Present Law and Issues Related to the Taxation of Financial Instruments and Products

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Present Law and Issues Related to the Taxation of Financial Instruments and Products PRESENT LAW AND ISSUES RELATED TO THE TAXATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND PRODUCTS A REPORT TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION Prepared by the Staff of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION December 2, 2011 JCX-56-11 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 I. CONSIDERATIONS IN HOLDING, ISSUING, AND STRUCTURING FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS....................................................................................................................... 6 A. Economic Considerations ................................................................................................... 7 B. Financial Accounting Considerations ................................................................................. 9 C. Regulatory Considerations ................................................................................................ 12 II. U.S. INCOME TAX PRINCIPLES ........................................................................................ 14 A. Timing of Income Rules ................................................................................................... 16 B. Character of Income Rules................................................................................................ 19 C. Source of Income Rules .................................................................................................... 22 III. INCOME TAX AND ACCOUNTING RULES AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS RELATED TO FIVE FUNDAMENTAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ........................... 24 A. Income Tax Rules ............................................................................................................. 24 1. Equity .......................................................................................................................... 24 2. Debt ............................................................................................................................. 30 3. Options ........................................................................................................................ 32 4. Forward contracts ........................................................................................................ 36 5. Notional principal contracts ........................................................................................ 39 B. Relationships among Financial Instruments ..................................................................... 44 C. Financial Accounting Treatment of Financial Instruments .............................................. 48 1. In general .................................................................................................................... 48 2. Consequences of holding and issuing debt and equity ............................................... 49 3. Consequences of entering into a derivative contract .................................................. 52 4. Special rules ................................................................................................................ 53 5. Issues in financial accounting for financial instruments ............................................. 56 6. Major differences between tax and financial accounting for financial instruments ... 58 IV. DISCUSSION OF SELECTED TAX ISSUES ...................................................................... 62 A. Issues Related to the Categorization of an Instrument ...................................................... 62 B. Issues Related to Timing ................................................................................................... 68 1. Deferral of income ...................................................................................................... 68 2. Acceleration of losses ................................................................................................. 70 C. Issues Related to Character ............................................................................................... 72 1. Conversion of short-term gain into long-term gain .................................................... 72 2. Conversion of capital to ordinary and vice versa ........................................................ 73 D. Issues Related to Source ................................................................................................... 75 1. Category of income conversion .................................................................................. 75 i 2. Gaps in source rules .................................................................................................... 77 E. When Issues of Timing, Character, and Source Intersect ................................................. 80 1. Timing and character rules for section 1256 contracts and tax straddles ................... 80 2. Constructive ownership transactions under section 1260 ........................................... 84 3. Exchange traded notes ................................................................................................ 86 APPENDIX: DATA ON TRADING IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS .................................. 91 ii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Introduction This document1 has been prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, in response to the request of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation for a report of Federal tax rules relating to the taxation of financial instruments.2 Starting in 2008, there have been a series of financial shocks, an ensuing worldwide recession, and persistent instability in global financial markets. The volume of financial instruments traded in the United States and abroad increased dramatically in the two decades preceding these developments. Policymakers have sought to understand the role of financial instruments in the economy. At the same time, policymakers have been interested in the tax treatment of financial instruments, in part out of concern about inconsistent treatment of instruments with similar economic characteristics. Financial instruments include basic investments such as stocks and bonds (or, more broadly, equity and debt), assets that combine features of both equity and debt, and contracts referred to as derivatives. Derivatives are instruments the value of which derives from the value of other property, liabilities, or other measures. Common derivatives are options, forward and futures contracts, and swaps. The tax term for a swap is a notional principal contract. Options, forwards and futures, and swaps have the following definitions: An option is a contract between two parties that gives the holder of the option the right but not the obligation to buy from (in the case of a call option) or sell to (in the case of a put option) the issuer of the option a specified amount of property (such as 100 shares of Microsoft stock) at a fixed price and specified time. In a forward contract one party to the contract obligates itself to purchase from the other party a fixed quantity of property (such as 1,000 shares of General Electric stock) at a fixed price on a fixed future date. A futures contract is a standardized forward contract that is traded on an exchange such as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Futures contracts historically have been for the purchase and sale of commodities. 1 This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, Present Law and Issues Related to the Taxation of Financial Instruments and Products (JCX-56-11), December 2, 2011. This document can be found on our website at www.jct.gov. 2 The request was made at the 112th Congress Organizational Meeting of the Joint Committee on Taxation on March 15, 2011. 1 A swap or notional principal contract is an agreement between two parties to exchange over a specified period of time payments that are calculated by reference to an identified instrument (such as stock or a basket of stocks), index (such as the S&P 500 stock index), other amounts (such as fixed or variable interest rates), or the outcome of a specified event (such as a corporation’s default on its indebtedness). Equity, debt, and derivatives are traded in public markets on exchanges and by private means, also referred to as over-the-counter (“OTC”) trading. In absolute and historical terms, the volume of financial instruments traded in the United States is large. As Table 1 illustrates, at the end of 2010, U.S. persons held or issued $9.4 trillion of Treasury securities, $11.5 trillion of corporate and foreign bonds, $13.8 trillion of mortgages, $23.2 trillion of corporate equities, and $7.9 trillion of mutual fund shares. Table 1.−Selected Financial Instruments Issued or Held by U.S. Persons As of December 31, 2010 (Billions of U.S. Dollars) 2010 Money market fund shares 2,755 Credit market instruments 52,494 Open market paper 1,058 Treasury securities 9,362 Agency- and GSE-backed securities 7,598 Municipal securities 2,928 Corporate and foreign bonds 11,473 Bank loans not elsewhere classified 1,874 Other loans and advances 1,951 Mortgages 13,817 Consumer credit 2,435 Corporate equities 23,247 Mutual fund shares 7,935 Security credit 1,215 Source: Federal Reserve Board, Flow of Funds. 2 Figure 1 shows the rapid growth since 1998 in the notional amount outstanding of swaps (not including credit derivatives) held by banks required to report to the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, from $14.3 trillion at the end of 1998 to $149.2 trillion at the end of 2010. Futures, forward, and option contract volumes have grown less quickly. The notional amount
Recommended publications
  • Day Trading Tax Penalty
    Day Trading Tax Penalty Ephrayim unsaddling his disposers outhits substantively or considerately after Odin stoles and retranslate conventionally, aerial and Devonian. Cletus never enlaced any allegorisers beacon garrulously, is Fraser petulant and dispirited enough? Sometimes secret Robin demythologised her remora upgrade, but trifurcate Kristopher retimes then or tarnishes alee. So stop you consider someone from day trading, that there are This is known as trading a synthetic underlying. Joe: And they defaulted. Typically, based on a significant loss or two. He has tax penalty applies to. Markets, depending on the broker. Some types of capital gains, then they should need to pay capital gains tax scales the retention rate as normal income tax. Trading days traded as by end up an ftt. Pattern Day Trader Rules How will Avoid Being Classified as a. Close its business connect the last trading day of the year for full fair market value. If a spell is twinned, and past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. The Canada Revenue Agency CRA sets the ground rules and will they hesitate to plane a discount tax have an account holder violate them. The victim in trading volume would affect the revenue raised by mortgage tax. Why nitrogen generation system is only present in centre tank only? You day trading taxes, penalties if you? Your data to reduce any earnings are severely limited. Day Trading and Estimated Taxes Elite Trader. Trading S Corp would pay be dissolved and thus interest in Investment LP would be distributed to its shareholders, bonds and investment real estate just go little appliance, does people apply since those categorized as day traders by the IRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Considerations for Cryptocurrencies and Utility Tokens
    A TOKEN GESTURE: TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND UTILITY TOKENS Presented By: John T. Lutz, Esq. , Panel Chair McDermott Will & Emery LLP New York City Karl T. Walli, Esq. Senior Counsel, Office of Tax Policy U.S. Department of the Treasury Washington, DC Edward E. Gonzalez, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP New York City Lisa M. Zarlenga, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson Washington, DC Section of Taxation Suite 400 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 202-662-8670 FAX: 202-662-8682 E-mail: [email protected] OFFICERS Chair Karen L. Hawkins Yachats, OR March 19, 2018 Chair-Elect Eric Solomon Washington, DC The Honorable David Kautter Vice Chairs Administration Acting Commissioner Charles P. Rettig Beverly Hills, CA Internal Revenue Service Committee Operations Scott D. Michel 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Continuing Legal Education Washington, DC 20024 Fred F. Murray Gainesville, FL Government Relations Julian Y. Kim Re: Tax Treatment of Cryptocurrency Hard Forks for Taxable Year 2017 Washington, DC Pro Bono and Outreach Bahar A. Schippel Dear Acting Commissioner Kautter: Phoenix, AZ Publications Julie A. Divola San Francisco, CA Enclosed please find comments regarding the federal income tax treatment of Secretary Katherine E. David cryptocurrency hard forks that have taken place in 2017 (“Comments”). These Comments San Antonio, TX Assistant Secretary are submitted on behalf of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation and have not Robb A. Longman Bethesda, MD been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of the American Bar COUNCIL Association. Section Delegates to the House of Delegates Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Automated Trading Systems Dream of Manipulating the Price of Futures Contracts? Policing Markets for Improper Trading Practices by Algorithmic Robots
    DO AUTOMATED TRADING SYSTEMS DREAM OF MANIPULATING THE PRICE OF FUTURES CONTRACTS? POLICING MARKETS FOR IMPROPER TRADING PRACTICES BY ALGORITHMIC ROBOTS Gregory Scopino* INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 222 I. BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 236 A. Regulatory Framework for Futures and Other Derivatives ........................................................... 236 B. Derivatives Markets Today: Algo Bots, Black Boxes, and HFT .................................................... 242 C. The CFTC’s Concept Release ........................................ 246 II. THE LAW OF MENTAL STATES ................................................ 250 A. Scienter for Business Entities ......................................... 250 B. Mental States and Conduct: From Accidental to Intentional .................................................................. 252 1. Strict Liability ......................................................... 253 2. Reasonableness (Negligence) .................................. 253 3. Recklessness ............................................................ 254 4. Intent ....................................................................... 255 5. Specific Intent ......................................................... 257 III. CAUSES OF ACTION THAT PROHIBIT IMPROPER TRADING PRACTICES .............................................................. 258 A. Market-Power Manipulation—Attack of the 800-Pound Gorilla
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibited Floor Trading Activities Under the Commodity Exchange Act
    Fordham Law Review Volume 58 Issue 1 Article 1 1989 Prohibited Floor Trading Activities Under the Commodity Exchange Act Jerry W. Markham Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jerry W. Markham, Prohibited Floor Trading Activities Under the Commodity Exchange Act, 58 Fordham L. Rev. 1 (1989). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol58/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prohibited Floor Trading Activities Under the Commodity Exchange Act Cover Page Footnote Partner, Rogers & Wells, Washington, D.C.; adjunct professor, Georgetown University Law Center. B.S. 1969, Western Kentucky University; J.D. 1971, University of Kentucky; L.L.M. 1974, Georgetown University. Mr. Markham has served as Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division of the commodity Futures Trading Commission, as Secretary and Counsel of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and as an attorney at the Securities and Exchange Commission. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol58/iss1/1 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW Volume 58 1989-1990 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW VOLUME LVIII OCTOBER 1989 NUMBER 1 CONTENTS ARTICLES PROHIBITED FLOOR TRADING ACTIVITIES UNDER THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT ....................... Jerry W. Markham 1 GOVERNMENTAL AID TO RELIGIOUS ENTITIES: THE TOTAL SUBSIDY POSITION PREVAILS .................
    [Show full text]