DOCSLIB.ORG

Ireland's National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ireland’s National Strategy for Plant Conservation Progress towards 2020 Target 1 Target 9 Widely accessible preliminary census lists of all wild Conserve the genetic diversity of all known indigenous traditional plant species, and fungi, found in Ireland Irish agricultural plant varieties of crops, land races and crop relatives as well as other socio-economically valuable plant Target 2 species. A preliminary assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species in Ireland completed and made Target 10 widely available. Management plans in place for at least 10 major alien species that threaten plants, plant communities and associated habitats and Target 3 ecosystems in Ireland. Comprehensive and documented suite of practical solutions based on new or tested models, case studies, Target 11 research and other experiences available for plant No species of wild flora endangered by international trade. conservation and sustainable use in Ireland. Target 12 Target 4 All plant-based products derived from Irish wild plants harvested At least 15 per cent of each of Ireland’s plant habitats from sustainably managed sources. effectively conserved. Target 13 Target 5 Safeguard the traditional practices based on plant resources, and Protection of the most important areas for plant diversity their associated knowledge that support local communities and assured. their livelihoods in Ireland. Target 6 Target 14 At least 30 per cent of production lands managed Ensure that plant conservation and biodiversity issues are consistent with the conservation of plant diversity. incorporated into the formal educational curricula at all levels, and in informal education and national public awareness programmes. Target 7 Conservation of at least 60 per cent of Ireland’s threatened Target 15 plant species assured in situ. The number of trained people working with appropriate facilities in plant conservation increased, as required, to achieve the targets Target 8 of this Strategy. All threatened plant species in accessible ex situ collections, and all Critically Endangered and Endangered Target 16 category species included in effective conservation Broadly based Irish network for plant conservation established to management programmes. achieve the targets for this strategy. 2 | 01 857 0909 / [email protected] Ireland’s National Strategy for Plant Conservation | 3 Back to Targets 1-8 Back to Targets 1-8 Target 1 Target 2 Widely accessible preliminary census A preliminary assessment of the lists of all wild plant species, and conservation status of all known plant fungi, found in Ireland species in Ireland completed and made widely available. Highlights Highlights Census lists of Irish species Ireland has recently updated its Flora Protection Order Census catalogues and preliminary checklists are available (2015) on the National Botanic Gardens website for lichens • This gives legal protection to 68 vascular plant (2010), marine algae (2008), mosses (2008), liverworts species and 65 species of bryophytes (25 liverworts (2008), hornworts (2008), seed plants (1987) & alien and 40 mosses) http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/ species (2002) Target 1 Target 2 eli/2015/si/356/made/en/print World Flora Online Consortium. (www.worldfloraonline.org). The Director and Scientific National Level National Level New Red lists for Irish species using IUCN guidelines for both vascular plants (2016) and bryophytes (2012) Staff of the National Botanic Gardens are also affiliated Progress Progress with the project and the most recent World Flora Online • Of the 1,211 vascular plants assessed for Irelands Council Meeting took place at Trinity College Dublin and Red data book in 2016, 106 (8.8%) , 20 (1.7%) are Achieved Achieved the National Botanic Gardens (3-7th December 2018) Critically Endangered, 25 (2.1%) are Endangered and 61 (5.0%) are Vulnerable • Red list of Irish Vascular plants completed in 2016 (Wyse Jackson, M., FitzPatrick, Ú., Cole, E., Jebb, M., McFerran, References D., Sheehy Skeffington, M. & Wright, M. (2016). Ireland Bryant, J.A., Stewart, N.F. & Stace, C.A., 2002. Legon, N.W., Henrici, A., Roberts, P.J., A checklist of Characeae of the British Isles. Spooner, B.M. & Watling, R., 2005. Checklist Red list No. 10. Vascular Plants. https://www.npws.ie/ Watsonia 24: 203-208. of the British and Irish Basidiomycota. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. On track On track content/publications/ireland-red-list-no10- Devlin, Z. The wildflowers of Ireland. A field to Achieve to Achieve guide. The Collins Press. O’Hanlon, R., and T.J. Harrington 2011. vascular-plants Diversity and distribution of mushroom- Fox, H., 2001. Census catalogue of the forming fungi (Agaricomycetes) in Ireland. • Red Data List of Bryophytes completed in 2012 and lichenicolous fungi of Ireland (~150 species). Biology and Environment: Proceedings of National Botanic Gardens, Dublin. the Royal Irish Academy, vol. 111B, no. 2, available (Lockhart, N., Hodgetts, N. & Holyoak, D. (2012) Guiry, M.D., 1979. A consensus and pp. 117–133. Ireland Red List No. 8: Bryophytes. National Parks and bibliography of Irish Seaweeds. Bibliotheca Reynolds, S.C.P., A catalogue of alien plants Phycologica 44: 1-287 [513 species]. in Ireland. 2002. National Botanic Gardens, Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Hardy, G. and Guiry, M.D. 2008. A Checklist Glasnevin. Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.) https://www.npws.ie/ Insufficient Insufficient and Atlas of the Seaweeds of Britain Seaward, M.R.D., 2010. Census Catalogue of and Ireland. 2nd corrected Edn. British Irish Lichens (3rd Edition). National Museums Progress Progress Phycological Society. Northern Ireland, Belfast. Henderson, D.M., 2000. A Checklist of the Rust Scannell, M. & Synnott, D.M. 1987. Census Fungi of the British Isles. British Mycological Catalogue of the Flora of Ireland. Government Society, Cambridge, England, UK. Publications, Stationary Office. Hill, M.O., Blackstock, T.H., Long, D.G. & http://botanicgardens.ie/science-and- Rothero, G.P., 2008. A checklist and census learning/irish-florarecords/. catalogue of British and Irish bryophytes updated 2008. Middlewich, Cheshire: British http://www.biodiversityireland.ie/ Bryological Society. wordpress/wp-content/uploads/ No No Irelands-Biodiversity-20101.pdf Progress Progress Achievable by 2020 Achievable by 2020 4 | 01 857 0909 / [email protected] Ireland’s National Strategy for Plant Conservation | 5 Back to Targets 1-8 Back to Targets 1-8 Target 4 At least 15 per cent of each of Ireland’s plant habitats effectively conserved. Highlights A large percentage of our most important and distinctive Irish habitats are formally protected in Special Areas of Conservation Target 3 Percentage of Specialist EU Annexed Irish Habitats in Special Areas of Conservation ArticlePercentage 17 Assessment of Specialist in 2013 EU Annexed = BAD Irish Habitats = POOR in Special Areas of Conservation Comprehensive and documented suite of practical solutions Article 17 Assessment in 2013 = BAD = POOR based on new or tested models, case studies, research and Source SDF Statistics June 2015 available from NPWS other experiences available for plant conservation and 84 83 84 73 83 sustainable use in Ireland. 67 73 67 56 67 67 56 Highlights Ireland’s plant diversity is relatively well surveyed. There is an updated Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland Atlas of the flora due in 2020. Which aims to provide maps for both native and introduced taxa, interactive maps to display frequency and distribution at various scales and an analysis of change summarising the state Machair Turlough Orchid rich Active raised Limestone Old Oak grassland bog pavement Woodlands of the Irish flora in 2020. https://bsbi.org/atlas-2020 More positive news on one of our most distinctive Irish habitat peatlands More positive news on one of our most distinctive Irish habitat peatlands The National Biodiversity data centre have a number of current initiatives providing • Despite a 26.7% loss in peatlands with 735 108 ha remaining. Of this 35.8% information, on invasive species, vascular species, bryophytes, Irelands pollinator plan and • orDespite 263 288 a 26.7% ha is currentlyloss in peatlands in conservation with 735 worthy 108 ha status. remaining. With State, Of this ownership 35.8% national biodiversity indicators http://www.biodiversityireland.ie/. ofor 6%263 and 288 29.5%ha is currently in private in ownership. conservation To worthymeet the status. 15% With set out State, in the ownership National Plant Conservationof 6% and 29.5% Strategy in private this equatesownership. with To 33,493 meet hathe of 15% conservation set out in theworthy National peatlands Plant The National Botanic Gardens continue to work on a range of projects related to plant beingConservation effectively Strategy managed. this equates In light with of the 33,493 State ha owning of conservation in excess ofworthy that target, peatlands taxonomy, invasive species, plant conservation, sustainable use www.botanicgardens.ie/ i.e.being 45 015effectively ha, this ismanaged. a most achievable In light of target.the State owning in excess of that target, scienceandlearning/projects i.e. 45 015 ha, this is a most achievable target. Target 3 National Level Progress Target 4 National Level Progress No Insufficient On track Achieved No Insufficient On track Achieved Progress Progress to Achieve Progress Progress to Achieve Achievable by 2020 Achievable by 2020 6 | 01 857 0909 / [email protected] Ireland’s National Strategy for Plant Conservation | 7 Back
Recommended publications
  • Alberta Wetland Classification System – June 1, 2015

    Alberta Wetland Classification System – June 1, 2015

    Alberta Wetland Classification System June 1, 2015 ISBN 978-1-4601-2257-0 (Print) ISBN: 978-1-4601-2258-7 (PDF) Title: Alberta Wetland Classification System Guide Number: ESRD, Water Conservation, 2015, No. 3 Program Name: Water Policy Branch Effective Date: June 1, 2015 This document was updated on: April 13, 2015 Citation: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (ESRD). 2015. Alberta Wetland Classification System. Water Policy Branch, Policy and Planning Division, Edmonton, AB. Any comments, questions, or suggestions regarding the content of this document may be directed to: Water Policy Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development 7th Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: 780-644-4959 Email: [email protected] Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Information Centre Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 108 Street Edmonton Alberta Canada T5K 2M4 Call Toll Free Alberta: 310-ESRD (3773) Toll Free: 1-877-944-0313 Fax: 780-427-4407 Email: [email protected] Website: http://esrd.alberta.ca Alberta Wetland Classification System Contributors: Matthew Wilson Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Thorsten Hebben Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Danielle Cobbaert Alberta Energy Regulator Linda Halsey Stantec Linda Kershaw Arctic and Alpine Environmental Consulting Nick Decarlo Stantec Environment and Sustainable Resource Development would also
  • Irish Botanical News

    Irish Botanical News

    IRISH BOTANICAL NEWS Number 3 February, 1993 Edited by: Dr Brian S. Rushton, University of Ulster Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA Published by: The Committee for Ireland Botanical Society of the British Isles COMMITTEE FOR IRELAND, 1992-93 BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF THE BRITISH ISLES Elected at the Annual General Meeting, held in the National Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin, Dublin on 3rd October, 1992 (office bearers were subsequently elected at the first Committee meeting): Mr John C.L. Phillips, Chairman (retiring October, 1993) Dr Ralph S. Forbes, Secretary (retiring October, 1993) Dr David W. Nash, Field Meetings Secretary (retiring October, 1994) Miss Maura J.P. Scannell (retiring October, 1994) Dr Micheline J. Sheehy Skeffington (retiring October, 1994) Mr John J. Earley (retiring October, 1995) Mr Alan Hill (retiring October, 1995) The following are also members of the Committee: Mrs Sylvia Reynolds, B.S.B.I. Council Representative Mr Paul Corbett, Department of the Environment (Northern Ireland) Representative Dr Brian S. Rushton, co-opted October, 1992 Irish Botanical News is published by the Committee for Ireland, Botanical Society of the British Isles and edited by Dr B.S. Rushton. © Dr B.S. Rushton and the authors of individual articles, 1993. The cover illustration is of representative leaves of Plantago coronopus L. from two geographical areas, the north coast of Ireland and inland areas of England. The leaves are derived from plants grown from seed and kept under identical greenhouse conditions. 2 CONTENTS Editorial ..........................................................................................…………. 4 Biological recording in Northern Ireland – The Northern Ireland Biological Records Centre (N.I.B.R.C.). D. Mitchel .............................5 Getting to know RECORDER – a user’s experience.
  • Flora of Ireland

    Flora of Ireland

    Flora of Ireland [email protected] How did the flora get here? • Refugium • Land bridges • Introduced by Man • Wind & birds Recolonisation •Some of the early trees e.g. pioneer willows and birches of the post-glacial tundra, arrived as tiny seeds floating in the wind. •Birds e.g. pigeons and crows spread heavier seeds. •High canopy woodland trees such as pine, elm and oak, crept north at a few metres a year, starting as far away as Spain. •Scots Pine arrived south-west 9,500 years ago, but Oak and Elm took several centuries longer. Species Diversity Vascular plant flora: •France 4,500 spp. •Britain 1,172 spp. •Belgium 1,140 spp. •Ireland 815 spp. 375 Absent Plants from Ireland but in Britain? Examination… •74 are confined to SE England: Dry hot summers •38 avoid the mountainous NW: wetter, acidic soils •45 are Highland species •32 are rare plants in Britain Leaving: 186 species absent from Ireland. Why? Ireland has 16 spp. NOT found in Britain but which are found on Continental Europe or in North America: •Mediterranean species: e.g. Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo), Kerry Lily (Simethis planifolia) & St. Daboecs Heath west Ireland, France, Spain) -‘The Lusitanian Species’ •Atlantic species: e.g. St. Patrick's cabbage (Saxifraga spathularis) •American species: e.g. Irish Lady’s Tresses (Spiranthes romanzoffiana) •Alpines: e.g. Spring Sandwort (Minuartia recurva) Lusitanian Species Kerry Lily Ireland has a mild climate with high rainfall and relatively little frost and this influences the species of wildflowers growing here. Habitats in Ireland •Aquatic • Bog, Fen and Heath • Coastal • Limestone • Urban • Waterside • Woodland Flora of Bogs Absorbing rainwater nutrients As the acidic soil of bogs have few nutrients, some What are bog conditions? bog mosses have adapted to absorbing nutrients from rainwater.
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24

    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24

    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
  • Ireland's Biodiversity in 2010

    Ireland's Biodiversity in 2010

    Biodiversity in 2010 State of Knowledge Ireland’s Biodiversity in 2010: State of Knowledge Editors: Úna FitzPatrick, Eugenie Regan and Liam Lysaght Citation: FitzPatrick, Ú., Regan, E. and Lysaght, L. (editors)(2010) Ireland’s Biodiversity in 2010: State of Knowledge. National Biodiversity Data Centre, Waterford. © National Biodiversity Data Centre 2010 ISBN 978-1-906304-15-7 Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 3 Habitats (non-marine) 7 Vegetation 8 Fungi 9 Lichens 11 Bryophytes 12 Algae 13 Vascular plants 15 Non-insect invertebrates 17 Insects 21 Tunicates & lancelets 24 Marine fishes 25 Freshwater fishes 27 Amphibians & reptiles 29 Birds 31 Land mammals 33 Bats 34 Marine mammals 35 References 36 Appendix 41 The National Biodiversity Data Centre is an initiative of the Heritage Council and is operated under a service level agreement by Compass Informatics. The Centre is funded by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. Foreword Dr Liam Lysaght Ireland, along with its EU partners, agreed to ‘Halt biodiversity loss by 2010’. Before we can halt biodiversity loss, we need to have some understanding of what that biodiversity resource is. As a contribution to this target, and to mark International Year of Biodiversity 2010, the National Biodiversity Data Centre set out to produce an overview of the state of knowledge on Ireland’s biodiversity. The scope of this task relates only to knowledge on what species and habitats occur in Ireland, how they are distributed, and how their range and/or populations are changing. Ecosystem function and conservation management are outside the remit of the Centre thus are not addressed in this document.
  • Paludella Squarrosa Observed As a Sub-Fossil in Fens of the Semois Valley

    Paludella Squarrosa Observed As a Sub-Fossil in Fens of the Semois Valley

    Paludella squarrosa observed as a sub-fossil in fens of the Semois Valley (Belgium) Jean-Marc Couvreur Département de l’Etude du Milieu Naturel et Agricole, Service Public de Wallonie, Gembloux, Belgium [[email protected]] Photographs by the author. Résumé. – Découverte de Paludella squarrosa sub-fossile dans la tourbe des marais alcalins de la vallée de la Semois (Belgique). Lors d’opérations de carottage et d’analyse de tourbe réalisées en 2017 dans les marais de la Semois, des fragments des mousses Tomen- typnum nitens (Hedw.) Loeske et Paludella squarrosa (Hedw.) Brid. ont été trouvés; il est très probable que ces fragments datent d’une époque comprise entre 2.000 et 5.000 B.P. La seconde espèce ne fait pas partie de la bryoflore belge actuelle et n’avait également jamais été trouvée à l’état sub-fossile en Belgique. Par contre elle a déjà été trouvée à l’état sub- fossile ailleurs en Europe et dans le monde. Samenvatting. – Een subfossiele vondst van Paludella squarrosa in veen in de vallei van de Semois (België). In de kernen van boringen in veengebieden in de Semoisvallei, uitgevoerd in 2017, werden fragmenten gevonden van de mossoorten Tomentypnum nitens (Hedw.) Loeske en Paludella squarrosa (Hedw.) Brid.; ze dateren vermoedelijk van ca. 2.000 tot 5.000 B.P. De tweede soort maakt geen deel uit van de recente Belgische mosflora en subfossiel materiaal ervan werd niet eerder in België aangetroffen. Evenmin waren tot nog toe subfossiele vondsten bekend. Introduction analysis. This layer was found at a depth of 40, 70 and 100 cm in the three Fouches cores, at a depth of 80 cm in the In the framework of the restoration of areas of the rich-fen Sampont core and at a depth of 50 cm in the Heinsch core.
  • <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses

    <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12547 Evolution of niche preference in Sphagnum peat mosses Matthew G. Johnson,1,2,3 Gustaf Granath,4,5,6 Teemu Tahvanainen, 7 Remy Pouliot,8 Hans K. Stenøien,9 Line Rochefort,8 Hakan˚ Rydin,4 and A. Jonathan Shaw1 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 2Current Address: Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, Illinois 60022 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden 7Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland 8Department of Plant Sciences and Northern Research Center (CEN), Laval University Quebec, Canada 9Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Museum, Trondheim, Norway Received March 26, 2014 Accepted September 23, 2014 Peat mosses (Sphagnum)areecosystemengineers—speciesinborealpeatlandssimultaneouslycreateandinhabitnarrowhabitat preferences along two microhabitat gradients: an ionic gradient and a hydrological hummock–hollow gradient. In this article, we demonstrate the connections between microhabitat preference and phylogeny in Sphagnum.Usingadatasetof39speciesof Sphagnum,withan18-locusDNAalignmentandanecologicaldatasetencompassingthreelargepublishedstudies,wetested
  • THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants

    THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants

    THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants T.G.F.Curtis & H.N. McGough Wildlife Service Ireland DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE 1988 ISBN 0 7076 0032 4 This version of the Red Data Book was scanned from the original book. The original book is A5-format, with 168 pages. Some changes have been made as follows: NOMENCLATURE has been updated, with the name used in the 1988 edition in brackets. Irish Names and family names have also been added. STATUS: There have been three Flora Protection Orders (1980, 1987, 1999) to date. If a species is currently protected (i.e. 1999) this is stated as PROTECTED, if it was previously protected, the year(s) of the relevant orders are given. IUCN categories have been updated as follows: EN to CR, V to EN, R to V. The original (1988) rating is given in brackets thus: “CR (EN)”. This takes account of the fact that a rare plant is not necessarily threatened. The European IUCN rating was given in the original book, here it is changed to the UK IUCN category as given in the 2005 Red Data Book listing. MAPS and APPENDIX have not been reproduced here. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are most grateful to the following for their help in the preparation of the Irish Red Data Book:- Christine Leon, CMC, Kew for writing the Preface to this Red Data Book and for helpful discussions on the European aspects of rare plant conservation; Edwin Wymer, who designed the cover and who, as part of his contract duties in the Wildlife Service, organised the computer applications to the data in an efficient and thorough manner.
  • New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By

    New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By

    New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited by: Stephen M. Young and Troy W. Weldy This list is also published at the website: www.nynhp.org For more information, suggestions or comments about this list, please contact: Stephen M. Young, Program Botanist New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 518-402-8951 Fax 518-402-8925 E-mail: [email protected] To report sightings of rare species, contact our office or fill out and mail us the Natural Heritage reporting form provided at the end of this publication. The New York Natural Heritage Program is a partnership with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and by The Nature Conservancy. Major support comes from the NYS Biodiversity Research Institute, the Environmental Protection Fund, and Return a Gift to Wildlife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... Page ii Why is the list published? What does the list contain? How is the information compiled? How does the list change? Why are plants rare? Why protect rare plants? Explanation of categories.................................................................................................................... Page iv Explanation of Heritage ranks and codes............................................................................................ Page iv Global rank State rank Taxon rank Double ranks Explanation of plant
  • (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, Lilyrlewis@Gmail.Com

    (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, [email protected]

    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 5-7-2015 Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Lewis, Lily Roberta, "Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae)." (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 747. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/747 Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis, PhD University of Connecticut, 2015 Many plants have geographic disjunctions, with one of the more rare, yet extreme being the amphitropical, or bipolar disjunction. Bryophytes (namely mosses and liverworts) exhibit this pattern more frequently relative to other groups of plants and typically at or below the level of species. The processes that have shaped the amphitropical disjunction have been infrequently investigated, with notably a near absence of studies focusing on mosses. This dissertation explores the amphitropical disjunction in the dung moss Tetraplodon, with a special emphasis on the origin of the southernmost South American endemic T. fuegianus. Chapter 1 delimits three major lineages within Tetraplodon with distinct yet overlapping geographic ranges, including an amphitropical lineage containing the southernmost South American endemic T. fuegianus. Based on molecular divergence date estimation and phylogenetic topology, the American amphitropical disjunction is traced to a single direct long-distance dispersal event across the tropics. Chapter 2 provides the first evidence supporting the role of migratory shore birds in dispersing bryophytes, as well as other plant, fungal, and algal diaspores across the tropics.
  • (A)Sexual Life of Liverworts

    (A)Sexual Life of Liverworts

    School of Doctoral Studies in Biological Sciences University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Faculty of Science (A)sexual Life of Liverworts Ph.D. Thesis Mgr. Eva Holá Supervisor: Mgr. Jan Kučera, Ph.D. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice České Budějovice 2015 This thesis should be cited as: Holá E., 2015: (A)sexual Life of Liverworts. Ph.D. Thesis Series, No. 3. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, School of Doctoral Studies in Biological Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 108 pp. Annotation This thesis comprises of two published papers and one accepted manuscript, focused on various aspects of liverwort reproduction. Treated aspects include patterns of asexual reproduction, sex ratio and sex-specific pattern in vegetative growth, and patterns of genetic variation and spatial genetic structure of populations differing in availability of substrate on localities and the population connectivity, and consequently in size, density, and prevailing reproductive mode. These characteristics were studied on representatives of the family Scapaniaceae s.l., belonging to the largest liverwort order Jungermanniales. The results showed that asexual propagules were formed and present in course of the whole growing season and can be considered as a sufficient substitution for sexual reproduction. In contrast with the female-biased sex ratio observed earlier in most dioicous bryophytes, unexpectedly high male-biased sex ratio was observed in the aquatic liverwort, which was speculated to represent a strategy to overcome sperm dilution in aquatic environment. In addition, no size differences between female and male shoots were detected, although the evidence for higher cost of sexual reproduction in females was found.