Information Classification: PUBLIC

Report to: Mike Eastwood Countryside Access Team Leader, for Approval of recommendation

Date: 27th January 2021

Title: The Commons Act 2006 Section 8 Apportionment of a right of common

The Commons Registration () Regulations 2014

Application number 2995

Divisions Affected

Author: Martin Wright Role: Commons and Greens Registration Officer

Contact: Tel: 01872 224773 E-mail: mwright@.gov.uk

Decision:

The application for the apportionment of a right of common is granted.

- 1 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

1. Introduction:

Cornwall Council has a duty under Section 4 of the Commons Act 2006 to keep a register of common land and a register of town and village greens. also has a duty under paragraph 26 of the Commons Registration (England) Regulations 2014 to determine applications to amend the registers of common land and town and village greens, unless the registration authority has an interest in the outcome of the application such that there is unlikely to be confidence in the authority’s ability impartially to determine it.

Commons Registration Application number 2995 was made by Parnalls, Solicitors, on behalf of their clients as owners of parts of the estate of the late Mr John Northey of Hawkes Ground and land at West Bowithick.

This report examines the evidence for and against whether the application meets the statutory tests set out in section 8 of the Commons Act 2006.

The report has been prepared to be presented to a delegated officer. The delegated decision is to consider whether to accept, refuse or refer the matter to an independent inspector to make a recommendation to grant or refuse the application.

2. Background and Corporate Objectives:

The legislative background is for the applicant to show that: • An application must accompany any application (“the primary application”) which (a) is made under (i) section 7, 11 or 13 of the 2006 Act; (ii) paragraph 1(6)(b) or 3(7)(b) of Schedule 1 to the 2006 Act; or (iii) paragraph 8 of this Schedule; and (b) relates to only a part of a right of common; or • May be made in any other case in which a right of common is attached to land of which the ownership divided into separate titles amongst two or more persons; • The application can only be made by an owner of any part of the land to which the right of common is attached, or by two or more such owners acting jointly; • The application must include evidence of the capacity of the applicant to make the application, the numbers of the register unit and the rights section entry for the right of common to which the application relates; • A description and details of the ownership of the land belonging to the applicant or (as the case may be) applicants, in the case of an application permitted to be made under sub-paragraph 2. • A calculation as to what constitutes a rateable apportionment of the right of common between the land in respect of which a description and details of ownership are required by paragraph (c) and any remaining land to which the right of common is attached;

- 2 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

• In the case of applications made by two or more owners of different parts of the land, a description of the portions attaching to the part of each such applicant; • and for the registration authority to comply with section 27 of the Commons Registration (England) Regulations 2014 – Method of determining applications and proposals.

3. Decision and Supporting Information (Including Options):

As Cornwall Council has no interest in the outcome of the application, all parties can be confident that the registration authority can impartially determine the application, and there is no need to refer the application to the Planning Inspectorate for determination, as would otherwise be the case.

The options available to the registration authority are to: i grant the application; ii refuse the application; or iii refer the application to an independent inspector to recommend granting or refusing the application.

It is recommended that the available evidence is sufficient for the Council to grant the application. Regulation 27(7)(a) requires that an application cannot be granted without first offering any objector an opportunity to make oral representations.

4. Contributions to Corporate Priorities:

In determining the application the Council is performing its statutory duty set out in sections 6 to 17, 19 and 22 of the Commons Act 2006 to determine applications seeking to amend the registers of common land and of town and village greens.

5. Financial Implications and Budget:

The process of determining whether the application is granted or refused is met from the application fee.

6. Other Resourcing Implications:

None.

7. Legal Implications:

Cornwall Council has a statutory duty set out in paragraph 26 of the Commons Registration (England) Regulations 2014 to determine applications to amend the registers of common land and town and village greens.

- 3 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

The Council’s Scheme of Delegation, states at paragraph: 1.1: “Each Strategic Director has delegated to them power to act on behalf of the Council in relation to any matters within the service areas for which they are responsible … subject to the following overriding provision: Any action by a Strategic Director under delegated powers shall be in accordance with … (g) the requirements of the relevant legislation.” 1.5: “Any power conferred upon a Strategic Director may be exercised by an officer authorised, generally or specifically for that purpose, either orally or in writing.” 3.7: “The registration of common land or town and village greens and the registration of the variation of rights of common as set out in Schedule 1 to the Functions Regulations and the determination of applications for registration of village greens is delegated to the Strategic Director with responsibility for the Environment function, following consultation with the Divisional Member(s).”

8. Equality Impact Assessment:

It is not considered that an Equality Impact Assessment is required or that there is likely to be any equality impact as a consequence of this decision.

9. Significant risks:

Should the Council make a decision which is opposed there may be a risk of judicial review. These costs can be significant and can represent a financial risk to the Council, though this should not allow this information to influence the decision about whether the application should be granted or refused, as such decision should be based on the evidence before it.

10. Consultation including Overview and Scrutiny Committee and Local Member Representation:

10.1 Overview and Scrutiny Consultation/Comments: As this is a regulatory matter and not a matter of strategic importance the Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee has not been consulted.

10.2 Local Division Member Comments: Cllr Rob Rotchell has been consulted and made no comment.

Appendices: None

Background Papers: All papers relating to this application [No. 2995].

- 4 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

11. BACKGROUND

11.1 An Application was received on the 5th February 2020 from Parnalls, Solicitors, for the apportionment of a right of common under section 8 of the Commons Act 2006, in respect of land at Hawksground and West Bowithick.

11.2 Paragraph 16 of the Commons Registration Regulations 2014 requires an application to be made in accordance with, amongst other things, Schedule 4 of the Regulations. Section 3 of Schedule 4 of the Regulations refers to applications made under section 8.

11.3 The following describes where the application meets and does not meet the legislative requirements for an apportionment of rights of common. For an application to be successful it must meet all of the legislative requirements. Failure to meet one of the legislative requirements will result in the whole of the application being refused.

- 5 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS

Schedule 4(3)(1) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 12 ‘An application for the purposes of section 8 of the 2006 Act (in relation to the apportionment of a right of common which is attached to land) must accompany any application (“the primary application”) which (a) is made under (i) section 7, 11 or 13 of the 2006 Act; (ii) paragraph 1(6)(b) or 3(7)(b) of Schedule 1 to the 2006 Act; or (iii) paragraph 8 of this Schedule; and (b) relates to only a part of a right of common.’

It is confirmed that application 2995 does not accompany a primary application – please see paragraph below.

Schedule 4(3)(2) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 13 ‘An application for the purposes of section 8 of the 2006 Act may be made in any other case in which a right of common is attached to land of which the ownership is divided into separate titles amongst two or more persons.’

It is confirmed that application 2995 relates to where the ownership of the dominant tenement is divided into separate titles amongst four interested persons/parties.

Schedule 4(3)(3)(a) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 14 ‘The application may only be made in the case of an application required to be made by sub-paragraph (1), by the person (and if more than one, by all such persons) by whom the primary application is made.’

It is confirmed that sub paragraph (1) is not relevant to this application.

Schedule 4(3)(3)(b) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 15 ‘The application may only be made in the case of an application permitted to be made by sub-paragraph (2): (i) by an owner of any part of the land to which the right of common is attached, or (ii) by two or more such owners, acting jointly.

It is confirmed that the application is made by four owners, acting jointly, under sub paragraph (2).

- 6 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

Schedule 4(4)(a) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 16 ‘The application must include evidence of the capacity of the applicant, or (as the case may be) applicants, to make the application by virtue of sub- paragraph 3 (a) or (b).’

It is confirmed that the applicant has made the application by virtue of sub-paragraph 3 (b)(ii), i.e. by two or more such owners, acting jointly.

Schedule 4(4)(b) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 17 ‘The application must include the numbers of the register unit and the rights section entry in the register of common land or town or village greens for the right of common to which the application relates.’

It is confirmed the application relates to rights entry 86 of CL 110, entry 54 of CL 193 and entry 61 of CL 194.

Schedule 4(4)(c) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 18 ‘The application must include a description, and details of the ownership of the land to which the part of the right of common which is the subject of the primary application, in the case of an application required to be made by sub-paragraph (1).’

It is confirmed that the application shows that the ownership of the land to which the right of common is attached is now in the ownership of (i) Mark Northey, (ii) Lee Northey, (iii) Diana Northey, and (iv) Mr and Mrs Andrew Vivian Ham.

Schedule 4(4)(d) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 19 ‘The application must include a calculation as to what constitutes a rateable apportionment of the right of common between the land in respect of which a description and details of ownership are required by paragraph (c) and any remaining land to which the right of common is attached’

The proportionate apportionment of the right of common attaching to the dominant tenement is calculated as follows: 19.46 cattle and 97.30 sheep to Mark Northey in respect of 64.8675% of the registered right; 2.64 cattle and 13.21 sheep to Lee Northey in respect of 8.809% of the registered right; 2.49 cattle and 12.44 sheep to Diana Northey in respect of 8.293% of the registered right; and 5.41 cattle and 27.05 sheep to Mr & Mrs A V Ham in respect of 18.0305% of the registered right.

Schedule 4(4)(e) of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 20 ‘The application must include in the case of applications made by two or more owners of different parts of the land, a description of the portions attaching to the part of each such applicant.’

- 7 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

It is confirmed that the applicant has supplied a map showing those parts of the original dominant tenement in different ownerships.

21 Representations

It is confirmed that no representations were received in respect of the proposed apportionment.

Section 26 of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 – Responsibility for Determining Applications

22 26(1)(a) ‘An application made in accordance with these Regulations must be determined by the registration authority to which it was made … 26(2) A registration authority must refer to the Planning Inspectorate for determination by it … 26(3) Where the registration authority has an interest in the outcome of the application or proposal such that there is unlikely to be confidence in the authority’s ability impartially to determine it, or where a person having a legal interest in the land the subject of an application or proposal (or someone acting on behalf of such a person) has made (and not subsequently withdrawn) representations amounting to an objection in respect of the application

It is confirmed that as no one with a legal interest has objected to the application, and the Council does not have an interest in the land, it falls upon the registration authority to determine the application.

Section 27 of the Commons Registration (Eng.) Regulations 2014 - Method of Determining Applications

23 The Commons Regulations (England) Regulations 2014 states that:

27(1) The determining authority must, in determining any application or proposal, take into account: (d) any oral representations made by any person in accordance with paragraph (7) 27(6) Paragraph (7) applies in relation to any application which the determining authority decides to determine without holding a public inquiry or hearing in accordance with regulation 32. 27(7) the determining authority: (a) May not refuse an application without first offering the applicant an opportunity to make oral representations; and (b) May not grant or refuse an application without first offering any person (other than the applicant) for whom the grant or refusal would represent a determination of that person’s civil rights an opportunity to make oral representations.

- 8 -

Information Classification: PUBLIC

The Registration Authority has shared the contents of a preliminary decision, along similar lines to this decision, with the interested parties and local member. As there are no representations, there is no need to hear oral representations.

24 Conclusion For an application to succeed it must satisfy all of the legislative criteria for an apportionment of the registered right.

25 Decision

The registration authority is satisfied that for the reasons stated above, the legislative criteria has been met, and the application is granted.

Name: Mike Eastwood

Title: Countryside Access Team Leader

Date: 28th January 2021

26 Supporting Information

Application 2995

27 Background Papers:

The Commons Act 2006: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/26/contents

The Commons Registration (England) Regulations 2014: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/3038/contents/made

Guidance to commons registration authorities and the Planning Inspectorate for the pioneer implementation (version 2.0, December 2014) (Defra) https://www.gov.uk/common-land-management-protection-and-registering-to- use (Scroll down to heading: Pioneer documents including guidance and statutory instruments)

- 9 -