DOCSLIB.ORG

FHWA Manual for Orthotropic Deck Bridges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FHWA Manual for Orthotropic Deck Bridges Publication No. FHWA-IF-12-027 February 2012 US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MANUAL FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ORTHOTROPIC STEEL DECK BRIDGES Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-IF-12-027 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Manual for Design, Construction, and Maintenance of Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridges 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert Connor, John Fisher, Walter Gatti, Vellore Gopalaratnam, Brian Kozy, Brian Leshko, David L. McQuaid, Ronald Medlock, Dennis Mertz, Thomas Murphy, Duncan Paterson, Ove Sorensen, John Yadlosky 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) HDR Engineering Inc., 11. Contract or Grant No. 11 Stanwix Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 DTFH61-07-D-00004 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary Notes The FHWA Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) was Raj Ailaney. Front cover photograph is a fabricated deck segment for the new San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Self Anchored Suspension Span. Reprinted with permission from Metropolitan Transportation Commission and photographer Tom Paiva (www.tompaiva.com). 16. Abstract This Manual covers the relevant issues related to orthotropic steel deck bridge engineering, including analysis, design, detailing, fabrication, testing, inspection, evaluation, and repair. It includes a discussion of some the various applications of orthotropic bridge construction to provide background with case study examples. It also provides basic criteria for the establishment of a cost-effective and serviceable orthotropic bridge cross section with detailing geometry that has been used on recent projects worldwide. The manual covers both the relevant information necessary for the engineering analysis of the orthotropic steel bridge and the requirements for complete design of orthotropic steel bridge superstructures. Additionally, design details such as materials, corrosion protection, minimum proportions, and connection geometry are addressed as well as basic fabrication, welding, and erection procedures. Portions of the manual also cover methods for maintaining and evaluating orthotropic bridges, including inspection and load rating. Wearing surfaces are also covered in depth. The culmination of all the information is demonstrated in two design examples. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Steel Bridges No restrictions. This document is available Bridge Decks to the public through NTIS: Orthotropic Steel Deck National Technical Information Service Orthotropic Bridge Design 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandria, VA 22312 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 262 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find Symbol LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km AREA in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 megagrams (or "metric ton") Mg (or "t") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) oF Fahrenheit 5 (F-32)/9 Celsius oC or (F-32)/1.8 ILLUMINATION fc foot-candles 10.76 lux lx fl foot-Lamberts 3.426 candela/m2 cd/m2 FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS lbf poundforce 4.45 newtons N lbf/in2 poundforce per square inch 6.89 kilopascals kPa APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find Symbol LENGTH mm millimeters 0.039 inches in m meters 3.28 feet ft m meters 1.09 yards yd km kilometers 0.621 miles mi AREA mm2 square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in2 m2 square meters 10.764 square feet ft2 m2 square meters 1.195 square yards yd2 ha hectares 2.47 acres ac km2 square kilometers 0.386 square miles mi2 VOLUME mL milliliters 0.034 fluid ounces fl oz L liters 0.264 gallons gal m3 cubic meters 35.314 cubic feet ft3 m3 cubic meters 1.307 cubic yards yd3 MASS g grams 0.035 ounces oz kg kilograms 2.202 pounds lb Mg (or "t") megagrams (or "metric ton") 1.103 short tons (2000 lb) T TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) oC Celsius 1.8C+32 Fahrenheit oF ILLUMINATION lx lux 0.0929 foot-candles fc cd/m2 candela/m2 0.2919 foot-Lamberts fl FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS N newtons 0.225 poundforce lbf kPa kilopascals 0.145 poundforce per square inch lbf/in2 *SI is the symbol for the International System of Units. Appropriate rounding should be made to comply with Section 4 of ASTM E380. (Revised March 2003) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 4 1.1 Introduction to Orthotropic Bridge Decks .......................................................................... 4 1.2 Organization of the Manual ................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2 - BRIDGE APPLICATIONS .............................................................................. 10 2.1 General Background ......................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Plate Girder Bridges .......................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Box Girder Bridges ........................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Suspended Span Bridges ................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Bridge Redecking.............................................................................................................. 15 2.6 Movable Bridges ............................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 3 - TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTIONS ..................................................................... 18 3.1 General Layout.................................................................................................................. 18 3.2 Orthotropic Panel Details .................................................................................................. 19 3.2.1 Open Rib Systems .................................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Closed Rib Systems ................................................................................................. 21 3.2.3 Rib Proportioning..................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 4 – STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS ........................................... 24 4.1 Evolving Practices ............................................................................................................ 24 4.2 Behavioral Mechanisms .................................................................................................... 30 4.2.1 Local Deck Plate Deformation – System 1 .............................................................. 31 4.2.2 Panel Deformation – System 2 ................................................................................ 32 4.2.3 Rib Longitudinal Flexure – System 3 ...................................................................... 34 4.2.4 Floorbeam In-Plane Flexure – System 4 .................................................................. 35 4.2.5 Floorbeam Distortion – System 5 ............................................................................ 36 4.2.6 Rib Distortion – System 6 ........................................................................................ 40 4.2.7 Global
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Wearing Surface Systems for the Orthotropic Steel Deck of the San Mateo Hayward Bridge
    EVALUATION OF WEARING SURFACE SYSTEMS FOR THE ORTHOTROPIC STEEL DECK OF THE SAN MATEO HAYWARD BRIDGE _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science _____________________________________________________ by Ravi Sankar Chamarthi, Vellore S. Gopalaratnam, Thesis Supervisor December, 2012 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled EVALUATION OF WEARING SURFACE SYSTEMS FOR THE ORTHOTROPIC STEEL DECK OF THE SAN MATEO HAYWARD BRIDGE Presented by Ravi Sankar Chamarthi, a candidate for the degree of Master of Science and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Vellore S. Gopalaratnam Sarah Orton P. Frank Pai i EVALUATION OF WEARING SURFACE SYSTEMS FOR THE ORTHOTROPIC STEEL DECK OF THE SAN MATEO HAYWARD BRIDGE Ravi Sankar Chamarthi Dr. Vellore S. Gopalaratnam Thesis supervisor ABSTRACT Performance under static and fatigue loads are evaluated for two different wearing surfaces for possible use on the steel orthotropic deck of San Mateo Hayward Bridge in the bay area of California. The two wearing surface materials studied include a 2" thick (nominal) premixed polyester concrete (PC) and a 2" thick (nominal) epoxy asphalt concrete (EAC). Flexural specimens that comprise a “steel-plate - wearing surface” composite simulating the surfacing system and geometry specific to the orthotropic steel deck of the San Mateo Hayward Bridge are used for the static and fatigue tests. Flexural tests were conducted at different dynamic loading frequencies (0.0167, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 and 15.0 Hz) and at several different temperatures (20˚F- 120˚F) to study the temperature dependency and loading rate effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Photographer One of the Most Famous Views in Venice - from St Mark’S Square Over to San Giorgio Maggiore a Snapshot on Europe
    Enjoy helpful photography tips & tutorials while on a snapshOt On tour eurOpe NETHERLANDS, GERMANY, AUSTRIA, ITALY, SWITZERLAND, FRANCE & ENGLAND 12 DAYS DEPARTING 08 AUGUST 2012 ACCOMPANIED BY A PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER One of the most famous views in Venice - from St Mark’s Square over to San Giorgio Maggiore A Snapshot on Europe Do you have a passion for photography and Austrian border continue to Innsbruck, capital of the Tyrol. panoramas of the breathtaking Alpine scenery. Free time to would love to improve your skills? Imagine Tour the architectural jewels of the city, seeing the 14C houses take in the air and perhaps some refreshment before of the old town, Imperial Palace and Golden Roof. (BB) descending to your hotel in Lucerne. (BB) witnessing all the iconic highlights of Europe, from the canals of Amsterdam to the pomp DAy 5 – SUN 12 AUG 12 INNSBRUCK – VENICE DAy 8 – WED 15 AUG: WATERFALLS EXCURSION and pageantry of London while enjoying the Hotel: Bellini Boscolo Cameras at the ready as you embark on a scenic excursion to Leave Innsbruck and travel across the impressive Europa Lauterbrunnen in the ‘Valley of Waterfalls’. See the Staubbach company of an expert Tour Director PLUS a Bridge, and cross the Brenner Pass into Italy. Follow the Adige Falls plunging 300 meters and there is the opportunity of professional photographer who’ll teach you tips River through spectacular scenery down to the great plain. taking the funicular up to the Trümmelbach Falls, leaping and and techniques that will help you capture some Visit fascinating Verona, with its first century Roman Arena, gushing through a series of vast eroded potholes - an of the world’s most photogenic cities and sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Mechanical Behaviors of Orthotropic Deck of Highway Bridge
    6th International Conference on Machinery, Materials, Environment, Biotechnology and Computer (MMEBC 2016) Study on Mechanical Behaviors of Orthotropic Deck of Highway Bridge Bing Han1,a,Qianhui Pu1,b, Leiping Xu1-2,c ,Shili Yang1,d, Liangjun Chen1,e 1School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031,China; 2China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd.,China [email protected], b [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] Keywords: Orthotropic Deck; Mechanic Behavior; Finite Element Method; Welding Details Abstract. In order to investigate mechanic behaviors of the orthotropic deck welding conformation details of highway steel bridge, take Zhongdu Yangtze River Bridge located in Jiangjin of Chongqing district as an engineering background, the 3-dimension spatial section model of steel box girder was firstly established based on the numerical finite element method, and then the stress level of welding conformation including the top plate of orthotropic deck, stiffening rib and transverse diaphragm was studied. The numerical analyzed results show that the stress level of welding conformation is mainly influenced by the second system and the third system. The mechanical performance of box girder is specifically represented as global bending action, global shearing action and local supporting action, which reflects significant local stress state. Also, the degree of the above mentioned actions for different conformation details is different. Introduction Orthotropic deck has advantages of light weight, high strength, large bearing capacity, fast installation speed, beautiful appearance and wide application range, which is frequently used in long-span bridge structures. However, due to the complicated space welding structures, it is easy to cause the fatigue crack of the orthotropic bridge deck [1][6].
    [Show full text]
  • Dodam Bridge
    A GLOBAL BRIDGE World’s Longest Sea Bridge NETWORK SYSTRA has been a world leader in the World’s Longest Floating Bridge fi eld of transportation infrastructure for 60 years. Bridges are a major product SHEIKH JABER AL-AHMAD AL-SABAH CAUSEWAY line and a cornerstone of our technical Kuwait MONTREAL excellence in providing safe, effi cient, PARIS SEOUL and economical solutions. SAN DIEGO EVERGREEN POINT FLOATING BRIDGE World’s Longest Span International Bridge Technologies joined Seattle, Washington Railway Cable-Stayed Bridge NEW DELHI SYSTRA in 2017. The two companies DUBAI have combined their complementary World’s Longest technical expertise to offer specialized Concrete Span engineering services in all facets of bridge TIANXINGZHOU BRIDGE design, construction, and maintenance. China World’s Fastest Design & SYSTRA’s Global Bridge Network consists Construction Supervision on any Metro Project of over 350 bridge specialists deployed 3rd PANAMA CANAL CROSSING worldwide, with Bridge Design Centers Colón, Panama World’s Longest located in San Diego, Montreal, São Paolo, Double Suspension Bridge SÃO PAOLO Paris, Dubai, New Delhi, and Seoul. MECCA (MMMP) METRO Saudi Arabia CHACAO BRIDGE BRIDGE DESIGN CENTERS Chacao, Chile • SERVICES • Tender Preparation • BIM / BrIM • Conceptual Design • Complex Drafting & Specialized Detailing • Pre-Bid Engineering • Realistic Graphics • Proposal Preparation - 3D Renderings - Visual Animation • Specifications Preparation - Construction Sequence Animation • Bids Analysis • Technical Assistance During Construction
    [Show full text]
  • Deck Design for Steel Bridges
    Deck Design for Steel Bridges Four (4) Continuing Education Hours Course #CV1218 Approved Continuing Education for Licensed Professional Engineers EZ-pdh.com Ezekiel Enterprises, LLC 301 Mission Dr. Unit 571 New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170 800-433-1487 [email protected] Deck Design for Steel Bridges Ezekiel Enterprises, LLC Course Description: The Deck Design for Steel Bridges course satisfies four (4) hours of professional development. The course is designed as a distance learning course that offers insight for engineers in decking options and design considerations for steel bridges. Objectives: The primary objective of this course is to enable the student to understand design options & methods for various steel bridge deck types such as concrete deck slabs, metal grid decks, orthotropic steel decks, wood decks, and several others. Grading: Students must achieve a minimum score of 70% on the online quiz to pass this course. The quiz may be taken as many times as necessary to successful pass and complete the course. A copy of the quiz questions are attached to last pages of this document. ii Deck Design for Steel Bridges Ezekiel Enterprises, LLC Table of Contents Deck Design for Steel Bridges 1. Introduction ...................................................... 1 2. Concrete Deck Slabs ........................................... 2 3. Metal Grid Decks ............................................. 19 4. Orthotropic Steel Decks ................................... 26 5. Wood Decks ..................................................... 31 6. Other Deck Systems ......................................... 34 Quiz Questions ...................................... 38 iii Deck Design for Steel Bridges Ezekiel Enterprises, LLC 1.0 INTRODUCTION This course provides practical information regarding the decking options and design considerations for steel bridges, presenting deck types such as concrete deck slabs, metal grid decks, orthotropic steel decks, wood decks, and several others.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial and Replacement Riding Surface for the Orthotropic San Mateo/Hayward Bridge
    Bridge Structures 13 (2017) 81–92 81 DOI:10.3233/BRS-170116 IOS Press Initial and replacement riding surface for the orthotropic San Mateo/Hayward Bridge R. Maggentia and S. Shatnawib,∗ aPECG, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, USA bShatec Engineering Consultants, LLC, El Dorado Hills, CA, USA Abstract. When opened in 1967, the San Mateo/Hayward Bridge crossing the San Francisco Bay south of San Francisco incorporated the United States’ first major orthotropic steel bridge deck. The mile long orthotropic steel deck of the bridge was the largest in the world at the time. The orthotropic deck is included within a 2 mile long steel high rise portion of the 7 mile long bridge. Over 40 materials were evaluated for the riding surface of the original orthotropic deck. Epoxy asphalt was chosen and remained in place well past its life expectancy until it was finally replaced in 2015 by a polyester concrete material. The paper chronicles the factors leading to the selection of the material and construction of the initial and replacement riding surface. The replacement needed to be done on a critical bridge in service connecting the East-Bay Area communities to San Francisco. This made accelerated construction a factor in choosing a replacement and motivated evaluation of polyester concrete as a possibility. Keywords: Orthotropic bridge deck, epoxy asphalt, polyester concrete, accelerated bridge construction, overlay, riding surface, wearing surface 1. Introduction orthotropic decks a separate riding surface on the steel plates is inherently required. The subject of this paper is the riding surface for Orthotropic is derived from the terms ‘orthogo- the orthotropic portion of the San Mateo/Hayward nal’ meaning having properties at 90 degree angles Bridge deck.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Gate Bridge History Golden Gate Bridge History
    Golden Gate Bridge History Golden Gate Bridge History • August 27, 1930: Joseph B. Strauss submits final plans • January 5, 1933: Construction officially starts • January-June 1933: Marin pier construction • November 1933-June 1934: Marin tower construction • March 1933-November 1934: San Francisco pier fender construction • November 1934-January 1935: San Francisco pier construction • January-June 1935: San Francisco tower construction • August 1935-April 1937: Superstructure construction • May 27, 1937: Grand Opening Golden Gate Bridge Statistics • 8,891 ft. total length with 4,200 ft. main span • 220 ft. vertical waterway clearance • 7,260 ft. of 36 in. diameter cable with 80,000 miles of wire • Towers – 746 ft. above water and 500 ft. above roadway – 44,000 tons and more than 600,000 rivets in each Golden Gate Bridge Statistics • Maximum design downward deflection = 10.8 ft. • Maximum design transverse deflection = 27.7 ft. • 38 million crossings per year (3.3 million in 1937) San Francisco (South) Tower Pier • Constructed within dewatered fender • Fender details – Encloses football field-sized area – Over 120 ft. maximum height in 75 ft. average water depth – 40 ft. maximum wall thickness – Over 105,000 cu. yds. of concrete – Pier protection from fog-bound ships San Francisco (South) Tower Pier • 140 ft. long by 66 ft. wide • Supports two 34 ft. by 33 ft. tower legs • Foundation keyed into bedrock at 110 ft. below sea level • 23,500 cu. yds. of concrete • Within 40 ft. thick fender walls Marin (North) Tower Pier • Constructed within dewatered cofferdam • Same general size as South Tower Pier • Supports two 54 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Europe with Eurostar™ Extension Your Itinerary
    Traditional Europe with Eurostar™ Extension Your itinerary Start Location Visited Location Plane End Location Cruise Train Over night Ferry Day 1 brave gladiators once fought to the applause of exhilarated spectators, then Welcome to London enjoy views of Circus Maximus which once hosted chariot races. The rest of the day is yours to explore the sights and sounds of this remarkable city. Ramble Spend the day exploring the pomp and pageantry of a city that effortlessly through Rome's grand boulevards, shop up a storm on the Via del Corso or combines old and new. perhaps take an Optional Excursion to see Michelangelo's beautiful frescoes on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Hotel - The Tower/Park Plaza Riverbank Included Meals - Breakfast Day 2 Discover Historic London Day 12 The Ruins of Pompeii with Sunny Join a Local Specialist this morning for a tour of the iconic sites of London, including Big Ben, the imposing Houses of Parliament and Westminster Abbey. Sorrento Your afternoon is at leisure to go shopping on Carnaby Street, visit one of the Enjoy a scenic drive through the vineyards of Frascati into the Campania region captivating museums or wander along the Thames watching ambitious where we'll meet a Local Specialist who will share the fascinating story of Pompeii, Londoners go about on their day-to-day. a city buried in ash and lost for centuries following the eruption of Mount Included Meals - Breakfast Vesuvius. We arrive in the sophisticated seaside retreat of Sorrento this evening where we will spend the night. Day 3 Eurostar to Brussels and on to Hotel - Cardinal St.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Testing of an Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridge RAYMOND EUGENE DAVIS, California Division of Highways
    Field Testing of an Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridge RAYMOND EUGENE DAVIS, California Division of Highways Field studies were made of an orthotropic steel deck bridge to investigate (a) correlations between observed structural behavior and that predicted by theoretical analyses, either existing or derived in the course of the project; (b) construction and fabri­ cation problems; and (c) durability of two types of wearing sur­ faces and various methods of application. The nature of the structure, the large number of transducer circuits (over 1,200), and the requirement for expeditious acquisition of data required some unique loading methods as well as sophisticated machinery for transducer reading and data reduction, tabulation, and plot­ ting. Equipment was constructed to apply large, single or mul­ tiple, concentrated loads to the steel deck. Data reduction and plotting methods were developed. Cost of the structure was very high, as might be expected in the short-span range em­ ployed. Moreover, it has demonstrated a particular vulnerabil­ ity to icing. •THIS PAPER describes a research project pertinent to an orthotropic steel deck plate bridge. The program is being conducted by the California Division of Highways, Bridge and Materials and Research Departments, in cooperation with the University of Cali­ fornia, Berkeley, and the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads. Work has been in progress since 1963. The specific objectives of the project are to (a) establish correlations between em­ pirically observed structural behavior of an orthotropic steel deck plate bridge and theoretical behavior based on analyses either existing or to be derived as part of the -----------• /1-\ .! -----L.!--L- ----L----L!-- --..:I .l:-L--.!--L.!-- ---'-1 ----- l! -- LL!- L---- -l! -L---- }J.1 u~.1:a.111, \U / J.11 Vt;:~l,J.~ct.Lt:: \,;UU.:>L.1 U\;L.1UU i::UlU .Li::LUJ.:.11.,;c:1.LJ.VU ,lJ.1 uu.u:aUib .LVJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3t27x1w3 Journal Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(6) ISSN 0733-9445 Authors Conte, Joel P He, Xianfei Moaveni, Babak et al. Publication Date 2008-06-01 DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(1006) Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, ST/2006/025227, Revised Version: 06/07/2007 Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge Joel P. Conte1, Member, ASCE, Xianfei He2, Babak Moaveni3, Sami F. Masri4, John P. Caffrey5, Mazen Wahbeh6, Farzad Tasbihgoo7, Daniel H. Whang8, and Ahmed Elgamal9, Member, ASCE Abstract This paper describes a set of dynamic field tests performed on the Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge (AZMB), also known as the New Carquinez Bridge, which is located 32km northeast of San Francisco on interstate Highway I-80. The AZMB, opened to traffic in November 2003, is the first suspension bridge in the United States with an orthotropic steel deck, reinforced concrete towers and large-diameter drilled shaft foundations. The dynamic field tests described herein were conducted just before the bridge opening to traffic. They included ambient vibration tests, mainly wind-induced, and forced vibration tests based on controlled traffic loads and vehicle-induced impact loads. Four different controlled traffic load patterns and seven different vehicle-induced impact load configurations were used in the forced vibration tests. The dynamic response of the bridge was measured through an array of 34 uni-axial and 10 tri-axial force- balanced accelerometers deployed along the whole length of the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St World Congress on Agritourism
    1st World Congress on Agritourism Eurac Research Bozen/Bolzano, 7-9 November 2018 In collaboration with AUTONOME PROVINCIA PROVINZ AUTONOMA BOZEN DI BOLZANO SÜDTIROL ALTO ADIGE With the support of PROGRAMME 1st World Congress on Agritourism 7-9 November, 2018 Eurac Research Bolzano/Bozen Italy 05.11.2018 Advisory Board Thomas Streifeneder, (Chair), Eurac Research - Institute for Regional Development, Italy Thomas Dax, Federal Institute for Less-Favoured and Mountainous Areas (BABF), Germany Christian Fischer, Free University of Bozen, Italy Tor Arnesen, Eastern Norway Research Institute (ENRI), Norway Carla Barbieri, North Carolina State University, USA Hans Embacher, Urlaub am Bauernhof Österreich, Austria Daniela Tommasini, University of Lapland, Finland Claudia Gil Arroyo, University of Missouri, USA Ciervo Margherita, University of Foggia, Italy Hans J. Kienzl, Südtiroler Bauernbund - Farm Holidays in South Tyrol, Italy Andrea Omizzolo, Eurac Research - Institute for Regional Development, Italy Organising Committee Andrea Omizzolo, Eurac Research - Institute for Regional Development (Chair) Thomas Streifeneder, Eurac Research - Institute for Regional Development (Co-Chair) Eleonora Psenner, Eurac Research - Institute for Regional Development Karin Helga Amor, Eurac Research - Communication Department Alexa De Marchi, Eurac Research - Meeting Management Pier Paolo Mariotti, Eurac Research - Meeting Management Hans J. Kienzl, Südtiroler Bauernbund - Farm Holidays in South Tyrol Helmuth Zanotti, IDM Südtirol - Alto Adige 2 PROGRAMME OVERVIEW Updated congress programme: http://agritourism.eurac.edu/editions/2018-edition/programme/ 3 Our Commitment to sustainability We are glade to inform you that the congress has been certified as a Green Event by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen. Our congress’ commitment is to reach a high sustainability level. Wherever possible, we have incorporated green meeting planning standards that reduce waste, used recycled materials and lessen energy usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of an Orthotropic Deck Stiffened with a Cement-Based Overlay
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 04, 2021 Analysis of an Orthotropic Deck Stiffened with a Cement-Based Overlay Walter, Rasmus; Olesen, John Forbes; Stang, Henrik; Vejrum, Tina Published in: Journal of Bridge Engineering Link to article, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:3(350) Publication date: 2007 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Walter, R., Olesen, J. F., Stang, H., & Vejrum, T. (2007). Analysis of an Orthotropic Deck Stiffened with a Cement-Based Overlay. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12(3), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084- 0702(2007)12:3(350) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Analysis of an Orthotropic Deck Sti®ened with a Cement-Based Overlay Rasmus Walter*, John F. Olesen*, Henrik Stang*, & Tina Vejrum** *Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs.
    [Show full text]