DOCSLIB.ORG

DHS Has Not Effectively Implemented the Prompt Asylum Pilot Programs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DHS Has Not Effectively Implemented the Prompt Asylum Pilot Programs DHS Has Not Effectively Implemented the Prompt Asylum Pilot Programs January 25, 2021 OIG-21-16 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 / www.oig.dhs.gov January 2, 2021 MEMORANDUM FOR: Troy Miller Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner U.S. Customs and Border Protection Tracy Renaud Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FROM: Joseph V. Cuffari, Ph.D. Digitally signed by JOSEPH V JOSEPH V CUFFARI Inspector General Date: 2021.01.21 16:33:47 CUFFARI -05'00' SUBJECT: DHS Has Not Effectively Implemented the Prompt Asylum Pilot Programs Attached for your information is our final report, DHS Has Not Effectively Implemented the Prompt Asylum Pilot Programs. We incorporated the formal comments from DHS in the final report. Consistent with our responsibility under the Inspector General Act, we will provide copies of our report to congressional committees with oversight and appropriation responsibility over the Department of Homeland Security. We will post the report on our website for public dissemination. Please call me with any questions, or your staff may contact Thomas Kait, Assistant Inspector General for Special Reviews and Evaluations, at (202) 981-6000. Attachment DHS OIG HIGHLIGHTS DHS Has Not Effectively Implemented the Prompt Asylum Pilot Programs January 25, 2021 What We Found DHS has not effectively implemented the PACR and HARP Why We Did programs. Within the Department, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Citizenship and This Review Immigration Services (USCIS) share responsibility for managing PACR and HARP. Because of rapid In recent years, the United implementation and expansion of the programs, DHS States has experienced a components did not adequately consider several factors surge in migrants crossing necessary to support their operations. Specifically, our the southern border to seek initial review and visit to the El Paso sector disclosed: asylum. In October 2019, DHS began pilots of the x few metrics were implemented to measure the Prompt Asylum Claim programs’ effectiveness in meeting goals; Review (PACR) and x a program goal of 7 to 10-day maximum detention Humanitarian Asylum is inconsistent with CBP detention standards and Review Process (HARP) was routinely exceeded; programs to quickly process x due to facility limitations, multiple families were co- migrants with claims of located, with limited assurance of privacy and credible fear. We conducted separation of juveniles from unrelated adults; this review to evaluate DHS’ x consultation areas and legal amenities were not effectiveness to date in conducive to allowing aliens to prepare for credible- implementing the programs. fear screening interviews; This interim report is based x staff resources were inadequate to manage the on observations from our programs; and visit to the El Paso, TX x data systems were not interoperable, necessitating border sector. labor-intensive and error-prone manual efforts to track and share information across components. What We As of April 15, 2020, DHS had deployed the pilot Recommend programs to most sectors on the southern border. Going forward, DHS should consider and take actions to address We made six the issues we identified, to better ensure effectiveness in recommendations to fulfilling mission goals. improve PACR and HARP program implementation. DHS Response For Further Information: DHS officials did not concur with five recommendations Contact our Office of Public Affairs at and concurred with one. We consider these five (202) 981-6000, or email us at [email protected] recommendations unresolved and open and one recommendation resolved and open. www.oig.dhs.gov OIG-21-16 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Department of Homeland Security Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................... 3 Results of Review ............................................................................................ 8 Few Metrics Were Implemented to Measure Pilot Programs’ Effectiveness.......................................................................................... 8 Program Goal of 7 to 10-Day Maximum Detention Is Inconsistent with CBP Detention Standards and Was Routinely Exceeded....................... 11 Assurance of Privacy and Separation of Juveniles from Unrelated Adults Is Limited at El Paso Facility ................................................................ 13 Consultation Areas and Legal Amenities Are Not Conducive to Allowing Aliens to Prepare for Credible-Fear Screening Interviews ...................... 16 Staff Resources Were Inadequate to Effectively Manage the Programs .. 20 Data System Limitations Entailed Labor-Intensive and Error-Prone Manual Efforts to Track and Share Information ................................... 23 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 24 Recommendations......................................................................................... 25 Appendixes Appendix A: Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................. 32 Appendix B: DHS Comments to the Draft Report ................................. 34 Appendix C: PACR and HARP Processes Compared to Standard Expedited Removal/Credible Fear Process ........................ 41 Appendix D: PACR and HARP Process Flowchart.................................. 42 Appendix E: Special Reviews and Evaluations Major Contributors to This Report ...................................................................... 43 Appendix F: Report Distribution .......................................................... 44 Abbreviations CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations CPC Centralized Processing Center www.oig.dhs.gov OIG-21-16 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Department of Homeland Security CRCL Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties EOIR Executive Office for Immigration Review FRC Family Residential Center GAO Government Accountability Office HARP Humanitarian Asylum Review Process ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement INA Immigration and Nationality Act OFO Office of Field Operations PACR Prompt Asylum Claim Review POE Port of Entry TEDS National Standards on Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search UAC Unaccompanied Alien Children U.S.C. United States Code USCIS U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services www.oig.dhs.gov OIG-21-16 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Department of Homeland Security Background The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Field Operations (OFO) manages U.S. ports of entry where officers perform immigration and customs functions, admitting admissible individuals who have valid documents for legal entry, such as visas or legal permanent resident cards. Between ports of entry, CBP’s Border Patrol detects and interdicts individuals suspected of illegally entering into the United States. Together, OFO and Border Patrol are responsible for providing short-term detention for inadmissible aliens1 arriving in the United States without valid travel documents, in compliance with the National Standards on Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search (TEDS),2 which governs CBP’s interaction with detained individuals. The Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, which works with CBP to design and implement policies, procedures, and guidance to protect the civil and human rights of detainees in DHS custody, actively participated in the development of the TEDS standards.3 Upon encountering inadmissible aliens at or between ports of entry, CBP’s OFO officers and Border Patrol agents generally determine whether to (1) place inadmissible adults and family units4 into expedited removal proceedings,5 or (2) refer them for full removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR).6 CBP transfers aliens placed into expedited removal proceedings to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for detention. ICE refers aliens who express a fear of persecution, torture, or a fear of return, or otherwise indicate an intention to apply for asylum to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), whose asylum officers conduct a credible-fear screening interview.7 Aliens receiving a positive credible fear 1 Inadmissible aliens are aliens who are ineligible for visas or admission to the United States, including aliens present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, and aliens not in possession of a valid visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document. 8 United States Code (U.S.C.) §§ 1182(a)(6)(A), (7)(A)(i)(I). 2 U.S. Customs and Border Protection, National Standards on Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search, October 2015. 3 Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Fiscal Year 2015 Annual Report to Congress, June 10, 2016. 4 Unaccompanied alien children are transferred to the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services and are not subject to expedited removal proceedings. 5 Expedited removal generally enables immigration officers to order removal of aliens determined inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act without further review or hearing before an immigration judge. 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(i). 6 8 U.S.C. §§ 1225(b)(1)(A)(ii), (B)(ii). A full removal proceeding, often referred to as a 240 proceeding, is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide
    F FAA-G-8082-22 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide August 2016 Flight Standards Service Washington, DC 20591 This page intentionally left blank. Preface The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published the Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) Study Guide to communicate the knowledge areas you need to study to prepare to take the Remote Pilot Certificate with an sUAS rating airman knowledge test. This Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide is available for download from faa.gov. Please send comments regarding this document to [email protected]. Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide i This page intentionally left blank. Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide ii Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Obtaining Assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) .............................................. 1 FAA Reference Material ...................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Applicable Regulations .......................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Airspace Classification, Operating Requirements, and Flight Restrictions .............. 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Stories
    PILOT STORIES DEDICATED to the Memory Of those from the GREATEST GENERATION December 16, 2014 R.I.P. Norm Deans 1921–2008 Frank Hearne 1924-2013 Ken Morrissey 1923-2014 Dick Herman 1923-2014 "Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth, And danced the skies on Wings of Gold; I've climbed and joined the tumbling mirth of sun-split clouds - and done a hundred things You have not dreamed of - wheeled and soared and swung high in the sunlit silence. Hovering there I've chased the shouting wind along and flung my eager craft through footless halls of air. "Up, up the long delirious burning blue I've topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace, where never lark, or even eagle, flew; and, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod the high untrespassed sanctity of space, put out my hand and touched the face of God." NOTE: Portions Of This Poem Appear On The Headstones Of Many Interred In Arlington National Cemetery. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – Dick Herman Bermuda Triangle 4 Worst Nightmare 5 2 – Frank Hearne Coming Home 6 3 – Lee Almquist Going the Wrong Way 7 4 – Mike Arrowsmith Humanitarian Aid Near the Grand Canyon 8 5 – Dale Berven Reason for Becoming a Pilot 11 Dilbert Dunker 12 Pride of a Pilot 12 Moral Question? 13 Letter Sent Home 13 Sense of Humor 1 – 2 – 3 14 Sense of Humor 4 – 5 15 “Poopy Suit” 16 A War That Could Have Started… 17 Missions Over North Korea 18 Landing On the Wrong Carrier 19 How Casual Can One Person Be? 20 6 – Gardner Bride Total Revulsion, Fear, and Helplessness 21 7 – Allan Cartwright A Very Wet Landing 23 Alpha Strike
    [Show full text]
  • Gogo Vision What's Playing
    GOGO VISION WHAT’S PLAYING CATALOG 183 MOVIES (100) TITLE TITLE NEW CONTENT Harriet A Star is Born Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets Sherlock Holmes Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 The Big Lebowski Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire The Breakfast Club Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince The Croods Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Those Who Wish Me Dead Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Addams Family, The (2019) Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone An American Pickle Horrible Bosses Batman Begins Horrible Bosses 2 Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Impractical Jokers: The Movie Bill and Ted Face the Music Invisible Man, The Birds of Prey (And the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) It's Complicated Blinded By The Light Joker Boogie Judas and the Black Messiah Coco Just Mercy Crazy Rich Asians Kajillionaire Crazy, Stupid, Love Let Them All Talk Die Hard Lilo and Stitch Disneys Upside-Down Magic Limbo Doctor Sleep Locked Down E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial Lucy in the Sky Elf Marvel Studios' Black Panther Emma Marvel Studios’ Avengers: Infinity War Finding Dory Marvel’s the Avengers: Age of Ultron Finding Nemo Minions Frozen 2 Mortal Kombat Godzilla v. Kong Mulan Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 My Spy Movies 1 TITLE News of the World The Dark Knight Nobody The Dark Knight Rises Nomadland The Kitchen Office Space The Lego Batman Movie Onward The Lego Movie Photograph, The The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part Queen & Slim
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Air-To-Ground Battle for Italy
    Air-to-Ground Battle for Italy MICHAEL C. MCCARTHY Brigadier General, USAF, Retired Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2004 Air University Library Cataloging Data McCarthy, Michael C. Air-to-ground battle for Italy / Michael C. McCarthy. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-128-7 1. World War, 1939–1945 — Aerial operations, American. 2. World War, 1939– 1945 — Campaigns — Italy. 3. United States — Army Air Forces — Fighter Group, 57th. I. Title. 940.544973—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112–6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii PREFACE . ix INTRODUCTION . xi Notes . xiv 1 GREAT ADVENTURE BEGINS . 1 2 THREE MUSKETEERS TIMES TWO . 11 3 AIR-TO-GROUND BATTLE FOR ITALY . 45 4 OPERATION STRANGLE . 65 INDEX . 97 Photographs follow page 28 iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Foreword The events in this story are based on the memory of the author, backed up by official personnel records. All survivors are now well into their eighties. Those involved in reconstructing the period, the emotional rollercoaster that was part of every day and each combat mission, ask for understanding and tolerance for fallible memories. Bruce Abercrombie, our dedicated photo guy, took most of the pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Friend, Boss, and Entertainer? the Embattled Self As a Guiding Theme in the British and American Productions of the Office
    American Remakes of British Television Transformations and Mistranslations Edited by Carlen Lavigne and Heather Marcovitch ~~'" LEXINGTON BooKS A division of ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham· Boulder· New York· Toronto· Plymouth, UK EIGHT Friend, Boss, and Entertainer? The Embattled Self as a Guiding Theme in the British and American Productions of The Office Janet J. Boseovski and Stuart Marcovitch "When people say to me, would you rather be thought of as a funny man or a great boss? My answer's always the same: to me, they're not mutually exclusive." -David Brent (British Series, Series 1, "Work Experience") "I guess the atmosphere that I've tried to create here is that I'm a friend first and a boss second, and probably an entertainer third." - Michael Scott (American Series, Season 1, "Pilot") A television series of British origin, The Office is filmed as a mock docu­ mentary examining the mundane work life of the employees of an unre­ markable paper supply company. The original British series debuted in 2001 and culminated in 12 episodes, followed by a two-part Christmas special in 2003. The American adaptation premiered in 2005, and while it was slow to develop a following in the United States, it ultimately amassed a sizable viewership and won critical acclaim with a number of major awards, including the 2006 Emmy for outstanding comedy series. 1 Given the number of stunning failures in the adaptation of television shows from Britain to North America,2 the success of The Office is intri­ guing and likely reflects a focus on issues that are universally relevant, but that have been tailored cleverly to suit the American audience.
    [Show full text]
  • OM 001-2019: Home Confinement Under the First Step
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons O P E R A T I O N S M E M O R A N D U M OPI: RSD/RRM NUMBER: 001-2019 DATE: April 4, 2019 EXPIRATION DATE: April 4, 2020 Home Confinement under the First Step Act /s/ Approved: Hugh J. Hurwitz Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons The First Step Act of 2018 (FSA) contained additional requirements for the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) in placing inmates in home confinement generally, and re-established and expanded a pilot program under the Second Chance Act to place elderly and terminally ill inmates in home confinement. The terms “home confinement” and “home detention” are used interchangeably in this Operations Memorandum. Institution Supplement. None required. Should local facilities make any changes outside the required changes in the national policy or establish any additional local procedures to implement the national policy, the local Union may invoke to negotiate procedures or appropriate arrangements. 1. HOME CONFINEMENT FOR LOW RISK OFFENDERS Section 602 of the FSA modified 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (c)(1), authorizes the Bureau to maximize the amount of time spent on home confinement when possible. The provision now states, with the new FSA language in bold, “Home confinement authority. – The authority under this subsection may be used to place a prisoner in home confinement for the shorter of 10 percent of the term of imprisonment of that prisoner or 6 months. The Bureau of Prisons shall, to the extent practicable, place prisoners with lower risk levels and lower needs on home confinement for the maximum amount of time permitted under this paragraph.” The Bureau interprets the language to refer to inmates that have lower risks of reoffending in the community, and reentry needs that can be addressed without RRC placement.
    [Show full text]
  • USPTO Performance and Accountability Report FY 2017
    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE PATENT UNITED STATES PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT AND ACCOUNTABILITY PERFORMANCE THE FUTURE United States Patent and Trademark Office PERFORMANCE & ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT FY 17 OF INNOVATION FINANCIAL AND RELATED HIGHLIGHTS % Change For the year ended For the year ended (Dollars In Thousands) 2017 over 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Fund Balance with Treasury (4.2%) $ 2,259,911 $ 2,358,227 Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net 3.9% 523,842 504,025 Other Assets 7.1% 33,421 31,212 Total Assets (2.6%) $ 2,817,174 $ 2,893,464 Deferred Revenue (2.5%) $ 936,854 $ 960,398 Accounts Payable 8.8% 101,703 93,461 Accrued Payroll, Benefits, and Leave 4.3% 251,427 241,147 Other Liabilities (0.9%) 149,638 150,936 Total Liabilities (0.4%) $ 1,439,622 $ 1 , 4 4 5 , 9 4 2 Net Position (4.8%) 1,377,552 1,447,522 Total Liabilities and Net Position (2.6%) $ 2,817,174 $ 2 , 8 9 3 , 4 6 4 Total Earned Revenue (0.9%) $ 3,105,346 $ 3,133,370 Total Program Cost 2.4% (3,193,411) (3,119,584) Net (Cost)/Income from Operations (738.8%) $ (88,065) $ 13,786 Budgetary Resources Available for Spending (0.8%) $ 3,577,570 $ 3,607,845 Net Outlays (22.6%) $ 94,625 $ 122,253 Federal Personnel (1.1%) 12,588 12,725 On-Time Payments to Vendors -% 99% 99% PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS Performance Measures FY 2017 Target FY 2017 Actual Performance Results* Patent Average First Action Pendency (months) 14.8 16.3 Not Met Patent Average Total Pendency (months) 24.8 24.2 Met Trademark Average First Action Pendency (months) 2.5–3.5
    [Show full text]
  • An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats
    Dissertations and Theses Fall 2013 An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats Yolanda Nicole Andrade Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aviation Commons, and the Ergonomics Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Andrade, Yolanda Nicole, "An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats" (2013). Dissertations and Theses. 14. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/14 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats by Yolanda Nicole Andrade A Thesis Submitted to the College of Arts and Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Human Factors and Systems Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Statement .................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Review of Literature ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Boston Public Schools DIRECTORY
    2020-2021 Boston Public Schools DIRECTORY Administrative Departments & Offices Administrative Office Staff School Organization 2020-2021 School Calendar Office Locations Schools Boston School Committee Unions Directory Alternative Programs Boston Public Schools Bruce C. Bolling Municipal Building 2300 Washington St. Roxbury, MA 02119 617-635-9000 www.bostonpublicschools.org NOVEMBER, 2020 BOSTON SCHOOL DEPARTMENT – CENTRAL OFFICE Bruce C. Bolling Municipal Building 2300 Washington Street (Nubian Square), Roxbury, MA 02119 Bolling Building Directory Floor Ferdinand Washington Waterman Warren Student, Family Student, Family & Community & Community Roof Deck Advancement Advancement NA English Language Community Rooms Partnerships 6 Learning WriteBoston Ombudsperson Superintendent Chief of Staff Senior Advisor Communications School Superintendent Chief of Engagement NA Special Education Team 5 Operations Student Support Equity Opportunity Gaps Human Capital Office of Secondary Human Capital Human Capital Schools Human Capital Business Services Recruitment, Cultivation, ART Labor Relations Finance 4 & Diversity (RCD) Opportunity Gaps Legal Advisor Planning & Analysis Extended Learning Opportunities Academics & Data & Accountability Professional Learning Student & School Early Childhood Support Informational & Excellence for All School Committee Instructional Technology Informational & 3 Health & Wellness Instructional Technology Library Services Turnaround & STEM Programming Transformation School Committee Newcomers Assessment Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • PILOTLOG PILOTLOG VOLUME 99 ISSUE 2 Submitting to The
    WINTER 2018 | VOLUME 99 | ISSUE 2 WWW.PILOTINTERNATIONAL.ORG PILOT OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF PILOT INTERNATIONALLOG Inside: President Karen Cupit Spotlight Plus: 2019 Annual Convention Pilot volunteers in communities like yours have made a big difference CONTENT Scholarship Opportunities President Karen 12 Cupit Spotlight 2019 Annual 5-6 Convention 13-15 Supporting Brain Injury Survivors New Members 7 17-18 #GivingTuesday Pilot Club News Results 8 19-21 Anchor Club News Membership Drive Updates 22-23 9 Donor Profile Matching Grant 24-25 Projects 11 Project Ideas 31 2 | WINTER 2018 PILOTLOG PILOTLOG VOLUME 99 ISSUE 2 Submitting to the PILOT INTERNATIONAL PRESIDENT Karen Cupit PILOTLOG EDITOR OF PILOT LOG Michelle Bliss We love to hear from you! Email or send by post your Pilot Club photos and news THE MISSION OF PILOT INTERNATIONAL IS: to influence positive change in communities for possible inclusion in THE PILOT LOG throughout the world. or on our Pilot International Headquarters Facebook page! TO DO THIS, WE: come together in friendship and give people an outlet for service. Here are some things to remember about WE FOCUS ON: photos: • preparing youth and young adults for service. • encouraging brain safety and health. • supporting those who care for others. • If possible, identify the Pilots, Compasses, Anchors or other subjects in the photo, The Pilot Log is the official publication of Pilot International. left to right. The Pilot Log (ISSN#1045-179X) is published quarterly at Pilot International Headquarters, • We cannot use photos clicked, saved and 102 Preston Court, Macon, Georgia 31210. downloaded from the Internet because Printed in U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusive to Our Online Version: Halloween Recipes Page 7 Th
    Welcome to the online version of The Pilot’s Halloween Edition! Exclusive to our online version: The Walking Dead Halloween Recipes episode summary page 7 Page The Best Horror Movies to Watch expedition, one traumatized and emotionally fragile This Season due to the death of her daughter and husband. Things by Sarah Maymi go horribly awry as the women find themselves stuck in a cave with seemingly no way out--and they're not It’s just a fact of life that horror movies alone. A claustrophobic and exhilarating are awesome. This film genre has been alive and experience, The Descent is primarily a great film kicking since the early 1900s--and it has only because it takes time develop the characters and makes progressed since then. I'm not sure about you, but us more attached to them. Not surprisingly, it is also I cannot think of a more convenient time to deeply terrifying--especially if you aren't a fan of dark celebrate and appreciate some of the finer horror spaces. pictures than October, the month of Halloween. Here, I present you six reviews of horror movies you should definitely make an effort to watch. THE SHINING: A film directed by the lauded, influential director Stanley Kubrick, The Shining came out in 1980 and is considered by many people to be one CARRIE: An adaption of Stephen King's first of the most intelligent horror movies ever made novel, Carrie was directed by Brian De Palma in (surprisingly, it was panned by critics on its first 1976. It tells the story of Carrie White, a young release).
    [Show full text]