DOCSLIB.ORG

Technology • Development • Installation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technology • Development • Installation July 2018 www.solarpowerworldonline.com Technology • Development • Installation Cover_July2018_Vs2.indd 5 7/6/18 4:41 PM = UTILITY CONTRACTOR = RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR = COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTOR = OFF-GRID CONTRACTOR = EPC = INSTALLATION SUBCONTRACTOR = ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR = DEVELOPER = ROOFTOP CONTRACTOR = MANUFACTURER INSTALLER All kW numbers are in DC Pie pieces represent all services and markets in which a company works RANK & STATE/ PRIMARY TOTAL KILOWATTS ALL ALL PRIMARY COMPANY CITY TERRITORY FOUNDED EMPLOYEES MARKET INSTALLED INSTALLED SERVICES MARKETS SERVICE KILOWATTS IN 2017 OFFERED SERVED 56 Nexamp Boston MA 2007 98 84,290 33,176.8 57 LASE Solar Doylestown PA 2016 25 43,971 31,920.6 58 Solar Liberty Bufalo NY 2003 85 60,000 30,072.8 59 EnterSolar New York NY 2005 60 92,483 29,483.1 60 Peck Solar South Burlington VT 1972 130 110,874 28,783.8 61 CalCom Energy Visalia CA 2012 71 76,000 27,882.6 62 Afordable Solar Installation Albuquerque NM 1998 80 91,000 26,643.5 63 MC Power Companies Lees Summit MO 2011 59 64,990 26,201.0 64 Axium Solar Plano TX 2008 30 43,460 25,501.5 65 Riggs Distler Cherry Hill NJ 1909 1,100 178,407 24,341.0 66 Pfister Energy Hawthorne NJ 2005 55 120,000 23,885.0 67 Solect Energy Hopkinton MA 2009 72 80,291 23,291.1 68 United Renewable Energy Alpharetta GA 2008 15 80,662 23,038.0 69 JKB Energy Turlock CA 1982 70 90,000 22,565.8 70 Alten Energy Miami FL 2010 40 45,343 21,122.6 71 Hannah Solar Atlanta GA 2008 105 82,000 21,031.0 72 Semper Solaris El Cajon CA 2012 305 63,370 19,370.3 73 Premier Solar Solutions Phoenix AZ 2004 146 80,000 19,073.8 74 ACE Solar North Andover MA 2015 27 43,080 18,875.3 75 PermaCity Los Angeles CA 2003 15 70,000 18,711.6 76 Kuykendall Solar Coarsegold CA 2010 43 66,721 17,877.9 77 Eficient Energy of Tennessee Powell TN 2009 13 33,389 17,705.0 78 Solar Landscape Neptune NJ 1985 47 65,108 17,673.5 79 Innovative Power Systems Roseville MN 1991 24 43,367 17,586.8 80 American Electric Mililani HI 1946 150 88,253 17,351.0 81 ION Solar Provo UT 2013 450 70,625 17,056.7 82 S&C Electric Company Chicago IL 1911 3,000 280,599 16,929.0 83 Skyline Solar Hamilton NJ 2010 85 51,337 15,033.4 84 Solar Ground-N-Pound Hamlin NY 2016 20 19,953 14,560.0 85 Monolith Solar Albany NY 2009 105 40,492 14,324.3 86 Elite Electric Riverside CA 1979 96 186,352 14,312.0 87 Newkirk Electric Associates Muskegon MI 1961 550 113,071 14,240.0 88 Collins Electrical Stockton CA 1928 500 89,000 14,172.8 89 PFMG Solar Huntington Beach CA 2009 25 76,623 14,073.7 90 Radiance Solar Atlanta GA 2007 50 75,000 13,795.5 30 SOLAR POWER WORLD 7 • 2018 www.solarpowerworldonline.com FINAL list 6-18_Vs2kp.indd 30 7/11/18 10:52 AM Residential Home 17.1 kW Skillman, New Jersey How do solar group buy programs afect local residential contractors? Any mechanism that can be ofered to the solar industry to help increase the proliferation of solar and help the market grow is a good thing. We believe solar group buy programs are beneficial for smaller contractors as they allow them access to equipment at prices they otherwise would not be able to negotiate as an individual entity. While this doesn’t negatively impact larger contractors like ourselves, it does increase the competition for access to those products at those prices and can play a part in our own negotiations. Overall, we are happy that group buy programs give purchasing power to new companies getting started, and we wish them success as our industry continues to thrive. — Kristen Drigon, senior VP of corporate operations for Trinity Solar (No. 39 overall) = EPC = INSTALLATION SUBCONTRACTOR = ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR = DEVELOPER = ROOFTOP CONTRACTOR = MANUFACTURER INSTALLER TOTAL KILOWATTS RES. OVERALL STATE/ COMPANY CITY FOUNDED EMPLOYEES INSTALLED INSTALLED RANK RANK TERRITORY KILOWATTS IN 2017 1 Sunnova 32 Houston TX 2012 280 279,741 82,797.0 2 Trinity Solar 39 Wall Township NJ 1994 1,554 273,477 50,224.8 3 Titan Solar Power 42 Gilbert AZ 2014 265 75,845 46,922.1 4 Momentum Solar 50 Metuchen NJ 2009 606 55,365 35,365.5 5 PetersenDean 51 Fremont CA 1984 3,000 222,000 35,341.7 6 Namasté Solar 52 Boulder CO 2005 163 84,747 34,414.6 7 Semper Solaris 72 El Cajon CA 2012 305 63,370 19,370.3 8 Premier Solar Solutions 73 Phoenix AZ 2004 146 80,000 19,073.8 9 ACE Solar 74 North Andover MA 2015 27 43,080 18,875.3 10 American Electric 80 Mililani HI 1946 150 88,253 17,351.0 11 ION Solar 81 Provo UT 2013 450 70,625 17,056.7 12 Skyline Solar 83 Hamilton NJ 2010 85 51,337 15,033.4 13 Code Green Solar 91 Cherry Hill NJ 2009 200 43,750 13,742.2 14 Sun Valley Solar Solutions 92 Chandler AZ 2006 150 63,200 13,451.1 54 SOLAR POWER WORLD 7 • 2018 www.solarpowerworldonline.com Residential_6-18_Vs1.indd 54 7/11/18 11:41 AM What’s your opinion of online solar marketplaces? From my perspective, EnergySage provides a one-stop shop for homeowners interested in making the switch to solar. These online marketplaces help piece together the solar puzzle by ofering invaluable tools for prospective clients to learn everything from the basics to filling in the blanks on topics like of-grid installations. An online platform can be less intimidating than the initial face-to- face meeting with a salesperson. Solar companies can really benefit from the education EnergySage ofers like solar options and technology, ability to view multiple bids and view company ratings. All these things can help dismiss a homeowner’s hesitations about solar. — David Williamson, CEO Residential Install and co-founder of Titan 16.2 kW Solar Power (No. 42 overall) Goodyear, Arizona = UTILITY CONTRACTOR = RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR = COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTOR = OFF-GRID CONTRACTOR TOTAL KILOWATTS OVERALL RANK COMPANY RANK CITY STATE FOUNDED EMPLOYEES INSTALLED INSTALLED KILOWATTS IN 2017 MARKET 1 Titan Solar Power 42 Gilbert AZ 2014 265 75,845 46,922.1 2 PetersenDean 51 Fremont CA 1984 3,000 222,000 35,341.7 3 Semper Solaris 72 El Cajon CA 2012 305 63,370 19,370.3 4 Skyline Solar 83 Hamilton NJ 2010 85 51,337 15,033.4 5 ReVision Energy 94 Portland ME 2003 250 38,629 13,055.0 6 Baker Electric Home Energy 96 Escondido CA 2007 184 57,731 12,672.8 7 GRID Alternatives 102 Oakland CA 2001 350 42,957 11,235.2 8 Envirosolar 103 San Antonio TX 2012 125 31,595 11,140.1 9 Infinity Energy 110 Rocklin CA 2014 130 18,430 9,830.8 10 Sullivan Solar Power 115 San Diego CA 2004 101 66,607 8,823.0 11 Sunpro Solar 116 Mandeville LA 2008 142 31,788 8,788.4 12 Powerhome Solar 132 Mooresville NC 2014 250 45,119 6,892.9 13 LA Solar Group 137 Los Angeles CA 2012 75 19,464 6,502.4 14 Newport Power 139 San Clemente CA 2008 40 31,102 6,251.9 68 SOLAR POWER WORLD 7 • 2018 www.solarpowerworldonline.com Rooftop_6-18_Vs1.indd 68 7/11/18 11:56 AM Is your business more afected by national or state- level policies? While solar in other countries Residential Install has predominantly been 13.44 kW influenced by national policy, the solar industry in the United West Caldwell, New Jersey States has, to date, thrived only with the dual support of both national and state = UTILITY CONTRACTOR = RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR = COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTOR = OFF-GRID CONTRACTOR = EPC = INSTALLATION SUBCONTRACTOR = ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR = DEVELOPER = ROOFTOP CONTRACTOR = MANUFACTURER INSTALLER level policies. As I map out Momentum Solar’s growth TOTAL KILOWATTS trajectory today and I consider OVERALL where we can be successful in RANK COMPANY RANK CITY FOUNDED EMPLOYEES INSTALLED INSTALLED KILOWATTS IN 2017 MARKET delivering low-cost solar power to our prospective customers, my primary consideration 1 M+W Energy 25 Union 2009 130 847,339 117,938.7 is state and local policy. To 2 Conti Solar 27 Edison 1906 85 329,860 99,860.0 further accelerate our nation’s 3 Trinity Solar 39 Wall Township 1994 1,554 273,477 50,224.8 transition from centralized carbon-emitting power 4 Momentum Solar 50 Metuchen 2009 606 55,365 35,365.5 generation to decentralized 5 Riggs Distler 65 Cherry Hill 1909 1,100 178,407 24,341.0 solar energy, companies like Momentum Solar will need 6 Pfister Energy 66 Hawthorne 2005 55 120,000 23,885.0 the support of thoughtful and 7 Solar Landscape 78 Neptune 1985 47 65,108 17,673.5 progressive policymakers to help pave the way. 8 Skyline Solar 83 Hamilton 2010 85 51,337 15,033.4 9 Code Green Solar 91 Cherry Hill 2009 200 43,750 13,742.2 — Arthur Souritzidis, CEO 10 Infiniti Energy Services 126 Howell 2015 23 8,794 7,921.5 of Momentum Solar 11 Green Power Energy 202 Annandale 2009 40 9,854 2,954.9 (No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015-SVTC-Solar-Scorecard.Pdf
    A PROJECT OF THE SILICON VALLEY TOXICS COALITION 2015 SOLAR SCORECARD ‘‘ www.solarscorecard.com ‘‘ SVTC’s Vision The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) believes that we still have time to ensure that the PV sector is safe The PV industry’s rapid growth makes for the environment, workers, and communities. SVTC it critical that all solar companies envisions a safe and sustainable solar PV industry that: maintain the highest sustainability standards. 1) Takes responsibility for the environmental and health impacts of its products throughout their life- cycles, including adherence to a mandatory policy for ‘‘The Purpose responsible recycling. The Scorecard is a resource for consumers, institutional purchasers, investors, installers, and anyone who wants 2) Implements and monitors equitable environmental to purchase PV modules from responsible product and labor standards throughout product supply chains. stewards. The Scorecard reveals how companies perform on SVTC’s sustainability and social justice benchmarks 3) Pursues innovative approaches to reducing and to ensure that the PV manufacturers protect workers, work towards eliminating toxic chemicals in PV mod- communities, and the environment. The PV industry’s ule manufacturing. continued growth makes it critical to take action now to reduce the use of toxic chemicals, develop responsible For over three decades, SVTC has been a leader in recycling systems, and protect workers throughout glob- encouraging electronics manufacturers to take lifecycle al PV supply chains. Many PV companies want to pro- responsibility for their products. This includes protecting duce truly clean and green energy systems and are taking workers from toxic exposure and preventing hazardous steps to implement more sustainable practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan Whitcomb General Manager, Solar Star Project October 18, 2016 Topics Covered
    Solar Power and the Future Bryan Whitcomb General Manager, Solar Star Project October 18, 2016 Topics Covered • Berkshire Hathaway Energy (BHE) introduction • Solar Technologies – Photovoltaic (PV) and Concentrated PV – Concentrated – Emerging technologies • Solar Star – Large utility-scale solar PV project • Energy Trends • Solar energy trends 2 Berkshire Hathaway Energy • 11.5 million customers worldwide • 21,000 employees worldwide • $85.0 billion in assets • $18.1 billion in revenue • 32,600 miles of transmission lines • 16,400 miles of natural gas pipeline • More than 33,000 MW owned/contracted generation capacity • 34% renewable or noncarbon • Largest regulated owner of wind (5500 MW) in US BHE Renewables Unregulated Independent Power Producer (IPP) Geothermal Wind Solar Hydro Imperial Valley Projects: 338 MW Bishop Hill II: 81 MW Agua Caliente: 290 MW Wailuku: 10 MW Pinyon Pines: 300 MW Topaz Solar Farms: 550 MW Philippines: 128 MW Jumbo Road: 300 MW Solar Star: 586 MW Grande Prairie: 400 MW Marshall: 72 MW 338 MW geothermal 1,153 MW wind 1,278 MW solar 138 MW hydro 4 Solar Technology – Photovoltaic 5 Solar Technology – Concentrated Photovoltaic 6 Solar PV Plant Overview Power Conversion Station (PCS) – each PCS has 2 inverters and 1 transformer Common electrical hardware for all electrical energy technologies 7 Concentrated Solar Power 8 Concentrated Solar Power 9 Concentrated Solar – Ivanpah (Primm, NV) 10 Emerging Solar Technologies • Concentrator PV • Floatovoltaics • Energy Storage – Electrochemical (batteries) – Mechanical
    [Show full text]
  • Thin-Film Cigs on Flexible Plastic Substrate
    THIN-FILM CIGS ON FLEXIBLE PLASTIC SUBSTRATE Victor Lee, President & CEO COPYRIGHT © 2017 Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. 12/1/2017 CONFIDENTIAL 1 Safe Harbor Statement In addition to historical information, this presentation contains forward–looking statements that are based on assumptions made by management regarding future circumstances over which the company may have little or no control and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward–looking statements. Please note that these forward- looking statements reflect our opinions only as of the date of this publication and we undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events. Please refer to our SEC filings for a more detailed description of the risk factors that may affect our results. These documents are available at our website, www.ascentsolar.com, and at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. COPYRIGHT © 2017 Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. 12/1/2017 CONFIDENTIAL 2 Who Are We? . Leading provider of flexible & lightweight thin-film solar modules specially designed for the Space/Near-space, Drone/UAV, Military, Transportation, Off-grid and Consumer Markets . Corporate Vision: To deliver Clean and Innovative Power Solution for Everyone Everywhere . Revolutionary and Proprietary flexible solar technology based on CIGS (Copper-Indium- Gallium-Selenium) on Plastic substrate COPYRIGHT © 2017 Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. 12/1/2017 CONFIDENTIAL 3 Company Snapshot . Founded: Incorporated in 2005; IPO in July 2006 . Headquarters: Thornton, Colorado (~139,000 sf of production, warehouse and office space) .
    [Show full text]
  • | 360 W Residential Solar Panel
    | 360 W Residential Solar Panel SunPower Maxeon panels combine high efficiency with the strongest durability and warranty available in the market today, resulting in more long-term energy and savings. 1,2 Maximum Power. Minimalist Design. High efficiency means more power and savings per available space. With fewer panels required, less is truly more. More Lifetime Energy and Savings Designed to deliver 45% more energy in the same space over 25 years in real-world conditions like partial shade and high 2 temperatures. 140% 130% 120% 110% SunPower Up to Maxeon Panels 45% 100% More 90% Lifetime Fundamentally Different. Energy Conventional Panel And Better. 80% 70% 25-year Energy Yield per Watt 0 5 10 15 20 25 Years of Operation Better Reliability, Better Warranty The SunPower Maxeon® Solar Cell With more than 25 million panels deployed around Enables highest efficiency panels the world, SunPower technology is proven to last. 2 available That’s why we stand behind our panel with an 3 Unmatched reliability exceptional 25-year Combined Power and Product Patented solid metal foundation Warranty, including the highest Power Warranty in prevents breakage and corrosion solar. 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% SunPower 90% 12% 88% Maxeon Panels More 86% Conventional Panel Power As Sustainable As Its Energy 84% in Year Ranked #1 in Silicon Valley Toxics 82% 25 Warranted Panel Power 80% Coalition Solar Scorecard 4 0 5 10 15 20 25 First solar panels to achieve Cradle to Years of Operation Cradle Certified™ Silver recognition 5, pending Contributes to more
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges
    Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis Suggested Citation Smith, Brittany L., and Robert Margolis. (2019). Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-73363. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73363.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunpower Corporation 2016 Annual Report
    SUNPOWER 2016 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2016 SUNPOWER Corporate Headquarters SunPower Corporation 77 Rio Robles San Jose, California 95134 408.240.5500 sunpower.com Annual Report 2016 ©2017 SunPower Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SUNPOWER, the SUNPOWER logo, and all other trademarks cited herein are the property of SunPower Corporation in the U.S. and other countries as well. Executive Officers Thomas H. Werner President, CEO and Chairman of the Board Changing the Way Our World is Powered Charles D. Boynton With more than 30 years of proven experience, Executive Vice President SunPower is a global leader in solar innovation and and Chief Financial Officer sustainability. Our unique approach emphasizes Ken Mahaffey the seamless integration of advanced SunPower Executive Vice President technologies, delivering The Power of OneTM and General Counsel complete solar solutions and lasting customer Dr. Bill Mulligan value. SunPower delivers outstanding service Executive Vice President and impressive electricity cost savings for Global Operations residential, commercial and Douglas J. Richards power plant customers. Executive Vice President Administration At SunPower, we are passionately committed to changing the way our Board of Directors world is powered. And as Thomas H. Werner we continue shaping the Chairman of the Board future of Smart Energy, we are guided by our legacy Helle Kristoffersen Director of innovation, optimism, perseverance and integrity. Daniel Lauré Director Headquartered in Silicon Valley, Catherine Lesjak SunPower has about 7,000 dedicated, Director customer-focused employees in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South Thomas R. McDaniel Director America. Since 2011, we’ve been majority-owned by Total, the fourth largest* publicly-listed energy Ladislas Paszkiewicz company in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • REC's SOLAR MARKET INSIGHT
    REC’S SOLAR MARKET INSIGHT Q4 2016 / Full-year 2016 Major REC Highlights from 2016 • REC celebrated its 20th anniversary – having grown from a pioneer in solar to world leader • New record efficiency of 20.46% achieved for multicrystalline solar cell manufactured at REC – above 20% to be in mass production in 2017 • In Q3 2016, REC officially opened of Herøya ingot plant with Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg cutting the ribbon • REC accelerated the conversion from REC Peak Energy to REC TwinPeak and will be introducing a mono product in 2017 • Successful launch of REC’s new 72-cell version of the award-winning REC TwinPeak Series, rated up to 340 Wp • REC ranked as the #1 most popular brand of modules for homes in California and #2 most popular brand of modules for homes throughout entire U.S.1 • In US, Q3 2016 completion of 257 MW utility project in California on 1,900 acres of retired agricultural land • REC has doubled its market share in Germany in 2016 compared to 2015, reaching approximately 13% • In Q4 2016, REC achieved one of the strongest quarters in sales volume in its history 1 Based on Q1-Q3 2016, published December 2016 2 Table of contents 1 Global Performance – Q4 2016 / FY 2016 2 REC Highlights – Q4 2016 3 Regional Performance – Q4 2016 4 Product and Technology Highlights 3 Major REC Q4 2016 Highlights • Q4 2016 was one of the strongest quarters for sales volume in REC history o Best quarter ever for REC in EMEA o 2nd-best quarter ever for REC in APAC1 o 2nd-best quarter ever for REC worldwide • REC maintains leading rankings: o #1 most popular brand of solar panels for homes in California o #2 most popular brand of solar panels for homes in entire U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Project Description
    2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014. Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-9 CUP 13-0039 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-20 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-10 CUP 13-0040 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-21 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-11 CUP 13-0041 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-22 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-12 CUP 13-0042 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-23 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-13 CUP 13-0043 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-24 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-14 CUP 13-0044 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-25 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-15 CUP 13-0045 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-26 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's 50 Largest Operational Solar Power Plants
    The world’s 50 largest operational solar power plants The world’s 50 largest operational solar power plants Capacity Country Plant name Year Developers Owners PPAs (MW) opened 2250 India Bhadla Solar Park 2020 Rajasthan Solar Park National Thermal Pow- Development Company, er Corporation (NTPC), (RSPDCL), Saurya Urja Company Solar Energy Corpora- of Rajasthan, Adani Renewable tion of India (SECI) Energy Park Rajasthan 2000 India Pavagada Solar Park - 2019 Karnataka Solar Power Karnataka Solar Power Shakti Sthala Development Corporation Limit- Development Corporation ed (KSPDCL) Limited (KSPDCL) 1963 UAE Mohammed bin 2019 ACWA Power, The Silk Road Dubai Electricity and Water Dubai Electricity Rashid Al Maktoum Fund, China’s Shanghai Authority (DEWA) and Water Authority Solar Park Electric, Masdar, (DEWA) Shuaa Energy 2, EDF Energies Nouvelles 1800 Egypt Benban Solar Park 2019 Alcazar Energy, IB Vogt, Scatec Egyptian Electricity Egyptian Electricity Solar, Shapoorji Transmission Company (EETC) Transmission Pallonji Company (EETC) 1547 China Tengger Desert Solar 2014 China National Grid China National Grid Zhongwei Park Zhongwei Power Supply Co. Power Supply Co. 1508 Mexico Enel Villanueva PV 2018 Enel Enel Centro Nacional de Plant Control de Energía (CENACE) 1177 UAE Sweihan Photovoltaic 2019 Sweihan Solar Holding Company Marubeni and JinkoSolar Abu Dhabi Water and Independent Power Electricity Company Project (ADWEC) 1000 China Yanchi Solar PV 2016 Minsheng New Energy Minsheng New Energy Station 1 The world’s 50 largest operational solar
    [Show full text]
  • PG&E Signs Historic 800 MW Photovoltaic Solar Power
    PG&E Signs Historic 800 MW Photovoltaic Solar Power Agreements With OptiSolar and SunPower Solar Projects Would Supply Enough Renewable Energy Equivalent to the Energy Needs of 239,000 Californian Homes SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 14, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX News Network/ -- Pacific Gas and Electric Company today announced it has entered into two utility-scale, photovoltaic (PV) solar power contracts for a total of 800 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy. This significant commitment to photovoltaic technology will deliver cumulatively 1.65 billion kilowatt-hours of renewable energy annually. This would be equivalent to the amount of energy needed to serve approximately 239,000 residential homes each year. PG&E entered into an agreement with Topaz Solar Farms LLC, a subsidiary of OptiSolar Inc., for 550 MW of thin-film PV solar power. The utility also signed a contract with High Plains Ranch II, LLC, a subsidiary of SunPower Corporation (Nasdaq: SPWR), for 250 MW of high-efficiency PV solar power. "These landmark agreements signal the arrival of utility-scale PV solar power that may be cost-competitive with solar thermal and wind energy," said Jack Keenan, chief operating officer and senior vice president for PG&E. "We will continue to explore such innovative technologies as we aggressively work to increase the amount of renewable energy we provide our customers." Utility-scale PV solar projects feature photovoltaic solar modules, which convert sunlight directly into electricity and produce the greatest amounts of power during the afternoons, when electricity demand is high. Both projects are contingent upon the extension of the federal investment tax credit for renewable energy and processes to expedite transmission needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The California ISO Controlled Grid Generation Queue for All: Active
    Report Run Date: 10/06/2021 The California ISO Controlled Grid Generation Queue for All: Active Deliverability Generating Facility Net MWs to Grid Status Location Point of Interconnection Study Availability System Off-Peak Feasibility Facilities Study Interconnection Full Capacity, Station or Proposed Impact Study Interconnection Application Study Deliverability Current Study or (FAS) or Optional Study Project Name Queue Position Request Queue Date Partial or Energy County State Utility Transmission On-line Date or Agreement Status Process and Economic On-line Date Supplemental Phase II Cluster (OS) MW-1 MW-2 Only (FC/P/EO) Fuel-1 Fuel-2 Receive Date Type-1 Type-2 Line (as filed with IR) Phase I Status Only Review Study MW Total Cluster Study TULE WIND 32 5/12/2004 5/24/2004 ACTIVE Serial LGIP Wind Turbine Wind 193.80 193.80 Partial Capacity Off-Peak SAN DIEGO CA SDGE Boulevard East 9/1/2007 12/31/2022 Waived Complete Complete None Executed Turbin Deliverability Substation 138kV e LAKE ELSINORE ADVANCED 72 4/26/2005 6/21/2005 ACTIVE Serial LGIP Storage Pump 500 500 Full Capacity Off-Peak RIVERSIDE CA SDGE Proposed Lee 12/31/2008 12/31/2028 Waived Complete Re-Study None Executed PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT ed- Deliverability Lake Substation Stora 500kV ge hydro SANDSTORM WIND POWER 138 10/23/2006 10/23/2006 ACTIVE Serial LGIP Wind Turbine Stora Wind Batter 60 90 150 Partial Capacity Off-Peak RIVERSIDE CA SCE Devers-Vista #1 12/31/2008 12/31/2021 Waived Complete Complete None Executed ge Turbin y Deliverability 230kV e DESERT SUNLIGHT PV I (FKA
    [Show full text]