(Lepidoptera, Lypusidae) from Korea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) from China Paralypusa – Новый Род Семейства Lypusidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) Из Китая
ZOOSYSTEMATICA ROSSICA, 21(1): 169–172 25 JULY 2012 Paralypusa, a new genus of the family Lypusidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) from China Paralypusa – новый род семейства Lypusidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) из Китая A.L. LVOVSKY А.Л. ЛЬВОВСКИЙ A.L. Lvovsky, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] A new eastern-palaearctic monotypic genus of the gelechioid moths, Paralypusa gen. nov., is established for the Chinese species Paralypusa chinensis (Lvovsky, 2010), comb. nov. This genus is considered closely related to Lypusa Zeller, 1852 on the base of several synapomor- phies. However Paralypusa also shares some features with the genera Pseudatemelia Rebel, 1910 and Amphisbatis Zeller, 1870. Its transitional state confirms the belonging of all the afore- mentioned genera to one family and synonymy of the Lypusidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1857 and Amphisbatidae Spuler, 1910 (Nieukerken et al., 2011). Описан новый восточнопалеарктический монотипический род гелехиоидных чешуекры- лых Paralypusa gen. nov., включающий китайский вид Paralypusa chinensis (Lvovsky, 2010), comb. nov. Этот род сближается с родом Lypusa Zeller, 1852 на основании ряда синапоморфий. Тем не менее, Paralypusa также имеет признаки, общие с Pseudatemelia Rebel, 1910 и Amphisbatis Zeller, 1870. Его промежуточное положение подтверждает принадлежность всех вышеупомянутых родов к одному семейству и синонимию Lypusi- dae Herrich-Schäffer, 1857 and Amphisbatidae Spuler, 1910 (Nieukerken et al., 2011). -
Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe. -
A New Species of the Genus Irepacma MORIUTI, SAITO & LEWVANICH
©Entomologisches Museum Dr. Ulf Eitschberger, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta 46: 117-118, Marktleuthen (2015), ISSN 0171-0079 A new species of the genus Irepacma MORIUTI, SAITO & LEWVANICH, 1985 from Thailand (Lepidoptera, Lypusidae) by ALEXANDR L. LVOVSKY received 17.IV.2015 Abstract: A new species of the moth genus Irepacma MORIUTI, SAITO & LEWVANICH, 1985 is described from Thailand. The moths were collected by Mr C. F. VAN BEUSEKOM on Luang plateau. The holotype and 2 paratypes of the new species are deposited in Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, the Netherlands. One paratype is deposited in the Zoological institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg. Hitherto the genus Irepacma was represented by 22 species (MORIUTI, SAITO & LEWVANICH, 1985, 1989; WANG, 2006; WANG & WANG, 2011; YIN & WANG, 2014) distributed in China, Myanmar and Thailand. This genus is very similar to genus Periacma MEYRICK, 1894, but differs from the latter by having a dorso-proximal process of the valva that exceeds half the length of the valva or this process is absent in the male genitalia and by the absence of the apophyses anteriores in the female genitalia. Some species of this genus are very similar in general appearance and differ only by details of genitalia structures. Irepacma l u a n g i spec. nov. Holotype †: Thailand, 1100 m, prov. Chiangmai, Luang plateau, at light, 11.VI.1968, C. F. BEUSEKOM leg. Gen. prep. No 73, A. LVOVSKY. Paratypes 3 ††, with the same labels, gen. prep. No 17625. Description: Forewing length 6,5-7 mm, wingspan 14-15 mm. -
International Network of Gelechioid Aficionados
Issue 3 19 December 2013 ISSN 2328-370X I.N. G.A. Newsletter of the International Network of Gelechioid Aficionados Aeolanthes sp. near erebomicta, Hong Kong. Photo by R.C. Kendrick http://www.flickr.com/photos/hkmoths/sets/72157616900373998/ ear Readers, D The editorial members are thankful to you for your readership and support of the I.N.G.A. newsletter. Within the first year of I.N.G.A., many contributions have been made, and also more subscriptions were requested. The newsletter would not be possible without your support, and we hope this continues. All are invited to submit on any article relevant to our newsletter‘s mission. All submitted manuscripts will be reviewed and any suggested changes will be with permission of the authors. The I.N.G.A. newsletter is a biannually distributed electronic newsletter (published on June and December). Please feel free to check the guidelines for submission on the website: http://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/Lepidoptera/ Gelechioidea/INGA/Submissions_Guidelines.pdf In the meantime, please enjoy the issue, and if you get a chance, send us your feedback and keep us informed about any changes or additions you would like to see with the newsletter. Wish all of you have a warm and wonderful holiday season! The editors of I.N.G.A. newsletter I.N.G.A. 3 - 2013 1 Gelechioid Aficionados intend to expand on my published dissertation and David Adamski: initiate a cladistic analysis of the world Blastobasidae, collecting data from about 550 species. From this study Moonlighting with Gelechioidea I expect to present phylogenetic-classification for the family at a global level with emphasis on the evolution of host preferences within a biogeographical context. -
The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition
The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 1 The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition By D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 Published by Staffordshire Ecological Record, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford Copyright © D.W. Emley, 2014 ISBN (online version): 978-1-910434-00-0 Available from : http://www.staffs-ecology.org.uk Front cover : Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla, Dave Emley Introduction to the up-dated and revised edition ............................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... 2 MICROPTERIGIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 ERIOCRANIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 NEPTICULIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 4 OPOSTEGIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 6 HELIOZELIDAE ............................................................................................................................................. -
Lepidoptera:Gelechioidea)
Zootaxa 3616 (2): 165–172 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3616.2.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB88D592-8430-473C-BC40-7D43AC5149AA Identity of Eumenodora encrypta Meyrick, a cryptic Australian moth (Lepidoptera:Gelechioidea) LAURI KAILA Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, P.O.Box 17, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A hitherto neglected gelechioid moth genus Eumenodora Meyrick (Gelechioidea: Elachistidae; Cosmopterigidae; Xyloryctidae) is redescribed. The genus, originally assigned to the Elachistidae and later transferred to the Cosmopterigidae, is monotypic. The single constituent species, E. encrypta Meyrick, 1906, has long been known only from the holotype, collected in Brisbane, Queensland (Australia). The specimen lacks its abdomen. The genus is characterized and the single recognized species redescribed based on recently collected adult males and a female. Evidence from morphology, supported by DNA sequences, is provided to support the placement of the taxon in the Hierodoris group of the Xyloryctidae, in spite of its atypical external appearance. Key words: systematics, Gelechioidea, Cosmopterigidae, Elachistidae, Xyloryctidae, Hierodoris group, re-description Introduction Australia is notorious for harbouring a vast diversity of moths belonging to the superfamily Gelechioidea where it is by far the largest lepidopteran superfamily (Nielsen et al. 1996). While the Oecophoridae is the largest of gelechioid families in Australia, families such as the Gelechiidae, Xyloryctidae, Cosmopterigidae, Elachistidae and Stathmopodidae are also particularly diverse there (Common 1990, Nielsen et al. -
Identification of Micro-Moth Families
Identification of micro-moth families Introduction This guide is intended for use by Garden Moth Scheme (GMS) recorders and other British and Irish moth enthusiasts. It is aimed at those who already have some understanding of moth taxonomy and morphology but struggle to easily home-in on which moth family a micro- moth belongs to. For further information about how to start out moth- trapping see www.gardenmoths.org.uk. There are currently over 1600 British and Irish micro-moth species, compared to around 800 species of macro-moth and 60 species of butterfly, so species identification is particularly challenging. Narrowing down identification to species requires additional information from training courses, websites and field guides. This guide shows photographs of 45 micro-moth families at rest, together with identification tips, similar species, and the number of species in that family. Taxonomists disagree on the order and arrangement of families, but this guide follows the numbering system of Bradley and Fletcher (B&F) wherever possible. The guide is intended to be used with the excellent Field Guide to the Micromoths of Great Britain and Ireland by Sterling, Parsons and Lewington, British Wildlife Publishing (2012, SPL), which covers 1000+ micro-moth species. However, for the uninitiated, facing a light trap full of micro-moths starting from scratch with SPL can be both daunting and time-consuming. Family names are different and are shown in a different order in SPL and B&F, so in order to reduce confusion, after the B&F numbers are quoted for each family the page numbers for the plates in SPL are also given. -
Introduction to Micro-Moth Identification David Slade Lepidoptera County Recorder (VC41) What Is the Difference… Macro Vs Micro a Large Micro – Wingspan C35mm
Introduction to Micro-moth Identification David Slade Lepidoptera County Recorder (VC41) What is the Difference… Macro vs Micro A large micro – wingspan c35mm Mother of Pearl (D. Slade) A small macro – wingspan c15mm Marsh Oblique-barred (D. Slade) Explaining the division Swifts Goat Moth/ Leopards/ Pyralids Burnets/Clearwings etc Micros Butterflies Macros From December 2013 What is the Difference… Macro vs Micro A pseudo-taxonomic split! Phil Stirling’s Definition: Families that are mostly large species = Macro Families that are mostly small species = Micro Some Numbers 2700 Species of Lepidoptera in UK 100 Butterflies 1600 2600 Moths 1400 1000 ‘Macros’ 1200 1600 ‘Micros’ 1000 Micros In Glamorgan: 800 Butterflies 1700 species 600 Macros 950 Micros 400 50 Butterflies 200 700 Macros 0 All Lepidoptera Glamorgan Numbers are approximate!! M icropte rigidae Eriocranii dae Hepialid ae Nepticuli dae Opostegi dae Heliozelid ae Adelidae Incurvarii dae Prodoxid ae Tischeriid ae Psychida e Tineidae Roeslerst ammiida e Bucculat ricidae The Lepidoptera Families Gracillarii dae Yponom eutidae Ypsoloph idae Plutellida e Glyphipt erigidae Argyrest hiidae Lyonetiid ae Praydida e Heliodini dae Bedelliid ae 1. Micropterigidae 19. Glyphipterigidae 37. Coleophoridae 55. Papilionidae Scythropi idae Douglasii dae Autostich idae Oecoph oridae 2. Eriocraniidae 20. Argyresthiidae 38. Elachistidae 56. Hesperiidae Chimab achidae Lypusida e Peleopo didae Depressa riidae 3. Hepialidae 21. Lyonetiidae 39. Parametriotidae 57. Pieridae Ethmiida e Cosmopt erigidae Gelechii dae Batrache dridae 4. Nepticulidae 22. Praydidae 40. Momphidae 58. Nymphalidae Coleoph oridae Elachistid ae Parametr iotidae M omphi 5. Opostegidae 23. Heliodinidae 41. Blastobasidae 59. Riodinidae dae Blastoba sidae Stathmo podidae Scythridi dae Alucitida 6. -
NORFOLK BRANCH of Butterfly Conservation
NORFOLK BRANCH of Butterfy Conservation NEWSLETTER 91 SPRING 2016 Butterfy Conservation Company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468) Registered Offce: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP Charity registered in England & Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268) NORFOLK BRANCH - OFFICERS AND COMMITTEE Chairman Judy Dunmore, Hon. Treasurer Roland Rogers MBE Membership Secretary Karen Husband Conservation Offcer Dr. Bernard Watts, County Recorder Andy Brazil Transect Co-ordinator Alan Dawson Catfeld Fen Reserve - Liaison Mandy Gluth Field Trip Organisers Ann and Bob Carpenter Events Organiser Vacant Publicity Kiri Stuart-Clarke Newsletter Editor Mike Gasson Minutes Secretary Derek Longe Moth Offcer Greg Bond Webmaster Neil Saunders Twitter Co-ordinator Dave Brice WCBS Co-ordinator Julian Bull Catfeld Fen Reserve - Warden Dr. Keith Bacon [Contact details are available in hard copy versions of the Newsletter] Norfolk Branch web-sites www.norfolk-butterfies.org.uk http://butterfy-conservation.org/291/norfolk-branch.html National web-site www.butterfy-conservation.org Facebook: Butterfy Conservation Norfolk Twitter: @BC_Norfolk The opinions expressed in this newsletter are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Society Part of the cost of printing this newsletter has very kindly been donated in memory of Mr John Edgar Mallett, originally of Stiffkey, Norfolk Front Cover Photograph: Swallowtail by Kiri Stuart-Clarke (see page 20 for Kiri’s article on butterfy photography tips). Inside Front Cover: More Swallowtail photographs from Kiri Stuart-Clarke. 3 Chairman’s Thoughts By Judy Dunmore Firstly, a very warm welcome to all those new members who have joined us over the winter months. -
Taxonomic Study of the Genus Meleonoma Meyrick from Thailand
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 571: 133–141Taxonomic (2016) study of the genus Meleonoma Meyrick from Thailand... 133 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.571.6897 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Taxonomic study of the genus Meleonoma Meyrick from Thailand (Lepidoptera, Gelechioidea) Aihui Yin1, Shuxia Wang1 1 College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China Corresponding author: Shuxia Wang ([email protected]) Academic editor: E. van Nieukerken | Received 19 October 2015 | Accepted 21 January 2016 | Published 7 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/95D9546B-4715-4617-AC75-FDB8EE524C3C Citation: Yin A, Wang S (2016) Taxonomic study of the genus Meleonoma Meyrick from Thailand (Lepidoptera, Gelechioidea). ZooKeys 571: 133–141. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.571.6897 Abstract Five species of the genus Meleonoma Meyrick are reported from Thailand. Meleonoma triangula Wang, sp. n., M. dorsolobulata Wang, sp. n., M. elongata Wang, sp. n., and M. bilobata Wang, sp. n. are described as new; M. facialis Li & Wang, 2002 is redescribed and recorded for the first time from Thailand. Keywords Lepidoptera, Oecophoridae, Meleonoma, new species, Thailand Introduction Meyrick (1914) established the genus Meleonoma in the family Oecophoridae, with Cryptolechia stomota Meyrick, 1910 as the type species. Gaede (1939) listed eleven Me- leonoma species: three from Australia, two from India and two Sri Lanka, and one each from Madagascar, China, Sikkim and Borneo. Common (1996) synonymized M. basanista Meyrick, 1922 with Oresitropha pentochra (Lower, 1894), and placed M. psammota Meyrick, 1915 in the subfamily Oecophorinae; Edwards and Nielsen (1996) placed M. capnodyta (Meyrick, 1906), earlier transferred from Borkhausenia, Copyright Aihui Yin, Shuxia Wang. -
{TEXTBOOK} the Behaviour of Moths Ebook Free Download
THE BEHAVIOUR OF MOTHS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Poppy Adams | 320 pages | 02 Jul 2009 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781844084883 | English | London, United Kingdom Why moths matter The fall leaves Vivi unable to have children; another catalyst for the events which unfold. And so it ambles on, with secrets gradually becoming exposed, and the relationship between the sisters coming to light. But I was unconvinced. And not just because it was set near Crewkerne, close by where I live in Somerset — which Adams claims is in Dorset, and has a bowling alley. No, the reason I was unconvinced is because The Behaviour of Moths tries to do the unreliable narrator thing, but it all comes in a huge rush with a big twist towards the end. All the details about moths are doubtless engaging, but they seem to have taken the place of a coherent narrative arc. I found the whole thing… how shall I put it… quite bland. The style is almost ubiquitous across novels of this type — and though there were Gothicky elements especially in the depiction of the house which impressed and set the novel a bit apart, for the most part The Behaviour of Moths was a common-or-garden specimen. Not a bad novel by any means, and passes the time adequately, but could have been so much better. And link to my thoughts on them, naturally…. This is my book group's choice for next month! I was excited about it but now I shall manage my expectations accordingly after your review. I had feared the gothic pastiche would wear thin. -
Lepidoptera of Canada 463 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 463–505 (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada 463 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Lepidoptera of Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Jean-François Landry2, B. Chris Schmidt2, Jeremy R. deWaard3 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320 – 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada 2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 3 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Corresponding author: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 6 June 2018 | Accepted 20 August 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/D18E9BBE-EB97-4528-B312-70C3AA9C3FD8 Citation: Pohl GR, Landry J-F, Schmidt BC, deWaard JR (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 463–505. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 Abstract The known Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) of the provinces and territories of Canada are summarised, and current knowledge is compared to the state of knowledge in 1979. A total of 5405 species are known to occur in Canada in 81 families, and a further 50 species have been reported but are unconfirmed. This represents an increase of 1348 species since 1979. The DNA barcodes available for Canadian Lepidoptera are also tabulated, based on a dataset of 148,314 specimens corresponding to 5842 distinct clusters.