DOCSLIB.ORG

Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018 BIRTLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT PROPOSAL TITLE HERITAGE RESOURCES IMPACT ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT Heritage Permit A33-17 Manitoba Hydro Licencing and Environmental Assessment Prepared by: InterGroup Consultants Ltd. 500‐280 Smith Street Winnipeg, MB R3C 1K2 August 2018 Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY InterGroup Consultants Ltd. (InterGroup) conducted a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment (HRIA) for the proposed Birtle Transmission Project on behalf of Manitoba Hydro. The objective of the HRIA was to determine if heritage resources are situated within the development area and assess any potential impacts to heritage resources during development activities. The assessment occurred over two field programs August 21-24, 2017 and October 10-13, 2017 under Manitoba Heritage Permit A33-17. A total of 46 quarter sections were selected for heritage survey, of these 15 (33%) were unable to be assessed due to lack of landowner permission or access issues. The results of the HRIA of the proposed Birtle Transmission Project resulted in the discovery of two new archaeological sites (EcMh-66 and EdMi-7) within the proposed transmission right-of-way; however these are small, delimited sites that are of low significance. Mitigation measures and Environmental Protection Plans during construction will ensure the sites are protected from subsurface damage. Pre-construction recommendations for the ROW of the Birtle Transmission Project include: Additional testing at quarter sections (n=8) previously investigated and assessment of quarter sections (n=23) not investigated during the 2017 field season; Shovel testing of the tower foot locations within eight (n=9) selected quarter sections; and Deep testing via excavator or auger at major waterways, as requested by Manitoba’s Historic Resources Branch, Department of Sport, Culture and Heritage, to occur at tower locations situated within 100 meters of the Assiniboine River, Snake Creek and Birdtail River. Construction recommendations for the ROW of the Birtle Transmission Project include: An archaeologist monitor tower footing excavations within 100 meters of major waterways, at the two newly identified registered archaeological sites, EcMh-66 and EdMi-7, and as well as any previously registered heritage resources sites in the area. i Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018 Project Personnel Project Archaeologist Lisa C. Bobbie, M.A. (Aug 21-24 and Oct 10-13) Amber Flett, M.A. Archaeologist (Aug 21-24) Luther Sousa, B.A Archaeologist (Oct 10-13) Tamas Farkas, M.A. Community Assistant (Aug 21-24) Roy Sanderson, Gambler FN Lisa C. Bobbie, M.A. Report Preparation: Ashley Daciuk, B.A. Hons. Jennifer Olson, PhD. Reviewed By: R. Connon, MBA Daniel Szot, M.A. Candidate; GIS Mapping: Lisa C. Bobbie, M.A.; Manitoba Hydro Acknowledgements: The 2017 archaeological monitoring of the Birtle Transmission Line Project was undertaken with the cooperation of Manitoba Hydro, which arranged landowner access permission and Indigenous community contribution agreements. We gratefully acknowledge Gambler First Nation for providing valuable local knowledge and appreciate the contributions of Mr. Roy Sanderson, who assisted and supported the heritage resources fieldwork program. ii Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Archaeology – The study of past human behavior and culture through the analysis of material remains. Archaeological Site – Any location at which there are material remains, including artifacts, features, or ecofacts, proving evidence of the human past. Archaeological Site Survey – The systematic process archaeologists use to locate, identify, and record the distribution and nature of archaeological sites on the landscape. Artifact – Any portable object used, manufactured, or modified by humans that includes stone, ceramic, metal, wood, bone, or objects of other materials. Borden Number - The Borden system divides Canada up into sections based on lat/long coordinates to provide a way of designating a unique site name and location to archaeological sites. Each site is given a set of letters and a corresponding number which is the order that the site was found. Complex – A grouping of related and/or linked traits features and artifacts which comprise a complete process, activity or cultural unit. Isolated Artifact – A single artifact, unassociated with other artifacts or features, usually recovered from the surface during archaeological survey; usually not considered by itself sufficient evidence of an archaeological site. Lithic – made of stone Paleo – a prefix meaning ‘old’ or ‘ancient’. From an archaeological perspective, a term referring to the earlier inhabitants of North America and includes Clovis, Folsom and Plano complexes. Pedestrian Survey – Also called surface survey, involves walking the surface of an archaeological site or large region in stratified patterns. Scraper – An artifact used to remove the fat from the underside of a hide or to smooth wood. Shovel Test Pit (STP) – A small pit excavation into areas in which the surface is obscured by vegetation or when cultural materials are believed to lie buried in sediments; used to find sites or establish the extent of buried deposits. Site Type – A site that is the first or the best example of a particular cultural phase or tradition; reference to the characteristics of the type site helps define the cultural historical unit. Woodland Period – A cultural period recognized in areas south of the Subarctic and east of the Rockies in which agriculture, settled villages, pottery, and burial mounds usually were found; usually follows the Archaic period and begins 3000 to 2000 years ago. The Woodland Period is subdivided into two phases, Initial Woodland (e.g. Laurel) culture ca. 2500-1000 years ago and Terminal Woodland (e.g. Blackduck, Selkirk) Cultures ca. 1000 years ago prior to European contact. YRA – ‘Years ago’ iii Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................. 3 3.0 CHARACTERIZATION STUDY .......................................................................... 3 3.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................................... 3 3.2 PALEO‐ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................... 4 3.3 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ..................................................... 5 3.3.1 Early Precontact Period (Palaeo) 10,000 – 6,000 BP ....................... 5 3.3.2 Middle Precontact Period (Intensive Diversification) 6000 – 2000 BP ......................................................................................................... 6 3.3.3 Late Precontact Period (Woodland) 2000 – 350 BP ........................ 6 3.3.4 Contact Period ............................................................................................... 7 3.3.5 Settlement Period ......................................................................................... 9 4.0 PREDICTIVE MODEL .......................................................................................... 9 5.0 HERITAGE RESOURCE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................ 14 5.1 PRE‐INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................ 14 5.1.1 Previously Registered Heritage Resources ...................................... 14 5.1.2 Heritage Resources in Proximity to Preliminary Preferred Route .............................................................................................................. 15 5.1.3 Land‐based Selection of Areas of Potential along PPR ................. 17 5.2 METHODOLOGY AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................... 19 5.3 PHASE I – AUGUST 21 TO 24, 2017 ...................................................................... 20 5.3.1 SE and NE‐24‐16‐28W Snake Creek (New Archaeological Site, EcMh‐66 “Double Buckle”) ........................................................... 20 5.3.2 SW and NW‐36‐16‐28W Canola Field ................................................. 25 5.3.3 SE‐2‐17‐28W Wheat Field ....................................................................... 25 5.3.4 SW‐22‐16‐27W and SE and SW‐21‐16‐27W Birdtail River ......... 25 5.3.5 NE and NW‐3‐18‐29W Upper Ridges of Assiniboine River West ................................................................................................................ 26 iv Birtle Transmission Project Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Technical Report Heritage Permit A33-17 August 2018 5.3.6 NE‐5‐18‐28W ............................................................................................... 27 5.4 HRIA PHASE II – OCTOBER 10 TO 13, 2017 ...................................................... 27 5.4.1 NE‐18‐16‐26W Birtle Transformer Station ...................................... 28 5.4.2 SW‐19‐16‐26W
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio
    VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2Nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S
    Santa Cruz Archaeological Society Newsletter Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S. Navy Story Number: NNS130716-29) The Navy discovered a significant prehistoric artifact 90 miles west of San Diego on San Clemente Island (SCI) located mid-island at a newly discovered archeological site. A boat effigy made of submarine volcano lava was spotted at the surface of the site during an archeology survey. The boat effigy represents a type of boat used by the California Indians who occupied the California Channels and adjacent southern California mainland at the time of the Spanish "discovery" in the AD 1500s. Dr. Andy Yatsko, Senior Archaeologist and Region Southwest Archaeologist for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest in San Diego, who has over 40 years experience in prehistoric and historic archaeology finds the boat effigy to be an uncommon find. "Boat effigies like the one found are exceedingly rare in the archaeological record, with this being my first one recovered during my 30 year tenure with SCI," said Dr. Yatsko [image courtesy U.S. Navy]. "Finding artifacts on the surface of archaeological sites at the island is not unusual, but a rare one like this is always exciting to come across." The effigy was created from submarine volcano lava. This lava differs from the lava that flows on the mainland because the vesicles are smaller, making it more brittle and more difficult to handle. “The vesicle volcanic material used is hard and brittle but somehow they were able to craft a fine little carving out of it to represent an important part of their culture," said Yatsko.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint
    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Guide
    VISITOR GUIDE 2017 Contents 3 Celebrate Canada 150 4 Welcome 5 Calendar of events 6 The Franklin Expedition 6 Artists in Residence 7 Visitor Centre 8-9 Guided experiences 10 Indigenous People of Riding Mountain 11 Bison and Wildlife 12-13 Camping 14-15 Trails 16-17 Riding Mountain National Park map 18 Wasagaming map 19 Clear Lake map 20-21 Welcome to Wasagaming 22-23 History of Riding Mountain 24 Clear Lake Country 25-27 The Shops at Clear Lake 28 Friends of Riding Mountain National Park 29 Photo Contest 30-33 Visitor Information 34 Winter in Riding Mountain 35 Contact Information Discover and Xplore the park Get your Xplorer booklet at the Visitor Centre and begin your journey through Riding Mountain. Best suited for 6 to 11-year-olds. 2 RidingNP RidingNP Parks Canada Discovery Pass The Discovery Pass provides unlimited opportunities to enjoy over 100 National Parks, National Historic Sites, and National Marine Conservation Areas across Canada. Parks Canada is happy to offer free admission for all visitors to all places operated by Parks Canada in 2017 to celebrate the 150th anniversary of Confederation. For more information regarding the Parks Canada Discovery Pass, please visit pc.gc.ca/eng/ar-sr/lpac-ppri/ced-ndp.aspx. Join the Celebration with Parks Canada! 2017 marks the 150th anniversary of Canadian Confederation and we invite you to celebrate with Parks Canada! Take advantage of free admission to national parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas for the entire year. Get curious about Canada’s unique natural treasures, hear stories about Indigenous cultures, learn to camp and paddle and celebrate the centennial of Canada’s national historic sites with us.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee
    From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Miller, Darcy Shane Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 09:33:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/320030 From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee by Darcy Shane Miller __________________________ Copyright © Darcy Shane Miller 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Darcy Shane Miller, titled From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Vance T. Holliday _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Steven L. Kuhn _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Mary C. Stiner _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) David G. Anderson Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Version 1
    American Electric Power 1 Riverside Plaza Legal Department Columbus, OH 43215-2373 AEP.com December 16, 2016 Chairman Asim Z. Haque Ohio Power Siting Board 180 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Erin C. Miller Contract Counsel – (614) 716-2942 (P) (614) 716-2014 (F) Re: PUCO Case No. 16-2315-EL-BNR [email protected] In the Matter of the Construction Notice for the Glencoe Station Expansion Part II Dear Chairman Haque, Attached please find a copy of the Construction Notice for the above-referenced Transmission Line Project submitted by AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc. (“AEP Ohio Transco”). This filing and notice is in accordance with O.A.C. 4906- 6-05. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Erin C. Miller Erin C. Miller Contract Counsel AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc. cc: Jon Pawley, OPSB Staff CONSTRUCTION NOTICE FOR THE GLENCOE STATION EXPANSION PART II Case No. 16-2315-EL-BNR Submitted pursuant to OAC 4906-6-01 AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc. DECEMBER 16, 2016 CONSTRUCTION NOTICE Glencoe Station Expansion Project Part II American Electric Power Ohio Transmission Company, Inc. (“AEP Ohio Transco”) provides this Construction Notice (“CN”) to the Ohio Power Siting Board in accordance with the accelerated requirements of Ohio Administrative Code (“O.A.C.”) Chapter 4906-6-05. 4906-6-05(B) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. The applicant shall provide the name of the project and applicant's reference number, names and reference number(s) of resulting circuits, a brief description of the project, and why the project meets the requirements for a construction notice application.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory – Indigenous Organizations in Manitoba
    Indigenous Organizations in Manitoba A directory of groups and programs organized by or for First Nations, Inuit and Metis people Community Development Corporation Manual I 1 INDIGENOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN MANITOBA A Directory of Groups and Programs Organized by or for First Nations, Inuit and Metis People Compiled, edited and printed by Indigenous Inclusion Directorate Manitoba Education and Training and Indigenous Relations Manitoba Indigenous and Municipal Relations ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The directory of Indigenous organizations is designed as a useful reference and resource book to help people locate appropriate organizations and services. The directory also serves as a means of improving communications among people. The idea for the directory arose from the desire to make information about Indigenous organizations more available to the public. This directory was first published in 1975 and has grown from 16 pages in the first edition to more than 100 pages in the current edition. The directory reflects the vitality and diversity of Indigenous cultural traditions, organizations, and enterprises. The editorial committee has made every effort to present accurate and up-to-date listings, with fax numbers, email addresses and websites included whenever possible. If you see any errors or omissions, or if you have updated information on any of the programs and services included in this directory, please call, fax or write to the Indigenous Relations, using the contact information on the
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Stakeholders in Resource Development Or Protection of Human Health
    REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS IN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OR PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH In this section: First Nations and First Nations Organizations ...................................................... 1 Tribal Council Environmental Health Officers (EHO’s) ......................................... 8 Government Agencies with Roles in Human Health .......................................... 10 Health Canada Environmental Health Officers – Manitoba Region .................... 14 Manitoba Government Departments and Branches .......................................... 16 Industrial Permits and Licensing ........................................................................ 16 Active Large Industrial and Commercial Companies by Sector........................... 23 Agricultural Organizations ................................................................................ 31 Workplace Safety .............................................................................................. 39 Governmental and Non-Governmental Environmental Organizations ............... 41 First Nations and First Nations Organizations 1 | P a g e REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS FIRST NATIONS AND FIRST NATIONS ORGANIZATIONS Berens River First Nation Box 343, Berens River, MB R0B 0A0 Phone: 204-382-2265 Birdtail Sioux First Nation Box 131, Beulah, MB R0H 0B0 Phone: 204-568-4545 Black River First Nation Box 220, O’Hanley, MB R0E 1K0 Phone: 204-367-8089 Bloodvein First Nation General Delivery, Bloodvein, MB R0C 0J0 Phone: 204-395-2161 Brochet (Barrens Land) First Nation General Delivery,
    [Show full text]
  • Gambler First Nation Communicable Disease Emergency Plan
    Gambler First Nation Communicable Disease Emergency Plan (Appendix “F” Community Emergency Response Plan) 2021 Gambler First Nation would like to thank the Ebb and Flow First Nation Health Authority Inc. for graciously sharing their plan template with our community. 0 Table of Contents SECTION 1: OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Purpose and Scope ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Plan Review/Maintenance/Distribution ..................................................................................... 4 1.4 Training and Exercises .................................................................................................................. 5 1.5 Mutual Aid Agreements ............................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Context for a Communicable Disease Emergency ....................................................................... 6 1.7 Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.7.1 Community Level Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 6 1.7.2 Provincial
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Traditional Land and Resource Use
    CA PDF Page 1 of 92 Energy East Project Part B: Saskatchewan and Manitoba Volume 16: Socio-Economic Effects Assessment Section 5: Traditional Land and Resource Use This section was not updated in 2015, so it contains figures and text descriptions that refer to the October 2014 Project design. However, the analysis of effects is still valid. This TLRU assessment is supported by Volume 25, which contains information gathered through TLRU studies completed by participating Aboriginal groups, oral traditional evidence and TLRU-specific results of Energy East’s aboriginal engagement Program from April 19, 2014 to December 31, 2015. The list of First Nation and Métis communities and organizations engaged and reported on is undergoing constant revision throughout the discussions between Energy East and potentially affected Aboriginal groups. Information provided through these means relates to Project effects and cumulative effects on TLRU, and recommendations for mitigating effects, as identified by participating Aboriginal groups. Volume 25 for Prairies region provides important supporting information for this section; Volume 25 reviews additional TRLU information identifies proposed measures to mitigate potential effects of the Project on TRLU features, activities, or sites identified, as appropriate. The TLRU information provided in Volume 25 reflects Project design changes that occurred in 2015. 5 TRADITIONAL LAND AND RESOURCE USE Traditional land and resource use (TLRU)1 was selected as a valued component (VC) due to the potential for the Project to affect traditional activities, sites and resources identified by Aboriginal communities. Project Aboriginal engagement activities and the review of existing literature (see Appendix 5A.2) confirmed the potential for Project effects on TLRU.
    [Show full text]
  • Birtle Transmission Project Environmental Assessment Report
    5.0 Environmental and socio-economic setting 5.1 Overview This chapter provides an overview of the physical, ecological (aquatic and terrestrial), and socio-economic environment with respect to the Project. It begins with a summary of the regional setting that discusses historic, present and potential future conditions for the region. The physical environment section then provides information on the existing: • Atmospheric conditions(climate, noise and air quality); • Surface water; • Geology and hydrogeology; and • Terrain and soils. This is followed by a section on the existing ecological environment, which discusses: • Fish habitat and resources; • Vegetation; • Terrestrial invertebrates; • Reptiles; • Amphibians; • Mammals; and • Birds. The socio-economic environment section then provides information on: • Population; • Infrastructure and services; • Employment and economy; • Property and residential development; • Agriculture; • Other commercial resource use; • Recreation and tourism; • Health; 5-1 • Traditional land and resource use; and • Heritage resources. The information in this chapter provides the basis of this environmental assessment. Additional information regarding the existing physical and ecological environment is provided in Appendix D, and additional information regarding the socioeconomic environment is provided in Appendix E. 5.2 Regional setting summary 5.2.1 Historic conditions The Project is located in the Interior Plains Physiographic Region, which covers southwest Manitoba, southern Saskatchewan and most of Alberta (Weir 2012). The generally low relief and soils in the area were formed through retreating glaciers and Lake Agassiz, and are generally very fertile. Relief in the region is primarily as a result of large rivers such as the Assiniboine and its tributaries, which have eroded deep valleys and ravines in some areas.
    [Show full text]