DOCSLIB.ORG

This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Body and material substance in the 'Periphyseon' of John Scottus Eriugena Heber-Percy, Colin The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 Body and Material Substance in the Periphyseon of John Scottus Eriugena by Colin Heber-Percy PhD THESIS DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY KING'S COLLEGE LONDON UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MAY 2006 .0105 UlT, / Body and Material Substance in the Periphyseon of John Scottus Eriugena An Abstract It has been argued (by Richard Sorabji among others) that in the Periphyseon John Scottus Eriugena (? 800 - ?877) presents an immaterialist theory of corporeal substance.I argue that as it stands this claim requires qualification. At Points in the Periphyseon Eriugena's theory of body presupposesa material substrate. In Part One of this study I aim to show - by an analysis of Eriugena's definitions of form, substance,and matter - that the immaterialist and substrate theories, although prima facie inconsistent with one another, combine to form a single unified theory of body understood `dialectically. ' In Part Two I argue that, by mapping the philosophical notions of processio and reditus onto the Christian doctrines of Fall and Resurrection, Eriugena develops a theory of body according to which diversity is illusory (punishment for sin), and the `created' reality (man's pre-lapsarian state) is radical simplicity. The Fall is a fall into diversity, into effect; the Resurrection is a return to simplicity, to the Cause. Eriugena has primarily been thought of, both by his contemporaries and modern commentators, as a metaphysician, a liberal arts master, a Neoplatonist. Without denying that he is all or any of these, it is the aim of this study to show that his body his masterpiece - and in particular theory of - serves a practical purpose: to bring fallen human nature back into alignment with God. Through a radical de-historicizing of the doctrir:.es of Fall and Resurrection, and a dialectical understanding of the relation that obtains between Creator and creation, Eriugena presents a theory of body and material substance that is at once wholly ascetic and profoundly optimistic. 2 CONTENTS Part One 0 Introduction 6 i) Aims and Objectives 6 ii) The Problem 7 0 Chapter One : Form 13 Introduction 13 I Two Forms 14 A) Qualitative Form 14 i) Are QFs Bodily? 15 B) Substance and Substantial Form 17 i) SF and Body 21 ii) Body: Two Descriptions 24 II Substance and Accident 28 III Substance and the Contemplating Mind 35 i) Substantial non-being 39 ii) Virtus, Vis and Potestas 41 Conclusion 45 . Chapter Two : Matter 47 Introduction 47 i) Creation and Formless Matter 47 I The Problem : Two Theories 51 A) Eriugena's Immaterialist Theory 51 i) Accidentium Quandam Compositionem 52 ii) The Categories 53 B) Eriugena's Substrate Theory 58 60 i) Materia Informis -a definition ii) Recapitulation 65 II The Quantum Solution 66 III Dialectic : How Body is Grouped Intellectually 74 i) Conclusion 80 IV Two Objections 81 i) Individuation 82 ii) Visibility 90 3 Part Two " Introduction 96 " Chapter Three : The Fall 99 Introduction 99 Part One - The Fall I Two Possibilities 103 i) There is no Fall 104 ii) The Fall is identical to Creation 106 II Matter and Evil 110 III Matter as Punishment 114 IV Two Bodies, Two Creations 116 i) Conclusion 120 Part Two - Paradise Introduction 122 IA Tale of Two Tree, : The Fall as Epistemic Crisis 123 i) The Gnoston 124 II The Six Parts of Man 130 III Conclusion 134 i) The Fall as Guide for Living 136 is ii) There no Fall -a reprise 137 " Chapter Four : The Return 142 Part OZe - Death and Resurrection Introduction 142 I The Return 145 II Death and Dissolution 152 i) The Resurrection of the Body 154 ii) Death and Ignorance 159 iii) The Scope of the Return 164 III The Incarnation. 166 IV Summary 171 Unification Part Two - Return as Introduction 172 I Unification 173 4 0 Conclusion 186 i) Contemplation 187 0 Bibliography 190 000 ABBREVIATIONS I Sheldon-Williams I. P. (ed. and trans. ), Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Periphyseon Liber Primus (Scriptores Latini Hiberniae vol. VII, Dublin, 1968) II Sheldon-Williams I. P. (ed. and trans.), Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Periphyseon Liber Secundus (Scriptores Latini Hiberniae vol. IX, Dublin, 1972) III Sheldon-Williams I. P. (ed. and trans.), Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Periphyseon Liber Tertius (Scriptores Latini Hiberniae vol. XI, Dublin, 1981) IV Jeauneau,Edouard (ed.), 0' Meara, J. J., Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (trans.) Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Periphyseon Liber Quartus (Scriptores Latini Hiberniae vol. XIII, Dublin, 1995) V Jeaun.eau, Edouard (ed.) CCCM CLXV Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Periphyseon Liber Quintus (Turnholti, 2003) CCCM Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis CSEL Cofpus Scriptorium Ecclesiasticerum Latinorum CCSL Ccrpus Christianorum Series Latina MGH Monumenta Germaniae Historica PG Patrologia Graeca PL Patrologia Latina w I 5 PART ONE Introduction i) Aims and Objectives: In its final analysis, the Periphyseon' of John Scottus Eriugena is an extended meditation upon the relation between God and creation. It is the aim of this study to offer a detailed examination of the role of body and material substance within that relationship. In Part One we shall attempt to demonstrate that Eriugena's various accounts of body and material substance can be taken to express a single coherent thesis. In Chapters One and Two we shall look at form and matter respectively. By the end of Part One it is hoped that we shall have a resilient model of Eriugenian body. Part Two shall then be taken up with an attempt to illustrate the role played by the body in the unfolding of Eriugena's broader metaphysics and theology. Chapter Three studies the role of body in the Fall; and Chapter Four ponders the death of the body, its resurrection and the return of human nature to God. The problems under discussion in Part One are, in a sense,internal to Eriugena's metaphysical schema. The problems that shall form the focus of Part Two are, as it were, external to the theory itself: is it now possible to show that the account of body developed in Part One is consistent with the incontrovertible teaching of Holy Scripture? In this sensethe present study mirrors the form of the Periphyseon itself, being into lion's roughly divisible two parts - the metaphysical groundwork occupies the ' For the title of the Periphyseon, see Sheldon-Williams, I. P., "The Title of Eriugena's Periphyseon," Studia Patristica, 3 (Berlin, 1961) pp. 297-302 6 share of the opening sections; the later work consists in showing how the theory of body reached in Part One finds endorsement through scriptural exegesis. ii) The Problem: Influenced by his freshly absorbed Greek sources, the relationship between God and creation is conceived by Eriugena in terms of a Procession from God and a Return to 2 God. So, for example, in the Preface to his translation of Maximus the Confessor's Ambigua, Eriugena claims that Maximus reveals what sort of thing Procession is, namely a multiplication of the divine goodness through all the things that are, descending from the highest to the lowest, firstly from the general essenceof all things, then through the most general genera, next through the more general genera, then the more specific species to the most specific species through differences and properties. And likewise, what sort of thing Reversion of the divine goodness is, namely a congregation, through the same stages from the infinite and multiplex variety of those things that are to the simplest unity of all things, which is in God and is God; so that God might be all things, and all things might be God. 3 Even at this early stage in our investigation it is worth noting that the `movement language' of procession and return, is translatable, according to Eriugena, into language that does not imply movement: multiplication and congregation. This `static' rendering of classical Neoplatonic metaphysics will prove crucial to our analysis in Part Two of the Fall and Return as `alignments' of the will and the intellectual, perceptive faculties rather than as historical processes. 2 See Jeauneau, E, "The Neoplatonic Themes of Processio and Reditus in Eriugena, " Dionysius 15 (1991). For a clear and unequivocal expression of the view that the Periphyseon is an attempt to frame a new metaphysical structure for understanding the relation between God and man, see Moran, The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena. A Study of Idealism in the Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1989) p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medieval Western Philosophy: the European Emergence
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series I, Culture and Values, Volume 9 History of Western Philosophy by George F. McLean and Patrick J. Aspell Medieval Western Philosophy: The European Emergence By Patrick J. Aspell The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy 1 Copyright © 1999 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Gibbons Hall B-20 620 Michigan Avenue, NE Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Aspell, Patrick, J. Medieval western philosophy: the European emergence / Patrick J. Aspell. p.cm. — (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series I. Culture and values ; vol. 9) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Philosophy, Medieval. I. Title. III. Series. B721.A87 1997 97-20069 320.9171’7’090495—dc21 CIP ISBN 1-56518-094-1 (pbk.) 2 Table of Contents Chronology of Events and Persons Significant in and beyond the History of Medieval Europe Preface xiii Part One: The Origins of Medieval Philosophy 1 Chapter I. Augustine: The Lover of Truth 5 Chapter II. Universals According to Boethius, Peter Abelard, and Other Dialecticians 57 Chapter III. Christian Neoplatoists: John Scotus Erigena and Anselm of Canterbury 73 Part Two: The Maturity of Medieval Philosophy Chronology 97 Chapter IV. Bonaventure: Philosopher of the Exemplar 101 Chapter V. Thomas Aquinas: Philosopher of the Existential Act 155 Part Three: Critical Reflection And Reconstruction 237 Chapter VI. John Duns Scotus: Metaphysician of Essence 243 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Filosofia De Escoto.Pdf
    THE NELSON PHILOSOPHICAL TEXTS General Editor Raymond Klibansky Frothingham Professor of Logic and Metaphysics McGill University Honorary Fellow of the Warburg Institute University of London Nihil obstat: Roy Effler, o.f.m. Censor Deputatus Imprimi potest: Eligius Weir, o.f.m. Minister Provincialis Nihil obstat: Philotheus Boehner, o.f.m. Censor Deputatus Imprimatur : ' 4" Josephus Aloisius Episcopus Bujfalensis Smtnt Itwnnpftwrttlf ro (irncmt fixv< »ctti«W *(fileni tmitr mCpt" rt& lift* uft mrc \vt(xfiqi amis p \mh (idnc ys pmo lit pf nt«ttoUrt»te -n:omuli?-. Si p'V «j" a- pmo ofao \n 1 1TB TOWIC mfll!l?0iji'r [i run00 S oii-rtrhi ncf iip^Jdcm 6* emnpSui.pommel gjpWolitw »n •i|cnsg 0ntcc%r per h?c nir at I ens ihr r*<wie*&oumrr's nccns <jt» saffntflrijni <f u \}<*tm time }-mcn iyenvi [ivb pint)fpffim*tpttmr f«iTmn tt*$Wfi»t,ttttHftt,et' niu6ififtnrc%. '>i:'»c«*i!>wpnTicrn»«',,v)*'" Iroi i Wf,4*notnjMfi;r«f»^i&i« fitpnn pfttwti Hlo $° n^mn^misy? p<nfe nnofcfiflr mnmifi ; ttanM fs i nrpfn& ne arftnr-ml'w mufti' in jrftis jjr ft no teft n va'^itinotU'jo'nDntr ci6 w (Jft,|6 '"£$ 'alms i fme'enu cWidil mint r»i«jf tiotthnrm nans pB*fft rmaaflrftl p'c(flh«frnU8ttrfHflaTiimfl \\?i\i\x ni pis lih&j en- injprniara otcnr SSrtnf^fi^ r paa «3 «rt fine ci(pnttma i^a^ (l)lr <*£(,. m-t f^t gtvile g-t«Tnc'Tn|pnt*o,copn»'6»tnptilt g^ppCjipjf iKKittlh ?impftiifi0oicttfci$utm ^Strintfnnnl mm jj>no6tr |sjc'T inifirmntonWrcnt$> otbcfp mttwg cf &cyxitwnam omi raj^t * (> on? moo' aj$-' 5? * r^Nft 0^«'riM«;Vo»sc»t«flm5»ir,nirj)i'a vnTe'tc «i)pta r*^ aeftipf JH-tteefl-cna ie»rf»r fomnne tfiv\ «nnftot vtnnta iwnir ca gr*Yi"aiuis pirhfc ernn Hfafmtttv Beginning of the Ordinatio of Duns Scotus From MS lat.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriugena's Christian Neoplatonism and Its Sources in Patristic
    Eriugena’s Christian Neoplatonism and its Sources in Patristic Philosophy and Ancient Philosophy (I) 16:00 - 18:30 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation type Workshop [No author data] Discussant: Willemien Otten This workshop analyses Eriugena's Christian Platonic ideas on Theology, Cosmology, Anthropology (including Epistemology and Ethics) and their sources in Patristic philosophical theology and in ancient philosophy – two strictly interrelated, often inseparable fields. It includes world leaders in Eriugena studies; papers offer important and novel insights into Eriugena's thought and its sources. 508 Eriugena and Maximos on Divisions of Being Andrew Louth University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom Abstract The Latin title of Eriugena’s principal work Periphyseon is De divisione naturae. As he himself makes clear, by his citation from Maximos the Confessor, his notion of the division of nature is derived from, or at least inspired by, Maximos, who was himself inheriting a pattern of division or distinction from earlier writers, notably Gregory of Nyssa, whom Eriugena himself knew and had translated. The problem is: in what way is Eriugena indebted to Maximos over this central notion? The paper begins by putting Eriugena’s work, of both translation and speculative metaphysics, in context in his life and work, emphasizing Eriugena’s basic formation as a Latin, indeed Augustinian, theologian (though original in his interpretation), in terms of which his indebtedness to the Greek theology he translated is to be interpreted. Initially, it appears that the notion of division of nature was conceived of in dialectical terms, however, as Eriugena developed the notion from book II onwards, it becomes primarily metaphysical.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories and Images of Creation in Northern Europe in the Twelfth Century
    Art History ISSN 0141-6790 Vol. 22 No. 1 March 1999 pp. 3-55 In the Beginning: Theories and images of creation in Northern Europe in the twelfth century Conrad Rudolph 'Logic has made me hated by the world!' So Peter Abelard thought and wrote to his former lover, the brilliant Heloise, in probably his last letter to her before his death in 1142, after having been virtually driven from Paris by Bernard of Clairvaux, the austere Cistercian mystic and perhaps the most powerful ecclesiastical politician of Western Europe.1 Characteristically for Abelard in matters of self-conception, he was exaggerating. Logic had made him hated not by the world but by only a portion of it. While this was certainly an influential portion and one that had almost succeeded in destroying him, it could never do so entirely. In fact, logic had made Abelard 'the Socrates of the Gauls, the great Plato of the West, our Aristotle ... the prince of scholars'2- and this, this great fame and the almost unprecedented influence that accompanied it, was as much the problem as logic was. In a word, Abelard had been caught up in the politics of theology. The time was one of great theological inquiry, challenging, as it did, the very authority of divine revelation on the most fundamental level, and at a moment when both interest in secular learning and the number of students were dramatically increasing - all factors that can hardly be over-emphasized. But for certain elements within the Church, more still was at stake. And this was nothing less than a perceived assault on one of the basic underpinnings of the complex relationship between religion, theology, society and political power.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUNO : Immanence and Transcendence in De La Causa, Principio Et Uno, Dialogue Ii Dilwyn Knox
    BRUNO : IMMANENCE AND TRANSCENDENCE IN DE LA causa, PRINCIPIO ET UNO, DIALOGUE II Dilwyn Knox Summary The second dialogue of De la causa, principio et uno focuses on the transcendence and immanence of the intelligible world. Following Egyptian and Pythagorean doctrine, Bruno described the World Soul and Universal Intellect as immanent, blending in compatible features of Neoplatonic ontology. The position that he attributed to these ancient theologians derived in fact from Stoic philosophy – hence his emphasis on immanence and his designation of the World Soul, rather than a hypostasis Soul of the kind that ancient Neoplatonists had proposed, as intermediary between the Uni- versal Intellect and physical reality. Bruno recognized, however, the limitations of spa- tial analogies when applied to intelligible realities. To clarify his position, he adopted a distinction, originally Neoplatonic and then Arabic, between cause and principle developed by Thomas Aquinas in De principiis naturae. The original purpose of this doctrine had been to explain the simultaneous transcendence and immanence of in- telligible realities, the problem that Bruno was addressing in the second dialogue of De la causa. runo gave his first detailed account of the intelligible world, as far as Bhis surviving works reveal, in the second dialogue of De la causa, prin- cipio et uno (1584). Here he explained the relationship of God, the Universal Intellect, the World Soul and matter and, to this end, introduced the distinc- tion between principle and cause which, as its title suggests, informs the [email protected] I have used the following abbreviations in addition to those used in this journal : ch : Corpus Hermeticum, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • These Disks Contain My Version of Paul Spade's Expository Text and His Translated Texts
    These disks contain my version of Paul Spade's expository text and his translated texts. They were converted from WordStar disk format to WordPerfect 5.1 disk format, and then I used a bunch of macros and some hands-on work to change most of the FancyFont formatting codes into WordPerfect codes. Many transferred nicely. Some of them are still in the text (anything beginning with a backslash is a FancyFont code). Some I just erased without knowing what they were for. All of the files were cleaned up with one macro, and some of them have been further doctored with additional macros I wrote later and additional hand editing. This explains why some are quite neat, and others somewhat cluttered. In some cases I changed Spade's formatting to make the printout look better (to me); often this is because I lost some of his original formatting. I have occasionally corrected obvious typos, and in at least one case I changed an `although' to a `but' so that the line would fit on the same page. With these exceptions, I haven't intentionally changed any of the text. All of the charts made by graphics are missing entirely (though in a few cases I perserved fragments so you can sort of tell what it was like). Some of the translations had numbers down the side of the page to indicate location in the original text; these are all lost. Translation 1.5 (Aristotle) was not on the disk I got, so it is listed in the table of contents, but you won't find it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Postmodern Retrieval of Neoplatonism in Jean-Luc Marion
    The Postmodern Retrieval of Neoplatonism in Jean-Luc Marion and John Milbank and the Origins of Western Subjectivity in Augustine and Eriugena Hermathena, 165 (Winter, 1998), 9-70. Neoplatonism commanded important scholarly energy and poetic and literary talent in the later two-thirds of our century. Now it attracts considerable philosophical and theological interest. But this may be its misfortune. The Dominican scholar M.-D. Chenu judged the Leonine utilization of St. Thomas to have been detrimental for our understanding of his doctrine. Thomas was made an instrument of an imperialist Christianity. The use of Aquinas as a weapon against modernity required a “misérable abus.” The Holy Office made Fr. Chenu pay dearly enough for attempting accurate historical study of the Fathers and medieval doctors to make us give him heed.1 The present retrieval of our philosophical and theological past has a very different relation to institutional interests than belonged to Leonine Neothomism. The problems intellectuals now have with truthfulness come more from within themselves than from outside. There is, nonetheless, much in the character of the postmodern turn to Neoplatonism by Christian theologians to cause concern that the ecclesiastical subordination of theoria to praxis which distorted the most recent Thomism may have an analogue for Neoplatonism recovered to serve our desires.2 And if, in fact, our eye has become self-distorting, the problem in our relation to our history will be worse than anything external pressures can cause. This paper aims to begin assessing the character of this distortion in respect to a central question, our understanding of the history of western subjectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • An Original Christian Platonism (Moran 2004).Pdf
    DERMOT MORAN University College Dublin AN ORIGINAL CHRISTIAN PLATONISM: ERIUGENA'S RESPONSE TO THE TRADITION In keeping with the theme of this FIDEM conference, «Medieval Studies Today and Tomorrow», in this contribution I want to report on the tremendous blossoming of studies in the philosophy of Johannes Scottus Eriugena, witnessed by the growth in critical editions, translations and critical discussions, over not just the past 10 years, but the past 30 years'. The man known to his contemporaries as Johannes Scottus (c.800 - c.877), and who signed himself 'Eriugena' (on the manuscript of his translation of Dionysius), is without doubt the most I genuinely sophisticated philosopher of the Carolingian era, certainly to be ranked above such Carolingians as Alcuin", and indeed, stands as the most important philosopher writing in Latin between Boethius and Anselm. He is also, though this parallel remains to be explored, more or less a contemporary of the Arab Neoplatonist Al-Kindi. Eriugena can also be seen as the most significant intellectual figure to emerge from monastic Ireland, the so-called Island of Saints and Scholars, between the sixth to the ninth century (in comparison with Sedulius Scottus or Columban), although his debt to early Irish culture remains much disputed, even allowing for the fact that he worked, at least in part, with Irish-speaking scholars. In general terms, Eriugena's thought represents a valiant, even inspired attempt to present a consistent, systematic, Christian Neoplatonist account of God, the universe, and all creation, a version , I would like to thank Professor Dr. Theo Kobusch, Bochum, for inviting me to I take part in this panel.
    [Show full text]
  • John Scotus Eriugena
    Handout 4 John Scotus Eriugena (810–877) The foremost thinker of the 9th century and author of the first ”systematic” presentation of theology His name • Eriugena means ”a native of Ireland”. • Scotus also means ”a native of Ireland”. • also called Joannes Scottus Eriugena His life • little known • He came from Ireland to France, as did others at this time (e.g. Alquin), invited by Charles the Bald, he appeared 847 in France at the court. • appointed head of the palace school • commissioned by his royal patron to translate the works of Pseudo-Dionysius into Latin • controversies on predestination and the Eucharist • probably died in France – The tradition that after the death of Charles the Bald he went to England at the invitation of Alfred the Great, that he taught in a school at Malmesbury, and was there was stabbed to death by his pupils with their pens for 'trying to get them to think' has no historical support. 2 Johannes Scottus Eriugena His writings • Translations of the works of Pseudo-Dionysius: ”De Coelesti Hierarchia”; ”De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia”; ”De Divinis Nominibus”; ”De Mystica Theologia”; ”Epistolae” • other translations • Commentaries: on John's Gospel and on Denis the Areopagite • ”Liber de Praedestinatione”, and very probably a work on the Eucharist • his main work: ”De Divisione Naturae” (On The Di- vision of Nature) (865–870) • some poems, written partly in Latin and partly in Greek His Teachings • Erigena regarded man as a microcosm of the wider universe. • on Predestination – just a single predestination, i. e., to grace and salvation, but not to sin. – heavily attacked – In the Councils of Valencia (855) and Langres (859) Eriugena's doctrine was condemned.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriugena, Johannes Scottus (C.800–C.877)
    Eriugena, Johannes Scottus (c.800–c.877) Johannes Scottus Eriugena is the most important philosopher writing in Latin between Boethius and Anselm. A Christian Neoplatonist, he developed a unique synthesis between the Neoplatonic traditions of Pseudo-Dionysius and Augustine. Eriugena knew Greek, which was highly unusual in the West at that time, and his translations of Dionysius and other Greek authors provided access to a theological tradition hitherto unknown in the Latin West. From these sources, Eriugena produced an original cosmology with Nature as the first principle. Nature, the totality of all things that are and are not, includes both God and creation, and has four divisions: nature which creates and is not created, nature which creates and is created, nature which is created and does not create, and nature which is neither created nor creates. These divisions participate in the cosmic procession of creatures from God and in their return to God. As everything takes place within Nature, God is present in all four divisions. Eriugena influenced twelfth-century Neoplatonists but was condemned in the thirteenth century for teaching the identity of God and creation. 1 Life and writings 2 Sources 3 The divisions of nature 4 Influence and significance 1 Life and writings Little is known about Eriugena’s life. His exact place and date of birth are unknown, but contemporary sources refer to him as scottus, meaning ‘Irish’, and he signed one of his manuscripts with the pleonasm ‘Eriugena’ (Irish born). No evidence of his education survives. Johannes joined the court of Charles the Bald, possibly in the 840s, and achieved recognition as a liberal arts master.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Plotinus' Ennead VI.8
    Freedom and the Good: A Study of Plotinus’ Ennead VI.8 [39] by Aaron Higgins-Brake Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2015 © Copyright by Aaron Higgins-Brake, 2015 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….. iii List of Abbreviations Used………………………………………………………………… iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………… v Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1 Experience and Reason……………………………………………………….... 1 1.2 Freedom and Rationality……………………………………………………….. 8 Chapter 2: Freedom, Responsibility, and the Place of the Human…………………....…… 11 2.1 Human Action in Plotinus and its Hellenistic Background…….…………….... 11 2.2 Freedom and Responsibility among the Stoics and Epicureans……………….. 13 2.2 Aristotle and Plotinus on Voluntary Action…………………………………….20 Chapter 3: The Freedom of the One……………………………………………………….. 31 3.1 Origins of the Problematic of Ennead VI.8 [39]..................................................31 3.2 Contingency and Necessity Redivivus…………………………………………. 39 Chapter 4: Procession and Return………………………………………………………….. 49 4.1 From the ‗Will of Itself‘ to the ‗Will of the All‘.................................................. 49 4.2 From Procession to Reversion…………………………………………………. 55 Chapter 5: Conclusion………………………………………………………………………63 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………...67 ii Abstract This thesis investigates Plotinus‘ Ennead VI.8 [39] with a view to reevaluating what scholars have frequently considered to be the problematic implications of his metaphysical thought, and, in particular, Plotinus‘ supposed irrationalism. Our investigation shows that Plotinus is careful to develop an account of freedom that is distinct from acting arbitrarily, without thereby being necessitated or compelled – a development that is already clear in his reflections on human action. Plotinus‘ account culminates in his novel reinterpretation of the first principle, the Good, as the will of itself.
    [Show full text]
  • De Divisione Naturae» De Escoto Eriúgena
    O pensamento da diferença no «De divisione naturae» de Escoto Eriúgena 1. Introdução ao problema da diferença no «De divisione naturae». A expressão da análise reflexiva de alguns aspectos fundamentais inseridos no De divisione naturae de Escoto Eriúgena surge deter- minada, não só por um interesse histórico-filosófico pela especulação eriugeniana, mas também pelo carácter original que a sensibilidade ao problema da diferenciação do real adquire neste autor. Sob o ponto de vista histórico numerosos estudos têm posto em relevo a importância fulcral da doutrina filosófico-teológica de Escoto Eriúgena, tornando a sua figura indispensável para a compreen- são subsequente do pensamento medieval dos séc. xn e seguintes1, não só na influência directa das suas obras, conhecidas de numerosos escolásticos, mas também na indirecta e mais relevante inerência que a posição deste autor adquire no ciclo do pensamento filosófico medievo2. Esta instância indirecta da função do pensamento de Eriúgena na economia especulativa medieval antecipa o carácter dialéctico, que conjuga sobremaneira este filósofo e a sua época, numa tensão significativa entre o estado da cultura e a ousadia criadora de um 1 Cf. o relevo dado ao pensamento de Eriúgena no contexto da história da filosofia medieval por M. DEWULF, Histoire de ia philosophie médiévale, 1.1: Des Origines jusqu'à Thomas d'Aquin, Louvain, 19245; E. GILSON, La philosophie au moyen Age-Des origines patristiques à la fin du XIV' siècle, Paris, Payot, 19622; cf. tb. H. BETT, Johannes Scotus Erigena. A study in mediaeval philosophy, Cambridge, 1925; M. CAPPUYNS. Jean Scot Erigène, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa pensée, Louvain — Paris, 1933 (Bruxelles, anast.
    [Show full text]