DOCSLIB.ORG

Burns Bog Ecosystem Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Burns Bog Ecosystem Review Synthesis Report for Burns Bog, Fraser River Delta, South-western British Columbia, Canada March 2000 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Burns Bog ecosystem review Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-4191-9 1. Bog ecology - British Columbia - Delta. I. Hebda, Richard Joseph, 1950- . II. British Columbia. Environmental Assessment Office. QH541.5.B63B87 2000 577.68'7'0971133 C00-960112-0 Suggested Reference Hebda, R.J., K. Gustavson, K. Golinski and A.M. Calder, 2000. Burns Bog Ecosystem Review Synthesis Report for Burns Bog, Fraser River Delta, South-western British Columbia, Canada. Environmental Assessment Office, Victoria, BC. i Burns Bog Ecosystem Review Synthesis Report March 2000 Prepared by: Environmental Assessment Office Province of British Columbia Written by: Richard J. Hebda Kent Gustavson Karen Golinski Alan M. Calder Document Credits The Burns Bog Ecosystem Review Synthesis Report was written by a team of scientists under the direction of the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office. Dr. Richard J. Hebda led the Review and oversaw the writing of the complete document. Dr. Kent Gustavson (Gustavson Ecological Resource Consulting), Karen Golinski and Alan M. Calder provided major contributions to the Report and reviewed the document in its entirety. Lisa Tallon was responsible for coordinating the compilation of the document. Simon Norris and Susan Westmacott assembled and constructed the maps. Shari Steinbach provided review and administrative support. Principle authorship of individual sections is as follows: 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................ Gustavson, Calder 2.0 Raised Bog Development and Hydrology ............................................................. Golinski 3.0 Study Area and Regional Context ..........................................................Hebda, Gustavson 4.0 Biophysical Characteristics of Burns Bog..............................................Hebda, Gustavson 5.0 Results of Integration Studies.................................................Hebda, Gustavson, Golinski 6.0 Analysis and Synthesis ..............................................................................................Hebda 7.0 Key Findings and Conclusions ..................................................................................Hebda ii Acknowledgements The Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) gratefully acknowledges the generous and dedicated support and advice of the agencies, organizations and individuals that supported and contributed to the Burns Bog Ecosystem Review. We wish to thank, Delta Fraser Properties Partnership (DFPP) and their consultants, particularly Jeff Herold and Glenn Stewart, for their ongoing participation in support of the review process. The kind support and co-operation of the Corporation of Delta, especially Verne Kucy and Rob Rithaler, is greatly appreciated. In addition, we thank Gregory McDade, Q.C., Advisor to the Minister of Environment, Lands and Parks, for his thoughtful advice and for facilitating the Burns Bog Ecosystem Review public involvement process. The co-operation and assistance of the Corporation of Delta, the City of Vancouver, the Greater Vancouver Regional District, the Fraser River Estuary Management Program, the Fraser River Port Authority, Environment Canada, the Canadian Wildlife Service, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the BC Ministries of Environment, Lands and Parks (MELP), Agriculture and Food, Transportation and Highways, and Small Business, Tourism and Culture, and the Royal British Columbia Museum were critical to the review and completion of the technical studies. The committed efforts of the various consultant teams who contributed to the supporting studies are also appreciated. We also thank the many scientists and experts who contributed considerable time, effort, and expertise in participating in a series of the Technical Review Meetings. Thank you for your participation, your instructive contributions during the sessions, and your willingness to provide further counsel. Thank you also for your thoughtful answers to questions from members of the public. In addition, the EAO wishes to thank the members of the public and organizations who made submissions and participated in the workshops and meetings for their efforts in the public interest. In particular we thank the Burns Bog Conservation Society for their support and participation in the review process. Finally, the EAO wishes to thank all those involved in the preparation and review of the Synthesis Report. In particular, we thank the Land Use Coordination Office for their analytical and mapping support, as well as those who kindly agreed to review key sections of the document. Burns Bog Ecosystem Review Team (EAO) Richard Hebda, Alan Calder, Lisa Tallon, Shari Steinbach, Daphne Stancil and Susan Ellis. Synthesis Report Peer Review Team Dr. Joe Antos (University of Victoria), Dr. Antoni Damman (Kansas State University), Dr. Paul Glaser (University of Minnesota), Dr. John Jeglum (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Dave Nagorsen (Royal British Columbia Museum), Dr. Geoff Scudder (University of British Columbia). Dr Eric Taylor (Atmospheric Environment Service), Dr. Pat Monahan (Monahan Petroleum Consulting), Dr. Sergei Yazvenko (LGL Limited). iii MELP Lower Mainland Regional Office staff Tony Barnard, Brian Clark, Dave Dunbar, Jack Evans, Liz Freyman, Duane Jesson, Rob Knight, Tom Plath, Marvin Rosenau, Mel Turner and Marc Zubel. Technical Review Meeting Participants Allan Banner (BC Ministry of Forests), Ken Brock (Canadian Wildlife Service), John Christy (Oregon Heritage Program/The Nature Conservancy), Brian Clark (MELP), Allan Dakin (Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd.), Dr. Antoni Damman (Kansas State University), Klaus Dierssen (University of Kiel, Germany), Dave Dunbar (MELP), Don Eastman (University of Victoria), Paul Glaser (University of Minnesota), John Jeglum (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Charlotte MacAlister (University of Newcastle), Colin Levings (Fisheries and Oceans Canada), Ian McTaggart-Cowan, Dave Nagorsen (Royal BC Museum), Hans Roemer (MELP), Richard Rothwell (University of Alberta), Geoff Scudder (University of British Columbia), Jamie Smith (University of British Columbia), Scott Smith (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Glenn Stewart (ENKON Environmental Limited), Charles Tarnocai (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Eric Taylor (Environment Canada), Terry Taylor, Dale Vitt (University of Alberta), Doyle Wells (Natural Resources Canada) and Marc Zubel (MELP). Environmental Assessment Office Sheila Wynn, Patty Shelton, Paul Finkel, Joanne McGachie, Martyn Glassman, Lynn Ostle, Janet Rogers, Margaret Achadinha, Crista Osman, Tawnya Ritco, Cheryl Weiss, Diana Elliott, Tamara Armstrong, Sharon Lacoste, Yassamin Abhar, Donna Santori and the EAO Registry staff. Consultants to the EAO Don DeMill, ENKON Information Systems, Karen Golinski and Nick Page, Kent Gustavson (Gustavson Ecological Resource Consulting), Patricia Howie and Erika Britney (Praxis Pacific), Richard Sims and Jeff Mattheson (EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.) and Sergei Yazvenko (LGL Limited). Land Use Coordination Office David Johns, Don Howes, Simon Norris, Susan Westmacott, Linda Hartley, Janet McIntosh and Judy Nicholson. Consultants supporting the Burns Bog Ecosystem Review John Lambert, Ryanne Metcalf, Larry Turchenek, Prashant Kumar and John Wiens (AGRA Earth and Environmental); Dennis Knopp and L. Larkin (BC's Wild Heritage Consultants); Oluna and Adolf Ceska; Richard Collier; Sheldon Helbert and John Balfour (EBA Engineering Consultants); Niko Zorkin and Michael McClorg (ENKON Information Systems); Martin Gebauer and Ken Summers (Enviro-Pacific Consulting), Ze'ev Gedalof (Flat Earth Neogeographics); R.G. Humphries and T. Oke (Levelton Engineering Ltd.); Jan Teversham, Ksenia Barton and Bryan Tasaka (Madrone Consultants Ltd.); McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd.; Mark Fraker, Claudio Bianchini, K. Anré McIntosh, Ian Robertson (Robertson Environmental Services); Rex Kenner and Karen Needham (Spencer Entomological Museum, UBC); Dale Vitt, Linda Halsey and Jennifer Doubt (University of Alberta); Mike Whelen (M.A. Whelen and Associates Ltd.). iv Executive Summary Burns Bog is a raised bog ecosystem covering approximately 3,000 ha of the Fraser River delta between the south arm of the Fraser River and Boundary Bay. On June 1, 1999, the Government of British Columbia and Delta Fraser Properties Partnership – the owners of 2,200 ha of land within the Bog - agreed to undertake an ecosystem review to gain a full understanding of what is needed to preserve the ecological integrity of Burns Bog. The purpose of the Burns Bog Ecosystem Review (the Review) was to determine the factors crucial to preserving Burns Bog as a viable ecosystem, such as the hydrology, geology, flora and fauna. The BC Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) was charged with managing the review process. The public and stakeholders contributed to developing the nature and scope of the studies undertaken. Gregory McDade, Q.C., Advisor to the Minister of Environment, Lands and Parks, facilitated public involvement throughout the review process. The public participated in reviewing study progress, and in Technical Review Meetings involving local, regional and international scientific experts. All project materials were accessible through the EAO Project Registry,
Recommended publications
  • Riparian Vegetation Management

    Riparian Vegetation Management

    Engineering in the Water Environment Good Practice Guide Riparian Vegetation Management Second edition, June 2009 Your comments SEPA is committed to ensuring its Good Practice Guides are useful and relevant to those carrying out activities in Scotland’s water environment. We welcome your comments on this Good Practice Guide so that we can improve future editions. A feedback form and details on how to send your comments to us can be found at the back of this guide in Appendix 1. Acknowledgements This document was produced in association with Northern Ecological Services (NES). Page 1 of 47 Engineering in the Water Environment Good Practice Guide: Riparian Vegetation Management Second edition, June 2009 (Document reference: WAT-SG-44) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 What’s included in this Guide? 3 2 Importance of riparian vegetation 6 3 Establishing/creating vegetation 8 3.1 Soft or green engineering techniques 8 3.2 Seeding and planting of bare soil 10 3.3 Creating buffer strips 11 3.4 Planting trees and shrubs 15 3.5 Marginal vegetation 18 3.6 Urban watercourses 21 4 Managing vegetation 24 4.1 Management of grasses and herbs 24 4.2 Management of heath and bog 27 4.3 Management of adjacent wetlands 28 4.4 Management of non-native plant species 29 4.5 Management of scrub and hedgerows 31 4.6 Management of individual trees 31 4.7 Management of trees – riparian woodland 33 4.8 Management of trees – conifer plantations 35 4.9 Large woody debris 37 4.10 Marginal vegetation 37 4.11 Urban watercourses 40 4.12 Use of herbicides 40 4.13 Environmental management of vegetation 41 4.14 Vegetation management plans 41 5 Sources of further information 42 5.1 Publications 42 5.2 Websites 44 Appendix 1: Feedback form – Good Practice Guide WAT-SG-44 45 Page 2 of 47 1 Introduction This document is one of a series of good practice guides produced by SEPA to help people involved in the selection of sustainable engineering solutions that minimise harm to the water environment.
  • A Unique Raised Bog at Urbana, Ohio.*

    A Unique Raised Bog at Urbana, Ohio.*

    A UNIQUE RAISED BOG AT URBANA, OHIO.* ROBERT B. GORDON, Ohio State University. Located just north of the Champaign County Fair Grounds at Urbana, Ohio, is a unique dome-shaped bog, covered with shrubby vegetation for the most part, in which the center is raised at least ten feet above the margins. An old road crosses the bog. I have been told that it was once the main thorofare from Urbana to Columbus. Horses and wagons passed over it, I suppose, the drivers never realizing that a mat of fibrous roots less than one foot thick was all that held them over a body of water twelve feet in depth. Raised bogs, called "high moors" and "Hochmoore" in foreign literature, have long been known throughout Europe. N. S. Shaler is credited by Nichols with being the first to call attention to these peculiar swamps in North America, in 1888-89. Those which Shaler observed were "mostly limited to the eastern portion of Maine, near the shores of the Bay of Fundy," but some of lesser magnitude were reported for New Hampshire, northern Michigan, and Minnesota. Similar bogs, with centers about 13 feet above their margins, have been reported in the province of New Brunswick by Ganong (1897). Nichols (1919) described bogs of this type encountered in Maine, in which the elevation of the center above the margin varied from 2 or 3 feet to as high as 18 feet (e. g., Denbo Heath, covering several square miles in area). He asserts: "(1) that in the state of Maine raised bogs, in so far as they constitute a distinctive swamp type, are virtually restricted to the proximity of the seacoast; and (2) that in other portions of New England and of the eastern United States this type of bog is practically absent, although in occasional swamps it is possible to detect a slight elevation of the surface above the level of permanent ground water." Warming (1909) has summarized concisely the characteristic features of "Hochmoore." They owe their development to the growth of sphagnum mosses which absorb water that falls in the form of rain or snow.
  • National Water Summary Wetland Resources: Maine

    National Water Summary Wetland Resources: Maine

    National Water Summary-Wetland Resources 213 Maine Wetland Resources M aine is rich in wetland resources. About 5 million acres, or one­ System Wetland description fourth of the State, is wetland. Maine has a wide variety of wetlands, Palustrine .................. Nontidal and tidal-freshwater wetlands in which ranging from immense inland peatlands to salt marshes and mud vegetation is predominantly trees (forested wet­ flats along the coast. lands); shrubs (scrub-shrub wetlands); persistent Wetlands are an integral part of Maine's natural resources. or nonpersistent emergent, erect, rooted herba­ ceous plants (persistent- and nonpersistent­ Wetlands provide essential habitat for certain types of wildlife and emergent wetlands); or submersed and (or) vegetation, including rare and endangered species. They are used floating plants (aquatic beds). Also, intermit­ for timber and peat; hunting, fishing, and shellfishing; education tently to permanently flooded open-water bod­ and research; and bird, wildlife and plant observation, all of which ies of less than 20 acres in which water is less than 6.6 feet deep. boost tourism and the general economy. Wetlands also provide flood control, bank and shoreline-erosion control, sediment retention, lacustrine ................. Nontidal and tidal-freshwater wetlands within an intermittently to permanently flooded lake or water fi ltration, and nutrient uptake. In recognition of the impor­ reservoir larger than 20 acres and (or) deeper tance of wetlands, many government and private organizations have than 6.6 feet. Vegetation, when present, is pre­ worked to preserve wetlands and educate the public about wetland dominantly nonpersistent emergent plants (non­ values. For example, the Maine Department of Conservation owns persistent-emergent wetlands), or submersed and (or) floating plants (aquatic beds), or both.
  • Newsletter of the Entomological Society of British Columbia

    Newsletter of the Entomological Society of British Columbia

    Boreus Newsletter of the Entomological Society of British Columbia December 2006 Volume 26 (2) Table of Contents The Executive................................................2 Publications of the ESBC ........................3 Boreus Editor’s Notes.......................................5 Society Business .............................................6 Executive Reports ......................................... 11 Editor’s Report – Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia. 11 Web Editor’s Report ........................... 12 Report of the ESBC Regional Director....... 13 Boreus Report................................... 16 2006 AGM and Aquatic Entomology Symposium ...... 16 Upcoming Events .......................................... 21 New and Upcoming Publications........................ 24 Notes from the Field: Bute Inlet trip yielded a few new records ................................................ 27 Interesting Entomological Information ................ 28 Notes and News............................................ 28 ESC Gold Metal Awarded to Richard Ring .. 29 Entomological Humour ........................ 32 Requests for information on the Monarch Butterfly in Canada ............................ 33 In Memory, John Douglas “Jack” Gregson.. 34 In Memory, Dr. Albert "Bert" Turnbull ...... 36 Top to bottom photographs: Spotted Lake outside Osoyoos; Rob Cannings looking for the elusive Tanypteryx hageni at Herman Lake, Terrace; day of collecting at White Lake, near Penticton; dragonfly at Nighthawk Ecoreserve near Keremeos
  • Nneef~)\I^ Petition to Protect Unprotecte.D Bums Bog

    Nneef~)\I^ Petition to Protect Unprotecte.D Bums Bog

    genda PETITIONS TO PROTECT UNPROTECTED BURNS BOG SUBMITTED ON JUNE 20, 2016 BY ELIZA OLSON FOR THE BURNS BOG CONSERVATION SOCIETY 41 SIGNATURE HARD COPY PETITION 132 ADDITIONAL SIGNATURE ON-LINE PETITION (Please Note: Includes the 153 Signature On-Line Previously Submitted On June 8, 2016) ONTABLE E. 03 DEPT: Comments: nneef~)\i^ Petition to Protect Unprotecte.d Bums Bog To the Honorable, the Council of the Corporation of Delta in the Province of British Columbia in 9.Ol111Cil Assembled The petition of the undersigned; residents of the Province of British Columbia, states that; Whereas: A business con~ortium led by develop~rs are attempting to convert unprotected areas of Burns Bog into commercial, industrial and residential developments; and (:.,." Whereas: the peatland is part of the largest raised peat bog on the west coast of North America; and , !i, Whereas: former Premier Campbell attempted to buy this unprotected peatland as a buffer zone in 2004; and ~ ::0 Whereas: these peatlands are critical to the long term survival of the Burns Bog Conservation Area; and . .0 w Whereas: these peatlands, along with the Burns Bog Conservation Area are critical to the ecosystem that supp~ • '_ . " , ' . , - 1..... 1 the Pacific flyway, the largest salmon-bearing river in the world, the Fraser River; and Whereas: Canada has signed a number of international agreements, including the Ramsar Convention that . • ~ ! recognizes Burns Bog as a wetland of international importance and the Migratory Bird Co~vention Act; Your petitioners requ~st that the Honourable Council demand that the Corporation of Delta of British Columbia publicly condemn the proposed industrialization of peatland that is part of the largest raised peatland on the west coast of North America and declare its commitment to protect all of Burns Bog peatland.
  • This Document Was Withdrawn on 6 November 2017

    This Document Was Withdrawn on 6 November 2017

    2017. November 6 on understanding withdrawn was water for wildlife document This Water resources and conservation: the eco-hydrological requirements of habitats and species Assessing We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your 2017. environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are makingNovember your environment cleaner and healthier. 6 The Environment Agency. Out there, makingon your environment a better place. withdrawn was Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 0870document 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk This© Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. April 2007 Contents Brief summary 1. Introduction 2017. 2. Species and habitats 2.2.1 Coastal and halophytic habitats 2.2.2 Freshwater habitats 2.2.3 Temperate heath, scrub and grasslands 2.2.4 Raised bogs, fens, mires, alluvial forests and bog woodland November 2.3.1 Invertebrates 6 2.3.2 Fish and amphibians 2.3.3 Mammals on 2.3.4 Plants 2.3.5 Birds 3. Hydro-ecological domains and hydrological regimes 4 Assessment methods withdrawn 5. Case studies was 6. References 7. Glossary of abbreviations document This Environment Agency in partnership with Natural England and Countryside Council for Wales Understanding water for wildlife Contents Brief summary The Restoring Sustainable Abstraction (RSA) Programme was set up by the Environment Agency in 1999 to identify and catalogue2017.
  • 2007 Annual Report for the City of Richmond

    2007 Annual Report for the City of Richmond

    Cullen Commission City of Richmond Records Page 298 -·... ,. �......... -· 2007 Annual Report Ci1y or llich111011d. lhiti�li Col11111hi:1. C.111:1d:1 For the year ended December 31, 2007 Cullen Commission City of Richmond Records Page 299 City of Richmond's Vision: To be the most appealing, livable, and well-managed community in Canada Cityof Richmond British Collllllbia, Canada 2007 Annual Report For the year ended December 31, 2007 Cullen Commission City of Richmond Records Page 300 Cover Photo: Rowers have become a familiar sight along the Fraser River's Middle Arm with the opening of UBC's JohnMS Lecky Boathouse, offering both competitive and community rowing and paddling sports programs. This report was prepared by the City of Richmond Business and Financial Services and Corporate Services Departments. Design, layout and production by the City of Richmond Production Centre C '2007 City of Richmond Cullen Commission City of Richmond Records Page 301 Table of Contents Introductory Section ......................................................................................................................... i Message from the Mayor .......................................................................................................................... ii Richmond City Council ........................................................................................................................... iii City of Richmond Organizational Chart ..................................................................................................
  • Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska

    Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska

    Zootaxa 4666 (1): 001–180 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4666.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA01E30E-7F64-49AB-910A-7EE6E597A4A4 ZOOTAXA 4666 Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER1,3 & ZOË LINDO1 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A0C6, Canada. 2Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by T. Pfingstl: 26 Jul. 2019; published: 6 Sept. 2019 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER & ZOË LINDO Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska (Zootaxa 4666) 180 pp.; 30 cm. 6 Sept. 2019 ISBN 978-1-77670-761-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-762-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2019 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press BEHAN-PELLETIER & LINDO Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................5
  • Burns Bog Ecological Conservancy Area Management Plan May 2007

    Burns Bog Ecological Conservancy Area Management Plan May 2007

    Burns Bog Ecological Conservancy Area Management Plan May 2007 BURNS BOG ECOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Public Acquisition and Management of Lands........................................... 1 1.2 Planning Process....................................................................................... 2 2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Formation of Burns Bog............................................................................. 3 2.2 Significance of Burns Bog ......................................................................... 4 2.3 Cultural History .......................................................................................... 4 2.4 Recent Bog History.................................................................................... 5 3.0 MANAGEMENT CONTEXT .................................................................................. 5 4.0 THE BOG LANDS AND THE GVRD .................................................................... 7 5.0 VISION AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................. 7 5.1 Vision – 100 Year Timeframe .................................................................... 7 5.2 Mission ...................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Management
  • Lowland Raised Bog (UK BAP Priority Habitat Description)

    Lowland Raised Bog (UK BAP Priority Habitat Description)

    UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitat Descriptions Lowland Raised Bog From: UK Biodiversity Action Plan; Priority Habitat Descriptions. BRIG (ed. Ant Maddock) 2008. This document is available from: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5706 For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5155 Please note: this document was uploaded in November 2016, and replaces an earlier version, in order to correct a broken web-link. No other changes have been made. The earlier version can be viewed and downloaded from The National Archives: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150302161254/http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page- 5706 Lowland Raised Bog The definition of this habitat remains unchanged from the pre-existing Habitat Action Plan (https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110303150026/http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPl ans.aspx?ID=20, a summary of which appears below. Lowland raised bogs are peatland ecosystems which develop primarily, but not exclusively, in lowland areas such as the head of estuaries, along river flood-plains and in topographic depressions. In such locations drainage may be impeded by a high groundwater table, or by low permeability substrata such as estuarine, glacial or lacustrine clays. The resultant waterlogging provides anaerobic conditions which slow down the decomposition of plant material which in turn leads to an accumulation of peat. Continued accrual of peat elevates the bog surface above regional groundwater levels to form a gently-curving dome from which the term ‘raised’ bog is derived. The thickness of the peat mantle varies considerably but can exceed 12m.
  • Lowland Raised Bog, Duddon Mosses NNR, Cumbria

    Lowland Raised Bog, Duddon Mosses NNR, Cumbria

    Lowland raised bog, Duddon Mosses NNR, Cumbria. © Natural England/Jacqueline Ogden 17. Lowland raised bog Climate Change Sensitivity: Medium Climate Change Adaptation Manual Evidence to support nature conservation in a changing climate 159 Introduction An intact, fully functioning lowland raised bog is expected to be relatively resilient to projected climate change, although both changes to patterns of rainfall, including extreme events and summer warming, will place increasing pressure on the habitat. In England, however, there are no raised bogs in this condition. The impact of historic and current land management has a significant impact on the vulnerability of sites. Damage through peat cutting or drainage (both on and off-site) that alters the hydrology of sites has significant adverse impacts on the ability of the bog to withstand reduced rainfall and extreme events such as drought. Degraded bogs are also more vulnerable to climate change impacts on the quality and quantity of ground water. In England, most remaining lowland raised bog habitat is found on the central or core area of the original dome. Surrounding this is an area of degraded peatland, often now under alternative land use, making the remaining bog increasingly vulnerable to off-site impacts and land-use change. Habitat Description Lowland raised bogs are peatland ecosystems which develop primarily in lowland areas such as at the head of estuaries, along river flood-plains and in topographic depressions. In such locations drainage has been impeded by a high groundwater table or by low permeability of the substrata. The resultant water-logging provides anaerobic conditions which slow down the decomposition of plant material, which in turn leads to an accumulation of peat.
  • Appendix I Climate Normals

    Appendix I Climate Normals

    84 APPENDIX I CLIMATE NORMALS 85 APPENDIX I: CLIMATE NORMALS (1951 - 1980) NANAIMO AIRPORT (49 Degrees 3 Minutes North / 123 Degrees 52 Feet Minutes TOTAL BRIGHT SUNSHINE (HOURS) 1951-81 JANUARY 50.3 FEBRUARY 78.7 MARCH 125.9 APRIL 166.3 MAY 231.7 JUNE 218.6 JULY 287.4 AUGUST 244.6 SEPTEMBER 177.1 OCTOBER 122.0 NOVEMBER 65.1 DECEMBER 43.4 YEAR 1,811.1 86 87 88 FROST AVERAGES AND EXTREMES: NANAIMO AIRPORT AVERAGES BASED ON 1951 - 1980 PERIOD OF RECORD YEARS: 30 Frost-free Period (days): 155 Last Frost (Spring): May 3rd First Frost (Fall): October 6th EXTREMES BASED ON FULL PERIOD OF RECORD YEARS: 34 LAST FROST (SPRING) Earliest: April 9th Latest: May 31st FIRST FROST (FALL) Earliest: September 12th Latest: November 20th LONGEST Last Frost (Spring): April 20th First Frost (Fall): November 20th Number of Days: 213 SHORTEST Last Frost (Spring): May 16th First Frost (Fall): September 12th Number of Days: 118 89 APPENDIX II: CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FOR CLIMATIC SUITABILITY FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION 90 APPENDIX II: CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FOR CLIMATIC SUITABILITY FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION IN B.C., R. C. BENNETT (1977) Outdoor recreation involves a complex interaction between people and the physical environment. Since weather is a key determiner of personal comfort, climate is an important consideration in the assessment of outdoor recreation suitability. Personal comfort levels are difficult to establish and require the assessment of numerous variables. However, reliable classification schemes have been developed. Personal comfort variables include ambient air temperature, wind, relative humidity, solar radiation, as well as activity levels and clothing.