DOCSLIB.ORG

Income Instability and the Response of the Safety Net

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Income Instability and the Response of the Safety Net INCOME INSTABILITY AND THE RESPONSE OF THE SAFETY NET BRADLEY L. HARDY∗ This paper examines the response of safety net transfer and tax programs to earnings and income shocks across recessions since the early 1980s. Safety net programs in the United States are designed to dampen economic instability and maintain basic needs for families. Such programs, including TANF, SNAP (food stamps), and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), have been tested during and between recessions of the past 30 years, including the recent 2007–2009 Great Recession. I use matched data in the March Current Population Survey (CPS) from 1980 to 2012 to estimate pre- and post-transfer income instability over the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, as well as across recessions. The results are disaggregated by family structure, race, income, and education. Transfer programs are associated with lowered instability levels and fatter trend growth from 1980 to 2012 among socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroups, while the tax system reduces income instability for families in the top 40th percentile of the income distribution. Although the largest instability reductions occur among the poor, since 1980 the safety net appears less responsive to instability for the bottom income quintile, female-headed families, and black families. (JEL I38, J63) I. INTRODUCTION and Unemployment Insurance. Whether within or between recessions, programs like these are The Great Recession and fnancial crisis of designed to absorb negative economic shocks, 2007–2009 tested the capabilities of fscal and but much of the evidence surrounding safety net monetary policy in the United States and through- effectiveness focuses on income, employment, out Organization for Economic Co-operation and and poverty levels;lessemphasishaspreviously Development (OECD) countries (Elsby, Hobijn, been given to understanding the stabilization and Sahin 2010). In the United States, unem- or smoothing of incomes via multiple transfer ployment peaked at 10% in October 2010 (BLS programs, especially among socioeconomically 2012) and poverty rates rose to 15% by 2011, disadvantaged groups (Ben-Shalom, Mofftt, with even higher poverty among children, racial, and Scholz 2012; Larrimore, Burkhauser, and and ethnic minorities (DeNavas-Walt and Proctor Armour 2014; Shaefer and Edin 2013). 2014). The size of the Great Recession motivated This paper provides new information on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act effectiveness of social safety net programs as (ARRA) of 2009, an $833 billion fscal stim- buffers against earnings and income changes,or ulus of elevated spending and tax cuts (CBO 2012) that boosted spending on “safety net” transfer programs including the Supplemental ABBREVIATIONS Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (food AFDC: Aid to Families with Dependent Children stamps), the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), ARRA: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act CPS: Current Population Survey EITC: Earned Income Tax Credit ∗I thank Maureen Pirog, Yonaton Ben-Shalom, James GDP: Gross Domestic Product P. Ziliak, William Spriggs, Arloc Sherman, Thomas DeLeire, OECD: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Charles Hokayem, two anonymous referees, and conference Development participants at the 2012 APPAM meetings and the 2015 Indi- PRWORA: Personal Responsibility and Work ana University SPEA Conference "Federal, State, and Local Opportunity Reconciliation Act Budgets in Jeopardy: A Conference on America’s Future" for PSID: Panel Study of Income Dynamics valuable feedback. Hardy: Assistant Professor, Department of Public Adminis- SIPP: Survey of Income and Program Participation tration & Policy, American University, Washington, DC. SNAP: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Phone 1 202 885 3881, Fax 1 202 885 2347, E-mail TANF: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families [email protected] 1 doi:10.1111/coep.12187 Contemporary Economic Policy (ISSN 1465-7287) ©2016WesternEconomicAssociationInternational 2CONTEMPORARYECONOMICPOLICY instability. Using data from the Current Popula- consumption as a consequence of unstable and tion Survey (CPS), I calculate income instability hard-to-predict income (Attanasio and Weber from 1980 to 2012 across family structure, race, 2010). For socioeconomically disadvantaged income, and educational attainment to highlight families lacking precautionary savings or easy socioeconomic groups historically at higher access to loanable funds (Gottschalk and Mof- risk for poverty. I focus on business cycles to ftt 2009), safety net programs may improve highlight the role and importance of safety net economic well-being by insuring against expo- programs during periods of relative economic sure to involuntary economic instability. For hardship, but I also fnd and report persistently example, programs such as SNAP, the EITC, high income instability between recessions for Unemployment Insurance, and public housing socioeconomically disadvantaged families. To may allow families to better maintain food, measure instability, I construct three defnitions housing, and education consumption patterns in of income: (1) income without safety net transfer response to income shocks and uncertainty. In the spending programs or taxes, (2) income inclu- absence of such insurance mechanisms, income sive of safety net transfer spending programs, instability could harm the individual earner and and (3) income inclusive of safety net transfer their family via diminished child well-being, spending programs and taxes. Using these def- human capital investment, and development initions, I follow CBO (2007), Dahl, DeLeire, (Attanasio and Weber 2010; Gennetian et al. and Schwabish (2011), and Ziliak, Hardy, and 2015; Hardy 2014; Hill et al. 2013). Again, this Bollinger (2011), defning income instability as may be especially true for socioeconomically the standard deviation of the arc percent income disadvantaged families, already at a relatively change using the defnitions described above to higher risk of unemployment and poverty expo- test the collective income-smoothing characteris- sure (Hardy 2012; Keys 2008; Ziliak, Hardy, and tics of transfer programs and the tax system, the Bollinger 2011). way families practically experience the safety net (Currie 2006). B. Measurement and Evidence of Income Across all U.S. families, transfer programs Instability lower family income instability by 18% since the early 1980s, and the trend after accounting for the The measure of instability used in this study safety net is relatively stable toward the end of is the standard deviation of the 2-year arc percent the 2000s. For lower and middle income families, change of family income. To utilize this measure, as well as those headed by a high school gradu- Imatchsurvey-respondentsintheCPStocre- ate, the transfer and tax system effectively halts ate 2-year longitudinal panels (Ziliak, Hardy, and the growth in instability during the late 2000s. Bollinger 2011). This, along with the relatively Although safety net transfer programs lower the larger sample sizes of the CPS, allows me to level of instability, over a 30-year period there is compare the income-smoothing benefts of anti- evidence of a decline in the responsiveness of the poverty programs and tax policies across fam- U.S. safety net to rising instability over time for ily structure, race, income, and education. Many female-headed families, black families, and fam- earnings and income instability studies have used ilies in the bottom income quintile. longitudinal data in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) due to the literature’s early emphasis on decomposing instability into its per- II. BACKGROUND ON INCOME INSTABILITY manent and transitory components (Cameron and AND THE SAFETY NET Tracy 1998; Celik et al. 2012; Dahl, DeLeire, and Schwabish 2011; Gittleman and Joyce 1996; A. Policy Relevance Gottschalk and Mofftt 1994; Juhn and McCue Income instability occurs via workers’ fuctu- 2010; Winship 2009). By using the CPS, the ating earnings and incomes, and is largely driven larger sample sizes of the 2-year matched pseudo- by labor force exits (Ziliak, Hardy, and Bollinger panel data allow me to examine trends across 2011). Regarding the policy signifcance of socioeconomic subgroups with greater precision instability, constant relative risk aversion utility relative to traditional panel data sets in which sub- models show that individuals experience lowered group sample sizes are oftentimes small. utility in the event of unstable income and seek As a summary measure, income instability insurance against the risk from such instability; captures permanent shifts related to structural theoretical models consequently predict lowered change alongside transitory shocks more likely HARDY: INCOME INSTABILITY AND THE SAFETY NET 3 related to job loss, as well as any nonseparabili- Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996—also ties that might drive both theoretical components. known as Welfare Reform—direct assistance for Income instability, vit,isdefnedasthestandard the poor and near-poor has steadily shifted away deviation of the arc percent change: from cash assistance to SNAP and refundable tax credits, particularly the EITC (Danziger 2010; Guzman, Pirog, and Seefeldt 2013). SNAP (1) vit = Var 100 ∗ yit − yit−1 ∕yi provides near-cash assistance for low-income √ where yit is income{ for person[( i in time) t ]}(CBO families by subsidizing food purchases. Mean- 2007; Dahl, DeLeire, and Schwabish 2011; while, the EITC operates through the tax code to Dynan, Elmendorf, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Magazine of the Opportunity & Inclusive
    INTERVIEW: Sandra Black on Unequal Opportunities and the Cost of Bad Policy AFTER GEORGE FLOYD: Will Economics Change? A Call to Action from William Spriggs DATA DIVE: Looking at COVID-19's Disparities FALL 2020 THE MAGAZINE OF THE OPPORTUNITY & INCLUSIVE GROWTH INSTITUTE Sophie Ọṣọtimẹhin, Associate Professor, Université du Québec à Montréal and Institute FALL 2020 / FOR SeniorALL ScholarC1 2 UPDATE For All With funding and student well-being on the decline, latest Institute The Magazine of the Opportunity & Inclusive conference takes a look at the economics of higher education. Growth Institute 3 SCHOLAR SPOTLIGHT Federal Reserve Bank Four Institute visiting scholars discuss their research on labor of Minneapolis CONTENTS markets and criminal justice, racially biased taxation, benefits Abigail Wozniak Director, Opportunity & of higher wages, and the process of urban change. Inclusive Growth Institute Amy Phenix 6 CRISIS RESPONSE Senior Vice President Diving into real-time data in the midst of a global pandemic, Jay Weiner researchers bring the Institute’s mission to life. Manager, Communications Paul Wallace 14 SEEING THE MARGINS Manager, Digital & Design Services “We need to think about how everyone is doing.” An interview Douglas Clement with Columbia University economist Sandra Black. Managing Editor Alyssa Augustine 19 A TEACHABLE MOMENT? Senior Public Relations Program Manager An open letter from William Spriggs, Institute advisor and Howard University Tu-Uyen Tran economist, calling for systemic change in the economics profession. Senior Writer Jenni Schoppers 22 RESEARCH DIGESTS Senior Publications Coordinating Editor Summaries of two Institute papers on networks, prosperity, and pandemics. Alexis Akervik Manager, Web & Creative 28 DATA DIVE Nina Leo From food scarcity and emergency expenses to child Creative Director care, COVID-19’s inequitable economic effects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unfinished March for Jobs: Focus of US
    THE UNFINISHED MARCH FOR JOBS Focus of U.S. Fiscal Policy Must Shift Back to Full Employment By William E. Spriggs November 20, 2013 Photo: Library of Congress his paper lays out the historical context for understanding the demand for jobs made by the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. The marchers’ demands inarguably led to economic policies and laws that T improved the lives of millions of Americans, particularly African Americans. But while many civil rights gains in educational attainment and electoral successes have been sustained through the decades, the economic gains were comparatively short-lived. Today, the economy struggles to reach the levels of black male median income, black child poverty, and black unemployment that were reached less than a decade after the march, in 1969. As this paper explains, American economic policy from the Employment Act of 1946 to the Volcker “revolution” of October 1979 shifted from prioritizing maximum employment to prioritizing low rates of inflation and high rates of profit. A major result, for example, is that current economic policy planning documents like those from the Congres- sional Budget Office assume full employment is 6 percent, while President Kennedy’s Council of Economic Advisers’ stated policy was to get unemployment below 5 percent. The paper calls for the creation of automatic fiscal policies to resuscitate the fiscal policy mandates proposed by the Full Employment Act of 1945. A new “Social Trust Fund” financed by a financial transactions tax would provide financing for these programs as well as others that could ensure society against the high costs of asset depreciation and financial speculation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Trade on Black Workers
    The Impact of Trade on Black Workers By: Grace Western, Daniella Zessoules, Nyanya Browne, Bethel Cole-Smith, & William Spriggs, PhD June 2021 Photo credit: Remy Gieling, Unsplash INTRODUCTION Over the last several decades, U.S. trade policies—captured by wealthy, corporate interests—have failed working people in the U.S.1 Trade policies undermined the U.S. response to the COVID-19 crisis, consistently failed to address climate change, and resulted in the outsourcing of millions of middle-class jobs to low-wage countries. It is clear that a new direction for trade policy is desperately needed.2 We need policies that center working people instead of corporate profit. A firm understanding of the persistence of systemic racial economic inequities is critical to understanding the full scope of the consequences of failed trade policy in the U.S. Until recently, academics and policymakers have footnoted discussions about the intersection of systemic racial inequalities and trade policies.3 While trade policy failures have directly harmed many workers across the country, wealth and income gaps, discrimination, and occupational segregation have all intensified the effects of dislocations for people of color—and in particular, Black workers. This should come as no surprise. Domestic policy decisions have maintained and normalized economic gaps that ensure Black people face harsher consequences as a result of our deeply flawed economic system, especially when the country is facing a myriad of intersecting crises as we are today. Existing research looking at the distributional impacts of trade find negative effects on local labor markets, particularly in areas with robust manufacturing sectors where imports surged the most.4 However, these studies seldom disaggregate data by race, leaving incomplete answers to the question of how trade has impacted workers of color.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disparate Labor Market Impacts of Monetary Policy
    Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University Of Michigan National Poverty Center Working Paper Series #03-10 Third revision, May 2004 The Disparate Labor Market Impacts of Monetary Policy Seth B. Carpenter, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System William M. Rodgers III , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development National Poverty Center This paper is available online at the National Poverty Center Working Paper Series index at: http://www.npc.umich.edu/publications/working_papers/ Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Poverty Center or any sponsoring agency. The Disparate Labor Market Impacts of Monetary Policy Seth B. Carpenter and William M. Rodgers III1 December 2002 1st Revision July 2003 Second Revision December 2003 Third Revision May 2004 1Carpenter: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Rodgers: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, and the National Poverty Center. Philip Jefferson , Barbara Morgan, Keith Phillips, Maya Rockeymore, William Spriggs, Charles Weise, and two anonymous referees gave useful comments and suggestions. I also thank Gregory Licausi for outstanding research assistance. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve System, the Board of Governors, or other members of the staff. Abstract Employing two widely used approaches to identify the impacts of monetary policy, this paper explores the differential impact of policy on the labor market outcomes of teenagers, minorities, out-of- school youth, and less-skilled individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, May 27, 2020 12:00 to 1:00 Eastern Time
    Please join us Wednesday, May 27, 2020 12:00 to 1:00 Eastern Time The Disproportionate Impact of Covid-19 on African American Workers William Spriggs Chief Economist, AFL-CIO and Professor of Economics, Howard University DC LERA with support from the ILO Office for the United States cordially invites you to join our guest speakers on a webinar which will address the disproportionate burden of illness and death during the Covid-19 pandemic among racial and ethnic minority groups. Our speaker will discuss these developments and how economic, social and occupational conditions contribute to these disparities, especially among essential workers. –The Officers and Board of Governors of DC LERA William Spriggs is a professor in the Department of Economics at Howard University and serves as chief economist to the AFL-CIO. At the AFL-CIO, he chairs the Economic Policy Working Group for the Trade Union Advisory Committee and serves on the board of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Spriggs served as assistant secretary for the Office of Policy at the Department of Labor, having been appointed by President Barack Obama. He also served as chairman of the Health Care Trust for UAW Retirees of the Ford Motor Co. He has held roles leading economic policy development at the Economic Policy Institute and the National Urban League. He is a former president of the National Economics Association, the organization of America’s professional black economists. He graduated from Williams College in Massachusetts and holds a doctorate in economics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. ister REGISTER Registration is required to join this event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minority Report
    THE MINORITY REPORT The annual news of the AEA’s Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economics Profession, the National Economic Association, and the American Society of Hispanic Economists Issue 6, Winter 2014 Recent Trends in Wealth of Minority Groups in the United States: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances By Jeffrey Thompson, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and Gustavo Suarez, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System1 Income is the most frequently used measure for Federal Reserve System every third year starting in 1989, provides valuable information to understand recent trends achieving economic equality. Income is commonly used toevaluating calculate household poverty indicators, well-being is andthe foundationprogress toward of United States.2 The SCF is unique because it offers detailed most household consumption, and is the primary basis informationin the evolution on of household finances and wealth in the household assets and debts and representingfor eligibility resourcesfor social programs. that can be However, used, for wealth example, is to also because it is startalso an a business, important provide measure income of household during retirement, well-being, or representative of serve as a bequest for offspring, all of which are highly Thehouseholds SCF provides with measurerelated with of the opportunities economic progress for economic made advancement.by minority reliablehigh net information worth. Researchers are increasingly looking at wealth as a both on attributes that are broadly distributed in the groups (Pew, 2011; Shapiro, Meschede, and Osoro, 2013; are concentrated in a relatively small segment of the and Masterson, Zacharias, and Wolff, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • National Black Peoples Unity Convention
    NATIONAL BLACK PEOPLES UNITY CONVENTION March 9-12, 2006 Gary, Indiana Program Schedule THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 2006 2:00 p.m. Opening Presiding Officer -- Dr. Dorothy Height, President Emeritus National Council of Negro Women National Anthem Black National Anthem Invocation Welcome -- Richard Hatcher, Co-Chair George Brown, Co-Chair William Lucy, Co-Chair Introduction of Advisory Committee Introduction of Founding Executive Committee Introduction of Local Committee Introduction of Local Dignitaries Remarks – The Honorable Julia Carson (invited) U.S. House of Representatives - Indiana Statement of Purpose – Dr. Ron Walters, University of Maryland Introduction of Keynote Speaker -- Senator Emil Jones, Jr. President, Illinois State Senate Keynote Speaker (TBA) Forum on Economics & the Crisis of Education: Chair & Moderator: Dr. Julianne Malveaux (invited) Participants: Dr. Maya Rockeymoore Dr. William Spriggs, Howard University) Dr. Bernard Anderson, Wharton School of Business Address – Rev. Jesse Jackson, President, Rainbow/PUSH (invited) Question & Answer Period Forum on the Next Generation: Chair & Moderator: Dr. Joe Leonard, Black Leadership Forum Participants: John Bryant, Chairman & CEO (invited) Operation HOPE Gary Flowers, Rainbow/PUSH (invited) Rosalyn Brock, Vice Chair, NAACP (invited) Melanie Campbell, Executive Director & CEO National Coalition on Black Civic Participation Lakimba Walker, Executive Director (invited) National Black Caucus of State Legislators Paul Brathwaite, Policy Director (invited) Congressional Black Caucus Latosha
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Inequality and Minimum Wages in Frictional Labor Markets
    IRLE WORKING PAPER #101-21 January 2021 Racial Inequality and Minimum Wages in Frictional Labor Markets Jesse Wursten and Michael Reich Cite as: Jesse Wursten and Michael Reich. (2021). “Racial Inequality and Minimum Wages in Frictional Labor Markets”. IRLE Working Paper No. 101-21. http://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2021/01/Racial-Inequality-and-Minimum-Wages.pdf http://irle.berkeley.edu/working-papers January 25, 2021 Racial Inequality and Minimum Wages in Frictional Labor Markets Jesse Wursten* and Michael Reich** We examine how the racial patchwork of federal and state minimum wage changes between 1990 and 2019 has affected racial wage gaps, with specific attention to effects on labor market frictions. Black workers on average are less likely to live in high-wage states that have raised their wage floors. The effect of state minimum wages on the national racial wage gap is thus not self-evident. Using five different causal specifications, including the “bunching” estimator of Cengiz et al. (2019), and data from the CPS and the QWI, we find that minimum wage changes since 1990 did reduce the 2019 racial wage gaps, by 12 percent among all workers and 60 percent among less-educated workers. The reductions are greater among black women and among black prime age workers. The gains for black workers are concentrated well above the new minimum wage, beyond the usual spillover estimates. Earnings of all race/ethnic/gender groups grew, with larger effects among black workers. We do not find disemployment effects for any group. Surprisingly, racial differences in initial wages do not explain the reduction in the racial wage gap.
    [Show full text]
  • OMARI H. SWINTON
    Omari H. Swinton Associate Professor, Department of Economics Academic Support Building “B”, Room 319 Washington, DC 20059 Office: (202) 806-6774 Cell: (850) 284-5911 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION 1998-2001 Bachelor of Science, Florida A & M University, Tallahassee, FL USA 2001-2003 Master of Arts in Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC USA 2001-2007 PhD in Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC USA AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Primary Fields: Labor Economics and Economics of Education Secondary Fields: Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics DISSERTATION Title: Noncognitive Ability and College Performance Committee: Marjorie McElroy (Chair), Peter Arcidiacono, Pietro F. Peretto, Alessandro Tarozzi, and Jacob Vigdor ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 2020 to present Professor, Department of Economics, Howard University, Washington, DC USA 2017 to present Chair, Department of Economics, Howard University, Washington, DC USA 2016 to 2017 Associate Chair, Department of Economics, Howard University, Washington, DC USA 2016 to present Director of Graduate Studies Department of Economics, Howard University, Washington, DC USA 2013 to 2020 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Howard University, Washington, DC USA 2007-2013 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Howard University, Washington, DC USA Intermediate Microeconomics (Econ 170) Intermediate Macroeconomics (Econ 171) Principles of Economics II (Econ 002) Introduction to Urban Economics-WRTG (Econ 799) Microeconomic Theory I (Formerly (Price Theory I) (Ecog 200) Freshman Seminar (Frsm 001) Economic Development in Africa (Ecog 224) & (Econ186) Workshop in Economic Research (Ecog 207) Microeconomic Theory II (Ecog 201) Junior Departmental Honors (Econ 088) Political Economy (Econ 132) 1 ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE CONTINUED Summer 2010 & Summer 2011 UNCF Special Programs Sophomore Summer Policy Institute, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA .
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of the Joint Session on Measuring the Economic Effects of Systemic Racism and Discrimination
    American Economic Association Committee on Economic Statistics and National Economic Association Joint Session on Measuring the Economic Effects of Systemic Racism and Discrimination: A Summary February 2021 “A universal way of measuring structural racism does not exist. We urgently need valid, replicable and theoretically sound measures of structural racism to expose evidence of its harm… and to identify pathways for intervention.” Rachel Hardeman, with reference to Groos, Wallace, Hardeman, and Theall (2018) "Measuring inequity: a systematic review of methods used to quantify structural racism," Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice: (11) 2. A working definition of systemic racism submits it as a concept that refers to patterns of behavior, policies or practices that are part of the structures of organizations or cultures and creates or perpetuates disadvantages for people of color. A robust body of research establishes that race is a factor associated with unequal outcomes in employment, housing, education, finance, health, and criminal justice, among other areas. The conceptualization of systemic racism postulates that race is a factor associated with unequal outcomes because race enables those with the power to cause unequal outcomes to do so based on the race of others, as opposed to race being a direct causal factor in unequal outcomes. Race is a distal rather than a proximate factor in the unequal outcomes. Further analysis of causes, consequences and policy options will likely require changes in data collection and measurement to provide improved or new statistical measures that can be used to track racially affected outcomes over space and time. The American Economic Association Committee on Economic Statistics (AEAStat) and the National Economic Association (NEA) organized a special working session to address these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Now a Teachable Moment for Economists? an Open Letter to Economists from Bill Spriggs
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Is now a teachable moment for economists? An open letter to economists from Bill Spriggs The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Dear colleagues, I have been warmed by the opening of the hearts of some economists who have displayed a new, and renewed, sense of angst about the racial issues our nation confronts because recent events have moved them. Watching the gut-wrenching brutal murder of George Floyd has gotten them to think about the bigger issue of what is really wrong, because their training as economists has let them silently accept lots of “givens” they now understand should not be presumed, and that “givens” do, in fact, matter. Having come to the realization that one cannot simply assume that all police are there to serve and protect is wrong. Watching the other three police officers sit by and do nothing about the murder means you have to question other assumptions too. But I am not sure if this moment has gotten to economists enough to see their role as economists in perpetuating the very things they wish to recoil from. Modern economics has a deep and painful set of roots that too few economists acknowledge. The founding leadership of the American Economic Association deeply and fervently provided “scientific” succor to the American eugenicists’ movement. Their concept of race and human interaction was based on the “racial” superiority of White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants. And they launched modern economics with a definition of race that fully incorporated the assumed superiority of that group and bought into a notion of race as an exogenous variable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disparate Labor Market Impacts of Monetary Policy
    Gerald R. Ford School Of Public Policy, University Of Michigan National Poverty Center Working Paper Series #03-10 Second Revision December 2003 The Disparate Labor Market Impacts of Monetary Policy William M. Rodgers III Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey And John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development And National Poverty Center This paper is available online at the National Poverty Center Working Paper Series index at: http://www.npc.umich.edu/publications/working_papers/ Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Poverty Center or any sponsoring agency. The Disparate Labor Market Impacts of Monetary Policy William M. Rodgers III Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey And John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development And National Poverty Center December 2002 1st Revision July 2003 Second Revision December 2003 Rodgers is the Chief Economist of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development and a Senior Research Associate for the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan. An earlier draft of this paper was completed when Rodgers was the Frances L. and Edwin L. Cummings Associate Professor of Economics and Director of the Center for the Study of Equality at the College of William and Mary. Versions of this paper were presented at the 73rd Annual Conference of the Southern Economic Association in San Antonio, TX, November 23, 2003, the 68th Annual Research Conference of the Western Economic Association International in Denver, CO, July 2003 and the 24th Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management in Dallas, TX, November 9, 2002.
    [Show full text]