25-01-2017 Avengpage.Qxd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Contempt and Public Interest
Contempt and Public Interest as an incidental but not intended Robin Bowiey, in this paper which received by-product, cause some likelihood an honourable mention in the 2005 CAM LA of prejudice to a person who hap pens at the time to be a litigant ...It Assay Prize, advocates dearer rules regarding is well settled that a person cannot be prevented by process of contempt sub judice contempt. from continuing to discuss publicly a matter which may fairly be regarded Introduction "The conflict between freedom of as one of public interest, by reason speech and the proper administra of the fact that the matter in ques The law of sub judice contempt strivesto tion of justice is most likely to arise tion has become the subject of litiga balance the right to freedom of speech when a media organisation pub tion."8 ' . and discussion of matters of public inter lishes material which may interfere Walker explains that until the High Court's est with the right for persons facing legal with the course of particular legal decision in Hinch, there was considerable proceedings to have a fair trial, unpreju proceedings. Typically, those respon uncertainty regarding the practical appli diced by media comment. Striking a sible will not intend to prejudice the cation of the Breadmakers principle, with balance between these two interests is proceedings. They may have been some courts viewing the principle as an a difficult task, which in Australia, has motivated solely by a desire to bring inflexible rule.9 In Hinch it was held that been addressed by the common law over to the attention of the public mat courts must engage in a "balancing exer time. -
Prospectus 2016-17
University of Hyderabad PROSPECTUS 2016-17 Online Registration Fee General Category : Rs. 350=00 OBC Category : Rs. 250=00 SC/ST/PWD Category: Rs. 150=00 UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD (A Central University established by an Act of Parliament) Visitor The President of India Chief Rector The Governor of Telangana Chancellor Dr. C. Rangarajan Vice-Chancellor Prof. Appa Rao Podile University’s Official Address: The University of Hyderabad Prof. C. R. Rao Road, P.O. Central University, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 046, Telangana, (India) University’s EPABX: 040-2313 0000 University’s Website: http://www.uohyd.ac.in/ University of Hyderabad PROSPECTUS 2016-17 P.O. Central University Hyderabad – 500 046 Telangana India Admission Enquiries: Joint Registrar (Acad. & Exams.) Tel. 040-2313 2102 Asst. Registrar (Academic) Tel. 040-2313 2103 Email: [email protected] Fax: 040 2301 0292 Online Registration Fee General Category : Rs. 350=00 OBC Category : Rs. 250=00 SC/ST/PWD Category: Rs. 150=00 UNIVERSITY OF EXCELLENCE To introduce the element of excellence in the University system, the University Grants Commission had identified a few Universities and granted them the status of ‘Universities with Potential for Excellence’. Based on the evaluation and recommendations of a committee, the University Grants Commission declared the University of Hyderabad a ‘University with Potential for Excellence’. The University was sanctioned a grant of Rs.30 crore under UPE Phase – 1 under this scheme for Interfacial Studies & Research and Holistic Development for a period of 5 years (2002-2007) and Rs.50 crore under the Phase - 2 (2012-2016). Now the University has been declared a “University of Excellence” Awarded top grade by NAAC The University opted for a rigorous evaluation by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) of the University Grants Commission. -
Challenges to the Sub Judice Rule in South Africa
Page 1 of 9 Original Research Challenges to the sub judice rule in South Africa Author: As a lawyer, it is a privilege to contribute to this Festschrift in honour of Professor Doctor Johan Kobus van Rooyen1, 2 Buitendag. His entire career has been a quest for the truth. In the process, he has fearlessly rejected political agendas based on the Bible, and has inspired countless students in their Affiliations: 1Faculty of Law, University of quest to serve God in a practical and humane manner. His published research as well as the Pretoria, South Africa output of his doctoral students, both present and past, bear witness to a life dedicated to the search for knowledge in the service of God. He has also assisted substantially in placing South 2Faculty of Theology, African theological research on the international map. In a sense, this article which deals with University of Pretoria, South Africa the protection of the right to a fair trial of an accused, also acknowledges Johan Buitendag’s quest for justice for all South Africans, whatever their creed, gender, race or standing. The Note: subject of my article demonstrates my own quest to promote the constitutional right of an Chair, Broadcasting accused to a fair trial, a right that should not be subject to inordinate pressure by the media, Complaints Commission of South Africa (1993−); and which gives priority to the right of an accused to be presumed innocent: an accused who Emeritus Professor of Law, may frequently suffer loneliness and a sense of rejection. Related to that it is, of course, always University of Pretoria; important to bear in mind that freedom of expression is at the heart of our democracy. -
JUSTICE MATTERS Independence, Accountability and the Irish Judiciary TANYA WARD
JUSTICE MATTERS Independence, Accountability and the Irish Judiciary TANYA WARD 22473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio1473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio1 1 111/07/20071/07/2007 111:26:561:26:56 Th e Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) is Ireland’s leading independent human rights watchdog, which monitors, educates and campaigns in order to secure full enjoyment of human rights for everyone. ABOUT THE AUTHOR: TANYA WARD is Senior Research and Policy Offi cer with the Irish Council for Civil Liberties. 22473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio2473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio2 2 111/07/20071/07/2007 111:26:581:26:58 CONTENTS ABOUT THE ICCL 5 SECTION 4 Personal Independence and the Irish Judiciary 45 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 4.1 Introduction 46 4.2 Appointments 46 4.2.1 Selection and Criteria 46 SECTION 1 Introduction 9 4.2.2 Th e Judicial Advisory Appointments Board 1.1. Introduction 10 (JAAB) 50 1.2. Aims and Objectives of Study 12 4.3 Conditions of Service and Tenure 54 1.3. Methodology 13 4.4 Adequate Remuneration 56 1.4. Report Outline 14 4.5 Freedom of Expression and Association 57 4.5.1 Representation and Association 57 4.5.2 Extra-Judicial Comment and Educating SECTION 2 International Human Rights the Public 58 Standards on Judicial Independence and 4.6 Competence, Diligence and Judicial Studies 60 Impartiality 15 4.6.1 Judicial Studies in Ireland 60 2.1 Introduction 16 4.6.2 Induction 62 2.2 What is Judicial Independence? 16 4.6.3 Human Rights Education 63 2.3 What is Judicial Impartiality? 18 4.6.4 Further Academic Studies 65 2.4 International -
Upholding the Integrity of Our Justice System and Balancing Rights
UPHOLDING THE INTEGRITY OF OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND BALANCING RIGHTS A note from Indranee Rajah S.C., Senior Minister of State for Law The Administration of Justice (Protection) Act was enacted by Parliament on 15 August 2016. • The Act can be found at statutes.agc.gov.sg. • The Minister for Law’s Second Reading (2R) speech can be found at www.mlaw.gov.sg. With the Act, the law of contempt of court is now written into statute. Contempt of court has always existed at common law in Singapore. However it was the only non-statute based criminal law, an observation by former Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong, which prompted the review that led to the Act that has just been passed. Under the common law, there were also no upper limits on the punishment that could be meted out. The Act: • maintains the existing law of contempt, save for one change; • introduces a new procedural mechanism to deal with contemptuous publications in the social media age; and • imposes limits on the maximum punishment. Putting contempt law into statutory form makes it clearer and defines its boundaries. This is important given the penal consequences for contempt. PURPOSE AND INTENT Singapore adheres strongly to the rule of law. The laws against contempt of court ensure fair and effective justice, and protect the integrity of our legal institutions. They balance free speech with an individual’s right to a fair trial and ensure that court orders are complied with. All these are critical to maintaining societal order. The law of contempt falls into four broad categories:- • Scandalising the Court – this prevents baseless attacks against our judges. -
Passengers Arriving from 7 Countries to Be Quarantined
Follow us on: @TheDailyPioneer facebook.com/dailypioneer RNI No. TELENG/2018/76469 Established 1864 Published From ANALYSIS 7 MONEY 8 SPORTS 12 HYDERABAD DELHI LUCKNOW CAUGHT IN A WPI INFLATION AT 2.26 PC IN DOUBTS GROW IN BHOPAL RAIPUR CHANDIGARH CLEFT STICK JAPAN OVER OLYMPICS BHUBANESWAR RANCHI DEHRADUN FEB AS FOOD ITEMS CHEAPER VIJAYAWADA ` *LATE CITY VOL. 2 ISSUE 156 HYDERABAD, TUESDAY MARCH 17, 2020; PAGES 12 3 *Air Surcharge Extra if Applicable RAMYA AS A POLITICAL LEADER { Page 11 } www.dailypioneer.com WORLDWORLDWORLD INININ LOCKDOWNLOCKDOWNLOCKDOWN n LOCKDOWNS AND ENTRY BANS IMPOSED AROUND THE WORLD TO FIGHT CORONAVIRUS n EMPTY STREETS ACROSS 100 COUNTRIES, THOUSANDS OF FLIGHTS GROUNDED fforts to contain the All of Pope Francis' Easter spread of coronavirus services next month will be held Ebecame more frantic on without the faithful attending, Monday as France and Spain the Vatican said on Sunday, a joined Italy in imposing lock- downs on tens of millions of step unprecedented in modern people, Australia ordered self- times. isolation of arriving foreigners and other countries extended entry bans. Panic buying in Australia, the United States and Britain saw leaders appeal for calm over the virus that has infected over 156,000 people globally and killed more than 5,800. Several countries imp- osed bans on mass gather- ing, shuttered sporting, cul- EIFFEL TOWER IN PARIS tural and religious events, imported China tightened checks on THE GRAND MOSQUE IN MECCA while medical experts urged cases. Aust- international travellers arriving people to practice "social dis- ralia's latest at Beijing airport on Sunday, tancing" to curb the spread. -
CHAPTER—26 General Rules of Procedure
CHAPTER—26 General Rules of Procedure Notices General procedure very matter proposed to be raised in the House by a member, whether E is in the form of a question, resolution, motion, Bill, amendment, or otherwise, requires notice. Every notice, required by the rules has to be given in writing addressed to the Secretary-General and signed by the member giving notice and has to be delivered at the Notice Office between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m.1 every day except Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday.2 Notices left or received after 4.00 p.m. on any open day, or left on any day when the Notice Office is closed are treated as given on the next open day3 but subsequently modified for different classes of business as notified in Bulletin Part-II prior to the commencement of every session.4 Notices may be delivered by members personally or through messengers and can also be sent by post. The Rules Committee was of the view that the notices/communications received through Fax should be treated as authentic notices/ communications provided that they were signed and followed by written notices.5 At the stage of adoption of the report, the House, however, did not accept the Committee’s recommendation.6 For the convenience of members, in addition to the box kept outside the Notice Office, another box is kept at the Rajya Sabha Reception Counter in the main Reception Hall of the Parliament House, for enabling the personal staff of members to deposit notices of questions, motions, resolutions, etc. -
(Southern Region), CHENNAI Recruitment to the Post of Multi
Staff Selection Commission (Southern Region), CHENNAI Recruitment to the post of Multi-Tasking (Non-Technical) Staff in different states and union territories 2011 List of ONLINE applications rejected ( in Registration Number order) Registration No. Name of the applicant DOB Father's Name Reason for rejection of application 51100000174 SURYARASHMI 22111985 RAVINDRANATH P Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100000259 VIJAY CHANDRA KIRAN P 14101980 P C RAMULU Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100003622 RAJENDER ANNAVENA 24041984 JANARDHAN Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100004876 B DEVADANAM 08101980 B SATYA BABU Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100006417 RAGHU PIDUGURALLA 03051980 RAMAMURTHY Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100006557 RONANKI HARISANKAR 01061982 VALLABHARAO Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100007369 PERUMALLA ANIL 01051984 PRAKASHAM He / She has send morethan 1 application for the above examination with 2 different centres in violations of the declaration given by him/her in 51100009181 SATHIYAMOORTHI V 13061981 VARADARAJ M Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100009636 FREDRIC STANLEY 25101982 VISWANATHAN Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100011136 SHINURAJ R 31051985 RAJENDRAN PILLAI Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100011441 S SRIDEVI 01041985 S N MURTHY Overaged as on 31/12/2010 Wednesday, February 09, 2011 Page 1 of 155 Registration No. Name of the applicant DOB Father's Name Reason for rejection of application 51100013327 BHUVANESWARI 30081985 GURUVENKATARAMANAN Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100013924 SWAPNA G 25061985 SOMIREDDY Overaged as on 31/12/2010 51100016741 P -
SCC File No. 37112 in the SUPREME COURT of CANADA
S.C.C. File No. 37112 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ONTARIO) BETWEEN: JOSEPH PETER PAUL GROIA APPELLANT (Appellant) -and- THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA RESPONDENT (Respondent) -and- DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SASKATCHEWAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, LAW SOCIETY TRIBUNAL, ADVOCATES’ SOCIETY, BARREAU DU QUEBEC, CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION, BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT CRIMINAL DEFENCE ADVOCACY SOCIETY, FEDERATION OF LAW SOCIETIES OF CANADA, ONTARIO CROWN ATTORNEYS’ ASSOCIATION, ONTARIO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION, CRIMINAL LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO INTERVENERS FACTUM OF THE INTERVENER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SASKATCHEWAN (Pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP ATTORNEY GENERAL 160 Elgin Street GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN Suite 2600 820 – 1874 Scarth Street OTTAWA ON K1P 1C3 REGINA SK S4P 4B3 D. Lynne Watt Sharon H. Pratchler, Q.C. Tel: (613) 786-0171 Tel: (306) 787-5584 Fax: (613) 788-3587 Fax: (306) 787-9111 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Ottawa agent to Counsel for the Intervener Counsel for the Intervenor, Attorney General Attorney General of Saskatchewan of Saskatchewan - i - LERNERS LLP GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP 130 Adelaide Street West 160 Elgin Street Suite 2400 Suite 2600 TORONTO ON M5H 3P5 OTTAWA ON K1P 1C3 Earl A. Cherniak, Q.C. (9113C) Jeffrey W. Beedell Tel: (416) 601-2350 Tel: (613) 786-0171 Fax: (416) 867-2402 Fax: (613) 788-3587 Email: [email protected] Email: jeff.beedell @gowlingwlg.com Counsel for the Appellant, Joseph Peter Paul Ottawa Agent to Counsel for the Appellant, Groia Joseph Peter Paul Groia LENCZNER SLAGHT ROYCE SMITH DENTONS CANADA LLP GRIFFIN LLP 99 Bank Street, Suite 1420 Suite 2600 OTTAWA ON K1P 1H4 130 Adelaide Street West TORONTO ON M5H 3P5 David R. -
20Years of Sahmat.Pdf
SAHMAT – 20 Years 1 SAHMAT 20 YEARS 1989-2009 A Document of Activities and Statements 2 PUBLICATIONS SAHMAT – 20 YEARS, 1989-2009 A Document of Activities and Statements © SAHMAT, 2009 ISBN: 978-81-86219-90-4 Rs. 250 Cover design: Ram Rahman Printed by: Creative Advertisers & Printers New Delhi Ph: 98110 04852 Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust 29 Ferozeshah Road New Delhi 110 001 Tel: (011) 2307 0787, 2338 1276 E-mail: [email protected] www.sahmat.org SAHMAT – 20 Years 3 4 PUBLICATIONS SAHMAT – 20 Years 5 Safdar Hashmi 1954–1989 Twenty years ago, on 1 January 1989, Safdar Hashmi was fatally attacked in broad daylight while performing a street play in Sahibabad, a working-class area just outside Delhi. Political activist, actor, playwright and poet, Safdar had been deeply committed, like so many young men and women of his generation, to the anti-imperialist, secular and egalitarian values that were woven into the rich fabric of the nation’s liberation struggle. Safdar moved closer to the Left, eventually joining the CPI(M), to pursue his goal of being part of a social order worthy of a free people. Tragically, it would be of the manner of his death at the hands of a politically patronised mafia that would single him out. The spontaneous, nationwide wave of revulsion, grief and resistance aroused by his brutal murder transformed him into a powerful symbol of the very values that had been sought to be crushed by his death. Such a death belongs to the revolutionary martyr. 6 PUBLICATIONS Safdar was thirty-four years old when he died. -
2013 MFA Painting/Print Making/Sculpture
B - 31 Entrance Examinations, February 2013 MFA Painting/Print Making/Sculpture Maximum Marks ,5o Time : 2 Hours Hall Ticket No. General Instructions : 1. Write your Hall Ticket Number in the OMR Answer Sheet and also write the Hall Ticket Number in the space provided above. 2. This paper consists ,A' ,Bn. .question of Two Parts - Part and part part-A of the question paper consists of 25 questions of one mark each. a J. Answers are to be marked on the OMR answer sheet following the instructions provided thereupon. 5. There is negative marking for a wrong answer in Part-A only. Each wrong answer carries -0.33 mark. 6. Hand over the oMR answer sheet at the end of the examination to the Invigilator. 7. No additional sheets will be provided. Rough work can be done in the question paper itself. b-> I UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAI) Department of Fine Arts MFA Painting/Printmaking/Sculpture Total Marks 56: (1X50) Date:2610212013 Time: 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm Instructions , The question paper consists of two parts (part A and part B). Part A has 25 questions with negative marking of 0.33 for each for every wrong answer of one mark question. lart B has 25 questions with NO NEGATIVE marking. For each question, there shall be four answers and the-answers are to be indicated with capital letters of alphabets viz., A, Bn C and D. Part A 25 Questions with Negative Marking I Name the capital of the Vijayanagara dynasty. A. Mathura B. Tanjore C. Hampi D. -
Contempt of Court
III. CONTEMPT OF COURT Linda Fuerst* A. Introduction Critics have condemned the power to punish for contempt in Canada as "antiquated and autocratic",' "remedial and coercive", 2 and 3 "complex and ill-defined". While not all have been so harsh, most agree that the law in its present state is vague, confusing and in need of reform. 4 The contempt provisions in Bill C-19 5 address many defects in the current law. The most significant revision is the amendment of section 8 of the Criminal Code, 6 abolishing the common law power of judges to punish for contempt.' The Bill adopts the recommendation made by the Law Reform Commission of Canada that steps be taken to eliminate the anomaly created by section 8 and to enumerate and define the forms of criminal contempt. Section 8 would be amended to restrict liability to one of three offences created in the Code, 9 with the exception of the power to impose punishment for non-compliance with a judicial order in a civil matter.' 0 * Law Reform Commission of Canada. This article does not necessarily reflect the Commission's views. 1 Cavanaugh, Civil Liberties and the Criminal Contempt Power. 19 CRIM. L.Q. 349, at 361 (1977). 2 Watkins, The Enforcement of Conjrmity to Law Through Contempt Proceed- ings, 5 OSGOODE HALL L.J. 125, at 139 (1967). 3 Speech by The Honourable Mark MacGuigan, Lawyers' Club of Toronto Meeting, 9 Jan. 1984. 4 See Coveney, Contempt of Court: Bulvark of Freedom or Lynch-Pin of Tyranny?, 13 WESTERN ONT. L. REV.