Ohio Total Maximum Daily Load Program Progress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Swan Ohio Total Maximum Daily Load Program Progress Other Maumee River tributaries Conneaut, Arcola, Euclid Maumee (lower) tributaries and Beaver Creeks and Lake Erie tributaries Ashtabula River St. Joseph Tenmile Creek Grand River (lower) Tiffin River P River Swan Grand y r Chagrin m d Creek ive River a an t R t Tiffin ms sain River (upper) u Cree, te s n e in S ou um a T Old i Ma ver M n e Ri Sandusky Bay Woman Cuyahoga g aiz l C Aug Tributaries Cuyahoga River Creek r Portage River e (upper) e Sandusky Rocky k Powell River Black (lower) Creek River (lower) Huron River River Cuyahoga River Mahoning River Mahoning Auglaize River (middle) River (lower) River (upper) (lower) Blanchard River Sandusky Tuscarawas Beaver Creek River (upper) River Nimishillen Ottawa River Little and Grand Creek Lake St. Marys (Lima) Beaver Mohican River Sandy Creek Olentangy Creek St. Marys Auglaize Sugar River River Scioto River River Killbuck Creek Yellow (upper) (upper) Conotton Wabash Kokosing Creek Creek Creek Great Miami River Bok River River (upper) es C ree k Stillwater Mill Creek Big Cross, Short Walhonding and Creek and Wheeling Great (Scioto River) Walnut Wakatomika Muskingum Creeks Miami Creek Creek Stillwater River Mad Big River Tributaries River Darby Licking River River Salt (middle) Creek Scioto Creek Wills River Captina and Moxahala (Muskingum Creek Twin (middle) Walnut McMahon Creek River) Creek Deer Creek Creeks Great Little Miami Creek Whitewater Miami River (upper) Hocking River Wolf, Olive Duck River River Monday Green,Meigs Creek (lower) Creek and Rainbow Sunday Salt Creeks Paint Creek Creek Little Miami Creek River (lower) (Scioto Raccoon River) Creek (upper) East Fork Little Muskingum River White Scioto Little Miami Oak River Leading River Mill Creek Creek (lower) Creek (Ohio River) Scioto Brush Pine, Ice Bullskin, Twelvemile Creek and Little Raccoon and Muddy Creeks Scioto Creek Creeks Symmes (lower) Creek Little Hocking River, Shade River and Turkey, Straight Kyger Creek and Eagle Creeks 0 10 20 40 No data available Miles Approved by U.S. EPA Updated 7/19/2017 First cycle TMDL approved by U.S. EPA; second cycle TMDL under development First cycle TMDL approved by U.S. EPA; second cycle watershed assessment in progress TMDL under development Watershed assessment in progress ABC As of 7/19/17 the Biological and Water Quality Study Report is not final.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C
Table 2-1. Basin characteristics determined for selected streamgages in Ohio and adjacent States. [Characteristics listed in this table are described in detail in the text portion of appendix 2; column headings used in this table are shown in parentheses adjacent to the bolded long variable names] Station number Station name DASS Latc Longc SL10-85 LFPath SVI Agric Imperv OpenWater W 03089500 Mill Creek near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale Creek near Pricetown, Ohio 21.68 41.0908 81.0409 14.09 12.88 0.8076 40.46 1.08 0.48 2.31 03092090 West Branch Mahoning River near Ravenna, Ohio 21.81 41.2084 81.1983 20.23 11.19 0.5068 38.65 2.35 1.01 2.51 03102950 Pymatuning Creek at Kinsman, Ohio 96.62 41.4985 80.6401 5.46 21.10 0.6267 52.26 0.82 1.18 5.60 03109500 Little Beaver Creek near East Liverpool, Ohio 495.57 40.8103 80.6732 7.89 55.27 0.4812 38.05 1.98 0.79 1.41 03110000 Yellow Creek near Hammondsville, Ohio 147.22 40.5091 80.8855 9.37 33.62 0.5439 19.84 0.34 0.33 0.36 03111500 Short Creek near Dillonvale, Ohio 122.95 40.2454 80.8859 15.25 27.26 0.3795 30.19 1.08 0.93 1.16 03111548 Wheeling Creek below Blaine, Ohio 97.60 40.1274 80.9477 13.43 27.46 0.3280 40.92 0.97 0.56 0.64 03114000 Captina Creek at Armstrongs Mills, Ohio 133.69 39.9307 81.0696 13.56 26.99 0.6797 32.76 0.54 0.64 0.66 03115400 Little Muskingum River at Bloomfield, Ohio 209.94 39.6699 81.1370 5.50 44.84 0.7516 10.00 0.25 0.12 0.12 03115500 Little Muskingum River at Fay, Ohio 258.25 39.6406 81.1531 4.32 60.10 0.7834
[Show full text]
Stillwater River Opportunities for Recreation, from Kayaking and Canoeing to Fishing and Wildlife Watching
Our rivers and streams offer wonderful Stillwater River opportunities for recreation, from kayaking and canoeing to fishing and wildlife watching. But it’s important to learn how to enjoy them safely. Review the information on the reverse side to make sure your next outing on the Stillwater River is a safe and fun adventure. HARDIN AUGLAIZE MERCER A N O The Great Miami River Watershed A I I H D O LOGAN N I SHELBY S T I L L W A T E R R E R I V V TOLEDO E I R CLEVELAND DARKE R CHAMPAIGN I M MIAMI A I M SW 65.0 T R A E E V I CLARK R R G A D SW 63.0 M MONTGOMERY DAYTON PREBLE SW 61.0 COLUMBUS GREENE R E V I R I M I A CINCINNATI M T A E BUTLER R SW 57.0 G WARREN SW 59.0 HAMILTON OHIO KENTUCKY SW 55.0 SW 53.7 SW 49.0 SW 53.0 SW 47.0 SW 45.0 SW 43.0 SW 51.0 SW 38.6 SW 41.0 SW 37.5 SW 35.0 SW 35.9 GC 27.0 GC 25.0 SW 32.4 GC 20.8 GC 13.7 GC 21.3 GC 13.0 GC 03.0 SW 32.3 GC GC 11.0 GC 09.0 GC 05.0 GC 23.6 GC 21.3 GC 19.5 GC 13.7 06.2 GC 01.7 SW 31.2 GC 15.0 GC 07.0 GC 01.6 GC 21.6 GC 17.0 SW 30.5 SW 29.4 SW 27.6 SW 27.0 SW 25.0 MAP SYMBOLS SW 23.3 SW 23.4 Ohio State Routes Brukner SW 21.5 Nature Center SW Stillwater River U.S.
[Show full text]
Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002
State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
[Show full text]
Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation
Ohio 2010 Integrated Report Section F Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation F1. Background Prior to the 2002 Integrated Report (IR), the reporting of recreation use impairment in Ohio was sporadic. Section 305(b) reports (1998 and earlier) may have included an indication of the potential for recreation use impairment in various streams, but a cohesive listing was not presented. The 2002 IR employed a uniform methodology to examine readily available data on fecal coliform counts. This approach was based on counting the number of exceedances of the secondary contact recreation use maximum criterion [5000 colony forming units (cfu)/100 ml fecal coliform or 576 cfu/100 ml Escherichia coli (E. coli)]. Any assessment unit with five or more samples over the last five years above these values was listed as having an impaired recreation use. The 2004 IR adopted a more statistically robust methodology for assessing the recreation use attainment of the State’s surface waters linked more directly to the applicable water quality standards. The methodology adopted in 2004 continued to be used through the 2008 IR. The 2008 IR also included a preview of changes anticipated at the time for the 2010 report based on the expectation that the watershed assessment unit (WAU) would change from a larger watershed size (11-digit hydrologic unit) to a smaller watershed size (12-digit hydrologic unit) and on four anticipated revisions to the water quality standards: 1) dropping the fecal coliform criteria; 2) creation of a tiered set of classes of primary contact recreation waters based on recreation use intensity; 3) revision of the geometric mean averaging period; and 4) extension of the recreation season.
[Show full text]
Appendix A. Darke County
MIAMI VALLEY REGION AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix A. Darke County A.1 DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Darke County is located in the northwest portion of the Miami Valley Region as shown in Figure A-1 and encompasses approximately 600 square miles, or 26% of the planning area. Figure A-1. Darke County Location Map Land use within Darke County is predominately rural, with over 80% of the land used for agricultural production. Darke County has the second highest concentration of animal feeding operations (AFOs) in Ohio. The County is characterized by small villages and wide open spaces. There are also several natural open spaces along stream corridors designated for recreational use and wildlife preservation. A.1.1 Communities in Darke County Although Darke County includes several communities, it is not heavily populated. The most recent 20-year projections indicate that the population in Darke is expected to remain constant. Although the population projections indicate overall growth in Darke County over the next 20 years, the population within the Stillwater River watershed in the county is not anticipated to change significantly. The administrative boundaries within this area are listed in Table A-1. Table A-1. Administrative Boundaries within Darke County Townships Incorporated Communities Adams Neave Liberty Ansonia Greenville Versailles Allen Patterson Mississinawa Arcanum North Star Wayne Lakes Brown Richland Wayne Bradford (portion) Osgood Yorkshire Franklin Van Buren York Burkettsville/New Weston Rossburg Greenville Wabash Washington Gettysburg Union City Jackson 74 MIAMI VALLEY REGION AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Watershed groups that are active in Darke County are listed in Table A-2.
[Show full text]
Download Stillwater River Water Trail
Stillwater River Water Trail Our rivers and streams offer wonderful opportunities for recreation, from kayaking and canoeing to fishing and wildlife watching. But it’s important to learn how to enjoy them safely. Review the information on the reverse side to make sure your next outing on the Stillwater River Water Trail is a safe and fun adventure. SW 65.0 SW 63.0 SW 61.0 SW 57.0 SW 59.0 SW 55.0 Coming Soon SW 53.7 SW 49.0 SW 53.0 SW 47.0 SW 45.0 SW 43.0 SW 51.0 SW 38.6 SW 41.0 SW 37.5 SW 35.0 SW 35.9 GC 27.0 GC 25.0 SW 32.4 GC 21.3 GC 20.8 GC 03.0 GC 13.7 GC 13.7 SW 32.0 SW 32.5 GC GC 05.0 GC 23.6 GC 19.5 11.0 GC 09.0 GC 06.2 GC 01.7 GC 21.3 GC 13.0 GC 15.0 SW 31.2 GC 07.0 GC 01.6 GC 21.6 GC 17.0 SW 30.5 SW 29.4 SW 27.6 SW 27.0 SW 25.0 SW 23.3 SW 23.4 SW 21.5 LC 01.0 Map Legend LC 13.0 SW 21.0 LC 03.0 LC 01.2 Roadside N 39˚ 59’ 53” Parking LC 09.0 W 84˚ 20’ 15” River Miles MCD LC 11.0 LC 05.0 Water Trail Access Parking Lot Flood Control Dam River Miles Restrooms Low Dams LC 07.0 No Access Drinking Water Ohio State Routes SW Stillwater River SW 17.4 GC Greenville Creek Picnic Area U.S.
[Show full text]
Five Rivers Metroparks History
FIVE RIVERS METROPARKS HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS BEFORE THE BEGINNING .........................................................................................................................4 The 1913 Flood ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Flood Control System ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Recreation Areas .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 More Open Space Needed ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Beginning of the Park District ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Board of Park Commissioners ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Early Funding .................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 First Levy Attempt .......................................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
3745-1-21 Great Miami River Drainage Basin. (A) the Water Bodies Listed In
3745-1-21 Great Miami river drainage basin. (A) The water bodies listed in table 21-1 of this rule are ordered from downstream to upstream. Tributaries of a water body are indented. The aquatic life habitat, water supply and recreation use designations are defined in rule 3745-1-07 of the Administrative Code. The state resource water use designation is defined in rule 3745-1-05 of the Administrative Code. The most stringent criteria associated with any one of the use designations assigned to a water body will apply to that water body. (B) Figure 1 of the appendix to this rule is a generalized map of the Great Miami river drainage basin. A generalized map of Ohio outlining the twenty-three major drainage basins and listing associated rule numbers in Chapter 3745-1 of the Administrative Code is in figure 1 of the appendix to rule 3745-1-08 of the Administrative Code. (C) RM, as used in this rule, stands for river mile and refers to the method used by the Ohio environmental protection agency to identify locations along a water body. Mileage is defined as the lineal distance from the downstream terminus (i.e., mouth) and moving in an upstream direction. (D) The following symbols are used throughout this rule: * Designated use based on the 1978 water quality standards; + Designated use based on the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency; o Designated use based on justification other than the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency; and L An L in the warmwater habitat column signifies that the water body segment is designated limited warmwater habitat.
[Show full text]
Toledo-Magazine-Fall-Fly-Fishing.Pdf
TOLEDO MAGAZINE toledoBlade.com THE BLADE, TOLEDO, OHIO SUNDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2011 SECTION B, PAGE 6 THE OUTDOORS PAGE !7BB<BO<?I>?D= on the scenic Little Beaver Creek BLADE WATERCOLOR/JEFF BASTING PHOTOS BY MIKE MAINHART By STEVE POLLICK and JEFF BASTING t is time well-spent, flycasting bald eagle, an osprey, and, around for smallmouth bass on a re- the next bend, two deer, wading, Imote, wild, scenic stream on one of them a nice buck. This is a a sunny autumn day. place to lose track of time. The surprising thing is that here It is not easy wading over the cob- on Little Beaver Creek, it is so wild, ble for hours, but too soon the sun- so quiet, so remote that you wonder shot shadows are getting long and whether you actually are in Ohio. you realize that you are a steady, 45- Hard by the Pennsylvania line on minute hike from the Jeep, follow- the eastern border of Ohio, 36 miles ing an old mule towpath. Tracing it of the Little Beaver system comprise is a godsend when you are hungry a state and national wild and scenic and tired and want to “get back.” river. A 2,722-acre state park named The raised path was used in the for the creek is a good place for an 1830s and 1840s by muleskinners outing, the bridges at its upper and prodding teams that pulled tow- lower ends making nice bookends boats through the 90 locks of the 73- for a day astream. mile-long Sandy and Beaver Canal.
[Show full text]
Biological and Water Quality Study of the Stillwater River Basin
Biological and Water Quality Study of the Stillwater River Basin Darke, Miami and Montgomery Counties OHIO EPA Technical Report EAS/2014‐10‐08 Division of Surface Water Ecological Assessment Section April 2, 2015 EAS/2014‐10‐08 Stillwater River Basin April 2, 2015 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Stillwater River Basin Darke, Miami, and Montgomery Counties, Ohio 2013 Ohio EPA Technical Report EAS/2014‐10‐08 April 2, 2015 Prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Southwest District Office 401 East Fifth Street Dayton, Ohio 45402 Ecological Assessment Section Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43216‐1049 Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, Ohio 43215 John R. Kasich Governor, State of Ohio Craig W. Butler Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency i EAS/2014‐10‐08 Stillwater River Basin April 2, 2015 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... xii Notice to Users ............................................................................................................................................ xiii Forward ........................................................................................................................................................ xv Executive Summary
[Show full text]
Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
[Show full text]
The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio
University of Dayton eCommons Honors Theses University Honors Program 4-2016 The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio Sarah Anne Stalder University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses Part of the Biology Commons eCommons Citation Stalder, Sarah Anne, "The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio" (2016). Honors Theses. 133. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/133 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio Honors Thesis Sarah Anne Stalder Department: Biology Advisor: Jeffrey Kavanaugh, Ph.D. April 2016 The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio Honors Thesis Sarah Anne Stalder Department: Biology Advisor: Jeffrey Kavanaugh, Ph.D. April 2016 Abstract Five Rivers Metroparks and the Miami Conservancy District have made plans to remove the upper portion of the Monument Avenue low-head dam in downtown Dayton due to the hazard it poses for recreation on the river and its negative impact on water quality and biodiversity.
[Show full text]