Treatments for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Effectiveness and Value

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treatments for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Effectiveness and Value Treatments for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Effectiveness and Value Supplemental Materials November 30, 2020 Prepared for ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2020 Table of Contents A. Background: Supplemental Information ........................................................................................... 1 A1. Definitions .................................................................................................................................... 1 A2. Potential Cost-Saving Measures .................................................................................................. 1 B. Patient Perspectives: Supplemental Information .............................................................................. 3 B1. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 3 C. Clinical Guidelines .............................................................................................................................. 4 D. Comparative Clinical Effectiveness: Supplemental Information ....................................................... 5 D1. Detailed Methods ........................................................................................................................ 5 D2. Supplemental Results ................................................................................................................ 13 D3. Evidence Tables ......................................................................................................................... 48 D4. Heterogeneity and Subgroups ................................................................................................. 114 D5. Ongoing Studies ....................................................................................................................... 116 D6. Previous Systematic Reviews and Technology Assessments .................................................. 121 E. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness: Supplemental Information ........................................................... 124 E1. Detailed Methods..................................................................................................................... 124 E2. Model Inputs and Assumptions ............................................................................................... 126 E3. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 136 E4. Sensitivity Analyses .................................................................................................................. 136 E5. Scenario Analyses ..................................................................................................................... 140 E6. Heterogeneity and Subgroups ................................................................................................. 142 E7. Model Validation ...................................................................................................................... 142 F. Potential Other Benefits and Contextual Considerations .............................................................. 144 G. Potential Budget Impact: Supplemental Information ................................................................... 146 Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 146 References ......................................................................................................................................... 147 Evidence Table References ................................................................................................................ 154 ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2020 A. Background: Supplemental Information A1. Definitions Anemia is defined as “a condition in which the number of red blood cells or their oxygen-carrying capacity is insufficient to meet physiological needs.”1 In anemia, insufficient numbers of circulating red blood cells or inadequate quantities of iron or functional hemoglobin (Hb) are available to transport and release oxygen to tissues. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines define anemia as a Hb level of <12 g/dL in females and <13 g/dL in adult males. However, this definition does not provide goals of treatment for different patients’ groups.2,3 Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function over time. The definition and classification of CKD guidelines were established and endorsed by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) and the international KDIGO guideline group.4-7 CKD is defined by the presence of kidney damage or decreased kidney function for three or more months.8 Decreased kidney function refers to a decreased in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which is usually estimated (eGFR) using serum creatinine and one of several available equations.9-11 Patients who are diagnosed with CKD can be categorized into different stages according to the cause, their GFR (six G-stages; G-I: ≥90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, G-II: 60-89, G-IIIa: 45-59, G-IIIb: 30-44, G-IV: 15-29, G-V: <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and the amount of albumin or protein in the urine (three A-stages; A-1: <30, A-2: 30-299, and A-3: ≤300 mg/g). Additionally, patients with CKD can advance from being dialysis independent (DI-CKD) to renal failure (also known as end-stage kidney disease [ESKD]), which is defined as severely reduced kidney function or treatment with dialysis (dialysis dependent [DD-CKD]) or transplantation. Risk factors for CKD include genetic or sociodemographic predisposition, or the presence of diseases that can initiate and propagate kidney disease. A2. Potential Cost-Saving Measures ICER includes in its reports information on wasteful or lower-value services in the same clinical area that could be reduced or eliminated to create headroom in health care budgets for higher-value innovative services (for more information, see https://icer-review.org/final-vaf-2017-2019/). These services are ones that would not be directly affected by roxadustat (e.g., reduction in blood transfusion), as these services will be captured in the economic model. Rather, we are seeking services used in the current management of CKD beyond the potential offsets that arise from a new intervention. During stakeholder engagement and public comment periods, ICER encouraged all stakeholders to suggest services (including treatments and mechanisms of care) currently used for ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2020 Page 1 Supplemental Materials – Treatments for Anemia in CKD Return to Table of Contents patients with CKD that could be reduced, eliminated, or made more efficient. No suggestions were received. ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2020 Page 2 Supplemental Materials – Treatments for Anemia in CKD Return to Table of Contents B. Patient Perspectives: Supplemental Information B1. Methods ICER engaged with patients with CKD (DI-CKD, DD-CKD, and post-transplant), caregivers, representatives from professional and advocacy organizations, and clinical experts to understand the specific challenges associated with ongoing management of anemia in CKD from the patient perspective. ICER engaged with these groups using different platforms including webinars, one-on- one meetings, group meetings, and written communication. ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2020 Page 3 Supplemental Materials – Treatments for Anemia in CKD Return to Table of Contents C. Clinical Guidelines Multiple organizations have issued guidelines about management of anemia in CKD. However, most of these guidelines are out of date and do not include roxadustat or any other HIF-PH inhibitors as potential treatment options. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes In 2012, KDIGO issued an anemia guideline, providing recommendations on treatment including the use of iron agents and ESAs.12 Since then, KDIGO convened a Controversy Conference in December 2019 and had been planning a second one in 2020. These conferences aim to review the latest evidence and assess change implications for the 2012 KDIGO anemia guideline. Given that studies of the effects of HIF-PH inhibitors were still in progress, the first conference was focused on iron and target iron therapeutic agents. The second conference will be focused on ESAs and HIF-PH inhibitors; however, the conference has been postponed indefinitely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) In 2015, NICE published their guidelines about anemia management in CKD, which did not include guidance about HIF-PH inhibitors.13 Since then, NICE has conducted an update of the evidence in 2017 and concluded that there was no new evidence to issue recommendations about HIF-PH inhibitors as larger trials were underway. NICE was planning a scoping workshop in preparation for conducting an appraisal about roxadustat in March 2020, which was cancelled due to updates about the timing of the regulatory review. ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2020 Page 4 Supplemental Materials – Treatments for Anemia in CKD Return to Table of Contents D. Comparative Clinical Effectiveness: Supplemental Information D1. Detailed Methods Population, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, Timing, and Settings Framework (PICOTS)
Recommended publications
  • Us Anti-Doping Agency
    2019U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WALLET CARDEXAMPLES OF PROHIBITED AND PERMITTED SUBSTANCES AND METHODS Effective Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2019 CATEGORIES OF SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) • Non-Approved Substances: investigational drugs and pharmaceuticals with no approval by a governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use. • Anabolic Agents: androstenediol, androstenedione, bolasterone, boldenone, clenbuterol, danazol, desoxymethyltestosterone (madol), dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT), Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA , Intrarosa) and its prohormones, drostanolone, epitestosterone, methasterone, methyl-1-testosterone, methyltestosterone (Covaryx, EEMT, Est Estrogens-methyltest DS, Methitest), nandrolone, oxandrolone, prostanozol, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (enobosarm, (ostarine, MK-2866), andarine, LGD-4033, RAD-140). stanozolol, testosterone and its metabolites or isomers (Androgel), THG, tibolone, trenbolone, zeranol, zilpaterol, and similar substances. • Beta-2 Agonists: All selective and non-selective beta-2 agonists, including all optical isomers, are prohibited. Most inhaled beta-2 agonists are prohibited, including arformoterol (Brovana), fenoterol, higenamine (norcoclaurine, Tinospora crispa), indacaterol (Arcapta), levalbuterol (Xopenex), metaproternol (Alupent), orciprenaline, olodaterol (Striverdi), pirbuterol (Maxair), terbutaline (Brethaire), vilanterol (Breo). The only exceptions are albuterol, formoterol, and salmeterol by a metered-dose inhaler when used
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evidence Report
    Treatments for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Effectiveness and Value Final Evidence Report March 5, 2021 Prepared for ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2021 ICER Staff and Consultants University of Washington Modeling Group Reem A. Mustafa, MD, MPH, PhD Lisa Bloudek, PharmD, MS Associate Professor of Medicine Senior Research Scientist Director, Outcomes and Implementation Research University of Washington University of Kansas Medical Center Josh J. Carlson, PhD, MPH Grace Fox, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Research Lead University of Washington Institute for Clinical and Economic Review The role of the University of Washington is limited to Jonathan D. Campbell, PhD, MS the development of the cost-effectiveness model, and Senior Vice President for Health Economics the resulting ICER report does not necessarily Institute for Clinical and Economic Review represent the views of the University of Washington. Foluso Agboola, MBBS, MPH Vice President of Research Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc President Institute for Clinical and Economic Review David M. Rind, MD, MSc Chief Medical Officer Institute for Clinical and Economic Review None of the above authors disclosed any conflicts of interest. DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 5, 2021 How to cite this document: Mustafa RA, Bloudek L, Fox G, Carlson JJ, Campbell JD, Agboola F, Pearson SD, Rind DM. Treatments for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Effectiveness and Value; Final Evidence Report. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, March 5, 2021. https://icer.org/assessment/anemia-in-chronic-kidney-disease-2021/#timeline. Reem Mustafa served as the lead author for the report. Grace Fox led the systematic review and authorship of the comparative clinical effectiveness section in collaboration with Foluso Agboola and Noemi Fluetsch.
    [Show full text]
  • Roxadustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases: a Meta-Analysis
    www.aging-us.com AGING 2021, Vol. 13, No. 13 Research Paper Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney diseases: a meta-analysis Li Zhang1, Jie Hou1, Jia Li1, Sen-Sen Su1, Shuai Xue2 1Department of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Province, China 2Department of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Province, China Correspondence to: Shuai Xue; email: [email protected] Keywords: roxadustat, chronic kidney disease, anemia, meta-analysis Received: January 22, 2021 Accepted: May 17, 2021 Published: June 11, 2021 Copyright: © 2021 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Background: Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Treating renal anemia with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or erythropoietin analogs is effective but has side effects. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in treating CKD-induced anemia. Methods: We searched publications online and conducted a meta-analysis and calculated relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs for continuous data. Results: Of 110 articles, nine were included that contained 12 data sets and 11 randomized control trials on roxadustat. In the non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) high-dose/low-dose subgroups, the change in hemoglobin (Hb) levels was significantly higher in the roxadustat group than in the placebo group (P<0.0001, P=0.001, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Erythropoiesis and Chronic Kidney Disease–Related Anemia: from Physiology to New Therapeutic Advancements
    Received: 21 April 2018 | Revised: 18 June 2018 | Accepted: 6 July 2018 DOI: 10.1002/med.21527 REVIEW ARTICLE Erythropoiesis and chronic kidney disease–related anemia: From physiology to new therapeutic advancements Valeria Cernaro1 | Giuseppe Coppolino2 | Luca Visconti1 | Laura Rivoli3 | Antonio Lacquaniti1 | Domenico Santoro1 | Antoine Buemi4 | Saverio Loddo5 | Michele Buemi1 1Chair of Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Abstract Messina, Messina, Italy Erythropoiesis is triggered by hypoxia and is strictly 2Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Department of regulated by hormones, growth factors, cytokines, and Internal Medicine, “Pugliese‐Ciaccio” Hospital of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy vitamins to ensure an adequate oxygen delivery to all 3Unit of Nephrology, Department of Internal body cells. Abnormalities in one or more of these factors Medicine, Chivasso Hospital, Turin, Italy may induce different kinds of anemia requiring different 4Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Cliniques Universitaires Saint‐Luc, treatments. A key player in red blood cell production is Université Catholique De Louvain, Brussels, erythropoietin. It is a glycoprotein hormone, mainly Belgium 5Department of Clinical and Experimental produced by the kidneys, that promotes erythroid Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, progenitor cell survival and differentiation in the bone Italy marrow and regulates iron metabolism. A deficit in Correspondence erythropoietin synthesis is the main cause of the normo- Valeria Cernaro, Chair of Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Experimental chromic normocytic anemia frequently observed in pa- Medicine, University of Messina, Via tients with progressive chronic kidney disease. The Consolare Valeria n. 1, Messina 98124, Italy. Email: [email protected] present review summarizes the most recent findings about each step of the erythropoietic process, going from the renal oxygen sensing system to the cascade of events induced by erythropoietin through its own receptor in the bone marrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Molidustat for the Treatment of Renal Anaemia in Patients with Dialysis- Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Design and Rationale of Three Phase III Studies
    Open access Protocol BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026602 on 14 June 2019. Downloaded from Molidustat for the treatment of renal anaemia in patients with dialysis- dependent chronic kidney disease: design and rationale of three phase III studies Tadao Akizawa, 1 Megumi Taguchi,2 Yoshimi Matsuda,3 Kazuma Iekushi,2 Takashi Yamada,4 Hiroyasu Yamamoto 5 To cite: Akizawa T, Taguchi M, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Matsuda Y, et al. Molidustat Introduction New medications for anaemia associated for the treatment of renal with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are desirable, owing to anaemia in patients with ► Due to recruitment feasibility limitations, MIYABI the limitations of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), dialysis-dependent chronic Haemodialysis-Correction and MIYABI Peritoneal kidney disease: design and the current standard of care. Molidustat is a novel hypoxia- Dialysis are single-arm, open-label studies. inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates rationale of three phase ► In MIYABI Haemodialysis-Maintenance (HD-M), a III studies. BMJ Open erythropoietin production, predominately in the kidney. randomised, double-blind study, molidustat treat- 2019;9:e026602. doi:10.1136/ We report methodological details of three phase III trials, ment will be directly compared with an ESA (dar- bmjopen-2018-026602 named MolIdustat once dailY improves renal Anaemia By bepoetin alfa), the current standard of care for Inducing erythropoietin (MIYABI), designed primarily to ► Prepublication history and renal anaemia, and will build on the results of a additional material for this investigate the efficacy of molidustat therapy in adults with previous open-label phase IIb trial in patients on paper are available online.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF) Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors Induce Autophagy and Have a Protective Efect in an In-Vitro Ischaemia Model Ayesha Singh1, James W
    www.nature.com/scientificreports Corrected: Author Correction OPEN Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors induce autophagy and have a protective efect in an in-vitro ischaemia model Ayesha Singh1, James W. Wilson1, Christopher J. Schofeld 2 & Ruoli Chen 1* This study compared efects of fve hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylases (PHD) inhibitors on PC12 cells and primary rat neurons following oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD). At 100 µM, the PHD inhibitors did not cause cytotoxicity and apoptosis. MTT activity was only signifcantly reduced by FG4592 or Bayer 85–3934 in PC12 cells. The PHD inhibitors at 100 µM signifcantly increased the LC3-II/LC3-I expression ratio and downregulated p62 in PC12 cells, so did FG4592 (30 µM) and DMOG (100 µM) in neurons. HIF-1α was stabilised in PC12 cells by all the PHD inhibitors at 100 µM except for DMOG, which stabilised HIF-1α at 1 and 2 mM. In primary neurons, HIF-1α was stabilised by FG4592 (30 µM) and DMOG (100 µM). Pretreatment with the PHD inhibitors 24 hours followed by 24 hour reoxygenation prior to 6 hours OGD (0.3% O2) signifcantly reduced LDH release and increased MTT activity compared to vehicle (1% DMSO) pretreatment. In conclusion, the PHD inhibitors stabilise HIF-1α in normoxia, induce autophagy, and protect cells from a subsequent OGD insult. The new class of PHD inhibitors (FG4592, FG2216, GSK1278863, Bay85-3934) have the higher potency than DMOG. The interplay between autophagy, HIF stabilisation and neuroprotection in ischaemic stroke merits further investigation. Te hypoxia inducible transcription factors (HIF) are regulators of cellular responses to hypoxia in mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 EPHMRA ANATOMICAL
    EPHMRA ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 2020 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 "The Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products has been developed and maintained by the European Pharmaceutical Marketing Research Association (EphMRA) and is therefore the intellectual property of this Association. EphMRA's Classification Committee prepares the guidelines for this classification system and takes care for new entries, changes and improvements in consultation with the product's manufacturer. The contents of the Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products remain the copyright to EphMRA. Permission for use need not be sought and no fee is required. We would appreciate, however, the acknowledgement of EphMRA Copyright in publications etc. Users of this classification system should keep in mind that Pharmaceutical markets can be segmented according to numerous criteria." © EphMRA 2020 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 1 B BLOOD AND BLOOD FORMING ORGANS 28 C CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM 35 D DERMATOLOGICALS 50 G GENITO-URINARY SYSTEM AND SEX HORMONES 57 H SYSTEMIC HORMONAL PREPARATIONS (EXCLUDING SEX HORMONES) 65 J GENERAL ANTI-INFECTIVES SYSTEMIC 69 K HOSPITAL SOLUTIONS 84 L ANTINEOPLASTIC AND IMMUNOMODULATING AGENTS 92 M MUSCULO-SKELETAL SYSTEM 102 N NERVOUS SYSTEM 107 P PARASITOLOGY 118 R RESPIRATORY SYSTEM 120 S SENSORY ORGANS 132 T DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS 139 V VARIOUS 141 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 INTRODUCTION The Anatomical Classification was initiated in 1971 by EphMRA. It has been developed jointly by Intellus/PBIRG and EphMRA. It is a subjective method of grouping certain pharmaceutical products and does not represent any particular market, as would be the case with any other classification system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferric Citrate
    Novel aspects of anemia and iron management in renal patients with or without cardiorenal syndrome Renal Unit, King’s College Hospital, London, UK 2002 2012 Killini 2012 2008 2018 2000 2010 2004 Erythropoiesis Hepcidin system Activation of HIF under hypoxic P300conditions HIF-β HIF-2α HIF-PH HRE EPO gene Plasma HIF system Fe-Tf Erythropoietin Iron SCF, IL-1, IL-3, SCF, GM-CSF, IL-6, IL-11 IL-3 About 8 Days Pluripotent Burst-Forming Colony-Forming Proerythro- Erythro- Reticulocytes RBCs Stem Cell Unit-Erythroid Unit-Erythroid blasts blasts Cells (BFU-E) Cells (CFU-E) Outline of lecture • What‘s new in anemia management? • What‘s new in iron management? • What‘s new in patients with cardiorenal syndrome? Controversies Conference on Iron Management in CKD | March 27-30, 2014 | San Francisco, California, USA Is there anything new in relation to target haemoglobin? Hb correction with ESA therapy 15 14 13 12 11 10 Hb (g/dl) Hb 9 • Reduced transfusions • Improved QoL, esp. physical domain 8 • Improved physical capacity • Positive cardiac effects 7 6 Hb correction with ESA therapy 15 14 13 12 11 10 Hb (g/dl) Hb 9 • Reduced transfusions • ? Improved QoL / ↑exercise capacity 8 • Increased CVS events, stroke, VTE • Increased cancer-related deaths 7 6 Hb correction with ESA therapy 15 14 13 12 11 10 Hb (g/dl) Hb 9 8 7 6 Safety Concerns in the TREAT Study 10 Darbepoetin alfa 8.9§ 8 Placebo 7.5‡ 7.1 6 5.0† 4 Patients (%) Patients 2 2.6 2.0‡ 0.6 1.1 0 Stroke Venous Arterial Cancer-related thromboembolic thromboembolic mortality* event event †, p<0.001 versus placebo ‡, p=0.02 versus placebo §, p=0.04 versus placebo *Amongst patients with a history of malignancy at baseline Pfeffer MA et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Anemia of Chronic Diseases: Wider Diagnostics—Better Treatment?
    nutrients Communication Anemia of Chronic Diseases: Wider Diagnostics—Better Treatment? Michał Wici ´nski 1, Grzegorz Liczner 1, Karol Cadelski 1, Tadeusz Kołnierzak 1, Magdalena Nowaczewska 2 and Bartosz Malinowski 1,* 1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, M. Curie 9, 85-090 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] (M.W.); [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (K.C.); [email protected] (T.K.) 2 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and Laryngological Oncology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, M. Curie 9, 85-090 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 April 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020; Published: 16 June 2020 Abstract: Anemia of chronic diseases is a condition that accompanies a specific underlying disease, in which there is a decrease in hemoglobin, hematocrit and erythrocyte counts due to a complex process, usually initiated by cellular immunity mechanisms and pro-inflammatory cytokines and hepcidin. This is the second most common type of anemia after iron deficiency anemia in the world. Its severity generally correlates with the severity of the underlying disease. This disease most often coexists with chronic inflammation, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and kidney failure. Before starting treatment, one should undertake in-depth diagnostics, which includes not only assessment of complete blood count and biochemical parameters, but also severity of the underlying disease. The differential diagnosis of anemia of chronic diseases is primarily based on the exclusion of other types of anemia, in particular iron deficiency. The main features of anemia of chronic diseases include mild to moderate lowering of hemoglobin level, decreased percentage of reticulocyte count, low iron and transferrin concentration, but increased ferritin.
    [Show full text]
  • 13, 2020 Individual
    Abstracts from the 11th American Conference on Pharmacometrics ACoP11 ISSN 2688-3953 ACoP11, November 9 – 13, 2020 Individual abstracts will be posted online post meeting. For citation purposes please use the following Citation: Author names, Abstract title, ACoP11, ISSN:2688-3953, 2020, Vol 2 TUE- 001 Updated Review of Vancomycin Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses in Adults Abdullah Aljutayli1, Amélie Marsot2,3, and Fahima Nekka1,4,5 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada 2Laboratoire de suivi thérapeutique pharmacologique et pharmacocinétique, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 3Centre de recherche, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada 4 Laboratoire de Pharmacométrie, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 5Centre de recherches mathématiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Background: Vancomycin is a drug of choice in the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Nonetheless, vancomycin optimal dosage regimens have, long, been controversial owing to the large between- and within-subject variability in its population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) profile. Objectives: Our primary aim was to better inform vancomycin dosing by providing a comprehensive synthesis of PopPK analyses of vancomycin to determine the most reported models, including the various sources of variability. Methods: Systematic search for vancomycin PopPK studies was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE with a time limit from January of 2011 to May of 2019. In addition, we inspected all relevant lists of references. Results: Thirty analyses met the research criteria and were included in this review. One-compartment and two- compartment models best-described vancomycin PopPK in thirteen and fourteen studies, respectively. Further, three- compartment models were implemented in three studies to account for an additional cite of administration, i.e.
    [Show full text]