DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Statement New York City Department of Environmental Protection PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING OF FLUSHING BAY PER ADMINISTRASTIVE ORDER OF CONSENT (CO2-20110512-25) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT December 2012 Table of Contents Flushing Bay Enviromental Assessment Statement Full Form Attachment A: Enviromental Assessment Statement Section A: Project Description ................................................................................................... 1 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................. 3 Proposed Project ...................................................................................................................... 4 Elements of Proposed Project ................................................................................................. 5 Project Schedule ...................................................................................................................... 8 Required Permits and Approvals ........................................................................................... 11 Section A-1: EAS Screening Analysis ......................................................................................... 13 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 13 B. Screened Technical Areas ................................................................................................. 12 Community Facilities and Services ....................................................................................... 13 Shadows ................................................................................................................................ 14 Historic and Cultural Resources ............................................................................................ 14 Urban Design and Visual Resources ..................................................................................... 14 Water and Sewer Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 14 Solid Waste and Sanitation Services ..................................................................................... 14 Energy ................................................................................................................................... 15 Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 15 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................ 15 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................... 16 Noise ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Public Health ......................................................................................................................... 16 Neighborhood Character ....................................................................................................... 16 Growth Inducing Aspects ...................................................................................................... 16 Section B: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy.................................................................... 18 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 18 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 18 C. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................... 19 Land and Water Uses ............................................................................................................ 19 Zoning ................................................................................................................................... 21 Public Policy ......................................................................................................................... 22 D. Future Without the Proposed Project ................................................................................ 24 Land and Water Uses ............................................................................................................ 24 i December 2012 Flushing Bay Environmental Dredging Project Zoning .................................................................................................................................... 25 Public Policy .......................................................................................................................... 26 E. Future With the Proposed Project ..................................................................................... 26 Land and Water Uses ............................................................................................................. 26 Zoning .................................................................................................................................... 28 Public Policy .......................................................................................................................... 28 Section B-1: Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency ................................................ 30 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 30 B. Consistency Assessment ................................................................................................... 30 Section C: Socioeconomic Conditions ..................................................................................... 38 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 38 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 38 C. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................... 39 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 39 Marina Uses and Activities .................................................................................................... 39 Study Area Upland Businesses .............................................................................................. 42 D. Future Without the Proposed Project ................................................................................ 42 Proposed Project Area ........................................................................................................... 42 Adjacent Area ........................................................................................................................ 42 Study Area ............................................................................................................................. 42 E. Future With the Proposed Project ..................................................................................... 42 Direct Business Displacement ............................................................................................... 42 Indirect Business Displacement ............................................................................................. 43 Public Policy .......................................................................................................................... 43 Section D: Open Space .............................................................................................................. 45 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 45 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 45 Preliminary Assessment ........................................................................................................ 45 Study Area Delineation ......................................................................................................... 46 Census Data ........................................................................................................................... 46 Data Inventory ....................................................................................................................... 46 Open Space Ratios and Planning Standards .......................................................................... 47 C. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................... 47 Study Area Population ........................................................................................................... 47 Open Space Resources ........................................................................................................... 48 D. Future Without the Proposed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metropolitan Airport News | September 2019
    www.MetroAirportNews.com Serving the Airport Workforce and Local Communities September 2019 The Port Authority announced on August 21st INSIDE THIS ISSUE LaGuardia Airport Earns that LaGuardia Airport’s Terminal B has been awarded the Envision Platinum award from First-Ever Platinum Award The Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Terminal B Project is First to Achieve Highest Recognition (ISI) for its environmentally conscious con- struction. The Envision Platinum is the highest from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure level of recognition within ISI’s awards program. “The Port Authority has taken aggressive steps to achieve sustainable growth, promote 03 environmental efficiency, and reduce the envi- ronmental impact of aviation on our host com- 2019 USO of Metropolitan NY munities and the region,” said Port Authority Check Presentation Ceremony Chairman Kevin O’Toole. “We look forward to continuing to work with our stakeholders and partners to design and build state-of-the-art facilities that meet and exceed modern envi- ronmental standards.” “As the first transportation agency to em- brace the Paris Climate Agreement, the Port Authority is committed to best practices in re- ducing its carbon footprint at the brand-new Continued On Page 4 12 JFK Airport Number One In Amenities In Recent Survey Lysa Scully Retiring After High Flying Years At Port Authority From Port Authority’s PA News, we learn that LGA General Manager Is Retiring After 33-Year Agency Career After 33 high-flying years of Port Authority will continue to benefit the traveling public, service, Lysa Scully, General Manager of La- our airports, and the region that she proudly Guardia Airport, will be retiring on September served.
    [Show full text]
  • CSO-LTCP Flushing Bay Final LTCP
    CSO Long Term Control Plan II Long Term Control Plan Flushing Bay TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Goal Statement ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Requirements (Federal, State, Local) ........................................................... 1-2 1.3 LTCP Planning Approach ................................................................................................ 1-3 2.0 WATERSHED/WATERBODY CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................2-1 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Waterbody Characteristics ............................................................................................. 2-33 3.0 CSO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...................................................................3-1 3.1 Collection System Maintenance and Inspection Program ............................................... 3-3 3.2 Maximizing Use of Collection System for Storage ........................................................... 3-3 3.3 Maximizing Wet Weather Flow to WWTPs ...................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Wet Weather Operating Plan ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Police Academy – College Point, Queens CHAPTER 2: LAND USE, ZONING, & PUBLIC POLICY
    Police Academy – College Point, Queens CHAPTER 2: LAND USE, ZONING, & PUBLIC POLICY A. INTRODUCTION A detailed assessment of land use, zoning, and public policy is appropriate if a Proposed Action would result in a significant change in land use or would substantially affect regulations or policies governing land use. Under City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual guidelines, an assessment of zoning is typically performed in conjunction with a land use analysis when the action would change the zoning on the site or result in the loss of a particular use. Similar to zoning, some assessment of public policy typically accompanies an assessment of land use. Under CEQR, a land use analysis characterizes the uses and development trends in the study area, and assesses whether a Proposed Action is compatible with or may affect those conditions. The Proposed Action involves a site selection of a public facility to facilitate the construction of a new Police Academy. A new Academy would allow the NYPD to consolidate many of their current training facilities, which are currently spread throughout the City, into one central location. The directly affected area (“site” or “proposed development site”), located in the College Point neighborhood of Queens, encompasses approximately 35 acres and consists of the following parcels: Block 4321, Lot 48; Block 4323, Lot 19; Block 4324, Lot 1; Block 4325, Lot 1; Block 4326, Lot 1; Block 4327, part of Lot 1; Block 4328, part of Lot 1; Block 4329, Lots 1, 7, 10, and 75; Block 4301, part of Lot 1; Block 4359, part of Lot 1; Block 4358, part of Lot 1; Block 4357, part of Lot 1; Block 4356, part of Lot 30; and Block 4354, Lot 50.1 As discussed in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” the proposed Academy consists of approximately 2.4 million gsf, including academic space, physical training facilities, administrative and support components, an indoor pistol range, a field house, a tactical village, a drivers training course, a police museum, and a visiting housing/lecture housing facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
    Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses whether any changed background conditions or the differences between the reasonable worst-case development scenario (RWCDS) and the program assessed in the 2008 Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS) and subsequent technical memoranda would result in any significant adverse impacts on land use, zoning, and public policy that were not addressed in the 2008 FGEIS and subsequent technical memoranda. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Consistent with the 2008 FGEIS and subsequent technical memoranda, this analysis finds that the proposed project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to land use, zoning, or public policy. As anticipated in the 2008 FGEIS, the proposed project would dramatically change land uses in the Special Willets Point District by replacing predominantly low-density, auto-related, and industrial uses with a new mixed-use neighborhood. The proposed project also would constitute a significant change for the Willets West portion of the project site by replacing a surface parking field with a new entertainment and retail center of approximately 1.4 million gross square feet (gsf) (approximately one million square feet (sf) of gross leasable area). New structured parking facilities would be built on the South Lot and Lot D to accommodate a portion of the parking for Mets patrons relocated from the Willets West surface parking field. The potential future development of Lot B is the same as projected in the 2008 FGEIS. While the proposed project would result in significant land use changes on the project site, the effects of this change would not be adverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Opens Their First New Concourse at Laguardia Airport
    www.MetroAirportNews.com Serving the Airport Workforce and Local Communities November 2019 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Delta Opens Their First New Concourse at LaGuardia Airport Delta Air Lines celebrated the opening of the first concourse to comprise Delta's new state- of-the-art, $3.9 billion terminal at LaGuardia Airport. New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Port Authority Executive Director 05 Rick Cotton and Delta CEO Ed Bastian were on hand in addition to many community leaders, Our Lady of the Skies union workers and Delta employees. 64th Annual Luncheon at The historic infrastructure project under- JFK International Airport way at LaGuardia builds on Delta’s years of in- vestment in New York. Delta operates more than 275 peak-day departures from its LGA hub. The construction began to replace Termi- nals C and D in August 2017. When complete, the new terminal will feature 37 gates across four concourses connected by a centralized check-in lobby, security checkpoint, and bag- gage claim; dual taxilanes that will help reduce hold outs and taxi times; larger gate areas and 11 more concessions space; and a new, larger Delta Sky Club with a Sky Deck. of Flushing Bay and CitiField and is designed to airport areas in Central Terminal. All termi- The Silver Wings Convention The new G Concourse is impressive with a allow maximum light into the space creating a nals and concourses will be connected via an Gathers at the TWA Hotel variety of restaurants and shops, comfortable very open and airy feel. Ultimately this con- air train which is in the planning stage regard- gate seating and beautiful bathrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Willets Point Work for New York
    MMaakkiinngg WWiilllleettss PPooiinntt WWoorrkk ffoorr NNeeww YYoorrkk A plan for neighborhood success February 2008 1 Making Willets Point Work for New York A Plan for Neighborhood Success Principal Authors: Contributors: Elena Conte Justin Kray Alyssa Katz Patricia Voltolini Brad Lander Vicki Weiner Mercedes Narciso Alex Zamudio Making Willets Point Work for New York 2 COLLABORATORS This report was prepared by the Pratt Center for Community Development and is the result of extensive conversations over several months involving several hundred residents of the communities surrounding Willets Point (especially Corona, Flushing, Jackson Heights and East Elmhurst), workers and business owners from the site itself, and a wide range of community, housing, and labor organizations, based on a set of principles that were developed by Councilmembers Hiram Monserrate, John Liu and Tony Avella, Queens for Affordable Housing, ACORN, UNITE HERE and the Pratt Center. The conversations took place in the communities surrounding Willets Point, and were hosted both by the overall coalition, as well as at the initiative of Councilmember Monserrate, and individual community-based organizations (see attachment A). Each section of this report contains a description of community input based on discussion of the suggested principles, as well as background information about the proposed project and the issue. The recommendations combine explicit community requests from the process along with best practices based on the Pratt Center’s knowledge of planning processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Flushing Bay CSO LTCP Final
    CSO Long Term Control Plan II Long Term Control Plan Flushing Bay TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Goal Statement ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Requirements (Federal, State, Local) ........................................................... 1-2 1.3 LTCP Planning Approach ................................................................................................ 1-3 2.0 WATERSHED/WATERBODY CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................2-1 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Waterbody Characteristics ............................................................................................. 2-33 3.0 CSO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...................................................................3-1 3.1 Collection System Maintenance and Inspection Program ............................................... 3-3 3.2 Maximizing Use of Collection System for Storage ........................................................... 3-3 3.3 Maximizing Wet Weather Flow to WWTPs ...................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Wet Weather Operating Plan ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Willets Point Development Plan Economic Center
    Chapter 3: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION The proposed Plan would significantly change land use on the Willets Point peninsula by transforming a largely underutilized site with substantial environmental degradation into a lively, mixed-use, sustainable community and regional destination. Willets Point is located at the nexus of the commercial, entertainment, cultural, and recreational regional destinations of Downtown Flushing, Shea Stadium, and Flushing Meadows-Corona Park. The Willets Point Development District (the District) is located between several major arterial highways, including the Van Wyck Expressway, the Grand Central Parkway, and Northern Boulevard, and is located in close proximity to the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and the No. 7 subway line, as well as LaGuardia Airport. The proposed Plan would facilitate the development of a regional economic center containing up to 8.94 million gross square feet (gsf) of new buildings, which would include residential, retail, a hotel and convention center, office space, community facilities, and open space (see Chapter 2, “Procedural and Analytical Framework,” for a detailed description of the proposed Plan). A new connection between the Van Wyck Expressway and the northeastern portion of the District would facilitate the movement of traffic into and out of the District. Because this is a major land use plan situated in a key location in Queens, the potential for impacts on land use in the District and in the surrounding area and neighborhoods is an important consideration in this Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS). The proposed Plan also involves issues relating to public policy. The City’s Plan for Willets Point represents a critical step in implementing the Downtown Flushing Development Framework, a land use and economic planning strategy for the growth of Downtown Flushing, the Flushing River waterfront, and the Willets Point peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2018 Melinda Katz
    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2018 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 190 countries and speaking more than 200 languages.1 The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population.2 Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest population of residents born outside the United States in the entire city.3 Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28.9% of the Borough,4 indicating a need for a wide and growing range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Office of the Queens Borough President actively works with the Queens General Assembly and the Immigration Task Force, two working groups organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of the issues that the immigrant community faces. As an extension of this work, the Office of the Queens Borough President launched “Know Your Rights Week,” a series of weeks dedicated to providing free legal assistance and consultation. The first “Know Your Rights Week” series focused on immigration legal services.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety Answering Center Ii
    Police Academy – College Point, Queens CHAPTER 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. INTRODUCTION The New York City Police Department (NYPD or “the Department”) is proposing to construct a new Police Academy to incorporate many of the NYPD’s existing training facilities throughout the City of New York (“the City”) into one consolidated campus, which would be located on approximately 35 acres of City-owned land in College Point, Queens (see Figure 1-1, “Project Site Location Map”). The proposed action would allow for the development of a modern academic and physical training complex, to be operated by the NYPD, which would consolidate in a single campus facilities for recruits, civilians, and active (in service) police officers that are currently spread across the City. The total development size would consist of approximately 2.4 million gross square feet (gsf) of built space and would include indoor training facilities, classrooms, and related support space, an indoor firearms training facility, a tactical village, an indoor track, a police museum, a visiting police/lecturer lodging facility and an above-grade parking facility to accommodate on-site parking demand (“proposed Academy” or “proposed development”). The proposed Academy site the majority of which is the Department’s College Point vehicle impoundment (“Tow Pound”) site is identified by several different addresses, including: 26-02 Ulmer Street, and 28-11 28th Avenue1. Located in the College Point, Queens section of Community District 7, the proposed development would be located on a portion of the block bounded by 28th Avenue to the north, Ulmer Street and the Southbound Whitestone Expressway Service Road to the east, 31st Avenue to the South, and College Point Boulevard to the west (see Figure 1-1 for the proposed Site boundaries).
    [Show full text]