DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 American Society of Naturalists Awards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 American Society of Naturalists Awards 2019 American Society of Naturalists Awards Sewall Wright Award Jonathan B. Losos The Sewall Wright Award, established in 1991, is given annu- Jonathan has made numerous other fundamental contribu- ally and honors a senior but still active investigator who is tionstothestudyofadaptiveradiationandbiodiversity,in- making fundamental contributions to the goals of the Amer- cluding the evolutionary genetics of biological invasions. How- ican Society of Naturalists, namely, promoting the conceptual ever, his influence is not restricted solely to studies published unification of the biological sciences. The 2019 Sewall Wright in the primary scientific literature. For example, he is a coau- Award honors Jonathan B. Losos, William H. Danforth Dis- thor of the widely used textbook Biology (Raven et al., McGraw- tinguished University Professor at Washington University Hill) and has also published books and articles targeted to- and director of the Living Earth Collaborative, a collaboration ward the more general reader, the latest being the beautiful among Washington University, the Missouri Botanical Gar- and highly readable book Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, den, and the Saint Louis Zoo. and the Future of Evolution (Penguin Random House, 2017). Jonathan is known for his integrative approach to the Jonathan served as president of the American Society of study of evolutionary diversification and for his seminal work Naturalists in 2010 and as editor-in-chief of the society’s flag- with Anolis lizards. This work spans field and laboratory stud- ship journal, The American Naturalist, from 2002 to 2006. ies of rapid evolution and includes studies of behavior, ecol- His career has taken him from his first faculty position at ogy, and phylogenetics. One of his best-known and most widely Washington University, to Harvard University as the curator cited publications is his 1998 Science article that addresses in herpetology at the university’s Museum of Comparative the enduring dichotomy between historical contingency and Zoology, and, in 2018, back again to Washington University predictability in evolutionary biology. In this study, Jonathan as the founding director of the Living Earth Collaborative. and collaborators studied Anolis lizards and elegantly demon- He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a strated that they have repeatedly and independently evolved fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences as well the same ecomorphs on different islands in the Caribbean as the recipient of the Daniel Giraud Elliot Medal, the Theo- when they are faced with the same ecological conditions. This dosius Dobzhansky Prize, the Edward O. Wilson Naturalist and subsequent work on the evolution of other traits, includ- Award, and the David Starr Jordan Prize. ing performance, biomechanical, and behavioral traits, in these populations have resulted in Anolis lizards literally becoming a textbook example of the repeatability of adaptive radiation Troy Day and Monica Geber,onbehalfofthe in natural populations. Sewall Wright Award Committee Edward O. Wilson Naturalist Award Anurag Agrawal The Edward O. Wilson Naturalist Award is awarded annu- was conferred upon Anurag Agrawal, James A. Perkins Pro- ally to an active midcareer scientist who has made significant fessor of Environmental Studies at Cornell University. contributions to the knowledge of a particular ecosystem or In chapter 3 of On the Origin of Species (“Struggle for Ex- group of organisms and who through this work has illumi- istence”), Charles Darwin argued that the primary cause of nated key principles of evolutionary biology and an en- evolution is antagonistic interactions among species. Anurag hanced appreciation of natural history. In 2019, the award Agrawal’s career has been built on the elaboration of this This content downloaded from 093.044.108.225 on December 24, 2019 09:45:11 AM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). argument in the context of interactions between plants and ification of plant poisons, the sequestration and modification insects. The sum of his life’s work to date is a mapping of the of the poisons in their own defense, and their direct and in- fantastic complexity of the ongoing arms race between plants direct interactions with each other as they consume a shared and their diverse chemical and physical defenses against her- resource. At a higher level of complexity, he has explored the bivores as well as the ways herbivores overcome those defenses consequences of genetic diversity among plants within a pop- and then turn them into weapons for their own protection ulation and discovered that there is safety in diversity in the against predators. To this complexity he adds the interac- form of reduced herbivore damage. At yet a higher level of tions among different species of herbivores as they compete complexity, he has characterized the evolution of defense for the common plant resource. His research program thus mechanisms across the dozens of species that comprise the captures the multidimensional network of interactions orig- genus Asclepias and characterized the relationship between inally envisioned by Darwin but with the modern dimensions the evolution of plant defenses and species diversity. of chemistry, physiology, genetics, epigenetics, phylogenetics, In spanning this range of biological organization, he has and community ecology that shape how these interactions characterized the importance of phenotypic plasticity and occur. He embodies the ideal of the E. O. Wilson Naturalist trade-offs among different defenses in shaping evolution. He Award with his characterization of this complexity, moti- has amplified our understanding of coevolution, constraint, vated by his observations of natural history. He expands on and convergence in shaping both microevolution and mac- this ideal with synthetic reviews that address the underlying roevolution. He has addressed all of these general issues in principles and create bridges among disciplines. He has gone perspectives, synthetic reviews, symposia at national and in- even further by making this science accessible to a general au- ternational conferences, and special issues in leading jour- dience in the form of a prize-winning book, Monarchs and nals, often in ways that create bridges among otherwise un- Milkweed (Princeton University Press, 2017). connected areas of endeavor. He has been a successful mentor Agrawal has sustained a special focus on milkweed (Ascle- to a large number of graduate students and postdocs who have pias spp.) and their specialized herbivores, including monarch developed independent research programs and gone on to butterflies (Danaus plexippus), aphids (Aphis spp.), and bee- successful careers of their own. His leadership in promoting tles (Tetraopes spp.). He has developed and deployed research science includes serving as a special features editor of Ecology tools for characterizing these interactions at levels that range and chairing a review of the National Science Foundation’s from microevolutionary studies of populations to macroevo- Population and Community Ecology Panel. His research has lutionary studies of the entire Asclepias genus to even broader appeared almost exclusively in the most highly ranked jour- studies of flowering plants and insects. At one level, he and his nals in our discipline and the most exclusive interdisciplin- students and collaborators have performed detailed experi- ary journals. mental studies that characterize the details of the physical Anurag Agrawal’s appreciation of natural history, transla- and chemical defenses plants mount against insects and how tion of that appreciation into diverse forms of empirical stud- the insects deal with them. This interaction includes assessing ies of adaptation and evolution, skilled communication of his the diversity of cardenolides produced by milkweed and the ideas to technical and general audiences, and leadership in enzymatic defenses of the insects. The plant side involves a the scientific community are what define him as this year’s combination of constitutive and induced responses, which recipient of the E. O. Wilson Naturalist Award. are in turn shaped by trade-offs between them and other features of the plant life cycle, such as regrowth after herbi- David Reznick (chair), Jenn Rudgers, vore damage. The insect side includes the enzymatic detox- and Joseph Travis, the Wilson Award Committee This content downloaded from 093.044.108.225 on December 24, 2019 09:45:11 AM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What the Modern Age Knew Piero Scaruffi 2004
    A History of Knowledge Oldest Knowledge What the Jews knew What the Sumerians knew What the Christians knew What the Babylonians knew Tang & Sung China What the Hittites knew What the Japanese knew What the Persians knew What the Muslims knew What the Egyptians knew The Middle Ages What the Indians knew Ming & Manchu China What the Chinese knew The Renaissance What the Greeks knew The Industrial Age What the Phoenicians knew The Victorian Age What the Romans knew The Modern World What the Barbarians knew 1 What the Modern Age knew Piero Scaruffi 2004 1919-1945: The Age of the World Wars 1946-1968: The Space Age 1969-1999: The Digital Age We are not shooting enough professors An eye for an eye makes (Lenin’s telegram) the whole world blind. (Mahatma Gandhi) "Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist.” (George Orwell, 1942) "The size of the lie is a definite factor What good fortune for governments in causing it to be believed" that the people do not think (Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf") (Adolf Hitler) 2 What the Modern Age knew • Bibliography – Paul Kennedy: The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (1987) – Jacques Barzun: "From Dawn to Decadence" (2001) – Gregory Freeze: Russia (1997) – Andrzej Paczkowski: The Black Book of Communism (1999) – Peter Hall: Cities in Civilization (1998) – Edward Kantowicz: The World In The 20th Century (1999) – Paul Johnson: Modern Times (1983) – Sheila Jones: The Quantum Ten (Oxford Univ Press, 2008) – Orlando Figes: “Natasha's Dance - A Cultural History of Russia” (2003) 3 What the Modern Age knew • Bibliography –
    [Show full text]
  • Representatives and Committees of the Society
    REPRESENTATIVES AND COMMITTEES OF THE SOCIETY Representatives of the Society in the Division of Physical Sciences of the National Research Council: 1944-1945—Marston Morse, M. H. Stone, Warren Weaver. 1945-1946—A. B. Coble, G. A. Hedlund, Saunders MacLane, Marston Morse, Oswald Veblen, Warren Weaver. 1946-1947—A. B. Coble, Saunders MacLane, John von Neumann, M. H. Stone, Oswald Veblen, Warren Weaver. 1947-1948—R. V. Churchill, M. R. Hestenes, Saunders MacLane, John von Neu­ mann, M. H. Stone, Oswald Veblen. Representatives on the Council of the American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1945—R. P. Agnew, M. R. Hestenes. 1946—Philip Franklin, C. V. Newsom. 1947—Solomon Lefschetz, G. T. Whyburn. Representatives on the Editorial Board of the Annals of Mathematics: K. 0. Friedrichs, Norman Levinson, R. L. Wilder. Representatives on the Editorial Board of the Duke Mathematical Journal: F. J. Murray, Morgan Ward. Representative on the American Year Book: G. T. Whyburn. Liaison Officer in Connection with Editorial Management of Quarterly of Applied Mathematics: Einar Hille. Colloquium Speakers: 1944—Einar Hille. 1946—Hassler Whitney. 1945—Tibor Rado. 1947—Oscar Zariski. Committee to Select Gibbs Lecturers for 1946 and 1947: L. M. Graves (Chairman), G. A. Hedlund, S. S. Wilks. Gibbs Lecturers: 1923—M. I. Pupin. 1930—E. B. Wilson. 1939—Theodore von Kârmân. 1924—Robert Henderson. 1931—P. W. Bridgman. 1941—Sewall Wright. 1925—James Pierpont. 1932—R. C. Tolman. 1943—Harry Bateman. 1926—H. B. Williams. 1934—Albeit Einstein. 1944—John von Neumann. 1927-E. W. Brown. 1935—Vannevar Bush. 1945—J. C. Slater. 1928—G.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2 Fundamental Questions: Linneaus and Kirchner
    2/1/2011 The 2 fundamental questions: y Has evolution taken pp,lace, and if so, what is the Section 4 evidence? Professor Donald McFarlane y If evolution has taken place, what is the mechanism by which it works? Lecture 2 Evolutionary Ideas Evidence for evolution before Darwin Golden Age of Exploration y Magellan’s voyage –1519 y John Ray –University of y Antonius von Leeuwenhoek ‐ microbes –1683 Cambridge (England) y “Catalog of Cambridge Plants” – 1660 –lists 626 species y 1686 –John Ray listing thousands of plant species! y In 1678, Francis Willoughby publishes “Ornithology” Linneaus and Kirchner Athenasius Kircher ~ 1675 –Noah’s ark Carl Linneaus – Sistema Naturae ‐ 1735 Ark too small!! Uses a ‘phenetic” classification – implies a phylogenetic relationship! 300 x 50 x 30 cubits ~ 135 x 20 x 13 m 1 2/1/2011 y Georges Cuvier 1769‐ 1832 y “Fixity of Species” Evidence for Evolution –prior to 1830 • Enormous diversity of life –WHY ??? JBS Haldane " The Creator, if He exists, has "an inordinate fondness for beetles" ". Evidence for Evolution –prior to 1830 Evidence for Evolution –prior to 1830 y The discovery of variation. y Comparative Anatomy. Pentadactyl limbs Evidence for Evolution –prior to Evidence for Evolution –prior to 1830 1830 y Fossils – homologies with living species y Vestigal structures Pentadactyl limbs !! 2 2/1/2011 Evidence for Evolution –prior to 1830 Evidence for Evolution –prior to 1830 y Invariance of the fossil sequence y Plant and animal breeding JBS Haldane: “I will give up my belief in evolution if someone finds a fossil rabbit in the Precambrian.” Charles Darwin Jean Baptiste Lamark y 1744‐1829 y 1809 –1882 y Organisms have the ability to adapt to their y Voyage of Beagle 1831 ‐ 1836 environments over the course of their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • Emanuele Serrelli Nathalie Gontier Editors Explanation, Interpretation
    Interdisciplinary Evolution Research 2 Emanuele Serrelli Nathalie Gontier Editors Macroevolution Explanation, Interpretation and Evidence Interdisciplinary Evolution Research Volume 2 Series editors Nathalie Gontier, Lisbon, Portugal Olga Pombo, Lisbon, Portugal [email protected] About the Series The time when only biologists studied evolution has long since passed. Accepting evolution requires us to come to terms with the fact that everything that exists must be the outcome of evolutionary processes. Today, a wide variety of academic disciplines are therefore confronted with evolutionary problems, ranging from physics and medicine, to linguistics, anthropology and sociology. Solving evolutionary problems also necessitates an inter- and transdisciplinary approach, which is why the Modern Synthesis is currently extended to include drift theory, symbiogenesis, lateral gene transfer, hybridization, epigenetics and punctuated equilibria theory. The series Interdisciplinary Evolution Research aims to provide a scholarly platform for the growing demand to examine specific evolutionary problems from the perspectives of multiple disciplines. It does not adhere to one specific academic field, one specific school of thought, or one specific evolutionary theory. Rather, books in the series thematically analyze how a variety of evolutionary fields and evolutionary theories provide insights into specific, well-defined evolutionary problems of life and the socio-cultural domain. Editors-in-chief of the series are Nathalie Gontier and Olga Pombo. The
    [Show full text]
  • Council Congratulates Exxon Education Foundation
    from.qxp 4/27/98 3:17 PM Page 1315 From the AMS ics. The Exxon Education Foundation funds programs in mathematics education, elementary and secondary school improvement, undergraduate general education, and un- dergraduate developmental education. —Timothy Goggins, AMS Development Officer AMS Task Force Receives Two Grants The AMS recently received two new grants in support of its Task Force on Excellence in Mathematical Scholarship. The Task Force is carrying out a program of focus groups, site visits, and information gathering aimed at developing (left to right) Edward Ahnert, president of the Exxon ways for mathematical sciences departments in doctoral Education Foundation, AMS President Cathleen institutions to work more effectively. With an initial grant Morawetz, and Robert Witte, senior program officer for of $50,000 from the Exxon Education Foundation, the Task Exxon. Force began its work by organizing a number of focus groups. The AMS has now received a second grant of Council Congratulates Exxon $50,000 from the Exxon Education Foundation, as well as a grant of $165,000 from the National Science Foundation. Education Foundation For further information about the work of the Task Force, see “Building Excellence in Doctoral Mathematics De- At the Summer Mathfest in Burlington in August, the AMS partments”, Notices, November/December 1995, pages Council passed a resolution congratulating the Exxon Ed- 1170–1171. ucation Foundation on its fortieth anniversary. AMS Pres- ident Cathleen Morawetz presented the resolution during —Timothy Goggins, AMS Development Officer the awards banquet to Edward Ahnert, president of the Exxon Education Foundation, and to Robert Witte, senior program officer with Exxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Tempo and Mode in Evolution WALTER M
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 6717-6720, July 1994 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a colloquium entiled "Tempo and Mode in Evoluton" organized by Walter M. Fitch and Francisco J. Ayala, held Januwy 27-29, 1994, by the National Academy of Sciences, in Irvine, CA. Tempo and mode in evolution WALTER M. FITCH AND FRANCISCO J. AYALA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717 George Gaylord Simpson said in his classic Tempo andMode The conflict between Mendelians and biometricians was in Evolution (1) that paleontologists enjoy special advantages resolved between 1918 and 1931 by the work ofR. A. Fisher over geneticists on two evolutionary topics. One general and J. B. S. Haldane in England, Sewall Wright in the United topic, suggested by the word "tempo," has to do with States, and S. S. Chetverikov in Russia. Independently of "evolutionary rates. ., their acceleration and deceleration, each other, these authors proposed theoretical models of the conditions ofexceptionally slow or rapid evolutions, and evolutionary processes which integrate Mendelian inheri- phenomena suggestive of inertia and momentum." A group tance, natural selection, and biometrical knowledge. of related problems, implied by the word "mode," involves The work of these authors, however, had a limited impact "the study of the way, manner, or pattern of evolution, a on the biology of the time, because it was formulated in study in which tempo is a basic factor, but which embraces difficult mathematical language and because it was largely considerably more than tempo" (pp. xvii-xviii). theoretical with little empirical support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Neo
    1 2 3 The structure of evolutionary theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, 4 Neo-Lamarckism and biased historical narratives about the 5 Modern Synthesis 6 7 8 9 10 Erik I. Svensson 11 12 Evolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, 13 SWEDEN 14 15 Correspondence: [email protected] 16 17 18 19 1 20 Abstract 21 The last decades have seen frequent calls for a more extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) that 22 will supposedly overcome the limitations in the current evolutionary framework with its 23 intellectual roots in the Modern Synthesis (MS). Some radical critics even want to entirely 24 abandon the current evolutionary framework, claiming that the MS (often erroneously labelled 25 “Neo-Darwinism”) is outdated, and will soon be replaced by an entirely new framework, such 26 as the Third Way of Evolution (TWE). Such criticisms are not new, but have repeatedly re- 27 surfaced every decade since the formation of the MS, and were particularly articulated by 28 developmental biologist Conrad Waddington and paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. 29 Waddington, Gould and later critics argued that the MS was too narrowly focused on genes and 30 natural selection, and that it ignored developmental processes, epigenetics, paleontology and 31 macroevolutionary phenomena. More recent critics partly recycle these old arguments and 32 argue that non-genetic inheritance, niche construction, phenotypic plasticity and developmental 33 bias necessitate major revision of evolutionary theory. Here I discuss these supposed 34 challenges, taking a historical perspective and tracing these arguments back to Waddington and 35 Gould. I dissect the old arguments by Waddington, Gould and more recent critics that the MS 36 was excessively gene centric and became increasingly “hardened” over time and narrowly 37 focused on natural selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Achilles and the Tortoise: Some Caveats to Mathematical Modeling in Biology
    Swarthmore College Works Biology Faculty Works Biology 9-2018 Achilles And The Tortoise: Some Caveats To Mathematical Modeling In Biology Scott F. Gilbert Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-biology Part of the Biology Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Scott F. Gilbert. (2018). "Achilles And The Tortoise: Some Caveats To Mathematical Modeling In Biology". Progress In Biophysics And Molecular Biology. Volume 137, 37-45. DOI: 10.1016/ j.pbiomolbio.2018.01.005 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-biology/550 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Accepted Manuscript Achilles and the tortoise: Some caveats to mathematical modeling in biology Scott F. Gilbert PII: S0079-6107(17)30221-3 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.01.005 Reference: JPBM 1311 To appear in: Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology Received Date: 5 October 2017 Revised Date: 13 January 2018 Accepted Date: 17 January 2018 Please cite this article as: Gilbert, S.F., Achilles and the tortoise: Some caveats to mathematical modeling in biology, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.pbiomolbio.2018.01.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Memoirs
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES G EORGE GAYLORD S IMPSON 1902—1984 A Biographical Memoir by E V E R E T T O LSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1991 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. GEORGE GAYLORD SIMPSON June 16, 1902-October 6, 1984 BY EVERETT C. OLSON1 EORGE GAYLORD SIMPSON'S passing in 1984 brought Gan era in vertebrate paleontology to an end. Along with Edward Drinker Cope, Henry Fairfield Osborn, and Alfred Sherwood Romer, Simpson ranks among the great paleon- tologists of our time. The intellects of several generations of students were shaped by either following or rejecting his ele- gant analyses and interpretations of evolution and the history of life. Although the "Simpson Era" had its roots in the 1920s and 1930s, it seemed to emerge fully formed and without precedent with the publication of Tempo and Mode in Evolution (delayed until 1944 by World War II), following belatedly on the heels of Quantitative Zoology (1939), which Simpson had written with Anne Roe. Both books left researchers in a va- riety of fields pondering and often revising, conceptual bases 1 Although I had earlier written a memorial to George Gaylord Simpson for the Geological Society of America, I agreed to prepare a more intimate and more per- sonal essay for the National Academy of Sciences Biographical Memoirs. The more objective accounts of his life include the essay mentioned above (Memorial Series, Geological Society of America, 1985) and the essay by Bobb Schaeffer and Malcolm McKenna (News Bulletin, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research Hollingsworth, J
    www.ssoar.info Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: a case study of excellence in biomedical research Hollingsworth, J. Rogers Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: SSG Sozialwissenschaften, USB Köln Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, J. R. (2002). Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: a case study of excellence in biomedical research. (Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 02-003). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-112976 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed
    [Show full text]
  • SEWALL WRIGHT December 21, 1889-March 3, 1988
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES S E W A L L W R I G H T 1889—1988 A Biographical Memoir by J A M E S F . CRO W Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1994 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. SEWALL WRIGHT December 21, 1889-March 3, 1988 BY JAMES F. CROW HE MATHEMATICAL THEORY of evolution and the science of Tpopulation genetics began with, and for a generation was almost totally dominated by, three men: R. A. Fisher, J. B. S. Haldane, and Sewall Wright. Wright's unique contri- bution was his "shifting balance theory," which holds that the best opportunity for evolutionary progress is afforded by a large population comprising many partially isolated local groups. Within each group a certain amount of trial and error experimentation can take place, and successful combinations can spread throughout the population. Al- though the theory remains controversial, it has been very popular and influential in the biological community. Wright also developed much of the theory of inbreeding (his coefficient of inbreeding is standard material in el- ementary textbooks) and the genetics of quantitative traits. In addition, he was a pioneer in physiological genetics and was uniquely responsible for the developmental and coat- color genetics of guinea pigs. Wright's method of path analysis, originally used mainly by animal breeders, has be- come a standard statistical technique in the social sciences. Wright was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1934.
    [Show full text]