DOCSLIB.ORG

John Wheeler, Relativity, and Quantum Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Wheeler, Relativity, and Quantum Information John Wheeler, relativity, and quantum information Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, and Wojciech H. Zurek From the mid-1950s on, John Wheeler’s “radical conservative-ism” allowed him to explore without fear crazy-sounding ideas that often led to profound physical insights. Charles Misner is professor of physics, emeritus, at the University of Maryland. Kip Thorne is Feynman Professor of Theoretical Physics at the California Institute of Technology. Wojciech Zurek is a laboratory fellow at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Two were John Wheeler’s PhD students, Misner in 1954–57 and Thorne in 1962–65; Zurek was his student in 1976–79 and his postdoc in 1979–81. Misner and Thorne coauthored the 1973 textbook Gravitation with Wheeler; Zurek coedited the 1983 Quantum Theory and Measurement with him. In spring 1952, as John Wheeler neared the end of design realized, the conditions for creating a geon almost certainly work for the first thermonuclear explosion, he plotted a rad- do not exist in our universe except possibly in its earliest ical change of research direction: from particles and atomic moments. And once a geon was created, not only would its nuclei to general relativity. waves leak out slowly but a collective instability would de- With only one quantitative observational contact (the stroy it in a short time. Nevertheless, for Wheeler the geon perihelion shift of Mercury) and two qualitative ones (the was crucial: It hinted at a richness that might reside, as yet expansion of the universe and gravitational light deflection) unexplored, in Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity; general relativity in the early 1950s had become a backwater it gave him the courage to enlist students and postdocs in his of physics. It was more a branch of mathematics than of quest for that richness; and it gave him the idea that funda- physics, and a not very interesting one. Among the world’s mental particles might actually be built, in some manner, leading physicists at the time, only Wheeler envisioned a from curved spacetime—quantum mechanical variants of future in which curved spacetime would be fundamental to a geon. the nature of matter and the astrophysical universe. Because, Charge without charge might also exist: Resurrecting a in his words, “relativity is too important to leave to the math- 1924 idea of Hermann Weyl, Wheeler imagined electric field ematicians,” Wheeler set out to discover its roles. Through lines threading topological handles in the structure of space that quest, over the subsequent two decades, he, his students, (for which he coined the word “wormhole”). One mouth of and their intellectual descendants would revitalize general the wormhole would have electric fields entering it and thus relativity and make it an exciting field for other researchers. exhibit negative charge, and the fields emerging from the “If you would learn, teach!” was one of Wheeler’s fa- other mouth would make it positively charged. Could an vorite aphorisms (figure 1). So as the first step in his quest, electron’s or proton’s charge be some quantum variant of that he taught a course in relativity at Princeton University—the scenario? first such course since 1941. In his 1952–53 course, he began By 1955, when Wheeler published his first geon paper2 to develop his own physical and geometric viewpoint on the (including remarks about charge without charge and worm- subject, a viewpoint that would later be enshrined in his text- holes), he was bubbling over with ideas for general-relativity book Gravitation.1 research projects and was starting to feed them to his first set of relativity students. He was also developing an approach “Everything is fields” to physics that he called radical conservative-ism: Insist on ad- While teaching his first relativity course, Wheeler realized hering to well-established physical laws (be conservative), there could exist, at least in principle, a spherical or toroidal but follow those laws into their most extreme domains (be object made up of electromagnetic waves that hold them- radical), where unexpected insights into nature might be selves together gravitationally, with the waves’ gravitational found. He attributed that philosophy to his own revered binding produced by their energy. He called such an object a mentor, Niels Bohr. geon (gravitational–electromagnetic entity), and he explored In that spirit, in the mid- and late 1950s Wheeler and his its properties in depth as a classical model for an elementary entourage explored geons of all conceivable types, cylindrical particle.2 (For “geon” and other terms coined by Wheeler, see gravitational waves, the interaction of neutrinos with curved box 1.) More interesting, he realized a bit later, was a purely spacetime, the interface between general relativity and quan- gravitational geon: a bundle of gravitational waves held to- tum theory, the physical interpretation of quantum mechan- gether gravitationally. Such a geon would pull on its sur- ics, and a closed universe made from a large number of roundings, thereby exhibiting mass, but it would not contain wormhole mouths with collective gravitational pulls suffi- any material mass. Mass without mass, he called it. cient to bend the universe’s space up into a topological The geon in one sense was a dead end. As Wheeler soon 3-sphere. In a tour de force, Wheeler and his group of nine 40 April 2009 Physics Today © 2009 American Institute of Physics, S-0031-9228-0904-030-7 Figure 1. John Wheeler lecturing at a conference in Cambridge, UK, in 1971. Wheeler’s style was to cover the blackboard with inspirational colored-chalk diagrams and phrases before the lecture, then work his way through them, one by one. KIP THORNE students, postdocs, and visitors presented papers on all those technique to solve Einstein’s vacuum field equations. That issues at the First International Conference on General Rela- technique, in the hands of Richard Isaacson, a student under tivity and Gravitation—held in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, one of us (Misner), morphed into the rigorous description of in January 1957—and wrote them up,3 mostly as eight papers gravitational-wave energy that forms the buttress of today’s in the July 1957 issue of Reviews of Modern Physics. gravitational-wave searches. As with Wheeler’s geon paper, some of those papers are While working on thermonuclear weapons in the now historical curiosities, but four laid crucial foundations early 1950s, Wheeler had learned the power of numerical for major developments. Joseph Weber used his paper with simulations, so he encouraged his students to begin laying Wheeler on cylindrical gravitational waves as a springboard foundations for numerical relativity. He envisioned an era, for launching his pioneering research on gravitational-wave which has now arrived, when numerical simulations would experiments—research that underpins today’s gravitational- reveal the nonlinear dynamics of curved spacetime— wave observatories. A paper, discussed below, by Tullio geometro dynamics under the most extreme circumstances. Regge and Wheeler became the foundation for future studies Seminal papers by Richard Arnowitt, Stanley Deser, and of black hole pulsations. Hugh Everett laid out in his paper Misner expressed geometrodynamics in the mathematical what has come to be called the many-worlds interpretation form that would become for decades the preferred starting of quantum mechanics, and in an accompanying paper point for computational work.6 Papers on binaries made from Wheeler explained Everett’s ideas in different language. wormholes attracting each other, written in the late 1950s and Despite his own misgivings about “many worlds,” which he early 1960s by Wheeler’s students Brill, Misner, and Richard more modestly called the relative-state formulation of quan- Lindquist, are still used today, a half century later, to provide tum mechanics, Wheeler recognized the importance of initial data7 for some simulations of binary black holes. And Everett’s ideas: He encouraged Everett and helped dissemi- an elegant, analytical solution of the constraint equation, sug- nate those ideas, and even returned to them in 2001 in one of gested by Wheeler and carried through by Brill, is used today his last published papers.4 as the starting point for simulations of highly distorted black The gravitational geon and the model universe con- holes that vibrate wildly, emitting copious gravitational structed from wormholes were entities made solely from waves, before settling down into a quiescent state. Fifty years spacetime curvature—entities whose geometries must evolve ago Wheeler could only dream of the 21st-century simulations as time passes. Wheeler realized they were examples of that are now teaching us wonderful things about nonlinear geometrodynamics—a term he coined by analogy with elec- geometro dynamics. trodynamics to denote the structure and dynamics of curved In 1953 or 1954, while pondering geons in the quantum spacetime. He chose Geometrodynamics as the title of his first domain, Wheeler identified the characteristic length scale long treatise on relativity, mostly a collection of his early rel- (~10−33 cm) and time scale (~10−43 s) on which general relativity ativity publications. In his students’ hands, those early ideas must break down and be replaced by new laws of quantum have had a huge impact:5 In 1960 Wheeler’s postdoc Dieter gravity. The lengths and times had been introduced into Brill and undergraduate James Hartle fleshed out the gravi- physics a half century earlier by Max Planck, so Wheeler gave tational geon by developing a two- length-scale expansion them the names “Planck length” and “Planck time.” (In www.physicstoday.org April 2009 Physics Today 41 the probability distribution for tiny fluctuations away from Box 1. Wheeler coinages general relativity’s classical spacetime geometry. Through John Wheeler believed that the names given to concepts or discussions with Misner, Bryce DeWitt (then at the University to descriptions of an idea strongly influence how we think of North Carolina), and others, Wheeler came to understand about concepts and ideas, even how we work on them and the arena for that wavefunction: It is defined on the space of build on them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pursuit of Quantum Gravity
    The Pursuit of Quantum Gravity Cécile DeWitt-Morette The Pursuit of Quantum Gravity Memoirs of Bryce DeWitt from 1946 to 2004 123 Cécile DeWitt-Morette Department of Physics Center for Relativity University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-14269-7 e-ISBN 978-3-642-14270-3 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-14270-3 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011921724 c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is con- cerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publica- tion or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protec- tive laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design:WMXDesignGmbH,Heidelberg Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Dedicated to our daughters, Nicolette, Jan, Christiane, Abigail Preface This book is written for the curious reader. I hope it will also be a good read for the professional physicist.
    [Show full text]
  • Boson Stars: Early History and Recent Prospects
    BOSON STARS: EARLY HISTORY AND RECENT PROSPECTSa ECKEHARD W. MIELKEb Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad Aut´onoma Metropolitana–Iztapalapa, Apartado Postal 55-534, C.P. 09340, M´exico, D.F., MEXICO FRANZ E. SCHUNCKc Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, United Kingdom Boson stars are descendants of the so–called geons of Wheeler, except that they are built from scalar particles instead of electromagnetic fields. If scalar fields exist in nature, such localized configurations kept together by their self-generated gravitational field can form within Einstein’s general relativity. In the case of complex scalar fields, an absolutely stable branch of such non-topological solitons with conserved particle number exists. Our present surge stems from the speculative possibility that these compact objects could provide a considerable fraction of the non-baryonic part of dark matter. In any case, they may serve as a convenient “laboratory” for studying numerically rapidly rotating bodies in general relativity and the generation of gravitational waves. 1 Introduction If scalar fields exist in nature, soliton-type configurations kept together by their self- generated gravitational field can form absolutely stable boson stars (BS), resembling neutron stars. They are descendants of the so–called geons of Wheeler 140. We will review the history of these hypothetical stars, starting 1968 with the work of Kaup as well as that of Ruffini and Bonazzola. In building macroscopic boson stars, a nonlinear Higgs type potential was later considered as an additional repulsive interaction. Thereby the Kaup limit for boson stars can even exceed the limiting mass of 3.23 M⊙ for neutron stars.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Knowledge, Information, and Entropy the Book John Von
    6. Knowledge, Information, and Entropy The book John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics contains a fascinating and informative article written by Eckehart Kohler entitled “Why von Neumann Rejected Carnap’s Dualism of Information Concept.” The topic is precisely the core issue before us: How is knowledge connected to physics? Kohler illuminates von Neumann’s views on this subject by contrasting them to those of Carnap. Rudolph Carnap was a distinguished philosopher, and member of the Vienna Circle. He was in some sense a dualist. He had studied one of the central problems of philosophy, namely the distinction between analytic statements and synthetic statements. (The former are true or false by virtue of a specified set of rules held in our minds, whereas the latter are true or false by virtue their concordance with physical or empirical facts.) His conclusions had led him to the idea that there are two different domains of truth, one pertaining to logic and mathematics and the other to physics and the natural sciences. This led to the claim that there are “Two Concepts of Probability,” one logical the other physical. That conclusion was in line with the fact that philosophers were then divided between two main schools as to whether probability should be understood in terms of abstract idealizations or physical sequences of outcomes of measurements. Carnap’s bifurcations implied a similar division between two different concepts of information, and of entropy. In 1952 Carnap was working at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton and about to publish a work on his dualistic theory of information, according to which epistemological concepts like information should be treated separately from physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Oral History Collection, 1969-1973, 1977
    Computer Oral History Collection, 1969-1973, 1977 INTERVIEWEES: John Todd & Olga Taussky Todd INTERVIEWER: Henry S. Tropp DATE OF INTERVIEW: July 12, 1973 Tropp: This is a discussion with Doctor and Mrs. Todd in their apartment at the University of Michigan on July 2nd, l973. This question that I asked you earlier, Mrs. Todd, about your early meetings with Von Neumann, I think are just worth recording for when you first met him and when you first saw him. Olga Tauskky Todd: Well, I first met him and saw him at that time. I actually met him at that location, he was lecturing in the apartment of Menger to a private little set. Tropp: This was Karl Menger's apartment in Vienna? Olga Tauskky Todd: In Vienna, and he was on his honeymoon. And he lectured--I've forgotten what it was about, I am ashamed to say. It would come back, you know. It would come back, but I cannot recall it at this moment. It had nothing to do with game theory. I don't know, something in.... John Todd: She has a very good memory. It will come back. Tropp: Right. Approximately when was this? Before l930? Olga Tauskky Todd: For additional information, contact the Archives Center at 202.633.3270 or [email protected] Computer Oral History Collection, 1969-1973, 1977 No. I think it may have been in 1932 or something like that. Tropp: In '32. Then you said you saw him again at Goettingen, after the-- Olga Tauskky Todd: I saw him at Goettingen.
    [Show full text]
  • Everettian Probabilities, the Deutsch-Wallace Theorem and the Principal Principle
    Everettian probabilities, the Deutsch-Wallace theorem and the Principal Principle Harvey R. Brown and Gal Ben Porath Chance, when strictly examined, is a mere negative word, and means not any real power which has anywhere a being in nature. David Hume (Hume, 2008) [The Deutsch-Wallace theorem] permits what philosophy would hitherto have regarded as a formal impossibility, akin to deriving an ought from an is, namely deriving a probability statement from a factual statement. This could be called deriving a tends to from a does. David Deutsch (Deutsch, 1999) [The Deutsch-Wallace theorem] is a landmark in decision theory. Nothing comparable has been achieved in any chance theory. [It] is little short of a philosophical sensation . it shows why credences should conform to [quantum chances]. Simon Saunders (Saunders, 'The Everett interpretation: probability' [unpublished manuscript]) Abstract This paper is concerned with the nature of probability in physics, and in quantum mechanics in particular. It starts with a brief discussion of the evolution of Itamar Pitowsky's thinking about probability in quantum theory from 1994 to 2008, and the role of Gleason's 1957 theorem in his derivation of the Born Rule. Pitowsky's defence of probability therein as a logic of partial belief leads us into a broader discussion of probability in physics, in which the existence of objective \chances" is questioned, and the status of David Lewis influential Principal Principle is critically examined. This is followed by a sketch of the work by David Deutsch and David Wallace which resulted in the Deutsch-Wallace (DW) theorem in Everettian quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering the Quantum Foam
    Engineering the Quantum Foam Reginald T. Cahill School of Chemistry, Physics and Earth Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia [email protected] _____________________________________________________ ABSTRACT In 1990 Alcubierre, within the General Relativity model for space-time, proposed a scenario for ‘warp drive’ faster than light travel, in which objects would achieve such speeds by actually being stationary within a bubble of space which itself was moving through space, the idea being that the speed of the bubble was not itself limited by the speed of light. However that scenario required exotic matter to stabilise the boundary of the bubble. Here that proposal is re-examined within the context of the new modelling of space in which space is a quantum system, viz a quantum foam, with on-going classicalisation. This model has lead to the resolution of a number of longstanding problems, including a dynamical explanation for the so-called `dark matter’ effect. It has also given the first evidence of quantum gravity effects, as experimental data has shown that a new dimensionless constant characterising the self-interaction of space is the fine structure constant. The studies here begin the task of examining to what extent the new spatial self-interaction dynamics can play a role in stabilising the boundary without exotic matter, and whether the boundary stabilisation dynamics can be engineered; this would amount to quantum gravity engineering. 1 Introduction The modelling of space within physics has been an enormously challenging task dating back in the modern era to Galileo, mainly because it has proven very difficult, both conceptually and experimentally, to get a ‘handle’ on the phenomenon of space.
    [Show full text]
  • Council for Innovative Research Peer Review Research Publishing System
    ISSN 2347-3487 Einstein's gravitation is Einstein-Grossmann's equations Alfonso Leon Guillen Gomez Independent scientific researcher, Bogota, Colombia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract While the philosophers of science discuss the General Relativity, the mathematical physicists do not question it. Therefore, there is a conflict. From the theoretical point view “the question of precisely what Einstein discovered remains unanswered, for we have no consensus over the exact nature of the theory's foundations. Is this the theory that extends the relativity of motion from inertial motion to accelerated motion, as Einstein contended? Or is it just a theory that treats gravitation geometrically in the spacetime setting?”. “The voices of dissent proclaim that Einstein was mistaken over the fundamental ideas of his own theory and that their basic principles are simply incompatible with this theory. Many newer texts make no mention of the principles Einstein listed as fundamental to his theory; they appear as neither axiom nor theorem. At best, they are recalled as ideas of purely historical importance in the theory's formation. The very name General Relativity is now routinely condemned as a misnomer and its use often zealously avoided in favour of, say, Einstein's theory of gravitation What has complicated an easy resolution of the debate are the alterations of Einstein's own position on the foundations of his theory”, (Norton, 1993) [1]. Of other hand from the mathematical point view the “General Relativity had been formulated as a messy set of partial differential equations in a single coordinate system. People were so pleased when they found a solution that they didn't care that it probably had no physical significance” (Hawking and Penrose, 1996) [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Weber's Contribution to Gravitational Waves and Neutrinos
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia Historical Article New Astronomical Observations: Joseph Weber’s Contribution to Gravitational Waves Citation: S. Gottardo (2017) New Astronomical Observations: Joseph and Neutrinos Detection Weber’s Contribution to Gravitational Waves and Neutrinos Detection. Sub- stantia 1(1): 61-67. doi: 10.13128/Sub- stantia-13 Stefano Gottardo Copyright: © 2017 S. Gottardo.This European Laboratory for Nonlinear Spectroscopy (LENS), 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Flor- is an open access, peer-reviewed arti- ence), Italy cle published by Firenze University E-mail: [email protected] Press (http://www.fupress.com/substan- tia) and distribuited under distributed under the terms of the Creative Com- Abstract. Joseph Weber, form Maryland University, was a pioneer in the experimen- mons Attribution License, which per- tal research of gravitational waves and neutrinos. Today these two techniques are very mits unrestricted use, distribution, and promising for astronomical observation, since will allow to observe astrophysical phe- reproduction in any medium, provided nomena under a new light. We review here almost 30 years of Weber’s career spent the original author and source are on gravity waves and neutrinos; Weber’s experimental results were strongly criticized credited. by the international community, but his research, despite critics, boosted the brand Data Availability Statement: All rel- new (in mid-sixties of last century) research field of gravity waves to become one of evant data are within the paper and its the most important in XXI century. On neutrino side, he found an unorthodox way Supporting Information files. to reduce the size of detectors typically huge and he claimed to observe neutrinos flux with a small pure crystal of sapphire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE BEGINNING OF INFINITY: EXPLANATIONS THAT TRANSFORM THE WORLD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Deutsch | 487 pages | 29 May 2012 | Penguin Putnam Inc | 9780143121350 | English | New York, NY, United States The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World PDF Book Every argument includes premises in support of a conclusion, but the premises themselves are left unargued. Nov 12, Gary rated it it was amazing Shelves: science. In other words we must have some form of evidence, and it must be coherent with our other beliefs. Nov 12, Gary rated it it was amazing Shelves: science. I can't say why exactly. It seems more to the point to think of it as something emotive — as the expression of a mood. This will lead to the development of explanatory theories variation , which can then be criticized and tested selection. Accuracy and precision are important standards in our evaluation of explanations; standards that are absent in bad explanations. Every argument includes premises in support of a conclusion, but the premises themselves are left unargued. Deutsch starts with explanations being the basis for knowledge, and builds up basic, hard-to-argue-with principles into convincing monoliths that smash some conventional interpretations of knowledge, science and philosophy to tiny pieces. His reliance on Popper is problematic. I will be re-reading them again until it really sinks in. Evolution, in contrast, represents a good explanation because it not only fits the evidence but the details are hard to vary. Barefoot Season Susan Mallery. But the "Occam's Razor" described by the author is not the one practiced in reality.
    [Show full text]
  • John A. Wheeler's Lessons to an Undergraduate Student
    Phys. Status Solidi C 6, No. 11, 2253–2259 (2009) / DOI 10.1002/pssc.200982051 c solidi pssstatus www.pss-c.com physica current topics in solid state physics John A. Wheeler’s lessons to an undergraduate student Allen P. Mills, Jr.* University of California, Riverside, 92521, USA Received 15 January 2009, accepted 6 February 2009 Published online 16 October 2009 PACS 01.60.+q, 01.65.+g * e-mail [email protected] The author had the good fortune to write his May 1961 Junior ing the paper were preserved and are exhibited here. While research paper “Determination of the Curvature Tensor” un- not valuable scientifically, this material is presented to illus- der the guidance of Professor John Archibald Wheeler (July trate the teaching lavished on an undergraduate and some- 9, 1911 – April 13, 2008). By a series of miraculous mishaps thing about the character and philosophy of the teacher. several of Wheeler’s note sheets as well as his letter critiqu- © 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1 Private lessons I attended Princeton University Hall, upon whose roof Prof. Robert H. Dicke would later and graduated in the Class of 1962. I had the good fortune mount his microwave apparatus for detecting the Big Bang to write my May 1961 Junior research paper “Determina- [4] and his telescope for measuring the oblateness of the tion of the Curvature Tensor” under the guidance of Pro- sun as a test of the Brans-Dicke scalar-tensor gravity the- fessor John Archibald Wheeler (July 9, 1911 – April 13, ory [5].
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation
    A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Gustavo Rodrigues Rocha1,4, Dean Rickles2,4, and Florian J. Boge3,4 1 Department of Physics, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Feira de Santana, Brazil 2History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 3Interdisciplinary Centre for Science and Technology Studies (IZWT), Wuppertal University, Wuppertal, Germany 4Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS), Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa Contents 1Introduction...................................... 2 2 The Formalism of the Consistent Histories Approach . ............ 3 2.1HistorySpaces................................... 3 2.2 Consistency, Compatibility, and Grain . ......... 5 2.3Decoherence ..................................... 6 3 Interpreting and Understanding the Formalism in Historical Context . 8 3.1 Single-Framework Rule and Realm-Dependent Reality: From Method to Reality andBack....................................... 8 arXiv:2103.05280v1 [physics.hist-ph] 9 Mar 2021 3.2 Information, Formalization, and the Emergence of Structural Objectivity . 10 3.3 Cybernetics and Measurement: From von Neumann and the Cybernetics Group to theSantaFeInstitute................................ 11 1 4 Robert Griffiths and Roland Omn`es: Context and Logic . 17 5 Decoherent Histories: Consistent Histories A` La Gell-Mann and Hartle . 19 6Conclusion ........................................ 25 1 Introduction Developed,
    [Show full text]