DOCSLIB.ORG

Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 September 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 September 2016 Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 September 2016 Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 Ms. Cherie Reiche International Automotive Oversight Bureau IATF Scheme Management Structure 3 Percent Regional Certificate Distribution Valid Certificates per Region [%] 66.6% Asia Pacific Africa0.8% 2.4% South America 9.7% North America 2.6% 17.9% Middle East Europe Africa Asia Europe Middle North South Pacific East America America 4 Distribution of 66,033 certificates (31 August 2016) Note: only countries with greater than 500 certificates are listed on this slide 5 Oversight CBs & Certificates 31st August 2016 Oversight No. CBs Certificate Percentage Count (%) ANFIA 2 1776 ~2.7 (Italy) IAOB 20 21,494 32.5 (USA) IATF France 3 2022 ~3.0 (France) SMMT 6 13,101 19.8 (England) VDA QMC 13 27,639 ~42.0 (Germany) Total 44 66,033 100 6 Disciplined development method for IATF 16949 • Revision work began in December 2014 and was completed in August 2016 • The team completed a 5-Phase approach to revising ISO/TS 16949 into IATF 16949 – Pre-plan; Analyze; Build; Validate; and Deploy • Revision Work Team consisted of 17 global partners from 14 organizations (IATF OEMs, IATF Global Oversight Offices, and others) AIAG IAOB ANFIA IATF France BMW Jaguar Land Rover FCA US LLC (formerly Chrysler) PSA Group FCA Italy S.p.A. (formerly Fiat) SMMT Ford VDA QMC GM VW 7 Changes from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 New automotive standard: IATF 16949:2016 • IATF 16949:2016 follows the high level structure of ISO 9001:2015 • IATF 16949:2016 must be used in conjunction with ISO 9001:2015 2 separate documents must be used to have all requirements IATF 16949 cannot be used as a stand-alone requirements document • 282 shalls / 16 shoulds in IATF 16949 (292 shalls / 16 shoulds in ISO/TS 16949) • IATF created a transition plan and communicated April 2016 (further revised in August 2016), which will be discussed in more detail later. 8 Unprecedented input from key stakeholders • IATF launched a survey (via the National Associations) early June 2015 soliciting feedback from over 2,000 key stakeholders: – OEMs – Suppliers (all Tiers) – Certification Bodies – Witness Auditors – Subject Matter Experts – Oversight Offices • Over 1,700 comments were received for consideration of updates to ISO/TS 16949. • Additionally, the IATF conducted a face:face review of the draft IATF 16949 standard in Rome, Italy in April 2016 with CBs and supplier representatives. 9 Survey respondents 2% 1% 8% 9% Suppliers Certification Bodies OEM Witness Auditors 17% Oversight Offices Subject Matter Experts 63% PAGE 10 10 Value & Credibility • IATF OEMs and Global Oversight members look at the linkage between ISO/TS 16949 Certification and Supplier/Client quality performance – Increased focus on operational performance and customer feedback (customer scorecards/metrics) – IATF 16949 contains many IATF OEM Customer Specific Requirements (CSRs) – OEMs are raising the bar regarding expectations for audits to reflect systemic weaknesses that affect supplier/client performance • Goal = Prevent problems before they occur 11 Communication Process The IATF felt it was important to keep everyone informed about project updates, so they posted regular updates to the IATF Global Oversight website: http://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/content.aspx?page=IATF%20ISO/TS%20 16949%20Revision%20Workgroup%20News 12 Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 Mr. Russ Hopkins Ford Motor Company IATF 16949 Project Lead Legend of changes 14 Changes Section 4.3.1: Determining the scope of the quality management system – supplemental • These requirements were originally included in ISO/TS 16949:2009 Sections 1.1 and 1.2. They have been moved to Section 4 within IATF 16949. • The requirement relating to supporting functions was revised to ensure that supporting functions not only address the need to include support functions in the audit, but also to ensure that they are included in the scope of the QMS. • In addition, any exclusion sought for design and development activities, now in Section 8.3, has to be preserved as documented information. 15 Changes Section 4.3.2: Customer-specific requirements • Although the need to fulfill and satisfy customer-specific requirements was already mentioned throughout the whole ISO/TS 16949 document, in IATF 16949 this requirement specifically addresses the need to evaluate the customer specific requirements and include them where applicable in the organization's quality management system. • This means that the supplier would need some sort of process to evaluate each of their customer’s customer-specific requirements and determine exactly how (and where) it applies to their organization's QMS, as applicable. 16 Changes Section 4.4.1.1: Conformance of products and processes • This requirement was adopted based on IATF survey feedback received • It ensures two things: – that the supplier (organization) is responsible for the conformity of outsourced processes, and – that all products and processes meet all applicable requirements and expectations of all interested parties • To ensure conformance of all products and processes, the organization would need to take a proactive approach to assess and address risks, and not rely only on inspection 17 Changes Section 4.4.1.2: Product safety • New section with enhanced requirements that address current and emerging issues the automotive industry is facing related to product and process safety. • Organizations (suppliers) are required to have documented processes to manage product-safety related products and processes. 18 Changes Section 4.4.1.2: Product safety • This section includes identification of statutory requirements; identifying and controlling product-safety-related characteristics both during design and at point of manufacture; defining responsibilities, escalation processes, reaction plans, and the necessary flow of information including top management and customers; receiving special approvals for FMEAs and Control Plans; product traceability measures; and cascading of requirements throughout the supply chain. 19 Changes Section 5.1.1.1: Corporate responsibility • ISO 9001:2015 expanded the ISO 9001:2009 concept of management responsibility into a set of leadership behaviors to ensure an effective QMS. • IATF 16949 includes the requirement for an anti-bribery policy, an employee code of conduct, and an ethics escalation policy to address increasing market and governmental expectations for improved integrity in social and environmental matters in the automotive industry. • This implies responsibility and empowerment at all levels and functions of the supplier/organization to follow an ethical approach and report any observed unethical behavior without fear of reprisal. 20 Changes Section 5.1.1.2: Process effectiveness and efficiency • The requirement for a supplier/organization to review their processes to ensure effectiveness and efficiency was covered in ISO/TS 16949, Section 5.1.1. • Based on survey feedback, the IATF strengthened the requirement to ensure that the results of process review activities will now be included in management review. • Process review activities need to include evaluation methods and, as a result, implement improvements. • The results of these steps would be an input to the management review process. Top management is thus performing a review of the process-specific reviews performed by the process owners. 21 Changes Section 5.1.1.3: Process owners • ISO/TS 16949:2009 addresses management responsibility and authority, but it does not explicitly mention that management ensure process owners understand their role and are competent. • The IATF adopted this new requirement to ensure that management understands this expectation, by specifically identifying these process owners and ensuring they can perform their assigned roles. • This requirement recognizes that process owners have the authority and responsibility for activities and results for the processes they manage. 22 Changes Section 5.3.1: Organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities – supplemental • This requirement was already part of ISO/TS 16949:2009. However, based on IATF survey feedback, the IATF adopted some modifications to the requirement to address the need to document assigned personnel responsibilities and authorities. • Additionally, this clause now clarifies that the goal is not just to address customer requirements but also to meet customer requirements fully. • Personnel involved in capacity analysis, logistics information, customer scorecards, and customer portals now also need to be assigned and documented, per the requirements in this section. 23 Changes Section 5.3.2: Responsibility and authority for product requirements and corrective actions • Based on survey feedback, the IATF adopted some enhancements to the requirement originally included in ISO/TS 16949 to explicitly make Top Management responsible for ensuring conformity to product requirements and that corrective actions are taken. • IATF 16949 clarifies that there must be a process to inform those with the authority and responsibility for corrective action in order that they ensure non-conforming product is identified, contained, and not shipped to the customer. • This implies that the assigned personnel must be always available to take prompt action to prevent release. 24 Changes Section 6.1.2.1: Risk analysis • The need to identify, analyze, and consider actual and potential risks was covered in various areas of ISO/TS 16949. • The IATF adopted additional requirements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Douglas Autotech ISO 9001:2015 /IATF 16949 Quality Manual I-4.4-C-AD-P-001
    Title: Quality Manual Document No. Date: Page 1 of 69 I-4.4-C-AD-P- ISO 9001:2015 & IATF 16949 5-6-2020 001 Supplement Revision D 7 Douglas Autotech ISO 9001:2015 /IATF 16949 Quality Manual I-4.4-C-AD-P-001 WEB SITE- http://www.douglasautotech.com Revision Date Person Responsible Description of Change B 12-13-2017 Quality Assurance Mgr. Changes of notification to certification body page 6 of 68. C 1-8-2019 Quality Assurance Mgr. Added note (f) to Internal Auditor Comp. to address NSF CAR #2542, added ref. to DACH internal auditor training material to prove competency in the auditor. D 5-6-2020 Quality Assurance Mgr. Updated Org. Chart Title: Quality Manual Document No. Date: Page 2 of 69 I-4.4-C-AD-P- ISO 9001:2015 & IATF 16949 5-6-2020 001 Supplement Revision D Scope, Field of Application and Process Approach 0.1 General Douglas Autotech has adopted the ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Standard as its base quality management system. This documented manual specifies the quality management systems and procedures that we use. The systems requirements of this manual are aimed at achieving customer satisfaction by consistently providing conforming product and meeting customer requirements through application of the system, continual improvement and the prevention of nonconformity. This Quality Manual conforms to the requirements and elements of the five Clauses contained in the base ISO 9001:2015 /IATF 16949 international standard. Douglas Autotech adheres to the policy statements defined for each Clause and sub-clause or element of the aforementioned standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Manual for North America
    DocuSign Envelope ID: F0A28E81-9E0E-41CB-AD1D-AD7F717BDAA9 Quality Manual Electrical Power North America Rev. H 5/15/2019 Re Quality Manual for North America Revision Reason Date A Initial Issue 7/24/11 B Company Re-Organization (+ Eldre Corp) 4/27/12 C Company Re-Organization (Update Vital Stats) 6/7/12 D Company Re-Organization (+El Paso, - Mfg. from Nbpt) 2/28/14 New Quality Policy EURAM E Change of Scope for Kestrel A and B 3/3/15 F Update to ISO 9001-2015 standard 1/17/17 G Quality Manual was updated to apply to Mersen Juarez 3/29/19 H Quality Manual was updated to add IATF doc ref/clarify content and 5/15/19 was added the process map Plant 2, changed the scope for Plant 2 and was added the exclusions for Plant 2 Page 1 of 61 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0A28E81-9E0E-41CB-AD1D-AD7F717BDAA9 Quality Manual Electrical Power North America Rev. H 5/15/2019 Re Signature Block: Created By: Signatures: T. Haskins 05 August 2019 | 15:51:59 EDT 06 August 2019 | 09:20:59 EDT Gustavo Perez Checked By: C. Byron 05 August 2019 | 15:08:42 EDT 05 August 2019 | 15:29:21 EDT Milton Zepeda Approved By: 14 August 2019 | 08:26:13 CEST Th. Lopez de Arias V. Radunsky 08 August 2019 | 09:28:42 EDT Ryan Hill 07 August 2019 | 09:27:29 EDT 07 August 2019 | 19:35:01 CEST Octavio Baro Completed: Date: By: Page 2 of 61 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0A28E81-9E0E-41CB-AD1D-AD7F717BDAA9 Quality Manual Electrical Power North America Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Mestacontrol Red Light and Speed Violation Processing System
    MESTAcontrol Red Light and Speed Violation Processing System Solution description Document Ref: QA (Eshhar) TR Sys/Svc MCC CR. Version 1-00 2019-11-11 Reproduction and Disclosure Prohibited About IDEMIA IDEMIA is the name of the group that combines the two great companies – Oberthur Technologies and Safran Identity & Security – that have joined forces to form the new leader in trusted identities for an increasingly digital world. IDEMIA places the client, consumer or citizen at the heart of everything it does, combining security, convenience, the human factor and continuity within a single proposition. This capability for integration is what we call the “magic combination”. In a world which has gone “phygital”, IDEMIA conceives security in a global way, upstream of technological developments, by factoring in the customer’s environment and how they specifically use technology. In a world of ever-increasing exchanges, security primarily means protecting identities. This is why IDEMIA places Augmented Identity at the heart of its actions. Our world is constantly changing due to the advent of big and small data, large-scale economic upheaval caused by the digitalization of transactions, and new security risks to deal with. In the face of these challenges, we have assumed a position of leadership. Indeed, IDEMIA was born out of the coming together of two unique and perfectly complementary DNAs. It is the result of our talents, of the women and men who anticipate, think, design, develop, protect and market our security solutions of today and tomorrow: 13,000 employees working for a safer world. Identify and protect, contribute to progress in our society, provide every individual with a recognizable and secure identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis Study on the Compliance of Automotive Standard IATF 16949 Based on Internal Quality Audit Score in Automotive Industry
    J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng. Vol. 5, No. 4 (2018) 271–285 Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering www.journal-aprie.com Gap Analysis Study on the Compliance of Automotive Standard IATF 16949 based on Internal Quality Audit Score in Automotive Industry Tulus Puji Ruswanto , Dana Santoso Saroso Magister Industrial Engineering Programme, Postgraduate Faculty , Mercu Buana University Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan, Kembangan, Jakarta 11650. P A P E R I N F O A B S T R A C T Chronicle: In August 2016, IATF issued the new requirement of quality management system Received: 15 September 2018 IATF 16949. With these new requirements, the automotive industry that is willing Revised: 04 November 2018 to migrate to the new version will face some challenges. The main challenge comes Accepted: 13 December 2018 from the need to re-map the business processes that are needed for the internal audit. The other challenges are the readiness of the quality of the internal auditors, Keywords: measure gaps, and predict the success of the certification audits. This research is Quality Management. based on a case study at one of the automotive manufacturing company. A Internal Audit. framework for measuring the gap analysis of the compliance based on the Gap. automotive standards requirements (IATF 16949: 2016) through an internal quality Automotive Industry. audit score has presented in this research. The analysis has done by using a turtle diagram for the risk analysis and follows by a survey on an internal quality auditor’s perception. Based on the analysis, it can be determined which processes need to be audited.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae De Jacobo López Terrón
    CURRICULUM VITAE JACOBO LÓPEZ TERRÓN CURRICULUM VITAE DE JACOBO LÓPEZ TERRÓN DATOS PERSONALES Nombre: Jacobo López Terrón E-mail: Lugar de nacimiento: Ponferrada [email protected] (León) [email protected] Fecha de nacimiento: 09-06-1978 [email protected] Teléfono: 617317161 DNI: 71502002-Q FORMACIÓN ACADÉMICA LICENCIADO EN CIENCIAS QUÍMICAS (especialidad de Química Industrial): 1996-2001. Universidad de Vigo. Facultad de Ciencias. FORMACIÓN COMPLEMENTARIA MASTER EN DIRECCIÓN COMERCIAL Y MARKETING (1200 horas Lectivas). CEREM Escuela Internacional de Negocios. Calificación Sobresaliente. Marzo 2012 MASTER en “Prevención de Riesgos Laborales”: (800 horas) Centro de Iniciativas Profesionales (CIP) y Universidad Les Heures, Junio 2002. MASTER en “Gestión de Calidad” (150 horas) CIP y Universidad Les Heures, Junio 2002 MASTER en “Gestión Medioambiental”: (150 horas) CIP y Universidad Les Heures, Marzo 2002. Curso práctico de Auditorías de sistemas ISO 9000 e ISO 14000: (40 horas) Introducción a la futura norma de auditorías ISO 19011. Impartido en ISOASTUR (Gijón). 2002. Curso práctico de implantación de sistemas ISO 9000 en PYMES: (50 horas) Impartido en BERCIANA DE CALIDAD S.L. 2002. Curso práctico de mantenimiento y mejora de sistemas ISO 9000 en PYMES: (50 horas) Impartido en BERCIANA DE CALIDAD S.L. 2002. Curso práctico de implantación de sistemas ISO 14000 en PYMES: (50 horas) Impartido en BERCIANA DE CALIDAD S.L. 2002. Curso de Gestión Medioambiental en la empresa:(115 horas) Impartido en el FELE y el CEPYME. Curso Análisis de Peligros de los Puntos críticos de control (APPCC). Impartido por la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Enero 2003 Curso de implantación de sistemas de calidad en Laboratorios según ISO 17025.
    [Show full text]
  • BASF Report 2020 Economic, Environmental and Social Performance Key Data
    BASF Report 2020 Economic, environmental and social performance Key data 2020 2019 +/– 2020 2019 +/– Sales million € 59,149 59,316 –0.3% Employees at year-end 110,302 117,628 –6.2% BASF EBITDA before special itemsa million € 7,435 8,324 –10.7% Personnel expenses million € 10,576 10,924 –3.2% EBITDAa million € 6,494 8,185 –20.7% Research and 2,086 2,158 –3.3% development expenses million € EBIT before special itemsa million € 3,560 4,643 –23.3% Greenhouse gas million metric tons a c 20.8 20.1 3.5% EBIT million € –191 4,201 . emissions of CO2 equivalents Net income million € –1,060 8,421 . Energy efficiency in kilograms of sales Group 540 598 –9.7% production processes product/MWh ROCE % 1.7 7.7 – Accelerator sales million € 16,740 15,017 11.5% Earnings per share € –1.15 9.17 . Number of on-site sustainability 50 81 –38.3% Total assets million € 80,292 86,950 –7.7% audits of raw material suppliers Investments including 4,869 4,097 18.8% a Restated figures 2019; for more information, see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements from 2020 b acquisitions million € page 232 onward b Additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets At a glance c Excluding sale of energy to third parties Segment data Chemicals Million € Materials Million € Sales 2020 8,071 Sales 2020 10,736 2019 9,532 2019 11,466 EBIT before special items 2020 445 EBIT before special items 2020 835 2019 791 2019 1,003 Page 72 Page 78 Industrial Solutions Million € Surface Technologies Million € Sales 2020 7,644 Sales 2020 16,659 2019 8,389 2019 13,142 EBIT before special items 2020 822 EBIT before special items 2020 484 2019 820 2019 722 Page 83 Page 89 Nutrition & Care Million € Agricultural Solutions Million € Sales 2020 6,019 Sales 2020 7,660 2019 6,075 2019 7,814 EBIT before special items 2020 773 EBIT before special items 2020 970 2019 793 2019 1,095 Page 94 Page 100 Welcome to BASF Our integrated corporate report combines financial and sustainability reporting to inform shareholders, employees and the interested public about the 2020 business year.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 March 2017
    Automotive QMS Update IATF 16949:2016 March 2017 Background on the Revision Project • Revision work began in December 2014 and was completed in August 2016 • The team completed a 5-Phase approach to develop IATF 16949 – Pre-plan; Analyze; Build; Validate; and Deploy • Revision Work Team consisted of 17 global partners from 14 organizations (IATF OEMs, National Associations, Oversight Offices) AIAG IAOB ANFIA IATF France BMW Jaguar Land Rover FCA US LLC (formerly Chrysler) PSA Group FCA Italy S.p.A. (formerly Fiat) SMMT Ford VDA QMC GM VW 2 ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 New automotive standard: IATF 16949:2016 • IATF 16949:2016 follows the high level structure of ISO 9001:2015 • IATF 16949:2016 must be used in conjunction with ISO 9001:2015 Two (2) separate documents must be used to have all requirements IATF 16949 cannot be used as a stand-alone requirements document • 282 shalls / 16 shoulds in IATF 16949 (292 shalls / 16 shoulds in ISO/TS 16949) 3 Unprecedented stakeholder input • IATF launched a survey (via the National Associations) early June 2015 soliciting feedback from over 2,000 key stakeholders: – OEMs – Suppliers (all Tiers) – Certification Bodies – Witness Auditors – Subject Matter Experts – Oversight Offices • Over 1,700 comments were received for consideration of updates to ISO/TS 16949. • Additionally, the IATF conducted a face to face review of the draft IATF 16949 standard in Rome, Italy in April 2016 with CBs and supplier representatives. 4 Changes to Drive Value & Credibility • IATF members focused on the linkage between ISO/TS 16949 Certification and Supplier/Client quality performance – Increased focus on operational performance and customer feedback (customer scorecards/metrics) – IATF 16949 contains many former OEM Customer Specific Requirements (CSRs) – Most of the changes occurred in areas where IATF OEM’s observed weakness trends and systematic issues 5 Communication Process It was important to keep the industry informed about the project, so regular updates were posted to the IATF Global Oversight website.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Integrated Report 2020 Annual Integrated Report Year During a Tough Progress
    Kendrion N.V. Annual Integrated Report 2019 Annual Integrated Report 2020 Progress during a tough year ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY WHERE IT MATTERS Annual Integrated Report 2020 2 Ensuring optimal use of wind energy Keeping autonomous vehicles on the move 24/7 Helping save patients’ lives Brakes in the pitch control or azimuth drives of a wind Our smart distribution system for sensor cleaning keeps Our oxygen valves and pressure regulators are used in turbine help control the nacelle ensuring the blades face optical sensors clean and autonomous vehicles on the respirators around the world to enable artificial respiration the incoming wind and capture the most energy. move, in all weather conditions. on a patient (e.g. COVID-19). Increasing safety of automated guided vehicles Driving passenger safety and comfort Releasing oxygen masks Our electromagnetic brakes increase safety in trend-setting Our products for suspension systems guarantee the highest In aircraft, our locking unit make sure that oxygen masks applications, such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs). level of passenger safety and comfort in tomorrow’s are automatically released above the seats in the event of vehicles, under different driving and road conditions. a pressure drop in the cabin. Contents Profile Strategy Report of the Executive Board Outlook Report of the Supervisory Board Financial statements Annual Integrated Report 2020 3 Enabling high-energy lasers to operate safely Keeping vehicles ‘in check’ when parked Handling heavy loads safely Our optical shutter systems with rotary solenoids Our electromagnetic actuators ensure safe and reliable The demands on the crane and hoist industry range from contribute to the safety of laser-supported industrial locking of the vehicle transmission, preventing it from heavy to awkward loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Accreditation Statement
    ACCREDITATION STATEMENT Universal Quality Accreditation Services STATUS: ACTIVE ACCREDITED CODE MS/56891, PC/76892. ORGANIZATION NAME Integrated Assessment Services Pvt. Ltd., ADDRESS 1495/1,Manasarovar, 16th Main Road, Anna Nagar West Chennai, Tamil nadu , India, 600040 WEBSITE URL www.iascertification.com EMAIL [email protected] CONTACT PERSON Jaya Geetha Bose PHONE NO +91-99625 90571 ACCREDITATION STANDARD Management System Certification & Product Certification ISO/IEC 17021:2015, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO/IECTS 17021-2:2012, ISO/IEC TS 17021-3:2013, ISO/TS 22003:2013, ISO/IEC 27006:2011, ISO 50003:2014, IAF MD 1:2007, IAF MD 2:2007, IAF MD 5:2015, IAF MD11:2013, EU Directive 765/08. INTIAL CERTIFICATE DATE 16/12/2008 LATEST CERTIFICATE DATE 16/12/2018 EXPIRY DATE 15/12/2022 SCHEDULE OF ACCREDITATION: Management System Certification ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Active ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management Systems Active ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems Active ISO 22000:2018 Food Safety Management Systems Active ISO 27001:2013 Information security management systems Active ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Information technology- Service management system requirements Active ISO 13485:2016 Medical Device Quality management Systems Active IATF 16949:2016 Quality Management System Requirements for Automotive Production and Active Relevant Services Parts Organizations This document is produced for internet listing at www.uqas.org only and has current status if produced in hard copy. ISO 50001:2018
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights 2019 EN
    Products Solutions Services Highlights 2019 Measurement technology, services and solutions for process automation Liquiphant, now with Heartbeat Technology Highlights 2019 Highlights Highlights 2019 3 Contents 4 Product highlights for 2019 Temperature 5 One partner for everything – and the world 40 Temperature measurement of process automation is complete 42 Temperature measurement – thermometers 6 Simply reliable – plant reliability 43 Temperature measurement – self-calibration 8 Standardized device concepts 44 Temperature measurement – resistance 10 Heartbeat Technology thermometers 11 Heartbeat Technology for level measurement 45 Temperature measurement – transmitters 12 Heartbeat Technology for flow measurement 46 Measuring temperature profiles with 14 Industry 4.0 iTHERM MultiSens 48 Temperature measurement – temperature transmit- ters with optional Bluetooth control Field instrumentation 49 Temperature measurement – secondary containment Level 16 Level measurement Analysis 18 Optimum device design for fill level measurement- 50 Liquid analysis technology – now also available in digital format 52 Liquid analysis – pH 19 113 GHz + Your Wavelength 53 Liquid analysis – transmitters 20 SmartBlue App 54 Liquid analysis – disinfection 21 Radartechnology – in a new compact size 55 Liquid analysis – transmitters 22 Capacitive level measurement – limit switch for pow- 56 Liquid analysis – turbidity dery and fine-grained bulk solids 57 Liquid analysis – total phosphorous and phosphate 23 Successful, reliable and easy to use 24 Reliable, efficient and compact System components 58 System components 60 Easy data integration on DIN rail Pressure 26 Pressure measurement 28 With us as your partner, you have access to Automation solutions all aspects of pressure measurement technology 30 Pressure measurement – maximum precision Automation with maximum safety and reliability 62 Intelligent process automation 31 TempC – new, unique diaphragm seal 64 Cooling circuit disinfection and the 42nd regulation of the German Emissions Control Act (42.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St August 2016 COMPARISON MATRIX ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949
    1st August 2016 COMPARISON MATRIX ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 former IATF ISO/TS 16949:2016 16949:2009 Section IATF 16949:2016 Section Section Number Title Number IATF 16949:2016 Wording ISO/TS 16949 Wording (if applicable) Rationale for Change 4.3.1 Determining the scope of 1.1 and 1.2 Supporting functions, whether on-site or remote (such as design centres, corporate headquarters, ... Supporting functions, whether on-site or remote (such as These requirements were originally included in ISO/TS 16949:2009 Sections the quality management and distribution centres), shall be included in the scope of the Quality Management System design centres, corporate headquarters and distribution 1.1 and 1.2. The first requirement was slightly revised to not only address system – supplemental (QMS). centres), form part of the site audit as they support the the need to include supporting functions in the audit, but also to ensure that The only permitted exclusion for this Automotive QMS Standard relates to the product design site, but cannot obtain stand-alone certification to this the supporting functions are also included in the scope of the QMS. and development requirements within Section 8.3. The exclusion shall be justified and Technical Specification. maintained as documented information (see Section 7.5). Permitted exclusions do not include ... The only permitted exclusions for this Technical manufacturing process design. Specification relate to 7.3 where the organization is not responsible for product design and development. Permitted exclusions do not include manufacturing process design. 4.3.2 Customer-specific throughout Customer-specific requirements shall be evaluated and included in the scope of the Reference to customer-specific requirements were Although the need to fulfill and satisfy customer-specific requirements was requirements organization’s quality management system.
    [Show full text]
  • IATF 16949 Executive Overview - PJC Page 1 12/16 FOREWORD ______
    IATF 16949 The International Automotive Quality Standard AN EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW P PERRY JOHNSON CJ C O N S U L T I N G , I N C . www.pjcinc.com • 1-888-248-0256 IATF 16949 The International Automotive Quality Standard AN EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Revised 12/16 PERRY JOHNSON CONSULTING, INC. Detroit 200 East Big Beaver Rd. • Troy, Michigan 48083 1-888-248-0256 or (248) 519-2602 PJC Home Page: www.pjcinc.com • Email: [email protected] ©Copyright 2016 by PERRY JOHNSON CONSULTING, INC. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission, in writing, from Perry Johnson Consulting, Inc. IATF 16949 The International Automotive Quality Standard An Executive Overview CONTENTS Foreword .........................................................................................................................................2 The Users of This Guide ................................................................................................................3 What is IATF 16949? .....................................................................................................................4 What is ISO 9000? ..................................................................................................................5 Annex SL – A Common Structure ..........................................................................................5 The Origin of ISO 9000 ..........................................................................................................5 Deeper Origins - QS-9000, VDA
    [Show full text]