch, Mendocino County; B, Entrance to lower tunnel on Sonoma Magnesite Company's claim, near Cazadero; C, Outcrop of magnesite vein on Walters claim, Pope Valley................................................... 20 VI. Cracks in magnesite apparently due to shrinkage: A, Compact magnesite from the Hixon ranch, Mendocino County; B, Less compact magnesite coated with a thin layer of quartz, also cracked, from locality 4 miles northeast of Porterville............. 22 VII. Structure of magnesite on Bay Cities Water Company's land on Coyote Creek: A, Specimen from the upper deposit, showing a natural surface; P>, Specimen from the lower deposit, showing a smoothly ground surface ...................................... 32 VIII. A, Stockwork of magnesite veins 3J miles south of Winchester; B, Sheeted serpeniine containing many thin veins of magnesite near Deer Creek, Tulare County.-............................... 38. IX. A, Amphibolite dike cutting through flat vein of 'magnesite; B, Crushed magnesite vein near Porterville,....................:... 40 X. Northern hill at the Willamette Pulp and Paper Company's mag­ nesite mine near Porterville: A, Nearly vertical vein; B, Lower '' blanket'' vein................................................ 42 XI. A, Outcrop of stockwork of veins at north end of Willamette Pulp and Paper Company's deposits near Porterville; B, Furnace for calcin­ ing magnesite at Willamette Pulp and Paper Company's magnesite mine near Porterville .......................................... 44 XII. A, Magnesite vein on south side of Kings River, 9 miles east of . Sanger, Gal.; B, Magnesite vein on Snow Cap claim, north side of Kings River, 9 miles east of Sanger............................. 50 FIG. 1. Diagram of Western Carbonic Acid Company's plant at Sedan, Cal.... 9 2. Plan of magnesite veins and workings 4 miles northeast of Porter­ ville, Cal.....................................................'.... 42 3. Diagram showing mode of working a highly inclined magnesite vein at Willamette Pulp and Paper Company's mine near Porterville, Cal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Flotation Separation of Mg Carbonates (Dolomite and Magnesite)
    minerals Review A Review of Flotation Separation of Mg Carbonates (Dolomite and Magnesite) Darius G. Wonyen 1,†, Varney Kromah 1,†, Borbor Gibson 1,† ID , Solomon Nah 1,† and Saeed Chehreh Chelgani 1,2,* ID 1 Department of Geology and Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Liberia, P.O. Box 9020 Monrovia, Liberia; [email protected] (D.G.W.); [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (B.G.); [email protected] (S.N.) 2 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-41-6830-9356 † These authors contributed equally to the study. Received: 24 July 2018; Accepted: 13 August 2018; Published: 15 August 2018 Abstract: It is well documented that flotation has high economic viability for the beneficiation of valuable minerals when their main ore bodies contain magnesium (Mg) carbonates such as dolomite and magnesite. Flotation separation of Mg carbonates from their associated valuable minerals (AVMs) presents several challenges, and Mg carbonates have high levels of adverse effects on separation efficiency. These complexities can be attributed to various reasons: Mg carbonates are naturally hydrophilic, soluble, and exhibit similar surface characteristics as their AVMs. This study presents a compilation of various parameters, including zeta potential, pH, particle size, reagents (collectors, depressant, and modifiers), and bio-flotation, which were examined in several investigations into separating Mg carbonates from their AVMs by froth flotation. Keywords: dolomite; magnesite; flotation; bio-flotation 1. Introduction Magnesium (Mg) carbonates (salt-type minerals) are typical gangue phases associated with several valuable minerals, and have complicated processing [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tungsten Indicator Minerals Scheelite and Wolframite with Examples from the Sisson W-Mo Deposit, Canada
    Overview of tungsten indicator minerals scheelite and wolframite with examples from the Sisson W-Mo deposit, Canada M. Beth McClenaghan1, M.A. Parkhill2, A.A. Seaman3, A.G. Pronk3, M. McCurdy1 & D.J. Kontak4 1Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8 (e-mail: [email protected]) 2New Brunswick Department of Energy and Mines, Geological Surveys Branch, P.O. Box 50, Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada E2A 3Z1 3New Brunswick Department of Energy and Mines, Geological Surveys Branch, P.O. Box 6000, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5H1 4Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada P3E 2C6 These short course notes provide an overview of published lit- Table 1. List of regional surveys and case studies conducted around erature on the use of scheelite and wolframite as indicator min- the world in which scheelite and/or wolframite in surficial sediments erals for W, Mo, and Au exploration. The use of scheelite and have been used as indicator minerals. wolframite in stream sediments is well documented for mineral Mineral Media Location Source of Information exploration but less so for using glacial sediments (Table 1). scheelite stream sediments Pakistan Asrarullah (1982) wolframite stream sediments Burma ESCAP Scretariat (1982) The Geological Survey of Canada has recently conducted a scheelite, wolframite stream sediments USA Theobald & Thompson (1960) glacial till and stream sediment indicator mineral case study scheelite stream sediments, soil Thailand Silakul (1986) around the Sisson W-Mo deposit in eastern Canada. scheelite stream sediments Greenland Hallenstein et al. (1981) Preliminary indicator mineral results from this ongoing study scheelite stream sediments Spain Fernández-Turiel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Mineral Products in Our Bedroom Bed Hematite
    Minerals and Mineral Products in our Bedroom Make-Up Kit Muscovite Bed Talc Hematite: hinges, handles, Mica mattress springs Hematite: for color Chromite: chrome plating Bismuth Radio Barite Copper: wiring Plastic Pail Quartz: clock Mica Gold: connections Cassiterite: solder Toilet Bowl / Tub Closet Feldspar: porcelain Chromite: chrome plating Pyrolusite: coloring Hematite: hinges, handles (steel) Chromite: plumbing fixtures Quartz : mirror on door Copper: tubing Desk Toothpaste Hematite: hinges, handles (steel) Apatite: teeth Chromite: chrome plating Fluorite: toothpaste Mirror Rutile: to color false Hematite: handle, frame teeth yellow Chromite: plating Gold: fillings Gold: plating Cinnabar: fillings Quartz: mirror Towels Table Lamp Sphalerite: dyes Brass (an alloy of copper and Chromite: dyes zinc): base Quartz: bulb Water Pipe/Faucet/Shower bulb Wolframite: lamp filament Brass Copper: wiring Iron Nickel Minerals and Mineral Products in our Bedroom Chrome: stainless steel Bathroom Cleaner Department of Environment and Natural Resources Borax: abrasive, cleaner, and antiseptic MINES AND GEOSCIENCES BUREAU Deodorant Spray Can Cassiterite Chromite Copper Carpet Quartz Sphalerite: dyes Telephone Chromite: dyes Drinking Glasses Copper: wiring Sulfur: foam padding Quartz Chromite: plating Gold: red color Clock Silver: electronics Pentlandite: spring Graphite: batteries Refrigerator Quartz: glass, time keeper Hematite Television Chromite: stainless steel Chromite: plating Computer Galena Wolframite: monitor Wolframite: monitor Copper Copper:
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficient Improvement of Original Magnetite in Iron Ore Reduction
    minerals Article The Efficient Improvement of Original Magnetite in Iron Ore Reduction Reaction in Magnetization Roasting Process and Mechanism Analysis by In Situ and Continuous Image Capture Bing Zhao 1,2, Peng Gao 1,2,*, Zhidong Tang 1,2 and Wuzhi Zhang 1,2 1 School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China; [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (Z.T.); [email protected] (W.Z.) 2 National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of High-Efficient Exploitation Technology for Refractory Iron Ore Resources, Shenyang 110819, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-024-8368-8920 Abstract: Magnetization roasting followed by magnetic separation is considered an effective method for recovering iron minerals. As hematite and magnetite are the main concomitant constituents in iron ores, the separation index after the magnetization roasting will be more optimized than with only hematite. In this research, the mechanism of the original magnetite improving iron ore reduction during the magnetization roasting process was explored using ore fines and lump ore samples. Under optimum roasting conditions, the iron grade increased from 62.17% to 65.22%, and iron recovery increased from 84.02% to 92.02% after separation, when Fe in the original magnetite content increased from 0.31% to 8.09%, although the Fe masses in each sample were equal. For lump ores with magnetite and hematite intergrowth, the method of in situ and continuous image capture Citation: Zhao, B.; Gao, P.; Tang, Z.; for microcrack generation and the evolution of the magnetization roasting process was innovatively Zhang, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Magnetite-Hematite Concentrate from Iron Ore Tailings
    E3S Web of Conferences 247, 01042 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124701042 ICEPP-2021 Recovery of magnetite-hematite concentrate from iron ore tailings Mikhail Khokhulya1,*, Alexander Fomin1, and Svetlana Alekseeva1 1Mining Institute of Kola Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, 184209, Russia Abstract. The research is aimed at study of the probable recovery of iron from the tailings of the Olcon mining company located in the north-western Arctic zone of Russia. Material composition of a sample from a tailings dump was analysed. The authors have developed a separation production technology to recover magnetite-hematite concentrate from the tailings. A processing flowsheet includes magnetic separation, milling and gravity concentration methods. The separation technology provides for production of iron ore concentrate with total iron content of 65.9% and recovers 91.0% of magnetite and 80.5% of hematite from the tailings containing 20.4% of total iron. The proposed technology will increase production of the concentrate at a dressing plant and reduce environmental impact. 1 Introduction The mineral processing plant of the Olcon JSC, located at the Murmansk region, produces magnetite- At present, there is an important problem worldwide in hematite concentrate. The processing technology the disposal of waste generated during the mineral includes several magnetic separation stages to produce production and processing. Tailings dumps occupy huge magnetite concentrate and two jigging stages to produce areas and pollute the environment. However, waste hematite concentrate from a non-magnetic fraction of material contains some valuable components that can be magnetic separation [13]. used in various industries. In the initial period of plant operation (since 1955) In Russia, mining-induced waste occupies more than iron ore tailings were stored in the Southern Bay of 300 thousand hectares of lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Iron Formations
    Banded Iron Formations Cover Slide 1 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures Kalmina gorge banded iron (Gypsy Denise 2013, Creative Commons) BIFs were deposited in shallow marine troughs or basins. Deposits are tens of km long, several km wide and 150 – 600 m thick. Photo is of Kalmina gorge in the Pilbara (Karijini National Park, Hamersley Ranges) 2 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures • Bands of iron rich and iron poor rock Iron rich bands: hematite (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), siderite (FeCO3) or pyrite (FeS2). Iron poor bands: chert (fine‐grained quartz) and low iron oxide levels Rock sample from a BIF (Woudloper 2009, Creative Commons 1.0) Iron rich bands are composed of hematitie (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), siderite (FeCO3) or pyrite (FeS2). The iron poor bands contain chert (fine‐grained quartz) with lesser amounts of iron oxide. 3 What are Banded Iron Formations (BIFs)? • Large sedimentary structures • Bands of iron rich and iron poor rock • Archaean and Proterozoic in age BIF formation through time (KG Budge 2020, public domain) BIFs were deposited for 2 billion years during the Archaean and Proterozoic. There was another short time of deposition during a Snowball Earth event. 4 Why are BIFs important? • Iron ore exports are Australia’s top earner, worth $61 billion in 2017‐2018 • Iron ore comes from enriched BIF deposits Rio Tinto iron ore shiploader in the Pilbara (C Hargrave, CSIRO Science Image) Australia is consistently the leading iron ore exporter in the world. We have large deposits where the iron‐poor chert bands have been leached away, leaving 40%‐60% iron.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Gemstone Resources of China
    A SURVEY OF THE GEMSTONE RESOURCES OF CHINA By Peter C. Keller and Wang Fuquan The People's Republic of China has recently hina has historically been a land of great mystery, placed a high priority on identifying and C with natural resources and cultural treasures that, developing its gemstone resources. Initial until recently, were almost entirely hidden from the out- exploration by teams of geologists side world. From the point of view of the geologist and throughout China has identified many gemologist, one could only look at known geological maps deposits with significant potential, of this huge country and speculate on the potential impact including amher, cinnabar, garnets, blue sapphires, and diamonds. Small amounts of China would have on the world's gem markets if its gem ruby have' qlso been found. Major deposits resources were ever developed to their full potential. of nephriteyade as well as large numbers of During the past few years, the government of the Peo- gem-bearing pegmatite dilces have been ple's Republic of China (P.R.C.)has opened its doors to the identified.Significant deposits of peridot outside world in a quest for information and a desire for are crirrently being exploited from Hebei scientific and cultural cooperation. It was in this spirit of Province. Lastly, turqrloise rivaling the cooperation that a week-long series of lectures on gem- finest Persian material has been found in stones and their origins was presented by the senior author large quantities in Hubei and Shaanxi and a colleague to over 100 geologists from all over China Provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Deposits
    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL Earth Sci. Res. J. Vol. 20, No. 3 (September, 2016 ) : A1 - A10 ORE DEPOSITS Occurrence of Cr-bearing beryl in stream sediment from Eskişehir, NW Turkey Hülya Erkoyun and Selahattin Kadir * Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Deparment of Geological Engineering, TR−26480 Eskişehir, Turkey [email protected] [email protected] *corresponding author ABSTRACT Keywords: Beryl, Kaymaz, schist, SEM-EDX, IR. Beryl crystals are found within stream sediments transecting schists in the northeast of Eskişehir, western Anatolia. This paper studied the Eskişehir beryl crystals with optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDX), infrared spectroscopy (IR) and geochemical analyses. Beryl is accompanied by garnet, glaucophane, quartz, epidote, muscovite and chlorite in the stream sediments. The crystals are euhedral emerald (green gem beryl) and light bluish- green aquamarine, with ideal sharp IR bands. Wet chemical analysis of Eskişehir beryl yielded 61.28% SiO2, 15.13% Al2O3, 12.34% BeO, 0.18% Cr2O3, 1.49% MgO, 1.69% Na2O, 0.98% Fe2O3, and 0.008% V2O3, resulting in the formula (Al1.75Cr0.01Mg0.22Fe0.08)(Be2.90Si6.00)(Na0.32)O18. Large Ion Lithophile Elements (LILE) (barium, strontium), some transition metals (cobalt, except nickel) and High Field Strength Elements (HFSE) (niobium, zirconium, and yttrium) in stream sediments that are associated with beryl exhibited low content about metamorphic rocks. Beryl formation appears to be controlled by upthrust faults and fractures that juxtaposed them with Cr-bearing ophiolitic units and a regime of metasomatic reactions. Such beryl crystals have also been found in detrital sediments that are derived from the schists. Presencia de berilios relacionados con Cromo en corrientes sedimentarias de Eskisehir, noroeste de Turquía RESUMEN Cristales de berilio fueron encontrados en sedimentos de corrientes que atraviesan en esquistos en el noreste de Palabras clave: Berilio, Kaymaz, esquistos, Eskisehir, al oeste de Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • New Minerals Approved Bythe Ima Commission on New
    NEW MINERALS APPROVED BY THE IMA COMMISSION ON NEW MINERALS AND MINERAL NAMES ALLABOGDANITE, (Fe,Ni)l Allabogdanite, a mineral dimorphous with barringerite, was discovered in the Onello iron meteorite (Ni-rich ataxite) found in 1997 in the alluvium of the Bol'shoy Dolguchan River, a tributary of the Onello River, Aldan River basin, South Yakutia (Republic of Sakha- Yakutia), Russia. The mineral occurs as light straw-yellow, with strong metallic luster, lamellar crystals up to 0.0 I x 0.1 x 0.4 rnrn, typically twinned, in plessite. Associated minerals are nickel phosphide, schreibersite, awaruite and graphite (Britvin e.a., 2002b). Name: in honour of Alia Nikolaevna BOG DAN OVA (1947-2004), Russian crys- tallographer, for her contribution to the study of new minerals; Geological Institute of Kola Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity. fMA No.: 2000-038. TS: PU 1/18632. ALLOCHALCOSELITE, Cu+Cu~+PbOZ(Se03)P5 Allochalcoselite was found in the fumarole products of the Second cinder cone, Northern Breakthrought of the Tolbachik Main Fracture Eruption (1975-1976), Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. It occurs as transparent dark brown pris- matic crystals up to 0.1 mm long. Associated minerals are cotunnite, sofiite, ilin- skite, georgbokiite and burn site (Vergasova e.a., 2005). Name: for the chemical composition: presence of selenium and different oxidation states of copper, from the Greek aA.Ao~(different) and xaAxo~ (copper). fMA No.: 2004-025. TS: no reliable information. ALSAKHAROVITE-Zn, NaSrKZn(Ti,Nb)JSi401ZJz(0,OH)4·7HzO photo 1 Labuntsovite group Alsakharovite-Zn was discovered in the Pegmatite #45, Lepkhe-Nel'm MI.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAGNESITE DEPOS11's of WASHINGTON Their Occurrence and Technology
    WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SUR\ EY HENRY LANDES, State Geologist BULLETIN NO. 25 THE MAGNESITE DEPOS11'S OF WASHINGTON Their Occurrence and Technology By GEORGE E. WHITWELL and ERNEST N. P A'l1TY OLYMPIA FRANK K . LAMBORN ~ P UBLIC PRINTER 1921 BOARD O:H' GEOLOGICAL TRYEY GoYernor Lours F. HART, Olwirma11. , tatc Trea. m·cr C. L. B.,LlrocK, H('cre lary. Pre. i<l e11 t Hirn RY rz:z., 1,1.0. President EnxEt";T 0. H o1.1 .,,:--o. fuxnY L .\XOES, S ta te a,,olooisl. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Governor L oui::; F. Hart, Chafrman, and Members of the Board of Geologtcal t:liir·vey: GmnLEMEX : I have the honor to submit herewith a report entitled "The :Magnesite Deposits of Washing­ ton; Their Occurrence and Technolo 0 y ,'' hy George E. Wl1i twell and Ernest N. Patty, with the recommendation that it be printed as Bulletin No. 25 of the Sttr\·ey reports. V Cl'Y respectfully, HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. Univ er. i ty Station, Seattle, January 15, 192]. CONTENTS. Page GEXt:IIAf, STATE,\1 1•: XT. 11 Introduction . 11 Mineralogy and composition....... ........... 12 General character or magnesite..... ....... ................. 14 Comparative analyses......................... .............. 15 Dt:SCllll'TlOX OF TIU; Di::POSITS.................................... 16 Location . 16 Discovery and history of develotJment......................... 16 Transportation . 22 ~fining methods.. 23 Power . 26 Geology . 27 Occurrence and geologic relations. 27 Reserves . 28 Structural features.... 28 Genesis . 31 Prospecting . 39 Northwest Magnesite Company. 41 Finch deposit. 41 General features............. 41 Description or the deposit. 41 Mining methods employed............................. 43 Description or coarse crushing plant. ................. 44 Keystone deposit ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Evaluation and Perspectives of the Magnesite Mine in the Deposit “Dubovc”
    Modern Environmental Science and Engineering (ISSN 2333-2581) September 2016, Volume 2, No. 9, pp. 620-624 Doi: 10.15341/mese(2333-2581)/09.02.2016/006 Academic Star Publishing Company, 2016 www.academicstar.us Economic Evaluation and Perspectives of the Magnesite Mine in the Deposit “Dubovc” Ramiz Krasniqi1, Arta Xhylani2, Jahir Gashi1, and Fadil Bajraktari3 1. Independent Commission for Mines and Mineral, Armend Daci No. 1, Prishtinë, Kosovo 2. University of Prishtina, Kosovo 3. Ministy of Environment and spatial Planning, Kosovo Abstract: In The magnesite deposit “Dubovc” is located in the area of the village with the same name, about 10 km, in Southwest of Vushtrri in the north slopes of Çiçavice mountain. The deposit has been explored in the great mass with a relatively dense network of underground mining operations and drilling so today we can say that the exploration level of deposits is satisfactory. The deposit is represented by two great magnesite veins laying in the North west and South southeast direction, and according to the data of exploration operations it lays in the NE direction, except in the deeper parts dictated of surrounding rocks the vein will entirely change the angle and direction of dipping. The done studies in the period from the mining interruption until now has denied the opinion of some previous researchers of this deposit, that calculate only for main veins of the deposit “Dubovc”, the deposit contains 1.5-2 million tons of reserves. The general final calculated reserves for all deposit “Dubovc” are 964 949 tons, from which the North part 409 898 ton, and South part 555 051 ton magnesite.
    [Show full text]
  • CARBONATE and MAGNETITE PARAGENESES AS MONITORS of CARBON DIOXIDE and OXYGEN FUGACITY Andrea M
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI 1424.pdf CARBONATE AND MAGNETITE PARAGENESES AS MONITORS OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND OXYGEN FUGACITY Andrea M. Koziol, Department of Geology, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-2364 USA; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction: A geologist or meteoriticist magnetite grains, led Brearley to suggest that a may have before them an assemblage of miner- later reheating event caused the carbonate to als that together record a history of the tem- decompose. The CO2 evolved would produce perature, pressure, and fluid composition that the small voids. The siderite component of the the rock has experienced. Certain key minerals carbonate would preferentially break down, do record water, CO2, and O2 fugacities. forming magnetite [5]. Siderite, FeCO3, is one of those key miner- als. The stable coexistence of siderite with an- Alternatively, an increase in oxygen fugac- other key mineral, such as graphite or magnet- ity would promote magnetite formation by ite (Fe3O4), is only possible under certain re- strictive conditions. If other variables are 3 FeCO3 + 1/2 (O2) = Fe3O4 + 3 CO2. (1) known, the activity or fugacity of CO2 or O2 in the fluid phase once present in the rock can Oxygen fugacity could change as pore fluid often be estimated. This is an oxybarometer: a changes, or as certain mineral reactions pro- way of estimating oxygen fugacity (fO2) from gress. The oxygen may not be present in a gas mineral assemblages. The results can be used to phase, but may be dissolved in a fluid or supplied understand parageneses of iron-rich carbonate by a mineral.
    [Show full text]