DOCSLIB.ORG

Ih-635 Managed Lanes Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ih-635 Managed Lanes Project IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL INTERPRETIVE REPORT FOR THE REFERENCE SCHEMATIC - SEGMENT A prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation Dallas District Office prepared by: Lachel Felice & Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas JUNE 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................... vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope........................................................................................ 1 1.3 Sources of Information ................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 General....................................................................................................1 1.3.2 Site Specific Investigations and Reports .................................................2 1.4 Limitations and Disclaimer ............................................................................. 4 2.0 PROJECT SETTING .........................................................................................6 2.1 General........................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Segment A Configuration ............................................................................... 6 2.3 Physiography and Regional Geology............................................................. 7 2.4 Stratigraphy.................................................................................................... 7 2.4.1 Overburden..............................................................................................7 2.4.2 Bedrock....................................................................................................9 2.5 Geologic Structure........................................................................................ 10 2.6 Groundwater Conditions from a Regional Geologic Perspective ................. 11 2.7 Regional Seismicity...................................................................................... 11 3.0 GROUND CHARACTERIZATION AND SITE CONDITIONS ..........................13 3.1 Engineering Properties of Soil and Rock...................................................... 13 3.1.1 Overburden Soils...................................................................................13 3.1.2 Bedrock..................................................................................................17 3.2 Hydrogeologic Setting .................................................................................. 26 3.2.1 Hydraulic Conductivity ...........................................................................26 3.2.2 Groundwater Elevations ........................................................................27 3.3 In Situ Stress Conditions.............................................................................. 30 3.4 Environmental Considerations ..................................................................... 30 3.5 Geologic Conditions along Segment A......................................................... 30 3.5.1 Station 67+00 to 92+00 (Josey Lane to Webb Chapel Road) ...............31 3.5.2 Station 92+00 to 130+00 (Webb Chapel to 1,800 ft West of Marsh Lane) .....................................................................................................32 3.5.3 Station 130+00 to 163+00 (1,800 ft West of Marsh Lane to 1,500 ft East of Marsh Lane) ..............................................................................32 3.5.4 Station 163+00 to 191+00/195+00 (1,500 ft East of Marsh Lane to West Mined Tunnel Portals) ..................................................................33 3.5.5 West Mined Tunnel Portals to Station 264+00 (Mined Tunnel) .............34 3.5.6 Station 264+00 to 305+00 (Mined Tunnel) ............................................35 3.5.7 Station 305+00 to 334+00 (Mined Tunnels to East Mined Tunnel Portals) ..................................................................................................35 3.5.8 Station 334+00 to 356+00 (East Mined Tunnel Portals to 700 ft West of Hillcrest Road)..........................................................................36 3.5.9 Station 356+00 to 360+00 (End Below Grade Sections to West of Hillcrest Road) .......................................................................................36 4.0 PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ................................................37 4.1 General......................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Mined Tunnels in Austin Chalk..................................................................... 37 4.3 Vertical Cuts in Austin Chalk........................................................................ 37 ii 4.3.1 DART Mockingbird Station ....................................................................37 4.3.2 Addison Airport Toll Tunnel ...................................................................38 4.4 Vertical Cuts in Eagle Ford Shale ................................................................ 39 4.4.1 President George Bush Turnpike, Carrollton Section............................39 4.4.2 President George Bush Turnpike, Las Colinas Section.........................40 4.4.3 One Main Place, Downtown Dallas .......................................................40 4.4.4 I-30 Widening, Dallas, Loop 12 to Sylvan..............................................40 4.4.5 Landfill Case History, Slope Failure.......................................................41 4.4.6 DFW Airport, Slope Failure During Construction of Utility Corridor .......41 5.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR MINED TUNNELS...................................42 5.1 General......................................................................................................... 42 5.2 Ground Response ........................................................................................ 42 5.3 Initial Ground Support .................................................................................. 43 5.3.1 Mined Tunnels and Associated Underground Structures ......................43 5.3.2 Portal Design .........................................................................................43 5.4 Final Lining Design....................................................................................... 44 5.5 Argillaceous Zones....................................................................................... 44 5.6 Bentonite Seams.......................................................................................... 44 5.7 Groundwater and Seepage Control.............................................................. 45 5.8 Combustible and Toxic Gases ..................................................................... 46 5.9 Corrosion Potential....................................................................................... 46 5.10 Recommended Additional Subsurface Investigations ................................ 46 6.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR CUT-AND-COVER TUNNEL AND U- WALL SECTIONS ...........................................................................................47 6.1 General......................................................................................................... 47 6.2 Long-term Earth Pressure Loading Basis .................................................... 47 6.2.1 At-rest Earth Pressures (Ko) in Clay and Shale .....................................47 6.2.2 Special Considerations Regarding Lateral Swell Pressures due to Swelling Clays and Clay Shales ............................................................48 6.2.3 Methods of Stabilizing Vertical Cuts in Weathered and Fresh Austin Chalk ..........................................................................................49 6.2.4 Groundwater Level at the Ground Surface ............................................50 6.2.5 Surcharge Loads ...................................................................................50 6.3 Vertical Swell Design Considerations........................................................... 50 6.4 Long-term Loading on Walls (by Station) ..................................................... 51 6.4.1 Station 67+00 to Station 92+00 (Josey Lane to Webb Chapel Road).....................................................................................................51 6.4.2 Station 92+00 to Station 130+00 (Webb Chapel to 1,800 ft West of Marsh Lane) ..........................................................................................52 6.4.3 Station 130+00 to Station 163+00 (1,800 ft West of Marsh Lane to 1,500 ft East of Marsh Lane) .................................................................52 6.4.4 Station 163+00 to Station 191+00/195+00 (1,500 ft East of Marsh Lane to West Tunnel Portals) ................................................................53 6.4.5 Station 334+00 to Station 356+00 (East Portals to 700 ft West of Hillcrest Road) .......................................................................................54 6.4.6 Station 356+00 to End Below Grade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Petroleum Potential of H Serpentine Plugs" and Associated Rocks, Central and South Texas
    BAYLOR FALL 1986 ulletin No. 44 The Petroleum Potential of H Serpentine Plugs" and Associated Rocks, Central and South Texas TRUITT F. MATTHEWS Baylor Geological Studies EDITORIAL STAFF Jean M. Spencer Jenness, M.S., Ed.ttpr environmental and medical geology CONTENTS Page O. T. Hayward, Ph.D., Advisor. Cartographic Editor Abstract .............................................................. 5 general and urban geology and what have you Introduction. .. 5 Peter M. Allen, Ph.D. Purpose ........................................................... 5 urban and environmental geology, hydrology Location .......................................................... 6 Methods .......................................................... 6 Harold H. Beaver, Ph.D. Previous works. .. 7 stratigraphy, petroleum geology Acknowledgments .................................................. 11 Regional setting of "serpentine plugs" ..................................... 11 Rena Bonem, Ph.D. Descriptive geology of "serpentine plugs" .................................. 12 paleontology, paleoecology Northern subprovince ............................................... 13 Middle subprovince ................................................. 15 William Brown, M.S. Southern subprovince ............................................... 18 structural tectonics Origin and history of "serpentine plugs" ................................... 26 Robert C. Grayson, Ph.D. Production histories of "serpentine plugs" ................................. 30 stratigraphy, conodont biostratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Depositional Environment of the Eagle Ford
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2012 Evaluation of the depositional environment of the Eagle Ford Formation using well log, seismic, and core data in the Hawkville Trough, LaSalle and McMullen counties, south Texas Zachary Paul Hendershott Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hendershott, Zachary Paul, "Evaluation of the depositional environment of the Eagle Ford Formation using well log, seismic, and core data in the Hawkville Trough, LaSalle and McMullen counties, south Texas" (2012). LSU Master's Theses. 863. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/863 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATION OF THE DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE EAGLE FORD FORMATION USING WELL LOG, SEISMIC, AND CORE DATA IN THE HAWKVILLE TROUGH, LASALLE AND MCMULLEN COUNTIES, SOUTH TEXAS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geology and Geophysics by Zachary Paul Hendershott B.S., University of the South – Sewanee, 2009 December 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair and advisor, Dr. Jeffrey Nunn, for his constant guidance and support during my academic career at LSU.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Ford Group and Associated Cenomanian–Turonian Strata, U.S
    U.S. Gulf Coast Petroleum Systems Project Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Eagle Ford Group and Associated Cenomanian–Turonian Strata, U.S. Gulf Coast, Texas, 2018 Using a geology-based assessment methodology, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated undiscovered, technically recoverable mean resources of 8.5 billion barrels of oil and 66 trillion cubic feet of gas in continuous accumulations in the Upper Cretaceous Eagle Ford Group and associated Cenomanian–Turonian strata in onshore lands of the U.S. Gulf Coast region, Texas. −102° −100° −98° −96° −94° −92° −90° EXPLANATION Introduction 32° LOUISIANA Eagle Ford Marl The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Continuous Oil AU TEXAS assessed undiscovered, technically MISSISSIPPI Submarine Plateau-Karnes Trough Continuous Oil AU recoverable hydrocarbon resources in Cenomanian–Turonian self-sourced continuous reservoirs of 30° Mudstone Continuous Oil AU the Upper Cretaceous Eagle Ford Group Eagle Ford Marl Continuous and associated Cenomanian–Turonian Gas AU Submarine Plateau–Karnes strata, which are present in the subsurface Trough Continuous Gas AU 28° across the U.S. Gulf Coast region, Texas Cenomanian–Turonian Mudstone Continuous (fig. 1). The USGS completes geology- GULF OF MEXICO Gas AU based assessments using the elements Cenomanian–Turonian 0 100 200 MILES Downdip Continuous of the total petroleum system (TPS), 26° Gas AU 0 100 200 KILOMETERS which include source rock thickness, MEXICO NM OK AR TN GA organic richness, and thermal maturity for MS AL self-sourced continuous accumulations. Base map from U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service TX LA FL Assessment units (AUs) within a TPS Map are defined by strata that share similar Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Lower Austin Chalk Secondary Porosity Using Modern
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Mapping Lower Austin Chalk Secondary Porosity Using Modern 3-D Seismic and Well Log Methods in Zavala County, Texas David Kilcoyne University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Recommended Citation Kilcoyne, David, "Mapping Lower Austin Chalk Secondary Porosity Using Modern 3-D Seismic and Well Log Methods in Zavala County, Texas" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2835. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2835 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Mapping Lower Austin Chalk Secondary Porosity Using Modern 3-D Seismic and Well Log Methods in Zavala County, Texas A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by David Joseph Kilcoyne University College Cork Bachelor of Science in Geoscience, 2016 August 2018 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Christopher L. Liner, PhD Thesis Director ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Thomas A. McGilvery, PhD Robert Liner, M.S. Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Establishing fracture distribution and porosity trends is key to successful well design in a majority of unconventional plays. The Austin Chalk has historically been referred to as an unpredictable producer due to high fracture concentration and lateral variation in stratigraphy, however recent drilling activity targeting the lower Austin Chalk has been very successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cretaceous and Tertiary Burial History, Central Texas 143
    A Publication of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies www.gcags.org L C T B H, C T Peter R. Rose 718 Yaupon Valley Rd., Austin, Texas 78746, U.S.A. ABSTRACT In Central Texas, the Balcones Fault Zone separates the Gulf Coastal Plain from the elevated Central Texas Platform, comprising the Hill Country, Llano Uplift, and Edwards Plateau provinces to the west and north. The youngest geologic for- mations common to both regions are of Albian and Cenomanian age, the thick, widespread Edwards Limestone, and the thin overlying Georgetown, Del Rio, Buda, and Eagle Ford–Boquillas formations. Younger Cretaceous and Tertiary formations that overlie the Edwards and associated formations on and beneath the Gulf Coastal Plain have no known counterparts to the west and north of the Balcones Fault Zone, owing mostly to subaerial erosion following Oligocene and Miocene uplift during Balcones faulting, and secondarily to updip stratigraphic thinning and pinchouts during the Late Cretaceous and Tertiary. This study attempts to reconstruct the burial history of the Central Texas Platform (once entirely covered by carbonates of the thick Edwards Group and thin Buda Limestone), based mostly on indirect geological evidence: (1) Regional geologic maps showing structure, isopachs and lithofacies; (2) Regional stratigraphic analysis of the Edwards Limestone and associated formations demonstrating that the Central Texas Platform was a topographic high surrounded by gentle clinoform slopes into peripheral depositional areas; (3) Analysis and projection
    [Show full text]
  • DALLAS + ARCHITECTURE + CULTURE Winter 2018 Vol. 35 No. 1
    DALLAS + ARCHITECTURE + CULTURE Winter 2018 Vol. 35 No. 1 strip COLUMNS // aiadallas.org 1 ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING IS COMPLICATED NOW. Our professional lighting consultants know the latest in lighting and can make it simple for you. P LIGHTS R FANTASTIC O P LIGHTS R FANTASTIC O LIGHTSFANTASTICPRO.COM P 2525 E. STATE HWY. 121LIGHTS • BLDG. B, SUITE 200 • LEWISVILLE,R TX 75056 • 469.568.1111 FANTASTIC O 2 COLUMNS // aiadallas.org P LIGHTS R FANTASTIC O AIA Dallas Columns Winter 2018 + Vol. 35, No. 1 strip “Doing more with less” seems to be a mantra for the 21st Century. Design work, however, doesn’t need to be either prudish or garish to be smart. Are we slowly stripping away history, meaning, and character in our community? STRIP EXPLORATION 14 The Evolution of Place What does “character” refer to when describing Dallas architecture? 18 Fixing “Strip-urbia” Are the commercial byproducts of sprawl outdated? 22 At Our Wit’s End Can a sense of humor in strip malls be the recipe for success? 28 A Strip of Pavement that Changed Texas Forever How did our nation’s first highway system transform the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex? 33 The Politics of Stripping Should public art be stripped of its historic and political meaning? Cover Illustration: Frances Yllana COLUMNS // aiadallas.org 1 Prairie View A&M University Agriculture & Business Multipurpose Building architect Overland Partners, San Antonio general contractor Linbeck, Houston Building Connections In Brick masonry contractor Camarata Masonry Systems, Houston At Prairie View A&M University’s historical gathering “We worked with Prairie View place, a clock tower now marks a center of academic A&M to design a central campus as well as social convergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Perspective on Stimulation of Unconventional Tight
    Theory and Perspective on Stimulation of Unconventional Tight Oil Reservoir in China Zhifeng Luo Professor National key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir and Exploitation; College of Oil and Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; e-mail: [email protected] Yujia Gao∗ Postgraduate College of Oil and Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500, China; e-mail:[email protected] Liqiang Zhao Professor National key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir and Exploitation; College of Oil and Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500, China; e-mail: [email protected] Pingli Liu Professor National key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir and Exploitation; College of Oil and Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500, China; e-mail: [email protected] Nianyin Li Professor National key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir and Exploitation; College of Oil and Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT China has tremendous unconventional tight oil resources which are widely distributed in lots of petroliferous basin. However, compared with North American, all the tight oil reservoirs discovered in China has its own characteristics including continental sedimentation, interbeded formation, worse reservoir physical properties and less oil reserves per unit volume, which make it much harder to stimulate. Based on thorough analysis of successful stimulation experiences in North American, taking the characteristic of China’s tight oil reservoir into consideration, this article emphasized that increasing stimulated volume must be paid attention to, what’s more, integrated fracturing technology must be adopted into tight oil reservoir stimulation to promote both production and recovery efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Scanned Documents
    / Chapter 2 THE FOSSIL RECORD OF BIRDS Storrs L. Olson Department of Vertebrate Zoology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC. I. Introduction 80 II. Archaeopteryx 85 III. Early Cretaceous Birds 87 IV. Hesperornithiformes 89 V. Ichthyornithiformes 91 VI. Other Mesozojc Birds 92 VII. Paleognathous Birds 96 A. The Problem of the Origins of Paleognathous Birds 96 B. The Fossil Record of Paleognathous Birds 104 VIII. The "Basal" Land Bird Assemblage 107 A. Opisthocomidae 109 B. Musophagidae 109 C. Cuculidae HO D. Falconidae HI E. Sagittariidae 112 F. Accipitridae 112 G. Pandionidae 114 H. Galliformes 114 1. Family Incertae Sedis Turnicidae 119 J. Columbiformes 119 K. Psittaciforines 120 L. Family Incertae Sedis Zygodactylidae 121 IX. The "Higher" Land Bird Assemblage 122 A. Coliiformes 124 B. Coraciiformes (Including Trogonidae and Galbulae) 124 C. Strigiformes 129 D. Caprimulgiformes 132 E. Apodiformes 134 F. Family Incertae Sedis Trochilidae 135 G. Order Incertae Sedis Bucerotiformes (Including Upupae) 136 H. Piciformes 138 I. Passeriformes 139 X. The Water Bird Assemblage 141 A. Gruiformes 142 B. Family Incertae Sedis Ardeidae 165 79 Avian Biology, Vol. Vlll ISBN 0-12-249408-3 80 STORES L. OLSON C. Family Incertae Sedis Podicipedidae 168 D. Charadriiformes 169 E. Anseriformes 186 F. Ciconiiformes 188 G. Pelecaniformes 192 H. Procellariiformes 208 I. Gaviiformes 212 J. Sphenisciformes 217 XI. Conclusion 217 References 218 I. Introduction Avian paleontology has long been a poor stepsister to its mammalian counterpart, a fact that may be attributed in some measure to an insufRcien- cy of qualified workers and to the absence in birds of heterodont teeth, on which the greater proportion of the fossil record of mammals is founded.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2020-3045
    U.S. Gulf Coast Petroleum Systems Project Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk and Tokio and Eutaw Formations, U.S. Gulf Coast, 2019 Using a geology-based assessment methodology, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated undiscovered, technically recoverable mean resources of 6.9 billion barrels of oil and 41.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in conventional and continuous accumulations in the Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk and Tokio and Eutaw Formations onshore and in State waters of the U.S. Gulf Coast region. Introduction Geologic Models for Assessment The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessed undiscovered, The Austin Chalk, consisting of both chalk and marl, was technically recoverable oil and gas in the Upper Cretaceous deposited on a broad, low-relief marine shelf that deepened to the (Coniacian–Santonian) Austin Chalk and Tokio and Eutaw Forma- south and west during the Coniacian–Santonian marine transgression. tions in the subsurface of the Gulf Coast from southern Texas to Landward, to the northeast, the Austin Chalk transitions into sandstone the Florida Panhandle. The Austin Chalk and related stratigraphic and mudstone of the Tokio Formation in Arkansas and Louisiana and the units present onshore and in State waters of the U.S. Gulf Coast Eutaw Formation in Mississippi and Alabama. The Tokio and Eutaw region are part of the Upper Jurassic–Cretaceous–Tertiary Composite Formations were deposited in shallow to marginal marine depositional Total Petroleum System (TPS) (Condon and Dyman, 2006). environments at the leading edge of the marine transgression. The source of hydrocarbons in Austin Chalk, Tokio, and Eutaw reservoirs 100° 98° 96° 94° 92° 90° 88° 86° varies spatially throughout the onshore Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagenesis in the Upper Cretaceous Eagle Ford Shale
    DIAGENESIS IN THE UPPER CRETACEOUS EAGLE FORD SHALE, SOUTH TEXAS by Allison Schaiberger Copyright by Allison Schaiberger (2016) All Rights Reserved A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date ______________________ Signed: ____________________________________ Allison Schaiberger Signed: ____________________________________ Dr. Steve Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Signed: ____________________________________ Dr. Stephen Enders Interim Department Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering Golden, Colorado Date ______________________ ii ABSTRACT This study utilizes three cores provided by Devon Energy from LaVaca and Dewitt Counties, TX, which were analyzed with a focus on diagenetic fabrics within the Lower Eagle Ford. A better understanding of paragenesis within the organic-rich Lower Eagle Ford was developed with the use of XRF and XRD measurements, thin section samples, stable isotope analysis, and CL analysis. The majority of diagenetic alteration occurred early at shallow depths within anoxic/suboxic environments and slightly sulfate-reducing conditions from diagenetic fluids with varying isotopic composition. Diagenetic expression variation is most influenced by the depositional facies in which alteration occurs. Within the study area, four identified depositional facies (A-D), and five diagenetic facies (1-5) were identified within the Lower Eagle Ford study area based
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Models and Evaluation of Undiscovered Conventional and Continuous Oil and Gas Resources— Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk, U.S
    Geologic Models and Evaluation of Undiscovered Conventional and Continuous Oil and Gas Resources— Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk, U.S. Gulf Coast Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front Cover. Photos taken by Krystal Pearson, U.S. Geological Survey, near the old Sprinkle Road bridge on Little Walnut Creek, Travis County, Texas. Geologic Models and Evaluation of Undiscovered Conventional and Continuous Oil and Gas Resources—Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk, U.S. Gulf Coast By Krystal Pearson Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Pearson, Krystal, 2012, Geologic models and evaluation of undiscovered conventional and continuous oil and gas resources—Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Organic Petrography in North American Shale Petroleum Systems: a Review
    International Journal of Coal Geology 163 (2016) 8–51 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Coal Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcoalgeo Application of organic petrography in North American shale petroleum systems: A review Paul C. Hackley a, Brian J. Cardott b a U.S. Geological Survey, MS 956 National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr, Reston, VA 20192, USA b Oklahoma Geological Survey, 100 E. Boyd St., Rm. N-131, Norman, OK 73019-0628, USA article info abstract Article history: Organic petrography via incident light microscopy has broad application to shale petroleum systems, including Received 13 April 2016 delineation of thermal maturity windows and determination of organo-facies. Incident light microscopy allows Received in revised form 10 June 2016 practitioners the ability to identify various types of organic components and demonstrates that solid bitumen Accepted 13 June 2016 is the dominant organic matter occurring in shale plays of peak oil and gas window thermal maturity, whereas Available online 16 June 2016 oil-prone Type I/II kerogens have converted to hydrocarbons and are not present. High magnification SEM obser- Keywords: vation of an interconnected organic porosity occurring in the solid bitumen of thermally mature shale reservoirs Organic petrology has enabled major advances in our understanding of hydrocarbon migration and storage in shale, but suffers Thermal maturity from inability to confirm the type of organic matter present. Herein we review organic petrography applications Shale petroleum systems in the North American shale plays through discussion of incident light photographic examples. In the first part of Unconventional resources the manuscript we provide basic practical information on the measurement of organic reflectance and outline Vitrinite reflectance fluorescence microscopy and other petrographic approaches to the determination of thermal maturity.
    [Show full text]