DOCSLIB.ORG

NATIVE BANGLES and ROMAN GLASS. 211 Hyndford.— E Fragmentth Onef O S from This Cranno S Describegwa Y Db Kilbride-Jones Howeves I T I Typs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATIVE BANGLES and ROMAN GLASS. 211 Hyndford.— E Fragmentth Onef O S from This Cranno S Describegwa Y Db Kilbride-Jones Howeves I T I Typs 208 PROCEEDING E SOCIETYTH F O S , 1954-56. XVI. NATIVE BANGLE ROMAD AN S N GLASS. BY ROBER . KTB . STEVENSON, M.A., F.S.A.ScoT., Keepe re Museum oth f . The need to record a number of specimens that have come to the Museum's notice since the War has led to a study of various aspects of Scottish glass armlets mighe on : t rather call them bracelet bangler so n i s vie theif wo r small diameter presumptioe th d an , n tha smallese th t t ones, being only 1-65 ins. across inside really ,ma y have been pendants like those hung from women's tore pre-Roman i s n France likd an e, undoubtet dje ring-pendants, from Traprain,1 and Cairngryffe, Lanarkshire,2 for example. The groundwork of the subject is due to H. E. Kilbride-Jones, whose comprehensive pape n 193entitles i r wa 8 d "Glass Armlet Britain.n i s " 3 showee H d that mos beed tha n foun Scotlandn di , notabl t Trapraiya n Law, assigned them to the late 1st and 2nd century A.D., and distinguished three types heavy) (1 : , more than semicircula sectionn i r , wit opaqun ha e surface layer of yellow and other colours; (2) less heavy, a blunted triangle in section transparenf o , t glass having inlaid cord r cablesso , generally white d bluean , running lengthwise d occasionallan , y similar spiral spots) (3 ; resembling Type 2 in shape, but commonly almost opaque white or yellow throughout, and either plain or ornamented with trailed, and usually marvered, "pot-hook" pattern n bluei s , whit r yelloo e thosn wo o tw e colours or on others—the various colour combinations forming his sub- types A to J plus a number of exceptional pieces. followine Th g notes cover three main topics ) Additiona(a , l examples of bangles are gathered together or published for the first time, (b) Some unusual pieces of Types 2 and 3 are shown to be connected very closely with one another, (c) The use of Roman glass as raw material is suggested. • Minor amendments to Kilbride-Jones' paper are put forward in each section. Almosspecimene th l al t s discusse fragments.e dar 4 r assistancFo compilinn ei liste gbanglef th so sI mus . M t. thanC s kMr Piggott, Mrs J. G. Scott, Mrs F. S. Oliver, Mr W. Bulmer, Mr G. C. Dunning, . Calkin . B Gilyard-Beer. MasonR . B r J M . r J M r, M ,. CottrillF r M r , M , varioue staffe th Jopeth . f o sd M s. an ,Museum E s cited. 1 P.S.A.S., LV, 194, fig. 24; internal diameter1-0d an 5 . insin .s1 2 Ibid., LXSV, 217; internal diameter -7 in. 3 Ibid., ixxil, 366-95. Cited here as K-J. asterisn A 4 k (.*) indicates tha specimee Nationae tth th n i ns i l CoEectiou. NATIVE BANGLE ROMAD AN S9 20 N GLASS. (a) Additional Examples. The additions are listed in Table I, with references, but a number of them raise points that require discussion. *Braidwood.—-This specimen (fig. 1.1) clearly belong Kilbride-Joneso st ' Type 1, confined to Scotland and, he argued, belonging to the latter half of the 1st century A.D., of which no two are exactly alike. In this case there are two peculiarities. Firstly, the core is a very dark glass, almost black, closese th t parallel whico st rare har e Typ banglee3 s from Trapraiw nLa (K-J, *fig. 7.9). Secondly, over this core were laid broad oblique bandf o s opaque crimson and white, and then the white in turn was mostly coated with chrome yello juss surfaca e leavo wo t th s n eo e thin greyish-white lines l yellowothed al an between rI d specimen.re e nth yelloe sth wapplies i d directly to the core, which is generally a transparent ice-green like Roman bottle-glass, but sometimes whitish and opaque. Though bot hBraidwooe endth f so d piec brokene ear showe on , s that i t had a cut surface and a neck or groove round it, as if to receive a metal colla rnexe joininth to t segment t gi . Thi sucs si hvera y common feature o£ Type 1 bangles—15 out of 22, most of the minority being uncharacteristic in other ways—that it is scarcely possible that collars were only repairs, used after a bangle had been accidentally broken. These ornaments must have been in segments when new, though it is hard1 to say why, particularly since the obvious interruption of the patterns shows that they were made in longer lengths than the existing segments. These vary greatly, and some with groove vere t eithear sa y d shortren . *Dod Law.—Another typical Type 1 segment, with both ends grooved (fig. 1.3), has in addition at one end the semicircular channel of a perforation from outside to in (radial), as if for a stout pin through the presumed metal collar. n unremarkeThia s i s d featur f somo e e bangles—parallelea n o d piece from *Traprai thrementionee n b o o d ent (levean ) d M3 lbelow e Th . surfac commoe bangle Doyellod w th th an ds La f o ed wstripesen ha i n re , core th purpls e i t bu e streaked lengthwise with white (se . 216)ep . * Unlocalised, perhaps from Traprain, there is a very curious little piece .(fig. 1.4). It is a hybrid between Types 1 and 3, and so demonstrates at least a chronological overlap. Much slighter than is normal in Type 1, it form completa s t unusuallebu y short segment grooved t eithean da d en r with a semicircular perforation, in this case from side to side—as on a piece from *Camelon (K-J, fig. 1.11). The surface is coated with Type 1 opaque yellow enamel on which is a spot of the characteristic red, but there seem als havo t e been Typ pot-hooke3 blua blun sd i e ean lin e along each lower margin (see p. 215). The core is greenish-yellow semi-translucent glass characteristi Typf c. o B e3 1 K-J . 370p , , after P.8.A.S., L, 105. 4 1 VOL. LXXXVIII. iiiIllitosn(fiiiiSss*fii«sKrSf^i II . Braidwoo1 . FigType1 . 1 d Port, Midlothian . Hyndfor2 . d Crannog, Lanarkshire Lawd ,Do . 3 . Northumberland. Type 1/3. 4. Locality unknown. Bead. 5. Mochrum Loch, Wigtownshire. Dunagoi6 Type . 2 l Port, Bute . Bdgersto7 . u Fort ,. Newstead8 Box. , Rox . Traprai9 . n Law. 10-13. .Hyndford Cranuog, Lanarkshire. Type . Bdgersto31.14 n Port, Box. excep1 (Al1/ l t 5, differens ha d an twhic 1 colou2/ s hi r conventions.) NATIVE BANGLES AND ROMAN GLASS. 211 Hyndford.— e fragmentth Onef o s from this cranno s describegwa y db Kilbride-Jones howeves i t I Typs . placehi rC o surele3 n e i wh ,b t d i o yt attached to Type 1 because of the heavy cross-section (fig. 1.2) and the broad oblique bands of yellow, once sunk deep into the blue matrix and now almost entirely gone but restored in the drawing. Moreover, both ends are grooved, and one has a side to side channel. Kilbride-Jones' ascription was un- fortunate, since he based part of his chronological argument on it; 1 but his main conclusions need not be disturbed on that account. This bangle's e normath f o cor ls i e"bottle-glass, " showin n sectiogi n slightly opaque papery folds, while the outer surface is a capping of attractive opaque pale blue (se . 214)ep . Ther five ear e Typ fragmente2 s from Hyndforde on d an , of these is grooved like Type 1—at both ends. Only one other Type 2 fragment seems to be grooved, from *Traprain (K-J, fig. 3.1), and grooving is unknow Typn i apare3 t fro hybrie mth d described above presumes i t I . d that bangles of Types 2 and 3 were normally continuous rings, and in fact intact specimens are known: Type 2, York; Type 3 A, *Flanders Moss and *Kintore, 3 I, Wall, Staffs., and London. Distribution.—After addin Kilbride-Joneso gt ' example additione sth n si Table I, including some to be discussed in the next section, the distributions typee oyelloth fd banglf showan s o a d we re efig banglen ar i e . 2.Th 2f so Type 1 are still virtually confined to SE. Scotland. Types 2 and 3 are seen to be even more widely scattered than he realised, but without significant differences from each other and still preponderantly south Scottish. Despite complete Typ bangleI e3 s from Wal Londond Silchestelan a d ,an r fragment, most Typ I examplee3 stile ar sl northern t onlfragmene bu :yon t comes from Traprain. The area north of the Forth, later to be the boundary of Pictland, plainly stood matteapare othen th i n bangled f ti ro di thing t i s sa s —the heavy bronze armlets are correspondingly northern, for example. Four out of five northern specimens of Type 1 are, it should be noticed, very different from the southern ones. Date.—See next section. Bead.—Though only connected wit banglee techniquehs th it y sb rara , e bead from Mochrum, Wigtownshire, may be illustrated here. It has eight bluwhitd ean e marvered spiral spots, themselves arrange spiraa n di l round 3 the globular core of ice-green glass (fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Chronology for Crannogs in North-East Scotland. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 147, Pp
    Stratigos, M. J. and Noble, G. (2018) A new chronology for crannogs in north-east Scotland. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 147, pp. 147-173. (doi:10.9750/PSAS.147.1254) There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/165849/ Deposited on: 25 July 2018 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk This is the peer-reviewed, revised but unedited version of an article which will be published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. A new chronology for crannogs in north-east Scotland Michael J Stratigos and Gordon Noble ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a programme of investigation which aimed to construct a more detailed understanding of the character and chronology of crannog occupation in north- east Scotland, targeting a series of sites across the region. The emerging pattern revealed through targeted fieldwork in the region shows broad similarities to the existing corpus of data from crannogs in other parts of the country. Crannogs in north-east Scotland now show evidence for origins in the Iron Age. Further radiocarbon evidence has emerged from crannogs in the region revealing occupation during the 9th–10th centuries ad, a period for which there is little other settlement evidence in the area. Additionally, excavated contexts dated to the 11th–12th centuries and historic records suggest that the tradition of crannog dwelling continued into the later medieval period.
    [Show full text]
  • “Whiskey in the Jar”: History and Transformation of a Classic Irish Song Masters Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of
    “Whiskey in the Jar”: History and Transformation of a Classic Irish Song Masters Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Dana DeVlieger, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Music The Ohio State University 2016 Thesis Committee: Graeme M. Boone, Advisor Johanna Devaney Anna Gawboy Copyright by Dana Lauren DeVlieger 2016 Abstract “Whiskey in the Jar” is a traditional Irish song that is performed by musicians from many different musical genres. However, because there are influential recordings of the song performed in different styles, from folk to punk to metal, one begins to wonder what the role of the song’s Irish heritage is and whether or not it retains a sense of Irish identity in different iterations. The current project examines a corpus of 398 recordings of “Whiskey in the Jar” by artists from all over the world. By analyzing acoustic markers of Irishness, for example an Irish accent, as well as markers of other musical traditions, this study aims explores the different ways that the song has been performed and discusses the possible presence of an “Irish feel” on recordings that do not sound overtly Irish. ii Dedication Dedicated to my grandfather, Edward Blake, for instilling in our family a love of Irish music and a pride in our heritage iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Graeme Boone, for showing great and enthusiasm for this project and for offering advice and support throughout the process. I would also like to thank Johanna Devaney and Anna Gawboy for their valuable insight and ideas for future directions and ways to improve.
    [Show full text]
  • Crannogs — These Small Man-Made Islands
    PART I — INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION Islands attract attention.They sharpen people’s perceptions and create a tension in the landscape. Islands as symbols often create wish-images in the mind, sometimes drawing on the regenerative symbolism of water. This book is not about natural islands, nor is it really about crannogs — these small man-made islands. It is about the people who have used and lived on these crannogs over time.The tradition of island-building seems to have fairly deep roots, perhaps even going back to the Mesolithic, but the traces are not unambiguous.While crannogs in most cases have been understood in utilitarian terms as defended settlements and workshops for the wealthier parts of society, or as fishing platforms, this is not the whole story.I am interested in learning more about them than this.There are many other ways to defend property than to build islands, and there are many easier ways to fish. In this book I would like to explore why island-building made sense to people at different times. I also want to consider how the use of islands affects the way people perceive themselves and their landscape, in line with much contemporary interpretative archaeology,and how people have drawn on the landscape to create and maintain long-term social institutions as well as to bring about change. The book covers a long time-period, from the Mesolithic to the present. However, the geographical scope is narrow. It focuses on the region around Lough Gara in the north-west of Ireland and is built on substantial fieldwork in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • VIKING AGE SILVER HOARDS in IRELAND Regional Trade and Cultural Identity
    VIKING AGE SILVER HOARDS IN IRELAND Regional trade and cultural identity Linn Marie Krogsrud Master’s thesis in Archaeology Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo Autumn 2008 Cover image: Unlocalized mixed hoard from Antrim c. AD 910 (after Sheehan 2001:54; with courtesy of Ulster Museum, Belfast) Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my supervisor Lotte Hedeager for her constructive support and optimism. She has made this thesis seem, at times, almost easy to write. Secondly, my other supervisor Stephen Harrison deserves much credit for all his help: his knowledge of Viking Age Ireland and supply of hand-outs have been invaluable. A warm thank you also goes to Julie Lund for stepping in for Lotte. John Sheehan and Charles Doherty willingly shared their ideas and off-prints with me, for which I am very grateful. I would also like to thank Dr. Colmán Etchingham for his bibliography tips, and Unn Pedersen for providing me with the article on Woodstown. A special thank you goes to Zanette T. Glørstad for leading me to the Viking Age silver hoards and for supplying me with one of her articles. Many thanks go to Herdis Hølleland and Tale Marthe Dæhlen for proof-reading the final draft of the thesis. All the students at Blindernveien 11 deserve thanks for all the non-academic conversations in the lunch room, especially Anna Alexandra Myrer, Grethe Móell Pedersen, Gunnhild Wentzel, Maria Valum, Annette Solberg and Elise Naumann. Irish transplant Joanne Ó Sullivan also deserves credit. At last, I would like to thank my family and my good friends Suzanne Leidl and Anja Steinsland for all their support.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age Scotland: Scarf Panel Report
    Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Images ©as noted in the text ScARF Summary Iron Age Panel Document September 2012 Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Summary Iron Age Panel Report Fraser Hunter & Martin Carruthers (editors) With panel member contributions from Derek Alexander, Dave Cowley, Julia Cussans, Mairi Davies, Andrew Dunwell, Martin Goldberg, Strat Halliday, and Tessa Poller For contributions, images, feedback, critical comment and participation at workshops: Ian Armit, Julie Bond, David Breeze, Lindsey Büster, Ewan Campbell, Graeme Cavers, Anne Clarke, David Clarke, Murray Cook, Gemma Cruickshanks, John Cruse, Steve Dockrill, Jane Downes, Noel Fojut, Simon Gilmour, Dawn Gooney, Mark Hall, Dennis Harding, John Lawson, Stephanie Leith, Euan MacKie, Rod McCullagh, Dawn McLaren, Ann MacSween, Roger Mercer, Paul Murtagh, Brendan O’Connor, Rachel Pope, Rachel Reader, Tanja Romankiewicz, Daniel Sahlen, Niall Sharples, Gary Stratton, Richard Tipping, and Val Turner ii Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Executive Summary Why research Iron Age Scotland? The Scottish Iron Age provides rich data of international quality to link into broader, European-wide research questions, such as that from wetlands and the well-preserved and deeply-stratified settlement sites of the Atlantic zone, from crannog sites and from burnt-down buildings. The nature of domestic architecture, the movement of people and resources, the spread of ideas and the impact of Rome are examples of topics that can be explored using Scottish evidence. The period is therefore important for understanding later prehistoric society, both in Scotland and across Europe. There is a long tradition of research on which to build, stretching back to antiquarian work, which represents a considerable archival resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Loch Nan Deala Crannog - Archaeological Evaluation, October 2019
    Loch nan Deala Crannog - Archaeological Evaluation, October 2019 Crannogs are artificial islets constructed from timber, stone or a combination of materials. The earliest artificial stone islets we know of were constructed by the Early Neolithic settlers in the Western Isles almost 6000 years ago. In the Bronze Age raised timber structures and roundhouses were built on lochs in mainland Scotland and Ireland. In the Iron Age, some Hebridean crannogs become occupied by dry stone roundhouses of great complexity, including brochs and galleried duns. The ruins of these imposing structures were often reused in the later Iron Age and the Early Medieval period, although new crannogs may have also been built. In the Later Medieval times the islets become sites of castles, such as the one on Loch Gorm. At Finlaggan, a natural island of Eilean Mor and the adjacent artificial islet Eilean na Comhairle, occupied since the Iron Age, were developed into a unique political and spiritual centre of the Lords of the Isles. Several other known islet dwellings and crannogs on Islay are less well understood and their dating is either unsecure or completely unknown. Loch nan Deala crannog from the air during the excavation. (Drone photo by Mr Billy Stitchell) In early October Islay Heritage carried out archaeological evaluation at the site of a crannog in partly drained Loch nan Deala near Keills. This is the second time we come to this intriguing site having conducted detailed topographic and geophysical surveys in 2017 with the help of pupils and teachers from Keills and Small Isles Primary Schools as part of the Islay and Jura Primary School Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ARTIFICIAL ISLAND SE HIGHLAN INTH 7 25 D AREA. II. FURTHER ARTIFICIAE NOTETH N SO L ISLAND HIGHE TH N -SI LAND AREA REVY B . OD.F O BLUNDELL, F.S.A.Scoi. previoun I s years several artificial islands have been describey db me in papers to this Society: thus the Proceedings for the year 1908 contain the description of Eilean Muireach in Loch Ness ; notices of e islande Beaulth th n i sy Firth n Loci , h Bruiach, Loch Moy, Loch Garry, Loch Lundi, Loch Oich, Loch Lochy Locd an , h Trei cone gar - tained in the volume for 1909 ; while that for 1910 includes a notice of the island in Loch nan Eala, Arisaig. At this date, in order to continue and extend the investigation, e Britisth h Association appointe a dCommitte e wit0 hgrana £1 f o t to defray incidental expenses. With a view to ascertaining what islands were thought to be artificial by persons dwelling in the near neighbourhood, this Committee issued a circular, of which 450 copies were sen t e replieoutTh . s were both numerou d interestingan s , thoug somn hi e cases informatio s suppliewa n d whic d alreadha h y been publishe n Di dr Stuart's admirable article publishe y thib d s Society in 1865, or in other occasional papers published since that date. The present paper will, I trust, be found to contain only original information, though som bees eha n incorporate abridgen a n di d form in the Report of the British Association. It seems, however, especially fitting that all the information available should be placed before the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • An Iron Age Crannog in South-West Scotland: Underwater Survey and Excavation at Loch Arthur
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 141 (2011), 103–124 AN IRON AGE CRANNOG IN SOUTH-WEST SCOTLAND | 103 An Iron Age crannog in south-west Scotland: underwater survey and excavation at Loch Arthur Jon Henderson* and Graeme Cavers† ABSTRACT As part of the second phase of the South West Crannog Survey, the crannog in Loch Arthur, New Abbey, Dumfries and Galloway, was surveyed and small-scale excavations were carried out on submerged eroding deposits. The crannog was seen to be at threat from erosion for a number of reasons, including insect infestation, aquatic plants and wave action. The eroding deposits were sampled and their ecofactual content analysed and structural timbers from various positions in the crannog mound were radiocarbon dated. The results suggest that the site is a massive packwerk mound that was constructed in the second half of the 1st millennium BC, most likely in one event. After an apparent period of abandonment, the site was reoccupied in the later medieval period. INTRODUCTION crannogs generally, giving the study of the excavated deposits at Loch Arthur crannog Underwater survey, excavation and presented here an added importance in terms monitoring was conducted on an artificial of the overall development of crannog studies island or crannog in Loch Arthur from (Crone et al 2001). 2002 to 2004 as part of the second phase of the South West Scotland Crannog Survey (Henderson et al 2003; 2006). The work was H ISTORY OF RESEARCH conducted primarily to evaluate the condition and stability of the organic deposits surviving Loch Arthur is located in south-west on the site prior to the establishment of Scotland, in the parish of New Abbey an environmental monitoring programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochs and the Roman Occupation of Lowland Scotland* Lesley Macinnest
    Proc. Soc. Antiq Scot, 114 (1984), 235-249 Brochs and the Roman occupation of lowland Scotland* Lesley Macinnest SUMMARY This paper examines previous interpretations of lowland brocks, particularly the hypothesis that they were built mercenariesby from northern Scotland destroyedand during advancethe ofthe Roman mid-2nd armythe in century thisAD: view challengedis archaeologicalon grounds.An alternative approach understandingto these structures offered:is briefa examination anthropolo-of gical explanations of structural innovation suggests that the adoption of lowland brochs would have been keepingin with local architectural traditions. attemptAn thenis made considerto brochsthe contextthe in contemporaryof settlement, indicating that theyhavemay been architecturalone manifestation of wealth. The paper ends with a consideration of the significance of the brochs in understanding interrelationshipthe between nativethe population invadingthe and Roman forces,a relationship static whichnot altered but was with prevailing circumstances. INTRODUCTION Ther recurrina s ei g tendency among archaeologist seleco t s r discussiofo t e 'exoticanth t a ' e expens e th commonplacth f o e e (Clarke 1971). Thus, brochs have been single t froe dou m th general mas f settlemento s e Romano-Britisth f o s h perio n lowlani d d Scotland because they appeae exotib o t rc structure f limiteo s d distribution, intrusiv e usuath o elt form f domestio s c architectur e regionconsideo t th t n i e Ye . r these broch isolation i s removo t s ni e them froe mth contex whicn i t h they existerelation i d dan whico nt h they understoode havb o et e tendencTh . y to relate native settlement to the historically documented events of the Roman period has resulted in the appearance and decline of lowland brochs being explained solely within the context of Roman military activity in Scotland (MacKie 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Medieval Farmsteads
    COUNTRY Heritage NATIONAL MONUMENTS AN ROINN EALAÍON, OIDHREACHTA AGUS GAELTACHTA | DEPARTMENT OF ARTS, HERITAGE AND THE GAELTACHT Early medieval farmsteads uring the early me- dieval period (circa This is the latest in a series of articles from the National Monuments Service 500-1100AD), a large proportion of the farm- of the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht to introduce Farmers Ding community resided in ringforts. Journal readers to the archaeology of Ireland and to highlight the vital role The remains of these are found in large numbers in every county in of the farming community in preserving our heritage. Ireland and are known by various names, including fort, rath, dún and Pictures: © National Monuments Service Photographic Unit lios. Many of our townland names are derived from these ancient ringforts. Ringforts are usually circular, with a diameter of between 20 and 60 metres. They are deo ned by an earthen bank formed by material thrown up from a fosse or ditch im- mediately outside the bank. In more stony areas, particularly the West of Ireland, a large stone wall enclosed the farmstead instead of the ditch and bank; these are referred to as cashels or cahers. However, over the centuries the stones from many of these cashels have been taken for reuse in walls, roads and other structures. A small proportion of ringforts have two or more rings of protec- tive banks and ditches and these are believed to have belonged to the upper grades of society. The dwelling houses within these protected enclosures were generally circular thatched struc- tures with post and wattle walls and a central hearth sunken into the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Monuments.Pages
    Ancient Monuments of Scotland | Geoffrey Sammons | [email protected] | www.gaelicseattle.com • Heart of Neolithic Orkney • Maeshowe (~2800 BCE): chambered cairn and passage grave which is aligned so the chamber is illuminated on the winter solstice. It was vandalized by Vikings and contains the largest collection of runic writing in the world. • Standing Stones of Stenness (?): Possibly the oldest henge site in Britain and Ireland, this site has 4 stones Broch of Mousa ̤ remaining of what was thought to be 12 in an ellipse. • Ring of Brodgar (~2000 BCE): A henge which uniquely includes the 3rd largest stone circle in Britain and Ireland. • Skara Brae (3180 BCE to 2500 BCE): A cluster of 8 dwellings which constitute Europe’s most complete Neolithic village. Sometimes called the “Scottish Pompeii.” • Callanish Standing Stones (Lewis) • A neolithic stone circle (13 stones) with 5 rows of stones radiating out in a cross-like fashion. Two of the rows are parallel and much longer than the other 3. A chambered tomb, added later, can be found in the center. ̤ Heart of Neolithic Orkney • Kilmartin Glen (Argyll) • There are hundreds of ancient monuments (standing stones, a henge, burials, cairns) to be found within a six mile radius of Kilmartin village. The Kilmartin Museum Base map provides an excellent background for the history of the area (note: check with the museum for opening status as they are about to begin construction of a new facility). There are many pre-planned walks, with maps available, for ̤ Callanish Stones those of various abilities, who wish to see the sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back Moving Forward
    Scheme of Work Homes Through the Ages Skills / Concepts Activities Outcomes What needs are homes designed to meet? G Observing G Survey their own homes to Children discover that the G Looking for clues determine the type of basic needs are: G Recording and dwelling and extract the communicating data common factors G Shelter G Handling information G Security G Lighting G Warmth and cooking G Water supply and sanitation Be able to apply these criteria to any site Where are they sited? G Researching G Identifying and locating G Know why settlements G Explaining specific buildings and developed in particular sites on maps locations and how these G Studying the sites were affected by the topographical and availability of materials and geographical features of transport an area G Plotting routes used to G Locating quarries, limepits, transport materials brickworks G Investigating transport of materials How and why do homes change? G Observation of change Examine changes (and their G Know that the locality has G Hypothesising consequences) in: changed over time G Ordering G Plotting changes that have G Use of materials G Gathering evidence taken place on a timeline G Design and shape of G Noting and recording windows and doors change through decay and G Fashion changes weathering on brickwork, G Use of building stonework, carvings... G Adding modern comforts (plumbing, double glazing) G Structural modifications G Brickwork / stonework (e.g. lines of old arches and bricked up fireplaces) Examine the effects of weathering and pollution Key Stage
    [Show full text]