Central African Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central African Republic WT/TPR/S/285 • CAR - 306 - ANNEX 4 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC WT/TPR/S/285 • CAR - 307 - CONTENTS 1 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................... 310 1.1 Main features ......................................................................................................... 310 1.2 Recent Economic Trends .......................................................................................... 311 1.3 Trade and investment trend ..................................................................................... 312 1.4 Outlook ................................................................................................................. 315 2 TRADE AND INVESTMENT REGIMES ......................................................................... 316 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................... 316 2.2 Trade policy objectives ............................................................................................ 319 2.3 Trade agreements and arrangements ........................................................................ 319 2.3.1 World Trade Organisation ...................................................................................... 319 2.3.2 Relations with the European Union (EU) .................................................................. 320 2.3.3 Other agreements and arrangements ...................................................................... 320 2.4 Investment Regime ................................................................................................ 321 2.4.1 Settlement of investment-related disputes ............................................................... 324 3 TRADE POLICIES AND PRACTICES BY MEASURE ...................................................... 325 3.1 Measures directly affecting imports ........................................................................... 325 3.1.1 Registration ........................................................................................................ 325 3.1.2 Preshipment inspection ......................................................................................... 326 3.1.3 Customs procedures ............................................................................................. 327 3.1.4 Rules of origin ..................................................................................................... 328 3.1.5 Customs levies .................................................................................................... 328 3.1.6 Internal taxes ..................................................................................................... 330 3.1.7 Tariff preferences ................................................................................................ 331 3.1.8 Duty and tax concessions ...................................................................................... 331 3.1.9 Prohibitions, quantitative restrictions and licences .................................................... 332 3.1.10 Standards, technical regulations and accreditation .................................................. 333 3.1.11 Packaging, marking and labelling requirements ...................................................... 333 3.1.12 Sanitary and phytosanitary measures ................................................................... 334 3.1.13 Contingency measures ........................................................................................ 334 3.1.14 Other measures ................................................................................................. 334 3.2 Measures directly affecting exports ........................................................................... 335 3.2.1 Registration and customs procedures ...................................................................... 335 3.2.2 Export duties and taxes ........................................................................................ 335 3.2.3 Export prohibitions and controls ............................................................................. 336 3.2.4 Export subsidies and promotion ............................................................................. 336 3.3 Measures affecting production and trade .................................................................... 336 3.3.1 Incentives .......................................................................................................... 336 WT/TPR/S/285 • CAR - 308 - 3.3.2 Competition and price control ................................................................................ 336 3.3.3 State trading, State-owned enterprises and privatization ........................................... 337 3.3.4 Government procurement ..................................................................................... 337 3.3.5 Protection of intellectual property rights .................................................................. 338 4 TRADE POLICY BY SECTOR ...................................................................................... 340 4.1 Agriculture, livestock farming, forestry and fisheries .................................................... 340 4.1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................ 340 4.1.2 Agricultural policies .............................................................................................. 342 4.1.3 Policy by subsector .............................................................................................. 342 4.1.4 Forestry ............................................................................................................. 348 4.2 Mining and Energy .................................................................................................. 350 4.2.1 Mining products ................................................................................................... 351 4.2.2 Petroleum products .............................................................................................. 353 4.3 Manufacturing sector .............................................................................................. 356 4.4 Services ................................................................................................................ 357 4.4.1 Transport services ............................................................................................... 358 4.4.2 Telecommunications services ................................................................................. 361 4.4.3 Postal services .................................................................................................... 363 4.4.4 Financial services ................................................................................................. 363 4.4.5 Professional and business services ......................................................................... 364 4.4.6 Tourism .............................................................................................................. 366 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 367 CHARTS Chart 1.1 Structure of trade in goods, 2005 and 2011 ......................................................... 313 Chart 1.2 Direction of trade in goods, 2005 and 2011 ......................................................... 314 Chart 4.1 Main budget items 2012, by chapter ................................................................... 341 Chart 4.2 Diamond exports and prices, 2005-2011 ............................................................. 351 Chart 4.3 Air transport, 2003-2011 .................................................................................. 358 TABLES Table 1.1 Basic economic indicators, 2005-2012 ................................................................. 310 Table 1.2 Balance of payments, 2005-2011 ....................................................................... 312 Table 2.1 Principal trade-related laws and regulations, March 2013 ....................................... 317 Table 2.2 Number of authorizations granted and investments planned, 2006-2012 .................. 322 Table 2.3 Formalities and fees associated with business start-ups ......................................... 323 WT/TPR/S/285 • CAR - 309 - Table 3.1 Number of registrations for engaging in import-export trade, 2008-2012 ................. 325 Table 3.2 Fiscal revenue by main source, 2007-2012 .......................................................... 329 Table 3.3 Breakdown of revenue losses owing to exemptions, 2009-2012 .............................. 331 Table 3.4 Import controls, 2012 ....................................................................................... 333 Table 3.5 Number of applications, by year and by type of title, filed with the SNL from the Central African Republic, 2006-2012 ................................................................................. 338 Table 4.1 Production of food crops, 2000, 2005-2010 .......................................................... 340 Table 4.2 Palm oil production and trade indicators, 2000, 2005-2010 .................................... 346 Table 4.3 Production and export of timber, 2000, 2005, 2008-2011 ...................................... 348 Table 4.4 Electricity rates since February 2006 ................................................................... 355 Table 4.5 Mobile
Recommended publications
  • Clinical Outcome of Skin Yaws Lesions After Treatment with Benzathinebenzylpenicillin in a Pygmy Population in Lobaye, Central A
    Manirakiza et al. BMC Research Notes 2011, 4:543 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/4/543 SHORT REPORT Open Access Clinical outcome of skin yaws lesions after treatment with benzathinebenzylpenicillin in a pygmy population in Lobaye, Central African Republic Alexandre Manirakiza1*, Susana Vilas Boas2, Narcisse Beyam3, Germain Zadanga1, François Xavier Konamna1, Siméon P Njuimo1 and Rémi Laganier1 Abstract Background: Yaws is a bacterial skin and bone infectious disease caused by Treponema pallidum pertenue.Itis endemic, particularly among pygmies in Central African Republic. To assess the clinical cure rate after treatment with benzathinepenicillin in this population, we conducted a cohort survey of 243 patients in the Lobaye region. Findings and conclusion: The rate of healing of lesions after 5 months was 95.9%. This relatively satisfactory level of therapeutic response implies that yaws could be controlled in the Central African Republic. Thus, reinforcement of the management of new cases and of contacts is suggested. Keywords: Yaws, Treatment, Central African Republic Background Painful palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and keratoderma Yaws is a skin and bone non-venereal treponematosis are also observed during this third stage. caused by Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue.Itis Basically, the diagnosis of an infection by Treponema not considered a neglected disease, but a forgotten one pertenue is based on three criteria,(i) the emergence of [1,2]. Most infected people reside in warm, humid tropi- the disease in an endemic region, (ii) clinically typical cal areas, in communities with lack of hygiene [3]. The papilloma lesions, and (iii) seroactivity in a treponemal usual means of transmission of yaws is close bodily con- antigen test [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Filing After US Patent Application
    Invention-Con 2017 - International 2 Protection - Patents International Protection: Patents Presented By: Robin Hylton Session on International Protection: Patents • Patent Protection Outside the United States • Paris Convention Basics • Patent Cooperation Treaty Basics • Global Dossier at the USPTO Invention-Con 2017 - International 4 Protection - Patents Patent Protection Outside the United States Invention-Con 2017 - International 5 Protection - Patents Foreign Patent Protection • Patent protection can be an important part of overall business strategy in today’s global marketplace • In general, patent rights are territorial in nature • Protect against infringing activities occurring within the country or region in which the patent was granted • To obtain patent rights in foreign countries, U.S. applicants must apply for a patent in each country or region of interest • A world-wide patent does not exist Invention-Con 2017 - International 6 Protection - Patents Business Considerations in Filing Foreign Patent Applications • Business considerations • Exclusive rights • Return on investment • Opportunity to license or sell the invention • Increase in negotiating power • Positive image for business • Patent procurement and maintenance costs • In 2002, GAO estimated costs of between $160,000 to $330,000 for obtaining and maintaining patents in 9 countries • France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, Sweden, United Kingdom, • Canada, Japan, & South Korea Invention-Con 2017 - International 7 Protection - Patents Legal Considerations in Filing Foreign Patent Applications • Patent law considerations • Standards of patentability in country/region • Patentable subject matter differences • Prior art differences • Grace periods • Geographical restrictions • First-to-file • Utility model protection • Patent enforcement laws • Does the country/region have effective laws and procedures for enforcing the patent? Invention-Con 2017 - International 8 Protection - Patents Who Grants Patents? • National patent offices • E.g., USPTO, JPO, KIPO, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Questions About Patents and Utility Models If You Have an Patents Or Utility Models, Register It
    6 Basic Questions about Patents and Utility Models If you have an patents or utility models, register it. The purpose of this brochure is to present frequently asked questions and their answers regarding Patents and Utility Models. 5 major areas The topics have been grouped into five major areas: 01. Purpose and duration 02. Procedure 03. Ownership and transfer 04. Searches 05. Protection abroad Patent owners must descri- be their inventions so that a normal expert in the field may process them. 01 Purpose and duration 1. What is a patent? What is a utility model? Patent and the utility models are titles granted by the State that give inventors the exclu- sive right to temporarily prevent others from manufacturing, selling or making commercial use of the protected invention in Spain. 2. What are the main obligations of a patent or utility model rights holder? In exchange for a monopoly over commercial use, rights holders are obliged to describe their inventions so that a normal expert in the field may duly process them. They have the further obligation to commercialize the patent or utility model, either directly or through a person they authorize to do so. 3. Is it compulsory to commercialize a patent or utility model? Patent holders are obliged to commercialize inventions directly or through a person they authorize, commercializing them in Spain or in a member state of the World Trade Organ- ization. Such commercialization must be carried out within a period of four years from the date of submission of the patent application, or three years from the date of publication of its granting (whichever expires later).
    [Show full text]
  • La République Centrafricaine De L'authentique Panafricaniste
    RÉPONSE À LA LETTRE OUVERTE DES ORGANISATIONS « DIAPORA AFRICAINE EN EUROPE » ET « GROUPE AGIR EUROPE-AFRIQUE » La République Centrafricaine de l’authentique panafricaniste Barthélémy Boganda n’est pas votre marchepied. Le 7 janvier 2021 _____ Depuis plusieurs années, la République centrafricaine est devenue le repaire d’une nouvelle race de prédateurs : les prédateurs sous-couvert de panafricanisme. Des personnages qui présentent les mêmes caractéristiques générales s’y pavanent avec arrogance : souvent méconnus au bataillon dans leurs propres pays, présentant des capacités incertaines, dépourvus de tout passé et de tout arrière-plan de lutte, invités de luxe du pouvoir à Bangui, ils sont passés maîtres dans l’art peu glorieux de la production stéréotypée d’un discours servile cynique grassement rémunéré. Nous avons jusqu’à présent supporté leurs logorrhées et leurs récitations aussi grotesques qu’injurieuses. À présent, cela suffit ! À eux tous, moi, Jean-François AKANDJI-KOMBÉ, citoyen centrafricain et fier de l’être, je dis aujourd’hui : Vous êtes une insulte à la mémoire panafricaniste de notre père fondateur, Barthélémy BOGANDA, ainsi qu’à celle des pères et mères du panafricanisme ; une injure permanente à l’intelligence des centrafricains. Nous, centrafricains, nous nous souviendrons que vous avez délibérément choisi d’être une part du problème qui gangrène notre pays, parce que ce problème vous nourrit. Aux initiateurs de la lettre à laquelle j’ai décidé de répondre aujourd’hui, je dis ceci. Vous avez décidé d’en découdre avec les candidats et les partis de l’opposition démocratique de notre pays, à nous les Centrafricains. Il leur revient de vous répondre sur le fond et je les exhorte à le faire.
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Rep.: Sub-Prefectures 09 Jun 2015
    Central African Rep.: Sub-Prefectures 09 Jun 2015 NIGERIA Maroua SUDAN Birao Birao Abyei REP. OF Garoua CHAD Ouanda-Djallé Ouanda-Djalle Ndélé Ndele Ouadda Ouadda Kabo Bamingui SOUTH Markounda Kabo Ngaounday Bamingui SUDAN Markounda CAMEROON Djakon Mbodo Dompta Batangafo Yalinga Goundjel Ndip Ngaoundaye Boguila Batangafo Belel Yamba Paoua Nangha Kaga-Bandoro Digou Bocaranga Nana-Bakassa Borgop Yarmbang Boguila Mbrès Nyambaka Adamou Djohong Ouro-Adde Koui Nana-Bakassa Kaga-Bandoro Dakere Babongo Ngaoui Koui Mboula Mbarang Fada Djohong Garga Pela Bocaranga MbrÞs Bria Djéma Ngam Bigoro Garga Bria Meiganga Alhamdou Bouca Bakala Ippy Yalinga Simi Libona Ngazi Meidougou Bagodo Bozoum Dekoa Goro Ippy Dir Kounde Gadi Lokoti Bozoum Bouca Gbatoua Gbatoua Bakala Foulbe Dékoa Godole Mala Mbale Bossangoa Djema Bindiba Dang Mbonga Bouar Gado Bossemtélé Rafai Patou Garoua-BoulaiBadzere Baboua Bouar Mborguene Baoro Sibut Grimari Bambari Bakouma Yokosire Baboua Bossemptele Sibut Grimari Betare Mombal Bogangolo Bambari Ndokayo Nandoungue Yaloké Bakouma Oya Zémio Sodenou Zembe Baoro Bogangolo Obo Bambouti Ndanga Abba Yaloke Obo Borongo Bossembele Ndjoukou Bambouti Woumbou Mingala Gandima Garga Abba Bossembélé Djoukou Guiwa Sarali Ouli Tocktoyo Mingala Kouango Alindao Yangamo Carnot Damara Kouango Bangassou Rafa´ Zemio Zémio Samba Kette Gadzi Boali Damara Alindao Roma Carnot Boulembe Mboumama Bedobo Amada-Gaza Gadzi Bangassou Adinkol Boubara Amada-Gaza Boganangone Boali Gambo Mandjou Boganangone Kembe Gbakim Gamboula Zangba Gambo Belebina Bombe Kembé Ouango
    [Show full text]
  • Income Hiding and Informal Redistribution: a Lab-In-The-Field Experiment in Senegal
    Income Hiding and Informal Redistribution: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Senegal Marie Boltz,∗ Joint with Karine Marazyan,† Paola Villar‡ § Job Market Paper November, 2015 - Latest version here Abstract This paper estimates the hidden cost of informal redistribution in economies where people heavily rely on their social networks and have limited access to financial markets. It is based on a lab-in-the- field experiment conducted in Senegal which uniquely combines a small-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a lab experiment. The lab component allows us to estimate the cost of this informal redistribution, by eliciting the willingness-to-pay to hide income, and to identify the relevant popu- lation: two-thirds of the experiment participants are ready to forgo up to 14% of their gains to keep them private. Based on the RCT component, we find that giving people fearing the redistributive pressure the opportunity to hide allows them to decrease by 27% the share of gains they to kin as measured out of the lab. They reallocate this extra money to health and personal expenses. This is the first paper to both identify the individual cost of this informal redistribution and to relate it to real-life resource-allocation decisions in a controlled setting. JEL Classification: D13, D14, D31, C91, C93, O12 Keywords: informal redistribution, income observability, intra-family resource allocations, lab experiment in the field, Sub-Saharan Africa. ∗Paris School of Economics (PSE); Address: PSE, bureau A113, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris; e-mail: [email protected] †University of Paris 1 - IEDES - UMR “Developpement et Societes” ‡Institut National d’Etudes Demographiques (INED), Paris School of Economics (PSE) §The authors are thankful to the CEPREMAP, the PSE Research Fund, the Sarah Andrieux Fund, the Chair G-Mond, the IRD, and the UMR Développement et Société, for their financial support for this research project.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUSCA T a Ou M L B U a a O L H R a R S H Birao E a L April 2016 R B Al Fifi 'A 10 H R 10 ° a a ° B B C H a VAKAGA R I CHAD
    14° 16° 18° 20° 22° 24° 26° ZAMBIA Am Timan é Aoukal SUDAN MINUSCA t a ou m l B u a a O l h a r r S h Birao e a l April 2016 r B Al Fifi 'A 10 h r 10 ° a a ° B b C h a VAKAGA r i CHAD Sarh Garba The boundaries and names shown ouk ahr A Ouanda and the designations used on this B Djallé map do not imply official endorsement Doba HQ Sector Center or acceptance by the United Nations. CENTRAL AFRICAN Sam Ouandja Ndélé K REPUBLIC Maïkouma PAKISTAN o t t SOUTH BAMINGUI HQ Sector East o BANGORAN 8 BANGLADESH Kaouadja 8° ° SUDAN Goré i MOROCCO u a g n i n i Kabo n BANGLADESH i V i u HAUTE-KOTTO b b g BENIN i Markounda i Bamingui n r r i Sector G Batangafo G PAKISTAN m Paoua a CAMBODIA HQ Sector West B EAST CAMEROON Kaga Bandoro Yangalia RWANDA CENTRAL AFRICAN BANGLADESH m a NANA Mbrès h OUAKA REPUBLIC OUHAM u GRÉBIZI HAUT- O ka Bria Yalinga Bossangoa o NIGER -PENDÉ a k MBOMOU Bouca u n Dékoa MAURITANIA i O h Bozoum C FPU CAMEROON 1 OUHAM Ippy i 6 BURUNDI Sector r Djéma 6 ° a ° Bambari b ra Bouar CENTER M Ouar Baoro Sector Sibut Baboua Grimari Bakouma NANA-MAMBÉRÉ KÉMO- BASSE MBOMOU M WEST Obo a Yaloke KOTTO m Bossembélé GRIBINGUI M b angúi bo er ub FPU BURUNDI 1 mo e OMBELLA-MPOKOYaloke Zémio u O Rafaï Boali Kouango Carnot L Bangassou o FPU BURUNDI 2 MAMBÉRÉ b a y -KADEI CONGO e Bangui Boda FPU CAMEROON 2 Berberati Ouango JTB Joint Task Force Bangui LOBAYE i Gamboula FORCE HQ FPU CONGO Miltary Observer Position 4 Kade HQ EGYPT 4° ° Mbaïki Uele National Capital SANGHA Bondo Mongoumba JTB INDONESIA FPU MAURITANIA Préfecture Capital Yokadouma Tomori Nola Town, Village DEMOCRATICDEMOCRATIC Major Airport MBAÉRÉ UNPOL PAKISTAN PSU RWANDA REPUBLICREPUBLIC International Boundary Salo i Titule g Undetermined Boundary* CONGO n EGYPT PERU OFOF THE THE CONGO CONGO a FPU RWANDA 1 a Préfecture Boundary h b g CAMEROON U Buta n GABON SENEGAL a gala FPU RWANDA 2 S n o M * Final boundary between the Republic RWANDA SERBIA Bumba of the Sudan and the Republic of South 0 50 100 150 200 250 km FPU SENEGAL Sudan has not yet been determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Sector Reform in the Central African Republic
    Security Sector Reform in the Central African Republic: Challenges and Priorities High-level dialogue on building support for key SSR priorities in the Central African Republic, 21-22 June 2016 Cover Photo: High-level dialogue on SSR in the CAR at the United Nations headquarters on 21 June 2016. Panellists in the center of the photograph from left to right: Adedeji Ebo, Chief, SSRU/OROLSI/DPKO; Jean Willybiro-Sako, Special Minister-Counsellor to the President of the Central African Republic for DDR/SSR and National Reconciliation; Miroslav Lajčák, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic; Joseph Yakété, Minister of Defence of Central African Republic; Mr. Parfait Onanga-Anyanga, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for the Central African Republic and Head of MINUSCA. Photo: Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic The report was produced by the Security Sector Reform Unit, Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, United Nations. © United Nations Security Sector Reform Unit, 2016 Map of the Central African Republic 14° 16° 18° 20° 22° 24° 26° AmAm Timan Timan The boundaries and names shown and the designations é oukal used on this map do not implay official endorsement or CENTRAL AFRICAN A acceptance by the United Nations. t a SUDAN lou REPUBLIC m u B a a l O h a r r S h Birao e a l r B Al Fifi 'A 10 10 h r ° a a ° B b C h a VAKAGA r i CHAD Sarh k Garba Sarh Bahr Aou CENTRAL Ouanda AFRICAN Djallé REPUBLIC Doba BAMINGUI-BANGORAN Sam
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Republic: Population Displacement January 2012
    Central African Republic: Population Displacement January 2012 94,386 internally displaced persons (IDPs) in 5,652 the Central African Republic (CAR), where close SUDAN 24,951 65,364 Central to 21,500 were newly displaced in 2012 1,429 African refugees 71,601 returnees from within CAR or Birao neighboring countries 12,820 CHAD 6,880 6,516 Vakaga 19,867 refugees from Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo and 225 11,967 asylum-seekers of varying nationalities reside in Ouanda- the CAR and 152,861 Central African refugees 12,428 Djallé Ndélé are living in neighboring countries 3,827 543 Bamingui- 85,092 Central 7,500 Bangoran African refugees 8,736 1,500 2,525 Kabo 812 Ouadda 5,208 SOUTH SUDAN Markounda Bamingui Haute-Kotto Ngaoundaye 500 3,300 Batangafo Kaga- Haut- Paoua Bandoro Mbomou Nana- Nana-Gribizi Koui Boguila 20 6,736 Bria Bocaranga Ouham Ouham Ouaka 5,517 Djéma 1,033 Central 2,3181,964 5,615 African refugees 3,000 Pendé 3,287 2,074 1,507 128 Bossemtélé Kémo Bambari 1,226 Mbomou 800 Baboua Obo Zémio Ombella M'Poko 1,674 Rafaï Nana-Mambéré 5,564 Bakouma Bambouti CAMEROON 6,978 Basse- Bangassou Kotto Mambéré-Kadéï Bangui Lobaye Returnees Mongoumba Internally displaced persons (IDPs) 1,372 Central Refugees Sangha- African refugees Figures by sub-prefecture Mbaéré Returnee DEMOCRATIC movement REPUBLIC OF THE IDP camp IDP CONGO CONGO Refugee camp Refugee 0 50 100 km Sources: Various sources compiled by OCHA CAR Due to diculty in tracking spontaneous returns, breakdown of refugee returnees and IDP returnees is not available at the sub-prefectural level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Utility Model Patent Systems in Europe and China
    Creating a “model” utility model patent system A comparative analysis of the utility model patent systems in Europe and China WWW. IPKEY.ORG Creating a “model” utility model patent system: A comparative analysis of the utility model patent systems in Europe and China Dan Prud’homme December 2014 Abstract: Although it is difficult to create an optimal “model” of the exact types of every aspect of every country’s utility model patent system, this study illustrates that it is possible to create a useful legal, policy, and institutional framework based upon an understanding of the statutory, procedural, and institutional composition of utility model systems in Austria, China, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, and Italy; reasons behind the composition, including any revisions to, these systems; and usage of the systems. It also briefly discusses relevant experiences of Belgium and the Netherlands. Keywords: utility model patent systems, comparative analysis, Europe, China, substantive law, procedural law, institutions, patent quality, innovation ABOUT THIS STUDY, AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study is part of an ongoing activity on utility model patent (hereafter abbreviated as “utility model”) systems under the “IP Key” Project (short for “Intellectual Property: A Key to Sustainable Competiveness”) – a three-year project with multiple activities every year, running from 2013-2016. The project is funded by the European Commission and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM), and implemented by OHIM with support from the European Patent Office (EPO). It serves as the vehicle for implementing the Administration Agreement on the New EU-China Cooperation on Intellectual Property signed in July 2013 between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility Model Protection in Pakistan an Option for Incentivising Incremental Innovation
    Utility Model Protection in Pakistan An Option for Incentivising Incremental Innovation Dr. Henning Grosse Ruse–Khan Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law in cooperation with Mr. Ahmad Mukhtar as the national expert This paper was commissioned by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) under the second European Union-Pakistan Trade Related Technical Assistance (TRTA-2) Program. The views expressed in this work are those of the author in his/her personal capacity and do not necessarily represent the positions or opinions of the Secretariat of the World Intellectual Property Organization, its Member States or the funding institution. page 2 OUTLINE 1. Introduction a. Tasks assigned i. Contextual Background ii. Principal Tasks b. Methodology 2. Overview of Legal and Economic Aspects of Utility Model Protection a. International Legal Framework i. The Paris Convention ii. The WTO TRIPS Agreement iii. Free Trade, Economic Partnership, and International Investment Agreements iv. Key Aspects of Policy Space for Designing Domestic Protection b. Legal Aspects of Utility Model Protection i. Common Elements amongst National Systems ii. Main Areas of Divergence c. Economic Aspects and Policy Considerations of Utility Model Protection i. Economic Rationale 1. Incentives for Minor and Incremental Innovation 2. Incentives for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) 3. Encouraging Local Innovation ii. Costs and Disadvantages 1. Legal Uncertainty and Wasteful Litigation 2. Blocking the Public Domain and Preventing Technological Learning by Imitation iii. Specific Considerations for Developing Countries 1. Domestic Innovation below the Patent Level 2. Degree of Copying and Imitation in Sub-Patentable Innovation 3. Alternative Protection Regimes 4.
    [Show full text]
  • PCT Newsletter, April 2018
    www.wipo.int/pct/en April 2018 | No. 04/2018 PCT Patent Prosecution Highway (PCT-PPH) Pilot Programs New two-way PCT-PPH pilot program (National Institute of Industrial Property (Chile) – State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China) On 1 January 2018, a new two-way PCT-PPH pilot program started between the National Institute of Industrial Property (Chile) and the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China) (SIPO). Under this program, accelerated processing in the national phase in one country is available on the basis of a PCT application with a positive written opinion from either the International Searching Authority (ISA) or the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), or a positive international preliminary report on patentability (IPRP) (Chapter II) (that is, where at least one of the claims has been determined as patentable), issued by the Office of the other country in its capacity as ISA/IPEA. Further information on the above-mentioned PCT-PPH agreements is available at: https://www.inapi.cl/portal/publicaciones/608/w3-article-11454.html http://www.sipo.gov.cn/ztzl/zlscgslpphzl/pphzn/1110649.htm Extension of existing PPH pilot program to include PCT work products (Intellectual Property Office of Singapore – SIPO) The already-existing PPH pilot program between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and SIPO was extended to include the use of PCT work products on 1 September 2017. This means that accelerated processing in the national phase in one country is available on the basis of a PCT application with a positive written opinion from either the International Searching Authority (ISA) or the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), or a positive international preliminary report on patentability (IPRP) (Chapter II) (that is, where at least one of the claims has been determined as patentable), issued by the Office of the other country in its capacity as ISA/IPEA.
    [Show full text]