Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive Summary Humboldt Regional Transportation Plan – 2013/14 Update Draft EIR Section 4.2 Biological Resources 4.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.2.1 Setting a. Habitats. Humboldt County is part of the Klamath/North coast bioregion. In general, this bioregion is characterized by its rocky coastline, forested montane areas, and relatively sparse human settlement. Much of this mountainous bioregion is covered by forest. It is considered one of the wettest areas in the State of California. Humboldt’s coastal area is characterized as having a cool and moist climate with a tendency for fog, while inland the climate is drier. The bays, estuaries, and other tidal inlets of the Humboldt coastal area provide a variety of habitats for resident and migratory wildlife species. Humboldt Bay, one of California’s largest coastal estuaries, is home to diverse and resource-rich habitats that support invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals. The Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, established in 1971 within the Humboldt Bay area, provides almost 4,000 acres of conserved habitats, including mudflats, estuarine eelgrass meadows, saltmarsh, brackish marsh, seasonally flooded freshwater wetlands, riparian wetlands, streams, coastal dunes, and forest. These habitats support over 316 species of birds and 40 species of mammals. The refuge also provides habitat for approximately 100 species of fish and marine invertebrates, including steelhead, coho, chinook salmon, and Dungeness crab (USFWS, 2014; Humboldt County General Plan Update Draft EIR, 2012). The inland areas of Humboldt County are composed mainly of coastline and mountainous areas with dense coniferous forests interspersed with grass or chaparral covered slopes. Six wild rivers run through the County, providing habitats for fish and wildlife as well as important water resources. Over 400,000 acres of the County’s undeveloped forest and coastline habitats are designated as parkland in the State and National Park systems, leaving large tracts of undisturbed habitat (Humboldt County General Plan Update Draft EIR, 2012). Twenty-eight terrestrial habitat types are mapped using the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW; formerly referred to as the California Department of fish and Game) California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) habitat classification system within Humboldt County (CDFW, 2008) (Figure 4.2-1). Because of the scale of this programmatic EIR, the habitat categories presented in Figure 4.2-1 depict a broad illustration of the CWHR types found within Humboldt County. Below, we describe each of the habitats adapted from A Guide to Wildlife Habitats of California (Mayer and Laudenslayer, 1988). It should be noted that these habitats are generalized and that site-specific variation is likely present. Also note that the CWHR classification system maps habitats from a broad perspective and that in many areas it is expected that two or more habitats may blend with one another. Habitats which occur within populated areas can also show variation because of a greater exposure to anthropogenic influences, such as the introduction of exotic plant species. Tree Dominated Habitats. Tree dominated habitats are the predominant vegetation type in Humboldt County. Fir forest and redwood represent over 50 percent of the county (Figure 4.2-1). Redwood areas generally occur from the coast eastward to the ridgeline. Fir and montane hardwood occur in the eastern and southeastern areas of the county. Fir and hardwood forests HCAOG 4.2-1 Section 4.2 Biological Resources CHWR Classifications ST ± ST ST ST P a c i f i c O c e a n ST ST ST ¤£ ST Data background elements provided by ESRI and its licensors © 2014. US Department of Agriculture, 2014. California Wildlife Relationship Classifications Figure 4.2-1 HCAOG Humboldt Regional Transportation Plan – 2013/14 Update Draft EIR Section 4.2 Biological Resources support sensitive species such as goshawk, red tree vole, and spotted owls. Old growth redwood and Douglas fir forests provide prime breeding grounds for numerous sensitive species. Most of the old growth forestland is protected by State and federal park designation (e.g., Redwoods State Park, Headwaters, and Redwood National Park). However, there are a few pockets of unprotected old growth forestlands near the Headwaters land and adjacent to other protected areas. Hardwood and conifer forests are not considered as sensitive as fir and redwood forests, in terms of habitat quality (Humboldt County General Plan Update, Natural Resources and Hazards, Biological Resources, 2002). The following describes types of tree-dominated habitats that occur within Humboldt County. Riparian areas are critical to many species of wildlife. The vegetation provides cover and nesting habitat for birds and creates corridors for animal movement including travel to and from different habitat types. These areas are important for wildlife migration and dispersal. While riparian habitat occurs as linear strips through various vegetation types, the adjacent upland habitat is often different. The edges where riparian habitat meets with upland habitat are known as ecotones, or edge habitats, which are important for many wildlife species (Humboldt County General Plan Update, Natural Resources and Hazards, Biological Resources, 2002). Douglas Fir Forest. This habitat typically exhibits a spatial variation due to geologic, topographic, and successional variation typical within its range. Structure within this habitat types typically consists of a lower overstory of dense, sclerophyllous, broad-leaved evergreen trees such as tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus) and Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), with an irregular, often open, higher overstory of tall needle-leaved evergreen trees such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Klamath Mixed Conifer. This habitat type is typically composed of tall, dense to moderately open, needle-leaved evergreen forests with patches of broad-leaved evergreen and deciduous low trees and shrubs. The overstory layer is characterized by a mixture of conifers. Dominant conifers in the western range of this habitat are typically white fir (Abies concolor) and Douglas fir. In the east, dominant conifers consist of white fir, Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Coastal Oak Woodland. Coastal oak woodlands are common to mesic coastal foothills of California. The woodlands do not form a continuous belt, but occur in a mosaic closely associated with mixed chaparral, coastal scrub and annual grasslands. These woodlands are commonly dominated by coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia). At drier sites other species such as blue oak and foothill pine (Pinus sabiniana) may also be interspersed. The understory of dense stands tends to be composed of shade tolerant shrubs and herbaceous plant species such as California blackberry (Rubus ursinus), miner’s lettuce (Claytonia perfoliata) and toyon. In areas with more open canopies the understory may be more dominated by grassland and shrub species such as California blackberry (Rubus ursinus), and poison oak. Closed-Cone Pine-Cypress Forest. This habitat type is typically dominated by a single species of closed-cone pines (Pinus sp.) or cypress (Cupressus sp.) and the height and canopy closure of these series are variable depending upon site characteristics including soil type, the age of the stand and the floristic composition. Closed-cone pine-cypress forests are considered fire climax or fire-dependent vegetation types. This habitat type is typically found within rocky HCAOG 4.2-3 Humboldt Regional Transportation Plan – 2013/14 Update Draft EIR Section 4.2 Biological Resources and infertile soils along the extreme coast or on very shallow infertile soils contain stunted, wind-pruned individuals. Montane hardwood-conifer. This habitat type includes both conifers and hardwoods often as a closed forest. Composition is comprised of at least one-third conifers and at least one-third broad-leaved tree species. The habitat often occurs in a mosaic-like pattern with small pure stands of conifers interspersed with small stands of broad-leaved trees. This diverse habitat consists of a broad spectrum of mixed, vigorously growing conifer and hardwood species. Most of the broad-leaved trees are sclerophyllous evergreen, but winter-deciduous species also occur. Relatively little understory occurs under canopy. Steeper slopes are normally devoid of litter; however, gentle slopes often contain considerable accumulations of leaf and branch litter. Redwood. Second growth redwood habitats are characterized by an even-aged structure with an open park like appearance. Coast redwood (Sequioa sempervirens) is the dominant tree species. Understory vegetation in old-growth redwood is usually very dense and composed of tall shrubs. Redwoods are very vigorous sprouters; sprouts eventually form the dominant canopy. Redwood and associated conifers also reproduce well by seed. Montane Hardwood. A typical montane hardwood habitat is composed of a pronounced hardwood tree layer, with an infrequent and poorly developed shrub stratum, and a sparse herbaceous layer. In the Coast Ranges, canyon live oak (Quercus chrysolepis) often forms pure stands on steep canyon slopes and rocky ridge tops. It is replaced at higher elevations by scattered huckleberry oak (Quercus vacciniifolia) amongst an overstory of various conifers including ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), Coulter pine (Pinus
Recommended publications
  • RESTORATION ACTION PLAN MARINA DUNES PRESERVE Marina, California
    RESTORATION ACTION PLAN MARINA DUNES PRESERVE Marina, California Prepared for: Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District 4860 Carmel Valley Road Carmel, CA 93923 Prepared by: Burleson Consulting Inc. 1900 Garden Road, Suite 210 Monterey, CA 93940 March 2021 This page intentionally left blank Restoration Action Plan, Marina Dunes Preserve CONTENTS CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................................................i APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2. UPDATED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Weed Eradication and Control .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Regeneration of White and Red Fir. . . Influence of Several Factors. Berkeley, Calif., Pacific SW
    PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range FOREST SERVICE. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE P.O. BOX 245, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94701 Experiment Station U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER PSW- 58 /1970 Gordon, Donald T. 1970. Natural regeneration of white and red fir. influence of several factors. Berkeley, Calif., Pacific SW. Forest & Range Exp. Sta. 32 p., illus. (U.S.D.A. Forest Serv. Res. Pap. PSW-58) In a group of studies at Swain Mountain Experimental Forest in northeastern California, seedling survival and mortality were analyzed within the general framework of seed production and dispersal, germination, seedbed condition, soil surface temperature, insolation, soil moisture, and vegetative competition. Factors found to favor seedling establishment were abundance of sound seed, mineral soil seedbed, and probably some shade in the first year. Chief obstacles to seedling survival and growth included strong insolation, deep litter, insects, competing low vegetation, and time between good seed years. The most practical approach to securing natural regeneration appears to be keeping abundant seed trees close to a prepared mineral soil seedbed. Oxford: 231–181.525[+ 174.7 Abies concolor + 174.7 Abies magnifica + 174.7 Abies magnifica var. shastensis]. Retrieval Terms: Abies concolor; Abies magnifica; Abies magnifica var. shastensis; natural regeneration; seedling establishment; seedbed; protective shading; seed production; seedling mortality; Swain Mountain Experimental Forest. Gordon, Donald T. 1970. Natural regeneration of white and red fir. influence of several factors. Berkeley, Calif., Pacific SW. Forest & Range Exp. Sta. 32 p., illus. (U.S.D.A. Forest Serv. Res. Pap. PSW-58) In a group of studies at Swain Mountain Experimental Forest in northeastern California, seedling survival and mortality were analyzed within the general framework of seed production and dispersal, germination, seedbed condition, soil surface temperature, insolation, soil moisture, and vegetative competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Efforts to Restore the Mattole River and Its Watershed Chad Buran
    Efforts to restore the Mattole River and its watershed Chad Buran Introduction Up and down the Pacific Coast of the Northwest United States, the salmon and steelhead populations have been severely impacted by the increased timber harvesting and road construction along the streams that the fish depend on for spawning. The Mattole River is one example of how these activities have descimated the fishery. The efforts to restore the Mattole watershed is one of the first citizen-initiated watershed restoration projects in North America. For more than twenty years, the inhabitants of the watershed have worked to improve the ecological health of streams, fisheries, forests, and soils of the watershed. The Mattole Salmon Group (MSG) was formed by citizens of the watershed in the 1970s in response to the decline in the Mattole salmon fishery. The initial restoration efforts began in 1980, to provide substitute spawning habitat. In the mid-1980s, the Mattole Restoration Council (MRC) was founded to link the various restoration efforts already underway and to coordinate those efforts in the context of the whole basin. These groups have used a variety of restoration techniques to improve the spawning habitat and the health of the Mattole River. The objective of this paper is to describe the restoration approaches that these two Mattole River groups have used and to review the success of these techniques in this location. I will also describe how techniques have been used in different contexts in the watershed and how they have worked in under various conditions of river flow in these locations. Geographic Setting and Historical Context The Mattole River drains a 304-square-mile (787-square-kilometer) watershed in the Coast Ranges of northwestern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Maturity in White Fir and Red Fir. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp
    PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range FOREST SERVICE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE P.O. BOX 245, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94701 Experiment Station USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER PSW-99 /1974 CONTENTS Page Summary ................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................. 3 Methods .................................................... 3 Testing Fresh Seeds ....................................... 3 Testing Stratified Seeds .................................... 3 Seedling Vigor Tests ...................................... 4 Artificial Ripening Trial ................................... 4 Other Observations ........................................ 4 Results and Discussion ....................................... 5 Cone Specific Gravity ..................................... 5 Seed Germination, byCollection Date ....................... 5 Seed GerminationandCone Specific Gravity ................ 7 Red Fir Seedling Vigor .................................... 9 ArtificialRipening of White Fir Seeds ....................... 9 OtherMaturity Indices ..................................... 9 Application ................................................. 10 Literature Cited.............................................. 12 THE AUTHOR WILLIAM W. OLIVER is doing silvicultural research on Sierra Nevada conifer types with headquarters at Redding, California. He earned a B.S. degree (1956) in forestry from the University of New Hampshire, and an M.F. degree (1960) from the University of Michigan. A native of
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Dunes
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE DEL MONTE FOREST COASTAL DUNES DEL MONTE FOREST PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared for: Pebble Beach Company Post Office Box 1767 Pebble Beach, California 93953-1767 Contact: Mark Stilwell (831) 625-8497 Prepared by: Zander Associates 150 Ford Way, Suite 101 Novato, California 94945 Contact: Michael Zander July 2001 Zander Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Plates 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Dunes within the DMF Planning Area...................................................2 2.1 Remnant Dunes .......................................................................................................2 2.2 Rehabilitation Area..................................................................................................4 2.3 ESHA Boundary......................................................................................................6 3.0 Relationship to the DMF Plan .....................................................................................8 3.1 Preserve Areas (Area L and Signal Hill Dune) .......................................................8 3.2 Development Areas (New Golf Course and Facilities—Areas M & N).................8 3.2.1 General Design Considerations .......................................................................8 3.2.2 Golf Course Specific Design...........................................................................9 3.2.3 Golf
    [Show full text]
  • King Range National Conservation Area Case Study
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 King Range National Conservation Area Case Study Ann Morgan Doug Cannon University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Ann Morgan & Doug Cannon, King Range National Conservation Area Case Study (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Ann Morgan & Doug Cannon, KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA CASE STUDY (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA CASE STUDY Ann Morgan and Doug Cannon Natural Resources Law Center January 9, 2004 Table of Contents BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 1 PUBLIC LAW 91-476....................................................................................................................... 2 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Valley Oak and Prairie Cooperative Strategic Action Plan
    Willamette Valley Oak and Prairie Cooperative Strategic Action Plan March 2020 Willamette Valley Oak and Prairie Cooperative Strategic Action Plan, March 2020 Page i Acknowledgements Steering Committee: Clinton Begley Long Tom Watershed Council Sara Evans-Peters Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture Claire Fiegener Greenbelt Land Trust Tom Kaye Institute for Applied Ecology Nicole Maness Willamette Partnership Shelly Miller City of Eugene Will Neuhauser Yamhill Partners for Land and Water Michael Pope Greenbelt Land Trust Lawrence Schwabe Confederated Tribes Grand Ronde Bruce Taylor Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture Stan van de Wetering Confederated Tribes Siletz Kelly Warren Ducks Unlimited INC Contractors: Jeff Krueger JK Environments Carolyn Menke Institute for Applied Ecology Working Group: Bob Altman American Bird Conservancy Ed Alverson Lane County Parks Marc Bell Polk Soil and Water Conservation District Andrea Berkley Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Matt Blakeley-Smith Greenbelt Land Trust Jason Blazar Friends of Buford Park & Mt. Pisgah Lynda Boyer Heritage Seedlings Joe Buttafuoco The Nature Conservancy Mikki Collins U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Sarah Deumling Zena Forest Daniel Dietz McKenzie River Trust Sarah Dyrdhal Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council Matt Gibbons The Nature Conservancy Lauren Grand Oregon State University Extension Service Jarod Jebousek U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Bart Johnson University of Oregon Pat Johnston U.S Bureau of Land Management Molly Juillerat U.S. National Forest Service (MFWRD) Cameron King U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service John Klock U.S Bureau of Land Management Ann Kreager Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Amie Loop-Frison Yamhill Soil and Water Conservation District Katie MacKendrick Long Tom Watershed Council Anne Mary Meyers Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Willamette Valley Oak and Prairie Cooperative Strategic Action Plan, March 2020 Page ii Mark Miller Trout Mountain Forestry Kevin O'Hara U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Biodiversity Management Plan Pdf
    April 2015 VEGETATION AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Marin County Parks Marin County Open Space District VEGETATION AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Prepared for: Marin County Parks Marin County Open Space District 3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 260 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 473-6387 [email protected] www.marincountyparks.org Prepared by: May & Associates, Inc. Edited by: Gail Slemmer Alternative formats are available upon request TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents GLOSSARY 1. PROJECT INITIATION ...........................................................................................................1-1 The Need for a Plan..................................................................................................................1-1 Overview of the Marin County Open Space District ..............................................................1-1 The Fundamental Challenge Facing Preserve Managers Today ..........................................1-3 Purposes of the Vegetation and Biodiversity Management Plan .....................................1-5 Existing Guidance ....................................................................................................................1-5 Mission and Operation of the Marin County Open Space District .........................................1-5 Governing and Guidance Documents ...................................................................................1-6 Goals for the Vegetation and Biodiversity Management Program ..................................1-8 Summary of the Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Report City of Fort Bragg Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT CITY OF FORT BRAGG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE 101 West Cypress Street (APN 008-020-07) Fort Bragg Mendocino County, California prepared by: William Maslach [email protected] August 2016 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT CITY OF FORT BRAGG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE 101 WEST CYPRESS STREET (APN 008-020-07) FORT BRAGG MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: Scott Perkins Associate Planner City of Fort Bragg 416 North Franklin Street Fort Bragg, California PREPARED BY: William Maslach 32915 Nameless Lane Fort Bragg, California (707) 732-3287 [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Location & Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Site Directions ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Species Occurrences
    S U G A R L O A F M OUNTAIN T RAIL Biological Resources Report Prepared for: Bear-Yuba Land Trust (BYLT) ATTN: Bill Haire 12183 South Auburn Road Grass Valley, CA 95949 Ph: (530) 272-5994 and City of Nevada City ATTN: Amy Wolfson 317 Broad Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Ph: (530) 265-2496 Prepared by: Chainey-Davis Biological Consulting ATTN: Carolyn Chainey-Davis 182 Grove Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Ph: (530) 205-6218 August 2018 Sugarloaf Mountain Trail — Biological Inventory C h a i n e y - Davis Biological Consulting SUMMARY This Biological Resources Report (BRR) includes an inventory and analysis of potential impacts to biological resources resulting from the construction and operation of the Sugarloaf Mountain Trail, a proposed 1.5-mile public recreational trail in Nevada City, California, on a 30-acre open space preserve owned by the City of Nevada City (APN 036-020-026). The trail would be constructed, managed, and maintained by the Bear-Yuba Land Trust, a private non-profit organization. The project would expand an existing small, primitive trail and construct a new segment of trail on Sugarloaf Mountain, just north of Nevada City. The trail begins near the intersection of State Route 49 and North Bloomfield Road and terminates on Sugarloaf Mountain. The proposed trail includes a quarter-mile segment on an easement through private land. The project drawings are provided in Appendix A. Trail tread width will vary from 36 to 48 inches, depending on location and physical constraints, and constructed using a mini excavator, chainsaws, and a variety of hand tools.
    [Show full text]