Central Planning and Neomericantilism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Planning and Neomericantilism Central Planning and Neomercantilism The William Volker Fund Series in the Humane Studies EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS by Ludwig von Mises THE ECONOMIC POINT OF VIEW by Israel M. Kirzner ESSAYS IN EUROPEAN ECONOMIC THOUGHT Edited by Louise Sommer SCIENTISM AND VALUES Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins A SOCIALIST EMPIRE: THE INCAS OF PERU by Louis Baudin RELATIVISM AND THE STUDY OF MAN Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins FREEDOM AND THE LAW by Bruno Leoni MAN, ECONOMY, AND STATE-2 vols. by Murray N. Rothbard THE ULTIMATE FOUNDATION OF ECONOMIC SCIENCE by Ludwig von Mises PSYCHIATRY AND RESPONSIBILITY Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins THE FREE AND PROSPEROUS COMMONWEALTH by Ludwig von Mises SCIENCE AND HISTORY: A CRITIQUE OF POSITIVIST EPISTEMOLOGY by Heinrich Rickert THE NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY Edited by Felix Morley ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMICS: A BRIEF SURVEY OF PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES by Faustino Ballve THE NEW ARGUMENT ·IN ECONOMICS Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins ORGANIZATION OF DEBT INTO CURRENCY AND OTHER PAPERS by Charles Holt Carroll ECONOMIC HARMONIES by Frederic Bastiat ECONOMIC SOPHISMS by Frederic Bastiat SELECTED ESSAYS ON POLITICAL ECONOMY by Frederic Bastiat CENTRAL PLANNING AND NEOMERCANTILISM Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins Central Planning and Neomercantilism Edited by HELMUT SCHOECK and JAMES W. WIGGINS Papers by GARRETT HARDIN HELMUT SCHOECK THOMAS F. JOHNSON ARTHUR A. SHENFIELD GERHARD O. W. MUELLER WILLIAM S. STOKES WILLIAM H. PETERSON D. ELTON TRUEBLOOD MURRAY N. ROTHBARD ERNEST VAN DEN HAAG JAMES W. WIGGINS D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY, INC. PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY TORONTO LONDON NEW YORK D. VAN NOSTR.AND COMPANY, INC. 120 Alexander St., Princeton, New Jersey (Principal office) 24 West 40 Street, New York 18, New York D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY (Canada) LTD. 358, Kensington High Street, London, W.14, England D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY, LTD. 25 Hollinger ltoad, Toronto 16, Canada Copyright, © 1964 by WILLIAM VOLKER FUND· Published simultaneously in Canada by D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY (Canada), LTD. No reproduction in any form of this book~ in whole or in part (except for brief quotation in critical articles or reviews), may be made without written authorization from the publishers. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contributors GARRETT HARDIN, Professor of Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, is the author of Biology: Its Principles and Implications (1961). In addition to numerous articles in professional journals, he has also written an exposition of evolution for the lay reader, Nature and Man's Fate (1959). THOMAS F. JOHNSON is Director of Research, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Previously, he served as assistant commissioner of the Federal Housing Admin­ istration in charge of research and legislation. Dr. Johnson has served on the faculties of the University of Virginia and George Washington University. He has written Small Business) Its Prospects and Its Problems; and The Price of Price Controls. He is one of the authors of Renewing America's Cities. GERHARD O. W. MUELLER, Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, is the director of the Comparative Crim­ inal Law Project. His published works include History of American C'riminal Law Scholarship (1963); Legal Regulation of Sexual Conduct (1961); and Essays in Crim.­ inal Science. (1961). He holds editorial posts with the Journal of Offender Therap'y; Journal of Criminal Law) C'riminology and Police Science; and Quaderni di Crim­ inologia Clinica. WILLIAM H. PETERSON) Professor of Economics, New York Uni­ versity,Graduate School of Business Administration. He 4as been a weekly contributor and business book editor v vi Contribulors of The Wall Street Journal from 1956 to the present. Among his works are The Great Farm Prob,lem (1959) and The Question oj Government.al Oil Import Restrictions (1959). MURRAY N. ROTHBARD, Ph.D., consulting economist, New York City. His published works include Man} Economy} arnd State) two volumes (1962); The Panic of 1819: Reactions and Policies (1962); "The Case for a I00 Per Cent Gold Dollar," in Leland B. Yeager, ed., In Search of a. Monetary Constitution (1962); and America's Great Depression (1963). HELMUT SCHOECK, Associate Professor of Sociology at Emory University. Dr. Schoeck came to America following World War II. During 1953-1954 he was a Visiting Research Fellow in Sociology at Yale. In addition to numerous essays and research papers in professional journals, Dr. Schoeck has written, translated, or contributed to some sixteen books, including Financing Medical Care (1962); Was heisst politisch unmoeglich? (1959); U.S.A.: Motive und Strukturen (1958); and Nietzsches Philosophie des Mensch­ lich-A Uzum.enschlichen (1948). ARTHUR A. SHENFIELD, Economic Director of the Federation of British Industries since 1955. He has served as assistant editor of the London and Cambridge Economic Service, lecturer in economics at the University of Birmingham, economic adviser to the government of Trinidad, chairman of commissions of enquiry, and chairman of the Finance Committee of the Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, and was in active practice at the English bar. He has lectured on British economic affairs in various countries and is the author of numerous essays and articles on economic questions, and, in particular, reports on eco- C'ont'ributors vii nomic problems in the British Caribbean. Mr. Shenfield was Ford Foundation Visiting Professor in the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business for 1963. WILLIAM S. STOKES, Senior Professor of Comparative Political Institutions at Claremont Men's College and the Claremont Graduate School. He was chairman of the Latin American Affairs Committee of the American Political Science As­ sociation and has conducted research in all the Latin Amer­ ican countries, leading to over two hundred publications in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Before accepting an en­ dowed chair at Claremont Men's College, he was Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin. Dr. Stokes has lectured at many Latin American institutions of higher learning. He was a civilian member of the faculty of the National War College (1962-63) and served on the Executive Council of the Inter-American Defense 'College. His books are: Honduras: An Areia Study in Government (1950) and Latin A merican Politics (1959). DAVID ELTON TRUEBLOOD, Professor of Philosophy at Earlham College. He has written and published twenty-one books. Selected titles include Philosophy of Religion; The Pre­ dicament of Modern Man; The Recovery of Family Life; and The Life We Prize. In 1954-55, Dr. Trueblood served as Chief, Religious Information, United States In­ formation Agency. ERNEST VAN DEN HAAG is Adj. Professor of Social Philosophy at New York University and a lecturer at the New School for Social Research. Among his special interests are the economic aspects of social behavior and education. He is a Fellow of the Royal Economic Society and the American Sociological Association. In addition to many articles, his books include Education as an Industry} The Fabric of Society (with Ralph Ross), and Passion and Social' Con­ straint (1963). viii C'ontributors JAMES W. WIGGINS, Professor of Sociology and Associate Dean of Converse College; formerly chairman of the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Emory University, where he developed the doctoral program in sociology. Dr. Wig­ gins served as co-editor of Foreign Aid Re-examined and has had articles published in many journals and symposia. He has served as consultant to various national and regional organizations. Preface During a conference in 1961, examining the then. so fashion­ able confrontation of the public and the private sectors of the economy, several participants recognized in the advocacy of an enlarged public sector a neomercantilist ideology and a renewed wish for centralized planning. (By 1964, proposals for "massive Federal planning," even-literally-for a "neomercantilism," have come forth in numerous articles, books, pamphlets, position papers, and national conferences.) It seemed, therefore, of interest to continue these critical explorations of the philosophy, limits, and record of central planning. Five of the participants in the 1961 symposium joined six ad­ ditional members for a week-long conference in September of 1962. 'The papers discussed at that meeting resulted, after re­ visions, in the present volume. Even though the final versions of most of the essays reflect positive responses to the suggestions and criticisms each author received from the others, it should be pointed out that, as always in such enterprises, several differences of interpretation and em­ phasis have remained. Each author is alone responsible' for his views and facts. It would be unfair to look for a group consensus on the majority of the questions analyzed in this book. Nevertheless, the invitations to this symposium had been ex­ tended to men whose published work had shown an open mind for the potential, the advantages, and the inherent worth of the un­ planned society and economy. The "debating team approach" rarely yields. a readable book. Of course, today as ever we can point to gaps and disturbances in our social, cultural, and economic environment which we all might wish were not there. There will never be a society so per­ fect, and with all its members on the same high level of well-being at the same time, that nothing could be imagined to be improv- ix X Prefa,ce able. The question is only whether some sort of central planning, and centralized allocation of resources to pay for the programs, will do the trick. The contributors to this volume are probably as distressed by the sight of slums, unemployment, and wasted resources as the planners. But they see little in the facts to feed a hope that these blemishes in a society will go away after vigorous centralized planning. 'They think they can offer solid reasons and numerous series of facts to support the conclusion that such planning, no matter how well intentioned, usually will make the problems only more intractable.
Recommended publications
  • Research Article Explaining Protectionism Support: the Role of Economic Factors
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Economics Volume 2013, Article ID 954071, 14 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/954071 Research Article Explaining Protectionism Support: The Role of Economic Factors Natalia Melgar,1 Juliette Milgram-Baleix,2 and Máximo Rossi1 1 Department of Economics, University of the Republic, Constituyente 1502, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay 2 Department of Economic eory and History, University of Granada, Campus Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Natalia Melgar; [email protected] Received 8 November 2012; Accepted 26 November 2012 Academic Editors: T. M. Dall and D. Mitra Copyright © 2013 Natalia Melgar et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We �nd that individuals’ opinions concerning protectionist policies match with how their revenue could be affected in the medium or long term by trade liberalisation in line with predictions of the comparative advantage models. An adverse macroeconomic context (large increase in the unemployment rate or in�ation rate) increases protectionist attitudes, thus re�ecting that people do not trust that free trade will lead to lower prices or create jobs despite trade theory optimism. People share a mercantilist view of trade since more imports increase protectionism support, while people positively value exports, especially in small countries. Regarding policy measures, while protectionist measures do not in�uence protectionism support in general, easy access to exports reduces people’s support for protectionism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Food Insecurity in East Asia
    Rice, politics and power: the political economy of food insecurity in East Asia Paul Belesky Master of International Studies (International Relations) The University of Queensland A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Queensland, 2016 School of Political Science and International Studies School of Social Science Abstract This thesis has three main objectives: (1) to provide a critical political economy study of the complex interplay between rice, politics and power in East Asia; (2) to make a contribution to understanding the evolution of the regional and global food system through an historically-contextualised exploration of the political economy of rice in the East Asian region; and (3) to make a contribution towards an alternative analytical framework for the political economy of food insecurity in the region. This study focuses on the agricultural commodity of rice as a prism through which to examine and explore the complex and multidimensional nature of food insecurity in the region, with rice providing a lens through which to explore social relations and relations of power that underpin the political economy of food and agriculture. This study has identified a gap in literature in relation to a contemporary analysis of the political economy of rice, with a second gap appearing in relation to the evolution of the global food system from an East Asian perspective. This thesis aims to make a contribution towards addressing these gaps in literature. With these objectives in mind, this thesis responds
    [Show full text]
  • On the Crisis of the “Liberalization Policy” in the Economics of Interdependence
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lorenz, Detlef Article — Digitized Version On the crisis of the “liberalization policy” in the economics of interdependence Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Lorenz, Detlef (1978) : On the crisis of the “liberalization policy” in the economics of interdependence, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 13, Iss. 7/8, pp. 169-173, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02929188 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/139551 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu WORLD TRADE On the Crisis of the "Liberalization Policy" in the Economics of Interdependence by Detlef Lorenz, Berlin* In spite of all protestations and exhortations it is a fact that trade liberalization, the modern version of free trade, is caught in a crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Information Technology in the Learning Economy: Challenges for Developing Countries Dieter Ernst and Bengt-Åke Lundvall
    9. Information technology in the learning economy: challenges for developing countries Dieter Ernst and Bengt-Åke Lundvall The engine of growth should be technological change, with international trade serving as a lubricating oil and not as fuel. (Lewis 1978, p. 74) Both the pace and the acceleration of innovation are startling; nay terrify- ing...No one can predict the ...range of skills which will need to be amassed to create and take advantage of the next revolution but one. (And thinking about the next but one is what everyone is doing. The game is already over for the next.) (Anderson 1997) Research in industrialized countries has shown that the ability to learn determines the economic success not only of firms and industries but also of whole regions (industrial districts) and countries (OECD 1996a, 1996b, 1996c). This has given rise to the concept of the learning economy, which is based on the following propositions (Lundvall and Johnson 1994; Lundvall 1994, 1996): learning is an interactive, socially embedded process; its efficiency depends on the institutional setup, the national innovation system. The content of the knowledge generated through learning is criti- cal: tacit knowledge is essential for adjusting to change (flexibility) and for implementing change (innovation). This chapter inquires how the concept of the learning economy can be applied to the requirements of developing countries (DCs). Its main purpose is to develop an analytical framework for understanding how learning and capability formation can foster industrial upgrading, with special emphasis on the spread of information technology (IT). Under what conditions can DCs use this set of generic technologies to improve their learning capabilities? As a growing amount of knowledge becomes accessible through worldwide information networks, the establishment of national IT capabilities should help to accelerate knowledge creation and diffusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Response to the Great Depression of the 1930S: Turkish Neomercantilism in the Balkan Context
    Turkish Studies ISSN: 1468-3849 (Print) 1743-9663 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ftur20 Policy response to the Great Depression of the 1930s: Turkish neomercantilism in the Balkan context Adnan Türegün To cite this article: Adnan Türegün (2016) Policy response to the Great Depression of the 1930s: Turkish neomercantilism in the Balkan context, Turkish Studies, 17:4, 666-690, DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2016.1227684 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2016.1227684 Published online: 01 Sep 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 234 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ftur20 Download by: [Cankaya Universitesi] Date: 22 September 2017, At: 06:32 TURKISH STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 17, NO. 4, 666–690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2016.1227684 Policy response to the Great Depression of the 1930s: Turkish neomercantilism in the Balkan context Adnan Türegün Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada ABSTRACT In examining the Turkish response to the crisis of the 1930s, this paper contributes to existing literature at three levels: economic policy conception, comparative case selection, and mode of explanation. First, it takes a holistic approach to economic policy (neomercantilism) by looking at its foreign trade and finance (autarkic), microeconomic (etatist), and macroeconomic (neoclassical orthodox) dimensions. Second, it locates the Turkish response in the Balkan context, where other small states responded to comparable stimuli. Third, while viewing the macroeconomic conservatism of Turkish neomercantilism as a situational necessity, it explains the autarkic dimension by the shared German metropolitan linkages of the Balkans as a region, and the etatist dimension by the Kemalist bureaucracy’s larger room for maneuver in a context of wider gap between political modernization and economic backwardness.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Argument in Economics the William Volker Fund Series in the Humane Studies
    The New Argument in Economics The William Volker Fund Series In the Humane Studies EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS by Ludwig von Mises THE ECONOMIC POINT OF VIEW by Israel M. Kirzner ESSAYS IN EUROPEAN ECONOMIC THOUGHT Edited by Louise Sommer SCIENTISM AND VALUES Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins A SOCIALIST EMPIRE: THE INCAS OF PERU by Louis Baudin RELATIVISM AND THE STUDY OF MAN Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins FREEDOM AND THE LAW by Bruno Leoni MAN, ECONOMY, AND STATE-2 vols. by Murray N. Rothbard THE ULTIMATE FOUNDATION OF ECONOMIC SCIENGE by Ludwig von Mises PSYCHIATRY AND RESPONSIBILITY Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins THE FREE AND PROSPEROUS COMMONWEALTH by Ludwig von Mises SCIENCE AND HISTORY: A CRITIQUE OF POSITIVIST EPISTEMOLOGY by Heinrich Rickert THE NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR .A FREE SOCIETY Edited by Felix Morley ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMICS: A BRIEF SURVEY OF PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES by Faustino Ballve THE NEW ARGUMENT IN ECONOMICS Edited by Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins The New Argument in Economics THE PUBLIC versus THE PRIVATE SECTOR Edited by HELMUT SCHOECK AND JAMES W. WIGGINS Papers by KARL BRANDT ARTHUR A. SHENFIELD LOWELL B. MASON GEORGE J. STIGLER JEROME WILSON MILLIMAN WILLIAM S. STOKES SYLVESTER PETRO ERNEST VAN DEN HAAG J. FRED RIPPY ELISEO VIVAS WILSON E. SCHMIDT W. ALLEN WALLIS D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY, INC. PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY TORONTO LONDON NEW YORK D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY, INC. 120 Alexander St., Princeton, New Jersey (Principal office) 24 West 40 Street, New York 18, New York D.
    [Show full text]
  • Neomercantilism and Great-Power Energy Competition in Central Asia and the Caspian
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Faculty Scholarship Summer 2014 Neomercantilism and great-power energy competition in Central Asia and the Caspian. Charles E. Ziegler University of Louisville, [email protected] Rajan Menon Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Original Publication Information This article was originally published in Strategic Studies Quarterly, volume 38, issue 4, in Summer 2014. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Neomercantilism and Great-Power Energy Competition in Central Asia and the Caspian Charles E. Ziegler Rajan Menon Russia, China, and the United States are vying for political influence and control of natural resources in Central Asia in what has been labeled a twenty-first-century Great Game.1 Among the conditions drawing these major powers to the region are its location at the heart of the Eur- asian landmass and its bountiful natural resources. China and Russia are driven in roughly equal measure by political and economic consider- ations. They have adopted neomercantilist policies (i.e., state-directed efforts aimed at making asymmetric economic gains at the expense of competitors, a concept we discuss at length below) to realize their goals in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Neomercantilism in the Oil Price
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2631-3561.htm REPS 5,1 Saudi neomercantilism in the oil price war Ahmed Samir Mahdi Department of Political Science, Faculty of Business Administration, 2 Economics and Political Science, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt Received 10 October 2019 Accepted 10 October 2019 Abstract Purpose – The so-called “oil price war” of 2014-2016 took place between several main global oil producers; OPEC (led by Saudi Arabia), Russia and the newcomer; American tight oil or fracking oil. These oil producers were competing against each other over market shares in the global oil market, by maintaining their high oil production rates, even if this led to a decline in oil prices and a reduction in revenues from oil sales. As energy politics need more coverage in International Political Economy (IPE) theory, this paper aims to argue that Saudi Arabia’s policies during the oil price war of 2014-2016 reflected a policy of neomercantilism, which is the IPE equivalent of the school of realism in International Relations (IR). Design/methodology/approach – This paper tests for neomercantilism by testing three of its main definitional components. The first definitional component is that the state, as the political authority, intervenes in the economic decisions. The second component is the primacy of the state interests over business corporate profits, or the primacy of political and security considerations over short-term economic and corporate profit considerations. The third is the zero-sum or relative gains nature of dealings between states.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy and Public Policy
    POLITICAL ECONOMY AND PUBLIC POLICY Deepak Lal TIIE INTERNAI'IONAI. CETrER FOR ECONOMic GiRo\vIi is a non-profit research institute founded in 1985 to stimulate international discussions on eco­ nomic policy, economic growth. and human welfare. The Center sponsors research, pxiblic'ations. and conferences in cooperation with an international network of correspondent institututes. which distribute publications ofboth the Center and other network members to I)olif'y audiences around the world. The Center's research and publications program is organized aroulnd five series: Sector Studies: Country Studies: Studies in I llman evelopment and Social Wellare: Occasional Papers; and a Reprint Series. The Center is affiliated with tihe Institute for Conteniporarv Studies, and has headquarters in Panama and a home office in San Francisco, California. Publication signifies that the Center believes a work to be a competent treatment worthy of public consideration. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions of a vork are entirely those of the author and should not be attributed to ICEG. its affiliated organizations, its board of overseers, or organizations thai support ICEG. For further inlonnation, please conta('t the International Center for Economic Growth, 243 Kearny Street, San Francisco, Califbrnia. 94108, USA. Phone (415) 981-5353: Fax (415) 986-4878. ICEG Board of Overseers Y. Seyvid Abdulai Woo-Choong Kim OPEC Fund Ibr International Daeiwoo Corp., Korea I'velopment, Austria Adalbert Krieger Vasena Abdalatif AI-I laniad Argentina Arab FAnd.fbr Economic and Pedro Pablo Kuczynski Social Developmenit. KutVait USA Nicolils Ardito-Barletta Agustin Legorreta Chairman.Panama InverlatS.A., Mexico Roy Ash Sol Linowitz Ash Capital Partnership.USA CoudertBros., USA Raymond Barre Jorge Mejia Salazar France Colombia Roberto Campos Saburo Okita NationalSenator,Brazil Institute for Domestic and Inter- Carlos Manuel Castillo nationalPoliciesStudies.Japan CosiaRica Tonfis Pastoriza A.
    [Show full text]
  • Passions in Economy, Politics, and the Media: in Discussion with Christian
    PPPaaassssssiiiooonnnsss iiinnn EEEcccooonnnooommmyyy,,, PPPooollliiitttiiicccsss,,, aaannnddd ttthhheee MMMeeedddiiiaaa::: Passions in Economy, Politics and the Media: In Discussion with Christian Theology IIInnn DDDiiissscccuuussssssiiiooonnn wwwiiittthhh CCChhhrrriiissstttiiiaaannn TTThhheeeooolllooogggyyy Conference presented by: Faculty of Theology / University of Innsbruck in cooperation with: Colloquium on Violence & Religion (COV&R) Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics Canadian Studies Centre Special thanks to the sponsors of Conference 2003: Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur (bmbwk) Kuehne & Nagel Ges.m.b.H. Land Tirol Österreichisches Ost- und Südosteuropa-Institut (osi) Österreichische Forschungsgemeinschaft Österreichische Industriellenvereinigung Raiffeisen Landesbank Tirol (RLB) Römerquelle Stadt Innsbruck Universität Innsbruck Verein zur Beförderung gemeinnütziger Tätigkeit Vorarlberger Landesregierung Special thanks to: Christian Dorner Irene Ebenbichler Mike Freudenthaler Cristina Evelina Gal Elisabeth Hochenegger Stefan Obholzer Maximilian Paulin Dietmar Steinmair Julia Stiebellehner CCCooonnnfffeeerrreeennnccceee PPPrrrooogggrrraaammm Conference Program CCCooonnnfffeeerrreeennnccceee PPPrrrooogggrrraaammm WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18 FRIDAY, JUNE 20 Main Focus: ECONOMY 09:00 Advisory Board Meeting (SR III) 08:15 Prayer Service in Memory of Bill Mishler (Capuchin’s Church) 14:00 Conference Registration (Conference Bureau) 09:00 Passions in Economy 17:00 Opening Ceremony * Chair: MATTHIAS SUTTER, Institute
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Relative Income Position on Social Capital
    1 DOES ENVY DESTROY SOCIAL FUNDAMENTALS? THE IMPACT OF RELATIVE INCOME POSITION ON SOCIAL CAPITAL ∗ Justina A.V. Fischer and Benno Torgler Abstract: Research evidence on the impact of relative income position on individual attitudes and behaviour is sorely lacking. Therefore, this paper assesses such positional impact on social capital by applying 14 different measurements to International Social Survey Programme data from 25 countries. We find support for a positional concern effect or ‘envy’ whose magnitude in several cases is quite substantial. The results indicate that such an effect is non-linear. In addition, we find an indication that absolute income level is also relevant. Lastly, changing the reference group (regional versus national) produces no significant differences in the results. JEL Classification: Z130, H260, I310, D000, D600 Keywords: Relative income position; envy; positional concerns; social capital; social norms; happiness ∗ Justina A. V. Fischer, STICERD, London School of Economics, Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE, UK and Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research (SIAW), University of St. Gallen, Bodanstrasse 8, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland, e-mails: [email protected], [email protected]; Benno Torgler, Yale Center for International and Area Studies, Leitner Program in International & Comparative Political Economy, 34 Hillhouse Avenue, P.O. Box 208206, New Haven, CT 06520 (USA), e-mail: [email protected]. He is also associated with CREMA – Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Switzerland. Both authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF). We wish to thank Julia Angelica for professional editing. 2 Envy ..
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction: the Fall of the Soviet Union and the Resurgence of Russia
    1. Introduction: The Fall of the Soviet Union and the Resurgence of Russia Kristi Elaine Govella1 University of California, Berkeley Vinod K. Aggarwal University of California, Berkeley 1.1 Introduction Much has happened in the two decades since the end of the Cold War. In the immediate aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia went through a period of dramatic domestic political change and uncertainty in the foreign policy arena. A country that was once a superpower in a bipolar world began to doubt its place in the international system—and not without reason: the collapse of the USSR left Russia in a state of economic, political, and social turmoil, marked by declining economic output and increasing inflation, foreign debt, and budget deficits. Other problems included lack of law and order, loss of central control over the periphery, conflicts in Chechnya, rampant corruption, chronic political instability, and a severe financial crisis. At the start of Vladimir Putin’s presidency, the country’s share of world GDP had fallen to just 1.5 percent, in 1 The authors would like to thank Sarah Garding, Maria Vassilieva, and Theocharis Grigoriadis for their helpful comments and feedback. Kathy Bowen, Peter Volberding, and Robert Nelson provided valuable research assistance. contrast to the 21 percent share held by the United States.2 Moreover, Russia’s economic and political transition during the 1990s was fraught with complications and disappointments. The last decade, however, has witnessed Russia’s reemergence onto the international scene, as well as a recentralization of power under former president Vladimir Putin, the current prime minister of Russia.
    [Show full text]