DOCSLIB.ORG

January 30, 2015 CEDAW Secretariat OHCHR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 30, 2015 CEDAW Secretariat OHCHR January 30, 2015 CEDAW Secretariat OHCHR - Palais Wilson 52, rue des Pâquis CH-1201 Geneva 10 Switzerland Re: Supplemental Information on the Russian Federation, Adoption of List of Issues by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women During its Pre-Sessional Working Group Meeting, March 9-13, 2015 Distinguished Committee Members: The Center for Reproductive Rights (New York/Geneva) and Russian Association for Population and Development (Moscow), both independent non-governmental organizations, respectfully present this submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW Committee) with regard to the adoption of the list of issues on the Russian Federation. We hope that the CEDAW Committee will consider the human rights concerns addressed in this submission as it formulates the list of issues on Russia. The practices and policies outlined in this submission violate Russia’s obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (the Convention)1 to ensure that women can enjoy their human rights free from discrimination and on a basis of substantive equality. The submission focuses in particular on specific violations of Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12 and 16 of the Convention that occur in Russia in the field of reproductive health care and as a result of restrictions on civil participation and freedom of expression. In Section 1 it provides a contextual analysis of the troubling impact of Russian laws and policies on civil society, gender equality and sexual minorities. In Section 2 it outlines specific ways in which the state is failing to respect, protect and fulfil women’s reproductive rights. At the end of each section a number of recommendations are outlined. 1. Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 16 of the Convention: State laws and policies attacking civil society, gender equality and sexual minorities In recent years, Russia has introduced a series of laws and policies that severely undermine the role of civil society, the principle of gender equality, and the rights of sexual minorities. These measures include (a) the ‘foreign agents’ law, (b) the active promotion of “traditional family” values and endorsement of wrongful gender stereotypes, and (3) the anti-LGBT ‘propaganda’ laws. These measures undermine Russia’s compliance with its obligations under the Convention. By systematically eroding the position of civil society, including women’s rights organizations, promoting wrongful gender stereotypes in the name of protecting “traditional family” values, and attacking LGBT communities, Russia is fostering an environment supportive of discriminatory practices and hostile to diverse civil society participation in public life. As the Committee has outlined on many occasions, compliance with the Convention requires state parties to refrain from engaging in discrimination against women, to abolish discriminatory laws, to ensure laws and policies are in place that guarantee the principle of gender equality in practice and to address wrongful gender stereotypes. The Committee has also called on states to actively enable the participation of women’s rights organizations in public life and to ensure women human rights defenders can operate freely. In addition, the Committee has held that the Convention requires states to prevent and address multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination faced by women.2 a. ‘Foreign agents’ law: undermining the position of civil society organizations In 2012, the Russian Duma introduced the ‘foreign agents’ law, according to which, non- governmental organizations registered in Russia must register with the Ministry of Justice as “foreign agents” if the organization is involved in “political activity” exercised in Russia and obtains foreign funding.3 The definition of “political activity” is extremely vague and therefore can encompass all aspects of human rights advocacy. In March 2013, the Russian authorities forced several NGOs to register as so called foreign agents as a result of an intrusive campaign to identify “foreign agents” during which hundreds of organizations were inspected.4 Although many of the groups challenged their registration in court, most lost their cases and decided to shut down their organization rather than be labeled foreign agents.5 Others were forced to shut down due to exorbitant fines imposed under the legislation.6 In May 2014, the law was amended to allow the Ministry of Justice to register organizations as “foreign agents” without their consent.7 As of January 18, 2015, the list of NGOs registered as “foreign agents” includes thirty NGOs identified by the government as well as two NGOs that registered voluntarily.8 Organizations registered as foreign agents “immediately encounter[] serious problems,” such as complex reporting requirements, inspections and controls.9 They also often lose the cooperation of partnering organizations in Russia, who are afraid of being associated with them.10 Women’s rights organizations and service providers are among those severely affected by the law.11 b. The state’s promotion of “traditional family” values and wrongful gender stereotypes For a number of years activities and rhetoric on the part of high level state officials in Russia have promoted “traditional family” values and undermined gender equality. 2 Senior state representatives in Russia have publicly endorsed wrongful gender stereotypes and spoken out against alternative family models. For example, President Putin, has emphasized on several occasions that the support for the “traditional family” is the state’s goal.12 Meanwhile the head of the Duma’s Committee on Family, Women and Children, Ms. Yelena Mizulina, regularly and actively promotes “traditional family” values.13 Among other things, she has criticized the Russian Family Code for not including a definition of the “traditional family”,14 and has said that laws and policies supporting couples who cohabit without being married are “a sort of a crime against the family institution […] in the historical sense.”15 She has said that amendments to Russian laws which would support the traditional family should be adopted.16 In addition, in 2011 she introduced legislative proposals that purported to severely restrict women’s access to abortion services. Only two of those restrictions were ultimately adopted by the Parliament (see section 2.a. below).17 In this context it is notable that reports indicate that a significant amount of available state funding for civil society organizations appears to have been directed to religious or public organizations promoting “traditional values”.18 c. The anti-LGBT ‘propaganda’ laws: discrimination against LGBT The Russian government’s moves to promote the “traditional family” and endorse conservative moral and religious values also encompasses the anti-LGBT ‘propaganda’ laws. Beginning in 2006, eleven regions of the Russian Federation passed laws that prohibited the “promotion of homosexuality” among minors.19 In June 2013, the Duma unanimously passed a federal version of these laws banning the spread of “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations” to minors.20 These laws are now being enforced across Russia. Not only do the laws prohibit the provision of information on gay rights or homosexuality but they also prohibit the equation of “traditional” with “nontraditional” relationships.21 Since the adoption of the laws violence and harassment faced by lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, as well as by gay men, has increased in Russia.22 As Human Rights Watch reported, “[g]overnment officials, journalists, and celebrities have publicly called LGBT people “perverts,” “sodomites,” and “abnormal,” and have conflated homosexuality with pedophilia.”23 Recommended questions to be addressed by the Russian government: 1. In light of concerns that the ‘foreign agents’ law contravenes Russia’s obligations under CEDAW, please provide information on what measures the state is taking to address the law and in what timeframe. 2. In light of concerns that the state’s promotion of “traditional family” values contravenes the state’s obligations under CEDAW to eliminate negative gender stereotypes and promote gender equality, please provide information on what measures the state is taking to address the law and in what timeframe. 3. In light of concerns that the anti-LGBT ‘propaganda’ laws and regulations contravene the state’s obligations under CEDAW, please provide information on what measures the state is taking to address the laws and in what timeframe. 3 2. Articles 1, 2, 5, 10, 12 and 16 of the Convention: The state’s failure to respect, protect and fulfil women’s reproductive rights In this section we outline the ways in which Russia’s laws and practices continue to undermine women’s enjoyment of their reproductive rights. In particular, we address: (a) barriers in access to safe abortion services and the current attempt to introduce legislation which would criminalize and prohibit abortion; (b) barriers in access to contraceptive services and information; and (c) the absence of mandatory, evidence- and rights-based sexuality education in schools. a. Barriers in access to safe abortion services and the current attempt to criminally prohibit abortion Current legislation allows abortion in Russia without restriction as to reason until the 12th week of pregnancy. Thereafter, abortion is permitted only when the pregnancy is the result of rape (until the 22nd week of pregnancy) or for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abortion As a Means of Family Planning in Russia in the First Quarter of the Twentieth Century
    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 7 (2013 6) 1066-1074 ~ ~ ~ УДК 343.621 Abortion as a Means of Family Planning in Russia in the First Quarter of the Twentieth Century Mikhail D. Severyanova* and Larisa U. Anisimovab aSiberian Federal University 79 Svobodny pr., Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia bRussian State Social University (branch in Krasnoyarsk) 11, Mozhaiskogo st., Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia Received 30.07.2012, received in revised form 10.02.2013, accepted 31.05.2013 In November 18, 1920 Soviet Russia became the first state in the world ever to legalize abortion. The authors of this article summarize the experience of its legalization in the 1920–1936 years. Reveal the socio-economic, health and other reasons that motivate women to abortion, moreover, authors show the interrelation the number of children in the family and mortality, as a result uncovered concrete historical causality adopted in the USSR in 1936 a law banning abortion. Keywords: law, legal and clandestine abortion, family planning, fertility, mortality. Abortion – is a form of modern family world where abortion was legalized for medical planning in many countries of the world. For and social reasons. The purpose of the act was to example, in France, abortion was legalized in bring abortion out of the underground state. 1975, in Belgium – 1980, in Poland – 1956, in This article reviews the history of abortion in the UK – in 1967, West Germany – in 1976, in Tsarist and Soviet Russia. The complexity of this Turkey – 1983, in the U.S. – in 1973. July, 3, 2002 study is that there are no adequate and reliable the European Parliament adopted a decision to statistics on abortion and death in this period, legalize abortion in the European Community.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: in Search of Decriminalization Marge Berer
    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal HHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: In Search of Decriminalization marge berer Abstract The aim of this paper is to provide a panoramic view of laws and policies on abortion around the world, giving a range of country-based examples. It shows that the plethora of convoluted laws and restrictions surrounding abortion do not make any legal or public health sense. What makes abortion safe is simple and irrefutable—when it is available on the woman’s request and is universally affordable and accessible. From this perspective, few existing laws are fit for purpose. However, the road to law reform is long and difficult. In order to achieve the right to safe abortion, advocates will need to study the political, health system, legal, juridical, and socio-cultural realities surrounding existing law and policy in their countries, and decide what kind of law they want (if any). The biggest challenge is to determine what is possible to achieve, build a critical mass of support, and work together with legal experts, parliamentarians, health professionals, and women themselves to change the law—so that everyone with an unwanted pregnancy who seeks an abortion can have it, as early as possible and as late as necessary. Marge Berer is international coordinator of the International Campaign for Women’s Right to Safe Abortion, London, UK, and was the editor of Reproductive Health Matters, which she founded, from 1993 to 2015. Please address correspondence to Marge Berer. Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • WOMEN's RIGHT and ABORTION: a JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS Dr
    International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences (IJRESS) Available online at: http://euroasiapub.org Vol. 7 Issue 8, August- 2017, pp. 419~430 ISSN(o): 2249-7382 | Impact Factor: 6.939 WOMEN’S RIGHT AND ABORTION: A JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS Dr. Amit Kashyap* Assistant Professor, Centre For Law, CUPB-151001 Satish Singh** Student of 1st Year, LL.M., Centre For Law, CUPB-151001 Abstract: This paper deals with the issue of abortion and a women's right. Although, abortion has been the very controversial issue which is still subsisting in the nation in a questionable form. Moreover, now there are two groups of different opinion related to abortion. One is a conservative group or so- called pro-life group which opposes abortion and consider it as sin. That group mostly formed of theologists, priest, maulvis, etc. Although on another side we have a liberal group or so-called pro- choice group. They consider that the women shall have the Right to have the full control over her body and to decide what to happen or not happen with them and as such it shall be at the discretion of a woman that she is willing to abort or not. Sincerely, dealing with such type of issues this paper has remained divided into seven parts and which consist of Introduction, meaning, and history of abortion & its laws about the study of various countries including India. The legal position of the unborn child in the womb and battle between the right of a mother and right of an unborn. The present laws of abortion concerning various countries and how they have been liberalized or have been made strict, jurisprudential analysis of the right of unborn and of a woman in the context of social engineering and utility principle, Roe v.
    [Show full text]
  • "Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!"Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era Amy E
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons History College of Arts & Sciences Fall 2011 "Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!"Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era Amy E. Randall Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/history Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Randall, A. E. (2011). “Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!”: Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era. Journal of Women’s History, 23(3), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2011.0027 Copyright © 2011 Journal of Women's History. This article was first published in Journal of Women’s History 23:3 (2011), 13-38. Reprinted with permission by Johns Hopkins University Press. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2011 “Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!” Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era Amy E. Randall This article examines Soviet reproductive politics after the Communist regime legalized abortion in 1955. The regime’s new abortion policy did not result in an end to the condemnation of abortion in official discourse. The government instead launched an extensive campaign against abor- tion. Why did authorities bother legalizing the procedure if they still disapproved of it so strongly? Using archival sources, public health materials, and medical as well as popular journals to investigate the antiabortion campaign, this article argues that the Soviet government sought to regulate gender and sexuality through medical intervention and health “education” rather than prohibition and force in the post- Stalin era.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN POLICY on ABORTION by Stanislav Kulov, Moses Kondrashin
    RUSSIAN POLICY ON ABORTION by Stanislav Kulov, Moses Kondrashin The present memorandum aims at providing a concise and documented analysis on the Russian policy on abortion through the understanding of the legal landscape’s evolution and the causes of such an evolution. SOCIAL CONTEXT 1 POSITION OF RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS 6 PRO-LIFE CIVIL MOVEMENTS 9 LEGAL LANDSCAPE 10 WHAT SHOULD WE DO? 13 SOCIAL CONTEXT An increasing support for a better protection of prenatal life. In 2003, the vice-speaker of the State Duma, Arthur Chilingarov, said that in terms of numbers of abortions, Russia came out top in the world. The MPs talked about the possibility of banning abortion or reducing the recourse to it, but Victor Medkov, associate professor at the Department of Family Sociology and Demography at the Faculty of Sociology at the Moscow State University, explained that the population would not increase as a consequence of a partial or total ban on abortion. According to him, if “a woman decides to have an abortion, she will do it anyway, and that is her right.”1 In 2004, participants in the church-public forum “The Spiritual and Moral Basis of 1 ЕЛЕНА Ъ-ВАНСОВИЧ, “Nothing will save Russia from mortality, Kommersant Newspaper No.57 from 03.04.2003, p. 8, Kommersant URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/374715 (last checked: 04.02.2020). 1 RUSSIAN POLICY ON ABORTION by Stanislav Kulov, Moses Kondrashin Russia’s Demographic Development” called on the Russian President to ban abortion by law and appealed to the Ministry of Health demanding “to introduce a reduction in their number as a criterion for women’s counseling activities” and “to qualify an artificial interruption in the criteria of medical ethics pregnancy without medical evidence as premeditated murder.”2 Mikhail Rokitsky, a member of the State Duma Committee on Health Protection, said in response that “we are often thrown in with requests to draft a law banning abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Reporting in the United States: an Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys
    Demography (2020) 57:899–925 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4 Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys Laura Lindberg1 & Kathryn Kost1 & Isaac Maddow-Zimet1 & Sheila Desai1 & Mia Zolna1 Published online: 26 May 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Despite its frequency, abortion remains a highly sensitive, stigmatized, and difficult-to- measure behavior. We present estimates of abortion underreporting for three of the most commonly used national fertility surveys in the United States: the National Survey of Family Growth, the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Numbers of abortions reported in each survey were compared with external abortion counts obtained from a census of all U.S. abortion providers, with adjustments for comparable respondent ages and periods of each data source. We examined the influence of survey design factors, including survey mode, sampling frame, and length of recall, on abortion underreporting. We used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate potential measurement biases in relationships between abortion and other variables. Underreporting of abortion in the United States compromises the ability to study abortion— and, consequently, almost any pregnancy-related experience—using national fertility surveys. Keywords Abortion . Survey measurement . Fertility . Data quality Introduction Demographic research on fertility experiences relies on high-quality data from population surveys, particularly from respondents’ self-reports of births, miscarriages, and abortions.1 1Many transgender men, gender-nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people also need and have abortions. Unfortunately, we are unable to identify these populations in this study because the NSFG, NLSY, and Add Health are designed to measure self-reported sex as male or female.
    [Show full text]
  • Induced Abortion, Infant and Maternal Mortality
    RUSSIA Fertility, Contraception, Induced Abortion, Infant and Maternal Mortality N. B. Barkalov and Leonid E. Darsky The paper is written with the collaboration of: Boris P. Denisov, Ph.D., Population Studies Center of Moscow University V. Josi Echinique, Ph.D., Population Studies Center of Moscow University L. Vv Gavrilova, Ph.D., M.D. the Deputy Director of the Department of Maternal and Child Care of the Ministry of Health Care of Russia Tatiana L. Khar’kova, Ph.D., Research Institute of the Goscomstat of Russia. OPTIONS II Project The Futures Group International 1050 17th Street NW Washington DC 20036 202-775-9680 March 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTSУ ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................................... i POPULATION...................................................................................................................................... 3 FERTILITY....................................................................................................................................... 13 INFANT AND MATERNAL MORTALITY.................... ................................................................ 21 CONTRACEPTION........................................................................................................................... 29 INDUCED ABORTION.................................................................................................................... 39 NOTES..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Abortion Culture
    TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ABORTION CULTURE GAIL GRANT ABSTRACT What is ‘abortion culture’? Whenever family planning in former Soviet states is discussed it is almost inevitable that the phrase ‘abortion culture’ will be used to describe the context within which fertility was, and to an extent still is, controlled in this region. The aim of this paper is to look at the history of abortion in the region, to see how an abortion culture might have been created and maintained, and to suggest a framework for the analysis of abortion culture. The case of Estonia is used as an example and evidence from other former Soviet states and from Eastern and Central European countries is used for illustration of the issues discussed. Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute Applications & Policy Working Paper A04/23 Towards a Framework for the Analysis of Abortion Culture Gail Grant Division of Social Statistics School of Social Sciences University of Southampton What is ‘abortion culture’? Whenever family planning in former Soviet states is discussed it is almost inevitable that the phrase ‘abortion culture’ will be used to describe the context within which fertility was, and to an extent still is, controlled in this region. Abortion rates in the former Soviet states remain the highest in the developed world (Henshaw, Singh and Haas 1999). High abortion rates are said to be a result of abortion culture and, in a kind of circular argument, abortion culture the result of high abortion rates. Mention is often made of limited access to modern and effective contraception, but otherwise little attempt is made to unpick the elements that might together constitute abortion culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incidence of Abortion Worldwide by Stanley K
    The Incidence of Abortion Worldwide By Stanley K. Henshaw, Susheela Singh and Taylor Haas lection approaches and methods of esti- Context: Accurate measurement of induced abortion levels has proven difficult in many parts mation to obtain the best possible esti- of the world. Health care workers and policymakers need information on the incidence of both mates of the number of induced abortions legal and illegal induced abortion to provide the needed services and to reduce the negative im- occurring worldwide and in specific re- pact of unsafe abortion on women’s health. gions and countries. The research report- Methods: Numbers and rates of induced abortions were estimated from four sources: official ed on in this article continues a series of statistics or other national data on legal abortions in 57 countries; estimates based on popula- worldwide overviews of the level of abor- tion surveys for two countries without official statistics; special studies for 10 countries where tion and takes a similar approach to data 3 abortion is highly restricted; and worldwide and regional estimates of unsafe abortion from the compilation and estimation. It also draws World Health Organization. on compilations of the level of abortion from organizations and researchers for Results: Approximately 26 million legal and 20 million illegal abortions were performed world- various regions or countries.4 wide in 1995, resulting in a worldwide abortion rate of 35 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. Among This article presents current estimates the subregions of the world, Eastern Europe had the highest abortion rate (90 per 1,000) and of the level of induced abortion, based on Western Europe the lowest rate (11 per 1,000).
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Is Communism: a Genealogy of "Abortion Culture" Heather Nicole Bradford Minnesota State University - Mankato
    Minnesota State University, Mankato Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato All Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects Projects 2015 Abortion is Communism: A Genealogy of "Abortion Culture" Heather Nicole Bradford Minnesota State University - Mankato Follow this and additional works at: http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds Part of the Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Regional Sociology Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Bradford, Heather Nicole, "Abortion is Communism: A Genealogy of "Abortion Culture"" (2015). All Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects. Paper 412. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects at Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. 1 Abortion is Communism: A Genealogy of “Abortion Culture” Heather Bradford 04/07/2015 2 Abortion is Communism: A Genealogy of “Abortion Culture” An Thesis Submitted to the Department of Sociology and Corrections in partial fulfillment of the Master’s Degree Minnesota State University-Mankato by Heather Bradford April 7 th 2015 3 Abortion is Communism: A Genealogy of “Abortion Culture” by Heather Bradford Approved for submittal to the Department of Sociology and Corrections for consideration of granting graduation: Research Sponsor ______________________ Date ________________________ William Wagner Second Reader ______________________ Date ________________________ Paul Prew Third Reader ______________________ Date ________________________ James Dimock 4 Table of contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion in Post-Soviet Russia: Is There Any Reason for Optimism? *
    ABORTION IN POST-SOVIET RUSSIA: IS THERE ANY REASON FOR OPTIMISM? * BORIS DENISOV, VICTORIA SAKEVICH This paper considers the problem of abortion in modern Russia. Using official statistics, we analyze the dynamics of abortion indicators since the early 1990s. On the basis of representative national sample surveys, we conclude that official statistics are complete and reliable. This in turn confirms the steady decline of abortions during the post-Soviet years. A particularly rapid decline in abortions is seen among the youngest women. Modern teenagers have fewer abortions than their predecessors at this age. The current level of induced abortions in women under age 20 in Russia today is less than in France, Great Britain, Sweden, and a number of other developed countries of European culture. The major differentiating factor for frequency of abortion is age. There are no clear correlations between the risks of abortion in Russia and such standard social characteristics as income, type of settlement and education. Despite the positive trend, Russia remains one of the countries with the highest abortion rates in the world. The country’s turn to traditional values and the allegedly growing role of religion are inadequate mechanisms to reduce abortions. Government support is given not to proven, evidence-based measures like the promotion of family planning, sex education, etc., but to repression and restrictions. During the past 10- 15 years, a number of restrictive amendments have been introduced into legislation. The authors indicate the counterproductive effects of these restrictions on abortion as an instrument of a pronatalist population policy. This article recommends paying more attention to improvements in the quality of abortion provision by the introduction of modern medical standards and protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Politics: What's the State Got to Do with It?
    Body politics: What's the state got to do with it? Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107357 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College, 2017 The work is licensed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc/4.0/). BODY POLITICS: WHAT’S THE STATE GOT TO DO WITH IT? Edited by Jordan A. Pino & Konstantinos Karamanakis BODY POLITICS “Whether meant to or not, law, in addition to all the other things it does, tells stories about the culture that helped to shape it and which it in turn helps to shape: stories about who we are, where we came from, and where we are going.” Mary Ann Glendon, Former Ambassador to the Holly See Body Politics: WHAT’S THE STATE GOT TO DO WITH IT? Jordan A. Pino Konstantinos Karamanakis Editors Eagle Print Collegiate Press Chestnut Hill This book was prepared by students in the Political Science Honors Seminar, Body Politics (Fall, 2016) at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts. Copyright in each chapter of the collective work is retained by the individual author. The work is licensed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This book is dedicated to our mentors in the Boston College Department of Political Science. Contents Chapter 1: Editors’ Preface 1 Konstantinos Karamanakis Jordan A. Pino Part I: Vulnerable Communities Chapter 2: Transgender Rights in Juridical Perspective 9 Jordan A.
    [Show full text]