DOCSLIB.ORG

Weekly Construction Law Review Selected from Our Daily Bulletins Covering Construction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weekly Construction Law Review Selected from Our Daily Bulletins Covering Construction Friday, 21 February 2020 Weekly Construction Law Review Selected from our Daily Bulletins covering Construction Search Engine Click here to access our search engine facility to search legal issues, case names, courts and judges. Simply type in a keyword or phrase and all relevant cases that we have reported in Benchmark since its inception in June 2007 will be available with links to each case. Executive Summary (1 minute read) Commissioner of Taxation v Scone Race Club Limited (FCAFC) - superannuation - taxation - employment - respondent not liable to pay 'superannuation guarantee charge' to jockeys - appeal dismissed Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane (No 2) (FCA) - administrative law - constitutional law - criminal law - applicant challenged warrant issued to Agent of Australian Federal Police under s3E Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - application dismissed Super Vision Resources Ltd v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd (NSWSC) - conveyancing - plaintiff sought to set aside second defendant’s sale of properties to first defendant under s37A Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) - proceedings dismissed United Petroleum Australia Pty Ltd v Herbert Smith Freehills (VSCA) - retainer - solicitors' costs - costs - indemnity costs - leave to appeal in respect of 'fees proceeding' refused - appeals against costs orders dismissed Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited & Ors v The Treasurer, Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships and Minister for Sport (QCA) - administrative law - refusal to grant declaration that Minister had adopted method of calculation incapable of satisfying requirement of s148(1)(a) Petroleum and Gas (Royalty) Regulation 2004 (Qld) - appeal dismissed Georgopoulos & Anor v Normetals Pty Ltd (SASC) - conversion - thief stole appellants' items and sold items to respondent - appellants' conversion claim upheld against respondent - appeal Page 1 against assessment of damages allowed Cornwall v Jenkins as Trustee for the iSpin Family Trust (ACTCA) - negligence - appellant injured while participating in “aerial sling” 'fitness class' - respondent liable - appeal allowed Malhi v Antonijevic (ACTSC) - negligence - transcript - claim arising from respondent's fall from taxi - Magistrate found in respondent's favour - error in transcript - appeal allowed Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read) Commissioner of Taxation v Scone Race Club Limited [2019] FCAFC 225 Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia Griffiths, Derrington & Steward JJ Superannuation - taxation - Court allowed respondent’s appeal against objection decision concerning assessments under Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) (SGA Act) for 'relevant period' - primary judge found appellant erred in determining respondent was employer of jockeys during relevant period and liable to pay 'superannuation guarantee charge' under ss5 & 6 Superannuation Guarantee Charge Act 1992 (Cth) - primary judge found respondent was not jockeys' employer within meaning of s12(8)(a) SGA Act during relevant period - appellant appealed - held: appeal dismissed. Commissioner [From Benchmark Thursday, 20 February 2020] Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane (No 2) [2020] FCA 133 Federal Court of Australia Abraham J Administrative law - constitutional law - criminal law - evidence - applicant challenged warrant issued to Agent of Australian Federal Police (AFP) - relief sought pursuant to s39B Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and s5 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) - warrant issued under s3E Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - warrant authorised search at applicant’s premises ’for certain evidential material’ - applicant contended s3E Crimes Act did not authorise issue of search warrant ’in circumstances that disproportionately burden the implied constitutional freedom of discussion of government and political matters’ - applicant also contended warrant did not comply with ss3E(1), 3E(5)(c) & 3E(5)(a) Crimes Act, that warrant misdescribed offences in ss73A(1) & 73A(2) Defence Act 1903 amounting to non-compliance with ss3E(1) & 3(5)(a) Crimes Act - applicant also contended that both AFP’s decision to seek warrant and Registrar’s decision to issue it were ’legally unreasonable’ - ’journalist privilege’ - s126K Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) - held: challenges to search warrant failed - application dismissed. Australian Broadcasting Corporation [From Benchmark Wednesday, 19 February 2020] Page 2 Super Vision Resources Ltd v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 65 Supreme Court of New South Wales Stevenson J Conveyancing - second defendant sold properties he owned to first defendant - plaintiff was ’prospective creditor’ of second defendant - plaintiff, under s37A Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), sought declarations second defendant’s sales of properties to first defendant were void on basis sales were alienations by second defendant with intention to defraud creditors - whether second defendant alienated interest in properties “with intent to defraud [his] creditors” - whether plaintiff “thereby prejudiced” and had standing to seek that transactions be set aside - whether first defendant was “purchaser in good faith” - held: second defendant admitted he alienated interest in properties “with intent to defraud [his] creditors” - plaintiff was not a “person thereby prejudiced” - first defendant was purchaser in good faith - proceedings dismissed. View Decision [From Benchmark Monday, 17 February 2020] United Petroleum Australia Pty Ltd v Herbert Smith Freehills [2020] VSCA 15 Court of Appeal of Victoria Whelan, McLeish & Niall JJA Retainer - solicitors' costs - costs - indemnity costs - respondent provided application with legal services - respondent sued applicant for 'outstanding professional fees' ('fees proceeding') - applicants sued respondent in negligence - respondent succeeded in each proceeding - applicant sought to appeal against judgment in fees proceeding on basis judge did not identify 'relevant retainer' - 'two potential retainers' (2014 retainer and 2016 retainer) - 2016 retainer not signed by clients - applicants also sought to appeal against 'special costs orders' - whether judge correctly found 2016 retainer was binding agreement - whether respondent precluded from recovery of costs because respondent 'acted for itself in the proceeding' - whether erroneous exercise of discretion to make orders for indemnity costs - Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow (2019) 93 ALJR 1007 - held: leave to appeal in fees proceeding refused - appeals in relation to costs dismissed. United Petroleum [From Benchmark Thursday, 20 February 2020] Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited & Ors v The Treasurer, Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships and Minister for Sport [2020] QCA 15 Court of Appeal of Queensland Morrison & Philippides JJA; Mullins AJA Administrative law - first appellant obliged to pay royalty under Petroleum and Gas (Royalty) Regulation 2004 (Qld) (Regulation) - royalty assessed under s147C Regulation “at the rate of 10% of the wellhead value of the petroleum disposed of ... during a royalty return period” - first appellant sought decision from Minister concerning component under s148(1)(a) of Regulation Page 3 of wellhead value of petroleum to be calculated - Minister gave decision, adopting “Netback Method of calculation - Minister's decision found invalid but primary judge refused first appellant's application for declaration Minister 'had adopted a method which was not capable of determining' what Regulation required - “the amount that the petroleum could reasonably be expected to realise if it was sold on a commercial basis” - held: appeal dismissed. Australia Pacific [From Benchmark Monday, 17 February 2020] Georgopoulos & Anor v Normetals Pty Ltd [2020] SASC 18 Supreme Court of South Australia Lovell J Conversion - unknown thief broke into appellants' 'storage/work depot' and stole items - thief assumed identity of 'local builder' and sold items to respondent as 'scrap metal' - some property was located at 'scrap metal yard' of respondent but some property already 'sold or crushed' - appellants claimed conversion against respondent - respondent admitted receiving 'some but not all' items - Magistrate found for appellants and awarded damages in sum less than sought by appellants - appellants appealed against damages' quantum - respondent cross-appealed, alleged Magistrate had erred in finding respondent received all items - respondent also challenged damages' quantum - held: appellants' appeal against assessment of damages allowed - cross-appeal dismissed. Georgopoulos [From Benchmark Monday, 17 February 2020] Cornwall v Jenkins as Trustee for the iSpin Family Trust [2020] ACTCA 2 Court of Appeal of the Australian Capital Territory Burns & Loukas-Karlsson JJ; Crowe AJ Negligence - appellant injured while participating in “aerial sling” 'fitness class' - respondent ran fitness class and occupied premises - appellant sued respondent in negligence - primary judge gave judgment for respondent, finding evidence did not reveal breach of duty by respondent - appellant appealed - appellant 'in essence' submitted primary judge erred in finding no breach of care by respondent by failure to require appellant to use 'crash mat', and erred in alternative finding that any breach had not caused appellant's injuries - respondent conceded appellant's contention that primary judge had erred in 'assuming past economic loss' - held: breach of duty established - factual causation established - damages reduced by one third for contributory negligence - judgment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Petroleum Retail Fuel Outlets Compliance Activity Outcomes
    United Petroleum retail fuel outlets: Summary of compliance activity outcomes April 2017 © Commonwealth of Australia 2017 Background The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) and its predecessor agencies have received a number of requests for assistance from United Petroleum franchise and commission agent employees. On 3 September 2015, a media article was published containing allegations United Petroleum employees were underpaid minimum hourly rates, in some cases receiving as low as $10 an hour. These allegations were consistent with the pattern of requests for assistance received by the FWO, and as a result, a broader compliance activity (the Activity) was undertaken to assess United Petroleum retail fuel outlets compliance with Commonwealth workplace laws. Consistent with other significant compliance activities involving franchise networks, the Activity assessed the levels of compliance by United Petroleum, its associated entities, franchisees and commission agents. During the Activity, United Petroleum operated a 100% franchise and commission agent model. Approximately 40 of their 440 outlets were franchised and the remainder operated as commission agents. However United Petroleum has since informed the FWO of its intention to move away from a franchise model and operate stores through commission agents, the company directly or on a supply-only basis in the future. United Petroleum [ACN 085 779 255] is based in Abbotsford Victoria, and is an Australian owned proprietary company first registered in 1999. United Petroleum does not operate any retail fuel sites itself and does not directly enter into the franchise or commission agent agreements. That role is performed by United Petroleum Franchise [ACN 127 764 989], an associated entity also based in Abbotsford.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Biofuels Annual Australia
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 8/15/2017 GAIN Report Number: AS1712 Australia Biofuels Annual 2017 Approved By: Sarah Hanson, Agricultural Counselor Prepared By: Roger Farrell, Agricultural Specialist Report Highlights: The Australian biofuel industry and market remain small because mandates do not cover the entire country and remain modest compared to other countries with biofuel programs, and tax relief alone has not boosted biofuel use. With minimal mandate support, biodiesel production and imports have collapsed since 2014 due to lower world crude oil prices and high feedstock prices. Total biofuel production for 2017 is estimated at 290 million liters (ML), comprised of 250 million ML of fuel ethanol and a sharply reduced 40 million ML of biodiesel. Production of fuel ethanol has declined less (just over 15 percent since 2013) because of its value as an oxygenate in gasoline, and it is supported by a mandate in New South Wales (NSW) and a new 2017 mandate in Queensland. Second-generation biofuels, such as energy crops and algae-based fuels, have been successfully tested but are not yet commercially viable. However, the Queensland government has provided support for an advanced biofuels plant to produce fuel for military, aviation and marine applications. Post: Canberra I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Australia is a major importer of crude oil and refined products for transport fuels; although overall it is a leading international exporter of energy. There has been a continued decline in domestic refining capacity for transport fuels and a significant rise in import dependence, with 85 per cent of refinery feedstock and 45 per cent of refined production consumption now met from imports.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Transcript Tuesday 5 May 2020 Litchfield Room
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY 13th Assembly PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE Public Hearing Transcript Tuesday 5 May 2020 Litchfield Room Members: Mrs Kate Worden MLA, Chair, Member for Sanderson Mr Gerry Wood MLA, Member for Nelson Mr Terry Mills MLA, Deputy Chair, Member for Blain Mr Tony Sievers MLA, Member for Brennan Mr Gary Higgins MLA, Member for Daly (via videoconference) Witnesses: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Mr Matthew Schroder, General Manager, Infrastructure and Transport – Access and Pricing Mr Gary Dobinson, Director, Fuel Prices and Market Analysis Automobile Association of the Northern Territory Mr Anthony Hill, Chief Executive Officer Mr Edon Bell, Senior Manager – Operations Puma Energy Australia Mr Steve Niebling, Fuel Pricing Manager Mr Alan Plews, General Manager – Retail Mr Mark McKenzie, Chief Executive Officer, Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association United Petroleum PTY LTD Mr David Szymczak, Chief Operating Officer Viva Energy Ms Megan Foster, Executive General Manager, Consumer Ms Edwina Pribyl, Head of External Communications FuelXpress Mr Mark McKenzie, Chief Executive Officer, Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association Vopak Mr Mark Haggerty, Commercial and Business Development Manager Mr Fulco van Geuns, Managing Director Mr Paul Birch, Terminal Manager, Darwin Caltex Australia Mr Prasad Kholkute, Head of Retail Pricing Mr Todd Loydell, Head of Government Affairs Public Accounts Committee – Tuesday 5 May 2020 The committee convened at 9.00 am. PUBLIC HEARING ON NORTHERN TERRITORY FUEL PRICES Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Madam CHAIR: On behalf of the committee I welcome everyone to this public hearing into Northern Territory fuel prices. I welcome to the table to give evidence to the committee Mr Matthew Schroder, General Manager, Infrastructure and Transport - Access and Pricing from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of the Australian Petroleum Industry
    Monitoring of the Australian petroleum industry: Monitoring of the Australian petroleum Report of the ACCC into the prices, costs and prots of unleaded petrol in Australia of unleaded petrol Report of the ACCC into prices, costs and prots Monitoring of the Australian petroleum industry Report of the ACCC into the prices, costs and prots of unleaded petrol in Australia DECEMBER 2009 www.accc.gov.au December 2009 Monitoring of the Australian petroleum industry Report of the ACCC into the prices, costs and profi ts of unleaded petrol in Australia DECEMBER 2009 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 23 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 First published by the ACCC 2009 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Director Publishing, ACCC, GPO Box 3131, Canberra ACT 2601, or [email protected]. Important notice The information in this publication is for general guidance only. It does not constitute legal or other professional advice, and should not be relied on as a statement of the law in any jurisdiction. Because it is intended only as a general guide, it may contain generalisations. You should obtain professional advice if you have any specifi c concern. The ACCC has made every reasonable effort to provide current and accurate information, but it does not make any guarantees regarding the accuracy, currency or completeness of that information.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Petroleum Exploration Association Limited Members of the Professional Division
    AUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION ASSOCIATION LIMITED MEMBERS OF THE PROFESSIONAL DIVISION New South Wales Nate Affiliation Name Affiliation Nand Affiliation D. Esso Abbott. Earl O. Continental Gerrard. M. J. Beaver McEvoy. McGarry. D. 1. Australian Oil & Gas Agnew. J. D. Inter. Oil & Minerals Ins. Gidley. P. R. McGee. J. B. Arco Andrejewskis. A. J. Ampol Glucksnrann. D. A. G. H. Andresen. Finn Target Goddard. G. G. Zapata McIntosh. McKay. B. G. Esso Angus. A. L Macdonald. Wagner & Priddle Graham. Miss B. McWilliams, F. W. Continental Armstrobng. R. A. Burmah Graham. T. APEA Mahoney. M. J. Auchincloss. G. Greases. S. R. Manhoff, C. N. Esso Bain. J. S. Esso Grand. R. B. Continental J. Marshall, A. J. Pacmines Barr. J. R. Garrett Lance & Co. Guest. D. W. J. & North Consultants Matzkows. A. L. PI B Bartlett. R. J. Esso Hackfonh-Jones. Paul BCA Management Maughan. D. M. Esso Beddoes. L. R.. Jnr. Hall, H. E Burmah Maxwell. W. G. H. Appraisals Mining & Geological Bein. J. Esso Hall. J. R. Aust. Groundwater Consultants Melzer, A. D. Tricentrol Bichan. H. K. Robertson Research Hall. P. C. Esso Meyer, R. R. Bros Biggers. G. C. Esso Hall. R. G. William Meyers. N. A. Birmingham. P. J. Esso Hall. R. K. Oil Drilling & Exploration Milne. N. F. Burmah Black. J. R. Faso Hammaa. H. R. Ayrshire Exploration Miskelly. N. Ord. Minnest. T. J. Thompson & Ptnrs Blau. E_ J. Burmah Hancock. R. A. W. Es so Blanden. I. D. Esso Harrington. H. J. University of New England Moffett. A. Blunter. J. M. Beaver Harris, A. G. Bridge Montano, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Import Infrastructure in Australia
    Petroleum import infrastructure in Australia Main report Prepared for the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism August 2009 Reliance and Disclaimer The professional analysis and advice in this report has been prepared by ACIL Tasman for the exclusive use of the party or parties to whom it is addressed (the addressee) and for the purposes specified in it. This report is supplied in good faith and reflects the knowledge, expertise and experience of the consultants involved. The report must not be published, quoted or disseminated to any other party without ACIL Tasman‘s prior written consent. ACIL Tasman accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of reliance on the report, other than the addressee. In conducting the analysis in this report ACIL Tasman has endeavoured to use what it considers is the best information available at the date of publication, including information supplied by the addressee. Unless stated otherwise, ACIL Tasman does not warrant the accuracy of any forecast or prediction in the report. Although ACIL Tasman exercises reasonable care when making forecasts or predictions, factors in the process, such as future market behaviour, are inherently uncertain and cannot be forecast or predicted reliably. ACIL Tasman shall not be liable in respect of any claim arising out of the failure of a client investment to perform to the advantage of the client or to the advantage of the client to the degree suggested or assumed in any advice or forecast given by ACIL Tasman. © ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd This work is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Cover Sheet Crib Point Inquiry and Advisory Committee EES 2902
    Submission Cover Sheet Crib Point Inquiry and Advisory Committee EES 2902 Request to be heard?: No - but please email me a Full Name: Amelia Hardy Organisation: Address of affected property: Attachment 1: Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Submission: The morning peninsula and it’s life needs to be protected. Submission Cover Sheet Crib Point Inquiry and Advisory Committee EES 2903 Request to be heard?: No Full Name: Jeannine Wilson Organisation: Address of affected property: Crib Point Attachment 1: submission.pdf Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Submission: As attached My name is Jeannine Wilson and I live in the Westernport Bay area. I’ve lived in Finders for nearly 50 years and appreciated its natural beauty. I’ve spent 30 years teaching the importance of marine life in Westernport and volunteered for marine and migratory bird research in Westernport. I’ve been involved in these educational activities because I believe the in the intrinsic value of all marine organisms to the well being of our marine environment especially the mangroves and wetlands which provide a defence against rising sea levels and are significant in the sequestering of carbon. I thank the Crib Point Inquiry and Advisory Committee and the Minister for Planning for the opportunity to make a submission to the environment assessment of the Crib Point gas import jetty and gas pipeline project. There are a variety of issues which should deem this proposal unacceptable under its current form and that I will point to in my submission but the issue that concerns me most is the negative impact on greenhouse gas emissions in Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report, October 2006.Pdf 1.07 Mb
    Environment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry into the Production and/or Use of Biofuels in Victoria October 2006 Inquiry into the Production and/or Use of Biofuels in Victoria Report of the Environment and Natural Resources Committee on the Inquiry into the Production and/or Use of Biofuels in Victoria ORDERED TO BE PRINTED Victorian Government Printer 2006 Parliamentary Paper No. 242 Session 2003-2006 i Parliament of Victoria Environment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry into the Production and/or Use of Biofuels in Victoria ISBN - 0-9757811-2-X This report is printed on recycled paper. Table of Contents Committee Members .......................................................................................... vii The Environment and Natural Resources Committee...................................... ix Terms of Reference ............................................................................................. xi Chair’s Foreword ............................................................................................... xiii Executive Summary ........................................................................xv Table of Recommendations.............................................................................. xix Table of Findings............................................................................................... xxi Abbreviations................................................................................................... xxiii Chapter One: Introduction ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Woolworths' Retail Service Station Sites
    BP PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF WOOLWORTHS’ RETAIL SERVICE STATION SITES Submission April 2017 Table of contents Introduction 4 Section One: Consumer fuel buying behaviour 6 1.1 Overview 6 1.2 Selection of service stations 7 1.3 The use of discount vouchers 7 1.4 Fuel use and reasons for selection 7 Section Two: Answers to consultation questions 8 2.1 Competition between fuel retailers 8 2.2 Local competition 9 2.3 Regular retail price cycles 10 2.4 Barriers to entry 11 2.5 Other potential competition issues 11 Appendix A: RACV Feedback 12 A.1 RACV Member Engagement 12 A.2 Milemaker Study 12 A.3 Answers to ACCC consultation questions 13 Appendix B: RAA Feedback 14 B.1 Introduction 14 B.2 Member Advocacy Survey 14 B.3 Answers to ACCC consultation questions 22 Appendix C: RACT Feedback 23 C.1 Introduction 23 C.2 Pricing 23 C.3 Impact on other business and competition in Tasmania 24 C.4 Answers to ACCC consultation questions 24 AAA 2 BP proposed acquisition of Woolworths’ service stations: April 2017 Appendix D: AANT Feedback 26 D.1 Introduction 26 D.2 Answers to ACCC consultation questions 26 Footnotes 27 AAA 3 BP proposed acquisition of Woolworths’ service stations: April 2017 Introduction The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) thanks the Australian Competition Consumer Commission (ACCC) for the opportunity to provide feedback in relation to the proposed acquisition of Woolworths Limited’s network of retail service station sites by BP Australia Pty Ltd (the proposed acquisition). The AAA is the peak organisation for Australia’s motoring clubs and their eight million members.
    [Show full text]
  • APEC Biofuels Transportation and Distribution Infrastructure
    Biofuel Transportation and Distribution Options for APEC Economies APEC Energy Working Group APEC Biofuels Task Force May 2011 1 APEC Project EWG 20/2009 Produced by BBI Biofuels Canada P.O. Box 205 Delaware, Ontario Canada N0L 1E0 Telephone: (519)203-2191 Fax: (519) 488-3621 For Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2011 APEC Secretariat APEC#211-RE-01.4 2 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by APEC. Neither BBI Biofuels Canada nor any of its employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by BBI Biofuels Canada. 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 BIOFUEL TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 20, 2019 UNITED PETROLEUM- HOLIDAY
    UNITED PETROLEUM- HOLIDAY GIVEAWAY The following terms and conditions (Terms and Conditions) apply for your chance to win the prizes on offer (the Promotion). By submitting an entry into the Promotion, the entrant warrants that they have read, understood and accepted these Terms and Conditions. 1. The promoter of the Promotion is United Petroleum Pty Ltd ACN 085 779 255 whose principal office is at United Petroleum Headquarters, 600 Glenferrie Rd, HAWTHORN VIC AUSTRALIA 3122 (Promoter). 2. The promotion commences at 12.01am Thursday 28th March 2019 and concludes at 11.59pm Wednesday 1st May 2019 (Promotional Period). Entries are deemed received at the time of receipt by the promoter in its promotional database and not at the time of transmission by the entrant. 3. The Promoter reserves the right, at any time, to verify the validity of entries and entrants (including any entrant’s identity, age and place of residence) and to disqualify any entrant who submits an entry that is not in accordance with these Terms and Conditions, who tampers with the entry process or who submits an Entry that the Promoter, in its sole discretion, deems to be offensive, inappropriate, defamatory or otherwise not in keeping with the spirit of the Promotion. 4. Errors and omissions may be accepted at the Promoter’s discretion. Failure by the Promoter to enforce any of its rights at any stage does not constitute a waiver of those rights. Incomplete, indecipherable, or illegible Entries will be deemed invalid. 5. A person may enter the Promotion as many times as they like, with multiple receipt numbers but will only be eligible to win one prize.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ethanol and Other Biofuels Mandate) Amendment Bill 2015
    Parliamentary Liquid Fuel Supply (Ethanol and Other Biofuels Mandate) Amendment Bill 2015 Report No. 8, 55th Parliament Utilities, Science and Innovation Committee November 2015 Liquid Fuel Supply (Ethanol and Other Biofuels Mandate) Amendment Bill 2015 Report No. 8, 55th Parliament Utilities, Science and Innovation Committee November 2015 Utilities, Science and Innovation Committee Chair Mr Shane King MP, Member for Kallangur Deputy Chair Mr Robert Molhoek MP, Member for Southport Members Mr Don Brown MP, Member for Capalaba Mr Jason Costigan MP, Member for Whitsunday Mr Dale Last MP, Member for Burdekin Mr Chris Whiting MP, Member for Murrumba Committee Staff Ms Kate McGuckin, Research Director Ms Rachelle Stacey, Principal Research Officer Ms Lisa Van Der Kley, Executive Assistant Ms Julie Fidler, Executive Assistant Technical Scrutiny Ms Renee Easten, Research Director Secretariat Mr Michael Gorringe, Principal Research Officer Ms Kellie Moule, Principal Research Officer Ms Tamara Vitale, Executive Assistant Contact Details Utilities, Science and Innovation Committee Parliament House Cnr George and Alice Streets Brisbane Qld 4000 Telephone +61 7 3553 6633 Fax +67 7 3553 6639 Email [email protected] Web www.parliament.qld.gov.au/usic Acknowledgements The Committee acknowledges the assistance provided by the Department of Energy and Water Supply, the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection and the Queensland Parliamentary Library. Liquid Fuel Supply (Ethanol and Other Biofuels Mandate) Amendment Bill 2015 Contents Abbreviations 3 Glossary 4 Chair’s foreword 5 Recommendations 6 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Role of the Committee 8 1.2 Inquiry process 8 1.3 Objectives of the Bill 8 1.4 Consultation on the Bill 9 Committee comment 10 1.5 Should the Bill be passed? 10 2.
    [Show full text]