DOCSLIB.ORG

Private Capital Performance Update: Q2 2017 Private Capital Performance Update: Q2 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRIVATE CAPITAL PERFORMANCE UPDATE: Q2 2017 PRIVATE CAPITAL PERFORMANCE UPDATE: Q2 2017 Fig. 1: Private Capital Horizon IRRs (As at 30 June 2017) Fig. 2: Private Capital Rolling One-Year Horizon IRRs 25% 30% Private Capital 25% 20% Buyout 20% Private Capital Venture Capital 15% 15% Buyout 10% Fund of Funds 5% Venture Capital 10% Mezzanine One-Year Horizon IRR 0% Annualized Return Distressed Private -5% 5% Equity Private Equity 0% 1 Year to 3 Years to 5 Years to 10 Years to Jun-17 Jun-17 Jun-17 Jun-17 Year1 Jun-13to Year1 Jun-14 to 1 Year Jun-15 to Year1 Jun-16to Year1 Jun-17 to 1 Year Sep-13 to Year1 Sep-14to Year1 Sep-15 to 1 Year Sep-16 to 1 Year1 Dec-13to Year1 Dec-14 to Year1 Dec-15to Year1 Dec-16to 1 Year1 Mar-13 to Year1 Mar-14to Year1 Mar-15to Year1 Mar-16 to Year1 Mar-17to Source: Preqin Source: Preqin Fig. 3: Private Capital Rolling Three-Year Horizon IRRs Fig. 4: Buyout Fund Horizon IRRs by Size* (As at 30 June 2017) 20% 25% 18% 16% 20% 14% Private Capital Mega Buyout 12% 10% Buyout 15% Large Buyout 8% 6% Venture Capital Mid Buyout 4% 10% Three-Year Horizon IRR 2% Annualized Return 0% Small Buyout 5% 0% 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 3 Years to Jun-13 3 Years to Jun-14 3 Years to Jun-15 3 Years to Jun-16 3 Years to Jun-17 3 Years to Sep-13 3 Years to Sep-14 3 Years to Sep-15 3 Years to Sep-16 3 3 Years to Dec-13 3 Years to Dec-14 3 Years to Dec-15 3 Years to Dec-16 3 Years to Mar-13 3 Years to Mar-14 3 Years to Mar-15 3 Years to Mar-16 3 Years to Mar-17 to Jun-17 to Jun-17 to Jun-17 Source: Preqin Source: Preqin Fig. 5: Private Capital Horizon IRRs by Fund Primary Geographic Focus (As at 30 June 2017) DATA SOURCE 25% Preqin’s online platform is the industry’s most extensive source of net-to-LP private capital fund performance, with 20% full metrics for over 8,900 named vehicles. North America 15% For more information, or to arrange a demonstration, please visit: Europe 10% www.preqin.com/privateequity Asia Annualized Return 5% *Size ranges: Vintage 1992-1996: Small Buyout ≤ $200mn, Mid Buyout $201mn-$500mn, Large 0% Buyout > $500mn 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Vintage 1997-2004: Small Buyout ≤ $300mn, Mid Buyout $301mn-$750mn, Large to Jun-17 to Jun-17 to Jun-17 Buyout $751mn-$2bn, Mega Buyout > $2bn Vintage 2005-2018: Small Buyout ≤ $500mn, Mid Buyout $501mn-$1,500mn, Large Source: Preqin Buyout $1,501mn-$4.5bn, Mega Buyout > $4.5bn 1 © 2018 Preqin Ltd. / www.preqin.com PRIVATE CAPITAL PERFORMANCE UPDATE: Q2 2017 Fig. 6: Private Capital Assets under Management by Vintage Year Fig. 7: Private Capital Assets under Management by Geographic (As at 30 June 2017) Focus (As at 30 June 2017) Vintage Year Dry Powder ($bn) Unrealized Value ($bn) Dry Powder Unrealized Value Geographic Focus ($bn) ($bn) 2000 3.6 3.7 North America 932.6 1,794.9 2001 1.9 3.0 Europe 411.6 756.8 2002 2.9 2.8 2003 1.2 5.9 Asia 251.2 513.1 2004 2.0 13.3 Latin America 19.1 57.7 2005 4.5 42.2 Diversified Multi-Regional 21.5 48.1 2006 13.0 124.1 Australasia 15.4 30.6 2007 12.3 188.4 Middle East & Israel 8.9 27.2 2008 13.8 215.2 Africa 10.3 25.6 2009 7.0 102.3 Source: Preqin 2010 7.6 139.6 Fig. 8: Private Capital Assets under Management by Fund Type 2011 26.2 296.8 (As at 30 June 2017) 2012 32.2 270.8 2013 60.3 249.6 Fund Type Dry Powder ($bn) Unrealized Value ($bn) 2014 121.4 252.3 Private Equity 970.1 1,850.5 2015 223.4 170.7 Real Estate 245.5 565.4 2016 329.2 106.0 Private Debt 226.8 410.5 2017 282.6 29.6 Infrastructure 149.3 268.4 Source: Preqin Natural Resources Only 70.9 158.2 Source: Preqin Fig. 9: Change in NAVPS and Share Price of Listed Private Equity Fig. 10: Private Capital Median Net IRRs by Fund Type by Quarter (As at 30 June 2017) 35% 35% 30% 30% 25% Private 20% 25% Capital 15% 10% 20% Buyout 5% 15% 0% Venture Previous Quarter -5% 10% Capital -10% Median Net IRR Average Change in NAV from 5% -15% Real Estate -20% 0% Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -5% Change in NAVPS of Change in Share Price of 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Listed Private Equity Listed Private Equity Vintage Year Source: Preqin Private Equity Online Source: Preqin Fig. 11: Private Capital – J-Curve: Annual Median Net IRRs by Vintage Year 20% Vintage 2005 15% PREQIN’S PRIVATE EQUITY DATA PLATFORM Vintage 2006 10% Vintage 2007 Preqin provides unrivalled data and intelligence 5% Vintage 2008 on private equity and venture capital, including fundraising, fund managers, institutional investors, fund 0% Vintage 2009 performance, deals and exits, service providers, fund 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 terms and conditions and more. -5% Vintage 2010 Median Net IRR -10% Vintage 2011 : [email protected] -15% Vintage 2012 : www.preqin.com/privateequity Vintage 2013 -20% Vintage 2014 -25% Investment Year Source: Preqin 2 © 2018 Preqin Ltd. / www.preqin.com PRIVATE CAPITAL PERFORMANCE UPDATE: Q2 2017 Fig. 12: PrEQIn Quarterly Index: All Strategies 600 PrEQIn Private Capital 500 PrEQIn Buyout PrEQIn Venture Capital 400 PrEQIn Real Estate 300 PrEQIn Fund of Funds Index Return 200 PrEQIn Distressed Private Equity S&P 500 TR 100 (Rebased to 100 as of 31-Dec-2000) PrEQIn Private Equity 0 30-Jun-01 30-Jun-02 30-Jun-03 30-Jun-04 30-Jun-05 30-Jun-06 30-Jun-07 30-Jun-08 30-Jun-09 30-Jun-10 30-Jun-11 30-Jun-12 30-Jun-13 30-Jun-14 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-17 31-Dec-00 31-Dec-01 31-Dec-02 31-Dec-03 31-Dec-04 31-Dec-05 31-Dec-06 31-Dec-07 31-Dec-08 31-Dec-09 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-14 31-Dec-15 31-Dec-16 Source: Preqin Fig. 13: Consistent Top Performing Buyout Fund Managers Total Funds Overall No. No. of Funds in No. of Funds in Average Quartile Firm Location Raised in Last of Funds with Top Quartile Second Quartile Rank 10 Years ($mn) Quartile Ranking Inflexion UK 3,292 5 5 0 1.00 Auctus Management Germany 503 4 4 0 1.00 Clearview Capital US 575 3 3 0 1.00 Main Capital Partners Netherlands 431 3 3 0 1.00 FIMI Israel 2,427 5 4 1 1.20 Altor Sweden 5,292 4 3 1 1.25 Wynnchurch Capital Partners US 1,840 4 3 1 1.25 Quadrant Private Equity Australia 3,136 6 5 0 1.33 Vista Equity Partners US 26,761 6 4 2 1.33 Altaris US 938 3 2 1 1.33 Corpfin Capital Spain 274 3 2 1 1.33 DFW Capital Partners US 577 3 2 1 1.33 Egeria Capital Management Netherlands 2,509 3 2 1 1.33 Gilde Equity Management Netherlands 633 3 2 1 1.33 Benelux Industrial Growth Partners US 1,400 3 2 1 1.33 Montefiore Investment France 964 3 2 1 1.33 Nautic Partners US 2,241 3 2 1 1.33 Platinum Equity US 13,000 3 2 1 1.33 Seidler Equity Partners US 1,173 5 4 0 1.40 Ethos South Africa 1,117 5 3 2 1.40 Source: Preqin Fig. 14: Consistent Top Performing Growth Fund Managers Total Funds Overall No. No. of Funds in No. of Funds in Average Quartile Firm Location Raised in Last of Funds with Top Quartile Second Quartile Rank 10 Years ($mn) Quartile Ranking Ampersand Capital Partners US 445 5 5 0 1.00 Trustbridge Partners China 1,975 5 5 0 1.00 KJK Capital Finland 183 3 2 1 1.33 Technology Crossover Ventures US 4,730 5 2 3 1.60 Amundi Private Equity France 334 3 1 2 1.67 Frontier Capital US 1,340 3 1 2 1.67 LLR Partners US 1753 4 1 3 1.75 Enfoca Inversiones Peru 1420 5 1 4 1.80 Spectrum Equity US 3055 6 2 3 1.83 Source: Preqin 3 © 2018 Preqin Ltd. / www.preqin.com PRIVATE CAPITAL PERFORMANCE UPDATE: Q2 2017 Fig. 15: Consistent Top Performing Venture Capital Fund Managers Total Funds Overall No. No. of Funds in No. of Funds in Average Quartile Firm Location Raised in Last of Funds with Top Quartile Second Quartile Rank 10 Years ($mn) Quartile Ranking Benchmark Capital US 1,497 3 3 0 1.00 Pontifax AgTech US 608 3 3 0 1.00 Third Rock Ventures US 1,558 3 3 0 1.00 Avalon Ventures US 552 6 5 1 1.17 OrbiMed Advisors US 5,349 5 4 1 1.20 Sequoia Capital US 12,377 5 4 1 1.20 General Catalyst Partners US 2,010 4 3 1 1.25 Union Square Ventures US 988 4 3 1 1.25 Vickers Venture Partners Singapore 367 4 3 1 1.25 CRCM Venture Capital Hong Kong 103 3 2 1 1.33 DN Capital UK 486 3 2 1 1.33 Forbion Capital Partners Netherlands 585 3 2 1 1.33 Future Venture Capital Japan 19 3 2 1 1.33 Battery Ventures US 2,825 10 7 2 1.40 BlueRun Ventures US 395 5 4 0 1.40 CDH Investments China 9,201 5 3 2 1.40 Charles River Ventures US 1,088 5 3 2 1.40 Summit Partners US 10,465 10 5 5 1.50 Matrix Partners US 3,122 6 4 1 1.50 Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers US 6,735 6 3 3 1.50 Scottish Equity Partners UK 744 4 3 0 1.50 Greycroft Partners US 999 4 2 2 1.50 Pappas Ventures US 97 4 2 2 1.50 Source: Preqin Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Private Equity Program (PE Program)

    Private Equity Program (PE Program)

    Attachment 3, Page 1 of 28 California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Private Equity Program (PE Program) Quarterly Report Executive Summary (As of December 31, 2012) Presentation Date: February 19, 2013 This report is solely for the use of CalPERS personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted or reproduced for distribution outside CalPERS without prior written approval from Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Nothing herein is intended to serve as investment advice, a recommendation of any particular investment or type of investment, a suggestion of the merits of purchasing or selling securities, or an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity. Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Attachment 3, Page 2 of 28 Quarterly Report December 31, 2012 Table of Contents Section Tab Executive Summary 1 CalPERS’ Private Equity Program Performance Review 2 Private Equity Team Organizational Update 3 Private Equity Market Environment Overview 4 Appendices PE Program Relationships by Total Exposure Attachment 3, Page 3 of 28 Quarterly Report December 31, 2012 1.0 Introduction Private equity is a long-term asset class with performance results influenced by various factors. This report concentrates on several key exposures that contribute to performance results, including sector, geography, structure and vintage year. In addition, the broad industry trends highlighted herein may affect future performance results. 1.2 Highlights of Program Activity The PE Program outperformed the Policy Benchmark over the latest three-year period and posted an annual return above long-term return expectations as of December 31, 2012. However over the latest one, five, and ten-year periods, the PE Program underperformed the Policy Benchmark.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 345 Index A SAS 111, 267 SAS 112, 267–268 Accountants, 92, 223–226 SAS 113, 268 Accredited investors, 16, 339 SAS 114, 269 Acquisition, 339 SAS 115, 270 Acquisition Premium, 339 American Jobs and Closing Tax Advisors, selection of, 91–92 Loopholes Act of 2010, 54 Akerlof, George, 48 American Research and American Accounting Association Development Corporation (AAA), 339 (ARD), 31 American Institute of Certified American waterfall model, 10 Public Accountants (AICPA), Angel investing, 20–21 339 Antitakeover provisions, 93 accounting and review standards, Antitrust legislation, federal 270–271 235–238 SSARS 10, 271 Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act SSARS 12, 271 (1950), 237 auditing standards Clayton Antitrust Act (1914), SAS 1, 243 236 SAS 1 amendments, 257 Federal Trade Commission Act SAS 82, 249 (1914), 236–237 SAS 82 replacements, Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust 257–264 Improvement Act (1976), SAS 85 amendments, 257 140, 237–238 SAS 95, 249 Robinson-Patman Act (1936), SAS 99, 256–257 237 SAS 104,COPYRIGHTED 264 Sherman MATERIAL Antitrust Act (1890), SAS 105, 265 236 SAS 106, 265 Apollo Global Management, 53, 55 SAS 107, 265–266 Assessments, manufacturing, SAS 108, 266 319–333 SAS 109, 266 corporate vision and mission, SAS 110, 267 323–324 345 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 346 346 INDEX Assessments, manufacturing Breakup fee, 129–130, 339 (Continued) Bridge financing, 339 customer satisfaction and Broker-dealer, 339 perceived quality, 322–323 Bulge bracket bank, 74 employee satisfaction, 320–322 Business development companies equipment and facility (BDCs), 54 maintenance, 324–326 Business intelligence, 277–292, 339 inventory management and application to private equity, product flow, 327–328 291–292 operational data and cost of sales, exit strategy, 292 328 investment decision, 291 visual management, 326 portfolio companies, strategic Audit, scaling, 206 management of, 291 Auditing Standards.
  • Venture Capital Postively Disrupts

    Venture Capital Postively Disrupts

    PRIVATE CLIENT SERIES VENTURE CAPITAL POSITIVELY DISRUPTS INTERGENERATIONAL INVESTING Families of wealth face three key questions about intergenerational wealth planning: how best to invest to sustain future generations; how best to engage the next genera- tion; and how best to ensure family unity endures. Often each question is addressed independently. We find that a conversation across generations about the impact of a meaningful venture capital (VC) allocation can help address all three questions in an integrated manner. Venture capital offers the potential for attractive returns relative to public equity markets, often in a tax-advantaged manner, thus allowing the portfolio to generate more wealth to support current and future generations. Bringing the next generation into the conversation about the changing investing landscape also offers the oppor- tunity for both generations to learn about the unique aspects of VC investing and the critical role it can play in the family’s portfolio. Furthermore, the vast potential that exists for making lasting impact through VC, both in terms of financial returns and contributions to society, may provide unifying experiences across generations. For many families, venture investing may provide a connection to the original roots of entrepreneurship that created the family wealth. As VC spurs continued innovation and industry disruption, families should consider the potential positive disruption the inclusion of VC can bring to their intergenerational investment plans. This paper provides some context for considering such an inclusion by discussing the investment potential and implications for interested investors. Venture, the source of future returns Whether it be cloud computing, machine learning, or artificial intelligence, emerging technologies are transforming many industries.
  • Agenda Item 5B

    Agenda Item 5B

    Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 1 of 45 SEMI - ANNUAL PERFORMANCE R EPORT California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Semi-Annual Report – June 30, 2017 MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP B OSTON C HICAGO M IAMI P ORTLAND S AN D IEGO L ONDON M ASSACHUSETTS I LLINOIS F LORIDA O REGON C ALIFORNIA U N I T E D K INGDOM www.meketagroup.com Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 2 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Executive Summary 2. Private Equity Industry Review 3. Portfolio Overview 4. Program Performance 5. Program Activity 6. Appendix Vintage Year Statistics Glossary Prepared by Meketa Investment Group Page 2 of 45 Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 3 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Introduction Overview This report provides a review of CalPERS Private Equity Program as of June 30, 2017, and includes a review and outlook for the Private Equity industry. CalPERS began investing in the private equity asset class in 1990. CalPERS currently has an 8% interim target allocation to the private equity asset class. As of June 30, 2017, CalPERS had 298 investments in the Active Portfolio, and 319 investments in the Exited Portfolio1. The total value of the portfolio was $25.9 billion2, with total exposure (net asset value plus unfunded commitments) of $40.2 billion3. Executive Summary Portfolio The portfolio is diversified by strategy, with Buyouts representing the largest exposure at 66% of total Private Equity. Mega and Large buyout funds represent approximately 57% of CalPERS’ Buyouts exposure.
  • Private Equity

    Private Equity

    Private Equity: Accomplishments and Challenges by Greg Brown, University of North Carolina; Bob Harris, University of Virginia; Steve Kaplan, University of Chicago; Tim Jenkinson, University of Oxford; and David Robinson, Duke University ince the 1980s, there has been an ongoing discussion about the role of private S equity (PE) in the economy. As investors have flocked to the asset class, voices critical of the negative social impact of PE have grown louder. In this article, we examine what is known from the academic literature about the effects of private equity on corporate productivity, the returns for investors, and possible broader economic and social consequences. We catalogue what we believe to be strong evidence of the overall benefits of PE-backed companies and investors in private equity, as well as spillovers in the form of broader gains in economic productivity. We also describe apparent instances of PE shortcomings in some specific industries where negative social impacts can be measured in some way. In our view, private equity is “capitalism in high gear” and, Back to the 1980s as such, subject to most of the same debates concerning Our account of private equity begins at the end of the 1980s, economic and social conditions in a free enterprise system. when hostile takeovers and other often highly leveraged While some argue that the 2020 version of capitalism transactions, including a relative newcomer called the lever- (as practiced in the U.S. and much of the world) is inef- aged buyout (or LBO), came under fierce attack in both the fective in coping with current social needs, much of the press and conventional business circles.
  • Trends of Venture Capital Internationalisation the Impact of a Technology Ecosystem on Early Stage Cross- Border Investments

    Trends of Venture Capital Internationalisation the Impact of a Technology Ecosystem on Early Stage Cross- Border Investments

    Trends of Venture Capital Internationalisation The impact of a technology ecosystem on early stage cross- border investments . AUTHOR Anna Ahlm TUTOR Conny Overland Spring term 2014 FEA50E Degree Project in Business Administration for Master of Science in Business and Economics, 30 credits Abstract The venture capital industry has grown rapidly in the last decades to become an important source of financing for entrepreneurs. While research suggests that venture capital investments are more likely to be successful if done in close geographic proximity to the venture capital firm, there is clearly a trend of increasing international investments. This thesis looks at the venture capital community in New York to understand venture capital as a part of the development of New York’s technology cluster, and to understand venture capitalists view on cross-border investments. By applying the ecosystem resource perspective model, the study finds that venture capitalists have a strong influence on the technology ecosystem in New York, due to its large financial sector. The study also finds that ecosystem sub-sectors have developed by applying technology to the dominating business sectors in New York. The study also identifies a “reverse internationalisation”, whereby companies founded abroad relocate to New York at earlier stages in their development, as the growth of the New York ecosystem has increased its attractiveness to foreign founded companies. While the empirical results confirm an increasing interest for cross-border investing, the increased supply of early stage investment opportunities (U.S. and foreign founded) creates a strong incentive for a local investment strategy. Further, the study finds that venture capitalists mitigate the risks associated with cross-border investments by establishing funds in specific regions of interest, and by co- investing with local partners.
  • Private Equity Holdings Disclosure 06-30-2019

    Private Equity Holdings Disclosure 06-30-2019

    The Regents of the University of California Private Equity Investments as of June 30, 2019 (1) Capital Paid-in Capital Current Market Capital Distributed Total Value Total Value Description Vintage Year (2) Net IRR (3) Committed (A) Value (B) (C) (B+C) Multiple (B+C)/A) Brentwood Associates Private Equity II 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 4,253,768 4,253,768 1.42 5.5% Interwest Partners I 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,681,033 6,681,033 2.23 18.6% Alta Co Partners 1980 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,655,008 6,655,008 2.22 13.6% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund 1980 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 59,348,988 59,348,988 11.87 30.5% KPCB Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 142,535,631 143,035,469 3,955,643 1,138,738,611 1,142,694,253 7.99 39.4% WCAS Capital Partners II 1980 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 8,669,738 8,669,738 2.17 14.0% Brentwood Associates Private Equity III 1981 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 2,943,142 2,943,142 0.98 -0.2% Mayfield IV 1981 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 13,157,658 13,157,658 2.63 26.0% Sequoia Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 293,200,000 352,355,566 167,545,013 1,031,217,733 1,198,762,746 3.40 30.8% Alta II 1982 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 5,299,578 5,299,578 1.77 7.0% Interwest Partners II 1982 4,008,769 4,008,769 - 6,972,484 6,972,484 1.74 8.4% T V I Fund II 1982 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 6,744,334 6,744,334 1.69 9.3% Brentwood Associates Private Equity IV 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 10,863,119 10,863,119 2.17 10.9% WCAS Capital Partners III 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 9,066,954 9,066,954 1.81 8.5% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund II 1984
  • Aggregate Portfolio Private Equity Exposure Summary

    Aggregate Portfolio Private Equity Exposure Summary

    AGENDA BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE PENSION COMMISSIONERS August 3, 2017 8:30 a.m. Sam Diannitto Boardroom Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions Building 701 East 3rd Street, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Commissioner Diannitto will participate telephonically from 4612 El Reposo Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90065 An opportunity for the public to address the Board or Committee about any item on today’s agenda for which there has been no previous opportunity for public comment will be provided before or during consideration of the item. Members of the public who wish to speak on any item on today’s agenda are requested to complete a speaker card for each item they wish to address, and present the completed card(s) to the commission executive assistant. Speaker cards are available at the commission executive assistant’s desk. In compliance with Government Code Section 54957.5, non-exempt writings that are distributed to a majority or all of the Board or applicable Committee of the Board in advance of their meetings may be viewed at the office of the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System (LAFPP), located at 701 East 3rd Street, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90013, or by clicking on LAFPP’s website at www.lafpp.com, or at the scheduled meeting. Non-exempt writings that are distributed to the Board or Committee at a scheduled meeting may be viewed at that meeting. In addition, if you would like a copy of any record related to an item on the agenda, please contact the commission executive assistant, at (213) 279-3038 or by e-mail at [email protected].
  • Ready Coller Institute of Venture, • Sources of IP – We Will Awash with Cash

    Ready Coller Institute of Venture, • Sources of IP – We Will Awash with Cash

    ISSUE 1a — 2014 WELCOME ISSUE $45 THE VENTURE ECOSYSTEM FRAMEWORK: MESSY, FAST, AND GLOBAL 企业生态系统框架： 凌 乱 、快 速 、全 球 化 Trends Shaping the Venture Ecosystem in 2014 / 06 IS THE VC MODEL ‘BROKEN’? 风险投资模式“破损”了吗？ VC Success Definition and Understanding Who Wins and Who Loses / 20 MEASURING SCIENCE PARKS' PERFORMANCE 度量科技园区的业绩 TusPark, Imperial West, and 15 other Parks / 28 time to Impact THE PUBLIC VENTURE POLICY MENU A toolbox of PrOVEN 企业公共政策清单 Policies Public Authorities government policies /36 Can Take / 36 EDITORIAL BOARD Jeremy Coller Eli Talmor Contents Moshe Zviran Yesha Sivan (Editor-in-Chief) Robyn Klingler-Vidra (Associate Editor) COLLER INSTITUTE OF VENTURE 36 Yù (Zöe) Zhái Itai Asaf Odeya Pergament 04 Ann Iveson COPYRIGHT © Coller Institute of Venture at Tel Aviv University 2014 www.collerinstituteofventure.org 05 06 20 28 WHAT IS THE COLLER INSTITUTE MEASURING SCIENCE PARKS' OF VENTURE?—04 PERFORMANCE—28 TusPark, Imperial West, RESEARCH IS AT THE CORE and 15 other Parks OF THE CIV’S VISION—05 How they are designed and managed to T HE VENTURE ECOSYSTEM achieve optimal performance FRAMEWORK: MESSY, FAST, AND GLOBAL—06 Six Trends Shaping the THE PUBLIC VENTURE Venture Ecosystem in 2014 POLICY MENU—36 44 Policies Public Authorities This article presents a generative Can Take framework for the venture ecosystem and highlights the current trends Public policymakers’ tools for fostering affecting the ecosystem local venture ecosystems I S THE VC MODEL ‘BROKEN’?—20 NEWS IN BRIEF—44 VC Success Definition and The News section offers a selection
  • FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 Fintech Meets Alternative Investments

    FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 Fintech Meets Alternative Investments

    FT PARTNERS FINTECH INDUSTRY RESEARCH Alternative Investments FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Innovation in a Burgeoning Asset Class March 2020 DRAFT ©2020 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Alternative Investments FT Partners | Focused Exclusively on FinTech FT Partners’ Advisory Capabilities FT Partners’ FinTech Industry Research Private Capital Debt & Raising Equity Sell-Side / In-Depth Industry Capital Buy-Side Markets M&A Research Reports Advisory Capital Strategic Structuring / Consortium Efficiency Proprietary FinTech Building Advisory FT Services FINTECH Infographics Partners RESEARCH & Board of INSIGHTS Anti-Raid Advisory Directors / Advisory / Monthly FinTech Special Shareholder Committee Rights Plans Market Analysis Advisory Sell-Side Valuations / LBO Fairness FinTech M&A / Financing Advisory Opinion for M&A Restructuring Transaction Profiles and Divestitures Named Silicon Valley’s #1 FinTech Banker Ranked #1 Most Influential Person in all of Numerous Awards for Transaction (2016) and ranked #2 Overall by The FinTech in Institutional Investors “FinTech Excellence including Information Finance 40” “Deal of the Decade” • Financial Technology Partners ("FT Partners") was founded in 2001 and is the only investment banking firm focused exclusively on FinTech • FT Partners regularly publishes research highlighting the most important transactions, trends and insights impacting the global Financial Technology landscape. Our unique insight into FinTech is a direct result of executing hundreds of transactions in the sector combined with over 18 years of exclusive focus on Financial Technology FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments I. Executive Summary 5 II. Industry Overview and The Rise of Alternative Investments 8 i. An Introduction to Alternative Investments 9 ii. Trends Within the Alternative Investment Industry 23 III. Executive Interviews 53 IV.
  • Private Equityspotlight

    Private Equityspotlight

    Spotlight Private Equity www.preqin.com May 2010 / Volume 6 - Issue 5 Welcome to the latest edition of Private Equity Spotlight, the monthly newsletter from Preqin providing insights into private equity performance, investors and fundraising. Private Equity Spotlight combines information from our online products Performance Analyst, Investor Intelligence, Fund Manager Profi les, Funds in Market, Secondary Market Monitor and Deals Analyst. Secondaries in 2010 Feature Spotlight Fundraising Spotlight page 3 page 13 Secondaries in 2010 This month’s Fundraising Spotlight looks at buyout, venture and cleantech fundraising. There was expectation across the industry that there would be heightened activity on the secondary market in 2009. This month’s Feature Article examines why this never materialized Secondaries Spotlight page 16 and looks at what 2010 has in store for the secondary market. We look at statistics from Preqin’s industry-leading product, Secondary Market Monitor, and uncover the latest secondaries news. Performance Spotlight page 6 Secondaries Funds of Funds Investor Spotlight page 17 This month’s Performance Spotlight looks at private equity secondaries funds. This month’s Investor Spotlight examines investors’ attitudes towards the secondary market. Fund Manager Spotlight page 8 Conferences Spotlight page 19 This month’s Fund Manager Spotlight reveals which US states This month’s Conferences Spotlight includes details of upcoming have the most private equity fi rms and capital. events in the private equity world. Deals Spotlight Investor News page 10 page 21 This month’s Deals Spotlight looks at the latest buyout deals and Preqin’s latest product - Deals Analyst. All the latest news on private equity investors including • Abu Dhabi Investment Authority What would you like to see in Private Equity Spotlight? Email us at: [email protected].
  • NVCA 2021 YEARBOOK Data Provided by Dear Readers

    NVCA 2021 YEARBOOK Data Provided by Dear Readers

    YEARBOOK Data provided by Credits & Contact National Venture Capital Association NVCA Board of Directors 2020-2021 (NVCA) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Washington, DC | San Francisco, CA nvca.org | [email protected] | 202-864-5920 BARRY EGGERS Lightspeed Venture Partners, Venture Forward Chair Washington, DC | San Francisco, CA MICHAEL BROWN Battery Ventures, Chair-Elect ventureforward.org | [email protected] JILL JARRETT Benchmark, Treasurer ANDY SCHWAB 5AM Ventures, Secretary BOBBY FRANKLIN President and CEO PATRICIA NAKACHE Trinity Ventures, At-Large JEFF FARRAH General Counsel EMILY MELTON Threshold Ventures, At-Large JUSTIN FIELD Senior Vice President of Government MOHAMAD MAKHZOUMI NEA, At-Large Affairs MARYAM HAQUE Executive Director, Venture AT-LARGE Forward MICHAEL CHOW Research Director, NVCA and PETER CHUNG Summit Partner Venture Forward DIANE DAYCH Granite Growth Health Partners STEPHANIE VOLK Vice President of Development BYRON DEETER Bessemer Venture Partners RHIANON ANDERSON Programs Director, Venture SCOTT DORSEY High Alpha Forward RYAN DRANT Questa Capital CHARLOTTE SAVERCOOL Senior Director of PATRICK ENRIGHT Longitude Capital Government Affairs STEVE FREDRICK Grotech Ventures MICHELE SOLOMON Director of Administration CHRIS GIRGENTI Pritzker Group Venture Capital DEVIN MILLER Manager of Communications and JOE HOROWITZ Icon Ventures Digital Strategy GEORGE HOYEM In-Q-Tel JASON VITA, Director of Programming and CHARLES HUDSON Precursor Ventures Industry Relations JILL JARRETT Benchmark JONAS MURPHY Manager of Government Affairs