DOCSLIB.ORG

Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 4, 2013 Mr. Michael D. Skaggs Mr. Joseph W. Shea Senior Vice President Vice President, Nuclear licensing Nuclear Construction Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C Lookout Place 6A Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 SUBJECT: BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1,2, AND 3; SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; AND WATIS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 ­ REASSIGNMENT OF BRANCH CHIEF FOR PLANT LICENSING BRANCH 11-2 Dear Mr. Skaggs and Mr. Shea: This letter is to inform you that effective December 16,2012, Mr. Jessie F. Quichocho was assigned as the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Chief for Plant Licensing Branch 11-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Mr. Quichocho assumes all licensing oversight and supervisory duties previously performed by Mr. Douglas A. Broaddus regarding the following Tennessee Valley Authority plants: Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. Mr. Quichocho may be reached at 301-415-0209 or via e-mail to [email protected]. Sincerely, John D. Monninger, Deputy Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, 50-296, 50-327,50-328, 50-390,50-391, 50-438, and 50-439 cc: See next page Additional Distribution via Listserv Letter to M. Skaggs and J. Shea from J. Monninger dated January 4, 2013 SUBJECT: REASSIGNMENT OF BRANCH CHIEF FOR PLANT LICENSING BRANCH 11-2 cc: Tennessee Valley Authority Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Mr. K. D. Stinson Mr. A. J. Simonti Vice President, Bellefonte Project General Manager, Bellefonte Technical Tennessee Valley Authority Services 2744 Bellefonte Road, OSB-1A Tennessee Valley Authority Hollywood, Alabama 35752 2744 Bellefonte Road, OSB-1A Hollywood, Alabama 35752 Mr. M. C. Bryan Manager (Acting), Licensing State Health Officer Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Alabama Dept. of Public Health Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 303017 2744 Bellefonte Road, OSB-1A Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Hollywood, Alabama 35752 Chairman Mr. P. D. Swafford Jackson County Commission Chief Nuclear Officer and Courthouse Executive Vice President Scottsboro, AL 35752-0200 Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street Director Lookout Place 3R Alabama Emergency Management Agency Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 P.O. Drawer 2160 Clanton, AL 35045-5160 Mr. D. C. Romashko Senior Manager, Quality Assurance Tennessee Valley Authority Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 2744 Bellefonte Road, OSB-1A Hollywood, Alabama 35752 Mr. E. J. Vigluicci Assistant General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive West Tower 6A Knoxville, TN 37902 January 4, 2013 Mr. Michael D. Skaggs Mr. Joseph W. Shea Senior Vice President Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Nuclear Construction Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C Lookout Place 6A Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 SUBJECT: BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3; SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; AND WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2­ REASSIGNIVIENT OF BRANCH CHIEF FOR PLANT LICENSING BRANCH 11-2 Dear Mr. Skaggs and Mr. Shea: This letter is to inform you that effective December 16,2012, Mr. Jessie F. Quichocho was assigned as the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Chief for Plant Licensing Branch 11-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Mr. Quichocho assumes all licensing oversight and supervisory duties previously performed by Mr. Douglas A. Broaddus regarding the following Tennessee Valley Authority plants: Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. Mr. Quichocho may be reached at 301-415-0209 or via e-mail to [email protected]. Sincerely, IRA! John D. Monninger, Deputy Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, 50-296, 50-327,50-328, 50-390, 50-391, 50-438, and 50-439 cc: See next page Additional Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC RidsDortLpl2-2 Resource RidsNrrPMSequoyah Resou rce LPL2-2 r/f RidsNrrLABClayton Resource RidsNrrPMBeltefonte1 and2 Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsOgcRp Resource SMeighan. NRR RidsNrrPMBrownsFerry Resource RidsRegion2MailCenter Resource FKeith. NRR RidsNrrOd Resource RidsNrrPMWattsBar1 Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource RidsNrrPMWattsBar2 Resource ADAMS Accession No'.. ML 12348A571 OFFICE NRRlLPL2-2/PM NRRlLP2-2/LA(IT) NRRlLP2-2/LA NRRlLP2-2/BC NRRlDORUDD NAME JPoole FKeith BClayton AHon for JQuichocho JMonninger DATE 1/2/13 12127/12 12/28/12 112/13 1/4/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • TVA's Bad Nuclear
    TVA’s Bad Nuclear Bet: Gambling BILLIONS on Bellefonte Reactors Prepared by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy August 2011 Executive Summary “The circumstances for Bellefonte Units 1 and 2 are unique; no other licensee has ever given up its construction permits, partially dismantled the plant and allowed the facility to degrade, then requested that the permits be reissued.” -Joseph F. Williams, NRC Senior Project Manager1 The history of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) Bellefonte site in Jackson County, Alabama spans nearly 40 years. A total of four reactors have been proposed, and billions of dollars have been spent, but not a single kilowatt of electricity has ever been produced. After allowing the site to sit idle for more than 20 years and scrapping the facility for spare parts, TVA is now proposing to restart construction of the Bellefonte Unit 1 reactor, which may be one of the greatest gambles in the agency’s history. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy has serious concerns about TVA’s push to complete the mothballed, abandoned Bellefonte reactors. Bellefonte’s unique and complicated history is compounded by that fact that, in order to complete construction of the reactors, TVA faces unique and complicated problems—many worse than any other reactor project has previously faced. This report documents some of our concerns and makes it clear that finishing Bellefonte is not a gamble worth taking. Our concerns include Bellefonte's long, complicated history; multiple safety concerns that have not been addressed; the troubled history of the Babcock &Wilcox “Mark-C 205” design; the unnecessary and costly nature of Bellefonte; and additional obstacles.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 195/Friday, October 7, 2011/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Notices 62457 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal meeting to arrange for a visitor’s badge NUCLEAR REGULATORY for the following collection of and obtain the room number. Call 703– COMMISSION information: 292–7000 to request your badge, which [NRC–2009–0093; Docket No. 50–438] OMB Number: 3133–0004. will be ready for pick-up at the visitor’s Form Number: NCUA 5300. desk on the day of the meeting. All Tennessee Valley Authority (Bellefonte Type of Review: Revision to the visitors must report to the NSF visitor Nuclear Plant, Unit 1) currently approved collection. desk at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets Title: Quarterly Call Report. entrance to receive their visitor’s badge Order Description: The financial and on the day of the teleconference. I. statistical information is essential to Please refer to the National Science NCUA in carrying out its responsibility Board Web site (http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/ The Tennessee Valley Authority for the supervision of federally insured notices/) for information or schedule (TVA, or the applicant) is the current credit unions. The information also updates, or contact: Jennie Moehlmann, holder of Construction Permit (CP) Nos. enables NCUA to monitor all federally National Science Foundation, CPPR–122 and CPPR–123, which were insured credit unions whose share 4201Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. issued by the Atomic Energy accounts are insured by the National Telephone: (703) 292–7000. Commission (now the U.S. Nuclear Credit Union Share Insurance Fund Regulatory Commission (NRC)) on Suzanne Plimpton, (NCUSIF). December 24, 1974 (Agencywide Respondents: All Credit Unions.
    [Show full text]
  • Provides Specific Plans for Responding
    . REGULATURY 9 FORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYA M (RIDS) ACCESSION NbR:8501020238 DOCDATE: 84/12/14 NOTARIZED; NO DOCKET # FACTL:50-000 Generic Docket 05000000 50-269 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Duke Power Co. 05000269 50-329 Midland Plant, Unit 1, Consumers Power Co, 05000329 50-330 Midland Plant, Unit 2, Consumers Power Co. 05000330 50-346 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Toledo Edi 05000346 50-302 Crystal River Nuclear Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power Co 05000302 50-313 Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, Arkansas Power & Light 05000313 50-270 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Duke Power Co. 05000270 50-287 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Duke Power Co. 05000287 50-289 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Metropolit 05000289 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station, Sacramento Mu 05000312 50-438 Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Tennessee Valley Au 05000438 50-439 Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Tennessee Valley Au 05000439 .50-460 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 1, Washington Public Powe 05000460 AUTH,NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION HOSLER,A,G, Babcock & Wilcox Operating Plants Owners Group RECIP,NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION KADAMBIN,P, NRC - No Detailed Affiliation Given SUBJECT: Provides specific plans for responding to Generic Ltr 81-21 re natural circulation cooldown,per 841114 meeting.Specific plant responses to generic Itr expected by 850201. DISTRIBUTION CODE: G006D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 1.. ENCL 6- SIZE;....J.... TITLE: Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) Owners Group Correspondence NOTES:AEOD/Ornstein:1cy, 05000269 OL:02/06/73 AEOD/Ornstein:1cy. 05000346 OL:04/22/77 AEOD/Ornstein:lcy. 05000302 OL12/02/76 AEOD/Ornstein:1cy, 05000313 0L;05/21/74 AEU0/Ornstein:1cy, 05000270 OL:10/06/73 AEOD/Ornstein:lcy.
    [Show full text]
  • Oconee Nuclear Station, Units No. 1, 2, and 3 Docket No
    Steven M. Snider Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy ON01VP | 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 o: 864.873.3478 f: 864.873.5791 Steve.Snider @duke-energy.com Serial: RA-19-0418 10 CFR 50.55a May 6, 2021 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS NO. 1, 2, AND 3 DOCKET NO. 50-269, 270, AND 50-287 RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-38, DPR-47 AND DPR-55 SUBJECT: Proposed Alternative for Inservice Inspection of Containment Post- Tensioning System Components Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1), Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) requests the NRC to grant relief from Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Units 1, 2, and 3. Specifically, Duke Energy is proposing a modification to the scope and schedule currently required by ASME Code requirement IWL-2421(b) for post-tensioning system examinations. Relief is being sought on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. The Relief Request is provided as Enclosure 1 to this letter. If you have questions concerning this request, please contact Art Zaremba, Director - Fleet Licensing, at (980) 373-2062. Sincerely, Steve M Snider. Site Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Enclosure: 1. Relief Request RA-19-0418 cc : L. Dudes, Regional Administrator USNRC Region II J. Nadel, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector – ONS S. Williams, NRR Senior Project Manager – ONS Enclosure 1 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Relief Request RA-19-0418 (6 pages including cover) 10 CFR 50.55a Relief Request RA-19-0418 Enclosure 1 Page 1 of 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risks of Reviving TVA's Bellefonte Project Report Prepared
    The Risks of Reviving TVA's Bellefonte Project Report Prepared for Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) Fairewinds Associates, Inc Arnie Gundersen, Chief Engineer August 3, 2011 Table of Contents Introduction and Background....................................................................................3 Bellefonte’s Unique Design.........................................................................................3 Quality Assurance (QA) Breakdown..........................................................................9 Cannibalization ........................................................................................................12 Containment Issues...................................................................................................14 Historical Precedent .................................................................................................20 Post Fukushima Lessons Learned ............................................................................22 Conclusion ................................................................................................................22 Attachments..............................................................................................................24 Page 2 of 24 Introduction and Background The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has requested permission from the NRC to complete construction and begin operation of the previously terminated TVA Bellefonte Nuclear Unit 1 located in Hollywood, Alabama. At this point in time, TVA believes it may be
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By KUHIKA GUPTA Norman, Oklahoma 2013 ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ______________________________ Dr. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Carol L. Silva, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Christopher M. Weible ______________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ______________________________ Dr. Jill A. Irvine © Copyright by KUHIKA GUPTA 2013 All Rights Reserved. Dedication For my incredible parents, Anil and Alpana Gupta, for making all of this possible, and my husband, Joseph T. Ripberger, for being a constant inspiration. Acknowledgements This dissertation would not be possible were it not for the invaluable support I have received throughout my journey as an undergraduate at Delhi University in India, a graduate student at the University of Warwick in England, and my pursuit of a doctorate at the University of Oklahoma in the United States. During my time at Delhi University, Ramu Manivannan was an amazing mentor who taught me the value of making a difference in both academia and the real world. My greatest debt is to Hank Jenkins-Smith and Carol Silva at the University of Oklahoma, whose encouragement, guidance, and intellectual advice has made this journey possible. I am deeply grateful for their unending support; this dissertation would not exist without them.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Docket Nos
    Shif et T XA04N2075 NUREG-001 U. S. Nuclear Evnedipation Iteport Regulatory Commission related to operation of Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Docket Nos. 50-327 Units and 2 50-328 INIS-XA-N--183 March 1979 Tennessee Valley Authority Available from National Technical Information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Price: Printed Cpy$11.75 ; Microfiche 3.00 The price of this document for requesters outside of the North American Continent can be obtained from the National Technical Information Service. NUREG-0011 March 1979 SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PLANT .................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................. 1-1 1.2 General Plant Description ................................................. 1-2 1.3 Comparison with Similar Facility Designs .................................. 1-3 1.4 Identification of Agents and Contractors .................................. 1-4 1.5 Summary of Principal Review Matters ....................................... 1-4 1.6 Outstanding Issues ........................................................ 1-5 1.7 Confirmatory Issues ....................................................... 1-6 1.8 Staff Positions - Licensing Conditions .................................... 1-9 1.9 Generic
    [Show full text]
  • Apri 1 8, 2015
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Apri 1 8, 2015 AllPowerReaciorLicenseesand Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status Dear Sir or Madam: By letter dated March 12, 2011, as supplemented on April 14, 2011, April 16, 2011, and May 25, 2011, Mr. Thomas Saporito submitted a petition pursuant to Section 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) regulations with respect to all nuclear power reactors in the U.S. located on or near an earthquake fault line. The petition has been reviewed by the NRC staff and the staff's proposed director's decision on the petition is enclosed. I request that you provide comments to me on any portions of the decision that you believe involve errors or any issues in the petition that you believe have not been fully addressed. The staff is making a similar request of the petitioner. The NRC staff will then review any comments provided by you and the petitioner and consider them in the final version of the director's decision with no further opportunity to comment. Please provide your comments within two weeks from the date of this letter. The petition manager, Mahesh Chawla, can be reached at 301-415-8371 or at [email protected]. Sincerely, A. Louise Lund, Acting Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. See Enclosure 2 Enclosures: 1. Proposed Director's Decision 2. List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status cc: Listserv ENCLOSURE 1 Proposed Director's Decision ADAMS Accession No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-13-493, Nuclear Reactor License Renewal: Nrc
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters May 2013 NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL NRC Generally Follows Documented Procedures, but Its Revisions to Environmental Review Guidance Have Not Been Timely GAO-13-493 May 2013 NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL NRC Generally Follows Documented Procedures, but Its Revisions to Environmental Review Guidance Have Not Been Timely Highlights of GAO-13-493, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Many U.S. commercial nuclear power The scope of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) license renewal reactors are reaching the end of their process focuses on managing the effects of aging on a reactor and its associated initial 40-year operating period. To systems, structures, and components (i.e. safety) and assessing certain potential continue operating, their owners must environmental impacts of extending a reactor’s operating-life. As a result, reviews renew their licenses with NRC, the done as part of this process are not required to address as many topics as independent federal agency reviews for initial licensing, which include security and emergency planning. responsible for licensing and regulating nuclear reactors. NRC evaluates NRC has regularly updated the safety review guidance it uses in the license license renewal applications under two renewal process but has not revised most of its environmental review regulations parallel reviews for safety and potential and guidance since they were first issued. NRC has revised its safety review environmental impacts. NRC’s license guidance twice—in 2005 and 2010—and has issued interim updates for selected renewal process has received safety issues between those revisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mailing List of U.S. Domestic Nuclear Utilities
    Mailing List of Domestic Nuclear Utilities ",Plant .. I Address Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 Vice President, Operations Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. 1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 & 2 Eric A. Larson Beaver Valley Power Station P. O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 & 3 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Units 1 & 2 George T. Hamrick, Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 Byron Station, Units 1 & 2/Braidwood Station, Michael J. Pacilio Units 1 & 2 Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon -Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Mr. Adam C. Heflin Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company Ameren Missouri P.O. Box 620 -Fulton, MO 65251 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Mr. George H. Gellrich, Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657-4702 Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2 Mr. Kelvin Henderson Site Vice President Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 All -2- Plant Address Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Rd. Warrenville, IL 60555 Columbia Generating Station Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 97/Tuesday, May 19, 2020/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 19, 2020 / Notices 29981 and all information needed to apply are Date and Time: September 21, 2018; issue and make immediately effective available at the Grants.gov website, 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. any amendment to an operating license https://www.grants.gov/. September 22, 2018, 9:00 a.m.–12:00 or combined license, as applicable, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: p.m. upon a determination by the Questions regarding the funding Place: National Science Foundation, Commission that such amendment opportunity announcements should be 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, involves no significant hazards emailed to Donna Robertson, Harwood VA 22314, Room C9080 (Zoom consideration, notwithstanding the Grants Coordinator, at HarwoodGrants@ Videoconference). pendency before the Commission of a dol.gov or by telephone at 847–725– Type of Meeting: Open. request for a hearing from any person. 7805. Personnel will not be available to Attendance information for the This biweekly notice includes all answer questions after 5:00 p.m., ET. To meeting will be forthcoming on the amendments issued, or proposed to be obtain further information on the Susan website: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/ issued, from April 21, 2020, to May 4, Harwood Training Grant Program, visit aaac.jsp. 2020. The last biweekly notice was the OSHA website at https:// Contact Person: Dr. Christopher published on May 5, 2020. www.osha.gov/harwoodgrants. Davis, Program Director, Division of DATES: Comments must be filed by June Questions regarding Grants.gov should Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9136, 18, 2020. A request for a hearing or be emailed to [email protected] or National Science Foundation, 2415 petitions for leave to intervene must be directed to Applicant Support toll free Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA filed by July 20, 2020.
    [Show full text]