General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Martian Crater Morphology
ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter. -
Widespread Crater-Related Pitted Materials on Mars: Further Evidence for the Role of Target Volatiles During the Impact Process ⇑ Livio L
Icarus 220 (2012) 348–368 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Widespread crater-related pitted materials on Mars: Further evidence for the role of target volatiles during the impact process ⇑ Livio L. Tornabene a, , Gordon R. Osinski a, Alfred S. McEwen b, Joseph M. Boyce c, Veronica J. Bray b, Christy M. Caudill b, John A. Grant d, Christopher W. Hamilton e, Sarah Mattson b, Peter J. Mouginis-Mark c a University of Western Ontario, Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7 b University of Arizona, Lunar and Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c University of Hawai’i, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Ma¯noa, HI 96822, USA d Smithsonian Institution, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA e NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA article info abstract Article history: Recently acquired high-resolution images of martian impact craters provide further evidence for the Received 28 August 2011 interaction between subsurface volatiles and the impact cratering process. A densely pitted crater-related Revised 29 April 2012 unit has been identified in images of 204 craters from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. This sample of Accepted 9 May 2012 craters are nearly equally distributed between the two hemispheres, spanning from 53°Sto62°N latitude. Available online 24 May 2012 They range in diameter from 1 to 150 km, and are found at elevations between À5.5 to +5.2 km relative to the martian datum. The pits are polygonal to quasi-circular depressions that often occur in dense clus- Keywords: ters and range in size from 10 m to as large as 3 km. -
Crater Geometry and Ejecta Thickness of the Martian Impact Crater Tooting
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42, Nr 9, 1615–1625 (2007) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Crater geometry and ejecta thickness of the Martian impact crater Tooting Peter J. MOUGINIS-MARK and Harold GARBEIL Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822, USA (Received 25 October 2006; revision accepted 04 March 2007) Abstract–We use Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) topographic data and Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) visible (VIS) images to study the cavity and the ejecta blanket of a very fresh Martian impact crater ~29 km in diameter, with the provisional International Astronomical Union (IAU) name Tooting crater. This crater is very young, as demonstrated by the large depth/ diameter ratio (0.065), impact melt preserved on the walls and floor, an extensive secondary crater field, and only 13 superposed impact craters (all 54 to 234 meters in diameter) on the ~8120 km2 ejecta blanket. Because the pre-impact terrain was essentially flat, we can measure the volume of the crater cavity and ejecta deposits. Tooting crater has a rim height that has >500 m variation around the rim crest and a very large central peak (1052 m high and >9 km wide). Crater cavity volume (i.e., volume below the pre-impact terrain) is ~380 km3 and the volume of materials above the pre-impact terrain is ~425 km3. The ejecta thickness is often very thin (<20 m) throughout much of the ejecta blanket. There is a pronounced asymmetry in the ejecta blanket, suggestive of an oblique impact, which has resulted in up to ~100 m of additional ejecta thickness being deposited down-range compared to the up-range value at the same radial distance from the rim crest. -
16. Ice in the Martian Regolith
16. ICE IN THE MARTIAN REGOLITH S. W. SQUYRES Cornell University S. M. CLIFFORD Lunar and Planetary Institute R. O. KUZMIN V.I. Vernadsky Institute J. R. ZIMBELMAN Smithsonian Institution and F. M. COSTARD Laboratoire de Geographie Physique Geologic evidence indicates that the Martian surface has been substantially modified by the action of liquid water, and that much of that water still resides beneath the surface as ground ice. The pore volume of the Martian regolith is substantial, and a large amount of this volume can be expected to be at tem- peratures cold enough for ice to be present. Calculations of the thermodynamic stability of ground ice on Mars suggest that it can exist very close to the surface at high latitudes, but can persist only at substantial depths near the equator. Impact craters with distinctive lobale ejecta deposits are common on Mars. These rampart craters apparently owe their morphology to fluidhation of sub- surface materials, perhaps by the melting of ground ice, during impact events. If this interpretation is correct, then the size frequency distribution of rampart 523 524 S. W. SQUYRES ET AL. craters is broadly consistent with the depth distribution of ice inferred from stability calculations. A variety of observed Martian landforms can be attrib- uted to creep of the Martian regolith abetted by deformation of ground ice. Global mapping of creep features also supports the idea that ice is present in near-surface materials at latitudes higher than ± 30°, and suggests that ice is largely absent from such materials at lower latitudes. Other morphologic fea- tures on Mars that may result from the present or former existence of ground ice include chaotic terrain, thermokarst and patterned ground. -
Early Devonian Suprasubduction Ophiolites of the Southern Urals A
ISSN 00168521, Geotectonics, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 321–343. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © A.A. Belova, A.V. Ryazantsev, A.A. Razumovsky, K.E. Degtyarev, 2010, published in Geotektonika, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 39–64. Early Devonian Suprasubduction Ophiolites of the Southern Urals A. A. Belovaa, b, A. V. Ryazantseva, A. A. Razumovskya, and K. E. Degtyareva a Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 7, Moscow, 119017 Russia b Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia email: [email protected] Received January 25, 2010 Abstract—The composition of ophiolites widespread in the southern Urals shows that they were formed in a suprasubduction setting. LowTi and highMg sheeted dikes and volcanic rocks vary from basalt to andesite, and many varieties belong to boninite series. The rocks of this type extend as a 600km tract. The volcanic rocks contain chert interbeds with Emsian conodonts. Plagiogranites localized at the level of the sheeted dike complex and related to this complex genetically are dated at 400 Ma. The ophiolites make up a base of thick island arc volcanic sequence. The composition of the igneous rocks and the parameters of their metamorphism indicate that subduction and ascent of a mantle plume participated in their formation. The nonstationary subduction at the intraoceanic convergent plate boundary developed, at least, from the Middle Ordovician. DOI: 10.1134/S0016852110040035 INTRODUCTION differ from the Devonian counterpart in geochemistry. Subductionrelated ophiolites are widesperad in In some places, ophiolites differing in age and compo the Paleozoides of the southern Urals. Sheeted dikes sition converge and intercalate. -
Global Spectral Classification of Martian Low-Albedo Regions with Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer (MGS-TES) Data A
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, E02004, doi:10.1029/2006JE002726, 2007 Global spectral classification of Martian low-albedo regions with Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer (MGS-TES) data A. Deanne Rogers,1 Joshua L. Bandfield,2 and Philip R. Christensen2 Received 4 April 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 13 September 2006; published 14 February 2007. [1] Martian low-albedo surfaces (defined here as surfaces with Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer (MGS-TES) albedo values 0.15) were reexamined for regional variations in spectral response. Low-albedo regions exhibit spatially coherent variations in spectral character, which in this work are grouped into 11 representative spectral shapes. The use of these spectral shapes in modeling global surface emissivity results in refined distributions of previously determined global spectral unit types (Surface Types 1 and 2). Pure Type 2 surfaces are less extensive than previously thought, and are mostly confined to the northern lowlands. Regional-scale spectral variations are present within areas previously mapped as Surface Type 1 or as a mixture of the two surface types, suggesting variations in mineral abundance among basaltic units. For example, Syrtis Major, which was the Surface Type 1 type locality, is spectrally distinct from terrains that were also previously mapped as Type 1. A spectral difference also exists between southern and northern Acidalia Planitia, which may be due in part to a small amount of dust cover in southern Acidalia. Groups of these spectral shapes can be averaged to produce spectra that are similar to Surface Types 1 and 2, indicating that the originally derived surface types are representative of the average of all low-albedo regions. -
The Very Forward CASTOR Calorimeter of the CMS Experiment
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-EP-2020-180 2021/02/11 CMS-PRF-18-002 The very forward CASTOR calorimeter of the CMS experiment The CMS Collaboration* Abstract The physics motivation, detector design, triggers, calibration, alignment, simulation, and overall performance of the very forward CASTOR calorimeter of the CMS exper- iment are reviewed. The CASTOR Cherenkov sampling calorimeter is located very close to the LHC beam line, at a radial distance of about 1 cm from the beam pipe, and at 14.4 m from the CMS interaction point, covering the pseudorapidity range of −6.6 < h < −5.2. It was designed to withstand high ambient radiation and strong magnetic fields. The performance of the detector in measurements of forward energy density, jets, and processes characterized by rapidity gaps, is reviewed using data collected in proton and nuclear collisions at the LHC. ”Published in the Journal of Instrumentation as doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/02/P02010.” arXiv:2011.01185v2 [physics.ins-det] 10 Feb 2021 © 2021 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration. CC-BY-4.0 license *See Appendix A for the list of collaboration members Contents 1 Contents 1 Introduction . .1 2 Physics motivation . .3 2.1 Forward physics in proton-proton collisions . .3 2.2 Ultrahigh-energy cosmic ray air showers . .5 2.3 Proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions . .5 3 Detector design . .6 4 Triggers and operation . .9 5 Event reconstruction and calibration . 12 5.1 Noise and baseline . 13 5.2 Gain correction factors . 15 5.3 Channel-by-channel intercalibration . -
Geologic Studies in Support of Manned Martian Exploration
Geologic Studies in Support of Manned Martian Exploration Perry Frix, Katherine McCloskey, and Lynn D. V. Neakrase Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe Ronald Greeley Faculty Advisor, Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe Abstract With the advent of the space exploration of the middle part of this century, Mars has become a tangible target for manned space flight missions in the upcoming decades. The goals of Mars exploration focus mainly on the presence of water and the geologic features associated with it. To explore the feasibility of a manned mission, a field analog project was conducted. The project began by examining a series of aerial photographs representing “descent” space craft images. From the photographs, local and regional geology of the two “landing” sites was determined and several “targets of interest” were chosen. The targets were prioritized based on relevance to achieving the goals of the project and Mars exploration. Traverses to each target, as well as measurements and sample collections were planned, and a timeline for the exercise was created. From this it was found that for any mission to be successful, a balance must be discovered between keeping to the planned timeline schedule, and impromptu revision of the mission to allow for conflicts, problems and other adjustments necessary due to greater information gathered upon arrival at the landing site. At the conclusion of the field exercise, it was determined that a valuable resource for mission planning is high resolution remote sensing of the landing area. This led us to conduct a study to determine what ranges of resolution are necessary to observe geology features important to achieving the goals of Mars exploration. -
Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers, Flagstaff, AZ 2014
Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers, Flagstaff, AZ 2014 Edited by: James A. Skinner, Jr. U. S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ David Williams Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ NOTE: Abstracts in this volume can be cited using the following format: Graupner, M. and Hansen, V.L., 2014, Structural and Geologic Mapping of Tellus Region, Venus, in Skinner, J. A., Jr. and Williams, D. A., eds., Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers, Flagstaff, AZ, June 23-25, 2014. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Monday, June 23– Planetary Geologic Mappers Meeting Time Planet/Body Topic 8:30 am Arrive/Set-up – 2255 N. Gemini Drive (USGS) 9:00 Welcome/Logistics 9:10 NASA HQ and Program Remarks (M. Kelley) 9:30 USGS Map Coordinator Remarks (J. Skinner) 9:45 GIS and Web Updates (C. Fortezzo) 10:00 RPIF Updates (J. Hagerty) 10:15 BREAK / POSTERS 10:40 Venus Irnini Mons (D. Buczkowski) 11:00 Moon Lunar South Pole (S. Mest) 11:20 Moon Copernicus Quad (J. Hagerty) 11:40 Vesta Iterative Geologic Mapping (A. Yingst) 12:00 pm LUNCH / POSTERS 1:30 Vesta Proposed Time-Stratigraphy (D. Williams) 1:50 Mars Global Geology (J. Skinner) 2:10 Mars Terra Sirenum (R. Anderson) 2:30 Mars Arsia/Pavonis Montes (B. Garry) 2:50 Mars Valles Marineris (C. Fortezzo) 3:10 BREAK / POSTERS 3:30 Mars Candor Chasma (C. Okubo) 3:50 Mars Hrad Vallis (P. Mouginis-Mark) 4:10 Mars S. Margaritifer Terra (J. Grant) 4:30 Mars Ladon basin (C. Weitz) 4:50 DISCUSSION / POSTERS ~5:15 ADJOURN Tuesday, June 24 - Planetary Geologic Mappers Meeting Time Planet/Body Topic 8:30 am Arrive/Set-up/Logistics 9:00 Mars Upper Dao and Niger Valles (S. -
19. New Evidence for Interplanetary Boulders?
19. New Evidence for Interplanetary Boulders? ZDENEK SEKANINA Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, Massachusetts The present paper critically discusses the method of detection, the magnitude and the rate of occurrence of sudden disturbances in the motions of some short-period comets. The disturbances have recently been suggested as potential indicators of collisions be tween the comets and interplanetary boulders—minor objects whose existence was pre dicted by M. Harwit in 1967. The character of explosive phenomena, caused by an impact of such a boulder on a comet's nuclear surface, depends significantly on the surface texture of the target body. To advance our understanding of the impact mecha nism, a method is suggested which would supply a good deal of the missing information about the structure and optical properties of nuclear surfaces from precise photometric observations of cometary nuclei at large solar distances. THE IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that the observed disturbances can be generated by collisions of the boulders with low ECENT EXTENSIVE DYNAMICAL STUDIES of a density comet nuclei, if the comet-to-boulder R number of short-period comets by Marsden mass ratio is about 106. As a result of such an (1969, 1970), by Yeomans (1972), and by impact the comet would lose as much as 10 Marsden and Sekanina (1971) resulted in a percent of its mass. Repeated impacts can easily discovery of easily detectable disturbances in the result in a splitting of the nucleus, or its complete motions of the comets we call 'erratic': P/Biela, disintegration in a relatively short period of time. P/Brorsen, P/Giacobini-Zinner, P/Perrine-Mrkos, With Harwit's space mass density of boulders the P/Schaumasse, possibly also P/Forbes and proposed hypothesis predicts an average rate of P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdu§akova. -
Features Named After 07/15/2015) and the 2018 IAU GA (Features Named Before 01/24/2018)
The following is a list of names of features that were approved between the 2015 Report to the IAU GA (features named after 07/15/2015) and the 2018 IAU GA (features named before 01/24/2018). Mercury (31) Craters (20) Akutagawa Ryunosuke; Japanese writer (1892-1927). Anguissola SofonisBa; Italian painter (1532-1625) Anyte Anyte of Tegea, Greek poet (early 3rd centrury BC). Bagryana Elisaveta; Bulgarian poet (1893-1991). Baranauskas Antanas; Lithuanian poet (1835-1902). Boznańska Olga; Polish painter (1865-1940). Brooks Gwendolyn; American poet and novelist (1917-2000). Burke Mary William EthelBert Appleton “Billieâ€; American performing artist (1884- 1970). Castiglione Giuseppe; Italian painter in the court of the Emperor of China (1688-1766). Driscoll Clara; American stained glass artist (1861-1944). Du Fu Tu Fu; Chinese poet (712-770). Heaney Seamus Justin; Irish poet and playwright (1939 - 2013). JoBim Antonio Carlos; Brazilian composer and musician (1927-1994). Kerouac Jack, American poet and author (1922-1969). Namatjira Albert; Australian Aboriginal artist, pioneer of contemporary Indigenous Australian art (1902-1959). Plath Sylvia; American poet (1932-1963). Sapkota Mahananda; Nepalese poet (1896-1977). Villa-LoBos Heitor; Brazilian composer (1887-1959). Vonnegut Kurt; American writer (1922-2007). Yamada Kosaku; Japanese composer and conductor (1886-1965). Planitiae (9) Apārangi Planitia Māori word for the planet Mercury. Lugus Planitia Gaulish equivalent of the Roman god Mercury. Mearcair Planitia Irish word for the planet Mercury. Otaared Planitia Arabic word for the planet Mercury. Papsukkal Planitia Akkadian messenger god. Sihtu Planitia Babylonian word for the planet Mercury. StilBon Planitia Ancient Greek word for the planet Mercury. -
Planets Solar System Paper Contents
Planets Solar system paper Contents 1 Jupiter 1 1.1 Structure ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Composition ......................................... 1 1.1.2 Mass and size ......................................... 2 1.1.3 Internal structure ....................................... 2 1.2 Atmosphere .............................................. 3 1.2.1 Cloud layers ......................................... 3 1.2.2 Great Red Spot and other vortices .............................. 4 1.3 Planetary rings ............................................ 4 1.4 Magnetosphere ............................................ 5 1.5 Orbit and rotation ........................................... 5 1.6 Observation .............................................. 6 1.7 Research and exploration ....................................... 6 1.7.1 Pre-telescopic research .................................... 6 1.7.2 Ground-based telescope research ............................... 7 1.7.3 Radiotelescope research ................................... 8 1.7.4 Exploration with space probes ................................ 8 1.8 Moons ................................................. 9 1.8.1 Galilean moons ........................................ 10 1.8.2 Classification of moons .................................... 10 1.9 Interaction with the Solar System ................................... 10 1.9.1 Impacts ............................................ 11 1.10 Possibility of life ........................................... 12 1.11 Mythology .............................................