DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Budget and Finance Committee Legislative Budget and Finance Committee A JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Offices: Room 400 • Finance Building • Harrisburg • Tel: (717) 783-1600 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8737 • Harrisburg, PA 17105-8737 Facsimile (717) 787-5487 SENATORS JOHN R. PIPPY Chairman GERALD J. LAVALLE Vice Chairman JAY COSTA, JR. ROBERT M. TOMLINSON ROBERT C. WONDERLING Economic Impact of the Proposed JOHN N. WOZNIAK Greater Hazleton Air Cargo Airport REPRESENTATIVES ROBERT W. GODSHALL Secretary DAVID K. LEVDANSKY Treasurer STEPHEN BARRAR H. SCOTT CONKLIN ANTHONY M. DELUCA T. MARK MUSTIO Conducted Pursuant to SR 2007-144 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PHILIP R. DURGIN CHIEF ANALYST JOHN H. ROWE, JR. June 2008 Economic Impact Of The Proposed Greater Hazleton Air Cargo Airport Prepared For: Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee June 2008 MARTIN ASSOCIATES WEBBER AIR CARGO Hazleton, PA Cargo Study TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW CHAPTER – 1 PROPOSED AIR CARGO AIRPORT MARKET ANALYSIS 1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 The Air Cargo Industry: Condition................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 The Air Cargo Industry: Components............................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.1 Integrators............................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3.2 All-Cargo Airlines .................................................................................................................. 1-7 1.3.3 Passenger & Combination Carriers ...................................................................................... 1-9 1.3.4 Freight Forwarders ............................................................................................................... 1-9 1.4 All-Cargo Airports ........................................................................................................................ 1-10 1.4.1 Fort Worth Alliance ............................................................................................................. 1-11 1.4.2 Rickenbacker International Airport (LCK)........................................................................... 1-13 1.4.3 Midamerica (St. Louis) Airport ............................................................................................ 1-14 1.4.4 North Carolina’s Global Transpark ..................................................................................... 1-15 1.4.5 Other North American All-Cargo Airports ........................................................................... 1-17 1.5 Regional Airports......................................................................................................................... 1-18 1.5.1 Regional Trends ................................................................................................................. 1-19 1.5.2 Carrier Composition............................................................................................................ 1-19 1.5.3 Other Regional Airports Offering Cargo Capacity .............................................................. 1-22 1.5.4 Other Regional Air Cargo Reports...................................................................................... 1-22 1.6 Forecasts..................................................................................................................................... 1-26 1.6.1 Overview............................................................................................................................. 1-26 1.6.2 Years One Through Five: Integrator Regional Hub Operation........................................... 1-28 1.6.3 Years Six Through Twenty: Diversification Of Carriers ...................................................... 1-29 1.7 Air Cargo Market Conclusions..................................................................................................... 1-34 CHAPTER – 2 AIR CARGO INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Infrastructure Requirements ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 Runway Length Analysis .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.3 Taxiways .................................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.4 NAVAIDS ................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.5 Apron ........................................................................................................................................ 2-5 2.2.6 Air Traffic Control Tower .......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.7 Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting Building and Equipment...................................................... 2-7 2.2.8 Snow Removal and Airport Maintenance Equipment Building ................................................ 2-7 2.2.9 Airport Administration Building ................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2.10 Aircraft Fueling ..................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.11 Aircraft De-icing ................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.12 Fencing and Security ........................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.13 Airport Access ...................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.14 Airport Utilities ...................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.3 Estimates of Probable Construction Costs ................................................................................... 2-9 2.4 Summary .................................................................................................................................... 2-13 Table of Contents June 2008 Hazleton, PA Cargo Study CHAPTER – 3 ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED HAZLETON CARGO AIRPORT 3.1 Overview and Approach ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Review of Developer Economic Impact Assumptions, Methodology and Results........................ 3-1 3.2.1 Review and Assessment of Developer Assumptions and Methodology in Developing Economic Impact Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Review of Developer Economic Impact Results ....................................................................... 3-4 3.2.3 Summary of Developer’s Economic Impact Analysis Methodology and Assumptions............. 3-5 3.3 Consultant’s Independent Economic Impact Analysis of Air Cargo Activity at the Proposed Hazleton Cargo Airport............................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.1 Consultant’s Approach to Airport Economic Impact Analyses.................................................. 3-6 3.3.2 Impact Structure........................................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.3 Methodology.............................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.3.4 Data Collection........................................................................................................................ 3-12 3.3.5 Comparison Of Consultant And Developer Air Cargo Impact Results ................................... 3-13 3.3.6 Summary Of Impacts Based On Consultant’s High Case Forecast ....................................... 3-16 3.3.7 Tax Impacts............................................................................................................................. 3-20 3.4 Economic Impacts Of Proposed Construction Activity................................................................ 3-20 3.5 Economic Impacts of Industrial Development of Adjacent Land................................................. 3-21 3.6 Summary of Economic Benefits to the Commonwealth.............................................................. 3-23 CHAPTER – 4 ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED HAZLETON CARGO AIRPORT 4.1 Transportation Impact Assessment............................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Background........................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Highways .............................................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.3 Railroads............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helicopter Inventory
    DELAWARE VALLEY Helicopter Inventory dDELAWARE VALLEY "REGl!.rpc PLANNING COMMISSION June 2019 03-42-0125-017-2016 5 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for a diverse nine-county region in two states: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and MD Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. • Baltimore DE dDELAWARE VALLEY DVRPC's vision for the Greater Philadelphia Region is a prosperous, innovative, equitable, "REGlyrpc resilient, and sustainable region that increases PLANNING COMMISSION mobility choices by investing in a safe and modern transportation system; that protects and preserves our natural resources while creating healthy communities; and that fosters greater opportunities for all. DVRPC's mission is to achieve this vision by convening the widest array of partners to inform and facilitate data-driven decision-making. We are engaged across the region, and strive to be leaders and innovators, exploring new ideas and creating best practices. TITLE VI COMPLIANCE I DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 7964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 7987, Executive Order 72898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC's website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications and other public documents can be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and in transit-accessible locations when possible. Auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: West Chester, PA Accident Number: NYC08FA261 Date & Time: 07/30/2008, 1830 EDT Registration: N333MY Aircraft: Eclipse Aviation Corporation EA500 Aircraft Damage: Substantial Defining Event: Landing area overshoot Injuries: 2 None Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal Analysis During landing at its home airport, the airplane overran the runway and traveled down a 40- foot embankment before coming to rest against trees and sustaining substantial damage. According to the pilot, his speed on approach was a little fast but he thought it was manageable. Recorded data from the accident airplane revealed that 20 seconds before touchdown, when the pilot selected flaps 30 (landing flaps) the airspeed was approximately 27 knots above the maximum flap extension speed, and as the airplane touched down its airspeed was approximately 14 knots higher than specified for landing. The runway had a displaced threshold with 3,097 feet of runway length available. Skid marks from the accident airplane began approximately 868 feet beyond the displaced threshold, and continued for about 2,229 feet until they left the paved portion of the runway. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: The pilot's failure to obtain the proper touchdown point, and his excessive airspeed on approach. Findings Aircraft Airspeed - Not attained/maintained (Cause) Personnel issues Aircraft control - Pilot (Cause) Incorrect action performance - Pilot (Cause) Page 1 of 9 Factual Information HISTORY OF FLIGHT On July 30, 2008, about 1832 eastern daylight time, an Eclipse Aviation Corporation EA500, N333MY, sustained substantial damage during a runway overrun while landing at Brandywine Airport (OQN), West Chester, Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report FINAL REPORT March 2010 By Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # 355I01 PROJECT # 071109 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-PA-2009-016-071109 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date March 2010 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Covalt, Maggie; Fisher, Monika; Hoerner, Todd; and Raczkowski, Laura 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 115 W. Main Street, Suite 400 11. Contract or Grant No. Urbana, IL 61801 355I01/ 071109 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Final Report Bureau of Planning and Research Commonwealth Keystone Building 400 North Street, 6th Floor 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Harrisburg, PA 17120-0064 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract As part of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) airport pavement management efforts, the Bureau of Aviation (BOA) retained Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. (APTech), assisted by DY Consultants, to evaluate the condition of the pavements at 95 public-use airports and heliports and to update their existing airport pavement management system (APMS) originally implemented in 2001. The results of this project are presented in this report and can be used by the BOA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to identify, prioritize, and schedule pavement maintenance and rehabilitation actions at these airports. During this project, the conditions of the pavements were assessed using the FAA pavement condition index (PCI) methodology – the industry standard in aviation for visually assessing the condition of pavements.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Order JO 7110.65X
    ORDER JO 7110.65X Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: October 12, 2017 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control This order prescribes air traffic control procedures and phraseology for use by personnel providing air traffic control services. Controllers are required to be familiar with the provisions of this order that pertain to their operational responsibilities and to exercise their best judgment if they encounter situations not covered by it. Original Signed By: Elizabeth L. Ray Elizabeth L. Ray Vice President, Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: August 17, 2017 Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, System Operations Services RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. JO 7110.65X CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS TO OPTIONAL TO OPTIONAL BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320−5 (6−80) USE PREVIOUS EDITION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.65X CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: September 13, 2018 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.65X, Air Traffic Control, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background.
    [Show full text]
  • KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
    KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report Volume II (2016)
    Volume II (Update 2016) Published in March 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6: Inventory and Airport Classification Update .................................................... 279 1. Summary of Changes ....................................................................................................... 279 2. Final Inventory and Airport Classification .......................................................................... 280 Chapter 7: System Requirements ........................................................................................ 290 Chapter Overview ................................................................................................................ 290 1. Current Airport System Performance ................................................................................ 291 2. Airport System Access ..................................................................................................... 315 3. Airport System Deficiencies and Constraints .................................................................... 323 Chapter 8: Implementation Plan........................................................................................... 328 Chapter Overview ................................................................................................................ 328 1. Core and System Airports in the SASP ............................................................................ 329 2. Airport System Priorities ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report FINAL REPORT March 2010 By Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # 355I01 PROJECT # 071109 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-PA-2009-016-071109 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date March 2010 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation Pavement Evaluation Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Covalt, Maggie; Fisher, Monika; Hoerner, Todd; and Raczkowski, Laura 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 115 W. Main Street, Suite 400 11. Contract or Grant No. Urbana, IL 61801 355I01/ 071109 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Final Report Bureau of Planning and Research Commonwealth Keystone Building 400 North Street, 6th Floor 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Harrisburg, PA 17120-0064 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract As part of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) airport pavement management efforts, the Bureau of Aviation (BOA) retained Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. (APTech), assisted by DY Consultants, to evaluate the condition of the pavements at 95 public-use airports and heliports and to update their existing airport pavement management system (APMS) originally implemented in 2001. The results of this project are presented in this report and can be used by the BOA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to identify, prioritize, and schedule pavement maintenance and rehabilitation actions at these airports. During this project, the conditions of the pavements were assessed using the FAA pavement condition index (PCI) methodology – the industry standard in aviation for visually assessing the condition of pavements.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER JO 7110.65Y Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: August 15, 2019
    ORDER JO 7110.65Y Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: August 15, 2019 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control This order prescribes air traffic control procedures and phraseology for use by personnel providing air traffic control services. Controllers are required to be familiar with the provisions of this order that pertain to their operational responsibilities and to exercise their best judgment if they encounter situations not covered by it. Angela McCullough Vice President, Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: ________________________ Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. JO 7110.65Y CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS TO OPTIONAL TO OPTIONAL BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320−5 (6−80) USE PREVIOUS EDITION 8/15/19 JO 7110.65Y Explanation of Changes Basic Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a. 1−1−9. REQUESTS FOR d. 2−6−2. PIREP SOLICITATION AND INTERPRETATION OR CLARIFICATIONS DISSEMINATION TO THIS ORDER This change incorporates language for the This change replaces the term “District Manager” categorization of PIREPs, adds a note emphasizing with “General Manager.” certain routine PIREPs, adds the phrase “cloud coverage” to subparagraph 2−6−2al, adds two b. 1−2−6. ABBREVIATIONS references to PIREP handling, and revises language for soliciting information about volcanic activity to This change reflects the implementation of the term align with other applicable FAA publications. RAPCON by United States Navy (USN) and United e. 4−7−12. AIRPORT CONDITIONS States Marine Corps (USMC) radar approach control facilities. It also reintroduces the term Army This change removes the ambiguous “en route Radar Approach Control (ARAC) into the descent” wording in the En Route portion of the Abbreviations Table and provides uniformity with paragraph and adds the option for En Route other air traffic orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Pilot
    PENNSYLVANIA PILOT Vol 12 No 1, Spring 2001 Published quarterly by the Aero Club of Pennsylvania for all those interested in aviation activities in Pennsylvania Bob Mills speaks; PA airports among ‘most needed airports’... MEMBER NEWS Bob Mills speaks at airports, but rather, key airports that Macarthur and Republic airports Aero Club Dinner represent the most vulnerable part of were also listed. The complete list is our national air transportation sys- available at www.nata-online.org. On December 17, the Aero Club tem. In assembling the list, NATA invited Bob Mills to speak at the established six criteria for airport FAA'S new shoulder Wright Brother’s Dinner. Bob, who nominations: forecast airport harness policy recently retired from the Philadelphia growth, utilization, regional signifi- Sea Plane Base, recounted his early If you own a small days in aviation. He talked about his Airport Flashback airplane that lacks time as a Naval aviator, as well as his shoulder harnesses, father’s days during the time of the FAA's widely Glenn Curtiss and the Wright anticipated policy Brothers. The FAA will honor Bob statement on certi- on March 28 at the Renaissance fying retrofit instal- Hotel. See page 7 for details. lations might help provide you with Aero Club honors Jeff some regulatory Kahn for his service relief. But that depends on your At the Wright Brother’s Dinner , Jeff particular installa- Kahn was presented with the Annual tion. The final poli- Wright Brother’s Award for his serv- cy statement con- Photo by P. Walsh ice as Secretary and general liaison in Remember me? This recent photo shows what used to be an air- tinues to require club activities.
    [Show full text]