DOCSLIB.ORG

Although I Have Lived in London All My Life, I Have Yet to See Any Evidence of a Tradition Or Culture of Celebrating St George’S Day As a Public Festival

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Although I Have Lived in London All My Life, I Have Yet to See Any Evidence of a Tradition Or Culture of Celebrating St George’S Day As a Public Festival GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY London Assembly 27 March 2002 Appendix D Subject: Written Answers from the Assembly meeting held on 27 March 2002 Report of: Executive Director Of Secretariat 129 / 2002 - Stephen Byers Lynne Featherstone On February 20th, Kevin Maguire and Jill Treanor wrote in The Guardian, “To preside over the financial collapse of one vital plank of Britain’s transport system has proved a tragedy for Stephen Byers, to second a suffer would be a farce.” Why won’t the Mayor join with Liberal Democrats in calling for Stephen Byers to go, and to take his ill-fated, unloved and unworkable PPP plans with him? The PPP was devised by the Treasury not by Stephen Byers, therefore I do not believe he ought to resign over this matter 130 / 2002 - Draft Cultural Strategy Mike Tuffrey What has happened to your draft cultural strategy? Following the submission of the Cultural Strategy Group’s advice to me before Christmas my staff have agreed how to proceed on the development of my draft Cultural Strategy. I want to ensure that the strategy has a robust evidence base and a clear policy framework. The CSG conducted a range of research and consultation which has contributed to the strategy work but there are some areas that I want to see strengthened and to this end further work is being carried out over the next few months. I anticipate signing off a draft before the summer and it coming to Assembly in September for scrutiny. I would hope that the draft would be published for public consultation in later this year. 131 / 2002 - Nominations to Cultural Institutions Mike Tuffrey What nominations have you made to cultural institutions in your capacity as Mayor? I have nominated Yvonne Marson to the London Sports board, Maya Even to the board of the London Museums Agency, and Richard Sumray to the London Marathon Trust. These appointments are all from the Cultural Strategy Group. Maya Even is also a member of the board of the South Bank Centre but I did not make this appointment. In addition, I have nominated Trevor Phillips to the board of the Royal Parks, and Nicky Gavron to the London Advisory Board of English Heritage. 132 / 2002 - Student Access to Financial Support Graham Tope How will the Mayor use his influence to ensure that students in London have as much access to financial support as students in other regions within the UK? There is growing evidence that a combination of the high cost of living in London and the abolition of maintenance grants is pricing poorer students out of studying in London. This comes out strongly in two reports on higher education in London which I will be publishing next month. I have consistently argued that the government was wrong to abolish grants and introduce tuition fees, most recently at a 10,000 strong National Union Students rally in Trafalgar Square on 20 February. I will be making a submission to the government’s higher education review reiterating this point. I am able to use Mayoral powers to make some direct improvements to student living standards. In particular this year a record 174,000 students have taken advantage of the 30% travel discount via the TfL Student Photocard. I have asked TfL to examine extending the discount to include part-time students in hardship. 133 / 2002 - Assistance to Cultural Institutions Mike Tuffrey What financial or other assistance have you provided to museums, galleries, libraries, archives or other cultural institutions in Greater London? I have given support to a number of cultural institutions. In the heritage sector, officer advice and support has been given to the London Museums Agency, facilitating a meeting on the establishment of a London museum hub. Museums represented at the meeting included the Museum of London, the Grange Museum, Croydon Clocktower, the Horniman Museum, and the Geffrye Museum. Officers are working closely with Cultural Partners for London which includes London Arts, Heritage Lottery Fund, the London Libraries Development Agency and the Area Archives Council. I have explained in separate answers how I am supporting events and festivals that celebrate the cultural diversity of London, attract tourism and encourage economic development. 134 / 2002 - PPP, Risk Involved to Londoners Lynne Featherstone The Liberal Democrat team’s visit to the ‘Bids Room’ at London Underground to inspect the PPP draft contracts confirms us in our view that London council tax payers and funding for buses and street management are all potentially at risk if the PPP deal goes wrong. Can the Mayor give his own view of the risk involved to Londoners, and give an indication of what sort of rise in the GLA precept on council tax might be needed? The latest draft of the PPP contracts show that virtually no risk is now being taken by the private sector Infracos over the life of the PPP contracts. With regard to cost overruns, the Infracos are only liable for up to £50m over the first seven-and-a-half years of the PPP, a tiny amount of risk when one considers the PPP is likely to cost over £1bn a year in Infrastructure Service Charges alone. Furthermore, the Infracos total equity investment (an amount somewhat above £500m to be paid in over seven-and-a-half years) is not at risk until an LUL funded contingency fund of over £1bn over the same seven-and-a-half year period is exhausted. This money is also available to fund overruns, but if not needed for this purpose, it can be converted into profit. In total, if the Infracos are successful in exploiting all the financial avenues open to them through this PPP, then the rate of returns they can expect to achieve are way in excess of the 15-20% quoted by London Underground and Government sources. In fact, they would top the 35% figure that I have quoted in the past. In TfL’s recently published report, “Interim Consultation Response to London Transport”, it is estimated the private sector Infracos stand to make upwards of £4bn from what is now no more than a glorified maintenance contract. As if all this were not bad enough, the Comfort Letter drawn up by Government places Transport for London (TfL), and consequently the GLA, first in line when it comes to meeting the potential financial liabilities I have just outlined. Despite Government and Underground spin to the contrary, there is no long-term Treasury funding commitment to PPP – a fact confirmed by LT Deputy Chairman Brian Appleton at the most recent Transport Sub-Committee hearing into the PPP. Instead, there is a TfL guarantee of all payments to the Infracos. The consequences of all this for London are staggering. With TfL and GLA placed squarely at the front of the queue in terms of paying for this outrageously expensive PPP, and with no long-term funding guarantee from Treasury, my entire planned investment programme to improve London’s transport system is placed at risk. And if the Transport Budget is sucked dry by the PPP, the burden could fall on London’s taxpayers through the Council Tax precept. At this stage, it is impossible to predict just how much the PPP will cost London. Suffice to say, these PPP contracts are now little more than a licence to rob London. 135 / 2002 - PPP Safety Issues Lynne Featherstone What progress is being made by the Health and Safety Executive in getting London Underground Limited to resolve the 52 safety issues they have raised with them over the PPP arrangements? What kind of delay is this process going to cause to finalising the PPP contracts? Unfortunately, I must refer you to the Health and Safety Executive. However, it is widely acknowledged by transport and safety experts that breaking up a unified Tube system into four different organisations, as well as replicating the key split of operation of trains from maintenance of the track – a key problem in the collapse of Railtrack – increases the safety risk. This fact was even acknowledged by the London Transport Board in their 1997 Report, “The Future for London Underground – Evaluation of Options”, prepared when PPP was first floated as an idea for the Tube, which reported that PPP was clearly an inferior safety model. 136 / 2002 - Taxis After 10pm each evening Lynne Featherstone Since the introduction of your new ‘black cab’ fares regime, how many more taxis are there on the streets of central London after 10 pm each evening? Transport for London have been conducting surveys of the supply of taxis at night since the fare change, both on the streets and at ranks in Central London and on suburban ranks . The results demonstrate, in general, good availability of taxis nearly everywhere. One taxi radio circuit reports a 20% increase in cabs available at night. However data on the supply of taxis at night was never collected prior to the fare change and so it is not possible to make definitive comparisons. Anecdotally, I have lived in London all my life and have never known so many taxis available for hire at night in central London. Survey information was given to the Transport Operational Scrutiny Committee at its last meeting, and Peter Hendy has offered the detailed results. 137 / 2002 - Growth in London Population Graham Tope Oral Is the predicted growth in Londons population sustainable? answer 138 / 2002 - Consultation Protocols Sally Hamwee In your role as Chair of TfL you agreed that a protocol should be drawn up to ensure proper consultation is undertaken before TfL embark on new schemes. Are you planning to make sure that similar protocols exist when you undertake consultations as Mayor? I support the principle that locally elected representatives should be informed and consulted on initiatives proposed for their areas in advance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Branching out the Future for London's Street Trees
    EMBARGOED until 00.01am on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 Environment Committee Branching Out The future for London's street trees April 2011 EMBARGOED until 00.01am on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 EMBARGOED until 00.01am on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 Environment Committee Branching Out The future for London's street trees April 2011 Cover image source: George Raszka EMBARGOED until 00.01am on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority April 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN This publication is printed on recycled paper EMBARGOED until 00.01am on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 Environment Committee Members Darren Johnson Green (Chair) Murad Qureshi Labour (Deputy Chair) Gareth Bacon Conservative James Cleverly Conservative Roger Evans Conservative Nicky Gavron Labour Mike Tuffrey Liberal Democrat The Environment Committee agreed the following terms of reference for its investigation on 1 December 2010 • To examine what progress has been made for street trees in London since the committee’s 2007 report; and • What the future holds for street trees, and where responsibility for planting and maintenance will lie. The Committee would welcome feedback on this report. For further information contact: Jo Sloman, Assistant Scrutiny Manager, on 020 7983 4942 or [email protected]. For media enquiries please contact: Lisa Moore on 020 7983 4228 or [email protected]; or Julie Wheldon on 020 7983 4228 or [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London. Report
    A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Report of Conference at LSE 2 nd July 2010 Opening remarks of Chairman, Emeritus Professor George Jones, Chairman of the Greater London Group [GLG] This conference follows one of May 2007 held at City Hall, which had looked at the performance and demise of the Greater London Council [GLC]. Notable speakers at that event were the then Mayor, Ken Livingstone, and Lord (Desmond) Plummer, a former Conservative Leader of the GLC, who had since died. That earlier event was timed to mark the 40-year anniversary of the date when Plummer had become leader. Earlier this year L.J. [Jim] Sharpe died. He had been a research officer with the GLG in the early 1960s and had helped prepare evidence leading to the establishment of the GLC. He went on to write two pioneering GLG papers about the 1961 London County Council (LCC) Elections called A Metropolis Votes (1962) and about Research in Local Government (1965) . He remained a frequent visitor to the Group and writer about London government. I would like to dedicate this conference to Jim’s memory. The Group also lost a few days ago William Plowden who sat with me at GLG Monday afternoon meetings under the chairmanship of William Robson when I first joined the Group in 1966. Today’s conference is timely since the vesting day of the Greater London Authority [GLA], when it came into being, is ten years ago tomorrow. The objective of the conference is to assess the performance of the Mayor and Assembly that make up the GLA, looking at why and how it came into being, its achievements and disappointments.
    [Show full text]
  • 517 / 2004-Maylands Field
    GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY London Assembly 31 March 2004 Report No: 5 Subject: Questions to the Mayor Report of: Director Of Secretariat 342 / 2004 - Pedicabs Jenny Jones Can you provide us with a timetable for TfL reporting on the registration of Pedicabs, and moving towards their proper regulation? . 343 / 2004 - London-wide basis of Olympic Games bid Andrew Pelling While there is very good merit in our Olympic bid owing to the prospective concentration of facilities for athletes at our East London base, I am sure that you would agree with me that a successful Olympic bid will also be secured by emphasising the London-wide nature of the Olympic Games bid. What comments would you like to make about the London-wide basis of our bid? . 344 / 2004 - Traffic Signals in Croydon Andrew Pelling As part of the TfL work at the junction of Addington Road and Farleigh Road in Croydon, the decision has been made to remove the traffic lights which used to advise motorists whether or not traffic had been signalled to continue into their path and which were located ahead of motorists turning right at that junction. Please can we have these traffic lights reinstated? 345 / 2004 - Brighton Road, Coulsdon Andrew Pelling Why is it necessary to continue to designate the Brighton Road in the centre of Coulsdon as a Red Route after the construction of the Coulsdon Inner Relief Road? . 1 346 / 2004 - Traffic movements in Upper Norwood Andrew Pelling The unpopular one-way system introduced in Upper Norwood looks like being made permanent by the London Borough of Croydon.
    [Show full text]
  • 255 Consultation Report
    Consultation on possible changes to highway measures in support of the proposed extension of route 255 to Balham Summary of responses November 2011 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction 3 2 The consultation 3 3 Responses from members of the public 5 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other 8 stakeholders Appendices A Copy of the consultation letter 9 B Consultation area 14 C List of stakeholders consulted 16 2 1. Introduction In summer 2009 TfL consulted stakeholders and the local community about plans to extend bus route 255 from Streatham Hill to Balham. The route included Weir Road and Old Devonshire Road. The 2009 consultation response was mainly positive, particularly regarding the benefits of a new bus service in the parts of the area furthest from existing routes. There were 689 responses from members of the public of which 472 were generally supportive, 188 generally opposed and 29 neutral. Many of the local people who came to the consultation exhibitions in Weir Road community centre said they would find it easier to use the bus than take a long walk to and from their home, especially where they were older and/or do not have a car. However some concerns were raised about traffic issues, noise, changes to parking and changes to highway infrastructure, particularly on Old Devonshire Road in the London Borough of Wandsworth. TfL would still like to introduce the extended bus service to improve public transport facilities in the area and meet local requests. The concerns raised in the consultation have been discussed with both Lambeth and Wandsworth Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Evans (Chairman)
    Appendix 2 London Assembly (Plenary) – 5 March 2008 Transcript of Question and Answer Session with Simon Fletcher (Chief of Staff, GLA) and John Ross (Director, Economic and Business Policy, GLA) Sally Hamwee (Chair): We now move to the main item on today’s agenda: the question and answer session regarding the funding of organisations and GLA Group corporate governance, the Corporate Governance Review. Can I start by asking Simon Fletcher, as Chief of the Mayor’s Staff, to what extent you are responsible in your role as Chief of Staff for regulating and supervising the conduct of the Mayoral Advisers? Simon Fletcher (Chief of Staff, GLA): I would say my responsibility is to ensure that the Mayor’s advisers and directors are providing the Mayor with the best possible advice and do so in a timely fashion. That is a role of regulation, if you want to call it that, because it involves making sure that the most important issues facing the city are properly discussed and that the appropriate action is taken to deliver the Mayor’s priorities. The Mayor’s directors are people who directly report to me. Sally Hamwee (Chair): The question was about conduct but Mike Tuffrey has already caught my eye, so he might pursue that. Mike Tuffrey (AM): Simon, last time you were before us, a couple of years ago now, you painted a picture- Simon Fletcher (Chief of Staff, GLA): A bit more recently than that. Mike Tuffrey (AM): No, sorry, I mean in terms of answering questions regarding how the Mayor’s Office functions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Election Results for the Mayor of London and the London Assembly
    2004 election results for the Mayor of London and the London Assembly The 2004 Mayor of London election results If there are only two candidates, the Mayor of London is elected using the First Past the Post system. The candidate with the most votes wins. If there are three or more candidates running for Mayor, the Supplementary Vote system is used to ensure the candidate with the broadest amount of support from London is elected. In this system, voters can cast a first and second choice vote. If a candidate receives more than half of all the first choice votes they are elected. If this does not happen, the top two candidates with the most first choice votes go through to a second round. All other candidates are eliminated, but the second choice votes on their ballot papers are looked at. If they are for either of the top two candidates, these second choices are added to their totals. The candidate with the highest total of first and second choice votes wins. If there is a tie then the Greater London Returning Officer draws lots. 1st % 1st 2nd Final Name Party choice* choice choice* total Ken Livingstone Labour Party 685,548 36.78 142,842 828,390 Steve Norris Conservative Party 542,423 29.10 124,757 667,180 Simon Hughes Liberal Democrats 284,647 15.27 UK Independence Frank Maloney 115,666 6.21 Party Lindsey German Respect 61,731 3.31 Julian Leppert British National Party 58,407 3.13 Darren Johnson Green Party 57,332 3.08 Christian Peoples Ram Gidoomal 41,698 2.24 Alliance Independent Working Lorna Reid 9,542 0.51 Class Association Tammy Independent 6,692 0.36 Nagalingam * These numbers reflect the number of valid votes and do not include those ballot papers which were spoilt.
    [Show full text]
  • WEEK in WESTMINSTER £25 Million Boost for New Apprentices London
    WEEK IN WESTMINSTER Week ending Friday 29 July £25 million boost for new London Assembly Lib Dems apprentices call for London's buses and Prime Minister David Cameron has announced details taxis to go electric of a £25m fund that will support up to 10,000 London Assembly Liberal Democrats have put forward advanced and higher apprenticeships in sectors such a programme to convert high mileage buses, taxis and as advanced manufacturing, engineering and IT. The light goods vehicles to electric power by 2020. “The Higher Apprenticeships Fund will support the Big Switch” was launched at City Hall with support expansion of apprenticeships up to degree equivalent from the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate in companies, particularly SMEs, where there is Change, Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP. Mike Tuffrey the unmet demand for the higher level skills that are Liberal Democrat London Assembly environment necessary to create additional jobs and growth. On a spokesman stated: "Electric cars are welcome, but visit to the Jaguar Land Rover plant in the Midlands, bang for buck the biggest benefits come from Mr Cameron said: “It is crucial that we build up the electrifying the vehicles that clock up the most miles skills in this country that our businesses need and that and generate the most pollution. Look at the facts and will fuel long term growth. We are investing in it is a no brainer that the top priority is to electrify apprenticeships because we know they work – they buses, taxis and vans". (Source: GLA LibDems) are good for people who want to get ahead, good for http://glalibdems.org.uk/en/article/2011/504093/the- business and good for the country”.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater London Authority
    GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY London Assembly 24 July 2002 Report No: 5 Subject: Questions to the Mayor Report of: Executive Director Of Secretariat 296 / 2002 - Vauxhall Cross Elizabeth Howlett Has the phasing of traffic lights at junctions in Central London been altered from 10 seconds to 6 seconds and if so what was the reason for the change of timing? . 297 / 2002 - Vauxhall Cross Elizabeth Howlett Is the Mayor aware that residents of Wandsworth have to suffer from continual traffic congestion on Battersea Park Road and Nine Elms Lane leading to Vauxhall Cross. Even on a Sunday the traffic jams are as though it’s a Friday evening rush hour. Can the Mayor explain why this should be and what steps are being taken to resolve this? . 298 / 2002 - Vauxhall Cross Elizabeth Howlett It is evident to the residents of Wandsworth that the increased delays on Battersea Park Road, Nine Elms Lane and Wandsworth Road is leading to angry and frustrated drivers who ry to gain some advantage. Can the Mayor tell us what proposals he has to resolve this dangerous and unacceptable situation? . 299 / 2002 - Vauxhall Cross Elizabeth Howlett Is it the case that the traffic signal system at Vauxhall Cross has been set to give the impression that the scheme on Vauxhall Cross can cope with traffic when in fact the traffic is being forced to queue on the roads leading to it? . 300 / 2002 - Vauxhall Cross Elizabeth Howlett Can the Mayor guarantee that the traffic signal timings are set to the optimum to assist the flow of traffic, whilst taking into account the safe passage of pedestrians? .
    [Show full text]
  • Mayoral Election
    The 2004 London Elections Includes results from the 2005 Parliamentary General Election in London and from the 2006 London Borough Council General Elections Previous publications on local government elections General Election of Greater London Councillors - 9 April 1964 London Borough Council Elections - 7 May 1964 General Election of Greater London Councillors - 13 April 1967 London Borough Council Elections - 9 May 1968 Greater London Council Elections - 9 April 1970 London Borough Council Elections - 13 May 1971 Greater London Council Elections - 12 April 1973 London Borough Council Elections - 2 May 1974 Greater London Council Elections - 5 May 1977 London Borough Council Elections - 4 May 1978 Greater London Council Elections - 7 May 1981 London Borough Council Elections - 6 May 1982 London Borough Council Elections - 8 May 1986 Inner London Education Authority Direct Elections - 8 May 1986 London Borough Council Elections - 3 May 1990 London Borough Council By-elections - May 1990 to May 1994 London Borough Council Elections - 5 May 1994 London Borough Council Elections - 7 May 1998 London Borough Council Elections - 2 May 2002 Published 1964 to 1982 by the Greater London Council, 1986 by the London Residuary Body, 1990 to 1998 by the London Research Centre, and 2002 by the Greater London Authority. The London Elections 10 June 2004 The Parliamentary General Election 5 May 2005 The London Borough Council General Elections 4 May 2006 Michael Minors Dennis Grenham Copyright: Greater London Authority October 2006 Published by: Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 10: 1 85261 916 3 ISBN 13: 978 1 85261 916 9 Acknowledgements: This publication has grown over two years and the authors recognise the considerable contribution made by the kind help, advice and support given by many people at the GLA.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Mayor Report Of: Executive Director of Secretariat
    9 September 2009 PRIORITY ORDER PAPER Report No: 5 Subject: Questions to the Mayor Report of: Executive Director Of Secretariat Questions not asked during Mayor’s Question Time will be given a written response by Monday 14 September 2009 Thames Question No: 2287 / 2009 Richard Tracey Will you be meeting with Thames Water to discuss the overflow of 20,000 tonnes of raw sewage into the Thames in July, which poses a health risk for river users including rowers and swimmers? Bus services Question No: 2177 / 2009 Jenny Jones KPMG recently suggested the following options for funding the bus subsidy in the event that government contributions are insufficient: · Increasing fares; · Reducing the coverage or volume of the network; · Cancelling, deferring or re-scoping committed projects or infrastructure enhancement; and · Reducing the network quality standard or the removal of one or more of the quality incentive regimes. Which of these options are you considering? Bus Services Question No: 2478 / 2009 Valerie Shawcross Can Londoners be confident about your stewardship of their bus services? Inflation and fares Question No: 2368 / 2009 Caroline Pidgeon In the light of the July Retail Price Index showing a fall of 1.4%, will you make a statement about 1 your plans for public transport fares in London from January 2010? A&E Closure Question No: 2331 / 2009 James Cleverly Will the Mayor join me in deploring the closure of the Queen Mary’s Sidcup A&E from 8pm to 8am every night? Affordable Housing Question No: 2479 / 2009 Nicky Gavron Are you aware
    [Show full text]
  • London's Political Map 2008
    BOROUGH POLITICAL CONTROL 1998 2002 2006 LONDON’S CONSERVATIVE 4 8 14 LABOUR 18 15 7 LIBERAL DEMOCRAT 2 3 3 THE MAYOR CHAIRMAN NO OVERALL CONTROL 8 6 8 Boris Johnson LONDON COUNCILS POLITICAL Conservative Councillor Majority: 139,772 Merrick Cockell LONDON COUNCILS ENFIELD & HARINGEY MAP 2008 Joanne McCartney CHAIRMAN Merrick Cockell Labour CHIEF EXECUTIVE John O’Brien Majority: 1,402 Here’s an updated London Political www.londoncouncils.gov.uk Map following the GLA Elections on GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY 1 May 2008. We have highlighted the 14 BARNET & CAMDEN Brian Coleman London Assembly super-constituencies Conservative Majority: 19,693 THE MAYOR Boris Johnson alongside the 33 boroughs. NORTH EAST FIRST DEPUTY MAYOR & CHIEF Hackney, Islington EXECUTIVE OF THE GLA GROUP Tim Parker and Waltham Forest Jennette Arnold CHIEF EXECUTIVE Anthony Mayer (until September 2008) Labour www.london.gov.uk Majority: 28,437 HAVERING & REDBRIDGE Roger Evans Conservative LONDON WIDE ASSEMBLY MEMBERS ENFIELD Majority: 43,025 BRENT & HARROW Michael Rye Navin Shah Labour Majority: 1,649 GARETH BACON RICHARD BARNBROOK Conservative BNP BARNET Mike Freer HARROW WALTHAM FOREST David Ashton Lab/LDem coalition HARINGEY Clyde Loakes (Lab) George Meehan REDBRIDGE ANDREW BOFF VICTORIA BORWICK Alan Weinberg Conservative Conservative HAVERING Michael White BRENT EALING & HILLINGDON LDem/Con coalition HACKNEY DEE DOOCEY NICKY GAVRON Paul Lorber (LDem) CAMDEN ISLINGTON Mayor Jules Pipe (Lab) Liberal Democrat Labour Richard Barnes LDem/Con coalition LDem minority Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DOCUMENT.Indd
    London Councils' Directory 2007 A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LONDON London Councils (formerly the Association of London Government) 591/2 Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Tel: 020 7934 9999 Fax: 020 7934 9991 ISBN: 1 85494 121 6 Price £35.00* September 2006 *£17.50 to London boroughs & voluntary organisations 1 2 CONTENTS About us 7 Greater London Employment Forum 11 Grants Committee 12 Leaders’ Committee 10 Staff 14 Transport and Environment Committee 13 London Government A brief history 17 Recent changes to London’s government 17 The London boroughs 19 Borough election results 2006 21 Town Hall addresses 24 About the data 27 The London boroughs Barking and Dagenham 28 Barnet 33 Bexley 40 Brent 46 Bromley 52 Camden 58 Croydon 63 Ealing 69 Enfield 76 Greenwich 82 Hackney 89 Hammersmith and Fulham 95 Haringey 100 Harrow 107 Havering 113 Hillingdon 119 Hounslow 125 Islington 132 Kensington and Chelsea 137 Kingston upon Thames 143 Lambeth 150 Lewisham 156 Merton 161 Newham 166 3 CONTENTS The London boroughs (continued) Redbridge 173 Richmond upon Thames 181 Southwark 188 Sutton 195 Tower Hamlets 201 Waltham Forest 208 Wandsworth 214 Westminster 222 City of London 228 Greater London Authority 236 London Development Agency 239 London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority 241 Metropolitan Police Authority 244 Transport for London 246 London MPs 247 London MEPs 249 Government departments 250 London local government professional associations 253 Health care in London 256 London Learning and Skills Councils 262 Other useful addresses 265 Media
    [Show full text]