DOCSLIB.ORG

Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850 Cleveland State Law Review Volume 17 Issue 3 Article 19 1968 Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850 William H. Vodrey Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Legal Writing and Research Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation William H. Vodrey, Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850, 17 Clev.-Marshall L. Rev. 583 (1968) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 583 Records and Sources of Ohio Law From 1787-1850 William H. Vodrey* TABLE OF CONTENTS (Sequence) Preface ------------------------------------------------------ 584 Records and Sources I. Basic Documents A. Northwest Territory --- --------------- 585 B. Ohio Constitutional Convention ------------------------- 585 II. Laws of Ohio A. Miscellaneous Compilations ---------------------------- 586 B. Indexes ---------------------------------------------- 588 III. Reports of Ohio Cases A. Senate ------------------------------------------------ 589 B. Supreme Court --------------------------------------- 590 C. Common Pleas Courts --------------------------------- 592 D. Federal Courts ---------------------------------------- 594 E. Digests ------------------------------------------------ 594 IV. Form Books, Guides, Manuals ---------------------------- 595 V. Controversial & Scholarly Writings ------------------------ 601 VI. Non-Legal Topics ------------------------------------------ 609 Bibliography ------------------------------------------------- 611 Indexes I. Authors ------------------------------------------------- 612 II. Titles --------------------------------------------------- 613 * Of the East Liverpool, Ohio Bar. Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 1968 1 17 CLEV-MAR. L. R. (3) Sept. 1968 Preface This check list includes records and sources relating to Ohio law from 1787 to 1850. The imprint is included without regard to the place of printing, if it relates to Ohio law. A few items after 1850 are included, where appropriate. However, the Session Laws and Statutes of Ohio and the Northwest Territory have not been included since they are the subject of other check lists which are devoted to those two subjects. With regard to Ohio Session Laws, a note of caution should be made. There are a number of Ohio militia laws not in the Ohio Session Laws. These are catalogued in the check list of Session Laws. A further omission is the location of all copies of a given record or source. In some cases, this would run as high as twenty copies. In all cases the standard law and historical libraries in Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus are listed. Other locations are shown depending upon the rarity of the imprint. A debt of gratitude is owed Chief Justice C. T. Marshall of Ohio who first explored this field in his History of the Courts and Lawyers of Ohio (1934), Vol. III, pg. 643. Next came Douglas C. McMurtrie of Chicago in the check list of Ohio Imprints (1941). Mr. McMurtrie and another scholar, many years ago, started me on this project. The other was Dean Zimmerman of Cleveland who knew more about Ohio law books than anyone else, although not a lawyer. I regret that I cannot offer this survey to each of them, since all three are gone. In lieu, I tender the wreath, as to all victors. To the many librarians who have helped me over the years, I return my grateful thanks. But here again some who were most generous have departed. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol17/iss3/19 2 SOURCES OF OHIO LAW TO 1850 RECORDS AND SOURCES RELATING TO OHIO LAW I. The Basic Documents A. Northwest Territory *(1) An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States, Northwest of the River Ohio. (New York. Printed by Francis Childs for John Dunlap of Philadelphia, official printer to Congress, 1787) Folio 2 pp. The Ordinances were not printed in book form at the time. It is included in the Constitutions of the United States, etc., Philadelphia 1802. District of Columbia-Washington-Lib. of Cong.-3 copies Massachusetts-Boston-Mass. Hist. Soc. New York-New York-Pub. Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Columbus-Ohio Hist. Soc. Ohio-Marietta-College-3 copies Pennsylvania-Philadelphia-Hist. Soc. Rhode Island-Providence-J. C. Brown For the Ordinance of 1787 see Wm. P. Cutler. 1 Ohio Arch. & Hist. Soc. 10 (1887) Chas. B. Galbreath-33 Ohio Arch. & Hist. Soc. 110 (1924) B. OHIO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION. Chillicothe. 1802 (2) Journal of the Convention- Chillicothe. N. Willis. 1802, 46 p. California-San Marino-Huntington Illinois-Chicago-Hist. Soc. New York-New York City-Pub. Lib. New York-New York City-Hist. Soc. Ohio-Cincinnati-Hist. Soc. Ohio-Cincinnati-Law Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Columbus-Ohio. Hist. Soc. Obio-Columbus-Sup. Ct. Ohio-Marietta-College (3) Constitution of the State of Ohio- Chillicothe. N. Willis. 1802 32 p. Massachusetts-Boston-Mass. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. * Black face figures in parenthesis at left indicate that this item is shown in the Index at end of this paper. Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 1968 3 17 CLEV-MAR. L. R. (3) Sept. 1968 Ohio-Columbus-State Lib. Ohio-Columbus--Ohio Hist. Soc. Ohio-Marietta-College Pennsylvania-Philadelphia-Hist. Soc. (4) Constitution of the State of Ohio-- Cincinnati. Carpenter & Findlay. 1802 24 p. Ohio-Cincinnati-Law Lib. Ohio-Marietta-College (5) Letter from Thomas Worthington enclosing an Ordinance passed by the Convention of the State of Ohio, together with the Constitution-. 23d December, 1802, 35 p. Washington (No Printer) Dist. Columbia-Washington-Lib. Cong. Massachusetts-Boston-Athenaeum Massachusetts-Boston-Pub. Lib. Massachusetts-Cambridge-Harvard Law Lib. New York-Albany-State Law Lib. Ohio-Cincinnati-Hist. Soc. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey (6) Constitution of the State of Ohio. Second Edition Chillicothe. N. Willis. 1803 31 p. Dist. Columbia-Washington-Lib. Cong. New York-Ithaca-Cornell Law 28 p. only Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. (7) Constitution of the State of Ohio. Chillicothe. N. Willis. 1803. 31 p. Connecticut-New Haven-Hist. Soc. New York-New York-Law Inst. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey U. Acts and Laws of Ohio A. Miscellaneous Ohio Compilations (8) Laws-for-New Counties. Chillicothe. Collins & Co. 1809. 55 p. Illinois-Chicago-Law Inst. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey (9) Laws-Establishing Miami University- Hamilton, Ohio. Keen & Stewart for James M'Bride. 1814. 68 (2) p. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol17/iss3/19 4 SOURCES OF OHIO LAW TO 1850 New York-New York-Hist. Soc. New York-New York-Pub. Lib. Ohio--Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Columbus-St. Lib. Ohio-Oxford-Miami Univ. (10) (Swan, Gustavus.) A Compilation of Laws-which relate to lands in-Ohio. Columbus. Geo. Nashee. 1825. 534 p. Swan was appointed by the Legislature to compile these laws. 22 Ohio Local Laws 187; 23 Ohio Local Laws 108, 112; 24 Ohio General Laws 98. Ohio-Cincinnati-Law Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-Law Lib. Ohio-Columbus-Ohio Hist. Soc.; Oh. St. Lib.; Sup. Ct. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey (11) GESETZE des Statts Ohio. Lancaster (Ohio) Herman und Gruber. 1826 51 p. The pamphlet contains Seven Acts as provided by the Reso- lution in 24 Ohio Local Laws 116 (1826). Acts and Resolu- tions for the printing in German of certain laws of Ohio were passed from 1817 to 1834. Although each printing was ordered in quantities of at least 1000 copies, only this one can be located. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey (12) Laws relating to Miami University- Cincinnati. F. S. Benton. 1833. 148 p. Dist. Columbia-Washington-Lib. Cong. Ohio-Cincinnati-Hist. Soc. Ohio-Cincinnati-Law Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Columbus-Ohio Hist. Soc. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey Ohio-Oxford-Miami Univ. (13) Walker, Georg. Deutsches Gesetzbuch. Germantown (Ohio) Walker u. Espich. 1839. 314 p. The title page may be translated: "German Lawbook: con- taining besides the Declaration of Independence and Con- stitution of the United States; the Constitution and General Laws of the State of Ohio." This is the only known privately printed German Law Book for Ohio. Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 1968 5 17 CLEV-MAR. L. R. (3) Sept. 1968 Illinois-Urbana-Univ. Ill. Ohio-Cincinnati-Hist. Soc. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey (14) Laws relating to Ohio University- Cincinnati. Brough. 1841. 19 p. Ohio-Athens-Ohio Univ. Ohio-Cincinnati-Law Lib. B. Indexes to Laws of Ohio (15) A copious Index-Laws of-Ohio. By a gentleman of the bar. Marietta. Israel & Gardiner. 1809. 16 p. First privately printed lawbook in Ohio. New York-New York City-Columbia Law Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Marietta-College (16) Nagle, Jacob. Index and Epitome-Laws of-Ohio. St. Clairsville, Alexander Armstrong. 1816. 38 p. No Title Page. For author see Caldwell, J.A.: History of Belmont & Jefferson Counties, pp. 228-229 (1880). Ohio-Cincinnati-Law Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-Law Lib. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-Columbus-Franklin Co. Law Lib. Ohio-Columbus-Ohio Hist. Soc. Ohio-Columbus-Sup. Ct. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey (17) Nye, A(rius) A concise Alphabetical Index-Laws of Ohio. Zanesville-E. Putnam. 1817. 32 p. For the author see Reed, Bench and Bar of Ohio, Vol. 1, page 210. Chicago. 1897. Ohio-Cleveland-West. Res. Hist. Soc. Ohio-East Liverpool-Vodrey Ohio-Marietta-College Ohio-Toledo-Edwin J. Marshall Pennsylvania-Philadelphia-Univ. Penna. Autograph of Arius Nye. (18) An Alphabetical Index to the Laws of Ohio. 32 p. No title page, place, date, author or printer. The text differs only slightly from that of Nye. New York-New York City-Bar Assn. Ohio-Cincinnati-Law. Lib. Pennsylvania-Philadelphia-Bar Assn. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol17/iss3/19 6 SOURCES OF OHIO LAW TO 1850 (19) Mills, Zechariah.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Color Line in Ohio Public Schools, 1829-1890
    THE COLOR LINE IN OHIO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1829-1890 DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By LEONARD ERNEST ERICKSON, B. A., M. A, ****** The Ohio State University I359 Approved Adviser College of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is not the work of the author alone, of course, but represents the contributions of many persons. While it is impossible perhaps to mention every­ one who has helped, certain officials and other persons are especially prominent in my memory for their encouragement and assistance during the course of my research. I would like to express my appreciation for the aid I have received from the clerks of the school boards at Columbus, Dayton, Toledo, and Warren, and from the Superintendent of Schools at Athens. In a similar manner I am indebted for the courtesies extended to me by the librarians at the Western Reserve Historical Society, the Ohio State Library, the Ohio Supreme Court Library, Wilberforce University, and Drake University. I am especially grateful to certain librarians for the patience and literally hours of service, even beyond the high level customary in that profession. They are Mr. Russell Dozer of the Ohio State University; Mrs. Alice P. Hook of the Historical and Philosophical Society; and Mrs. Elizabeth R. Martin, Miss Prances Goudy, Mrs, Marion Bates, and Mr. George Kirk of the Ohio Historical Society. ii Ill Much of the time for the research Involved In this study was made possible by a very generous fellowship granted for the year 1956 -1 9 5 7, for which I am Indebted to the Graduate School of the Ohio State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Laws
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 6 Issue 3 Article 9 1955 Conflict of Laws Fletcher R. Andrews Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Fletcher R. Andrews, Conflict of Laws, 6 W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 227 (1955) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol6/iss3/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 19551 SURVEY OF OHIO LAW- 1954 An action shall be deemed to be commenced within the meaning of sections 2305.03 to 2305.22, inclusive ... as to each defendant, at the date of the summons which is served on him or on a co-defendant who is ...united in interest with him," would help them out of the dilemma. The court pointed out, however, that no heir at law was united in interest with executrix or the legatee,60 and that none of the three originally named heirs at law had ever been served at all, so that there was no need to determine whether service on one of them would have satisfied the statute as to the other two or as to those not even named. Furthermore, the statute only applies to defendants, and its plain provisions cannot be avoided by making defendants into plaintiffs, after the limitation had expired.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Rules of Evidence
    OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope of rules: applicability; privileges; exceptions 102 Purpose and construction; supplementary principles 103 Rulings on evidence 104 Preliminary questions 105 Limited admissibility 106 Remainder of or related writings or recorded statements Article II JUDICIAL NOTICE 201 Judicial notice of adjudicative facts Article III PRESUMPTIONS 301 Presumptions in general in civil actions and proceedings 302 [Reserved] Article IV RELEVANCY AND ITS LIMITS 401 Definition of “relevant evidence” 402 Relevant evidence generally admissible; irrelevant evidence inadmissible 403 Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion, or undue delay 404 Character evidence not admissible to prove conduct; exceptions; other crimes 405 Methods of proving character 406 Habit; routine practice 407 Subsequent remedial measures 408 Compromise and offers to compromise 409 Payment of medical and similar expenses 410 Inadmissibility of pleas, offers of pleas, and related statements 411 Liability insurance Article V PRIVILEGES 501 General rule Article VI WITNESS 601 General rule of competency 602 Lack of personal knowledge 603 Oath or affirmation Rule 604 Interpreters 605 Competency of judge as witness 606 Competency of juror as witness 607 Impeachment 608 Evidence of character and conduct of witness 609 Impeachment by evidence of conviction of crime 610 Religious beliefs or opinions 611 Mode and order of interrogation and presentation 612 Writing used to refresh memory 613 Impeachment by self-contradiction
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Elections in Ohio
    Chapter 8 Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Elections in Ohio Major and Minor Parties in Ohio Ohio has a very rich history of strong political parties. The Ohio Democratic Party is older than the Republican Party, having its origins in the foundingdistribute period of the state. Initially, a party known as the Federalists served as the main rival to the Dem- ocratic Party (or the Democratic or Jeffersonian Republicans,or as they were sometimes know). As the Federalist Party faded, the Whig Party emerged as the opponent of the Democrats.1 The Whigs were strong in the “Western Reserve” part of the state, which is the northeast corner of Ohio. The Whig Party held to strong abolitionist views and so served as the natural core for the emergence of Republican Party in Ohio in the 1850s. post, Beyond the Democrats and the Republicans, minor political parties have struggled to gain ballot access and sustain their legal status in Ohio. In the 2012 general election, no minor parties received even 1 percent of the vote, although the Libertarian Party presidential candidate came close, receiving .89 percent of the popular vote. Among thecopy, other minor parties, the Socialist Party presidential can- didate received .05 percent of the vote, while the Constitution Party received .15 percent and the Green Party received .33 percent. Even thoughnot third parties do not currently have much hope for winning the plurality of the vote necessary to actually be awarded an office in Ohio, they can affect a close election by siphoning off votes that might otherwise go to one of the majorDo party candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Family of Rev. Obadiah Holmes
    NYPL RESEARCH LIBRARIES 3 3433 07897461 9 ,-•«*• V V \ \ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/americanfamilyofOOholm , THE AMERICAN FAMILY OF REV. OBADIAH HOLMES BY COL. J. T. HOLMES > I > <> » • ' , • • I > t a. » . • » u • « • I • • • • . • * • , , • • . ' • , » • • • • . » • . ... » , • ' • • ' . • • • t »»»,»», • '•,' ' • J » * * » , " ' , • ' I {•••i, la I,' •• COLUMBUS. OHIO 1 9:iJ5 682314 COPYRIGHTED. 19 15 c c c c c c t "- c c c c . c c c C C C C I **> c r - c c < c cc ccc c t e e c t c c C c c c t c c A LINE OF ANCESTORS I Obadiah Holmes Katherine Hyde b. 1606 b. 1608? Manchester, Eng. Manchester, Eng. m. 1630 \ d. 1682 d. 1684 Newport, R. I. Newport, R. I. II Jonathan Holmes Sarah Borden b. 1633-4 b. 1644 Manchester, Eng. Portsmouth, R. I. m. 1665 d. 1713 d. 1708? Newport, R. I. Newport, R. I. III Obadiah Holmes Alice Ashton b. 1666 ;;,. b: 1671 ;,.•;''. ;;'!/ '• ' '' • Gravesend, Long Island, N . Y « I^^fiddlctown, N. T'." m 1696 d. 1745 d. 'i?l'6'" • ' Middletown, N. J. MididktbWh; N, 'f: V IV Joseph Holmes Elizabeth Ashton b. 1698 b. 1700? Middletown, N. J. Upper Freehold, N. J. m. 1722-3 d. 1777 d. 1750 Upper Freehold, N. J. Upper Freehold, N. J. 3 ' A Line of Ancestors V Obadiah Holmes Mary Clunn b. 1728 b. 1732 Upper Freehold, N. J. Lamberton, N. J. m. 1755 d. 1794 d. 1812 \\'ellsburg. Vs.. Indian Shortcreek, Ohio. VI Joseph Holmes Sarah AIcNabb b. 1771 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Constitutional Framework of Ohio State Government
    Chapter 1 The Constitutional Framework of Ohio State Government Image courtesy of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board Advisory and Review Square Capitol the of courtesy Image Statehouse Map Room What is a Constitution? A constitution is the fundamental law of a state or nation. It is a written document agreed to by the people and thus derives its authority from those it governs. A constitution establishes the nature and character of the state or national government. It organizes government into various branches, prescribes their powers, and specifies the extent to which these powers may be exercised. The Ohio Constitution is the fundamental law of Ohio and is subject only to the restrictions of the United States Constitution, acts of Congress, and international treaties to which the United States is a party. It may be changed only by voter approval of proposed amendments. Like the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution organizes government into three separate branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. Each branch is independent of the other two and has defined powers and responsibilities. All laws enacted by the legislative branch must comply with the Constitution’s provisions; those that do not are unenforceable. LSC A Guidebook for Ohio Legislators Page | 1 Chapter 1: The Constitutional Framework of the Ohio State Government Ohio’s first constitution was approved by Congress in 1802 as a first step to Ohio’s admission to the Union as a state. Ohio’s second constitution, the Constitution of 1851, as subsequently amended, is today’s fundamental law of Ohio. A constitution is the fundamental law of a state or nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850 William H
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 1968 Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850 William H. Vodrey Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Legal Writing and Research Commons How does access to this work benefit oy u? Let us know! Recommended Citation William H. Vodrey, Records and Sources of Ohio Law from 1787-1850, 17 Clev.-Marshall L. Rev. 583 (1968) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 583 Records and Sources of Ohio Law From 1787-1850 William H. Vodrey* TABLE OF CONTENTS (Sequence) Preface ------------------------------------------------------ 584 Records and Sources I. Basic Documents A. Northwest Territory --- --------------- 585 B. Ohio Constitutional Convention ------------------------- 585 II. Laws of Ohio A. Miscellaneous Compilations ---------------------------- 586 B. Indexes ---------------------------------------------- 588 III. Reports of Ohio Cases A. Senate ------------------------------------------------ 589 B. Supreme Court --------------------------------------- 590 C. Common Pleas Courts --------------------------------- 592 D. Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Government in Ohio Before 1912 HARVEY WALKER*
    OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL Volume 9 1948 Number 1 Municipal Government in Ohio Before 1912 HARVEY WALKER* While the Constitutional Convention was laboring behind closed doors in the summer heat of 1787 in Philadelphia, little bands of pioneers from Massachusetts -and Connecticut were cross- Ing the Alleghenies to Sumrills Ferry, Pennsylvania. There, during the fall and winter of 1787-88, they built boats to carry them to the Ohio, and down that mighty stream to the mouth of the Mus- kingum, where they arrived on April 7, 1788 to establish the first town in the Northwest Territory, Marietta.' Arthur St. Clanr, the first governor- of the Northwest Territory, arrived on July 9 to make it the seat of government in the Territory A few months later, in the fall of 1788, another town was settled, opposite the mouth of the Licking River, on the north bank of the Ohio. This settlemnt was more advantageously located than the first and Governor St. Clair moved the territorial offices there from Marietta in the fall of 1789 and christened the town Cincin- nati after the noted post-war Revolutionary society Other early settlements, prior to statehood, in 1802, were: Gallipolis (1790), Manchester (1791), Chillicothe (1796), Dayton (1796), Franklinton (1797), Cleveland (1796), Youngstown (1798), Warren (1799) and Ravenna (1799) From 1788 to 1799 the government of the Territory was vested in a governor, a secretary, and three judges. This group was given legislative authority until such time as the population of the terri- tory should be sufficient to warrant the election of a legislative assembly To this group, then, was given authority to establish units of local government.
    [Show full text]
  • JUN 2,4 2010 CLERK of Coiiht
    ^^.^ 31^a^1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO. JAMES W. SCHULTZ And JULIE SCHULTZ Plaintiffs-Appellants On Appeal from the V. Tenth Appellate District No. 09AP-900 UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI College of Medicine, Defendant-Appellee --- ----------- APPELLANTS' MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION Respectfully submitted, lohn ITfIVIetz [O)Yro)t#0019039] 1117 Edwards Ro Cincinnati, Ohio 45208-3412 (513) 321-8844 JUN 2,4 2010 Fax: (513) 321-6389 e-mail: [email protected] CLERK OF COIiHT Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellants LSU2RE9GOURT OF 0HI0 Opyosing Counsel: Brian M. Kneafsey, Jr., [#00614411 James P. Triona [#00142721 Asst. Attorney General 2021 Auburn Avenue Court of Claims Defense Section Cincinnati, Ohio 45219 150 E. Gay Street, 18th Floor (513) 576-1060 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Fax: (513) 576-8792 (614) 466-7447 Fax: (614) 644-9185 jtrionana tcl-law.net bkneafseynn ae.state.oh.us Personal Counsel -Dr. Dunsker Attorney for defendants-appellees TABLE OF CONTENTS AND PROPOSITIONS OF LAW L WIIY THIS CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND WHY IT IS PUBLIC OR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST ........................................................................... 1 A. PROCEDURAL POSTURE ....................................................... 6 B. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS .................................................. 7 U. ARGUMENT ... ..... .... ...... ........ .......... ... ............ ...... ............ .... 8 PROPOSITION OF LAW NO.1 ................................................................8 1. In making a determination of "immunity" the Court of Claims must consider the entire set of circumstances including any admissions by the defendant. 2. When a state employee swears that his activity which brought about a lawsuit against them is "outside activity" from their State employment, they cannot disavow such sworn representation and claim immunity pursuant to ORC 9.86. PROPOSITION OF LAW NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct
    OHIO RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT (Effective February 1, 2007; as amended effective June 17, 2020) TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilities; Scope 1 1.0 Terminology 5 Client-Lawyer Relationship 1.1 Competence 11 1.2 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and 14 Lawyer 1.3 Diligence 18 1.4 Communication 20 1.5 Fees and Expenses 24 1.6 Confidentiality of Information 31 1.7 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients 39 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules 50 1.9 Duties to Former Clients 61 1.10 Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule 65 1.11 Special Conflicts of Interest for Former and Current Government Officers 70 and Employees 1.12 Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator, or Other Third-Party Neutral 74 1.13 Organization as Client 77 1.14 Client with Diminished Capacity 82 1.15 Safekeeping Funds and Property 86 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation 92 1.17 Sale of Law Practice 96 1.18 Duties to Prospective Client 102 Counselor 2.1 Advisor 105 2.2 [Reserved for future use; no corresponding ABA Model Rule] 2.3 Evaluation for Use by Third Persons 107 2.4 Lawyer Serving as Arbitrator, Mediator, or Third-Party Neutral 110 Advocate 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contentions 112 3.2 Expediting Litigation [Not Adopted; See Note] 113 3.3 Candor toward the Tribunal 114 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel 119 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal 121 3.6 Trial Publicity 124 3.7 Lawyer as Witness 127 3.8 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor 130 3.9 Advocate in Nonadjudicative
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Control of Liquor in Ohio
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 31 1961 Municipal Control of Liquor in Ohio Reese Taylor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Reese Taylor, Municipal Control of Liquor in Ohio, 12 W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 377 (1961) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol12/iss2/31 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1961] NOTES Municipal Control of Liquor In Ohio Do Ohio municipalities have the power to control the consumption of and the traffic in intoxicating liquor within their territorial limits? Consider the recent experience of the City of Lakewood in attempting to exercise some measure of control over the location of a retail liquor out- let. The city passed an ordinance prohibiting the operation of such a business within 800 feet of a school, church, library or public play- ground.' Contrary to this, a permit holder began selling intoxicating liquor at a location situated approximately 650 feet from one of the above named premises, and the city promptly cited her for violating the ordinance. The permit holder then sought and was granted an injunc- tion to restrain the enforcement of the ordinance,' and the injunction was upheld on appeal There was no finding that the City of Lakewood could not legislate on the subject of intoxicating liquor.
    [Show full text]