History of the Interstate System in Indiana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of the Interstate System in Indiana SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING JOINT HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROJECT JHRP-75-29 HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN INDIANA VOLUME IV - COST, FUNDING AND GENERAL BENEFITS David A. Ripple .^S'. '^ PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation; Indiana Department of Transportation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofinterstOOripp Final Report HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN INDIANA TO: J. F. McLaughlin, Director December 1, 1975 Joint Highway Research Project Project: C-36-64H FROM: H. L. Michael, Associate Director Joint Highway Research Project File: 3-5-8 Attached is the Final Peport titled "History of the Interstate System in Indiana", authored by David A. Ripple a Graduate Instructor on our staff while conducting the research and authoring the Report, Professor IV. L. Grecco, formerly of our staff, directed the study during its initial year and Professor Michael supervised it during the latter years and handled the lengthy review process. The Report has been re- viewed by several personnel of the ISHC, including Mr. V.'alter Frick, and changes suggested by them have generally been made and are sincerely appreciated. The History covers the period from the late 1930 's through 1972. The Interstate System was not yet complete in 1972 and the period after 1972 is not reported herein. Perhaps it will be at a later date after the System is completed. The Report is voluminous and therefore is issued in four (4) volumes as follows: Volume I - Development of rlie National Program (Chapters I thru IV) Volume II - Evolution of Policies and Standards (Chapter V) Volume III - Route History (Chapter VI)' Volume IV - Cost, Funding and General Benefits (Chapters VII and VIII) Another volume as an Appendix which is a detailed Table titled "Interstate Highv.-ay Construction Record" is also in preparation and will be issued at a later date. A brief summary of the entire history is also in preparation. Each of the Volumes covers a part of the History and may be used separately as each is complete for the topic or topics covered. The entire set of four volumes provides an excellent in-depth reference document of the Interstate System history in Indiana and should be extremely valuable for many purposes. To my knov;ledge Indiana is the first state to prepare such a factual detailed history of the Interstate System. Sincerely, Harold L. Michael Associate Director HLMrms cc w. L. Dolch M. L. Hayes C. F. Scholer R. L. Eskew G. A. Leonards M. B. Scott G. D. Gibson C. W. Lovell K. C. Sinha W. H. Goetz R. F. Marsh L. E. Wood M. J. Gutzwiller R. D. Miles E. J. Yoder G. K. Hallock P. L. Owens S. R. Yoder D. E. Hancher G. T. Satterly Final Report HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM IN INDIANA Volume IV (Chapters VII and VIII) COST, FUNDING AND GENERAL BENEFITS by David Alan Ripple Graduate Instructor in Research Joint Highway Research Project Project No. : C-36-64H File No. : 3-5-8 Joint Highway Research Project Engineering Experiment Station Purdue University In Cooperation With Indiana State Highway Commission The contents of this Report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official viev;s or policies of the Indiana State Highway Commission or of the Joint Highway Research Project of Purdue University. Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana December, 1975 11 This dissertation is dedicated to those wlio conceived an interregional system of superhighways and to tliose who brought this concept into reality. Ill ACKNOWLEDGRMENTS With a deep sense of gratitude, the author wishes to personally thank Dr. William L. Grecco, Head of tlie Depart- ment of Civil Engineering at the University of Tennessee, for his counsel in developing the work program for this study and in implementing the first critical phases of the study. He has kindled my continued interest in urban and transportation planning and our association was an unforget- able intellectual experience. Tlic ultimate task of reviewing this report fell to Professor Harold L. Michael, Head of the Urban and Transpor- tation Engineering Department at Purdue University, who succeeded Dr. Grecco as major professor. During the compiling of the report, his guidance and constructive criticism were invaluable . Tlie participation of Dr. Gilbert T. Satterly, Jr., of tlie Urban and Transportation Engineering Department, Dr. Harvey H. Marshall, Jr., of the Department of Sociology, and Dr. David H. Root of the Department of Statistics in the re- vieiv and critique of this research was most welcome. The open cooperation of the Indiana State Highway Commission personnel in providing access to their files, in compiling data for portions of the report and in supplying information in extensive interviews was responsible to a large degree for the success of the research. The coopera- tion of the Indiana Division Office of the Federal Highway Administration and many otlier transportation related agencies throughout Indiana in providing additional information was invaluable IV The autlior also owes a debt of gratitude to the secretaries of the Joint Highway Research Project office who typed this report, the draft persons who constructed the illustrations, and his fellow students wlio offered encouragement and support for this research. Not least, I acknowledge the unrepayable del', to Melinda, my wife, for reviewing the rough drafts of this report as well as providing continual moral support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES xvi LIST OF FIGURES xix ABSTRACT xxvii CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II - THE NEED FOR AN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AND INTERSTATE SYSTEM GOALS 7 The Traditional Role of Transportation 7 Early Governincntal Involvement in Transportation 9 Governmental Involvement in Highway- Transportation on a Continuous Basis. ... 12 The Need Arises 13 Goals 14 Notes 17 CHAPTER III - DEVELOPING A PROGRAM 18 Toll Roads and Free Roads 19 The Future of Indiana Roads 23 Hij^hvs'ay Needs for National Defense 24 Planning tlie Interregional Highway System. ... 25 Interregional Highways 27 Background for Study 29 The Recommended Interregional Highway System 31 Selection of Routes for the Inter- regional System 35 Route Selection in Urban Areas 40 Access Limitation 41 Acquisition of Riglits-of -V.'ay 42 Design of the Interregional System 43 Constructing the Interregional System ... 44 Financing tlie Interregional System 45 Conclusion 50 VI TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page The First Completion Cost Estimate 51 Status of Interstate Improvement 53 Correcting the Deficiencies 56 Retrospect 58 More Studies 59 The National Highway Study 59 DuPont's Informal Advisory Committee .... 60 Needs of the Highways from 1955 to 1984 61 Highway Inadequacy 62 Highway Improvement Estimate 64 Construction Needs for the First Ten Years 65 Construction Needs for the Next Twenty Years 68 Construction Expenditure 69 Maintenance and Administrative Needs and Expenditures 71 Total Needs and Expenditures 72 Highway Improvement Financing 72 Conclusion 75 The National Highway Program Study 76 Program Recommendations 78 Inadequacy of the Present Highway Network. 80 Cost of Modernization 81 Financing the National Highway Program ... 84 Implementation of the National Highway Program 90 Report Conclusion 91 Notes 92 CHAPTER IV - THE PROGRAM AND ITS EVOLUTION 94 Construction Time 95 Manpower 97 Material and Equipment 98 Financing in General 98 Federal Highway Trust Fund 98 Highway Acts 100 Apportionment of Funds 101 Federal Share 104 Use of Funds 104 Interstate Use Restrictions 105 Administrative Policy 106 Right-of-V.'ay Acquisition 107 Inclusion of Toll Roads in the Interstate System 108 Vll TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Reimbursement for Completed Interstate Sections 109 Other Provisions 110 Indiana Motor Vehicle Fund Ill Notes 113 CHAPTER V - EVOLUTION OF POLICIES AND STANDARDS. ... 114 Planning 116 Criteria for Corridor Selection and Mileage Designation 116 Route Location Procedure 122 Location Criteria 122 Indiana's Route Location Process. 127 Evolution of the Route Alternative Evaluation Process 132 Criteria Used to Evaluate Alternatives. 132 Evaluation of Economic Analysis Techniques 134 Evolution of the Decision-Making Process . 138 Overview of the Decision Making Process 138 The Decision-Making Process in Indiana. 140 Evolution of the Review Process 141 Public Participation and the Public Hearing Process 144 Notice Offering Public Hearing . 147 Notice of Public Hearing 149 Conduct of Hearing 151 Action on Transcript 154 Notice of Request for Approval . 155 Notice of Project Approval .... 156 Other Changes in the Review Process . 157 A-95 Review - Project Notification and Review System 161 Design 167 Evolution of Design Standards 167 Influence of Forerunners on Interstate Design 174 Interstate Design Standards 176 Change in the Design Year 177 Minimum Four-Lane Requirement 178 Evolution of Pavement Design 179 Safety in Design 183 Safety Provisions for Roadside Features and Appertenances . 184 Vlll TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Evolution of the Interstate System Cross Section 188 Evolution of Bridge Design .... 196 Traffic Control and Protection Devices 210 Considerations in Grade Treatment . 211 Evaluation of Design Alternatives . 213 Evolution of the Interchange 214 Interchange Location and Spacing. 215 External Factors 216 Internal Factors 219 Special Considerations 220 Interchange Justification 224 Selection of Interchange Type 227 Interchange Design and Special Considerations 236 Other Design Features 238 Evolution of the Separation 238 Evolution of Road Closure 241 Evolution of the Frontage Road 242 Utilization of Collector-Distributor Roads 243 Federal and State Policy As It Affects Design 244 Policies on Grade Separated Crossroads Without Ramps 244 Policies on Interchanges 255 Policies on Other Roads 257 Policies on Additional Through Lane . 260 Policies on Safety Improvements .... 262 Policy on Abandonment and Revision of Plans 266 Federal Aid Financing on Completed Sections of the Interstate System. 268 ' Flexibility in Design .
Recommended publications
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Evansville, Indiana, and Henderson, Kentucky, Area
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3069 INDIANA, KENTUCKY, AND ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS Pamphlet accompanies map 87°45'00" 87°37'30" 87°30'00" 87°22'30" ° ° 38 07'30" 38 07'30" CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS Qel Qlt Qlt Qlt af1 DIACHRONOUS GEOLOGIC-TIME UNITS SURFICIAL DEPOSITS UNITS af1 (EPISODES) Man-made depositsColluvial Alluvial depositsEolian Lacustrine Lacustrine- Outwash deposits deposits deposits deposits outwash transitional af1 af2 af3 deposits af1 Qel Qc Qal Qall Qas Qaf Qafp Qat Hudson Holocene Qlt Qel Qa Qot1o Qot1g 11.5 ka Qes Qltm QltQlot Qotp Qot1 Qel Qot2 Wisconsin Qel Sangamon 127 ka QUATERNARY Qlt af1 Illinois Older Pleistocene alluvial deposits af1 780 ka af1 Qel lower middle upper QTg 1,800 ka 1.8 Ma Qlt Qlt Qel af1 Pliocene TERTIARY af1 5.3 Ma af1 Qlt Qel Qel NOT MAPPED BEDROCK af1 Qlt Desmoinesian and PENNSYLVANIAN Pz Missourian NOT MAPPED Qa af1 af1 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS wood collected from a trench, 14 ft deep, east of Evansville (see location on map, [Note: Munsell color designations of deposits appear in the format “brown (10YR 4/3)”, for UTM coordinates lat 37.99105°N., long 87.47139°W., WGS84 datum, Ron Qa Counts, KGS, written commun., 2008). An age of 33,100±590 radiocarbon years Qa example] SURFICIAL DEPOSITS B.P. (ISGS radiocarbon laboratory no. 3313) was obtained on wood from Indiana Qa Geological Survey auger hole 93-102 (Woodfield, 1998, p. 52), 52 ft deep in Qel Man-made deposits Qa deltaic-lacustrine sediments near Pigeon Creek (see symbol in north-central part of Qlt af1 Artificial fill, engineered (modern)—Unconsolidated silt and fine sand, crushed stone, map area).
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Evansville, Indiana, and Henderson, Kentucky, Area
    Surficial Geologic Map of the Evansville, Indiana, and Henderson, Kentucky, Area By David W. Moore1, Scott C. Lundstrom1, Ronald C. Counts2, Steven L. Martin2, William M. Andrews, Jr.2, Wayne L. Newell1, Michael L. Murphy2, Mark F. Thompson2, Emily M. Taylor1, Erik P. Kvale3, and Theodore R. Brandt1 1U.S. Geological Survey 2Kentucky Geological Survey 3Devon Energy Corporation, formerly with Indiana Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Indiana, Kentucky, and Illinois State Geological Surveys Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3069 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Moore, D.W., Lundstrom, S.C., Counts, R.C., Martin, S.L., Andrews, Jr., W.M., Newell, W.L., Murphy, M.L., Thomp- son, M.F., Taylor, E.M., Kvale, E.P., and Brandt, T.R., 2009, Surficial geologic map of the Evansville, Indiana, and Henderson, Kentucky, area: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Posey County Comprehensive Plan.Indd
    POSEY COUNTY FOR UNINCORPORATED POSEY COUNTY, POSEYVILLE, AND CYNTHIANA Final Comprehensive Plan Bernardin Lochmueller & Associates, Inc. Posey County Comprehensive Plan for unincorporated Posey County, Poseyville and Cynthiana Final Prepared for: Posey County Coliseum Building 126 East Third Street, Mount Vernon, Indiana 47620 Phone: (812) 838-1311 Prepared by: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, Inc. Engineering, Planning, Surveying, Environmental Studies, Water/Wastewater 6200 Vogel Road, Evansville, Indiana 47715 Phone: (812) 479-6200 Draft Final Plan published: October 31, 2008 Posey County Area Plan Commission public hearing and plan adoption: November 13, 2008 Posey County Board of Commissioners plan adoption: November 18, 2008 Poseyville Town Council plan adoption: Cynthiana Town Council plan adoption: 11/13/2008 City of Mount Vernon Comprehensive Plan OUTLINE & Posey County Comprehensive Plan (Unincorporated Posey County, Poseyville & Cynthiana) A. Purpose of Public Hearing B. Planning Process Public Hearing C. Comprehensive Plan Benefits Posey CtCounty Area Plan Comm iiission Hovey House D. Comprehensive Plan Contents Fourth at Walnut Mount Vernon, Indiana 47620 E. Community Profile F. Future Vision November 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM G. Recommendations H. Next Steps A. Purpose of Public Hearing B. Planning Process 1. Receive public comment on two draft comprehensive plans: 1. Four meetings with Mount Vernon and Posey County Steering • Mount Vernon Committees over past 7 months • Posey County –> unincorporated Posey County and incorporated Poseyville and • Identify issues and leaders to be interviewed , and prepare survey (5/07 & 13/2008) Cynthiana • Develop future vision (7/15/2008) 2. Public hearing fulfills two purposes: • Develop future alternatives (9/20/2008) • Meets State statutory requirements for adoption of a new comprehensive plan • Develop recommendations (10/15/2008) • Fulfills Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs grant requirements for the separate grants funding each plan 2.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Interstate System in Indiana: Volume 1
    SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING JOINT HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROJECT JHRP-75-26 HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN INDIANA - VOLUME I DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL PROGRAM David A. Ripple PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION Final Report HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN INDIANA TO: J. F. McLaughlin, Director December 1, 1975 Joint Highway Research Project Project: C-36-64H FROM: II. L. Michael, Associate Director Joint Highway Research Project File: 3-5-8 Attached is the Final Report titled "History of the Interstate System in Indiana", authored by David A. Ripple a Graduate Instructor on our staff while conducting the research and authoring the Report. Professor W. L. Grecco, formerly of our staff, directed the study during its initial year and Professor Michael supervised it during the latter years and handled the lengthy review process. The Report has been re- viewed by several personnel of the ISHC, including Mr. Walter Frick, and changes suggested by them have generally been made and are sincerely appreciated. The History covers the period from the late 1930 's through 1972. The Interstate System was not yet complete in 1972 and the period after 1972 is not reported herein. Perhaps it will be at a later date after the System is completed. The Report is voluminous and therefore is issued in four (4) volumes as follows: Volume I - Development of the National Program (Chapters I thru IV) Volume II - Evolution of Policies and Standards (Chapter V) Volume III - Route History (Chapter VI) Volume IV - Cost, Funding and General Benefits (Chapters VII and VIII) Another volume as an Appendix which is a detailed Table titled "Interstate Highway Construction Record" is also in preparation and will be issued at a later date.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Justice
    2011 Comment Indiana’s 2010-2035 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Public for Indiana Department of Transportation Capital Program Management Business Unit Draft Draft Version 3/29/2011 1 / | Indiana Depart. of Transportation March 29, 2011 [INDIANA’S 2010-2035 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN] Table of Contents Congestion Pricing .................................................................23 Intelligent Transportation Systems .........................................24 Introduction .................................................................................... 5 High Speed Rail ......................................................................24 The Purpose of the Long-Range Plan ............................................ 6 Alternative Fuels ....................................................................25 Federal Legislation ....................................................................... 6 Communication Systems ........................................................25 The New Plan Format .................................................................. 6 The INDOT Planning Process ..........................................................26 What Happened to the Projects? ................................................. 8 INDOT Primary Planning Partners...............................................27 Additional INDOT Vision Statements ............................................ 9 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) ...............................27 Major Moves Highway Program....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of ITS and Traffic Management in Indiana
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Purdue E-Pubs DRAFT INDOT ITS Strategic Plan Steven Wuertz Traffic Management Planning Coordinator ITS = Intelligent Transportation Systems Draft INDOT ITS Strategic Plan 92nd Purdue Road School – March 29, 2006 1 ITS = Intelligent Transportation Systems • Expensive and increasingly difficult to add capacity to highways - ITS maximizes existing capacity and safety of highways through high-tech (ATMS) and low-tech approaches (2/10 Reference Markers) • ITS: the application of technology to highways to save motorist’s lives, time, and money • Slowed/stopped traffic = safety hazard, time wasted, lost productivity (value of time) • TrafficWise: INDOT’s ITS initiative Draft INDOT ITS Strategic Plan 92nd Purdue Road School – March 29, 2006 Why Do a Strategic Plan? • No requirement, it just makes sense…assess INDOT System needs and develop strategies for the next 10 -15 years to address the needs • Most states have utilized consultants; INDOT ITS Strategic Plan developed in-house • Project-oriented recommendations that support existing INDOT / FHWA / USDOT Strategic Plans and USDOT ITS goals • Focus on primary field-oriented ITS devices (ATMS, CCTV cameras, DMS, Travel Time Signs (TTS)…new deployment for INDOT) Draft INDOT ITS Strategic Plan 92nd Purdue Road School – March 29, 2006 2 System Inventory / Assessment • Roadway in Indiana = 94,287 miles • INDOT System = 11,185 miles • Interstate System = 1,169 miles (22% of VMT on only 1.2% of roadway in Indiana)
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Risk Assessment
    3 RISK ASSESSMENT 44 CFR Requirement §201.6(c)(2): [The plan shall include] A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards. The risk assessment process identifies and profiles relevant hazards and assesses the exposure of lives, property, and infrastructure to these hazards. The goal of the risk assessment is to estimate the potential loss in Vanderburgh County, including loss of life, personal injury, property damage, and economic loss, from a hazard event. The risk assessment process allows communities in Vanderburgh County to better understand their potential risk to natural hazards and provides a framework for developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to reduce risk from future hazard events. A Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan was completed for Vanderburgh County in September 2004. Therefore, this risk assessment is an update to the risk assessment previously prepared. There are, however, several improvements: 1) Hazards to include were evaluated and refined; 2) HAZUS-MH MR5 and parcel data provided by the HMPC was utilized to determine assets at risk; and 3) HAZUS-MH MR5 results assessed vulnerability and loss estimates for earthquake, flooding, and levee failure. The risk assessment for Vanderburgh County and its jurisdictions followed the methodology described in the FEMA publication 386-2, Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses (2002), which includes a four-step process: Identify Hazards Profile Hazard Events Inventory Assets Estimate Losses This chapter is divided into four parts: hazard identification, hazard profiles, vulnerability assessment, and Summary of Key Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • INDOT 2013 Indianas 2013-2035 Future Transporation Needs Report
    2013 Indiana’s 2013‐2035 Future Transportation Needs Report “Keeping Indiana Moving” Indiana Department of Transportation Version 4/16/2013 1 Introduction | Indiana Depart. of Transportation April 16, 2013 [INDIANA’S FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS REPORT ] Table of Contents Public Transit Trends .................................................................... 39 Bike and Pedestrian Trends ......................................................... 42 Introduction ....................................................................................... 5 Freight Trends .............................................................................. 44 The Purpose of the Report ............................................................. 5 Intermodal needs ..................................................................... 44 Federal Legislation ......................................................................... 6 Overweight Trucks ................................................................... 45 The New Format ............................................................................ 6 Dedicated Truck Lanes ................................................................. 46 What Happened to the Projects? .................................................. 6 Increased Global Competition ..................................................... 47 INDOT’s Transportation Responsibility .......................................... 7 Volatile Revenues and Costs ........................................................ 48 INDOT Vision Statements
    [Show full text]
  • Separator Page
    Action Plan 67 IV. ACTION PLAN The Owensville Comprehensive Plan is a broad, community–based vision of the future of the Town of Owensville. It has been developed through analysis of current community data sources, a series of meetings with the Owensville Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, interviews with various community leaders and residents, and input gathered at the Owensville Community Visioning Workshop. From these activities five focus areas have emerged and have been further developed. • Physical Character and Land Use • Transportation • Community Services, Facilities, and Programs • Local Economy • Community Participation Each focus area represents a specific aspect of the Town of Owensville that the community has identified as an opportunity for improvement or enhancement. The focus areas are inter-related and general in nature and scope. Each focus area section gives an overall goal, several objectives that will help the community reach the goal, and specific strategies that can be pursued to meet the objectives. The strategies are “idea pieces” meant to give direction to the Town Council and its implementation teams for each objective. As the Town of Owensville accomplishes success with implementing strategies, conditions may change. Additional strategies will likely emerge. They should be encouraged and added to the effort. Some strategies may need to be revised, or some may prove to be unnecessary. All this is good and to be encouraged. A Comprehensive Plan is not intended to be a static “snapshot in time” document, but rather a guiding document that sets the community on its course in a lively, fluid way. Some of the strategies detail activities that will require the development of citizen committees and task forces.
    [Show full text]
  • POPULATION by COUNTY 200,000 150,000 Community Timeline / Línea Del Tiempo De La Comunidad 100,000
    POPULATION BY COUNTY 200,000 150,000 Community Timeline / Línea del Tiempo de la Comunidad 100,000 50,000 0 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Gibson, IN Henderson, KY Posey, IN Vanderburgh, IN War ick, IN White, IL 1100 to 1450: “Native Americans built and occupied a large city on land in present day Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties, leaving behind large earth work mounds and one of the best preserved examples of Mississippian Culture. Archeologist Glenn Black began scientific excavations during the Great Depression, with funds from the WPA.” 1814 1818 1834 1834 1841 1851 1853 1867 1868 1898 1901 1911 1912 1916 1923 1928 1930 1937 1956 1962 1965 1967 1968 1969 1973 1976 1977 1984 1992 1996 2005 2005 2010 2011 2011 2012 2017 2018 1800 1830 1860 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 1807: Native Americans 1862: “Underground Railroad” 1903: “ Geartown” Red Light District 1920 Ku Klux Klan organizes 1940: Population down from 1930 but 1962: Harrison High School opens 1980: Gilligan family murder 2001: Hispanic Community starts to grow 2005: Vectren New building opens 2010: Whirlpool closes 2015: TEDxEvansville starts The last remain Native American village Ferrocarril Subterraneo Distrito de la Luz Roja Segregation spreads 25,000 new jobs by 1940 Inicia la Preparatoria Harrison Asesinato de la Familia Gilligan Comunidad Hispana empieza a crecer Se abre el nuevo edificio de Vectren Cierra Whirlpool TEDxEvansville comienza in
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Interstate System in Indiana: Volume 3, Part 1
    SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING JOINT HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROJECT JHRP-75-28 HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN INDIANA VOLUME III - ROUTE HISTORY Part I David A. Ripple ec>. x> ^ (D So PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation; Indiana Department of Transportation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofinterst01ripp Final Report HISTORY OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM IN INDIANA TO: J. F. McLaughlin, Director December 1, 1975 Joint- Highway Research Project Project: C-36-64H FROM: H. L. Michael, Associate Director Joint Highway Research Project File: 3-5- Attached is the Final Report titled "History of the Interstate System in Indiana", authored by David A. Ripple a Graduate Instructor on our staff while conducting the research and authoring the Report. Professor W. L. Grecco, formerly of our staff, directed the study during its initial year and Professor Michael supervised it during the latter years and handled the lengthy review process. The Report has been re- viewed by several personnel of the ISHG, including Mr. Walter Frick, and changes suggested by them have generally been made and are sincerely appreciated. The History covers the period from the late 1930 's through 1972. The Interstate System was not yet complete in 1972 and the period after 1972 is not reported herein. Perhaps it will be at a later date after the System is completed. The Report is voluminous and therefore is issued in four (4) volumes as follows: Volume I - Development of the National Program (Chapters I thru IV) Volume II - Evolution of Policies and Standards (Chapter V) Volume III - Route History (Chapter VI) Volume IV - Cost, Funding and General Benefits (Chapters VII and VIII) Another volume as an Appendix which is a detailed Table titled "Interstate Highway Construction Record" is also in preparation and will be issued at a later date.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Indianapolis Division
    Case 1:06-cv-01442-DFH-TAB Document 90 Filed 12/10/2007 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, ) CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ) ROADS, SASSAFRAS AUDUBON ) SOCIETY, BRENDA BUSTER, TERRY ) BUSTER, ANDREW RUFF, EDITH SARRA, ) MARK STOOPS, SOPHIA TRAVIS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-cv-1442-DFH-TAB ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ) ADMINISTRATION, J.RICHARD CAPKA, ) as Administrator of the Federal Highway ) Administration, ROBERT F. TALLEY, JR., ) as Division Administrator of the Federal ) Highway Administration Indiana Division, ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ) INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, as ) Secretary of the United States ) Department of the Interior, UNITED ) STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, ) H. DALE HALL, as Director of the United ) States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARY E. ) PETERS, as Secretary of the United ) States Department of Transportation, ) KARL B. BROWNING, as Commissioner ) of the Indiana Department of ) Transportation, ) ) Defendants. ) ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A), plaintiffs seek judicial review of a final decision by the Federal Highway Administration and the Indiana Department of Transportation to build a new interstate highway through Case 1:06-cv-01442-DFH-TAB Document 90 Filed 12/10/2007 Page 2 of 58 southwestern Indiana from Indianapolis to Evansville along a route called Alternative 3C. Plaintiffs are the Hoosier Environmental Council and several other groups and individuals concerned about the environmental impacts expected from construction along the proposed route. They contend that the selection of Alternative 3C was arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with the procedural safeguards of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and the more substantive protections of the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Department of Transportation Act.
    [Show full text]