Public Appointments and Public Bodies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Appointments and Public Bodies DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 1 Public appointments and public bodies April 2007 DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 2 Our aim is to improve the quality of life for all through cultural and sporting activities, support the pursuit of excellence, and champion the tourism, creative and leisure industries. DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 3 Public appointments and public bodies 3 Contents Foreword by Jonathan Stephens, Permanent Secretary DCMS 4 PUBLIC BODIES 6 What is a public body? 6 Public service values 7 Roles and responsibilities 8 DCMS’s aim, objectives and targets 10 Conclusion 12 DCMS FAMILY 13 Sponsored bodies map 14 DCMS public bodies 16 PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS 27 How are appointments made? 27 How many appointments are made? 27 What is involved? 27 Are appointees paid? 27 Qualities required 28 Equal opportunities 28 Commissioner for Public Appointments 29 Further information 30 DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 4 4 Foreword Thank you for your interest in serving as a Board member on one of the public bodies sponsored by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. These are valuable, interesting and responsible roles – I am sure that if appointed you will find it a rewarding experience. This guide will help you navigate your way around the appointments system and understand how DCMS works with its public bodies. It summarises the respective roles of the Department and public bodies; the responsibilities of public bodies and their Boards; and the Department’s aim and objectives. The Secretary of State is committed to maximising the public value delivered by DCMS and the bodies it funds. One element of this is ensuring that our public bodies feel part of the communities they serve, are increasingly responsive to the citizen in general, and engage more proactively with a wider range of citizens, particularly those who are under-represented among participants in our sectors. Bodies will need to develop plans for engaging with citizens and ensuring that their views are fully reflected in decisions about programmes and services. The Secretary of State and I look forward to considering with our sponsored bodies what more we can do to tap into a rich spectrum of perspectives on the challenges and opportunities in each of our sectors. DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 5 Public appointments and public bodies 5 DCMS seeks to appoint Board members who combine with their focus on public value the ability to provide the strong governance that ensures strategic leadership, and supervise and challenge the executive. I also strongly encourage our Board members to contribute to the work the Department has launched on the back of our 2007 Capability Review to improve how we work with our public bodies, and to ensure that our approach is efficient, integrated and strategic. I hope you find this booklet useful and I look forward to welcoming you to the DCMS family. Jonathan Stephens Permanent Secretary Department for Culture, Media and Sport DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 6 6 Public bodies WHAT IS A PUBLIC BODY? A public body is an organisation which has a role in the processes of national government but is not a part of any government department. It is, however, largely funded by a sponsor department (or by a share of proceeds from the National Lottery) and its Board is normally appointed by the Secretary of State of the sponsor department. A public body operates at arm’s length from government and carries out work on its behalf, particularly in areas where the expertise and understanding of people outside government is needed or desirable. The main categories of body are as follows: • Executive non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) which carry out operational and regulatory functions, for example: Sport England, English Heritage and National Lottery Commission • Advisory NDPBs which advise the Government on specific issues, such as the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites and the Reviewing Committee on the Export of Works of Art. • Public Corporations, which are usually self-financing and are more autonomous than NDPBs, for example the BBC and S4C. The relationship between department and public body is a balance between independence and accountability. On the one hand, public bodies perform functions best carried out at a certain distance from the centre of government. For example, some are regulators, and must be seen to be independent of political interests. Others need specialised expertise not found in general public administration. On the other hand, public bodies spend public money, from the Exchequer or the National Lottery good causes, and are therefore accountable to citizens, Ministers and Parliament. That framework is encapsulated in the following key documents, which apply to most bodies: DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 7 Public appointments and public bodies 7 • Public Service Agreement (PSA): in a White Paper published every two years, the PSA sets out our aim and objectives, which should encompass the work of all our public bodies, and our key targets; • Funding agreement: supports the PSA by explaining what each body will deliver for the public funding allocated to it, and why; the agreement, signed every two years by the Chair of the body and the Secretary of State, summarises strategy, key activities, and outputs to be delivered; • Management statement and financial memorandum: sets out the rules and guidelines that a public body should observe in carrying out its functions; reviewed roughly every five years, but the content remains fairly constant; • for National Lottery distributing bodies, policy and financial directions, and a statement of financial requirements: setting out rules on the treatment of Lottery proceeds, particularly where this differs from the treatment of Exchequer funds. PUBLIC SERVICE VALUES As providers of public services, public bodies must • provide best value for money – ensuring services are delivered in the most effective, efficient and economical way; • maintain the highest standards in the stewardship of public funds – demonstrating impartiality, integrity and objectivity; • demonstrate openness and responsiveness in the way they operate and in their communications with the public; and • adhere to standards in public life set out in the seven Nolan principles. Of course the private sector has similar values, but in the public sector there is greater external scrutiny and greater expectation that at all times public bodies will observe, and be seen to be observing, these values. For example, even the perception of, or potential for, a conflict of interest can be almost as damaging as an actual conflict of interest. So it is important that Boards should be able to DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 8 8 demonstrate that they are using resources effectively and properly, and that public funds are not being used for private or partisan purposes. Roles and responsibilities Secretary of State/Sponsor Department • setting the policy framework within which the body operates, and the high- level objectives and targets it delivers • determining the amount of grant in aid to be allocated to the body and, where appropriate, its share of the money raised for good causes by the National Lottery • monitoring, and accounting to Parliament for, the body’s performance and stewardship of public money • (for officials) liaising with bodies on behalf of Ministers and advising Ministers on matters to do with sponsored bodies The Board of the Public Body • providing overall leadership and developing strategy, within the policy framework and expenditure limits set by the sponsor department • ensuring that high standards of corporate governance are maintained: that the organisation has effective control systems, decision-making processes and management, so that public resources are safeguarded, in particular from fraud and theft, and used to best effect. A crucial part of this is management and monitoring of risk • being responsible for carrying out the body’s statutory functions; for example, in the case of national museums and galleries, the long-term stewardship of collections and historic buildings • complementing the executive, not only by providing support and advice, but also by taking an independent view and challenging the status quo DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 9 Public appointments and public bodies 9 It is for each Board to decide exactly how it will operate. However observation of effective Boards suggests the following good practice: • the Board operates very much as a single corporate unit, but with all members making a full contribution; the Chair and DCMS seek to ensure the right skill mix to make this possible, and the body provides a structured training/development programme for members • Board meetings focus on important and strategic matters, with other matters for which the Board is responsible delegated to appropriate committees of officers (but the Boards of some DCMS bodies have to deal regularly with detailed case work) • the Board has special in-depth sessions on key issues, such as future strategy, which it is hard to get to grips with in regular meetings • individual members are given specific roles, eg chairing sub-committees, that make full use of their specific expertise The Chief Executive • working with the Chair to develop strategy proposals to present to the Board, and then advising the Board on implementation • acting as the body’s Accounting Officer: being personally responsible for the proper handling and use of the public funds at the body’s disposal; and contributing to the Department’s accounting to Parliament for these matters • overseeing and being responsible for day-to-day management and operations, including risk management and monitoring • advising the Board on the discharge of its responsibilities (as set out in founding legislation, management statement/financial memorandum, funding agreement, etc) DCMSSecondRevise 11/4/07 14:00 Page 10 10 DCMS’s aim, objectives and targets We engage with our public bodies mainly at the strategic level, in terms of what each body can contribute to delivery of the PSA and other strategic priorities.
Recommended publications
  • Horniman Museum to Reopen from Thursday 30 July
    For immediate release Issued Wednesday 8 July 2020 Horniman Museum to reopen from Thursday 30 July The Horniman will reopen its doors to the public from Thursday 30 July, for the first time since mid- March. Visitors (including Members) will need to pre-book for a free, timed entry slot, via the website horniman.ac.uk. As well as the popular galleries of natural history, world cultures and musical instruments, the Permian Monsters exhibition will also reopen on 30 July, with ticket prices from £5, and an extended run until 3 January 2021. However, some attractions will remain closed initially, including the Aquarium and Butterfly House, and some interactive exhibits have been removed or covered up. Social distancing and other safety measures will be in place throughout the Museum, including hand sanitisation stations, an enhanced cleaning regime, updated signage and a one-way visitor route. During the Museum’s 134-day closure, the Horniman’s Gardens have remained open, giving local residents much-needed green space for their daily exercise during the Coronavirus lockdown. The Horniman has gradually reopened additional facilities including toilets and Café Kiosks in the Gardens, and the Sunday Market. The main Café will reopen at the same time as the Museum with specific safety measures in place. Nick Merriman, Chief Executive of the Horniman Museum and Gardens, says: ‘We’ve heard from many of our visitors how much they’ve missed the Museum. We are immensely grateful for their support during closure and look forward to welcoming them back. Our priority as we return is to increase the diversity of our visitors, address our colonial history and accelerate work on the climate and ecological emergency.’ Pre-booked tickets will be available on the website from Monday 20 July.
    [Show full text]
  • Gambling Commission Submission to the Australian Online Gambling Review
    Gambling Commission submission to the Australian online gambling review Inquiry by Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform into Interactive Gambling – Further Review of Internet Gaming and Wagering June 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 The Gambling Commission 3 3 The Gambling Act 2005 4 4 Remote gambling 5 5 The Gambling Act 2005: Definition of gambling 5 6 The Gambling Act 2005: Definition of remote gambling 5 7 Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice 5 8 Remote technical standards 6 9 Betting exchanges 7 10 Developments in remote gambling 7 11 Betting Integrity 10 12 Conclusion 14 2 1 Introduction 1.1 This document provides information in response to questions outlined in the 17 May 2011 annoucement by the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform on the further review of internet gaming and wagering. 1.2 The responses to the questions in the paper are covered throughout this document and the following highlights the sections in which the answers can be found: (a) the recent growth in interactive sports betting and the changes in online wagering due to new technologies – covered in section 10 (b) the development of new technologies, including mobile phone and interactive television, that increase the risk and incidence of problem gambling – covered in section 10 (c) the relative regulatory frameworks of online and non-online gambling – covered in sections 2 – 8 (d) inducements to bet on sporting events online – covered in section 7.3 (e) The risk of match-fixing in sports as a result of the types of bets available online, and whether
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees of the Royal Armouries Annual Report And
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ROYAL ARMOURIES ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 HC 807 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ROYAL ARMOURIES ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraphs 29 (7) and 30 (4) of Schedule 1 to the National Heritage Act 1983. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 24 March 2021 HC 807 © Royal Armouries copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286--2144-1 CCS0420500350 03/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. CONTENTS Page Trustees’ and Accounting Officer’s Annual Report 2 Remuneration Report 32 Statement of the Trustees’ and Accounting Officer’s Responsibilities 37 Governance Statement 39 Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General 49 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 54 Consolidated Balance Sheet 56 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 57 Notes to the Financial Statements 58 TRUSTEES’ AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Royal Armouries is Britain’s national museum of arms and armour, and one of the most important museums of its type in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Social Impacts of Culture and Sport
    A review of the Social Impacts of Culture and Sport Peter Taylor, Larissa Davies, Peter Wells, Jan Gilbertson and William Tayleur March 2015 The Social Impacts of Engagement with Culture and Sport The Culture and Sport Evidence (CASE) programme is a joint programme of strategic research led by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) in collaboration with the Arts Council England (ACE), English Heritage (EH) and Sport England (SE). The Sport Industry Research Centre and Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research (Sheffield Hallam University) and Business of Culture (BOC) were commissioned to produce this report. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of CASE. SIRC Research team: Peter Taylor Larissa Davies Elizabeth Christy Eleanor Cooley Anderson Taylor Rebecca Jones CRESR Research team: Peter Wells Jan Gilbertson BOC Research team: William Tayleur Virginie Dumas 3 The Social Impacts of Engagement with Culture and Sport Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Scope and Definitions .................................................................................................. 11 1.1.1 Social impacts and costs ............................................................................... 11 1.1.2 Sport and culture ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Artist Katie Schwab Joins New Collective to Co-Produce Horniman’S 2019 Studio Exhibition
    For immediate release Issued 28 February 2019 Artist Katie Schwab joins new Collective to co-produce Horniman’s 2019 Studio exhibition London-based visual artist Katie Schwab has joined a new Collective of 10 local community members to co-produce the 2019 exhibition in the Horniman Museum and Garden’s new arts space, The Studio. The Collective will explore ideas around ‘memory’ and draw inspiration from the Horniman’s anthropology collections for the next Studio exhibition which will open in October 2019. The exhibition, bringing together new artwork and collections, will be accompanied by a programme of events and activities also co-produced by the Collective. The Collective members collaborating on the exhibition are: Ahmadzia, a volunteer at Southwark Day Centre for Asylum Seekers (SDCAS) and a kite maker, who came to the UK in 2006 from Kunduz, Afghanistan, and is a refugee Carola Cappellari, a photojournalism and documentary photography student who volunteered her skills to produce promotional material for the Indoamerican Refugee and Migrant Organisation, a community-led organisation supporting Latin Americans to build secure and integrated lives in the UK Francis Stanfield, a multi-tasker when it comes to music who describes himself as ‘the original stuporman’. He is influenced by surrealism, films and art, likes ‘anything out of the weird’ and joined the Collective through his involvement with St. Christopher’s Hospice Godfrey Gardin, from Kenya but living in London, who volunteers with SDCAS ‘because it enriches the community where I live’ and who also has an interest in gardening Jacqueline Benn, who has a career background in TV programming planning and immersive theatre, and whose interests lie also in the arts, and producing short films.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to the Gambling Commission
    Sarah Gardener Committee of Advertising Practice Executive Director Castle House, 37-45 Paul Street Gambling Commission London EC2A 4LS Telephone 020 7492 2200 Email [email protected] [email protected] www.cap.org.uk 22 October 2020 Dear Sarah Update on CAP and BCAP’s response to the GambleAware research I’m pleased to inform you that CAP and BCAP have today published a consultation proposing significant new restrictions on the creative content of gambling and lotteries advertising. This is an important step in meeting our commitment to respond in full to the emerging findings of the GambleAware research and ensuring that the UK Advertising Codes remain up to date with the evidence base in protecting under-18s and other vulnerable groups. The consultation will run until 22 January and we hope to announce the outcome in the first half of 2021, introducing any changes to the Codes by the end of the year. As well as introducing the consultation, this letter comments on several of the GambleAware recommendations directed at industry or where we have been carrying out policy and enforcement activity separate to the consultation. You’ll be aware that several of the recommendations have been carried over from GambleAware’s Interim Synthesis Report, published in July 2019 Restrictions on adverting volumes We address in the consultation the GambleAware question of whether to strengthen the existing policy (CAP’s ‘25% test’) on where, in non-broadcast media, it is acceptable to place a gambling ad. But, we also note the separate recommendation, directed at industry, to reduce the overall volume of gambling advertising and marketing messages reaching children, young people and vulnerable adults.
    [Show full text]
  • A Filmmakers' Guide to Distribution and Exhibition
    A Filmmakers’ Guide to Distribution and Exhibition A Filmmakers’ Guide to Distribution and Exhibition Written by Jane Giles ABOUT THIS GUIDE 2 Jane Giles is a film programmer and writer INTRODUCTION 3 Edited by Pippa Eldridge and Julia Voss SALES AGENTS 10 Exhibition Development Unit, bfi FESTIVALS 13 THEATRIC RELEASING: SHORTS 18 We would like to thank the following people for their THEATRIC RELEASING: FEATURES 27 contribution to this guide: PLANNING A CINEMA RELEASE 32 NON-THEATRIC RELEASING 40 Newton Aduaka, Karen Alexander/bfi, Clare Binns/Zoo VIDEO Cinemas, Marc Boothe/Nubian Tales, Paul Brett/bfi, 42 Stephen Brown/Steam, Pamela Casey/Atom Films, Chris TELEVISION 44 Chandler/Film Council, Ben Cook/Lux Distribution, INTERNET 47 Emma Davie, Douglas Davis/Atom Films, CASE STUDIES 52 Jim Dempster/bfi, Catharine Des Forges/bfi, Alnoor GLOSSARY 60 Dewshi, Simon Duffy/bfi, Gavin Emerson, Alexandra FESTIVAL & EVENTS CALENDAR 62 Finlay/Channel 4, John Flahive/bfi, Nicki Foster/ CONTACTS 64 McDonald & Rutter, Satwant Gill/British Council, INDEX 76 Gwydion Griffiths/S4C, Liz Harkman/Film Council, Tony Jones/City Screen, Tinge Krishnan/Disruptive Element Films, Luned Moredis/Sgrîn, Méabh O’Donovan/Short CONTENTS Circuit, Kate Ogborn, Nicola Pierson/Edinburgh BOXED INFORMATION: HOW TO APPROACH THE INDUSTRY 4 International Film Festival, Lisa Marie Russo, Erich BEST ADVICE FROM INDUSTRY PROFESSIONALS 5 Sargeant/bfi, Cary Sawney/bfi, Rita Smith, Heather MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS 5 Stewart/bfi, John Stewart/Oil Factory, Gary DEALS & CONTRACTS 8 Thomas/Arts Council of England, Peter Todd/bfi, Zoë SHORT FILM BUREAU 11 Walton, Laurel Warbrick-Keay/bfi, Sheila Whitaker/ LONDON & EDINBURGH 16 article27, Christine Whitehouse/bfi BLACK & ASIAN FILMS 17 SHORT CIRCUIT 19 Z00 CINEMAS 20 The editors have made every endeavour to ensure the BRITISH BOARD OF FILM CLASSIFICATION 21 information in this guide is correct at the time of GOOD FILMS GOOD PROGRAMMING 22 going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2016/17
    Historic Royal Places – Spines Format A4 Portrait Spine Width 35mm Spine Height 297mm HRP Text 20pt (Tracked at +40) Palace Text 30pt (Tracked at -10) Icon 20mm Wide (0.5pt/0.25pt) Annual Review 2016/17 1 2 06 Welcome to another chapter in our story Contents 07 Our work is guided by four principles 08 Chairman’s Introduction 09 Chief Executive – a reflection 10 The Year of the Gardens 14 Guardianship 20 Showmanship 26 Discovery 32 Independence 38 Money matters 39 Visitor trends 40 Summarised financial statements 42 Trustees and Directors 44 Supporters 46 Acknowledgments Clockwise from top left: The White Tower, Tower of London; the West Front, Hampton Court Palace; the East Front, Kensington Palace; the South Front, Hillsborough Castle; Kew Palace; Banqueting House. 4 This year, the famous gardens of Hampton Court Palace took Guardianship: Welcome to centre stage. Already a huge attraction in their own right, this Our work is We exist for tomorrow, not just for yesterday. Our job is to give year the historic gardens burst into even more vibrant life. these palaces a future as valuable as their past. We know how another Prompted by the 300th anniversary of the birth of Lancelot guided by four precious they and their contents are, and we aim to conserve ‘Capability’ Brown, we created a spectacular programme of them to the standard they deserve: the best. chapter in exhibitions, events and activities. A highlight was the royal principles Discovery: opening of the Magic Garden; our playful and spectacular We explain the bigger picture, and then encourage people to our story 21st century contribution to 500 years of garden history.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge OCR Spec B: History Around Us
    OCR HISTORY AROUND US Site Proposal Form Example from English Heritage The Criteria The study of the selected site must focus on the relationship between the site, other historical sources and the aspects listed in a) to n) below. It is therefore essential that centres choose a site that allows learners to use its physical features, together with other historical sources as appropriate, to understand all of the following: a) The reasons for the location of the site within its surroundings b) When and why people first created the site c) The ways in which the site has changed over time d) How the site has been used throughout its history e) The diversity of activities and people associated with the site f) The reasons for changes to the site and to the way it was used g) Significant times in the site’s past: peak activity, major developments, turning points h) The significance of specific features in the physical remains at the site i) The importance of the whole site either locally or nationally, as appropriate j) The typicality of the site based on a comparison with other similar sites k) What the site reveals about everyday life, attitudes and values in particular periods of history l) How the physical remains may prompt questions about the past and how historians frame these as valid historical enquiries m) How the physical remains can inform artistic reconstructions and other interpretations of the site n) The challenges and benefits of studying the historic environment 1 Copyright © OCR 2018 Site name: STONEHENGE Created by: ENGLISH HERITAGE LEARNING TEAM Please provide an explanation of how your site meets each of the following points and include the most appropriate visual images of your site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Parks Sustainability Policy
    The Royal Parks Sustainability Policy The Royal Parks charity manages over 5,000 acres of historic parkland and open spaces across London. This includes eight Royal parks: Hyde Park, Kensington Gardens, St James’s Park, The Green Park, Regent’s Park & Primrose Hill, Richmond Park, Greenwich Park and Bushy Park. The charity also manages other important green spaces in London, including Victoria Tower Gardens and Brompton Cemetery. The eight Royal Parks have been awarded Green Flag status, which recognises them as some of the UK’s best-kept green spaces and heritage landscapes. The nature quality of the Royal Parks is recognised through a number of international, national and local nature conservation designations. We believe that all aspects of our operation should be carried out in a way that takes advantage of enhancement opportunities, minimises our adverse impacts on the environment, while maintaining the economic viability of the parks. Therefore, we have developed a Sustainability Strategy that focuses on four key pillars: • Conserve and enhance the unique landscapes, built heritage & biodiversity • People, education, fairness and improving wellbeing • Mitigation and adapting to climate change • Sustainable growth - providing environmentally excellent and financially viable green open spaces to the public Within these sustainability pillars, our key commitments include: • Effective conservation and enhancement of landscape, wildlife and buildings. • Promoting sustainability messages through learning and engagement programmes for audiences of all ages and backgrounds. • Enhancing biodiversity through appropriate management of The Royal Parks and participation in Partnerships. • Working with Event partners to deliver sustainable events, ensuring everything practicable is done to not negatively impact on biodiversity, maximise waste recycling, minimise greenhouse gas emissions from temporary power and mains water use (except where the mains water replaces bottled water).
    [Show full text]
  • Attractions Management News 7Th August 2019 Issue
    Find great staff™ Jobs start on page 27 MANAGEMENT NEWS 7 AUGUST 2019 ISSUE 136 www.attractionsmanagement.com Universal unveils Epic Universe plans Universal has finally confirmed plans for its fourth gate in Orlando, officially announcing its Epic Universe theme park. Announced at an event held at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, Epic Universe will be the latest addition to Florida's lucrative theme park sector and has been touted as "an entirely new level of experience that forever changes theme park entertainment". "Our new park represents the single- largest investment Comcast has made ■■The development almost doubles in its theme park business and in Florida Universal's theme park presence in Orlando overall,” said Brian Roberts, Comcast chair and CEO. "It reflects the tremendous restaurants and more. The development excitement we have for the future of will nearly double Universal’s total our theme park business and for our available space in central Florida. entire company’s future in Florida." "Our vision for Epic Universe is While no specific details have been historic," said Tom Williams, chair and revealed about what IPs will feature in CEO for Universal Parks and Resorts. This is the single largest the park, Universal did confirm that the "It will become the most immersive and investment Comcast has made 3sq km (1.2sq m) site would feature innovative theme park we've ever created." in its theme park business an entertainment centre, hotels, shops, MORE: http://lei.sr/J5J7j_T Brian Roberts FINANCIALS NEW AUDIENCES
    [Show full text]
  • Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan
    Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan Published by Historic Royal Palaces © Historic Royal Palaces 2007 Historic Royal Palaces Hampton Court Palace Surrey KT8 9AU June 2007 Foreword By David Lammy MP Minister for Culture I am delighted to support this Management Plan for the Tower of London World Heritage Site. The Tower of London, founded by William the Conqueror in 1066-7, is one of the world’s most famous fortresses, and Britain’s most visited heritage site. It was built to protect and control the city and the White Tower survives largely intact from the Norman period. Architecture of almost all styles that have since flourished in England may be found within the walls. The Tower has been a fortress, a palace and a prison, and has housed the Royal Mint, the Public Records and the Royal Observatory. It was for centuries the arsenal for small arms, the predecessor of the present Royal Armouries, and has from early times guarded the Crown Jewels. Today the Tower is the key to British history for visitors who come every year from all over the world to relive the past and to enjoy the pageantry of the present. It is deservedly a World Heritage Site. The Government is accountable to UNESCO and the wider international community for the future conservation and presentation of the Tower. It is a responsibility we take seriously. The purpose of the Plan is to provide an agreed framework for long-term decision-making on the conservation and improvement of the Tower and sustaining its outstanding universal value.
    [Show full text]