DOCSLIB.ORG

Julian's Afterlife. the Reception of a Roman Emperor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Julian's Afterlife. the Reception of a Roman Emperor _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien B2 voor dit chapter en dubbelklik nul hierna en zet 2 auteursnamen neer op die plek met and): 0 _full_articletitle_deel (kopregel rechts, vul hierna in): Julian’s Afterlife: The Reception of a Roman Emperor _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 398 Rebenich Chapter 13 Julian’s Afterlife. The Reception of a Roman Emperor Stefan Rebenich “Thou hast conquered, Galilean.” With these words on his lips the Roman em- peror Flavius Julianus, called Julian the Apostate, is said to have died in enemy territory on June 26th, 363 ad. The news of his death spread like wildfire. For some, a javelin thrown by a Saracen auxiliary in Persian service killed the mon- arch, for others it was the stroke of a sword of an unknown fighter that laid him low. Still others identifed a Christian hand, and a Byzantine chronographer believed that, at Christ’s behest, the holy Mercurius had slain the apostate.1 Perceptions of the emperor Julian were, and are, divided. While pagan intel- lectuals could mark a new era with the start of his rule, devout Christians rant- ed about the rabid dog and the stinking pig.2 Enlightened agnostics of the modern era transformed the enemy of the Cross into a shining proponent of their criticism of religion, and pious Catholics identified the persecutors of their period with the late Roman autocrat. Even our time knows ardent admir- ers and passionate opponents. On the one hand, Julian is the chief advocate for a global neo-paganism, which spreads its message on the internet, on the oth- er, he is a religious zealot, who failed in all respects. The following pages try to outline Julian’s Nachleben. This is a wide field, indeed. It should, however, be noted that I will not discuss his reception in the visual arts and music. But still I have to be both selective and reductive in my presentation and will explore the theme in five chapters. I will sketch various historical and literary portraits of Julian the Apostate, and reconstruct the trail of condemnation, reinterpretation, and glorification. These debates on the emperor illustrate moments of great importance in European intellectual his- tory. At the same time, Julian’s example highlights different modi of classical reception: deliberate disjunction, ostentatious spoliation, partial appropria- tion, and innovative transformation. 1 Cf. Theodoret, Church History 3.25.7; Ammianus 25.6.6; Libanius, Oration 18.272-75; Socrates, Church History 6.1.13; 6.2.2; Philostorgius, Church History 7.15a (= Artemii Passio 69) with Bleckmann/Stein, Philostorgius (→ iii.14), pp. 408-11; John Malalas, Chronicle 13, 23 Thurn. Still worth consulting is Büttner-Wobst, “Der Tod des Kaisers Julian” (→ i.15), pp. 561-80. 2 Ephraem, Hymns against Julian 2.1-9; 3.14-17; 4.9-10. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004416314_014 _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien B2 voor dit chapter en dubbelklik nul hierna en zet 2 auteursnamen neer op die plek met and): 0 _full_articletitle_deel (kopregel rechts, vul hierna in): Julian’s Afterlife: The Reception of a Roman Emperor _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 Julian’s Afterlife: The Reception of a Roman Emperor 399 1 Impiissimus imperator: Julian in the Middle Ages Christian and pagan dichotomies have characterized the perception of the em- peror since late antiquity. Medieval and Byzantine authors interpreted Roman history as an integral part of the Christian history of salvation. At the peak of Rome’s power, Christ had been born, and the Imperium Romanum was there- fore thought to be the fourth and final empire before the Last Judgement. Con- stantine – the first Christian emperor – gave favour to Christianity, and his reign symbolised the triumphant power of the word of God. Julian, on the other hand, represented a bad character who could, in the end, not resist the victory of the Church. His name was to be found in learned historiography, vernacular tales, ardent polemics, and tedious plays. In popular collections of saints’ lives like the Golden Legend (Legenda aurea) of James of Voragine (c.1230-98) Julian featured as the diabolic antagonist of the holy men. The interpretation of Julian’s life was defined by the Catholic Church. The wicked apostate was a tyrant and heretic, the archetypal foe of the holy Chris- tian community, the intimidating example of the evil, the pestilent temper of mankind, and the paradigmatic predecessor of all dissidents of the true faith. Iulianista became a term of abuse which was employed in ecclesiastical po- lemics and theological invectives. Not only by bishops: the pope himself ac- cused dissenting clerics and recalcitrant emperors of being followers of the apostate. Julian held a particularly prominent place in the long line of pagan and heretic miscreants, perhaps only surpassed by Nero.3 Medieval authors reproduced their earlier sources. They described Julian’s youth and his oppression by Constantius, mentioned both his classical and Christian education, recounted his actions as Caesar in Gaul and as Augustus in the eastern part of the Empire. Julian was charged with having feigned the true faith and proving an arrant liar. As cleric or lector, he read the Bible in Christian services while being secretly devoted to pagan superstition and ask- ing idolaters about the future. Again and again writers reproduced the story, found in the Historia tripartita (“Tripartite History”), that Julian concealed his apostasy by wearing a monk’s tonsure.4 After Constantius’ death he openly showed his hostility against the Church and tried to exterminate Christianity. Numerous martyr stories revealed the cruelty of Julian, the despot and per- secutor. Landolfus Sagax, a Lombard historian who wrote a Historia Romana, 3 Cf. Philip, Julianus Apostata in der deutschen Literatur (→ i.16), pp. 9-14; Rosen, Julian (→ i.2), pp. 408-12. 4 Cassiodorus [-Epiphanius], Historia ecclesiastica tripartita 6.1.12; cf. Socrates, Church History 3.1.19..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP of the GODS COULD SAVE the ROMAN EMPIRE from CHAOS a Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of
    WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP OF THE GODS COULD SAVE THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM CHAOS A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the Department of Humanities and Religious Studies California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Humanities by Alejandra Meléndez-Silva SPRING 2020 WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP OF THE GODS COULD SAVE THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM CHAOS A Thesis by Alejandra Meléndez-Silva Approved by: _________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Jeffrey Brodd _________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Bradley Nystrom __________________ Date ii Student: Alejandra Meléndez-Silva I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and this thesis is suitable for electronic submission to the library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. ___________________________, Graduate Coordinator _____________________ Dr. Harvey Stark Date Department of Humanities and Religious Studies iii Abstract of WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP OF THE GODS COULD SAVE THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM CHAOS by Alejandra Meléndez-Silva The Roman emperor Julian is famously remembered for being Rome’s last pagan emperor and he has been vilified for his dislike of Christianity. Sufficient analysis of Julian’s own perspective reveals a complex individual who does not conform with the simplified caricature of Julian “the Apostate” who was focused on assailing Christianity. His aversion to the Christians was mainly motivated by the fact that they refused to participate in the state cult. This thesis will explore the relationship between properly honoring the gods and state health, its origins, and why it was essential to sacrifice to the gods.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories Of
    ABSTRACT The Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret Scott A. Rushing, Ph.D. Mentor: Daniel H. Williams, Ph.D. This dissertation analyzes the transposition of the apostolic tradition in the fifth-century ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret. In the early patristic era, the apostolic tradition was defined as the transmission of the apostles’ teachings through the forms of Scripture, the rule of faith, and episcopal succession. Early Christians, e.g., Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen, believed that these channels preserved the original apostolic doctrines, and that the Church had faithfully handed them to successive generations. The Greek historians located the quintessence of the apostolic tradition through these traditional channels. However, the content of the tradition became transposed as a result of three historical movements during the fourth century: (1) Constantine inaugurated an era of Christian emperors, (2) the Council of Nicaea promulgated a creed in 325 A.D., and (3) monasticism emerged as a counter-cultural movement. Due to the confluence of these sweeping historical developments, the historians assumed the Nicene creed, the monastics, and Christian emperors into their taxonomy of the apostolic tradition. For reasons that crystallize long after Nicaea, the historians concluded that pro-Nicene theology epitomized the apostolic message. They accepted the introduction of new vocabulary, e.g. homoousios, as the standard of orthodoxy. In addition, the historians commended the pro- Nicene monastics and emperors as orthodox exemplars responsible for defending the apostolic tradition against the attacks of heretical enemies. The second chapter of this dissertation surveys the development of the apostolic tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University
    Boise State University ScholarWorks History Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of History 1-1-2007 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University Publication Information Odahl, Charles Matson. (2007). "Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy". Connections: European Studies Annual Review, 3, 89-113. This document was originally published in Connections: European Studies Annual Review by Rocky Mountain European Scholars Consortium. Copyright restrictions may apply. Coda: Recovering Constantine's European Legacy 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl, Boise State University1 rom his Christian conversion under the influence of cept of imperial theocracy was conveyed in contemporary art Frevelatory experiences outside Rome in A.D. 312 until (Illustration I). his burial as the thirteenth Apostle at Constantinople in Although Constantine had been raised as a tolerant 337, Constantine the Great, pagan polytheist and had the first Christian emperor propagated several Olympian of the Roman world, initiated divinities, particularly Jupiter, the role of and set the model Hercules, Mars, and Sol, as for Christian imperial theoc­ di vine patrons during the early racy. Through his relationship years of his reign as emperor
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character
    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character J. Steven Davis Submitted to Dr. Jerry Sutton School of Divinity Liberty University September 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Research Proposal Abstract .............................................................................................................................11 Background ......................................................................................................................11 Limitations ........................................................................................................................18 Method of Research .........................................................................................................19 Thesis Statement ..............................................................................................................21 Outline ...............................................................................................................................21 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Background of Athanasius An Influential Figure .......................................................................................................33 Early Life ..........................................................................................................................33 Arian Conflict ...................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • The Pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (2009 -) Projects Fire in the Bread, Life in the Body: The Pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian David Kiger Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Kiger, David, "Fire in the Bread, Life in the Body: The Pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian" (2020). Dissertations (2009 -). 913. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/913 FIRE IN THE BREAD, LIFE IN THE BODY: THE PNEUMATOLOGY OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN by David Wesley Kiger, B.C.M, B.Th., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2020 ABSTRACT FIRE IN THE BREAD, LIFE IN THE BODY: THE PNEUMATOLOGY OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN David Wesley Kiger, B.C.M., B.Th., M.Div. Marquette University, 2020 The fourth century debates about the status and personhood of the Son later expanded to reflections on the status and person of the Holy Spirit. In this dissertation I examine the pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian, who is often over-looked in discussions about fourth century pneumatology. I argue that Ephrem displays a high pneumatology that fits within the broad contours of the pro-Nicene movement. I begin with a discussion of Ephrem’s Syriac heritage and focus on the themes and language surrounding the Holy Spirit in pre-Nicene Syriac texts. Pre-Nicene Syriac authors speak about the Spirit’s role in liturgical practices, often using feminine or maternal language to describe the Spirit’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template
    RECLAIMING THE NON-NICENE PAST: THEOPHILUS THE INDIAN AND ULFILA THE GOTH AS MISSIONARY HEROES By ANNA LANKINA A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Anna Lankina 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The various and numerous people who make it possible for one human being to pursue research and writing in history all contribute special and unique gifts essential to the success of such an undertaking. For equipping me so well for the challenges of graduate school, I wish to gratefully acknowledge the faculty and community of Hillsdale College. Specifically, for revealing to me the wonder that is the world of Late Antiquity and for his perseverance through the supervision of my honor’s thesis, I would like to wholeheartedly thank Professor Harold A. Siegel. For her excellent Greek and Latin teaching abilities and for her delightful friendship, I would also like to thank Dr. Lorna Holmes. I am immensely thankful to all the members of my family, who, despite being scattered over multiple continents and many cities, have always eagerly desired my success and cheered me on. In particular, the support and encouragement of Marilee Harris, Olga Dimchevskaya, Rada Lankina, my father Vladimir Lankin, and my mother Natasha Lankina was and is indispensable. My husband Jasper has persistently sought out each and every way of helping me achieve my goals, down to the final draft; for that and many other things I am tremendously grateful. My indebtedness to the members of my graduate committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Arianism and Political Power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic Kingdoms
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2012 Reign of heretics: Arianism and political power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic kingdoms Christopher J. (Christopher James) Nofziger Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Nofziger, Christopher J. (Christopher James), "Reign of heretics: Arianism and political power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic kingdoms" (2012). WWU Graduate School Collection. 244. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/244 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reign of Heretics: Arianism and Political Power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic Kingdoms By Christopher James Nofziger Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School Advisory Committee Chair, Dr. Peter Diehl Dr. Amanda Eurich Dr. Sean Murphy MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non- exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files.
    [Show full text]
  • Philostorgius' Ecclesiastical History: an 'Alternative Ideology'
    Tyndale Bulletin 42.2 (Nov. 1991) 271-281. PHILOSTORGIUS' ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY: AN 'ALTERNATIVE IDEOLOGY' Alanna M. Nobbs The genre of ecclesiastical history, started by Eusebius, flourished particularly in the Greek-speaking areas of the Roman Empire from the fourth to the sixth centuries. Its leading practitioners after Eusebius are held to be Socrates, Sozomen and Theodoret, all writing (more or less) from an 'orthodox' standpoint, and all three fortunate so far as their reputation has been concerned because their ecclesiastical histories have come down intact, or almost so. While modern scholars by no means accept all their assertions and conclusions, theirs is the overall view of Church history which has prevailed. Yet a tantalising glimpse of an 'alternative ideology',1 which might have prevailed had the Athanasian party not triumphed over the Arians, has been preserved tenuously in the fragments of the historian Philostorgius, who wrote probably shortly before Socrates, Sozomen and Theodoret and from an Eunomian, or neo-Arian standpoint. When he wrote, probably in the early 430s, the genre of ecclesiastical history was still developing,2 and Eusebius, branded even in his own day and certainly afterwards as an Arian sympathiser was the model for Philostorgius, a model which he adapted, as will be shown, to give his History its individual stamp. In order to understand the nature of Philostorgius' work, and how he contributed his own slant to the development of ________________________ 1 The phrase is used by Peter Heather & John Matthews, The Goths in the Fourth Century (Liverpool, 1991), 133. I am grateful for being shown the text in advance of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus – the Ecclesiastical History
    0450-0450 – Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus – The Ecclesiastical History The Ecclesiastical History, comprising a History of the Church, from A.D. 323 to A.D. 425 this file has been downloaded from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf202.html NPNF (V2-02) Socrates Scholasticus THE 179 ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF SOZOMEN, COMPRISING A HISTORY OF THE CHURCH, FROM A.D. 323 TO A.D. 425. TRANSLATED FROM THE GREEK. Revised by CHESTER D. HARTRANFT, HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. 191 Introduction. ———————————— Salaminius Hermias Sozomen ———————————— Part I.—The Life. 326 NPNF (V2-02) Socrates Scholasticus The name is an unusual and difficult one. It seems desirable to give preference to the order which Photius adopts, but to preserve the spelling in Nicephorus Callistus, and in the captions of the chief manuscripts, and therefore to call him Salaminius Hermias Sozomen. What the term Salaminius indicates, cannot yet be accurately determined. There are no data to show any official connection of Sozomen with Salamis opposite Athens, or Salamis (Constantia) in Cyprus; certainly there is no record of any naval service. In vi. 32, where he speaks of the greater lights of monasticism in Palestine, Hilarion, Hesychas, and Epiphanius, he remarks, “At the same period in the monasteries, Salamines, Phuscon, Malachion, Crispion, four brethren, were highly distinguished.” In the tart controversy between Epiphanius and the empress, the latter had said, “You have not power to revive the dead; otherwise your archdeacon would not have died.” Sozomen explains, “She alluded to Crispion, the archdeacon, who had died a short time previously; he was brother to Phuscon and Salamanus, monks whom I had occasion to mention when detailing the history of events under the reign of Valens” (viii.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eunomian (Anomean) Church in the Christian Roman Empire
    ELECTRUM ♦ Vol. 8 Kraków 2004 Michal Stachura The Eunomian (Anomean) Church in the Christian Roman Empire Already in Antiquity, Christian writers observed that, for centuries heresies and fac­ tions plagued the Church irresistibly.1 This does not mean that the Church was prepared to tolerate the existence of numerous heretical and schismatic churches vying with it for rights to the Christian heritage. Church fathers wasted no opportunity to fight them and, once the congregation included a Christian emperor, he too felt obliged to join in the struggle against heresy with the means at his disposal. Christian Roman emperors sub­ mitted to the guidance of bishops’ assemblies with remarkable humility when they re­ frained from making suggestions as to who was or was not a heretic (they displayed less humble attitudes when pressuring the same assemblies to pursue Church unity, which often involved dogmatic or disciplinary decisions).2 Their laws were targeted against existing heretical and schismatic communities, aiming at thwarting their actions and separating them from the “healthy” part of society.3 Thus a group of bishops who tried to advance a doctrine believed by others to be heretical faced twofold repressive measures. As long as they were formal members of the state-recognized Church, the emperor did his best to restore unity, particularly by isolating potential factional leaders from the faithful at large. A typical measure was to exile a disobedient bishop, usually following his deposition by a synod (in this way the state was virtually executing a synod decision). If a dissident group - following removal from the Church or preempting such a decision - decided to create its own ecclesiastical organization, it came under anti-heresy laws which, from the reign of Constantine 1 This is hinted at even in St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Medallion of Constantius II Julia Ruff Lawrence University
    Lawrence University Lux Lawrence University Honors Projects 2005 A Medallion of Constantius II Julia Ruff Lawrence University Follow this and additional works at: https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp Part of the Byzantine and Modern Greek Commons © Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Recommended Citation Ruff, Julia, "A Medallion of Constantius II" (2005). Lawrence University Honors Projects. 70. https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp/70 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Lux. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lawrence University Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Lux. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This honors these submitted by Julia Ruff has been read and found acceptable for Honors in Independent Study Randall McNeill, Member of the Examinin~ Committee Je#ld Podair, Member of the Examining Committee Carol Lawton, Thesis Adviser A MEDALLION OF CONSTANTIUS II Julia Ruff TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 Introduction 2-3 The Sources 4 Historical Background 4-9 Ammianus Marcellinus 9-12 Reign of Constantius II 13-18 Medallions: Definition 18-19 Medallions: Occasions for Minting 19-22 Medallions: Intended Recipients 23-27 Description of the Medallion 28 Obverse 28-33 Reverse 34-39 Medallions: Production 39-45 The Messages of the Medallion of Constantius 45-50 Conclusions 50-51 Figure 1 52 Figure 2 53 Figure 3 54 Figure 4 55 Figure 5 56 Figure 6 57 Figure 7 58 Figure 8 59 Figure 9 60 Bibliography 61-62 ( 1 ( PREFACE I would like to acknowledge those individuals who have helped to make this work possible.
    [Show full text]