DOCSLIB.ORG

Perspectives on Science and Culture Kris Rutten

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perspectives on Science and Culture Kris Rutten Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Purdue University Press Books Purdue University Press Winter 2-15-2018 Perspectives on Science and Culture Kris Rutten Stefaan Blancke Ronald Soetaert Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Rutten, Kris, Blancke, Stefaan, and Soetaert, Ronald. Perspectives on Science and Culture (2018). Purdue University Press. (Knowledge Unlatched Open Access Edition.) This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Perspectives on Science and Culture Comparative Cultural Studies Ari Ofengenden, Series Editor The series examines how cultural practices, especially contemporary creative media, both shape and themselves are shaped by current global developments such as the digitization of culture, virtual reality, global interconnectedness, increased people flows, transhumanism, environmental degradation, and new forms of subjectivi- ties. We aim to publish manuscripts that cross disciplines and national borders in order to provide deep insights into these issues. Perspectives on Science and Culture Edited by Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert Purdue University Press West Lafayette, Indiana Copyright 2018 by Purdue University. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Cataloging-in-Publication data is on file at the Library of Congress. Paperback ISBN: 978-1-55753-797-3 ePDF ISBN: 978-1-61249-521-7 ePUB ISBN: 978-1-61249-522-4 An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-1-55753-821-5. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www .knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover image: “The man who measures the clouds” by Jan Fabre / Copyright: Angelos bvba / Photo: Elisabeth Soetaert Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction Perspectives on Science and Culture ix Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert Part 1: Narrative and Rhetorical Perspectives 1 Chapter 1 Experiencing Nature through Cable Television 3 David J. Tietge Chapter 2 Steven Pinker and the Scientific Sublime: How a New Category of Experience Transformed Popular Science 19 Alan G. Gross Chapter 3 Architectonic Discourses and Their Extremisms 39 Barry Brummett Chapter 4 Science and the Idea of Culture 53 Richard van Oort Chapter 5 A Rhetorical Analysis of the Two Cultures in Literary Fiction 67 Ronald Soetaert and Kris Rutten Chapter 6 The Missing Link and Human Origins: Understanding an Evolutionary Icon 89 Peter C. Kjærgaard Part 2: Cognitive Perspectives 107 Chapter 7 Suspicion toward Science and the Role of Automatic Intuitions about Origins 109 Elisa Järnefelt Chapter 8 Bridging the Gap: From Intuitive to Scientific Reasoning — The Case of Evolution 131 E. Margaret Evans Chapter 9 Missing Links: How Cladograms Reify Common Evolutionary Misconceptions 149 Andrew Shtulman Chapter 10 Representations of the Origin of Species in Secular (France) and Religious (Morocco) Contexts 171 Dominique Guillo Part 3: Epistemological Perspectives 193 Chapter 11 Updating Evolutionary Epistemology 195 Christophe Heintz Chapter 12 Intuitions in Science Education and the Public Understanding of Science 223 Stefaan Blancke, Koen B. Tanghe, and Johan Braeckman Chapter 13 Vindicating Science — By Bringing It Down 243 Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci Part 4: Thematic Bibliography 259 Thematic Bibliography of Publications on Different Perspectives on Science and Culture 261 Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert Index 271 Acknowledgments We thank Purdue University Press for its interest in our work and support to publish Perspectives on Science & Culture, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, for- mer series editor, for his encouragement to pursue this project. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their valuable comments. Stefaan Blancke acknowledges the financial support of Ghent University (BOF13/24J/089) and the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO, project number G001013N). Finally, we would like to thank the authors for their valu- able contributions. vii Introduction Perspectives on Science and Culture Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert This edited volume in the Comparative Cultural Studies Series explores the intersection between scientific understanding and cultural representation from an interdisciplinary perspective. The contributions in this volume analyze pop- ular representations of science and scientific discourse from the perspectives of rhetorical criticism, comparative cultural studies, narratology, educational stud- ies, discourse analysis, the cognitive sciences, and naturalized and evolutionary epistemology. As such, the volume fits within the theoretical and methodolog- ical framework of comparative cultural studies as a contextual approach to the study of culture from an interdisciplinary perspective. The main objective of this volume is to explore how particular cognitive predispositions and cultural representations both shape and distort the public debate about scientific con- troversies, the teaching and learning of science, and the development of science itself. Theoretically, this volume will integrate, on the one hand, C. P. Snow’s concept of the two cultures (science versus the humanities) and Jerome Bruner’s confrontation between narrative and logico-scientific modes of thinking and, on the other hand, cognitive and epistemological approaches to human cognition and culture, including science. From this unique conciliatory framework, the volume explores how narra- tives and other cultural representations transform complex scientific issues into digestible bits of information based on particular selections and deflections. Some of the contributions analyze how scientific representations and metaphors of science take shape in pictures, cartoons, and television broadcasts, but also in novels and popular magazines. Others specifically focus on the implications of these representations and (mis)understandings for science education, both in ix x Introduction formal and informal educational settings. Thematically, the contributions focus on a wide range of current debates about evolutionary theory, global warming, genetic modification, and so on. As such, it indirectly engages with discussions pertaining to the politics of science. The aim of this volume is to engage in the ongoing debate about the public understanding of science and is original in its interdisciplinary scope, ranging from philosophy, cognitive psychology, anthro- pology, and biology to literature, cultural studies, and rhetoric. Public Understanding of Science There has been increasing attention on the valorization of scientific research, in combination with a growing public debate about the uses and applications of sci- entific findings for social and economic purposes (Benneworth and Jongbloed). Media coverage of scientific findings plays an important role in shaping the public understanding of science and as such creates a context for socio-ethical debates about the application and development of scientific research (van Dijck). However, the communication of science is always, inevitably partial and this partiality raises issues of authority, creates potential misunderstandings, and complicates the public debate about science (Tietge). One of the main aims of science communication and programs aimed at increasing scientific literacy is to create a better public understanding of science and to emphasize its wider rele- vance to society (Gross, “Roles”). Science communication often consists of a one-way flow from scientists to the general public by accommodating scientific findings to a nonexpert audience. Such a unilateral approach is indeed important for transferring relevant scientific knowledge to society but runs the risk of disregarding the contexts that give sci- ence its public significance and the ambiguities that arise from particular framings in the public debate (Gross, “Roles” and Rhetoric). Public concerns and opinions from stakeholders are often seen as (unwarranted) anxieties or vested interests rather than “assets” that have a role to play in the debate about scientific develop- ments and applications (Bauer; Bauer, Shukla and Allum). There is an entangled and reciprocal relationship between science and society and therefore there is a need for a better understanding of the accommodation of scientific findings from experts to lay audiences, for an understanding of the different positions in the sci- entific and the public debate, and for an integration of scientific developments and the needs of society (Fahnestock; Gross, “Roles” and Rhetoric; Tietge, Rational). For example, there is an ongoing body of research on the public under- standing of genetics. Although there have been vast scientific advances in DNA Perspectives on Science and Culture xi technology, the socio-ethical and the legal and political debates still remain very contested and ambivalent. In her seminal work, Imagenation, José van Dijck has shown that the public imagination of genetics has undergone an important trans- formation during the decades that this branch of scientific research took shape, as the synopsis of her
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Two Cultures of Undergraduate Academic Engagement
    Res High Educ DOI 10.1007/s11162-008-9090-y The Two Cultures of Undergraduate Academic Engagement Steven Brint Æ Allison M. Cantwell Æ Robert A. Hanneman Received: 11 June 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract Using data on upper-division students in the University of California system, we show that two distinct cultures of engagement exist on campus. The culture of engagement in the arts, humanities and social sciences focuses on interaction, participation, and interest in ideas. The culture of engagement in the natural sciences and engineering focuses on improvement of quantitative skills through collaborative study with an eye to rewards in the labor market. The two cultures of engagement are strongly associated with post-graduate degree plans. The findings raise questions about normative conceptions of good educational practices in so far as they are considered to be equally relevant to students in all higher education institutions and all major fields of study. Keywords Academic engagement Á Student cultures Á Research universities Á Graduate degree aspirations Considerable scholarly and policy attention has been directed toward the improvement of undergraduate education for more than two decades (see, e.g., AAC 1985; Chickering and Gamson 1987). Yet interest appears to have peaked in recent years, as indicated by large- scale improvement efforts at many of the country’s leading research universities (see, e.g., Rimer 2007). The most important cause of this heightened interest is the report of the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education (also known as the Spellings Commission). The Spellings Commission proposed incentives for the adoption of stan- dardized testing for purposes of making higher education accountable to consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Two Cultures” in Clinical Psychology: Constructing Disciplinary Divides in the Management of Mental Retardation
    The “Two Cultures” in Clinical Psychology: Constructing Disciplinary Divides in the Management of Mental Retardation Andrew J. Hogan Creighton University Isis, Vol. 109, no. 4 (2018): 695-719 In a 1984 article, psychologist Gregory Kimble lamented what he saw as the two distinct cultures of his discipline. Writing in American Psychologist, a prominent professional journal, he noted, “In psychology, these conflicting cultures [scientific and humanistic] exist within a single field, and those who hold opposing values are currently engaged in a bitter family feud.” 1 In making his argument, Kimble explicitly drew upon British scientist and novelist C.P. Snow’s 1959 lecture The Two Cultures, in which Snow expressed concern about a lack of intellectual engagement between scientists and humanists, and about the dominant position of the humanities in British education and culture. Kimble used Snow’s critique to help make sense of what he perceived to be a similar polarizing divide between “scientific” and “humanistic” psychologists. 2 As Kimble described it, humanistic psychologists differed form their scientific colleagues in placing their ambitions to enact certain social policies and to promote particular social values- based ideologies ahead of the need for the scientific validation of these approaches. Kimble demonstrated his purported two cultures divide in psychology using survey data he collected from 164 American Psychological Association (APA) members. Each was part of either APA Division 3 (Experimental Psychology) or one of three other Divisions, which represented special interest groups within the psychology field. His results, illustrated on a spectrum from scientific to humanistic orientation, showed a purported divide between experimental psychologists on the scientific side, and their humanistic colleagues in the other three Divisions (See Figures 1,2).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Why Darwin Matters Matters Why Darwin Matters: the Case Against Intelligent Design, by Michael Shermer
    Evo Edu Outreach DOI 10.1007/s12052-008-0109-9 BOOK REVIEW Why Why Darwin Matters Matters Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design, by Michael Shermer. New York: Henry Holt, 2006. Pp. xxii + 199. S/b $14.00 Tania Lombrozo # The Author(s) 2008. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com The first decade of the twenty-first century will be a curious a brief but lucid overview of key evolutionary ideas. He chapter in the future history of evolutionary thought. In emphasizes that the source of resistance to evolution is rarely 2005, resistance to evolution manifested in the highly the scientific details but rather the perceived consequences of publicized trial of Dover, Pennsylvania over teaching evolution: atheism, ethical nihilism, and a lack of meaning. Intelligent Design in public schools. Only four years later, What people care about “is whether teaching evolution will in 2009, universities, museums, and individuals across the make their kids reject God, allow criminals and sinners to globe celebrate the 150th anniversary of the publication of blame their genes for their actions, and generally cause society Darwin’s Origin of Species. Released in the interlude, to fall apart” (p. 25). But according to Shermer, an even Michael Shermer’s Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against greater threat to the theory of evolution is misunderstanding. Intelligent Design takes on the challenge these landmark A large proportion of the public not only misunderstands dates represent: how a thoroughly vetted and accepted evolutionary theory but also aspects of science and the scientific theory can be the source of so much cultural scientific process—for example, that calling evolution a conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Hwa-Byung:The
    FROM THE INSTRUCTOR In his prize-winning essay, “Hwa-Byung: The “Han”-Blessed Illness,” Wooyoung Cho taps a global skill set to shed new light on how culture shapes definitions of mental illness. His paper is an outstanding example of student-driven inquiry. I had never heard of the Korean culture-bound mental illness called hwa-byung when Wooyoung proposed this project. But even if I had, I would’ve had no idea where to find narratives about hwa-byung written by young men, let alone be able to translate them from Korean. (Are you curious yet?) In his research, Wooyoung learned that scholarly studies of hwa-byung have focused on middle-aged women and interpreted their symptoms as reflections of Korea’s patriarchal social structure. When he discovered that today more young men are being diagnosed with hwa-byung, he wanted to understand the social causes of their distress. One way he gathered evidence was by searching a Korean online forum and reading posts by young men about their hwa-byung experiences. When students in Marisa Milanese’s “Global Documentary” class read a draft of Wooyoung’s essay in a cross-section peer review exercise, they were understandably skeptical about his methodology. They asked for “a clearer understanding of why analyzing narratives is a credible method to gain insight into this illness.” Wooyoung responded with a revision that provided the theoretical framework necessary to explain the kind of authority those anonymous online posts have in the context of his project. He was wise to listen carefully to his readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Misunderstandings About Evolution a Very Brief Guide for the Curious and the Confused by Dr
    Ten Misunderstandings About Evolution A Very Brief Guide for the Curious and the Confused By Dr. Mike Webster, Dept. of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University ([email protected]); February 2010 The current debate over evolution and “intelligent design” (ID) is being driven by a relatively small group of individuals who object to the theory of evolution for religious reasons. The debate is fueled, though, by misunderstandings on the part of the American public about what evolutionary biology is and what it says. These misunderstandings are exploited by proponents of ID, intentionally or not, and are often echoed in the media. In this booklet I briefly outline and explain 10 of the most common (and serious) misunderstandings. It is impossible to treat each point thoroughly in this limited space; I encourage you to read further on these topics and also by visiting the websites given on the resource sheet. In addition, I am happy to send a somewhat expanded version of this booklet to anybody who is interested – just send me an email to ask for one! What are the misunderstandings? 1. Evolution is progressive improvement of species Evolution, particularly human evolution, is often pictured in textbooks as a string of organisms marching in single file from “simple” organisms (usually a single celled organism or a monkey) on one side of the page and advancing to “complex” organisms on the opposite side of the page (almost invariably a human being). We have all seen this enduring image and likely have some version of it burned into our brains.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research Communication Studies, Department of Spring 4-12-2011 Secular Salvation: Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement Brent Yergensen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss Part of the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Yergensen, Brent, "Secular Salvation: Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement" (2011). Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. 6. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SECULAR SALVATION: SACRED RHETORICAL INVENTION IN THE STRING THEORY MOVEMENT by Brent Yergensen A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Communication Studies Under the Supervision of Dr. Ronald Lee Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2011 ii SECULAR SALVATION: SACRED RHETORICAL INVENTION IN THE STRING THEORY MOVEMENT Brent Yergensen, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2011 Advisor: Ronald Lee String theory is argued by its proponents to be the Theory of Everything. It achieves this status in physics because it provides unification for contradictory laws of physics, namely quantum mechanics and general relativity. While based on advanced theoretical mathematics, its public discourse is growing in prevalence and its rhetorical power is leading to a scientific revolution, even among the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "Critical Analysis of Evolution"; Innovative Lesson Plan Or
    THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION L10H23 “CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EVOLUTION”; INNOVATIVE LESSON PLAN OR STEALTHY ADVOCACY TOOL? Robert Day, The Ohio State University. Presented at the National Association of Researchers of Science Teaching (NARST) annual conference, San Francisco, CA. April 2006. Abstract: This paper will discuss the ongoing controversy surrounding a particular Ohio Department of Education tenth grade lesson plan titled “Critical Analysis of Evolution” (Ohio Department of Education identification L10H23). The lesson professes to encourage students to “critically examine” evidences for and against evolution and invites them to discuss definitions of some common evolutionary terms and concepts. Proponents insist that this lesson is a thought-provoking exercise in critical thinking and scientific objectively. Critics claim that the lesson is at best, unscientific and at worst, a thinly-veiled attempt to introduce creationist ideas into the classroom in accordance with the so-called “wedge” strategy of certain pro-creationist organizations. A complicating factor is that this lesson plan has been used as the subject of graduate level research on the effect of teaching “the evolution controversy” to Ohio students, and subsequently, this research has been used to support similar initiatives in state hearings outside of Ohio. We will present the findings from a series of surveys conducted with life-science high school teachers, college faculty, and graduate students intended to establish whether or not practicing scientists and science educators agree with the Ohio Board of Education’s assessment that “there is no ID [intelligent design] there”. We will look for trends in the opinions of different sub-populations, identify key differences of opinions between participants and Ohio Board of Education members and suggest possible reasons for any apparent conflicts of opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong/By Jonathan Wells
    ON SCIENCE OR MYTH? Whymuch of what we teach about evolution is wrong Icons ofEvolution About the Author Jonathan Wells is no stranger to controversy. After spending two years in the U.S. Ar my from 1964 to 1966, he entered the University of California at Berkeley to become a science teacher. When the Army called him back from reser ve status in 1968, he chose to go to prison rather than continue to serve during the Vietnam War. He subsequently earned a Ph.D. in religious studies at Yale University, where he wrote a book about the nineteenth­ century Darwinian controversies. In 1989 he returned to Berkeley to earn a second Ph.D., this time in molecular and cell biology. He is now a senior fellow at Discovery Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture (www.discovery.org/ crsc) in Seattle, where he lives with his wife, two children, and mother. He still hopes to become a science teacher. Icons ofEvolution Science or Myth? Why Much oJWhat We TeachAbout Evolution Is Wrong JONATHAN WELLS ILLUSTRATED BY JODY F. SJOGREN IIIIDIDIREGNERY 11MPUBLISHING, INC. An EaglePublishing Company • Washington, IX Copyright © 2000 by Jonathan Wells All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or trans­ mitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including pho­ tocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, or broadcast.
    [Show full text]
  • C.P. Snow the REDE LECTURE, 1959
    C.P. Snow THE REDE LECTURE, 1959 © Cambridge University Press 1 THE TWO CULTURES It is about three years since I made a sketch in print of a problem which had been on my mind for some time. 1 It was a problem I could not avoid just because of the circumstances of my life. The only credentials I had to ruminate on the subject at all came through those circumstances, through nothing more than a set of chances. Anyone with similar experience would have seen much the same things and I think made very much the same comments about them. It just happened to be an unusual experience. By training I was a scientist: by vocation I was a writer. That was all. It was a piece of luck, if you like, that arose through coming from a poor home. But my personal history isn't the point now. All that I need say is that I came to Cambridge and did a bit of research here at a time of major scientific activity. I was privileged to have a ringside view of one of the most wonderful creative periods in all physics. And it happened through the flukes of war— including meeting W. L. Bragg in the buffet on Kettering station on a very cold morning in 1939, which had a determining influence on my practical life—that I was able, and indeed morally forced, to keep that ringside view ever since. So for thirty years I have had to be in touch with scientists not only out of curiosity, but as part of a working existence.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Emotions Past, Present, Future Historia De Las Emociones: Pasado, Presente Y Futuro a História Das Emoções: Passado, Presente E Futuro
    Revista de Estudios Sociales 62 | Octubre 2017 Comunidades emocionales y cambio social The History of Emotions Past, Present, Future Historia de las emociones: pasado, presente y futuro A história das emoções: passado, presente e futuro Rob Boddice Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/revestudsoc/939 ISSN: 1900-5180 Publisher Universidad de los Andes Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2017 Number of pages: 10-15 ISSN: 0123-885X Electronic reference Rob Boddice, “The History of Emotions”, Revista de Estudios Sociales [Online], 62 | Octubre 2017, Online since 01 October 2017, connection on 04 May 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ revestudsoc/939 Los contenidos de la Revista de Estudios Sociales están editados bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. 10 The History of Emotions: Past, Present, Future* Rob Boddice** Received date: May 30, 2017 · Acceptance date: June 10, 2017 · Modification date: June 26, 2017 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7440/res62.2017.02 Como citar: Boddice, Rob. 2017. “The History of Emotions: Past, Present, Future”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 62: 10-15. https:// dx.doi.org/10.7440/res62.2017.02 ABSTRACT | This article briefly appraises the state of the art in the history of emotions, lookingto its theoretical and methodological underpinnings and some of the notable scholarship in the contemporary field. The predominant focus, however, lies on the future direction of the history of emotions, based on a convergence of the humanities and neuros- ciences, and
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Portable Microbial Samplers for Estimating Inhalation Exposure to Viable Biological Agents
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2007) 17, 31–38 r 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1559-0631/07/$30.00 www.nature.com/jes Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents MAOSHENG YAO AND GEDIMINAS MAINELIS Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8551, USA Portable microbial samplers are being increasingly used to determine the presence ofmicrobial agents in the air; however, their performance charac teristics when sampling airborne biological agents are largely unknown. In addition, it is unknown whether these samplers could be used to assess microbial inhalation exposure according to the particle sampling conventions. This research analyzed collection efficiencies of MAS-100, Microflow, SMA MicroPortable, Millipore Air Tester, SAS Super 180, BioCulture, and RCS High Flow portable microbial samplers when sampling six bacterial and fungal species ranging from 0.61 to 3.14mm in aerodynamic diameter. The efficiencies with which airborne microorganisms were deposited on samplers’ collection medium were compared to the particle inhalation and lung deposition convention curves. When sampling fungi, RCS High Flow and SAS Super 180 deposited 80%–90% ofairborne spores on agar F highest among investigated samplers. Other samplers showed collection efficiencies of 10%–60%. When collecting bacteria, RCS High Flow and MAS-100 collected 20%–30%, whereas other samplers collected less than 10% ofthese bioparticles. Comparison ofsamplers’ collection efficiencies with particle inhalation convention curves showed that RCS High Flow and SAS Super 18 0 could be used to assess inhalation exposure to particles larger than 2.5 mm, such as fungal spores.
    [Show full text]