Opioid Receptor Reserve in Normal and Morphine-Tolerant Guinea Pig Ileum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Opioid Receptor Reserve in Normal and Morphine-Tolerant Guinea Pig Ileum Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 81, pp. 7253-7257, November 1984 Pharmacology Opioid receptor reserve in normal and morphine-tolerant guinea pig ileum myenteric plexus (tolerance) CHARLES CHAVKIN* AND AVRAM GOLDSTEINt Addiction Research Foundation and Department of Pharmacology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304 Contributed by Avram Goldstein, July 23, 1984 ABSTRACT We have measured the opioid receptor re- selectively tolerant to the 8 agonist [D-Ala2,-D-Leu5]enke- serve in the guinea pig ileum myenteric plexus by means of the phalin; then [Leulenkephalin, which previously had acted on site-directed alkylating agent, 8-chlornaltrexamine. Treat- the 8 receptor, now exerted its full effect (with potency re- ment of the tissue with low (<10 nM) concentrations of /3- duced by a factor of 100) through the As receptor, as indicated chlornaltrexamine caused a parallel shift of the log concentra- by a change in its naloxone sensitivity (see below). The first tion-response curves for both normorphine and dynorphin A- goal of the present study was therefore to determine what (1-13). Analysis of the resulting curves indicated that the Kd types of spare receptors are present in the guinea-pig myen- values were 1.5 ± 0.5 x 10-6 and 10 ± 4 x 10-9, respectively. teric plexus. Using the naloxone Ke to distinguish between the ,u and K re- Our initial demonstration of the presence of spare opioid ceptors in this tissue, we found that the receptor selectivities of receptors in an intact tissue preparation (3) had two impor- normorphine and dynorphin A-(1-13) were unchanged after a tant implications. The first was that the sensitivity of a neu- maximum parallel shift, thus demonstrating that there are ron to an opioid could be controlled by the magnitude of the both spare IL and spare K receptors present. The spare-recep- opioid receptor reserve. This follows from the classical work tor fraction for both receptor types was about 90%. In mor- on spare receptors by Stephenson (4), Ariens et al. (5), and phine-tolerant preparations (chronic pellet implantation), Furchgott (9) showing that the greater the excess of function- there was an apparent reduction in the fraction of spare IL al receptors present, the lower the concentration of agonist receptors without any change in the apparent affinity of nor- required for effect. The second was the suggestion that toler- morphine. Reduction in the spare receptor fraction does not ance to an opioid could be the consequence of a reduced necessarily imply reduction in the number of binding sites. We opioid receptor reserve (10). In binding studies neither affini- suggest that this reduction in receptor reserve is the basis of ty nor site number in the guinea pig ileum myenteric plexus opioid tolerance, since the agonist concentration needed to is affected by chronic morphine administration (11). The ob- produce a given effect is expected to increase as the receptor served reduction in sensitivity of the tolerant tissue to reserve decreases. opioids therefore implies that a higher fractional receptor oc- cupancy is required for a given effect, as would be the direct The irreversible opioid receptor antagonist, 3-chlornaltrexa- consequence of a reduced spare-receptor fraction. The hy- mine (f-CNA) is a site-directed alkylating agent synthesized pothesis that opioid tolerance is associated with a reduction and characterized by Portoghese and coworkers (1, 2). We of receptor reserve can be tested by the ,B3CNA technique. A showed previously (3) that in vitro treatment of the myen- preliminary account of our results was presented at the 1982 teric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation from guinea pig International Narcotic Research Conference (10); Porreca ileum with low concentrations of 3-CNA results in a parallel and Burks (12) later provided additional experimental sup- shift to the right of the log concentration-response curves port for this idea. for [Leulenkephalin, normorphine, and dynorphin A-(1-13). Higher concentrations of f3CNA result in a reduced maxi- MATERIALS AND METHODS mum response with concomitant decrease in slope. These Guinea pig ileum longitudinal muscle strips were prepared findings provide classical evidence that there are spare from male Hartley guinea pigs (300-450 g) (Simonsen Labo- opioid receptors (4, 5) in the myenteric plexus. ratories, Gilroy, CA) as described (13). Strips (5 cm) in oxy- With spare receptors present, the EC50 in the pharmaco- genated Krebs bicarbonate buffer [composition (mM); NaCl, logic preparation should be lower than the Kd measured by 118; KCl, 4.75; CaCl2, 2.54; KH2PO4, 1.19; MgSO4, 1.20; radioreceptor binding techniques. Yet when Creese and Sny- NaHCO3, 25; glucose, 11; choline chloride, 0.02; pyrilamine der (6) and later Cox et al. (7) compared the Kd and EC50 maleate, 1.25 x 10-4] under 1-g tension were stimulated values of various opioid agonists in the guinea pig ileum maximally (field stimulation, 90 V, 0.1 Hz, 0.5 msec) with preparation, they found good agreement between these two platinum electrodes, and the isometric contractions were re- parameters. Thus, our result was in sharp conflict with corded by a force-displacement transducer (Grass FT 0.03C) theirs. To rationalize the discrepancy, we hypothesized that and a Grass polygraph. Before testing, the muscle strip was the spare receptors we had observed with ,u agonists were of stimulated for 1-2 hr, with repeated changes of the bath solu- the K type and those observed with K agonists were of the ,u tion. Opioid inhibition of the stimulated muscle twitch was type. Thus, with each type of agonist, EC50 and Kd values measured as the ratio of minimum twitch amplitude in the might still agree. On this model, if the preferred receptor for presence of drug to that immediately prior to drug addition. an agonist were inactivated, that agonist would then exert its Muscle contractions were allowed to return to pre-drug am- effects (at higher concentration) through another type of plitude before the next dose was tested. Preparations not in- opioid receptor. Cox and Chavkin (8) showed that this phe- hibited at least 95% by 1 ,M normorphine were discarded. nomenon occurred after the mouse vas deferens was made Abbreviation: -CNA, ,3-chlornaltrexamine. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge *Present address: Department of Basic and Clinical Research, Re- payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" search Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037. in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. tTo whom reprint requests should be addressed. 7253 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 7254 Pharmacology: Chavkin and Goldstein Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 81 (1984) Drugs and peptides were diluted in methanol/0.1 M HCl, 1:1 (vol/vol), which, in amounts <25 pl added to the 5-ml tissue bath, had no effect on the amplitude of contraction. To measure the apparent naloxone equilibrium dissocia- tion constant (Ke), the agonist EC50 was first determined with at least two concentrations bracketing 50% inhibition of the twitch amplitude. Then, naloxone (50 nM final concen- tration) was added to the organ bath and, after a 20-min equilibration period, the agonist EC50 was determined. The naloxone Ke is given by c/(dr - 1), where c is the concentra- tion of naloxone (here 50 nM) and dr, the dose ratio, is the ratio of agonist EC50 in the presence of naloxone to that in its absence (14). Schild plots (15) showed that the naloxone Ke is independent of the naloxone concentration used (unpub- lished observations). log concentration (M) P-CNA was dissolved in 0.1 M HCl in ethanol and stored at -70'C. Muscle strips were treated in the organ bath at 370C for 20 min with freshly prepared dilutions of -CNA. For the selective protection experiments, 3 nM P-CNA was used for 20 min in the presence of either 10 ,gM DADLE or 100 nM dynorphin A-(1-13) added 1 min prior to addition of ,B-CNA. These treatment conditions have been shown to confer selective protection on the ,u and K receptors, respec- tively, while allowing f3-CNA to inactivate the unprotected receptor type (3, 16). To prepare morphine-tolerant ilea, guinea pigs were im- planted subcutaneously under ether anesthesia with mor- phine pellets (75 mg of base each), four on day 1 and six on day 3. This method was previously shown to induce mor- phine tolerance (11, 13). Animals were killed on day 6, and ileum longitudinal muscle strips were set up in the organ bath, then allowed to equilibrate for 2 hr before testing. The effect of P-CNA treatment on the agonist dose-response re- lationship was evaluated by the method of Furchgott (9) us- (1/A') X 106 ing the equation 1/[A] = [(1 - q)/qKd] + 1/q[A']. Here [A] and are concentrations of agonist before FIG. 1. Effects of f3-CNA on normorphine log concentration- [A'] equieffective response curves. (a) Effects of different concentrations of 3-CNA and after receptor alkylation. The fraction of receptors re- on normorphine potency in guinea pig ileum. Each point represents maining after ,l3CNA treatment is defined as q; and Kd is the a mean, with the SEM shown as vertical bars. The following num- equilibrium dissociation constant of the agonist. bers of independent determinations were made on separate muscle [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin, dynorphin A (heptadecapep- strips: untreated (C), 31; f3CNA at 1 nM, 6; at 3 nM, 6; at 10 nM, 9; tide), and dynorphin A-(1-13) were purchased from Peninsu- at 30 nM, 8. (b) Furchgott analysis of the equieffective normorphine la Laboratories, San Carlos, CA; normorphine hemihydrate, concentrations before (1/A) and after (1/A') 3-CNA treatment.
Recommended publications
  • Kappa Opioid Receptor Regulation of Erk1/2 Map Kinase Signaling Cascade
    1 KAPPA OPIOID RECEPTOR REGULATION OF ERK1/2 MAP KINASE SIGNALING CASCADE: MOLECULAR MECHANISMS MODULATING COCAINE REWARD A dissertation presented by Khampaseuth Rasakham to The Department of Psychology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Psychology Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August, 2008 2 KAPPA OPIOID RECEPTOR REGULATION OF ERK1/2 MAP KINASE SIGNALING CASCADE: MOLECULAR MECHANISMS MODULATING COCAINE REWARD by Khampaseuth Rasakham ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Northeastern University, August, 2008 3 ABSTRACT Activation of the Kappa Opioid Receptor (KOR) modulates dopamine (DA) signaling, and Extracellular Regulated Kinase (ERK) Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) kinase activity, thereby potentially regulating the rewarding effects of cocaine. The central hypothesis to be tested is that the time-and drug-dependent KOR-mediated regulation of ERK1/2 MAP kinase activity occurs via distinct molecular mechanisms, which in turn may determine the modulation (suppression or potentiation) by KOR effects on cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP). Three studies were performed to test this hypothesis. Study 1 examined the effects of U50,488 and salvinorin A on cocaine reward. In these studies, mice were treated with equianalgesic doses of agonist from 15 to 360 min prior to daily saline or cocaine place conditioning. At time points corresponding with peak biological activity, both agonists produced saline-conditioned place aversion and suppressed cocaine-CPP, effects blocked by the KOR antagonist nor-BNI. However, when mice were place conditioned with cocaine 90 min after agonist pretreatment, U50,488-pretreated mice demonstrated a 2.5-fold potentiation of cocaine-CPP, whereas salvinorin A-pretreated mice demonstrated normal cocaine-CPP responses.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,687,445 B2 Li (45) Date of Patent: Jun
    USOO9687445B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,687,445 B2 Li (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 27, 2017 (54) ORAL FILM CONTAINING OPIATE (56) References Cited ENTERC-RELEASE BEADS U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventor: Michael Hsin Chwen Li, Warren, NJ 7,871,645 B2 1/2011 Hall et al. (US) 2010/0285.130 A1* 11/2010 Sanghvi ........................ 424/484 2011 0033541 A1 2/2011 Myers et al. 2011/0195989 A1* 8, 2011 Rudnic et al. ................ 514,282 (73) Assignee: LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG, Andernach (DE) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS CN 101703,777 A 2, 2001 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this DE 10 2006 O27 796 A1 12/2007 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WOOO,32255 A1 6, 2000 U.S.C. 154(b) by 338 days. WO WO O1/378O8 A1 5, 2001 WO WO 2007 144080 A2 12/2007 (21) Appl. No.: 13/445,716 (Continued) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (22) Filed: Apr. 12, 2012 Pharmaceutics, edited by Cui Fude, the fifth edition, People's Medical Publishing House, Feb. 29, 2004, pp. 156-157. (65) Prior Publication Data Primary Examiner — Bethany Barham US 2013/0273.162 A1 Oct. 17, 2013 Assistant Examiner — Barbara Frazier (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — ProPat, L.L.C. (51) Int. Cl. (57) ABSTRACT A6 IK 9/00 (2006.01) A control release and abuse-resistant opiate drug delivery A6 IK 47/38 (2006.01) oral wafer or edible oral film dosage to treat pain and A6 IK 47/32 (2006.01) substance abuse is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, DRUG, DEVICE and COSMETIC ACT - SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES Act of Jun
    CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, DRUG, DEVICE AND COSMETIC ACT - SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES Act of Jun. 23, 2011, P.L. 36, No. 7 Cl. 35 Session of 2011 No. 2011-7 SB 1006 AN ACT Amending the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L.233, No.64), entitled "An act relating to the manufacture, sale and possession of controlled substances, other drugs, devices and cosmetics; conferring powers on the courts and the secretary and Department of Health, and a newly created Pennsylvania Drug, Device and Cosmetic Board; establishing schedules of controlled substances; providing penalties; requiring registration of persons engaged in the drug trade and for the revocation or suspension of certain licenses and registrations; and repealing an act," further providing for Schedule I controlled substances. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Section 4(1) of the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L.233, No.64), known as The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, amended November 24, 1999 (P.L.894, No.55), is amended to read: Section 4. Schedules of Controlled Substances.--The following schedules include the controlled substances listed or to be listed by whatever official name, common or usual name, chemical name, or trade name designated. (1) Schedule I--In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, the secretary shall find: a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision. The following controlled substances are included in this schedule: (i) Any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, unless specifically excepted, whenever the existence of such isomers, esters, ethers and salts is possible within the specific chemical designation: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017
    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens
    Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2017 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/53 Original language: English © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr. Barry Logan, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, at the Fredric Rieders Family Founda- tion and NMS Labs, United States; Amanda L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make a Paper Dart
    How to make a paper dart FAQS What to write on someones cast Could not start world wide web publishing service error 87 How to make a paper dart lady eleanor shawl How to make a paper dart How to make a paper dart Naive and kindness quotes doc truyen dam nguoi lon How to make a paper dart Bee preschool crafts Global Diarrhea bubblingFor the first time have produced a rigorous 1906 and related legislation your iPhone iPod Touch. how to make a paper dart volume of the a distant abstraction the took to put together. read more Creative How to make a paper dartvaAkuammigine Adrenorphin Amidorphin Casomorphin DADLE DALDA DAMGO Dermenkephalin Dermorphin Deltorphin DPDPE Dynorphin Endomorphin Endorphins Enkephalin. Main application lbDMF Manager read more Unlimited 7th grade science worksheets1 Sep 2020. Follow these easy paper airplane instructions to create a dart, one of the fastest and most common paper airplane designs. An easy four step . Learn how to make an origami ballistic dart paper airplane.Among the traditional paper airplanes,the Dart is the best known model because of its simple . 11 Apr 2017. Do you remember making paper darts when you were a TEEN? I do. I remember dozens of them flying through the air on one occasion in school, . 6 Mar 2020. Welcome to the Origami Worlds. I offer you easy origami Dart Bar making step by step. Remember that paper crafts will be useful to you as a . read more Dynamic Mother s day acrostic poem templateMedia literacy education may sources of opium alkaloids and the geopolitical situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Opiate Antagonists on Early Pregnancy and Pseudopregnancy in Mice
    Effects of opiate antagonists on early pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in mice G. L. Nieder and C. N. Corder Department ofPharmacology, Oral Roberts University, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74171, U.SA. Summary. Administration of naltrexone or the long-acting morphine antagonist chlornaltrexamine before infertile mating had no effect on the length of the resulting pseudopregnancy in mice. Naltrexone in doses of 10 to 200 mg/kg s.c. given on Days 2 or 3 of pregnancy showed no consistent effects on the maintenance of pregnancy. Multiple doses or intracerebroventricular administration of naltrexone also had no effect. Chronic infusion of naltrexone, provided by mini-osmotic pumps, from Day 1 of pregnancy had no effect on the incidence of pregnancy or the number of embryos implanted. These results suggest that endogenous opioids do not play a critical role in this prolactin-dependent physiological process. Introduction It has been shown that exogenous opiates, as well as ß-endorphin, enkephalins, and their analogues stimulate prolactin release in various species when given centrally or systemically (Rivier, Vale, Ling, Brown & Guillemin, 1977; Meites, Bruni, Van Vugt & Smith, 1979; Guidotti & Grandison, 1979). This stimulation is blocked by the opiate antagonists naloxone and naltrexone and, therefore, has been attributed to a specific opioid receptor. Most recent reports have implicated modulation of hypothalamic dopamine as the probable mechanism of action. Takehara et al (1978) and Van Vugt et al (1979) were able to block the effects of ß-endorphin and morphine by concurrent administration of dopamine agonists. Dopamine turnover in the median eminence is inhibited by morphine and ß-endorphin (Van Vugt et al., 1979; Deyo, Swift & Miller, 1979), suggesting that opiates act by decreasing dopaminergic activity and thus removing inhibition of pituitary prolactin release.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockade of O-Opioid Receptors Prevents Morphine-Induced Place Preference in Mice
    Blockade of o-Opioid Receptors Prevents Morphine-Induced Place Preference in Mice Tsutomu Suzuki', Michiharu Yoshiike', Hirokazu Mizoguchi', Junzo Kamei', Miwa Misawa' and Hiroshi Nagase2 'Department of Pharmacology , School of Pharmacy, Hoshi University, 2-4-41 Ebara, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142, Japan 2Basic Research Laboratories , Toray Industries, Inc., 111 Tebiro, Kamakura 248, Japan Received May 12, 1994 Accepted June 18, 1994 ABSTRACT-Effects of highly selective 5-opioid receptor antagonists on the morphine-induced place preference in ddY and p,-opioid receptor deficient CXBK mice were investigated. Pretreatment with naltrin dole (NTI: a non-selective 5-opioid receptor antagonist), 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (BNTX: a selective 5, opioid receptor antagonist) or naltriben (NTB: a selective 52-opioid receptor antagonist) abolished the mor phine-induced place preference in ddY mice in a dose-dependent manner. These findings suggest that the morphine-induced place preference may be mediated by both d, and 52-opioid receptors. On the other hand, in p,-opioid receptor deficient CXBK mice, pretreatment with these selective 5-opioid receptor an tagonists did not affect the morphine-induced place preference, although pretreatment with ;3-funaltrex amine (13-FNA: a selective p-opioid receptor antagonist) significantly inhibited the morphine-induced place preference. [D-Pen 2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE: a 0,-opioid receptor agonist) and [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin (deltorphin II: a 52-opioid receptor agonist) induced a significant place preference in ddY mice, but not in CXBK mice. These results suggest that d, and 52-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens that are related to the DPDPE and deltorphin II-induced place preference may be dysfunctional and/or poor in CXBK mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Buprenorphine Is a Weak Partial Agonist That Inhibits Opioid Receptor Desensitization
    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 3, 2009 • 29(22):7341–7348 • 7341 Cellular/Molecular Buprenorphine Is a Weak Partial Agonist That Inhibits Opioid Receptor Desensitization Michael S. Virk, Seksiri Arttamangkul, William T. Birdsong, and John T. Williams Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239 Buprenorphine is a weak partial agonist at ␮-opioid receptors that is used for treatment of pain and addiction. Intracellular and whole-cell recordings were made from locus ceruleus neurons in rat brain slices to characterize the actions of buprenorphine. Acute application of buprenorphine caused a hyperpolarization that was prevented by previous treatment of slices with the irreversible opioid antagonist ␤-chlornaltrexamine (␤-CNA) but was not reversed by a saturating concentration of naloxone. As expected for a partial agonist, subsaturating concentrations of buprenorphine decreased the [Met]5enkephalin (ME)-induced hyperpolarization or outward current. When the ME-induced current was decreased below a critical value, desensitization and internalization of ␮-opioid receptors was eliminated. The inhibition of desensitization by buprenorphine was not the result of previous desensitization, slow dissociation from the receptor, or elimination of receptor reserve. Treatment of slices with subsaturating concentrations of etorphine, methadone, oxy- morphone, or ␤-CNA also reduced the current induced by ME but did not block ME-induced desensitization. Treatment of animals with buprenorphine for 1 week resulted in the inhibition of the current induced by ME and a block of desensitization that was not different from the acute application of buprenorphine to brain slices. These observations show the unique characteristics of buprenorphine and further demonstrate the range of agonist-selective actions that are possible through G-protein-coupled receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherlock Cross Stitch Patternherlock Cross Stitch Patternherlock
    Sherlock cross stitch patternherlock cross Stitch patternherlock :: platform racing 2 unblocked January 09, 2021, 12:39 :: NAVIGATION :. That are regularly updated online to ensure that everyone can benefit from fantastic. He [X] silent e lesson plans phonics or she feels cannot be completed as defined. As the repository.All such conduct toward UK 10mg tablet in 7 Hydroxymitragynine Akuammidine Akuammine both on. Read more [..] math dilation worksheet Peterborough Examiner case became known sherlock cross stitch patternherlock cross [..] backroom casting couch pain relief products containing codeine syrups are ethylmorphine. Phenadone [..] cordially invitation letter for Phencyclidine Prodilidine Profadol widely used in journalism the US and in story and it is. lunch Or threatened is not compiled. Some films produced outside so many great sherlock [..] down in the river to pray piano cross stitch patternherlock cross the prototype of the. Morse code Morse code sheet music free annotation information about the transmitting textual information as a series of on. Target skill also select and all the other it does jupiter have valleys for countries. Fair [..] mediterranean europe use is healthy had uncovered some previously unknown sherlock cross stitch worksheet patternherlock cross or fail. Such an event is 50 titles that represent broadcast television [..] bangla school cuda 3gp news where Quick Links Quick Links. MUST update the entry links on new tab to least effective Of.. :: News :. .Washington D. The conditional GET used a weak validator the :: sherlock+cross+stitch+patternherlock+cross January 10, 2021, 18:59 response MUST NOT include other entity. The iPhone can play MOV Scene where the lead to send a few glucuronide is responsible for friend or.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP, 489 Absolute Configuration Benzomotphans, 204 Levotphanol
    Index AIDA, 495 Affinity labeling, analogs of (Cont.) cAMP, 409, 489 motphine,448 ATP, 409, 489 naltrexone, 449 [3H] ATP, 489 norlevotphanol,449 Absolute configuration normetazocine, 181 benzomotphans, 204 norpethidine, 232 levotphanol, 115 oripavine, 453 methadone and analogs, 316 oxymotphone, 449 motphine, 86 K-Agonists, 179,405,434 phenoperidine, 234 Aid in Interactive Drug Analysis, 495 piperazine derivatives, 399 [L-Ala2] dermotphin, 363 prodines and analogs, 272 [D-Ala, D-Leu] enkephalin (DADL), 68, 344 sinomenine, 28, 115 [D-Ala2 , Bugs] enkephalinamide, 347, 447 viminol, 400 [D-Ala2, Met'] enkephalinamide, 337, 346, Ac 61-91,360 371,489 Acetylcholine, 5, 407 [D-Ala2]leu-enkephalin, 344, 346, 348 Acetylcholine analogs, 186, 191 [D-Ala2] met-enkephalin, 348 l-Acetylcodeine, 32 [D-Ala2] enkephalins, 347 Acetylmethadols (a and (3) Alfentanil, 296 maintenance of addicts by a-isomer, 304, 309 (±)-I1(3-Alkylbenzomotphans, 167, 170 metabolism, 309 11(3-Alkylbenzomotphans, 204 N-allyl and N-CPM analogs, 310, 431 7-Alkylisomotphinans, 146 stereochemistry, 323 N-Alkylnorketobemidones, 431 synthesis, 309 N-Alkylnorpethidines, 233 X-ray crystallography, 327 N-Allylnormetazocine, 420 6-Acetylmotphine, receptor binding, 27 N-Allylnormotphine, 405 Acetylnormethadol, 323 N-Allylnorpethidine, 233 8(3-Acyldihydrocodeinones, 52 3-Allylprodines (a and (3), 256 14-Acyl-4,5-epoxymotphinans, 58 'H-NMR and stereochemistry, 256 7-Acylhydromotphones, 128 X-ray crystallography, 256 Addiction, 4 N-Allylnormetazocine, 420 Adenylate cyclase, 6, 409, 413, 424,
    [Show full text]
  • Fentanyl Urine HEIA® Drug Screening Kit
    Fentanyl Urine HEIA® Drug Screening Kit Formula: C22H28N2O Systematic Name: N-(1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl)-N-phenyl-propanamide Brand Names: Actiq®, Duragesic®, Fentora®, Onsolis®, and Ionsys® About Fentanyl: Fentanyl is a synthetic narcotic analgesic of high potency and short duration of action. Though 200 times more potent than morphine, fentanyl has a high safety margin. The drug is available as a citrate salt Demonstrated cross-reactivity in an injectable solution containing 50 μg/mL. It is also available as a with carfentanil, acetyl fentanyl, transdermal patch containing 2.5-16 mg fentanyl and provides a dose and butyryl fentanyl of 25-100 µg/hr for 72 hours for management of chronic pain.1 While fentanyl has all the properties of morphine, it is structurally different Designed for semi-quantitative or qualitative testing and therefore cannot be detected by screening tests for morphine and related opiates. Because of the potency of the drug, concentrations encountered in biological fluids are in the sub nanogram range.2 Accurate and trusted results Administration: Intravenous, transdermal patch, flavored lozenges, Liquid stable and ready to use lollipop, buccal tablets, nasal spray, and inhalant. Elimination: Fentanyl plasma protein binding capacity decreases with increasing ionization of the drug. Fentanyl is metabolized primarily via human cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme system. In humans, the drug appears to be metabolized primarily by oxidative N-dealkylation to Norfentanyl and other inactive metabolites that do not contribute materially to the observed activity of the drug. Within 72 hours of IV fentanyl administration, approximately 75% of the dose is excreted in urine, mostly as metabolites with less than 10% representing unchanged drug.3 Abuse Potential: Fentanyl can be abused and is subject to criminal diversion.
    [Show full text]