Oxford University Labour Club TGM Trinity 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich
Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews. -
National Policy Forum (NPF) Report 2018
REPORT 2018 @LabPolicyForum #NPFConsultation2018 National Policy Forum Report 2018 XX National Policy Forum Report 2018 Contents NPF Elected Officers ....................................................................................................................4 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................5 About this document ...................................................................................................................6 Policy Commission Annual Reports Early Years, Education and Skills ............................................................................................7 Economy, Business and Trade ............................................................................................. 25 Environment, Energy and Culture ....................................................................................... 39 Health and Social Care ........................................................................................................... 55 Housing, Local Government and Transport ..................................................................... 71 International ............................................................................................................................. 83 Justice and Home Affairs ....................................................................................................... 99 Work, Pensions and Equality ..............................................................................................119 -
TUC London, East and South East
TUC London, East and South East Annual report 2018 . About the regional TUC ‘TUC: London East and the South East’ is the largest of the TUC’s regions and geographically we cover three European parliamentary constituencies or what were the government office regions: London, the South East, and East of England. Perhaps as many as two million trade unionists live and work within the region. Our regional council is appointed annually by trade our union affiliates and by county associations of trades councils. It meets four times a year to discuss both how to achieve policy determined at the annual national Trades Union Congress, and to make policies on issues specific to, or affecting, our region. At the regional council’s annual general meeting it elects its officers, and an executive committee that meets ten times a year. The officers and executive committee members serve for a year. Affiliated trade unions and county associations of trades councils also nominate to our industrial and equality sub-groups. These advisory sub-groups use their expertise, workplace and life experience to inform the activities of the regional council. In order to assist in our work fostering and supporting trade unionism in our region outside of London we have created the East of England Trade Union Network, EETUN, and the South East Trade Union Network, SETUN, within the structures of the regional TUC. Regional staff administer the regional council, deliver services to affiliates, represent the TUC in relations with public bodies, campaign for Congress policies, and support the delivery of learning and education to workers in the region. -
Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations
The University of Manchester Research Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Barclay, A., Sobolewska, M., & Ford, R. (2019). Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations. Electoral Studies, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Published in: Electoral Studies Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations. Andrew Barclay School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Maria Sobolewska School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Robert Ford School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Manuscript accepted for publication by Electoral Studies How to cite: Barclay, Andrew. Sobolewska, Maria. & Ford, Robert (2019) “Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations” Electoral Studies, 61 1 Political realignment of British Jews: testing competing explanations. -
New Peers Created Have Fallen from 244 Under David Cameron’S Six Years As Prime Minister to Only 37 to Date Under Theresa May
\ For more information on DeHavilland and how we can help with political monitoring, custom research and consultancy, contact: +44 (0)20 3033 3870 [email protected] Information Services Ltd 2018 0 www.dehavilland.co.uk INTRODUCTION & ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 2 CONSERVATIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Diana Barran MBE .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Garnier QC ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Haselhurst.................................................................................................................................. 7 The Rt. Hon. Peter Lilley ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Catherine Meyer CBE ................................................................................................................................................... 10 The Rt. Hon. Sir Eric Pickles ........................................................................................................................................ 11 The Rt. Hon. Sir John -
1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33. -
THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84. -
MINUTES and RECORD of the EXECUTIVE
MINUTES AND RECORD of the EXECUTIVE COUNCIL HELD AT UNITE HOUSE, HOLBORN, LONDON WC1 ON 14 TH , 15 TH , 16 TH & 17 TH MARCH 2016 PRESENT: MEMBERS: Sis. L ADAMS, Bros. J ALLAM, R ALLDAY, Sis. T ASHWORTH, Bros. D BANKS, D BOWYER, Sis. P BURR, Bros. E CASSIDY, D COLEMAN, J COOPER, G DEMPSEY, Sis. J DOUGLAS, J ELLIOT, Bros. P ENTWISTLE, M FORBES, J GILL, Sis. W GILLIGAN, Bros. A GREEN, S HIBBERT, A KHALIQ, M LYON, Sis. D McALLISTER, Bro. S McGOVERN, Sis. J McLEOD, Bros. S MILLER, J MITCHELL, T MITCHELL, Sis. T MOLONEY, Bros. I MONCKTON, F MORRIS, Sis . S MUNA, Bros. T MURPHY, J NEILL, Sis. K OSBORNE, S OWENS, B PLEASANTS, Bro. S ROSENTHAL, Sis. M RYAN, J SHEPHERD, Bro. K SMITH, Sis. J STEWART, J STILL, Bros. J STOREY, N STOTT, Sis. F SULLIVAN, J SURAYA, Bro. M TAJ, Sis. J TAYLOR, Bro. M THOMAS, Sis. A TOLMIE, Bros. H TURNER, P WELSH, D WHITNALL, D WILLIAMS, D WILSON, F WOOD, M WOOD, T WOODHOUSE EX OFFICIO: Bro. L McCLUSKEY (General Secretary) Bro. T BURKE (Assistant General Secretary) Sis. G CARTMAIL (Assistant General Secretary) Sis. I DYKES (Head of Constitutional Administration) Sis. D HOLLAND (Assistant General Secretary) Bro. A MURRAY (Chief of Staff) Bro. E SABISKY (Executive Director Finance, Property & Pensions) Bro. S TURNER (Assistant General Secretary) Bro. A WEIR (Assistant Chief of Staff) Sis. M BRAMBLE (Observer, Gibraltar) Bro. B SIMPSON (Young Members’ Observer) Bro. P WISEMAN (Retired Members’ Observer) IN THE CHAIR: Bro. T WOODHOUSE FIRST DAY, 14 TH MARCH 2016 ____________________________ EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MARCH 2016 The Chair welcomed the newly elected Territorial Representative from Scotland, Eddie Cassidy to the Executive Council. -
13651 20 Reproduced from Electronic Media, Promoted By
13651_20 Reproduced from electronic media, promoted by Jennie Formby, General Secretary, the Labour Party, on behalf of the Labour Party, both at, Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6QT. I want to start by thanking you for taking the time to respond to this consultation. Coronavirus is the biggest crisis our country has faced in a generation. It is a health crisis, an economic crisis and – for many – a personal crisis. Our immediate attention must be on responding to the pandemic and ensuring the health and safety of people across the country. In this context, it is appropriate that our policy-making in response to coronavirus is swift and responsive to the circumstances. But this is also an important moment of change for our country. The decisions made over the next five to ten years will fundamentally alter people’s lives for generations to come. It is therefore right that we pause and consider the context and values of our policies, as we look to build our policy platform over the coming years ahead of the next General Election. The Labour Party is an incredible and powerful force for good. But we’ve just lost four elections in a row. It is essential that we use the next few years to reconnect across the country, to re-engage with our communities and voters, to establish a coalition across our towns and our cities, regions and nations, to speak for the whole of the country. Policy development is central to that aim. I want this consultation to engage all parts of our Party in a broad discussion about our beliefs and principles, and the issues we all connect on. -
I Returned from the Party Conference in Brighton on Wednesday Evening
www.JohnCryerMP.co.uk I returned from the party conference in Brighton on Wednesday evening. Ed Miliband’s promise to freeze power prices has clearly had some impact. He has been attacked by many parts of the media and by the big six energy companies. The continuing refrain from metropolitan commentators is that this is “populist”. Well, if that means it’s popular then it’s perfectly true. A fairly high proportion of my correspondence at the moment from all parts of the constituency concerns rising energy prices. While publicly the government is rubbishing the pledge, privately they are wondering how they can counter it. As you know from previous reports, I think that we should also be committed to holding a referendum on EU membership. We cannot go into the elections next year without it when the other parties are promising a vote. There is now a growing campaign against the Lobbying Bill and I enclose recent interventions I made in the House of Commons which explain where I stand. I recently spoke at a rally at the gates of Whipps Cross Hospital in protest at what is looking like a threat to the hospital’s future. The recent prosecutions and damning report by the CQC are arousing suspicions as to the direction of a trust which is in deep financial trouble. As well as the usual surgeries, street surgeries and home visits. Best wishes, John 9 Sep 2013 : Column 682 Education Questions Topical Questions 9th September John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead) (Lab): How many civil servants at the Department for Education are working on the free schools programme? Michael Gove: More than 100 civil servants are working on the free schools programme—a testimony to its popularity. -
International Women's Day Marks the First Day of the Year Female
CULTURE: FOR PEACE AND SOCIALISM FULL MARX FOR THE AV FESTIVAL PAGE 25 £1 Thursday March 8 2018 Proudly owned by our readers | Incorporating the Daily Worker | Est 1930 | morningstaronline.co.uk INSIDE YOUR INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY EDITION WOMEN’S Louise Raw: p22 Militancy beyond myths Zita Holbourne: p15 Women and racism PAY BEGINS Gloria Mills: p10 Workplace inequality Bernadette Horton: p21 Working-class women Gail Cartmail: p10 Pregnancy discrimination TODAY Ruth Serwotka: p18 International Women’s Day marks the fi rst day New women’s movement of the year female workers ‘start getting paid’ Charlotte Hughes: p20 by Ceren Sagir TUC general secretary mark 100 years since some much pressure on “women to Frances O’Grady said: “Nearly 50 women were fi rst allowed to look good, be the perfect wife, Women tackling poverty years since the Ford machinists vote, women still face unac- the perfect mother and bring A WHOPPING gender pay gap went on strike at Dagenham, ceptable pay disparities.” home a salary. Men are not means that the average female the UK still has one of the worst Unison Wales also revealed judged in the same way and Karen Ingala Smith: p18 worker starts getting paid for gender pay gaps in Europe. today that 70 per cent of 150 the expectations and aspira- the year today — on Interna- “Women in the UK will only women polled did not believe tions we ask of them are much On domestic violence tional Women’s Day. start to get paid properly when equality in the workplace had lower.” TUC research revealed that we have better-paid part-time and been achieved, with more than Shadow women and equali- women work for free for more fl exible jobs. -
Equalities and HR Commission 2018 1 Unsigned
) [email protected] x +44 (0)330 822 0321 = www.antisemitism.uk Rebecca Hilsenrath Chief Executive Equality and Human Rights Commission Fleetbank House 2-6 Salisbury Square London EC4Y 8JX By post and e-mail 31st July 2018 Dear Ms Hilsenrath, We are writing to you regarding antisemitism in the Labour Party (“the Party”). The Party is established as an unincorporated association, governed by its rule book. It is therefore obliged by the provisions of the Equality Act 2010 (“the Act”) relating both to political parties and associations, as defined by section 107 of the Act. We wish to refer the Party to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (“the Commission”) on this basis that the Party has discriminated against Jewish members and/or associates contrary to sections 101(2)(d) and/or 101(3)(d) of the Act, and victimised members and/or associates who have spoken out against antisemitism, contrary to sections 101(6)(d) and/or 101(7)(d) of the Act. DISCRIMINATION The Party has become an association in which Jewish members and/or associates feel discriminated against to the extent that they feel compelled to leave it in significant numbers, both because the Party has discriminated against Jews by failing to act against antisemitic members and/or associates, and because the Party has failed to address complaints of antisemitism in a fair and efficient manner. We charge that the Party has, through years of deliberate or reckless dereliction of its duty to enforce its own rules, created an atmosphere in which Jewish members and/or associates are discriminated against.